|
On December 13 2011 23:52 LanTAs wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 23:49 SoylentCreep wrote:On December 13 2011 23:46 mcmartini wrote:On December 13 2011 23:42 SoylentCreep wrote:On December 13 2011 23:39 mcmartini wrote:On December 13 2011 23:38 SoylentCreep wrote:On December 13 2011 23:35 Neotik wrote:On December 13 2011 23:26 Liquid`Tyler wrote:On December 13 2011 23:12 zul wrote: Naniwa responds on twitter: "apparently people got upset when i probe rushed nestea, the game was pointless and it couldnt change anything in the tournament."
people who bought the HD Pass just to see good games from him, will not approve of this behavior. The people who bought the HD Pass knew the format of the tournament and knew that it allowed for inconsequential games. Without the incentive of winning a tournament, progamers should not try to win. No one is good enough to waste their best effort on inconsequential games, especially with how many major tournaments there are nowadays. Whatever the best strategy Naniwa had in mind for the game, he should not use it. What irrational people want and expect is for the players to put on a false show of a competition, where they both seem to be trying enough for viewers to successfully suspend their disbelief. Such people don't constitute a significant enough part of the community to justify this huge reaction. this. I don't think people are focusing enough on the circumstances that allowed this to happen: a faulty and confusing tournament format. Sure Naniwa is known to BM, but not placing any of the blame on the tourney organizers is a bit delusional. Naniwa knew the format beforehand...everybody knew. He could have declined. But just giving up as soon as there's no way to win at a faultily organized tournament is just unprofessional. How do you know he didn't decline and was forced to play anyway? For the record, Code S Up and Down always had inconsequential games not being played, I see no reason why it shouldn't have been the same for this tournament. Yeah right. You qualified for the probably most prestigous( or at least hardest to get in ) tournament of the year and you decline because you don't like the format. I'm pretty sure that's it--- you're a genius. I quite clearly meant decline to play the game vs Nestea, as my next sentence shows. The sarcasm and rudeness is noted. And I cleary meant to decline playing in the tournament. See? That's exactly what i meant when i said that his behavior is unprofessional. "No chance to win teh moneyz? Awww fuck it, i don't give a shit!" Attitudes like that are bad for e-sports, and will not help e-sports getting accepted as a true profession. Or maybe they don't understand the pro player. Nani can do whatever the fuck he wants, its his spot in the tournament that was earned and his to throw away.
Since Naniwa qualified through legit channels, he has the right to play however he wants (barring any match fixing) and I doubt he will face any penalty; but this still does not change the fact that it was a poor representations of the foreign players In Korea and this could have repercussions for future Code A spots. GomTV has time and again forwarded Code A invites to foreigners who, unlike Naniwa, have not necessarily qualified through appropriate channels (for e.g. Sase recently) out of good faith. However, Naniwa's attitude and subsequent Korean reaction does not necessarily bode well for such goodwill foreigner spots in the future.
|
blame gom's stupid format not naniwa, reading this thread you would have thought he just raped somebody, chill the fuck out guys, also that article is horrible and they need to improve their syntax
|
On December 13 2011 23:57 ChimRichalds wrote: Very immature from Naniwa. How can you have respect for this guy after he acts like a kid throwing a tantrum after losing some games? It's been said before, but just because you cant win the tournament doesn't mean you don't have a responsibility to your sponsors and fans to play your best every game. Shameful.
Read this:
On December 13 2011 23:26 Liquid`Tyler wrote: The people who bought the HD Pass knew the format of the tournament and knew that it allowed for inconsequential games. Without the incentive of winning a tournament, progamers should not try to win. No one is good enough to waste their best effort on inconsequential games, especially with how many major tournaments there are nowadays. Whatever the best strategy Naniwa had in mind for the game, he should not use it. What irrational people want and expect is for the players to put on a false show of a competition, where they both seem to be trying enough for viewers to successfully suspend their disbelief. Such people don't constitute a significant enough part of the community to justify this huge reaction.
|
|
On December 13 2011 23:55 dafunk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 23:49 decerto wrote:On December 13 2011 23:45 dafunk wrote:On December 13 2011 23:42 snailz wrote:On December 13 2011 23:40 Tristran wrote: I'm actually disappointed at the people (and even player/s) who think this isn't a big deal.
