|
I find it absolutely ridiculous that the NASL didn't pay for air fare. Nothing by the NASL concerning this makes sense and they are in the wrong imho.
That being said, players complaining about waking up at 4 AM can chose not to play in the NASL. Their choice.
I do feel the low amount of support that the NASL gives to the players is going to bite them back hard. They will not win the PR war, that's for sure.
|
United States5162 Posts
On August 14 2011 02:51 Iberville wrote: I find it absolutely ridiculous that the NASL didn't pay for air fare. Nothing by the NASL concerning this makes sense and they are in the wrong imho.
That being said, players complaining about waking up at 4 AM can chose not to play in the NASL. Their choice.
I do feel the low amount of support that the NASL gives to the players is going to bite them back hard. They will not win the PR war, that's for sure.
Did you read? The Koreans were going to get $2000 upfront for expenses. Actual costs provided by NASL from season 1 show that this was enough. The Koreans were going to have their airfare, ground travel, and hotel costs payed for.
|
On August 14 2011 02:51 Iberville wrote: I find it absolutely ridiculous that the NASL didn't pay for air fare. Nothing by the NASL concerning this makes sense and they are in the wrong imho.
That being said, players complaining about waking up at 4 AM can chose not to play in the NASL. Their choice.
I do feel the low amount of support that the NASL gives to the players is going to bite them back hard. They will not win the PR war, that's for sure.
Try to read the OP a little bit more.
Then compare it to events like dreamhack and such where much less support is garnered anyway.
|
On August 14 2011 01:53 last.resistance wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 01:48 turdburgler wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On August 13 2011 23:22 FunnelC4kes wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 23:02 Longshank wrote:On August 13 2011 22:49 FunnelC4kes wrote: I really can't help but think that there is two big hurdles:
1. $500 deposit: There is no other league that asks for a deposit. Saying it is for accountability is a bit of a blow to the pride of the teams. You're effectively saying you don't trust them. Whether you mean it like that is beside the question. Sure, you pay a deposit when you rent a property (car, room, house), but an appointment is not the same. You could say "hey, if you miss your games, we'll apply a penalty of $XX to any possible winnings." Problem solved. $500 is a lot of money, as well, especially if what they say about lack of sponsorship is true. That's quite a burden.
Well to be frank, season 1 proved that progamers can't be trusted. Painuser didn't care for showing up for his games and White-Ra forgetting/decided to go partying instead, just to name a few. If you can't trust Sir MannerToss then who can you trust? That is a good point, however your claim that "progamers can't be trusted" is flawed, because the rigidity of the format plays a large role. According to PainUser's statements, the inflexibility of NASL's format meant he would have had to take a four-hour work break or be on call to take probably an hour break. That doesn't work. If White-Ra was able to compromise a time to play his game, he would not have had a schedule conflict. I don't recall seeing an official statement from White-Ra explaining his missed game, so I can neither verify nor disclaim that statement. Either way, walk-over with a prize deduction/penalty points would have been a suitable punishment. There were other games that were missed, including a few of Fenix' and Nani's games, due to schedule conflicts with other major tournaments. This, too, would be avoided with a less rigid format. NASL should be concerned with walk-overs, it loses production value for their casts. However a $500 deposit is overly punitive. the whole problem appears to stem from their need to cast live. i dont think anyone with their head on straight minds replays and using the same logic of its ok to cast live then stream the recording, its completely ok to cast from the replays too. nasl dug their own ditch on the schedule problems but thats not really relevent. everyone knew what they were getting into when they signed up, it wasnt a secret. Casting from replays opens up to the casters getting out of synch, like we saw with the EG Master's Cup this week with Painuser getting out of synch with DJ Wheat and ultimately having to switch computers to continue the cast.
they are sitting in the same room and able to see each others screens
R1CH even developed a program to sync replays that was used in the TSL
|
As many people have stated before me, 1000 $ was the amount given, they added the extra 1k $ from the koreans own winnings as an offer to pay, meaning you would still pay half from your own pocket if you loose in the first round.
