EPTTrendsetters for each race! - Page 9
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
gillon
Sweden1578 Posts
| ||
|
BlitzerSC
Italy8800 Posts
| ||
|
Elem
Sweden4717 Posts
| ||
|
BlizzrdSlave
161 Posts
On July 10 2011 09:13 SafeAsCheese wrote: zerg doesn't have any pioneers  thats because zerg is a race that lacks diverse deadly builds apart from cheese.I learned the early infestor burrowed mineral line on my own. thats a cheese. its totally ineffective and will kill you if you're blind countered or scouted. Most of zerg's special plays are cheeses. The reason is that there's no self sufficient builds for zerg. its always about trying to keep up with T and P who play follow the leader. Zerg cant lead. its not economically viable for them to do so. If zerg could, they would get even more QQ's than ever out of T or P because they can force terran and protoss responses that they can then quickly TS and punish. | ||
|
BlizzrdSlave
161 Posts
On July 10 2011 09:13 SafeAsCheese wrote: zerg doesn't have any pioneers thats because zerg is a race that lacks diverse deadly builds apart from cheese.I learned the early infestor burrowed mineral line on my own. thats a cheese. its totally ineffective and will kill you if you're blind countered or scouted. Most of zerg's special plays are cheeses. The reason is that there's no self sufficient builds for zerg. its always about trying to keep up with T and P who play follow the leader. Zerg cant lead. its not economically viable for them to do so. If zerg could, they would get even more QQ's than ever out of T or P because they can force terran and protoss responses that they can then quickly TS and punish. On a side note, I really think that as people learn to use units and tech in ways not originally planned or desired by the game makers, the game SHOULD go through rebalancing on those basis. | ||
|
fuzzy_panda
New Zealand1681 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12248 Posts
1) Tyler for 1base blink stalkers (or Nazgul, not 100% sure on this), and 5-6 gating in pvz, and most importantly double forge in pvt. Nowadays it's such a standard build, and back in march/april he was the only one doing it (see his showmatch vs Jinro). Plus of course his phoenix play. 2) White-ra for warp prisms, even though it's not particularly popular yet, and especially colossus/void ray. | ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
Morrow : 3/5 rax reapers, koreans: 3 hatch muta vs protoss, the topic is speaks about trendsetters not inventors thats the difference  | ||
|
OdiousTea
Australia357 Posts
| ||
|
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On July 10 2011 17:12 Eknoid4 wrote: DRG popularized low tech ZvT? low tech ZvT has existed forever. The problem with this thread is that no one is checking their sources and just about everyone is completely wrong about when something first started it and when it first became common. It's not about existing forever. It's about people being shown about the fact that it can win more than platinum ladder games. So, it is actually "popularized" by DongRaeGu. On July 10 2011 19:52 bgx wrote: Idra : Fast expand (or 14 pool 15 hatch) Dimaga: Baneling bust Sen: 1 base Muta build i think Morrow : 3/5 rax reapers, koreans: 3 hatch muta vs protoss, the topic is speaks about trendsetters not inventors thats the difference I'm pretty sure that trendsetting of fast expand goes to Fruitdealer, who won a GSL with it. | ||
|
Phyxx
Denmark681 Posts
On July 10 2011 17:57 koolaid1990 wrote: Terran: BitByBit for scv marine all ins which is still popular today Actually, the scv marine all ins was popularized by MKP before BitByBit got his 15 minutes of frame. The phrase came up because he just did it every single game at a completely random timing. | ||
|
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
On July 10 2011 14:10 Blasphemi wrote: Yes no Koreans have ever invented anything. What? Do Koreans even play Starcraft? | ||
|
Marsupian
Netherlands455 Posts
| ||
|
Mazaire
Australia217 Posts
| ||
|
Marsupian
Netherlands455 Posts
On July 10 2011 23:40 Mazaire wrote: OP i am really surprised that spanishwa is not in the list for zerg. i mean the ice fisher build is so strong if implemented right, you are so overwhelmingly strong in the meta game and players all the way down into the silver league (that i have seen/played against) are taking their two cents on the build. even though is a one off thing i believe that so many people have adopted the build that i would be worthy of a mention just because it weasled its way into the (at least my) list of standard builds for zerg. The thing is that it doesn't get used much in tournaments and really high level play. It is a valid built but it's just not used at the top level as far as I'm aware. It works great at the lower levels because it's really solid defensively while being good economical but at the high level it's not used (if I'm wrong feel free to correct me). | ||
|
userstupidname
Sweden272 Posts
Other are morrow with his ling style | ||
|
Juke290
Egypt316 Posts
On July 10 2011 08:45 NEXPanDa wrote: Good list so far, but I would put KiWiKaKi at 3, WhiteRa at 4, and YongHwa at 5. Naniwa is really mechanically good and farily standard, he is still probably top 10 though. User was banned for this post. Why was he banned for this post? | ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
He was banned for multiple accounts according to the automated ban list | ||
|
Juke290
Egypt316 Posts
On July 10 2011 23:58 Shellshock1122 wrote: He was banned for multiple accounts according to the automated ban list Ah ok, my mistake for not checking the list. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
| ||
| ||
