EPTDo you macro like a pro? - Page 47
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Slikk
Norway81 Posts
| ||
|
CNSnow
Greece67 Posts
But I wanna ask you, how did you find all those information? I know that at the score screen you can see how many workeers you created, but how can I see how many workers did I had at 10, at 15 or at 25 mins. From the build order you can find only till 8-12. I know that I can find out this from my replay but how can I find it from the score screen. Andhow did u found out that and made those graps. Thank you for this post! | ||
|
Angra
United States2652 Posts
I think I would have rather seen 50 from each league with 6 games played a piece rather than 100 with 3, or something like that. Seems like it would be a little bit more of an average then. | ||
|
zinic
Netherlands28 Posts
i liked it even though the calculations etc. i dont realy understand since well ye i didnt study that... the end rusults and graphs are easy to follow... its fun to see the great amounts of differences throughout all leagues :D | ||
|
Daedaluz
Germany19 Posts
On the 2 games I just played I got a spending quotient of 94,2595920801 and 86,8441484526, which seems absurdly high for a lowly diamond scrub. My average unspent ressources were 725 and 1374 respectively, while my average income was 1768 and 2080 respectively. Could someone plop that into the formula and check if my calculation was correct? | ||
|
Brutus
Netherlands284 Posts
On October 01 2011 23:01 Daedaluz wrote: I'm not sure I'm calculating this right... On the 2 games I just played I got a spending quotient of 94,2595920801 and 86,8441484526, which seems absurdly high for a lowly diamond scrub. My average unspent ressources were 725 and 1374 respectively, while my average income was 1768 and 2080 respectively. Could someone plop that into the formula and check if my calculation was correct? It is also important to remember that there is a lot of game-to-game variability in SQ; a Diamond player could feasibly outscore a Grandmaster player in a single game, but they would be highly unlikely to do so when averaged across many games. | ||
|
Daedaluz
Germany19 Posts
On October 01 2011 23:55 Brutus wrote: It is also important to remember that there is a lot of game-to-game variability in SQ; a Diamond player could feasibly outscore a Grandmaster player in a single game, but they would be highly unlikely to do so when averaged across many games. Ohhh I didn't see that. I wasn't implying I macro as well as a GM player ... I just thought that what I calculated was extremely improbable, so I just want someone to check if my math is correct. | ||
|
LetoAtreides82
United States1188 Posts
On October 02 2011 00:40 Daedaluz wrote: Ohhh I didn't see that. I wasn't implying I macro as well as a GM player ... I just thought that what I calculated was extremely improbable, so I just want someone to check if my math is correct. Your calculations are correct. | ||
|
LetoAtreides82
United States1188 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
I'm platinum... Edit: didn't see above posts. | ||
|
CactusSC2
United States61 Posts
| ||
|
springtree
74 Posts
| ||
|
SoulWager
United States464 Posts
| ||
|
Brainiak
Germany91 Posts
On October 02 2011 00:40 Daedaluz wrote: Ohhh I didn't see that. I wasn't implying I macro as well as a GM player ... I just thought that what I calculated was extremely improbable, so I just want someone to check if my math is correct. The problem with the math is, that blizzard only accounts for the money on the bank (top right). but you can also have units in the production line (goody style). This money doesnt do anything, but in the end you will have a great result, because you "spent" that money | ||
|
JerKy
Korea (South)3013 Posts
| ||
|
2l84that
Turkey35 Posts
| ||
|
ChineseWife
United States373 Posts
| ||
|
ePAttack
United States112 Posts
Thanks for taking the time to write this! | ||
|
Th0R
Canada359 Posts
| ||
|
Wizard4k
Germany4 Posts
I have played around with the Excel file a little, adding in a simple yet in my believe appealing "graphical" display of the SQ. I won't waste your time trying to explain it, just take a look at it: http://www.filesonic.com/file/2342166194/Spending_Quotient_SC2_Lower_Leagues.xlsx http://www.filesonic.com/file/2342166204/Spending_Quotient_SC2.xlsx I made 2 versions since sadly, the Excel scaling only allows 5 different leagues to be displayed properly. Naturally, you can adjust the scale to your own wishes by just selecting the cells and choosing "Conditional Formatting -> Manage Rules". Let me know what you think about it! | ||
| ||