Then add the 500 $ dollar per player they have to pay beforehand when they are in an economic struggle it hardly feels worth it.
|
On August 14 2011 02:57 turdburgler wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 01:53 last.resistance wrote:On August 14 2011 01:48 turdburgler wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On August 13 2011 23:22 FunnelC4kes wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 23:02 Longshank wrote:On August 13 2011 22:49 FunnelC4kes wrote: I really can't help but think that there is two big hurdles:
1. $500 deposit: There is no other league that asks for a deposit. Saying it is for accountability is a bit of a blow to the pride of the teams. You're effectively saying you don't trust them. Whether you mean it like that is beside the question. Sure, you pay a deposit when you rent a property (car, room, house), but an appointment is not the same. You could say "hey, if you miss your games, we'll apply a penalty of $XX to any possible winnings." Problem solved. $500 is a lot of money, as well, especially if what they say about lack of sponsorship is true. That's quite a burden.
Well to be frank, season 1 proved that progamers can't be trusted. Painuser didn't care for showing up for his games and White-Ra forgetting/decided to go partying instead, just to name a few. If you can't trust Sir MannerToss then who can you trust? That is a good point, however your claim that "progamers can't be trusted" is flawed, because the rigidity of the format plays a large role. According to PainUser's statements, the inflexibility of NASL's format meant he would have had to take a four-hour work break or be on call to take probably an hour break. That doesn't work. If White-Ra was able to compromise a time to play his game, he would not have had a schedule conflict. I don't recall seeing an official statement from White-Ra explaining his missed game, so I can neither verify nor disclaim that statement. Either way, walk-over with a prize deduction/penalty points would have been a suitable punishment. There were other games that were missed, including a few of Fenix' and Nani's games, due to schedule conflicts with other major tournaments. This, too, would be avoided with a less rigid format. NASL should be concerned with walk-overs, it loses production value for their casts. However a $500 deposit is overly punitive. the whole problem appears to stem from their need to cast live. i dont think anyone with their head on straight minds replays and using the same logic of its ok to cast live then stream the recording, its completely ok to cast from the replays too. nasl dug their own ditch on the schedule problems but thats not really relevent. everyone knew what they were getting into when they signed up, it wasnt a secret. Casting from replays opens up to the casters getting out of synch, like we saw with the EG Master's Cup this week with Painuser getting out of synch with DJ Wheat and ultimately having to switch computers to continue the cast. they are sitting in the same room and able to see each others screens R1CH even developed a program to sync replays that was used in the TSL
The sync program is good, but not perfect. And 2 people obsing on one computer isn't that good as you are going to miss even more attacks.
|
I don't understand why they just didn't take 16,000$ out of the overall prize pool and give every player an extra $1000 towards travel expenses in addition to what they're already doing. Wouldn't an extra 1k be enough? Maybe the winning player makes $40,000 instead of $50,000, and so on, but that's better than the tournament being essentially neutered.
|
United States5162 Posts
On August 14 2011 04:30 Vul wrote: I don't understand why they just didn't take 16,000$ out of the overall prize pool and give every player an extra $1000 towards travel expenses in addition to what they're already doing. Wouldn't an extra 1k be enough? Maybe the winning player makes $40,000 instead of $50,000, and so on, but that's better than the tournament being essentially neutered.
And reducing the prize pool is fair to all the non-koreans? You can't say you have xx prize pool, and then after everyone agrees, change it because one party decided it didn't like the rules after the fact.
|
On August 14 2011 03:39 jmbthirteen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 02:57 turdburgler wrote:On August 14 2011 01:53 last.resistance wrote:On August 14 2011 01:48 turdburgler wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On August 13 2011 23:22 FunnelC4kes wrote:Show nested quote +On August 13 2011 23:02 Longshank wrote:On August 13 2011 22:49 FunnelC4kes wrote: I really can't help but think that there is two big hurdles:
1. $500 deposit: There is no other league that asks for a deposit. Saying it is for accountability is a bit of a blow to the pride of the teams. You're effectively saying you don't trust them. Whether you mean it like that is beside the question. Sure, you pay a deposit when you rent a property (car, room, house), but an appointment is not the same. You could say "hey, if you miss your games, we'll apply a penalty of $XX to any possible winnings." Problem solved. $500 is a lot of money, as well, especially if what they say about lack of sponsorship is true. That's quite a burden.