I noted Tylers response that showing their top play in unimportant games is not worth it, yes I agree. What I will also remind everyone of is that eSports as a whole is funded largely by Sponsors. Without sponsors none of this would happen. Do any of you honestly think that any sponsor would want their name all over the atrocious behavior and complete lack of game that was played by Naniwa?
If you want prize money. If you want big viewer numbers. If you want to be famous. Then you need to act professional. I'm sorry but there is absolutely no place for Naniwa's behavior in tournaments such as the GSL. sponsors love publicity shit like this brings publicity sponsor actually get to see their investment pay off naniwa remains bad guy, life goes on everybody happy... You re delusional if you think sponsors love that kind of publicity. Its like saying Tiger Woods sex scandal was good for his sponsors. On December 13 2011 23:42 Gowerly wrote: To all the people throwing sport analogies around: Football (soccer) teams routinely throw out a reserve/B team whenever there's a game they don't care about. sending out a B team is like going for a fun strategy that still has a chance to win you the game. You re out of your mind if you think probe rushing and playing with a B team is the same thing. Well say if Andorra have a euro quals game in 1 week and they have a friendly(a game with 0 consequence) with Brazil this week and Brazil really wants to win for whatever reason like nestea did, Andorra sending out their b has probably the same chance of winning as a probe rush. Its quite easy to draw fairly exact parallels that arn't made a big deal out of in sports But they still fucking play the game. They don't have a choice. There's no limit to the number of goals or anything. I'm confident in a group stage game that no longer matters, if there was an option to just lose 10-0 as fast as possible and the game to be over they would take it. However, the games must be 90 minutes long so there's no choice but to play. Anyway, the point stands: The game will be bad, not entertaining, and pointless to watch. Sure, match fitness or whatever, but that's not the point. The point is that people are complaining that they were cheated out of a game, and the same will happen there. The game itself will just be terrible.
Edit: Also, in these matches, people pay BY THE GAME to watch. If SC2 tournaments charged for a seat to a game (or series of games) in that fashion they would be laughed off the planet. However, on the off-chance that it happened, THEN it would have been unprofessional for Nani to do that.
|
this article is bullshit in my opinion, people are making a huge deal out of that. coca's matchfixing was much bigger (in a match that mattered) and if GOM had used a reasonable format, those games wouldnt even have been played.
i guess it's really a culture thing, but reactions like choya's are just unreasonable and people from the western world have no reason to be upset at all.
|
On December 13 2011 23:55 snailz wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 23:46 quancer wrote:On December 13 2011 23:42 snailz wrote:On December 13 2011 23:40 Tristran wrote: I'm actually disappointed at the people (and even player/s) who think this isn't a big deal.
I noted Tylers response that showing their top play in unimportant games is not worth it, yes I agree. What I will also remind everyone of is that eSports as a whole is funded largely by Sponsors. Without sponsors none of this would happen. Do any of you honestly think that any sponsor would want their name all over the atrocious behavior and complete lack of game that was played by Naniwa?
If you want prize money. If you want big viewer numbers. If you want to be famous. Then you need to act professional. I'm sorry but there is absolutely no place for Naniwa's behavior in tournaments such as the GSL. sponsors love publicity shit like this brings publicity sponsor actually get to see their investment pay off naniwa remains bad guy, life goes on everybody happy... No, everybody is not happy. Smart investors understand this sort of stupid drama and unprofessionalism undermines the integrity of the game and threatens its long term sustainability. Do you really think sponsors are as so stupid and short-sighted as to think a short-term spike like this is always a positive thing? Anyway, the whole "No such thing as bad publicity" line is a lie. Ask any publicist and they'll tell you what the difference is, and how important it is to avoid bad publicity. Think for yourselves, goddammit. investors don't care about game's long term sustainability, they care about their exposure to their respective markets via that game (and right now the game is bringing them desired attention, so all is good) on the other hand if the game itself suffers because short-term spikes like these are negative thing, the investors (sponsors) will just jump to the next game that has their "wanted demographics" (hard to translate this into english for me, sorry) but the game wont suffer, dont worry. you wouldnt be here right now if it wasnt for Naniwa, discussing starcraft2, its leagues and players, and their sponsors. so it's a good thing, relax. also for the last paragraph you made: you're not a publicist, nor am i. i also doubt you know any professional publcist, so it's silly for us two to discuss if "no such thing as bad publicity" is a lie ;-) while i agree that there actually is bad kind of publicity, this is definately not it. someone mentioned tiger woods sex scandal, that would be it ;-)
I do know publicists. A very close family friend of mine is one--I wouldn't have suggested what I did otherwise.
