• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:52
CEST 12:52
KST 19:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32259 users

Model for imbalance, with myths - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
worldsnap
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada222 Posts
May 20 2011 06:27 GMT
#41
On May 20 2011 15:00 avilo wrote:
Just because someone made an incredibly long post does not make it mega awesome or even remotely accurate.

The most obvious thing completely wrong with the "post" is to not look at pros for balance. In any RTS game or game you always look at the top level for balance because these are the people playing the game at the highest level and are actively trying to "break the game."

Really all the OP is saying (but ironically not doing in many of his examples in the OP) is: "don't be biased with your balance judgements."

Nothing new...and there's no need to go into "intricate mathematics" or math at all for any of this...the OP is overcomplicating things, and likely has not enough experience to legitimately comment on balance or imbalance in the first place.

The most qualified people to talk about balance are the pro players and people high up on ladder that are playing the game everyday versus other good players.

But 99% of these players are trying to practice and improve themselves and not even worry about balance in the first place, though everyone QQ sometimes.

imo OP is just trying to re-invent the wheel on balance discussions aka having a discussion about how to discuss things lol...there's about one of these posts per month or so that pop up with some guy that thinks he's mega smart and mystical with "the maths" -_- there's just so many things wrong in the OP and ironically "biased."

Do we really need another thread discussing how we should be discussing things and hordes of low post count people going, "wow you're so smart and amazing."

Nice effort sure...but i think a bit misplaced. Also, the entire premise of the thread doesn't work because there is no definitive model for imbalance. The model everyone uses for imbalance is...guess what?

Their personal bias and opinion. Notice my use of italics for emphasis.


Why would you make such a terrible post. Did you even read what he wrote?

You sound like a politician who argues with a scientist because he just doesn't like the facts.
Jombozeus
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
China1014 Posts
May 20 2011 06:33 GMT
#42

Top level data cannot be analysed using summary statistics. It requires a proper statistical analysis to draw any valid conclusions. Disregard any analysis that attempts to use data from high masters above the level where players begin to consistently have a 50% win/loss ratio since any conclusions they draw will likely be invalid.

There should be a gulf near GM/top masters where players experience a dip in their win/loss ratio below 50%. This should dispel the myth that win/loss ratios mean anything, even in master league.

The best place to take data is around this dip, where players begin to consistently have an overall 50% win/loss ratio. This is our upper statistical threshold. Above this point, statistical analysis is required.

Any effects of balance on racial win/loss ratios should be fairly consistent across leagues.

Imbalance doesn’t affect distributions in the silver, gold and platinum leagues.


How is this not saying that measuring balance should be taken at a level not at the top? The OP explicitly stated it in his conclusion, no one went out of their ways to disprove him.

Any effects on balance on racial win/loss ratios should be fairly consistent across leagues? Nope.

Imbalance doesn't affect distribution in the silver, gold and platinum leagues? Why does it suddenly matter at diamond and midmasters where the "dip" is? I'm high masters and I am in no way claiming that I play this game at even 50% of its maximum potential.

That upper statistical threshold is the most randomly made conclusion I've seen in my life. The OP went "ABC and therefore, Z."
Mojar
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia185 Posts
May 20 2011 06:37 GMT
#43
I like the concept you put forth in the OP however, balance should always be based of the elite level of play. This is an e-sport it has to be competitive to base balance decisions off of anything but pro-level play will do nothing but harm the competitive nature and scene of the game.
forSeohyun
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
504 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-20 06:44:22
May 20 2011 06:41 GMT
#44
On May 20 2011 14:08 Warble wrote:

Only masters/pros should talk about balance.

I am of the opinion that no player can truly talk about balance. Psychological studies have found that everybody has an inherent bias that favours themselves regardless of how unbiased they try to be. In other words, any balance suggestion by a pro will necessarily try to make his own race OP rather than to achieve objective balance, no matter how well-intentioned the pro is.


