|
On October 07 2011 19:51 Raid wrote:
Looks OP and I play terran lol. I am praying for goliath 2.0 plx plx plz? or something that lays land mines of some sort or claymores plx plz plx?
Maybe it's "tires" are really land mines! Oh shi~
|
On October 07 2011 18:36 MiraMax wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 18:28 grappasc wrote:On October 07 2011 18:01 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 17:58 grappasc wrote:On October 07 2011 17:52 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 17:48 grappasc wrote:just thought I should make it clearer ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/e4ZGQ.jpg) Jeez, let it go already. You've made your point. your comment was unjustified, uncalled for and counterproductive You sound like this discussion is a matter of national security lol. You've already shown your speculation, now let it go. It's not like we won't know what it is 2 weeks from now anyways. again, unjustified, uncalled for, counterproductive. slandering me only shows you for what you are. Please, grappasc, could you just stop trolling this thread. It's not funny or anything, everybody saw your wonderful picture a dozen of times and you can just let it go now. Anybody here knows when the next silhouette will be revealed? Is it some kind of weekly or monthly thing?
Definetely weekly, this is for Blizzcon hype.
|
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted.
|
|
|
On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted.
I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races.
|
On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races.
I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason.
People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran."
The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player).
|
I think it's a Marauder with an anti-air upgrade!
|
On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player).
I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?".
|
On October 07 2011 20:13 LightWireEX wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player). I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?".
I stepped back and realized "I care about StarCraft 2 enough that I post on a forum about it." Why are you here if you don't care?
I'd say there's something wrong with you if you don't question anything.
|
prolly it's like a shield against bane/zeals
|
On October 07 2011 20:10 EzPz wrote:
I think it's a Marauder with an anti-air upgrade!
Marauder with shields AND land mines!
Seriously, relax, not like Blizzard won't release an OP Zerg unit or that'll dominate the field when HoTS is released, that is standard computer game plot since... forever.
"[PC_NAME] we have been selected as test pilots in an experimental project for a prototype fighter/tank/weapon that'll tilt the war in our favour, I want this squadron/regiment/unit to test it to the fullest extent and I want [PC_NAME] to be in charge."
|
On October 07 2011 20:15 Brotocol wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:13 LightWireEX wrote:On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player). I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?". I stepped back and realized "I care about StarCraft 2 enough that I post on a forum about it." Why are you here if you don't care? I'd say there's something wrong with you if you don't question anything.
They do it in the order of the campaigns because they want to.
Would it change anything if they had a different order?
I don't know, I'm not blizzard. Go ask them.
I hope this answer is satisfying because it's the only one that doesn't include assumptions and/or lies.
I think you are really a bit too picky on this one. It creates more hype anyway if the toss unit gets revealed last, because everyone is curious about this.
|
I think it's a transformer hellion that transforms and is able to attack air, even though I think it's a boring concept.
|
On October 07 2011 20:24 KeksX wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:15 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:13 LightWireEX wrote:On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player). I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?". I stepped back and realized "I care about StarCraft 2 enough that I post on a forum about it." Why are you here if you don't care? I'd say there's something wrong with you if you don't question anything. They do it in the order of the campaigns because they want to. Would it change anything if they had a different order? I don't know, I'm not blizzard. Go ask them. I hope this answer is satisfying because it's the only one that doesn't include assumptions and/or lies. I think you are really a bit too picky on this one. It creates more hype anyway if the toss unit gets revealed last, because everyone is curious about this.
"Because they want to." That's convenient.
Face it, there's no reason to do it this way, and coincidentally (?) Terran just happens to be first in everything.
I think the people who got trashed earlier for making this observation had a fair point at the very least.
|
On October 07 2011 20:15 Brotocol wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:13 LightWireEX wrote:On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player). I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?". I stepped back and realized "I care about StarCraft 2 enough that I post on a forum about it." Why are you here if you don't care? I'd say there's something wrong with you if you don't question anything.
I do think that people might be making rather too much fuss over the order of the reveal of silhouettes of upcoming units. It's not like they're only releasing new Terran units.
