• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 10:51
CET 16:51
KST 00:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced14[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Information Request Regarding Chinese Ladder SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest RSL Revival: Season 3 Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation
Brood War
General
Which season is the best in ASL? FlaSh's Valkyrie Copium [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1550 users

GOMTV Announcement regarding NaNiWa - Page 60

Forum Index > SC2 General
2400 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 58 59 60 61 62 121 Next
Learion
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden28 Posts
December 15 2011 01:44 GMT
#1181
On December 15 2011 10:42 Trsjnica wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:41 tnud wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:39 Learion wrote:
I dont understand why was Idra informed 1 week ago about his Code S spot and not Naniwa if he was on top of the list before this happened.

That's also a really good point. Scoots said on Lo3 that they knew that Idra would get his spot a week ago, yet Naniwa and his management didn't get informed of this let alone informed about him not actually having the spot yet? :/

Possibly the list was 1. Naniwa, 2. Idra, 3. Sen, and Sen gained from this rather than Idra.

Also possible GSL has closer ties to Slayers/EG, and are able to get them information faster, or Slayers/EG needed to know for some future tournament participation, or something.


But if Naniwa and Idra was 1 and 2 why was only one of them informed.
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5775 Posts
December 15 2011 01:44 GMT
#1182
On December 15 2011 10:36 iamthedave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:34 coverpunch wrote:
Good statement, good decision. Reasonable minds can disagree, of course, but GOM made their position and reasoning quite clear.

Although I wonder for Naniwa, how does he re-qualify for Code S? It's unfortunate that his best option is probably to go back to the US or EU and win tournaments again...


The new Code A really isn't that bad. He should just play through a season and get to Code S.

And if he can't get through Code A... should he really BE in Code S?

I don't know, it seems backwards to me that all of a sudden the best way to get into the GSL is... not to play in the GSL?

It's not about whether he "should" be in Code S, but an as of now unresolved question of whether he has actually earned a spot in Code S already. MMA, Dongraegu, and MC earned such spots from MLG because that's what the policy is. It's nonsensical to say they don't deserve to be in Code S because they in fact got into Code S by playing according to the rules by which you qualify for Code S.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Trsjnica
Profile Joined April 2011
United States477 Posts
December 15 2011 01:44 GMT
#1183
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
December 15 2011 01:45 GMT
#1184
On December 15 2011 10:43 Tula wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:39 dAPhREAk wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:37 ScareCrow` wrote:
Quoted from here

Folks, we're just becoming aware of the decision from GSL. We don't have all the facts yet and are investigating.
Please stay tuned. Thanks,
Lee


Give it time.

that was eight hours ago though.... =(

in all fairness even if Lee was running around doing everything he could it is unlikely that he reached anyone at Gom for at least 5 of those 8 hours considering the timezones.

It is close to 10:45 KST, so even if their office was manned from 8:00 onwards thats 2 hours 45minutes where he could have talked to people.
Let's give him and Gom another few hours before we expect the official word from MLG.

sarcasm doesnt transmit well over the internet. =( i dont expect a response from them today. hopefully tomorrow.
JoeSchmoe
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada2058 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-15 01:47:04
December 15 2011 01:46 GMT
#1185
On December 15 2011 10:44 Trsjnica wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.


where does it say he earned his spot? just because MLG said so? he was being considered under the new format but never earned it officially.
tnud
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden2233 Posts
December 15 2011 01:47 GMT
#1186
On December 15 2011 10:46 JoeSchmoe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:44 Trsjnica wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.


where does it say he earned his spot? just because MLG said so?

Everyone but GOM said he earned his spot. GOM has not said anything regarding it, they can't possibly have missed that every esports forum and site reported it. They got presence here too.
- ಠ_ಠ - | disinfect wrote: AHAHHAHAHA 2DG FUCK ME ALREADY.
Trsjnica
Profile Joined April 2011
United States477 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-15 01:48:25
December 15 2011 01:47 GMT
#1187
On December 15 2011 10:46 JoeSchmoe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:44 Trsjnica wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.


where does it say he earned his spot? just because MLG said so? he was being considered under the new format but never earned it officially.

?