Well to be frank, season 1 proved that progamers can't be trusted. Painuser didn't care for showing up for his games and White-Ra forgetting/decided to go partying instead, just to name a few. If you can't trust Sir MannerToss then who can you trust? That is a good point, however your claim that "progamers can't be trusted" is flawed, because the rigidity of the format plays a large role. According to PainUser's statements, the inflexibility of NASL's format meant he would have had to take a four-hour work break or be on call to take probably an hour break. That doesn't work. If White-Ra was able to compromise a time to play his game, he would not have had a schedule conflict. I don't recall seeing an official statement from White-Ra explaining his missed game, so I can neither verify nor disclaim that statement. Either way, walk-over with a prize deduction/penalty points would have been a suitable punishment. There were other games that were missed, including a few of Fenix' and Nani's games, due to schedule conflicts with other major tournaments. This, too, would be avoided with a less rigid format. NASL should be concerned with walk-overs, it loses production value for their casts. However a $500 deposit is overly punitive. the whole problem appears to stem from their need to cast live. i dont think anyone with their head on straight minds replays and using the same logic of its ok to cast live then stream the recording, its completely ok to cast from the replays too. nasl dug their own ditch on the schedule problems but thats not really relevent. everyone knew what they were getting into when they signed up, it wasnt a secret. Casting from replays opens up to the casters getting out of synch, like we saw with the EG Master's Cup this week with Painuser getting out of synch with DJ Wheat and ultimately having to switch computers to continue the cast. they are sitting in the same room and able to see each others screens R1CH even developed a program to sync replays that was used in the TSL The sync program is good, but not perfect. And 2 people obsing on one computer isn't that good as you are going to miss even more attacks.
this is getting so off topic but ill continue to reply i guess ; / they wouldnt need 1 pc, they could just catch up the computer that isnt recording the vod using pause or x2 often.
they wouldnt be streaming it live either so they would have time to edit and redo it if mistakes are made.
|
Regardless of who's to blame for the situation, I'm not sure this is a good business decision on the part of NASL.
SC2Con clearly thinks that they have leverage over NASL here, and to be honest I think they're right. Without Koreans NASL will lose viewers and subscribers; a significant amount if I'm not mistaken. Even if they are morally correct, I wonder if the loss in revenue would be enough to offset what it would've cost them to agree to the Koreans' demands in the first place.
|
A question for Xeris; Are you posting a reply in Korean for the Korean community? It seems to me that this TIG article is so full of errors(if what you say about deposits is correct) that a reply is warrented. It could also be worth mentioning the signing of contracts and whatnot.
|
On August 14 2011 04:36 Dracid wrote: Regardless of who's to blame for the situation, I'm not sure this is a good business decision on the part of NASL.
SC2Con clearly thinks that they have leverage over NASL here, and to be honest I think they're right. Without Koreans NASL will lose viewers and subscribers; a significant amount if I'm not mistaken. Even if they are morally correct, I wonder if the loss in revenue would be enough to offset what it would've cost them to agree to the Koreans' demands in the first place.
But don't you think that by giving into SC2Con's demands, it PROVES to them that they have leverage over NASL? So what makes you think their demands will stay the same? What makes you think that tomorrow they won't be demanding business class tickets and 5 start hotels?
I'm not saying they would, but what I am saying is that they could, and are encouraged to if NASL doesn't make a stand.
Also, can NASL afford their demands even if they wanted to? If IPL is losing money and MLG is barely making it, what makes people think NASL is rolling in dough?
|
On August 14 2011 04:30 Vul wrote: I don't understand why they just didn't take 16,000$ out of the overall prize pool and give every player an extra $1000 towards travel expenses in addition to what they're already doing. Wouldn't an extra 1k be enough? Maybe the winning player makes $40,000 instead of $50,000, and so on, but that's better than the tournament being essentially neutered.
Well, because, there's 30 other players in the league who have signed contracts saying that there will be a 100,000 prize pool. For NASL to do that would mean breaching 30 of their own contracts. I think it's neither fair nor professional to do that.
|
i really thought NASL was handling things badly during season 1, but they have my full support in this question. the way the korean teams have acted are not professional at all
|
On August 14 2011 02:17 Longshank wrote:
So why NASL and not Dreamhack?
That's the million dollar question. That's why I'm still on these forums, waiting for some answer from SC2Con...all I want to know is why and what their logic is, because at the moment, it doesn't seem to make sense.
All I see right now is either a committee who is looking out after their players but is thinking short-term, or a committee who saw a chance to hard-ball and failed.
I hope neither of those is true, because if it is, then my respect for Korean management plummets and I will support every major Korean player to sign with foreign teams asap.
|
On August 14 2011 02:56 Medrea wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 02:51 Iberville wrote: I find it absolutely ridiculous that the NASL didn't pay for air fare. Nothing by the NASL concerning this makes sense and they are in the wrong imho.
