• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:11
CET 22:11
KST 06:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win
Tourneys
$100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server? soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1485 users

Situation Report: Patch 1.4, Blizz's Explanations - Page 18

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 28 Next All
CeriseCherries
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
6170 Posts
September 23 2011 22:10 GMT
#341
-.- I don't care about build time, just give me cliffwalk or something... sick of my ultras unable to step over zerglings
Remember, no matter where you go, there you are.
tuho12345
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
4482 Posts
September 23 2011 22:11 GMT
#342
I love carriers, want to play it and tried a lot in my ladder game vs Zerg. But still so sad that they die so quickly against corruptors And every damn zerg vs that strat always pm me after the game and bm me just b/c I tried a new strat that involve Mothership and carriers... This's sad as hell.
SpiZe
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada3640 Posts
September 23 2011 22:19 GMT
#343
So yeah we have a choice between the unit that shouldn't be in SC2 and one of the emblematic units from BW... let's go with the mothership.

This makes me a very sad panda, although this doesn't add anything we didn't know yet.
Blasterion
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
China10272 Posts
September 23 2011 22:29 GMT
#344
Carriers seem like the only end game unit next to maybe ultralisk that kind of serve no purpose in the current meta game, kind of sad
[TLNY]Mahjong Club Thread
Puph
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada635 Posts
September 23 2011 22:40 GMT
#345
On September 23 2011 10:49 askTeivospy wrote:
choosing to buff mothership over carriers when they were debating it in order to get a unit that you never see into the limelight more is almost as sad as someone pointlessly bragging about calling something that was obviously going to happen given it always happens with patches ._>

Periods, young padawan. Official blizzard opinions? Nonsense!!
Intel Dual Core 4400 @ ~2.00GHz / 2046MB RAM / 256 MB ATI Radeon x1300PRO
Ballistixz
Profile Joined January 2010
United States1269 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-24 00:10:10
September 24 2011 00:09 GMT
#346
On September 24 2011 07:10 CeriseCherries wrote:
-.- I don't care about build time, just give me cliffwalk or something... sick of my ultras unable to step over zerglings



build time decreased to 50 was actually a very good choice in buffing. but its not gonna make ultras that much more useful. the main problem with ultras is that they are a resource hog. they drain minerals/gass in a instant and on top of that they get killed at by insanely cost effecient units like immortals or siege tanks. even ghosts are pretty good against ultras because of snipes.

what ultras really need is a decrease in cost. maybe 200 minerals 200 gas or something.
.gypsy
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
Canada689 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-24 00:14:12
September 24 2011 00:13 GMT
#347
gj nerfing the one unit that made tvt skillful ~~ back to idiotic marine/tank a-moving across the land

the other changes are nice though ;; , i commend blizzard for releasing explanations as well :D.
https://www.twitch.tv/gypsy93
Ninja_Bread
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States113 Posts
September 24 2011 00:16 GMT
#348
On September 24 2011 07:10 CeriseCherries wrote:
-.- I don't care about build time, just give me cliffwalk or something... sick of my ultras unable to step over zerglings


ultralisks have range, retard.

User was temp banned for this post.
Mang
Grobyc
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Canada18410 Posts
September 24 2011 00:20 GMT
#349
My patch update keeps getting stuck at 92% then gives me an error ;_;

Anyone gotten this?
If you watch Godzilla backwards it's about a benevolent lizard who helps rebuild a city and then moonwalks into the ocean.
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-24 01:26:33
September 24 2011 00:58 GMT
#350
On September 24 2011 05:15 Toadvine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 04:21 TUski wrote:
I feel like Blizzard just keeps thinking "O hey, we haven't seen unit x in games enough, let's BUFF THEM so people could use them more!"

I don't think this is a good approach to game balance. It also caters a lot more to casuals than people playing the game at a competitive level.


