• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:38
CEST 15:38
KST 22:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21
Community News
[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)33ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo23Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted SC2 Planner - The StarCraft II Build Planner [TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK #4 20-21th June Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed
Brood War
General
Fact based Zerg Upgrade Tier List BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ STARCRAFT MOVIE - Last Night at the Command center BW General Discussion Battle cruiser feet vs Carrier fleet
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSLAN 4 is Coming! Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread [H]Internet/Gaming Cafe Tips and Tricks The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How To Predict Tilt in Espor…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9942 users

Patch 1.3.3 PTR - Page 77

Forum Index > SC2 General
4401 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 75 76 77 78 79 221 Next
Massive units are not affected by concussive shells. If you think they are, you are wrong.
It's SPORE crawlers that are being changed, not SPINE. Please read carefully.
MrGreyness
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia35 Posts
April 26 2011 14:06 GMT
#1521
Are these changes supposed to be live on the PTR? Warpgates and gateway unit build time hasn't been changed when I tried to test the changes in a custom game.
frucisky
Profile Joined September 2010
Singapore2170 Posts
April 26 2011 14:07 GMT
#1522
On April 26 2011 23:00 sp00n- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2011 22:52 frucisky wrote:
I'd much rather have seen a concomitant Spore Crawler build time buff so it makes it a little more forgiving if I get surprised by Stargate units. You're saying that it's made to deflect Banshees and Phoenixes easier. But it doesn't make sense since any good Zerg player will place the spores properly in the first place to defend the drones.


You're spore in the mineral line has just been killed with voidrays and the queen is also dead because of pheonix lift. You have few spores left but when you uproot them voidray will focus one and then move again....

This change is needed. Wouldnt mind for Spine crawlers also receiving this buff.


You have a point, though very situational. Most of the times I play, I either have a bunch of spores almost completed or I just see the VR and start the spores. In the latter case, the spores will definitely get killed by the void ray + phoenix combo. In the former case, my properly positioned spores + still popping queens will defend the harass.

A lot of theorycraft though and I welcome any buff but if Blizzard's aim was to make the P air harass easier to defend for Z and build time buff for spore's woulda been a way better choice.
<3 DongRaeGu <3
clusen
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany8702 Posts
April 26 2011 14:07 GMT
#1523
On April 26 2011 22:52 frucisky wrote:
I'd much rather have seen a concomitant Spore Crawler build time buff so it makes it a little more forgiving if I get surprised by Stargate units. You're saying that it's made to deflect Banshees and Phoenixes easier. But it doesn't make sense since any good Zerg player will place the spores properly in the first place to defend the drones.

This change makes it kinda possible to defend Banshees/Rays when you were surprised, because you can now build spores somewhere else and move them into your mineral line, which was impossible before because they would all die while rooting. No, it's not effective(and it shouldn't be), but it is something.

No Zerg is able to place Spores properly when surprised because they die while building :p And since we don't have T1 AA that can be built as a reaction(Queens take way too long) I like this change.
Necro)Phagist(
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada6660 Posts
April 26 2011 14:08 GMT
#1524
On April 26 2011 23:04 Danzo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2011 22:59 RogerChillingworth wrote:
On April 26 2011 22:56 TimeSpiral wrote:
Did Protoss just get buffed, rofl? That's amazing.

On the flipside, it looks like Warpgate research was nerfed a little bit. That's actually a pretty big deal. The 4 Warpgate attack will be slightly bigger now, but also about 20-25 seconds later. It doesn't address the fundamental problems with Protoss right now, but maybe HoTS will do that :/

Terran gets Nerfed, ROFL!

The bunker is on the only defensive structure in the game that does not increase area DPS for cost. It's the only defensive structure that can be halted mid-construction by a minimum of a single worker unit. Its sole advantage was that it added a little durability to barracks units that are stationary, in the form of "armor (HP)." You're essentially paying for additional HP per unit in a given area plus get a slight range buff. If the bunker was destroyed, or mass repaired (this costs money), the salvage feature was negated. That was the primary benefit of a bunker. This is a silly, and stupid change.

I'm on the fence about the Ghost. We'll have to see how that works out. Seems like it could be a buff, but where are our free spell casters (Sentry/HT)? + Show Spoiler [tongue and cheek] +
Slightly kidding about this, but those two units are stupid cheap for their value.