That was the statement I wish GOM had made, not the statement that they actually made.
Golgotha
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Korea (South)8418 Posts
December 15 2011 01:49 GMT
#1188
Guys please don't be blind. Did we not all confirm Naniwa's Code S status months ago? Did we not all cheer as GOM announced DIRECT Code S seeds to appropriately placing MLG contestants? Just 3 days ago there was no DOUBT in our mind that Naniwa was in Code S due to his performances at MLG. Everyone knew this! So why are we now buying into GOM's cop out of saying that Naniwa was never in Code S and that he was just being considered for an invite. Rofl. Please do yourself a favor and go read the past announcements of the GOM and MLG partnership.

And, please don't give me the, "It is a new year herp derp, everything is changed".
battyone
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States180 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-15 01:51:03
December 15 2011 01:50 GMT
#1189
On December 15 2011 10:46 JoeSchmoe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:44 Trsjnica wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.


where does it say he earned his spot? just because MLG said so? he was being considered under the new format but never earned it officially.


http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors3/news/65291

At every 2011 Pro Circuit Live Competition after MLG Columbus, GSL placement will occur as follows:
Code S status will be awarded to the highest placing player, regardless of country of origin, who doesn't already have Code S status. (Leenock 1st place, had Code S so no Code S spot. Naniwa 2nd place, no Code S, Code S Spot)
Let's Go Mets!
JoeSchmoe
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada2058 Posts
December 15 2011 01:50 GMT
#1190
On December 15 2011 10:47 tnud wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:46 JoeSchmoe wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:44 Trsjnica wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.


where does it say he earned his spot? just because MLG said so?

Everyone but GOM said he earned his spot. GOM has not said anything regarding it, they can't possibly have missed that every esports forum and site reported it. They got presence here too.


did it say on PlayXP? did it say on Thisisgame? why would they check every international forum when it's not even their first language?
OhYess
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada41 Posts
December 15 2011 01:50 GMT
#1191
On December 15 2011 06:43 Gin-san wrote:
That's actually a pretty lame response, just like i expected it. They think they're 100% correct and only blame NaNiwa. Hopefully Blizzard won't give the next SC2 contract to you but to KeSPA.


If it was KeSPA who Naniwa did this too, his punishment would be MUCH more severe. KeSPA takes e-sports extremely seriously, and punish ruthlessly. Which I do like in a way.
illsick
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1770 Posts
December 15 2011 01:51 GMT
#1192
On December 15 2011 10:41 ScareCrow` wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:39 Learion wrote:
I dont understand why was Idra informed 1 week ago about his Code S spot and not Naniwa if he was on top of the list before this happened.


They're unrelated.


but they are

if he was at the top of the list, then naniwa would have been informed about his (or possible) code S spot. Instead, it feels like it was a given that naniwa is in code S (through MLG exchange) so no need to be informed that he was in this so-called running spot for it.

(don't know if idra was informed a week ago, just going by what Learion said)
you live and you learn
onetime
Profile Joined February 2011
Belgium25 Posts
December 15 2011 01:51 GMT
#1193
nestea and naniwa where already out of the tournament, they shouldn't even have to play the match to begin with. it would be cool for the viewers to have seen a proper match but i can understand that naniwa doesn't see the point of playing the game if it doesnt result in to anything at all.

tnud
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden2233 Posts
December 15 2011 01:51 GMT
#1194
On December 15 2011 10:50 battyone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:46 JoeSchmoe wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:44 Trsjnica wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.


where does it say he earned his spot? just because MLG said so? he was being considered under the new format but never earned it officially.


http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors3/news/65291

At every 2011 Pro Circuit Live Competition after MLG Columbus, GSL placement will occur as follows:
Code S status will be awarded to the highest placing player, regardless of country of origin, who doesn't already have Code S status.

Before anyone says otherwise, Providence is a part of the Pro Circuit.
http://pro.majorleaguegaming.com/competitions/25
- ಠ_ಠ - | disinfect wrote: AHAHHAHAHA 2DG FUCK ME ALREADY.
Arkless
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada1547 Posts
December 15 2011 01:52 GMT
#1195
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 08:33 Bumblebee wrote:
At every 2011 Pro Circuit Live Competition after MLG Columbus, GSL placement will occur as follows:
  • Code S status will be awarded to the highest placing player, within the Top 3, regardless of country of origin, who does not already have Code S status.