It's actually a great approach, if BW has taught us anything. Instead of limiting options, so the game plays out according to the designers' preconceived notions, it's better to give the players more tools, so that they can look for a solution themselves. It actually made me rage when their rationale for the Thor nerf was "we don't like seeing Thors being massed"; that's just such a retarded reason to make the game less interesting.

Look at Protoss and Zerg, with their "this is unit X, and you should get it in situation Y" philosophy, and then look at Terran, with "this is unit X, look at how much cool stuff you can do with it!". Which seems better to you? Which do you prefer, PvP, or TvT(let's put Code S aside for the purpose of this comparison)? Clearly, a design that focuses on options, rather than purposes, makes for more interesting gameplay, and a more fun game in general.

So yeah, it's awesome that they're buffing the Immortal and the Warp Prism. Not so awesome they're nerfing the Infestor, why not buff HTs instead?


It comes out as a balance of both.

For example Science Vessels Irradiate was to take out key units.

Then you had Scourge to take out key air units like the Science Vessel.

Then you had generalist units like the Marine to defend the Science Vessel against Scourge.

People then found out you could irradiate your own Science Vessels and use it as an "eraser" to AoE lots of small units like drones.

These are all units with a purpose, but also with a ton of options.

Compare this to let's say the Immortal, where they are designed to counter 1 unit and HARD, the Siege Tank. You can't micro the Immortal against Tanks because of clumped pathing, but then again who cares they absorb all the damage anyways and do 50 damage.

You also have the Mothership, Void Ray, 9 Range Colossus, Chargelots, Pheonix, which are already all good at killing or nullifying Siege Tanks and you have one messed up race.

Terran is better than the other races because of what you said, but then they somehow completely missed the "purpose" part. So now you have creative combinations of units that because they have a lot of options, can almost fill any role. Which is great but, in the certain stages of the game it makes things very difficult or very weird.

For example we use Ghosts to take out Infestors. Ghosts were never designed that way, its just that they had so many options, however Science Vessel Irradiate would make much more sense (or HSM could one shot 1 unit at 9 range for 75 energy). Ghosts don't really fill the role of anti-specialist unit, they just ended up that way, and that's why it doesn't do the job quite that well, and it feels really weird.

Other examples like Reapers and Hellions fill the exact same role, there is nothing like Valkyries or Irradiate to counter mass-mass muta, etc.

Of course this means the other races should also have units that will give them options against these stronger compositions (such as scourge), but then on the strategy part of the game it will be a lot more deep while improving the more dice-roll nature of SC2, and also making the game a lot more dynamic.

Instead its nerf this nerf that, rather than providing the races with better options. Instead of nerfing the infestor, Blizzard could have buffed HSM much more in order to deal with mass infestor.

In summary you need units with a purpose and with options, but it seems SC2 just went for one or the other.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Techno
Profile Joined June 2010
1900 Posts
September 24 2011 02:03 GMT
#351
On September 23 2011 11:13 GinDo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 23 2011 11:10 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
Didn't Blizzard say that they intended the Mothership to be a unit for Bronze players to mess around with? And yet they buffed it instead of the Carrier? Incredible.


Same reason they nerfed the hellion. They want the game to be easy. Thats why they want bio to be viable in TvT, because Mech TvT takes skill.

What the fuck?
I think consistent bio tvt takes skill.

I can mech way better than I can bio. Mech is the smart players option, bio is MMA's option.
Hell, its awesome to LOSE to nukes!
Techno
Profile Joined June 2010
1900 Posts
September 24 2011 02:06 GMT
#352
[QUOTE]On September 24 2011 09:58 sluggaslamoo wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 24 2011 05:15 Toadvine wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 24 2011 04:21 TUski wrote:
Ghosts don't really fill the role of anti-specialist unit, they just ended up that way, and that's why it doesn't do the job quite that well, and it feels really weird.[/QUOTE]
I dont even know what to say. Every ghost ability screams anti specialist.
Hell, its awesome to LOSE to nukes!
Techno
Profile Joined June 2010
1900 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-24 02:07:53
September 24 2011 02:06 GMT
#353
On September 24 2011 04:21 TUski wrote:
Ghosts don't really fill the role of anti-specialist unit, they just ended up that way, and that's why it doesn't do the job quite that well, and it feels really weird.