What about those that play random at one time, such as TLO or Nerchio, in what way would they be biased? If Tyler talked about ZvT-balance, would he be trying to favour him self?



On May 20 2011 14:08 Warble wrote:
This is often used by those who have learned a bit about statistics in high school.
You need a bigger sample size.

As this post uses no data at all, at best it proposes how data should be interpreted, this as no bearing on the matter.

On May 20 2011 14:08 Warble wrote:
We can only find imbalance by looking at the top level of play.

The problem here is that people tend to post simple summary statistics and graphs and call it a day. Consider, for example, if this game only had terran and no other races. Our statistics from GSL would show MKP and MVP winning most of their games against other terrans. Conclusion? It’s not terran that’s OP, it’s the players.

Now add the other races and players back in. When MKP plays against a protoss and wins, how much is a result of his race and how much of it is a result of his hard work and raw talent? The summary statistics do not show this.


I feel we should be talking about if imbalance can be found by looking at the statistics of top level play not the play in itself.
In general we could be looking at the statistics of the bottom, the top or the whole. The only thing that it should be noted is that the bottom or top should be large enough to reduce the variance of the data.

On May 20 2011 14:08 Warble wrote:
If everybody, especially pros, chooses a race, then that race must be imbalanced.
----
Maybe people choose a race because they have an affinity for it.


Here you posted a long analysis. However I didn't see a proposed remedy for sorting out the problems when differentiating affinities for races and imbalance.
The solution is this.

Get a huge number of players from the whole Blizzard-ladder randomly
Calculate how many Z, V, P and put them in three different lists -> stratified sampling.
Pick randomly (uniformly distributed) n items of each Z-, V-, P-list respectively, the number n must be smaller than the number of players of the least played race.

Now you can calculate imbalances without biasing your data.
On May 20 2011 14:08 Warble wrote:


The true numbers crop up when we compare them with each other. So out of 100 entrants, 40 are women and 60 are men. That means 150% more men enter college than women.


This is plain false, it is 50% more men.


Please, allay my following concerns or questions:

1. What education or experience do you have with statistics?
2. "I think it can’t be stated enough: GM and top masters is a bad place to be looking for racial imbalance." - No, it's perfectly viable as long as the sample group is large enough, what you can't do is take the player from 75-85% and use statistics on them.
You have to take an upper or lower x%, like the top 5% or GM-league.
3. What exactly does "Statistical analysis is the best way to analyse high level statistics." mean?
4. Do you believe it is impossible to the analyse imbalance without having Blizzard's data? Couldn't you have tried it with a ~100 random samples from the top of the league?
Seohyun fan
Torpedo.Vegas
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1890 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-20 08:05:02
May 20 2011 06:44 GMT
#45
On May 20 2011 15:37 Mojar wrote:
I like the concept you put forth in the OP however, balance should always be based of the elite level of play. This is an e-sport it has to be competitive to base balance decisions off of anything but pro-level play will do nothing but harm the competitive nature and scene of the game.


Perhaps I interpreted this wrong, but I believe he is not arguing to what demographics the game out to balanced for with respect to choosing sample statistics, rather that regardless what you pick, using the elite or noobs own opinions would be both make it invalid due to biases. Also, even if you cater only to the elite, there are still many factors that need to be considered outside the game including individual player skill and other variables outside the objective race itself. So, uses lower skilled players could help isolate the fundamental game errors from the skill based QQ,
denzelz
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States604 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-20 06:49:48
May 20 2011 06:48 GMT
#46
Like others have said before, a long post doesn't mean it is a good post. There is definitely merit to approaching things in a scientific and mathematical way but we must also be aware of all the assumptions that were made along the way and make sure that the conclusion and analysis aligh in with the actual methods or initial hypothesis.

The rationale for the study is admirable, and I agree with the type of basic mathematical techniques used, but the assumptions that skill levels are linear and that race choice by Starcraft 2 players is proof for balance (because of the human tendency to optimize, thus reaching race equilibrium?) are quite debatable. With these assumptions alone, this study cannot be considered the "end-all" research on balance. And no, this is not nit-picking on small flaws in a study, but you are making very major assumptions that should not be ignored.