Zerg gets buffed? Cool. I don't mind that, especially since they are terrified of the necessary Infestor nerf and don't appear to be getting one any time soon.



1. Putting your shit in bold doesn't make it correct.

2. Terran didn't get nerfed. Ghosts got buffed, bunkers return 75 instead of 100 minerals. Hardly a nerf.


"Hardly a nerf" But still a nerd that's not actually necessary. lol Yeah blizzard the way to stop that terran force is too attack their bunkers! Seriously? It's bad enough it takes long just hold to out but now strip us of our resource? When was the last time you guys saw offensive bunkers being useful against zerg?


I guess you haven't watched boxers play vs zerg? almost every game he throws up an offensive bunker while expanding behind it... lmao @"Strip us of our resources" Your bunker will cost you half a fucking marine.... seriously its insane that you think bunkers being free wasn't broken. change has been needed for a long fucking time!
"Are you talking to me? Because your authority is not recognized in fort kick ass!"" ||Park Jung Suk|| |MC|HerO|HyuN|
frucisky
Profile Joined September 2010
Singapore2170 Posts
April 26 2011 14:09 GMT
#1525
On April 26 2011 23:07 clusen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2011 22:52 frucisky wrote:
I'd much rather have seen a concomitant Spore Crawler build time buff so it makes it a little more forgiving if I get surprised by Stargate units. You're saying that it's made to deflect Banshees and Phoenixes easier. But it doesn't make sense since any good Zerg player will place the spores properly in the first place to defend the drones.

This change makes it kinda possible to defend Banshees/Rays when you were surprised, because you can now build spores somewhere else and move them into your mineral line, which was impossible before because they would all die while rooting. No, it's not effective(and it shouldn't be), but it is something.

No Zerg is able to place Spores properly when surprised because they die while building :p And since we don't have T1 AA that can be built as a reaction(Queens take way too long) I like this change.


I suppose you've a point there but you can only put spores on creep and that isn't somewhere an opponent going air isn't going to be able to spot. But as I said, I welcome any Zerg buff :D
<3 DongRaeGu <3
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
April 26 2011 14:09 GMT
#1526
hehe my 2 gate early pressure build just became more dangerouse, well unless more people will use it, then people are prepared for this sob.
Nice to see hts got a buff, nice they want to make ghosts more viable with mech, but i would have left minerals the same.

The zealot build time change is like many people have put it extremly funny, since they buff nerfed the time already several times >.>. (take into consideration that the last nerf was aimed at the warp gate cooldown of the zealot as people could replinish their army to fast late game.)

Since it didn't affected hts and the cooldown time is better still, there won't be lots of strats with gate only, probably the 4 non warp gate push, that will hit earlier then the 4 gate on smaller maps .
But since i went for robo before warp in pvp i am fine anyway ^.^. can save me a gate that way
Cheerio
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Ukraine3178 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-26 14:14:47
April 26 2011 14:11 GMT
#1527
On April 26 2011 22:30 sluggaslamoo wrote:
Just like concussive and all these other 50/50 upgrades that make no sense, take an extremely long time to research and require no tech pattern or planning at all.

Agreed. Those are artificial upgrades. When I think about those I dont understand why is marauder a viable T1 unit and hydra isnt. They put it at T2 where it still has little use while zerg struggles defending against air at T1 and they have to bring another artificial change to make up for it (spores). Balance of sc1 was pure genius, I guess people behind it no longer work for Blizzard.
TwilightStar
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States649 Posts
April 26 2011 14:11 GMT
#1528
I think the pylon change is absolutely unnecessary...

Does the archon change mean they can knock down FF?
(5)Twilight Star.scx --------- AdmiralHoth: There was one week when I didn't shave for a month.
{ToT}ColmA
Profile Joined November 2007
Japan3260 Posts
April 26 2011 14:11 GMT
#1529
hm... would like to see the pylon range thingy in action to see where it has to be placed on like shakuras / xelnaga to do the bottom pylon top gates stuff now~

would ve liked to see some raven change thou
The only virgins in kpop left are the fans
Striding Strider
Profile Joined February 2011
United Kingdom787 Posts
April 26 2011 14:12 GMT
#1530
On April 26 2011 23:05 Alexl wrote:
So a 4gate nerf in exchange for an overall protoss buff and no adressing of mass wg warp-ins to reinforce instantly in 200pop fights when others need to wait?