Source (read line 7, 8): http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-and-the-gsl-create-groundbreaking-player-exchange-program

I don't really have anything to say than this particular punishment of NaNiwa, and reasoning for it, is a joke.



1. GSL's stance toward the NaNiWa incident

Not only progamers, but professional athletes in every sports prove and showcase their skill through the game and by doing so entertain their fans. Since professional athletes do this for a living, competing in tournaments is a means to make money in order to sustain themselves. While money is an essential factor in a professional athlete’s life, it is the sincere competitive spirit that enables a mere athlete to become a professional athlete. This spirit entails the will to improve, work hard and try one's best no matter what. It also encompasses a mutual respect between those who share the title of professional athlete, which consequently leads to a certain code of professional conduct. It is this underlying competitive spirit, which goes beyond and is unrelated to any amount of prize money, of every professional athlete that touches and entertains many fans. We believe that the reason why so many people are such avid fans of baseball, soccer or e-sports has next to nothing to do with money. Korean e-sports fans generally share this understanding of the term 'professional athlete’ or in this case 'progamer', and might be less likely to tolerate a deviation from these core values compared to overseas communities.

A lot of people share the opinion that NaNiWa has not broken any rules and should therefore not receive any punishment.

It is true that NaNiWa has not taken actions that break any explicit rules, like for example using a cheat to gain an unfair advantage. NaNiWa has however purposefully not tried his best and shown this in a disrespectful manner. This was not only disappointing for his opponent NesTea and the GSL, but also for the many fans who had anticipated a great match. This behavior does not match with the definition of a progamer as laid out in the paragraph above.

We do however not doubt the sincerity of NaNiWa's competitive spirit. NaNiWa has come the long way to Korea just to compete in the GSL after all. We know very well how hard it is and the determination it takes to come to a foreign country and take the challenge to compete.

We want to make clear that NaNiWa will not be banned from the GSL for his actions. We will however revoke his candidacy for a Code S seed, which means that he will have to requalify for the GSL.


2. Doesn't that mean that the GSL is depriving NaNiWa of a Code S seed that he rightfully earned?

It seems like a lot of people have been under the impression that NaNiWa has received a Code S seed for taking 2nd place at MLG Providence. The truth however is that NaNiWa has received the right to compete in the Blizzard Cup for his 2nd place achievement at MLG Providence.

We have introduced our new format for the 2012 GSL Tour a while ago, which includes changes to the way international seeds are being given out. Since we have not explained these changes to the seeds in detail yet, this misunderstanding seems to have arisen.

In 2012 the GSL will have 2 Code S sponsor seeds. These seeds will be determined by outstanding results in international tournaments. In 2011 the GSL schedule luckily matched very well with MLG's schedule. For this reason we were able to introduce a system that allowed high-placing players at MLG to compete in the following GSL season in a regular manner. In 2012 we will again do our best to provide a schedule that matches well with MLG and other international leagues. As the GSL format has changed and a season now lasts for significantly longer, it will this time however not be possible to perfectly match our schedule with MLG's. Apart from that we would also like to consider players of other remarkable tournaments and have therefore introduced this change to our international seeding system.

NaNiWa has been considered as one of the players to receive a Code S seed for the 2012 GSL Season 1 as a part of the this new seeding system due to his recent impressive results. Other players under consideration were IdrA (MLG Orlando 4th, IEM Guangzhou) and Sen (Blizzcon Battle.net Invitational 3rd) among others. During this phase of consideration aforementioned incident happened, which led us to the decision to remove NaNiWa from the top of the list of considered players. This is not to be seen as a direct punishment resulting from the incident, the incident did however understandably have an influence on NaNiWa's position on the list of candidates.

What we would like to ask from all of the GSL fans is to not simply see this incident as just a simple meaningless single game between NaNiWa and NesTea. The act of purposefully losing a match, whatever the underlying reasons may be, does always also have a psychological effect on the other players. By tolerating such behavior, purposefully losing might be deemed as a legitimate action and we might see more of such matches in the future, which is something that surely neither the fans nor the players would appreciate.