Further, conclusions made at the end are not supported by any of the data and analysis in the sections previous. What part of the data proves that Master/Pro levels should not be used for balance analysis? Your point about trends in one region alone cannot be interpreted as imbalance makes intuitive sense, but what part of your methods actually proves that? And the part about your faith in Blizzard?

Your study would be a lot better if you just presented your results and your methods. Instead, much of your "myth-busting" is just your own opinions and experiences.
I_Destroy
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada22 Posts
May 20 2011 06:49 GMT
#47
This is how day(9) looks at balance lol
P.S. Great Post!
Uniden fighting!!!!!!!!-Day[9]
johanngrunt
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Hong Kong1555 Posts
May 20 2011 06:49 GMT
#48
On May 20 2011 14:10 usa11220 wrote:
best first post ever?


Definitely.


Dear OP

Most of the math you explained it in a way that's easy to understand. Thanks for this =)
TehForce
Profile Joined July 2010
1072 Posts
May 20 2011 06:49 GMT
#49
On May 20 2011 15:44 Torpedo.Vegas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 20 2011 15:37 Mojar wrote:
I like the concept you put forth in the OP however, balance should always be based of the elite level of play. This is an e-sport it has to be competitive to base balance decisions off of anything but pro-level play will do nothing but harm the competitive nature and scene of the game.


Perhaps I interpreted this wrong, but I believe he is now arguing to what demographics the game out to balanced for with respect to choosing sample statistics, rather that regardless what you pick, using the elite or noobs own opinions would be both make it invalid due to biases. Also, even if you cater only to the elite, there are still many factors that need to be considered outside the game including individual player skill and other variables outside the objective race itself. So, uses lower skilled players could help isolate the fundamental game errors from the skill based QQ,


Yeah but i dont care if Protoss or Terran has 70% Winrate against the other races up until Masters. (which it has not). As long as it is balanced on top level, imbalances in the lower leagues doesn't matter.
NesTea <3
MangoTango
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States3670 Posts
May 20 2011 06:49 GMT
#50
So much truth, so little time. *golf clap* Well done.
"One fish, two fish, red fish, BLUE TANK!" - Artosis
uzas
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia52 Posts
May 20 2011 06:57 GMT
#51
On May 20 2011 15:00 avilo wrote:
Just because someone made an incredibly long post does not make it mega awesome or even remotely accurate.

The most obvious thing completely wrong with the "post" is to not look at pros for balance. In any RTS game or game you always look at the top level for balance because these are the people playing the game at the highest level and are actively trying to "break the game."

Really all the OP is saying (but ironically not doing in many of his examples in the OP) is: "don't be biased with your balance judgements."

Nothing new...and there's no need to go into "intricate mathematics" or math at all for any of this...the OP is overcomplicating things, and likely has not enough experience to legitimately comment on balance or imbalance in the first place.

The most qualified people to talk about balance are the pro players and people high up on ladder that are playing the game everyday versus other good players.

But 99% of these players are trying to practice and improve themselves and not even worry about balance in the first place, though everyone QQ sometimes.

imo OP is just trying to re-invent the wheel on balance discussions aka having a discussion about how to discuss things lol...there's about one of these posts per month or so that pop up with some guy that thinks he's mega smart and mystical with "the maths" -_- there's just so many things wrong in the OP and ironically "biased."

Do we really need another thread discussing how we should be discussing things and hordes of low post count people going, "wow you're so smart and amazing."

Nice effort sure...but i think a bit misplaced. Also, the entire premise of the thread doesn't work because there is no definitive model for imbalance. The model everyone uses for imbalance is...guess what?

Their personal bias and opinion. Notice my use of italics for emphasis.