On October 07 2011 20:27 Brotocol wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:24 KeksX wrote:On October 07 2011 20:15 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:13 LightWireEX wrote:On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player). I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?". I stepped back and realized "I care about StarCraft 2 enough that I post on a forum about it." Why are you here if you don't care? I'd say there's something wrong with you if you don't question anything. They do it in the order of the campaigns because they want to. Would it change anything if they had a different order? I don't know, I'm not blizzard. Go ask them. I hope this answer is satisfying because it's the only one that doesn't include assumptions and/or lies. I think you are really a bit too picky on this one. It creates more hype anyway if the toss unit gets revealed last, because everyone is curious about this. "Because they want to." That's convenient. Face it, there's no reason to do it this way, and coincidentally (?) Terran just happens to be first in everything. I think the people who got trashed earlier for making this observation had a fair point at the very least.
Does it matter if Terran is in the front of the marketing? Greater prominence in promotional material hardly means anything horrific. Again, this is just the order of silhouettes of upcoming units.
|
On October 07 2011 20:21 Hattori_Hanzo wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:10 EzPz wrote:
I think it's a Marauder with an anti-air upgrade! Marauder with shields AND land mines! Seriously, relax, not like Blizzard won't release an OP Zerg unit or that'll dominate the field when HoTS is released, that is standard computer game plot since... forever.
It is about time Zerg get their marine/ghost type unit 
I want to hear Terrans complain about Zerg about 1 and half years before the last expansion. The we can both complain about toss for year and a half. Then finally we may get balance.
|
On October 07 2011 20:27 MrSalamandra wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:15 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:13 LightWireEX wrote:On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player). I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?". I stepped back and realized "I care about StarCraft 2 enough that I post on a forum about it." Why are you here if you don't care? I'd say there's something wrong with you if you don't question anything. I do think that people might be making rather too much fuss over the order of the reveal of silhouettes of upcoming units. It's not like they're only releasing new Terran units.
It just adds up with the rest of all the other cues (verbal and otherwise) displayed by Blizzard.
This, on its own, is insignificant perhaps. But things are adding up - both small (like this) and large things. And the big picture isn't looking so pretty to me right now.
I can see why so many people made this (rather obvious imo) observation.
|
Brotocol I think you need to take your tinfoil hat off, your blizzard favors terran conspiracy doesn't make any sense, and like all conspiracy theories your basing it off something arbitrary like an order of reveal, which actually means nothing...
|
On October 07 2011 20:42 Disquiet wrote:
Brotocol I think you need to take your tinfoil hat off, your blizzard favors terran conspiracy doesn't make any sense, and like all conspiracy theories your basing it off something arbitrary like an order of reveal, which actually means nothing...
Who said anything about a conspiracy? That's a strawman argument if I ever saw one.
I said they were biased.
|
On October 07 2011 20:24 KeksX wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2011 20:15 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:13 LightWireEX wrote:On October 07 2011 20:03 Brotocol wrote:On October 07 2011 20:02 GrungyMunchy wrote:On October 07 2011 19:58 Brotocol wrote:
To address the "reveal in order of the expansions" thing... Is there any reason to do so?
It doesn't counter the claim made by some that Blizz favors Terran. "Naw dude, they're doing it in the order of the games." Why? What's the purpose of that? If anything, this is a Zerg expansion. The order is meaningless.
Let's be honest, this does look Terran favored. Because there's no real reason to go in the order of the expansions. It would be MUCH more intuitive to start with the race being highlighted. I don't think it's on Blizzard's best interest to have a game designed to be an esport that has imbalances between races. I'm not suggesting intentional imbalance. But I do think their vision is clouded for whatever reason. People already call this game Terrancraft, and now that, finally, the Zerg chapter is in the spotlight... "Hey, I know! Let's arbitrarily do it in the order that starts with Terran." The reasons for this I can only speculate. Maybe a focus group revealed that Terran is better for marketing. I don't claim to know. But I definitely see bias (and I'm not even a Zerg player). I think you need to take a step back and realize "why the fuck do i care?". I stepped back and realized "I care about StarCraft 2 enough that I post on a forum about it." Why are you here if you don't care? I'd say there's something wrong with you if you don't question anything. They do it in the order of the campaigns because they want to. Would it change anything if they had a different order? I don't know, I'm not blizzard. Go ask them. I hope this answer is satisfying because it's the only one that doesn't include assumptions and/or lies. I think you are really a bit too picky on this one. It creates more hype anyway if the toss unit gets revealed last, because everyone is curious about this.
Doesn't make sense to release them in campaign order, so what unit will the Protoss have to look forward to after the protoss expansion is out. There won't be one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
53446
1168
210
EPT