I dont even know what to say. Every ghost ability screams anti specialist.

EDIT:

Sorry for triple post ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Hell, its awesome to LOSE to nukes!
Toadvine
Profile Joined November 2010
Poland2234 Posts
September 24 2011 02:36 GMT
#354
On September 24 2011 09:58 sluggaslamoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 05:15 Toadvine wrote:
On September 24 2011 04:21 TUski wrote:
I feel like Blizzard just keeps thinking "O hey, we haven't seen unit x in games enough, let's BUFF THEM so people could use them more!"

I don't think this is a good approach to game balance. It also caters a lot more to casuals than people playing the game at a competitive level.


It's actually a great approach, if BW has taught us anything. Instead of limiting options, so the game plays out according to the designers' preconceived notions, it's better to give the players more tools, so that they can look for a solution themselves. It actually made me rage when their rationale for the Thor nerf was "we don't like seeing Thors being massed"; that's just such a retarded reason to make the game less interesting.

Look at Protoss and Zerg, with their "this is unit X, and you should get it in situation Y" philosophy, and then look at Terran, with "this is unit X, look at how much cool stuff you can do with it!". Which seems better to you? Which do you prefer, PvP, or TvT(let's put Code S aside for the purpose of this comparison)? Clearly, a design that focuses on options, rather than purposes, makes for more interesting gameplay, and a more fun game in general.

So yeah, it's awesome that they're buffing the Immortal and the Warp Prism. Not so awesome they're nerfing the Infestor, why not buff HTs instead?


It comes out as a balance of both.

For example Science Vessels Irradiate was to take out key units.

Then you had Scourge to take out key air units like the Science Vessel.

Then you had generalist units like the Marine to defend the Science Vessel against Scourge.

People then found out you could irradiate your own Science Vessels and use it as an "eraser" to AoE lots of small units like drones.

These are all units with a purpose, but also with a ton of options.

Compare this to let's say the Immortal, where they are designed to counter 1 unit and HARD, the Siege Tank. You can't micro the Immortal against Tanks because of clumped pathing, but then again who cares they absorb all the damage anyways and do 50 damage.

You also have the Mothership, Void Ray, 9 Range Colossus, Chargelots, Pheonix, which are already all good at killing or nullifying Siege Tanks and you have one messed up race.

Terran is better than the other races because of what you said, but then they somehow completely missed the "purpose" part. So now you have creative combinations of units that because they have a lot of options, can almost fill any role. Which is great but, in the certain stages of the game it makes things very difficult or very weird.

For example we use Ghosts to take out Infestors. Ghosts were never designed that way, its just that they had so many options, however Science Vessel Irradiate would make much more sense (or HSM could one shot 1 unit at 9 range for 75 energy). Ghosts don't really fill the role of anti-specialist unit, they just ended up that way, and that's why it doesn't do the job quite that well, and it feels really weird.

Other examples like Reapers and Hellions fill the exact same role, there is nothing like Valkyries or Irradiate to counter mass-mass muta, etc.

Of course this means the other races should also have units that will give them options against these stronger compositions (such as scourge), but then on the strategy part of the game it will be a lot more deep while improving the more dice-roll nature of SC2, and also making the game a lot more dynamic.

Instead its nerf this nerf that, rather than providing the races with better options. Instead of nerfing the infestor, Blizzard could have buffed HSM much more in order to deal with mass infestor.

In summary you need units with a purpose and with options, but it seems SC2 just went for one or the other.


