On July 28 2011 12:48 KimJongChill wrote:
I agree. Also, people need to use a consistent standard for measuring these gaps. Just saying that diamond->master is the hardest says nothing about the sheer range of skill in diamond. The lowest diamonds are worse than top gold, while the best diamond can even be better than mid master.
I thought about this as I wrote my post. You could probably say there's a gray area between the highest/lowest of any two consecutive leagues so it's a difficult question.I agree. Also, people need to use a consistent standard for measuring these gaps. Just saying that diamond->master is the hardest says nothing about the sheer range of skill in diamond. The lowest diamonds are worse than top gold, while the best diamond can even be better than mid master.
For my answer, I just know I couldn't come close to beating a GM/very high masters player as a relatively new masters player; I don't know if there's really that huge of a skill gap within diamond or any other particular league.