EPT
StarCraft II Development History - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
| ||
|
Cuiu
Germany410 Posts
On October 23 2011 16:20 enzym wrote: The low quality of the models aside, I love the old style of the Terran buildings. It looks so much more like BW. Instead they changed it to the same style they have in WoW and WC3, which is much more comic-ish. I never understood Blizzard's obsession with making everything look like "cool" toys, at the cost of completely abandoning the original atmosphere, look and feel of their games. So sad. i dont agreee with that. BW"or the first build of sc2" looks so bulky and the proportion are weird i like the sc2 style more To the video its awesome to get such inside in to the development stages. 20k builds?wtf ^^ the Creep one is my favorite part "thats what happens when you put a bunch of programmers in a room without an artist" :D | ||
|
taintmachine
United States431 Posts
| ||
|
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
On October 23 2011 16:27 Cuiu wrote: "thats what happens when you put a bunch of programmers in a room without an artist" :D You get purple spraypaint. :p On October 23 2011 16:28 taintmachine wrote: zealots looked better w/ brighter arm blades or whatever Psi blades. | ||
|
dLKnighT
Canada735 Posts
| ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
In retail SC2, air units clip into each other rather than stacking, so the first build was rather fascinating to look at. | ||
|
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
On October 23 2011 16:27 Cuiu wrote: i dont agreee with that. BW"or the first build of sc2" looks so bulky and the proportion are weird i like the sc2 style more The low quality of the models aside That's why explicitly stated the above, to make sure that people won't fail to differentiate the two. | ||
|
rebuffering
Canada2436 Posts
| ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On October 23 2011 16:38 rebuffering wrote: do they seriously want me to pay 40$ to watch the whole vods, thats ridiculous, id love to watch the panels as a whole, but i mean, thats just crazy, or am i just crazy? I think there are already vods on Youtube for parts of the panels. The multiplayer panel definitely has whole vods floating around. As for the mapmaking/DotA panel, you can watch the entire presentation on Youtube: + Show Spoiler + http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCi8O3nMU6w The art and technology panel has yet to be uploaded in its entirety, though you can piece it together from the videos in this article: http://www.sc2mapster.com/announcements/blizz-con-2011/ | ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
| ||
|
Skullflower
United States3779 Posts
On October 23 2011 15:58 Daralii wrote: What do you mean by "rumored?" There's a third-party BW remake, but I doubt Blizz will ever make one. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145316 I think he's making reference to this + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://media.mmo-champion.com/images/news/2010/november/blizzardslate.jpg) | ||
|
InPlainSight
New Zealand40 Posts
20k builds?wtf ^^ That essentially means there have been 20k code submissions to their repository. When you consider that this is over the course of 4 years it's not that ridiculous. | ||
|
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
| ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10366 Posts
On October 23 2011 16:00 l3lackjax wrote: SC2 as itself is fine, that's in no way being 'greedy'. It's the fact that they're scared to support their game, tournaments, and generally just normal players because of pirates. Most developers nowadays know their game, if it is on the PC, will be pirated. They don't necessarily exclude such a big feature as LAN because of it. Blizzard already gets enough money as it is anyways, even if their sales did drop, they could recover. The reason why I mentioned B.net 2.0 is because it's so closed off. You play by Blizzard's rules, even if they aren't accommodating in say, a tournament setting. Once again you do not address my argument... once again you are saying they do not deserve their sales. This means that you support pirating. Bnet 2.0 still doesn't have anything to do with this... if there is LAN, it means they do not have to use Bnet 2.0, which is what you want. And then there will be piraters. It doesn't justify breaking the law just because you're unhappy with the product. | ||
|
ch33psh33p
7650 Posts
| ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
| ||
|
whatthefat
United States918 Posts
| ||
|
edc
United States666 Posts
| ||
|
EnclaveUSA
United States18 Posts
| ||
| ||