This is so true.
DiDigital
Profile Joined February 2011
75 Posts
May 20 2011 07:00 GMT
#52
One thing I think you may have neglected to mention when discussing problems with looking at the top of the ladder is the fact that blizzard has probability statistics on the expected results of each specific game played on bnet. This is the basis of the points we earn from our games. So while looking at win ratios for the top of the ladder is useless, point totals and the related data should be more accurate.

Also I'd love to see a graph of the matchup win percentages based on a moving average of the entire MMR spectrum. I'm sure blizzard has something like this, and I imagine you could make a lot of balance conclusions by seeing this data.

Lastly, your analysis dealt specifically with evaluating game results. Even if we can prove imbalance through your methods there is still the challenge of identifying the exact in game imbalance.
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
May 20 2011 07:02 GMT
#53

Yet these players with sub-50% win/loss ratios are both by rank and by nature superior players to their peers with 50% win/loss ratios. Their low ratios come from the fact that they’re so good they’re the only amateurs who get matched against professional level players. This low ratio comes from the assumption that there is a significant skill gap between amateur players and professional players. We know that at the top level, skill gaps can be huge because Idra has a huge win/loss ratio.


There are very few players (relatively) with 70-80% W/L ratios, so the best players outside those ratios will face ~50% ratio players most of the time, and if they're truly better they'll have a higher than 50% win rate against those. Over hundreds of games the better players should have a higher winrate unless 70-80% win ratio players are literally laddering all the time.

How much math have you taken, OP? By your post I'm guessing you're a second-year math undergrad, or maybe an engineering/science major.
Beakyboo
Profile Joined May 2010
United States485 Posts
May 20 2011 07:02 GMT
#54
Your analysis is seriously convoluted and you draw no apparently meaningful conclusions that I can infer. I don't think too many people at the moment put much faith in arguments about balance based on statistics. It's bothersome that something like this can actually get so much praise from people who've neither read nor understood it simply because they think it looks intelligent.

Coming from a math major, most of your points are only made more confusing by the math you attempt to justify them with and can be inferred without it far more concisely. It really feels that you've only included a lot of math for the sake of attempting to appear credible.
Holy_AT
Profile Joined July 2010
Austria978 Posts
May 20 2011 07:06 GMT
#55
I am sorry, I dont quiet agree with your post.
In my opinion it lacks of data to back it up. In many cases you present some facts and present your opinion, while the same facts would lead others to another opinion.
Some of your conclusions are based on the concept of player skill, but "player skill" is subjective and can not be defined very well.
In my oppinion there are too much asumptions in this post, I think it would be better to break it down and focus on smaller practical details then to try and cover the whole balance discussion with assumptions and opinions.
forSeohyun
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
504 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-20 07:20:04
May 20 2011 07:08 GMT
#56
On May 20 2011 15:44 Torpedo.Vegas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 20 2011 15:37 Mojar wrote:
I like the concept you put forth in the OP however, balance should always be based of the elite level of play. This is an e-sport it has to be competitive to base balance decisions off of anything but pro-level play will do nothing but harm the competitive nature and scene of the game.


Perhaps I interpreted this wrong, but I believe he is now arguing to what demographics the game out to balanced for with respect to choosing sample statistics, rather that regardless what you pick, using the elite or noobs own opinions would be both make it invalid due to biases. Also, even if you cater only to the elite, there are still many factors that need to be considered outside the game including individual player skill and other variables outside the objective race itself. So, uses lower skilled players could help isolate the fundamental game errors from the skill based QQ,


No.

The question is if you want the game to be balanced for the elite as a whole, everybody as a whole or both (you probably don't want too balance it for the bottom 5% in bronze league if it means sacrificing balance in another).
Here I mean balance as in the average win-ratio for a race.
So there is five viable options:

1. The imbalance is linear for every player with a win ratio between 0-100%, great you can balance the top 1%'s match-ups and bronze league will be balanced as well.
2. The balance is non-linear, so that people with different skill levels will be affected (in changed win rate) differently.What do you do then:
2a. You try to make the average win ratio 50% when considering all players.
2b. You try to cater for a specified percentage of players so that they achieve 50% win ratio amongst themselves
2c. You try to make balance changes which are the "inverse" to the non-linear balance, which could be practically impossible.
2d. A compromise between a,b,c

What is Blizzard's strategy? I don't know.