Both Korean as well as international fans are important to us. We hope that no one gets the wrong picture and believes that NaNiWa is being treated disadvantageously because he is a foreigner. On the contrary, if a Korean had been involved in a similar incident, it is possible that a much harsher reaction would have followed. It is also very likely that the player's team would have taken firm action before the GSL could have even reacted to it.

The GSL is a tournament that is open for fans and players from all over the world. We are lucky to live in the internet era, which allows us to easily connect and share our passions. At the same time, we have to live with the time difference and can experience an interesting mix but sometimes also clash of cultures. We would be very happy to be able to always satisfy everyone, but unfortunately that is not realistically possible. We would like everyone to know that we tried to make a fair decision to the best of our ability in this unfortunate situation.

We promise that we will work hard to provide tournament formats that will lead players to do their best in every match and to create a GSL that will allow fans to enjoy and experience the competition as something that has more to it than just professionals trying to make a living.

We wish NaNiWa all the best for his future endeavors as a progamer.

Thank you.
GOMTV.net

Original post: http://www.gomtv.net/forum/view.gom?topicid=212470&cid=0&kind=8


I have bolded some key points within the spoiler.

Anyways though here is my two cents.
Naniwa's attitude towards the whole thing. literally disgusts me. You play a fucking video game for a living, and you can't play a showmatch for your fans? Personally, I would pay money out of my own pockey just to play against Nestea, so for him to just throw his match it's a spit in the face to not only me, but his team, his fans, and most importantly himself. He basically said to his fans, and his team who spent time hyping the match up.

"Screw you guys, I only care about me"

I think InControl put it best last night during his rant on SOTG, and him and I couldn't be more on the same page. FUCK THAT. You're suppose to be a professional aren't you? Then act like one! NHL,NFL,MLB,MLS, etc etc etc etc all have matches coming close to playoff season that for some teams, doesn't matter if they win or lose they are out regardless. Yet we see them play to there best regardless because they are PROFESSIONALS. So when you say, "oh that's just naniwa" Not only do you sell yourself short, but it sells esports short as a whole. No one would want to invest in an industry that is full of weak minded quitters, and in my opinion that is what Naniwa showed us on the GSL. Might be a bit harsh, but it's truly how I feel as someone who would love to swap spots with him anyday of the week. Come swing a hammer and build houses in my sted for 40hrs+ a week, and Ill play nestea all the "pointless" matches in the world, and with a smile.
http://www.mixcloud.com/Arkless/ http://www.soundcloud.com/Arkless
EchoZ
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Japan5041 Posts
December 15 2011 01:52 GMT
#1196
What a good response
Dear Sixsmith...
synaptik
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada644 Posts
December 15 2011 01:52 GMT
#1197
all you people threatening to not buy GSL tickets are hilarious. you're all going to be watching the rest of blizz cup, and you'll all be back for GSL jan. don't lie to yourself.

if anything GOMtv just got more respect from the rest of us for putting their foot down and making an example out of this kid. at least we won't be seeing dumb probe rushes anymore.
diophan
Profile Joined September 2011
United States1018 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-15 01:54:09
December 15 2011 01:53 GMT
#1198
Okay, so based on everything that's been written, this is the most reasonable thing I came up with:

For whatever reason MLG and GOM decided they didn't want the partnership anymore, hence GOM saying they were changing it for 2012. MLG announces they are paying for 4 GSL players to play at providence:

http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mc-mma-bomber-and-mvp-to-mlg-providence

However, the Player Exchange Program would have meant they were all placed in the championship bracket, which MVP was not. I know MMA and Bomber were placed in championship because of their previous MLG performance. It's quite possible MC was as well, but I'm not sure about that.

I am almost sure MLG paid for travel for all players seeded in the championship bracket, so they were supposed to pay for MMA, Bomber, and MC anyway. In the QxG and IM partnership, it was said that QxG was paying for Nestea and MVP to participate in MLG. So I don't think MLG is being truthful when they say those players were there through the exchange program.

GOM and MLG came to some sort of internal agreement where MLG could say Nani was getting his Code S spot from Providence because GOM was going to give a seed to a top foreigner anyway. Then Nani's antics in the Blizzard Cup happen, GOM no longer wants to give one of their 2 foreigner seeds to Nani, and a shitstorm ensues.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
December 15 2011 01:53 GMT
#1199
On December 15 2011 10:51 illsick wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:41 ScareCrow` wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:39 Learion wrote:
I dont understand why was Idra informed 1 week ago about his Code S spot and not Naniwa if he was on top of the list before this happened.