I agree with most of that, with a few caveats. For example, I don't think they made the Immortal to counter Tanks specifically, but as a general purpose tanking unit - kind of like the Ultra was in BW, expensive and beefy, with decent damage and huge survivability. One can argue that Protoss doesn't need such a unit, since Zealots fill the purpose quite well, but the idea isn't bad altogether. They just ended up making it too specialized, and therefore not useful in most practical situations. That's why they're trying to embrace the "huge damage to armored" part, because the tank part ended up failing.

Reapers were just something they put in the game because they wanted to show off cliff-walking, and because it was the Terran expansion, they ended up being a Terran unit. But they never fit in with the race especially well, and overlap a lot with other units. Would have made way more sense as a Protoss unit imo.

The mass Muta part, is, I think, intentional for some strange reason, because AtA splash damage was removed from the game altogether.


On September 24 2011 11:06 Techno wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 04:21 TUski wrote:
Ghosts don't really fill the role of anti-specialist unit, they just ended up that way, and that's why it doesn't do the job quite that well, and it feels really weird.

I dont even know what to say. Every ghost ability screams anti specialist.

EDIT:

Sorry for triple post ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


Well, the Terran challenge uses a Ghost to kill an Ultralisk with Snipe, so you never know...
"There are always some Eskimos ready to instruct the Congolese on how to cope with heat waves." - S.J.Lec
Nymbul
Profile Joined July 2011
United Kingdom127 Posts
September 24 2011 02:49 GMT
#355
On September 24 2011 09:09 Ballistixz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 07:10 CeriseCherries wrote:
-.- I don't care about build time, just give me cliffwalk or something... sick of my ultras unable to step over zerglings



build time decreased to 50 was actually a very good choice in buffing. but its not gonna make ultras that much more useful. the main problem with ultras is that they are a resource hog. they drain minerals/gass in a instant and on top of that they get killed at by insanely cost effecient units like immortals or siege tanks. even ghosts are pretty good against ultras because of snipes.

what ultras really need is a decrease in cost. maybe 200 minerals 200 gas or something.


It's hard to say, Ultras are a lategame transition where generally a toss army will consist of mostly Colossi instead of immortals.

Colossus are very fragile to ultralisks so is it really fair to make them cheaper?
BrosephBrostar
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States445 Posts
September 24 2011 02:53 GMT
#356
On September 24 2011 11:36 Toadvine wrote:
I don't think they made the Immortal to counter Tanks specifically, but as a general purpose tanking unit

What is the immortal actually good at taking hits from though? Look at how hardened shields affects different attacks:

Tank: 50>10 (40 less)
Thor: 60>20 (40 less)
Marauder: 20>10 (10 less)
Stalker: 14>10 (4 less)
Immortal: 50>10 (40 less)
Colossus: 30>20 (10 less)
Roach: 16>10 (6 less)
Ultralisk: 35>10 (25 less)

I definitely don't see it as a coincidence that the only things hardened shields have a significant effect on are terran mech units.
CellTech
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada396 Posts
September 24 2011 02:57 GMT
#357
So carrier buff was ACTUALLY an option, but they gave the mothership faster acceleration?

Is that even a buff? It reaches it top speed (slow as hell) slightly faster?

I dont want to live on this planet anymore
^ Probably a Troll Post
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-24 03:00:29
September 24 2011 02:58 GMT
#358
On September 24 2011 04:14 Ownos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 04:00 skatbone wrote:
On September 24 2011 02:22 windsupernova wrote:
On September 24 2011 02:11 trucejl wrote:
On September 24 2011 02:06 Kon-Tiki wrote:
On September 23 2011 12:17 MilesTeg wrote:
Every change makes sense, and once again Blizzard is doing a good job with their patches.

Even without looking the comments I'm sure there are people saying "Blizzard is clueless!" or "David Kim is trolling us!" because they always do, but I think the silent majority agrees with what they're doing.