This coming from a Zerg? Seriously?
I have a beard. I'm unprofessional.
papaz
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden4149 Posts
April 26 2011 14:12 GMT
#1531
On April 26 2011 23:11 TwilightStar wrote:
I think the pylon change is absolutely unnecessary...

Does the archon change mean they can knock down FF?


yes
TimeSpiral
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1010 Posts
April 26 2011 14:12 GMT
#1532
On April 26 2011 22:59 RogerChillingworth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2011 22:56 TimeSpiral wrote:
Did Protoss just get buffed, rofl? That's amazing.

On the flipside, it looks like Warpgate research was nerfed a little bit. That's actually a pretty big deal. The 4 Warpgate attack will be slightly bigger now, but also about 20-25 seconds later. It doesn't address the fundamental problems with Protoss right now, but maybe HoTS will do that :/

Terran gets Nerfed, ROFL!

The bunker is on the only defensive structure in the game that does not increase area DPS for cost. It's the only defensive structure that can be halted mid-construction by a minimum of a single worker unit. Its sole advantage was that it added a little durability to barracks units that are stationary, in the form of "armor (HP)." You're essentially paying for additional HP per unit in a given area plus get a slight range buff. If the bunker was destroyed, or mass repaired (this costs money), the salvage feature was negated. That was the primary benefit of a bunker. This is a silly, and stupid change.

I'm on the fence about the Ghost. We'll have to see how that works out. Seems like it could be a buff, but where are our free spell casters (Sentry/HT)? + Show Spoiler [tongue and cheek] +
Slightly kidding about this, but those two units are stupid cheap for their value.


Zerg gets buffed? Cool. I don't mind that, especially since they are terrified of the necessary Infestor nerf and don't appear to be getting one any time soon.



1. Putting your shit in bold doesn't make it correct.

2. Terran didn't get nerfed. Ghosts got buffed, bunkers return 75 instead of 100 minerals. Hardly a nerf.


Roger, it's called formatting. Is it not apparent that the bold style is to create the feeling of headlines and sub-headlines? Deal with it. + Show Spoiler [zany theory] +
Or is he actually saying bold text implies some level of authority over non-bold text? Lol. If this is so I should have not even replied at all.


(2) Terran didn't get nerfed? Good luck explaining that one. The Ghost and the Raven are the most expensive spell-casters in the game. That remains unchanged. Moving some of the gas cost to minerals is a plus in early game (when Ghosts are not used) and may encourage a few early Ghost plays, so like I said, I'm going to let this one pan out.

The bunker change is a nerf (no way to argue that), and the Archon buff is an indirect nerf to Terran bio armies (this is debatable). The amount of kiting and micro required to fight an a+clicked Protoss deathball is already silly, this is just going to make it much worse. This will probably encourage more Terrans to transition into Ghost Mech in lategame versus Protoss. Maybe this is a good thing. Only time (and Blizzard) will tell.
[G] Positioning, Formations, and Tactics: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=187892
jacobmarlow
Profile Joined March 2008
Canada100 Posts
April 26 2011 14:12 GMT
#1533
Horrible changes to protoss. Now zerg has an additional 40 seconds to do whatever the f they want. We already have so many limited options in terms of tech this makes it a lot lot worse. Literally this means the end of any pressure protoss players can put on zerg, unless we try to chrono out units early with the reduced build times.

I am a diamond level toss and simply talking to zerg players online, they win a clear majority of their games versus protoss at ease. I love how roaches, the cheap unit that they are, literally counters all protoss ground units except the immortal which can only be built 1 at a time and cost 3 roaches and some more gas. Also lets not forget, zerglings counter immortals....
Pred8oar
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany281 Posts
April 26 2011 14:13 GMT
#1534
I generally like this change but i kind of smell proxy 2gates in pvp and 2gate in close positions vs a Zerg like meta are gonna backfire . The ghost change also might screw the protoss players over and i dont see why they changed it, infestors for example do cost a crap ton of gas and ghosts dont? Oo
Ragoo
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany2773 Posts
April 26 2011 14:14 GMT
#1535
On April 26 2011 22:50 WhiteDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2011 22:46 Ragoo wrote:
On April 26 2011 22:41 Chicken Chaser wrote:
On April 26 2011 22:38 Sanguinarius wrote:
I seriously LOVE massive archons. They have needed to do that for so long.

What if they change the Archon size too to be like a Thor? And then increase splash radius? Walking Psi Storm on the loose!