They're unrelated.


but they are

if he was at the top of the list, then naniwa would have been informed about his (or possible) code S spot. Instead, it feels like it was a given that naniwa is in code S (through MLG exchange) so no need to be informed that he was in this so-called running spot for it.

(don't know if idra was informed a week ago, just going by what Learion said)

or maybe they had decided idra for sure, but the debate was ongoing related to naniwa/sen. then, after the present debacle they decided sen wins over naniwa for the spot and they announced sen as the winner. speculation is fun.
JoeSchmoe
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada2058 Posts
December 15 2011 01:53 GMT
#1200
On December 15 2011 10:50 battyone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 10:46 JoeSchmoe wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:44 Trsjnica wrote:
On December 15 2011 10:42 jetz0r wrote:
I have 2 competing feelings on the situation.

1. The punishment against Naniwa is proportionate and fair.

2. The way that GOM arrived at the punishment is flawed. Their reasoning is confusing and is based on things that clearly does not match up with what the public thought. Everyone thought Naniwa had earned a Code S spot, yet GOM deny this.

So we need to ask ourselves, what is more important: That a player who has done wrong is punished appropriately, even if the rules don't cover it? OR that GOM, the premier competition in SC2, has a more transparant and objective system in place to punish players.


I agree with this. GOM's statement is a nice story, but I would rather that they simply say, "Naniwa earned this spot in MLG. However, he lost it due to his conduct."

Suggesting Naniwa hadn't really earned his spot yet seems a bit... revisionist history.


where does it say he earned his spot? just because MLG said so? he was being considered under the new format but never earned it officially.


http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors3/news/65291

At every 2011 Pro Circuit Live Competition after MLG Columbus, GSL placement will occur as follows:
Code S status will be awarded to the highest placing player, regardless of country of origin, who doesn't already have Code S status. (Leenock 1st place, had Code S so no Code S spot. Naniwa 2nd place, no Code S, Code S Spot)


like i said before this was national championship event and did not fall under the GSL/MLG exchange program. Why do you assume that the Code S spot condition must be met when the following wasn't?

MLG will invite four Korean pro players to each Pro Circuit Live Competition.
These players will be placed directly into the Championship Pools, one into each Pool.
Their placement in the Pools will be determined by their GSL rank.


taken from the same source.
Prev 1 58 59 60 61 62 121 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 9m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko427
LamboSC2 427
gerald23 47
MindelVK 32
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 29869
Calm 4697
Shuttle 1141
Larva 793
Mini 568
firebathero 356
Rush 335
PianO 309
Light 270
Snow 201
[ Show more ]
hero 134
Movie 95
Mong 54
JYJ37
soO 27
JulyZerg 24
HiyA 22
Sacsri 21
Terrorterran 18
yabsab 10
Dota 2
Gorgc5693
qojqva2469
Dendi1098
420jenkins280
BananaSlamJamma185
Counter-Strike
fl0m7792
zeus1160
markeloff113
Other Games
B2W.Neo1312
hiko681
Hui .376
DeMusliM280
QueenE139
KnowMe135
Liquid`VortiX123
RotterdaM108
Mew2King105
ArmadaUGS47
oskar36
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 9
lovetv 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 9
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2642
• WagamamaTV671
• Noizen57
League of Legends
• Nemesis3069
• Jankos2102
• TFBlade866
Upcoming Events
StarCraft2.fi
1h 9m
PiGosaur Monday
9h 9m
Wardi Open
20h 9m
StarCraft2.fi
1d 1h
Replay Cast
1d 8h
The PondCast
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
SC Evo League
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
4 days
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
OSC
4 days
Solar vs Creator
ByuN vs Gerald
Percival vs Babymarine
Moja vs Krystianer
EnDerr vs ForJumy
sebesdes vs Nicoract
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
BSL 21
5 days
Bonyth vs StRyKeR
Tarson vs Dandy
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
StarCraft2.fi
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-28
RSL Revival: Season 3
Light HT

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
Acropolis #4 - TS3
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
Kuram Kup
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.