Anyway, when I say sponsors I'm talking about the only ones that matter: long-term, major sponsors, with a lot of money invested. What I'm saying is that the kind of sponsors a game needs in order to maintain long-term success are not happy about events that undermine the credibility of the sport they're invested in. Yes, Naniwa's caused a lot of controversy which has riled up you, me, and the community and certainly an increase in activity has occurred, but if this sort of thing keeps up there will not even be a medium left for any kind of nonsense.
I've already written a lot on TL today on this very topic. I'll leave it at this because I no longer have the energy to keep it up. My apologies. If you wish, we can continue in PMs where I can link you to what I've written that pertains to this and so on, and etc.
|
On December 13 2011 23:56 Weemoed wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 23:55 MildSeven wrote: People who thinks this is ok absolutely fails to understand the east asian perspective. Well, he's not Korean, and it's an international tournament, so? The tournament's hosted in Korea, although international. It's like having players go to Athens for Olympics and then pissing on the greek statues (just an extreme case of not viewing things from other people's culture perspective). No one was asking Naniwa to honour-kill some woman or something, not that kind of irrational adherence to another culture, but i think holding up the integrity of a competitive game that is highly valued in someone else's country is the minimal amount of respect one can give.
|
On December 13 2011 23:34 Sabersharp wrote:
IF you are from South Korea,you should know that Korean take gaming very seriously and dun tolerate this type of thing even when you are throwing a game that doesn't matter against Nestea.
Koreans emphasize A LOT on professionalism and respect in sc2 and also in their culture.Foreigners may take this and say"meh it was a pointless game so he throwed it away"but Koreans look at differently and say you cant have that.
okay.. thanks for reming me..
|
On December 14 2011 00:02 quancer wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 23:55 snailz wrote:On December 13 2011 23:46 quancer wrote:On December 13 2011 23:42 snailz wrote:On December 13 2011 23:40 Tristran wrote: I'm actually disappointed at the people (and even player/s) who think this isn't a big deal.
I noted Tylers response that showing their top play in unimportant games is not worth it, yes I agree. What I will also remind everyone of is that eSports as a whole is funded largely by Sponsors. Without sponsors none of this would happen. Do any of you honestly think that any sponsor would want their name all over the atrocious behavior and complete lack of game that was played by Naniwa?
If you want prize money. If you want big viewer numbers. If you want to be famous. Then you need to act professional. I'm sorry but there is absolutely no place for Naniwa's behavior in tournaments such as the GSL. sponsors love publicity shit like this brings publicity sponsor actually get to see their investment pay off naniwa remains bad guy, life goes on everybody happy... No, everybody is not happy. Smart investors understand this sort of stupid drama and unprofessionalism undermines the integrity of the game and threatens its long term sustainability. Do you really think sponsors are as so stupid and short-sighted as to think a short-term spike like this is always a positive thing? Anyway, the whole "No such thing as bad publicity" line is a lie. Ask any publicist and they'll tell you what the difference is, and how important it is to avoid bad publicity. Think for yourselves, goddammit. investors don't care about game's long term sustainability, they care about their exposure to their respective markets via that game (and right now the game is bringing them desired attention, so all is good) on the other hand if the game itself suffers because short-term spikes like these are negative thing, the investors (sponsors) will just jump to the next game that has their "wanted demographics" (hard to translate this into english for me, sorry) but the game wont suffer, dont worry. you wouldnt be here right now if it wasnt for Naniwa, discussing starcraft2, its leagues and players, and their sponsors. so it's a good thing, relax. also for the last paragraph you made: you're not a publicist, nor am i. i also doubt you know any professional publcist, so it's silly for us two to discuss if "no such thing as bad publicity" is a lie ;-) while i agree that there actually is bad kind of publicity, this is definately not it. someone mentioned tiger woods sex scandal, that would be it ;-) I do know publicists. A very close family friend of mine is one--I wouldn't have suggested what I did otherwise. Anyway, when I say sponsors I'm talking about the only ones that matter: long-term, major sponsors, with a lot of money invested. What I'm saying is that the kind of sponsors a game needs in order to maintain long-term success are not happy about events that undermine the credibility of the sport they're invested in. Yes, Naniwa's caused a lot of controversy which has riled up you, me, and the community and certainly an increase in activity has occurred, but if this sort of thing keeps up there will not even be a medium left for any kind of nonsense. I've already written a lot on TL today on this very topic. I'll leave it at this because I no longer have the energy to keep it up. My apologies. If you wish, we can continue in PMs where I can link you to what I've written that pertains to this and so on, and etc.