I hope they will buff Archon further. Like faster movement, less collision size or damage/splash/range/attack speed buff. HT/Archon is the only alternative to Collossus in PvZ lategame but Archon sucks too much to make it happen

LoL ? Archon are not weak, but colo are OP so it makes them worthless. They do not need any buff, they are already pretty good but nobody make them. They're great to tank ultra, great against ling, not good against roach & hydra.

Archon zealot stalker colo & some templar is awesome late game protoss unit composition in PvZ.

Protoss get the habit to think that every units should be good against every units.


That's not much, being good against Ultras which are a shitty unit anyway and pwning lings which are basically killed by storm before.
Maybe their dps and splash is fine , but the collision size, speed and range means they will most likely not be able to fight anyway. They are neither good in chokes nor good with forcefields which makes them so much worse than Collossi in PvZ.
Member of TPW mapmaking team/// twitter.com/Ragoo_ /// "goody represents border between explainable reason and supernatural" Cloud
R3N
Profile Joined March 2011
740 Posts
April 26 2011 14:14 GMT
#1536
TvZ is widely considered as a balanced matchup. So what does blizzard do? Buff Terran rofl.

On a more serious note Infestors are really good, sometimes borderline OP so I think this is a reasonable buff.

BUT
Ghosts are OP against protoss and this buff will make it even worse.
BUT
Since I hate protoss I don't mind that at all

ALL Hail Ghost buff!
DeLiriuMs
Profile Joined December 2010
Bulgaria40 Posts
April 26 2011 14:15 GMT
#1537
Ok. So the 2gate proxy is the new 4gate i guess :D
Nakas
Profile Joined May 2010
United States148 Posts
April 26 2011 14:15 GMT
#1538
On April 26 2011 23:00 sp00n- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2011 22:52 frucisky wrote:
I'd much rather have seen a concomitant Spore Crawler build time buff so it makes it a little more forgiving if I get surprised by Stargate units. You're saying that it's made to deflect Banshees and Phoenixes easier. But it doesn't make sense since any good Zerg player will place the spores properly in the first place to defend the drones.


You're spore in the mineral line has just been killed with voidrays and the queen is also dead because of pheonix lift. You have few spores left but when you uproot them voidray will focus one and then move again....

This change is needed. Wouldnt mind for Spine crawlers also receiving this buff.


If zerg is so far behind with anti-air against protoss stargate play that they're killing spore crawlers, that's pretty much gg. Chasing after a charged void ray with an uprooted spore crawler is not going to save that game.
Necro)Phagist(
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada6660 Posts
April 26 2011 14:16 GMT
#1539
On April 26 2011 23:12 TimeSpiral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2011 22:59 RogerChillingworth wrote:
On April 26 2011 22:56 TimeSpiral wrote:
Did Protoss just get buffed, rofl? That's amazing.

On the flipside, it looks like Warpgate research was nerfed a little bit. That's actually a pretty big deal. The 4 Warpgate attack will be slightly bigger now, but also about 20-25 seconds later. It doesn't address the fundamental problems with Protoss right now, but maybe HoTS will do that :/

Terran gets Nerfed, ROFL!

The bunker is on the only defensive structure in the game that does not increase area DPS for cost. It's the only defensive structure that can be halted mid-construction by a minimum of a single worker unit. Its sole advantage was that it added a little durability to barracks units that are stationary, in the form of "armor (HP)." You're essentially paying for additional HP per unit in a given area plus get a slight range buff. If the bunker was destroyed, or mass repaired (this costs money), the salvage feature was negated. That was the primary benefit of a bunker. This is a silly, and stupid change.

I'm on the fence about the Ghost. We'll have to see how that works out. Seems like it could be a buff, but where are our free spell casters (Sentry/HT)? + Show Spoiler [tongue and cheek] +
Slightly kidding about this, but those two units are stupid cheap for their value.


Zerg gets buffed? Cool. I don't mind that, especially since they are terrified of the necessary Infestor nerf and don't appear to be getting one any time soon.



1. Putting your shit in bold doesn't make it correct.

2. Terran didn't get nerfed. Ghosts got buffed, bunkers return 75 instead of 100 minerals. Hardly a nerf.


Roger, it's called formatting. Is it not apparent that the bold style is to create the feeling of headlines and sub-headlines? Deal with it. + Show Spoiler [zany theory] +
Or is he actually saying bold text implies some level of authority over non-bold text? Lol. If this is so I should have not even replied at all.


