• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:03
CEST 03:03
KST 10:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !10Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results1
StarCraft 2
General
MaNa leaves Team Liquid Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers $5,000 WardiTV Spring Championship 2026 Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! SC2 INu's Battles#16 <BO.9> Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
(Spoiler) Interview ASL Ro4 Day 2 Winner Data needed Flashes ASL S21 Ro8 Review ASL Tickets to Live Event Finals? Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8)
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Semifinals A [BSL22] RO16 Group Stage - 02 - 10 May
Strategy
[G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6225 users

E-stars Seoul pulls out Blizzard games - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
KlaCkoN
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Sweden1661 Posts
March 03 2011 21:07 GMT
#81
On March 04 2011 05:38 PrinceXizor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 03 2011 23:21 Markus138 wrote:
I was trying to get some information about it, but I couldn't really find anything about the situation. Can anyone explain to me what the problem with KESPA and Blizzard is? (or link me to a thread if I accidently missed it)



when KESPA started charging broadcasting companies for the rights to broadcast their starcraft tournaments, blizzard took offense and made the claim that since starcraft was their game, charging for broadcast right of their product isn't something KESPA can do, since they do not own the Intellectual Property rights to starcraft. KESPA then claimed that starcraft was public domain.

gretech and OGN were willing to negotiate with blizzard for IP rights in korea.

KESPA didn't like this at all, OGN without warning or explanation drops out of negotiating right before announcing more (now questionably legal) starleagues after a deadline set by blizzard.


lawsuits have now been filed and hearings are being made.

To my knowledge KESPA aren't charging OGN and MBC for broadcasting starcraft at all, they are charging them for using KESPA affiliated players in their broadcasts.
"Voice or no voice the people can always be brought to the bidding of their leaders ... All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-03 21:11:37
March 03 2011 21:09 GMT
#82
On March 04 2011 06:07 KlaCkoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2011 05:38 PrinceXizor wrote:
On March 03 2011 23:21 Markus138 wrote:
I was trying to get some information about it, but I couldn't really find anything about the situation. Can anyone explain to me what the problem with KESPA and Blizzard is? (or link me to a thread if I accidently missed it)



when KESPA started charging broadcasting companies for the rights to broadcast their starcraft tournaments, blizzard took offense and made the claim that since starcraft was their game, charging for broadcast right of their product isn't something KESPA can do, since they do not own the Intellectual Property rights to starcraft. KESPA then claimed that starcraft was public domain.

gretech and OGN were willing to negotiate with blizzard for IP rights in korea.

KESPA didn't like this at all, OGN without warning or explanation drops out of negotiating right before announcing more (now questionably legal) starleagues after a deadline set by blizzard.


lawsuits have now been filed and hearings are being made.

To my knowledge KESPA aren't charging OGN and MBC for broadcasting starcraft at all, they are charging them for using KESPA affiliated players in their broadcasts.

They are charging for broadcasting rights to the KESPA sanctioned starcraft tournaments. not for starcraft specifically, but their own tournaments of it. charging for rights to have a person on tv is in definite violation of some civil rights as in order for that to be lawful KESPA would have to own the players as property. but their own tournaments is as least something they can claim they have rights to.
branflakes14
Profile Joined July 2010
2082 Posts
March 03 2011 21:12 GMT
#83
Wait, isn't this just cutting off your nose to spite your face?
RoosterSamurai
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Japan2108 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-03 21:13:58
March 03 2011 21:13 GMT
#84
Honestly, KeSPA was the only reason I even got back into starcraft, so if the progaming scene disappears, then I'll just go play another non-blizzard game...
I'm better at FPS games anyway.
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-03 21:15:13
March 03 2011 21:14 GMT
#85
On March 04 2011 06:12 branflakes14 wrote:
Wait, isn't this just cutting off your nose to spite your face?

nah it's more like being put between a rock and a hard place.

if they go against KESPA they have to run blizzard events without KESPA players ever.
if they go against Blizzard they can't run blizzard events. however if KESPA wins the IP rights lawsuit, they can run blizzard events with KESPA players in the future.

pretty much by KESPA putting pressure on them, they are forced to have this year be bad. but they are banking on the future with this.
bkrow
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Australia8532 Posts
March 03 2011 21:34 GMT
#86
Sad to see top level politics getting in the way of ground level tournaments more reason for this to get cleared up as soon as possible!
In The Rear With The Gear .. *giggle* /////////// cobra-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA!!!!
Baarn
Profile Joined April 2010
United States2702 Posts
March 03 2011 21:37 GMT
#87
Gotta love these union busting times.
There's no S in KT. :P
zhurai
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States5660 Posts
March 03 2011 21:41 GMT
#88
On March 04 2011 06:04 KlaCkoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 03 2011 09:34 Insanious wrote:
On March 03 2011 09:22 L3gendary wrote:
Hope blizzard loses and fast.

if blizzard loses, then they have NO incentive to EVER produce another competitive game ever... or any other gaming company. No video game company will EVER try to make something that others can just take, and use, without paying them... this will KILL e-sports and will make the casual game even stronger...