I love the overseer change, and that they're looking to possibly buff ultras further in the future (you might want to underline that part too, btw, I think it's important).


The silent majority is actually saying "Yeah, this patch is pretty good, but why in God's name did they change Neural Parasite and the Mothership, and not the carrier?"


because as long as viking has 9 range n flies, carriers will continue to fail at its current build time and cost. they probably decided it was easier to buff mothership into something potentially useful super late game as oppose to be useless buff on the carrier just for the hell of it


Actually carriers trade very cost efficiently with Vikings, but yeah buff or no buff on the current metagame Carriers will still be useless. Although I think they could use a build time decrease though I don´t know if 2 base carrier like Mana did in some games against Zerg would break the MU XD


Yea, well, I think we have to take build time into account when we conceptualize trading efficiently.

Waiting on carriers to build makes toss vulnerable (if you've got two carriers cued up in two stargazes, thats 12 supply that isn't in your main army for two minutes.

tl'dr Building carriers ties up a lot of supply for a long period of time, making toss vulnerable, not only until they pop, but also until they've had time to build up their interceptors.


Well in BW they took 140s to complete and no chrono boost too. So I don't think it's entirely that they take too long.

I think people are overestimating the influence of vikings. Colossus also get countered by vikings. But we still make colossus. Because colossus are good.

In BW they took long to make. Difference being that, in a vacuum, they are good. And even considering the environment they were in, they still are good.

Terran went mech in BW and had to slowly creep across the map with tanks and spider mines with their entire army together, or else the more mobile Protoss army would stomp all over them. There are no spidermines in SC2 and terran armies are the extremely mobile ones, while protoss armies stay together. Terran can punish a lot more easily in SC2 than BW. On top of that, carriers were more mobile in BW, being able to kite while still attacking, and could cliff goliaths.

And like I said, colossus have more killing power against terran bio armies and are a cheaper and faster investment. Without a complete revamp, you're just not going to make carriers more viable than the alternatives, unless you break them.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
0neder
Profile Joined July 2009
United States3733 Posts
September 24 2011 02:59 GMT
#359
On September 24 2011 09:09 Ballistixz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 07:10 CeriseCherries wrote:
-.- I don't care about build time, just give me cliffwalk or something... sick of my ultras unable to step over zerglings



build time decreased to 50 was actually a very good choice in buffing. but its not gonna make ultras that much more useful. the main problem with ultras is that they are a resource hog. they drain minerals/gass in a instant and on top of that they get killed at by insanely cost effecient units like immortals or siege tanks. even ghosts are pretty good against ultras because of snipes.

what ultras really need is a decrease in cost. maybe 200 minerals 200 gas or something.

Yes, they need to shrink a bit and cost less given their current strength.
socommaster123
Profile Joined May 2010
United States578 Posts
September 24 2011 03:20 GMT
#360
RE work the carrier for gods sake noone thinks the mothership is cool
Idra White Ra Sheth DRG SaSe Thorzain GOGO!
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 28 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 49m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
White-Ra 283
IndyStarCraft 220
JuggernautJason109
UpATreeSC 73
RushiSC 72
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 194
Dewaltoss 138
Hyun 113
910 23
Yoon 13
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1452
fl0m1129
byalli906
allub306
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu394
Other Games
Grubby4199
FrodaN1571
Beastyqt1039
B2W.Neo409
Fuzer 188
RotterdaM183
C9.Mang0165
mouzStarbuck162
ToD105
XaKoH 88
Trikslyr57
Mew2King45
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV78
StarCraft 2
angryscii 31
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 17
• Adnapsc2 10
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 10
• XenOsky 4
• Michael_bg 4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2120
Other Games
• imaqtpie1524
• Shiphtur901
• WagamamaTV238
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
14h 49m
Gerald vs YoungYakov
Spirit vs MaNa
SHIN vs Percival
Creator vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
1d 11h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 14h
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-22
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.