(2) Terran didn't get nerfed? Good luck explaining that one. The Ghost and the Raven are the most expensive spell-casters in the game. That remains unchanged. Moving some of the gas cost to minerals is a plus in early game (when Ghosts are not used) and may encourage a few early Ghost plays, so like I said, I'm going to let this one pan out.

The bunker change is a nerf (no way to argue that), and the Archon buff is an indirect nerf to Terran bio armies (this is debatable). The amount of kiting and micro required to fight an a+clicked Protoss deathball is already silly, this is just going to make it much worse. This will probably encourage more Terrans to transition into Ghost Mech in lategame versus Protoss. Maybe this is a good thing. Only time (and Blizzard) will tell.


Bunkers being free was retarded. to so much a nerf more fixing then anything. as for Archon being a "Nerf" to Terran. God forbid a Protoss death ball consisting of 2 different tier 3 units should be able to a move your tier 1 infantry army.... Seriously the fact that Terrans have been able to stay on tier 1 bio for 30 minute macro games and win is just fucking silly.....
"Are you talking to me? Because your authority is not recognized in fort kick ass!"" ||Park Jung Suk|| |MC|HerO|HyuN|
mprs
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada2933 Posts
April 26 2011 14:17 GMT
#1540
On April 26 2011 22:56 TimeSpiral wrote:
Did Protoss just get buffed, rofl? That's amazing.

Terran gets Nerfed, ROFL!

The bunker is on the only defensive structure in the game that does not increase area DPS for cost. It's the only defensive structure that can be halted mid-construction by a minimum of a single worker unit. Its sole advantage was that it added a little durability to barracks units that are stationary, in the form of "armor (HP)." You're essentially paying for additional HP per unit in a given area plus get a slight range buff. If the bunker was destroyed, or mass repaired (this costs money), the salvage feature was negated. That was the primary benefit of a bunker. This is a silly, and stupid change.

I'm on the fence about the Ghost. We'll have to see how that works out. Seems like it could be a buff, but where are our free spell casters (Sentry/HT)? + Show Spoiler [tongue and cheek] +
Slightly kidding about this, but those two units are stupid cheap for their value.


Zerg gets buffed? Cool. I don't mind that, especially since they are terrified of the necessary Infestor nerf and don't appear to be getting one any time soon.



You can't look at these changes and say that T got nerfed with a straight face. You are under-valuing that ghost change. It will help vs infestors osooooooooooooooooooooooooo much.

losing 25 minerals on bunker salvages is like the most negligible change ever compared to everything else in this patch.
We talkin about PRACTICE
Prev 1 75 76 77 78 79 221 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #136
herO vs PercivalLIVE!
TBD vs SHIN
CranKy Ducklings331
Ryung 223
SHIN 89
CranKy Ducklings SOOP20
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 778
Ryung 223
Rex 103
SHIN 89
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 1428
Mini 1066
firebathero 786
EffOrt 740
Shuttle 710
Hyuk 615
Soma 514
Light 419
actioN 261
ggaemo 228
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 207
Zeus 201
Mong 189
Snow 171
Rush 155
Sharp 108
hero 91
Sea.KH 66
Hyun 62
[sc1f]eonzerg 53
Movie 52
JulyZerg 45
ToSsGirL 41
PianO 34
Free 32
scan(afreeca) 26
JYJ 24
GoRush 22
Hm[arnc] 20
Shine 16
sorry 15
Sacsri 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Terrorterran 9
Dota 2
Gorgc6556
Dendi942
syndereN206
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1732
Other Games
singsing1997
B2W.Neo910
Lowko587
Pyrionflax164
DeMusliM91
QueenE68
Trikslyr19
BEARDiaguz10
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream5579
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2100
• Nemesis1068
• TFBlade750
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
20h 22m
Douyu Cup 2020
1d 15h
Oliveira vs Trap
Jieshi vs XY
soO vs FanTaSy
TY vs Coffee
OSC
2 days
Douyu Cup 2020
2 days
Neeb vs Impact
MacSed vs Cyan
Scarlett vs Kelazhur
INnoVation vs Dear
Douyu Cup 2020
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
herO vs Classic
Maru vs Serral
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
4 days
Douyu Cup 2020
4 days
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
5 days
Online Event
5 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-19
WardiTV Spring 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 1
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.