Blizzard is spending money to try and turn SC2 into the new SC (yes I realize what I just said) with respect to e-sports. When they release SC3 or WC4 or some other RTS they will be trying to do the same thing.... since it makes money.

If they cannot milk and e-sport, they they won't make an e-sport... and then we can see blizzard simply transitioning out of making games like SC, and using the IP simply to make casual friendly games and end it there.

People need to realize, companies are in this business to make money, and this lawsuit basically says to companies:

"If Blizzard wins, we can make money off of e-sports, if Blizzard loses we do not make money off of e-sorts".

Blizzard needs to win this for the gaming community... sadly.

Blizzard would still have the exact same incentive to produce good games that people want to play (and maybe even watch others play) as they've always had.
Sales.
You make it sound like the only reason for a company to produce a game that millions of people play, love and base their dreams on is potential broadcasting fees. That's hardly the case.
And I'm certain it wasn't even a passing thought among neither executives nor developers during the creation of broodwar.

My point is that if there is a market for hard, competetive, "esports friendly" games one company or another will make money by tapping into that market. Even if laws allowed people to sell their replays, their own custom maps or broadcast the game on TV for money.

Not really

You make it sound like the only reason for a company to produce a game that millions of people play, love and base their dreams on is potential broadcasting fees. That's hardly the case.
And I'm certain it wasn't even a passing thought among neither executives nor developers during the creation of broodwar.



Doubt they expected BW to become as popular as it is today compared to back then.

Blizzard would still have the exact same incentive to produce good games that people want to play (and maybe even watch others play) as they've always had.
Sales.

You can have sales by making other games (i.e. casual/idle based games) and not esports. TBH it could even be a starcraft based game that's like farmville or some crap.... imagine maybe a zergling farm where you try to feed and care for zerglings for example ^^', it's not that hard to think of something like that.

My point is that if there is a market for hard, competetive, "esports friendly" games one company or another will make money by tapping into that market. Even if laws allowed people to sell their replays, their own custom maps or broadcast the game on TV for money.

Yes, but no...

If the people broadcasting the game on TV for money aren't respecting your Intellectual property, then there isn't a point in making the game, as tbh well, unless I guess you make the singleplayer only/or very good, then there wouldn't be much of a point in it, you can't make money "tapping" into a market that wants all the money for themselves (try going to for example, the general fansubbing community, where most of the people would just rather to download it or watch it for free rather than pay for it**)

I however disagree with Blizz about replays and custom maps however, as those have (for example) *my* intellectual "property" with it however. Making tournaments and broadcasting it, however isn't that person's intellectual property in any way.

**: This is of course, not talking about CR series, as CR makes it so you can watch it (legally) normally a few weeks after, for free. && the fact that those series usually has less people fansubbing it because there is usually not much of a point. Also I'm more of talking about the people who were into anime (via torrents, xdcc, illegal streams, whatever) until ~2010-2011, as the legal alternatives didn't get into the state it is right now (able to compete with fansubs) until then
Twitter: @zhurai | Site: http://zhurai.com
Yoshinaka
Profile Joined July 2010
New Zealand50 Posts
March 03 2011 21:42 GMT
#89
I remember a time when this topic was discussed on these forums and everyone took blizzards side, now you are starting to see the damage it is causing. Blizzard was just being plain greedy, trying to milk every undeserved penny they could get legally. Starcraft that we know it, would of been dead long ago if it wasnt for the korean broadcasting stations. Thumbs up to the Blizzard Fanboys
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 03 2011 21:44 GMT
#90
On March 04 2011 06:04 KlaCkoN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 03 2011 09:34 Insanious wrote:
On March 03 2011 09:22 L3gendary wrote:
Hope blizzard loses and fast.

if blizzard loses, then they have NO incentive to EVER produce another competitive game ever... or any other gaming company. No video game company will EVER try to make something that others can just take, and use, without paying them... this will KILL e-sports and will make the casual game even stronger...

Blizzard is spending money to try and turn SC2 into the new SC (yes I realize what I just said) with respect to e-sports. When they release SC3 or WC4 or some other RTS they will be trying to do the same thing.... since it makes money.