If the case is 1. or 2b. you only need to apply statistics to a elite percentage of players.
If the case is 2a, 2c, 2d you will have to sample the whole interval of players.
Seohyun fan
omisa
Profile Joined January 2011
United States494 Posts
May 20 2011 07:11 GMT
#57
On May 20 2011 15:00 avilo wrote:

The most obvious thing completely wrong with the "post" is to not look at pros for balance. In any RTS game or game you always look at the top level for balance because these are the people playing the game at the highest level and are actively trying to "break the game."
.


The most obvious thing wrong with your post is you assume you're right.

Amazing OP. It seems the whole point of it is to look at the balance situation with a little less bias and to not automatically assume rumors of imbalance are actually true. If anything is to be assumed, its that you are wrong (this goes for everybody).
\m/
Deltablazy
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada580 Posts
May 20 2011 07:12 GMT
#58
mind=blown

Good job dude. Enjoyed every second of reading your post
Jombozeus
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
China1014 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-20 07:18:09
May 20 2011 07:17 GMT
#59
On May 20 2011 16:11 omisa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 20 2011 15:00 avilo wrote:

The most obvious thing completely wrong with the "post" is to not look at pros for balance. In any RTS game or game you always look at the top level for balance because these are the people playing the game at the highest level and are actively trying to "break the game."
.


The most obvious thing wrong with your post is you assume you're right.

Amazing OP. It seems the whole point of it is to look at the balance situation with a little less bias and to not automatically assume rumors of imbalance are actually true. If anything is to be assumed, its that you are wrong (this goes for everybody).


Cool, so we have reached a conclusion that the OP is wrong despite also being amazing. Doublethink it is!
Essentia
Profile Joined July 2010
1150 Posts
May 20 2011 07:17 GMT
#60
On May 20 2011 16:11 omisa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 20 2011 15:00 avilo wrote:

The most obvious thing completely wrong with the "post" is to not look at pros for balance. In any RTS game or game you always look at the top level for balance because these are the people playing the game at the highest level and are actively trying to "break the game."
.


The most obvious thing wrong with your post is you assume you're right.

Amazing OP. It seems the whole point of it is to look at the balance situation with a little less bias and to not automatically assume rumors of imbalance are actually true. If anything is to be assumed, its that you are wrong (this goes for everybody).



Ok, then explain why the game shouldn't be balanced around pro play/
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
GSL Code S
09:30
Ro8 - Group A
Maru vs SolarLIVE!
Rogue vs TBD
GuMiho vs TBD
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech76
EnDerr 48
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28330
Calm 6579
Rain 3925
Bisu 2319
Jaedong 1050
Pusan 780
Horang2 585
BeSt 387
EffOrt 207
TY 191
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 154
Last 123
ToSsGirL 107
PianO 106
Mini 61
Hyun 61
Shine 49
[sc1f]eonzerg 45
Killer 40
Aegong 37
ZerO 32
NaDa 22
Dewaltoss 21
Movie 20
Barracks 18
sorry 18
Sharp 18
Sacsri 13
HiyA 9
JYJ8
Mong 3
Dota 2
XcaliburYe457
BananaSlamJamma402
420jenkins366
Fuzer 213
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss898
x6flipin206
Super Smash Bros
Westballz10
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor168
Other Games
singsing2051
crisheroes285
Pyrionflax250
Crank 230
DeMusliM211
XaKoH 169
B2W.Neo55
ZerO(Twitch)4
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream7537
Other Games
gamesdonequick366
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 39
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV104
Upcoming Events
Online Event
13h 8m
Replay Cast
15h 8m
GSL Code S
22h 38m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
23h 8m
Replay Cast
1d 13h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.