That being said, players complaining about waking up at 4 AM can chose not to play in the NASL. Their choice.
I do feel the low amount of support that the NASL gives to the players is going to bite them back hard. They will not win the PR war, that's for sure. Try to read the OP a little bit more. Then compare it to events like dreamhack and such where much less support is garnered anyway.
They don't have the possibility of sending 16 Koreans to Dreamhack etc. When it's a real possibility that a large number of your players could have to go to the US, you want that cost covered. NASL offered a 60 day lag of $2000. Let me know when you find an airline and hotel that will take their payment up to 60 days after the service.
|
On August 14 2011 04:33 Myles wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 04:30 Vul wrote: I don't understand why they just didn't take 16,000$ out of the overall prize pool and give every player an extra $1000 towards travel expenses in addition to what they're already doing. Wouldn't an extra 1k be enough? Maybe the winning player makes $40,000 instead of $50,000, and so on, but that's better than the tournament being essentially neutered. And reducing the prize pool is fair to all the non-koreans? You can't say you have xx prize pool, and then after everyone agrees, change it because one party decided it didn't like the rules after the fact.
Who decides what's fair? Is it fair that people bought passes to watch this league, thinking that Koreans from Korean teams would be there, but they won't be? Is it fair that it will cost S. Koreans more to come to this tournament than it would a US player, despite the fact that almost all of the good play is in Korea?
A lot of things are unfair, that's how the world is.
And it's not one party, I just checked and it looks like it's about 16 parties, which is a good amount of the league. Those 16 parties bring quite a lot of viewers to this tournament. So I guess you can do what seems fair, whatever you think that means, or you can put on a great tournament.
|
On August 14 2011 05:11 whateverpeeps wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 04:30 Vul wrote: I don't understand why they just didn't take 16,000$ out of the overall prize pool and give every player an extra $1000 towards travel expenses in addition to what they're already doing. Wouldn't an extra 1k be enough? Maybe the winning player makes $40,000 instead of $50,000, and so on, but that's better than the tournament being essentially neutered. Well, because, there's 30 other players in the league who have signed contracts saying that there will be a 100,000 prize pool. For NASL to do that would mean breaching 30 of their own contracts. I think it's neither fair nor professional to do that.
Okay, well if they state the exact amount of the prize pool in the contracts then I'm sure they could renegotiate. And I never said that they should only give travel money to the Koreans, what they could do is give it to everyone in the RO16, like a prize, but make the overall prize pool somewhat smaller.
It honestly seems really simple: Increase the prize for making it to the RO16, so that everyone can afford to come, but reduce some of the later prizes in order to afford it. I don't know why they don't do that anyway, since its such a global event.
|
On August 14 2011 05:18 aksfjh wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 02:56 Medrea wrote:On August 14 2011 02:51 Iberville wrote: I find it absolutely ridiculous that the NASL didn't pay for air fare. Nothing by the NASL concerning this makes sense and they are in the wrong imho.
That being said, players complaining about waking up at 4 AM can chose not to play in the NASL. Their choice.
I do feel the low amount of support that the NASL gives to the players is going to bite them back hard. They will not win the PR war, that's for sure. Try to read the OP a little bit more. Then compare it to events like dreamhack and such where much less support is garnered anyway. They don't have the possibility of sending 16 Koreans to Dreamhack etc. When it's a real possibility that a large number of your players could have to go to the US, you want that cost covered. NASL offered a 60 day lag of $2000. Let me know when you find an airline and hotel that will take their payment up to 60 days after the service.
I think that's just the cost of admission at that point though.
|
On August 14 2011 05:18 aksfjh wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 02:56 Medrea wrote:On August 14 2011 02:51 Iberville wrote: I find it absolutely ridiculous that the NASL didn't pay for air fare. Nothing by the NASL concerning this makes sense and they are in the wrong imho.
That being said, players complaining about waking up at 4 AM can chose not to play in the NASL. Their choice.
I do feel the low amount of support that the NASL gives to the players is going to bite them back hard. They will not win the PR war, that's for sure. Try to read the OP a little bit more. Then compare it to events like dreamhack and such where much less support is garnered anyway. NASL offered a 60 day lag of $2000. Let me know when you find an airline and hotel that will take their payment up to 60 days after the service.
Where did you get this information from? It's 60 day lag for refunding season 1 security deposits and giving prize money (which is really short).
I didn't read anything about 60 day lag for the travel expenses.
|
|
|
|