such nice manner :-)
|
This incident should serve as a stern warning to Naniwa and other players to not throw games in large tournaments
Even if this was an inconsequential game, the idea behind any game is to respect your opponent. One is expected to play to their best of their ability in a friendly game with nothing at stake, so why does this not apply in a huge tournament setting? Naniwa, understandably, was tilting after 3 successive losses, but he still had to play the game vs Nestea to the best of his ability,not only because his team (especially after Quantic hyped the game on Twitter), his sponsors, his fans and most importantly the tournament organisers expect him to do so, but also because Nestea was playing the game seriously. Because he made the choice of throwing the game, he lost the respect of not only his fans, but also of his fellow peers in Korea who take e-sports seriously.
Simply put, he was frustrated and made the wrong choice. He obviously shouldn't be punished for this as it was not stated in the rules, but nevertheless, he should come out and apologize if he ever wants to be respected by the Korean players and tournament organisers.
Or he could argue that he was trying to counter a 6 pool. Either way is fine by me.
|
i dont think what Naniwa did was THAT HUGE but still a bit disrespectful for people taking their time off to watch these games
|
On December 13 2011 23:57 moonmeh wrote: To those who are painting us as hating Naniwa as a whole stop it. The Korean community is also divided over matter much like TL and reddit. Most agree what Naniwa did stupid but some people like me think this whole thing is beyond ridiculous. I mean this article is so biased and lacks in objectivity that I can't take it serious. All it does is inflame the community due it's biased words. +1
|
i feel it's even more retarded of gom that they asked them to play the match even if it had no meaning. naniwa did what he wanted, maybe he should have made a double gate zealot proxy, even if it had no chance to work either, some noobs would of keep their mouthes shut.
|
Anyone remember that Idra refused to play one of his matches and DQ'd himself? He just didn't see the point? He's done it more than once. You do know Idra got shit for that, so Naniwa also is going to get shit for this, but seriously that seems one sided as if the person who wrote this already disliked Naniwa.
If I were Naniwa I wouldn't have done it, but the guy won a lot of competitions and finished in the top in even more. Anyway gl, I've never really been his fan, but this was his choice and if he chooses to make fans like this or lose fans like this it's up to him. He's still young people. He's not Boxers or WhiteRa's age.
|
No wonder he wanted out of the MVP house, for them to tweet that is like adding gasoline to a fire, must not have been a friendly place to stay. And saying like its a big thing for Nestea to practice on his birthday? I work on my birthday man, I don't get special treatment and stop working on birthdays, grow up.
He gave 3 good games and crucified for the last one. the reaction is just ridiculous, cant wait for the Code S selection, Koreans will be gunning for Naniwa, I've got your back Nani!
|
EBUSHIDO code strikes again. Also one thing about choya
FXOChoya
lol I can only laugh that bastard (T/N: probably the mild translation of 새끼) is a pro-gamer
Rock-paper-scissors much? Good thing he can call out others when he did something stupid in past
|
Yes it was immature and stupid but the guy just saw his dream fall into pieces minutes ago. Emotions run very high sometimes. With all the hate he's getting and losing the tournament he's already been punished enough. Stop being so melodramatic. One guy did something dumb in a game. E-sports is not weak. A little incident like this cannot KILL E-SPORTS!!11!
|
Bullshit, everyone knows that even in Bo3/Bo5/Bo7 if the opponent is dominating you tend to slump and play progressively bad. For instance in GSL finals if you see a guy going up 3 games immediately chances are it will finish 4-0 cause the last game is pretty much thrown away since the dude i mentally damaged for that period of time. It's frigging psycology, Naniwa is known for not having a strong mindset therefore he is inclined to do this shit. The match was worthless and I did not see people get pissed at OGS INCA for going dark templar expand 4 games in a row in a gSL final and getting absolutely RAPED by Nestea, isn't that ruining the game for the fans? Isn't that a way to throw the game just like worker rushing is? Are koreans bloody whiners who ALWAYS and I repeat ALWAYS make drama over stupid shit, like that Jinro joke with a bad work at the end on TV? The answer to these questions is yes.
|
On December 13 2011 23:57 Russano wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 23:26 Liquid`Tyler wrote:On December 13 2011 23:12 zul wrote: Naniwa responds on twitter: "apparently people got upset when i probe rushed nestea, the game was pointless and it couldnt change anything in the tournament."
