1v1 Season 4 map pool did change ! - Page 44
Forum Index > SC2 General |
SnipedSoul
Canada2158 Posts
| ||
DisaFear
Australia4074 Posts
![]() | ||
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
| ||
xlava
United States676 Posts
Thanks for getting rid of all the shitty maps blizz ![]() | ||
IcedBacon
Canada906 Posts
| ||
MajorityofOne
Canada2506 Posts
| ||
Megaman_X
United States164 Posts
| ||
BBQSAC
Australia89 Posts
On October 26 2011 13:32 Megaman_X wrote: as a zerg player, i dunno whether to downvote xelnaga or antiga. any suggestions? Ditch Xel'Naga, its a bugger against a decent terran and i like antiga, it feels cozy with that easy third early | ||
suejak
Japan545 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 26 2011 13:32 Megaman_X wrote: as a zerg player, i dunno whether to downvote xelnaga or antiga. any suggestions? download xelnaga its a headache and makes me cry whenever i play on it. | ||
vincom2
Singapore1775 Posts
| ||
101toss
3232 Posts
| ||
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
![]() | ||
gn1k
United States441 Posts
| ||
Geovu
Estonia1344 Posts
On October 26 2011 12:01 Executor1 wrote: so they added 1 map and took out 3? thats kind of lame, if i didnt want to play those maps i could have just vetod them, i dont think many ppl would veto many (if any) of the maps currently in the new map pool. I'm still using 2 vetoes. Season 3 map pool was worse than season 1 IMO just b/c of the way the metagame has evolved. This is the first time I have ever had a free veto, which means if I get tired of a map (Probably Antiga or Tal Darim) then I actually don't have to play it if I don't want to. If the map pool is too big then it is simply too hard on the player to figure out what to do on every single map. It's like 8 maps now? IMO being physically required to play more than 5 would be just unfair, it's too much variation. All the power to the people who like variation, they don't have to veto anything as none of the maps are utterly god awful anymore. The problem was that if you didn't want to play on those maps you still had to, 3 vetoes wasn't anywhere near enough, esp with close position shattered. On October 26 2011 14:41 docvoc wrote: WHY WOULD THEY ADD METAL?? don't get me wrong i loved that map, but the game is not balanced for it anymore. Even with far spawns, everyone knows that favors zerg heavily and close spawn favors terran heavily. I'm so very confused ![]() Notice how you are actually able to veto the maps you don't want to play. Say they added metal, didn't get rid of close positions and didn't remove other 3 maps? I'm assuming you didn't like ALL of the 4 new ones, so really you are screwed when it comes to choice. Everyone has different opinions and the veto let's people do what they prefer and still have an enjoyable experience. | ||
Twistacles
Canada1327 Posts
I can't think of which map to downvote, which is a good thing. | ||
pm_squad
Mexico180 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
Bswhunter
Australia954 Posts
| ||
Aterons_toss
Romania1275 Posts
We finally have a tournament like map pool :D Xel Nerazim and AC are still kinda bad imo but 3 veto are 3 veto and there is no close pos anymore. | ||
| ||