people who bought the HD Pass just to see good games from him, will not approve of this behavior. The people who bought the HD Pass knew the format of the tournament and knew that it allowed for inconsequential games. Without the incentive of winning a tournament, progamers should not try to win. No one is good enough to waste their best effort on inconsequential games, especially with how many major tournaments there are nowadays. Whatever the best strategy Naniwa had in mind for the game, he should not use it. What irrational people want and expect is for the players to put on a false show of a competition, where they both seem to be trying enough for viewers to successfully suspend their disbelief. Such people don't constitute a significant enough part of the community to justify this huge reaction. ^ What tyler said. You people are absolutely full of shit and massively self entitled. The first and foremost reason ANYONE plays this game, is for themselves. Whether for money, for fun, or for some other reason. I certainly play this game for fun, and nobody, absolutley nobody, is able to force me to play it to "entertain them". I don't care whether you dropped 1,000 dollars bettting on the game, or paid 30 dollars for a vod of it, the game is what is is. Players should always have the right to forfeit their matches. It's absolutley absurd to REQUIRE someone to play an actual match. Now, if you have rules in place to penalize someone for not playing a match, then by all means, go ahead and give him punishment. However, those rules dont' exist, so get off your high horse, he didn't do anything wrong. I've thrown games on ladder before, I've had at least 20 games, where I was in a bad mood, and saw the 9th protoss in a row, said fuck it, and just left. Somtimes you don't want to play a game for whatever reason, and expecting someone, who is one of the most exclusively competitive players in our community, to play a game he gives no shits about, for YOUR benefit, and when he doesn't you bitch and moan about how slighted you are? How self entitled can you get? As for the actual game itself. Do you know what my reaction was? I laughed. I thought it was a funny strat to throw out in a throw away game. If it was Huk it might of been a mothership rush, if it was TLO it would of been an 8 Rax. WHo the fuck are you to decided what's a funny acceptable joke strat, and what's not? Just because the weird thing happened at 4 seconds instead of 4 minutes doesn't make it, any less or any more of a joke strat. He did something mildly entertaining instead of playing a match that could of looked like any other shitty 2 base all in. Would you have been happier if it had just been a straight forfeit? Mind you, he probably asked for just that. You're not entitled to an epic Nestea vs Naniwa rivalry game, any more then I was entitled to seeing a cool MVP vs Hero match, that ended up being a stupid 3 rax scv pull. As many others has mentioned, there have been numerous cases of things like this, whether its the Stephano/bratok, or Stephano/cloud thing, or the Idra IPL3 group stages. People throw matches for various reasonns, and as long as its within the rules and not in some sort of gambling/matchfixing reason, then its perfectly acceptable. Just because you didn't get to watch your shitty starcraft game, doesn't mean punishments should be handed because you feel "disrespected", when you certainly shouldn't even feel that way. Having said this, I'm in no way a fan of Naniwa, I never have been. I don't like his play and think its one dimensional, and not nearly macro oriented for my taste, and personally I think he's a douche. But this incident has absolutely know bearing on that, and what he did is absolutely acceptable. I do feel a bit bat for Quantic, as they hyped the match 5 minutes before it began, then had to facepalm at the result. But thats between Naniwa and Quantic, it's absolutely none of your spectator business. This article is blatantly biased, and crowd reactions obviously weren't like that. It's fairly obvious Naniwa and the MVP team never got along in the first place, and is probably another reason why he shifted away from Complexity, so I'm not surprised they are the ones bitching about this. Whereas most of the other reactions seem to....LOL WTF WAS THAT. I don't even know why this article was posted in the first place, which is the fault of thisisgame, and not the translator/OP. You need to quit blowing up drama just because you think Naniwa is an assclown.
Honestly i think you're full of shit. I don't give a shit about your ladder "experience", but you know in the world of professionalism the word "fun" hardly exists. Do you think a manager is doing his stressful work day after day for the fun of it? Or a football player? Or the cleaning lady cleaning away other peoples piss and shit? No, they all do it for the money, and that's just how the world works.
I agree on the non-existing rules. Things need to be clear. That can lead to rediculous incidents like the "ppp disqualification" but things need to be written down. Also the article is shit, just like Naniwa's behavior.
And please, please dude, don't compare a probe rush (against zerg!) with "funny" but semi-viable joke strategies like BC rush and the likes.
|
|
|
|