If they cannot milk and e-sport, they they won't make an e-sport... and then we can see blizzard simply transitioning out of making games like SC, and using the IP simply to make casual friendly games and end it there.

People need to realize, companies are in this business to make money, and this lawsuit basically says to companies:

"If Blizzard wins, we can make money off of e-sports, if Blizzard loses we do not make money off of e-sorts".

Blizzard needs to win this for the gaming community... sadly.

Blizzard would still have the exact same incentive to produce good games that people want to play (and maybe even watch others play) as they've always had.
Sales.
You make it sound like the only reason for a company to produce a game that millions of people play, love and base their dreams on is potential broadcasting fees. That's hardly the case.
And I'm certain it wasn't even a passing thought among neither executives nor developers during the creation of broodwar.

My point is that if there is a market for hard, competetive, "esports friendly" games one company or another will make money by tapping into that market. Even if laws allowed people to sell their replays, their own custom maps or broadcast the game on TV for money.


Except they don't have a real incentive to create a truly balanced game. They can simply pump out a Super Smash Bros Brawl quality of SC# or WC# and call it a day (fun, but balanced in the least). Only patching things that break the game. Complain all you want about the state of SC2 right now, but it's fairly balanced and that's because Blizzard has striven from the beginning to create a competitive game out of it.
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6274 Posts
March 03 2011 21:48 GMT
#91
I don't get why everyone keeps discussing it. It's all so subjective and it's actually quite ridiculous imo, we don't even have 1% of the information on what's actually going on in the OGN / MBC v Blizzard most of it is just assumptions people make and then use it as an argument.

It's just silly to discuss something you don't know a thing of and claiming things like Blizzard is trying to kill BW is just being ignorant and choosing the side of kespa. If Blizzard wanted to kill BW they would have ordered the injunction ( am I using the right word ) ages ago and there would have been no MSL / OSL atm.

Stop hating on blizzard and stop hating on Kespa theyre doing this for their own interest that's pretty much all we can conclude from this but what company / organization doesn't?
zhurai
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States5660 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-03 22:03:39
March 03 2011 22:03 GMT
#92
On March 04 2011 06:44 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2011 06:04 KlaCkoN wrote:
On March 03 2011 09:34 Insanious wrote:
On March 03 2011 09:22 L3gendary wrote:
Hope blizzard loses and fast.

if blizzard loses, then they have NO incentive to EVER produce another competitive game ever... or any other gaming company. No video game company will EVER try to make something that others can just take, and use, without paying them... this will KILL e-sports and will make the casual game even stronger...

Blizzard is spending money to try and turn SC2 into the new SC (yes I realize what I just said) with respect to e-sports. When they release SC3 or WC4 or some other RTS they will be trying to do the same thing.... since it makes money.

If they cannot milk and e-sport, they they won't make an e-sport... and then we can see blizzard simply transitioning out of making games like SC, and using the IP simply to make casual friendly games and end it there.

People need to realize, companies are in this business to make money, and this lawsuit basically says to companies:

"If Blizzard wins, we can make money off of e-sports, if Blizzard loses we do not make money off of e-sorts".

Blizzard needs to win this for the gaming community... sadly.

Blizzard would still have the exact same incentive to produce good games that people want to play (and maybe even watch others play) as they've always had.
Sales.
You make it sound like the only reason for a company to produce a game that millions of people play, love and base their dreams on is potential broadcasting fees. That's hardly the case.
And I'm certain it wasn't even a passing thought among neither executives nor developers during the creation of broodwar.

My point is that if there is a market for hard, competetive, "esports friendly" games one company or another will make money by tapping into that market. Even if laws allowed people to sell their replays, their own custom maps or broadcast the game on TV for money.


Except they don't have a real incentive to create a truly balanced game. They can simply pump out a Super Smash Bros Brawl quality of SC# or WC# and call it a day (fun, but balanced in the least). Only patching things that break the game. Complain all you want about the state of SC2 right now, but it's fairly balanced and that's because Blizzard has striven from the beginning to create a competitive game out of it.

or like I said in my above post..... zergling farm !! ._. (which I admit'll be amusing, but not something I'd want for starcraft...)
Twitter: @zhurai | Site: http://zhurai.com
BreakerD
Profile Joined March 2010
United States159 Posts
March 03 2011 22:03 GMT
#93
On March 03 2011 09:34 Insanious wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 03 2011 09:22 L3gendary wrote:
Hope blizzard loses and fast.

if blizzard loses, then they have NO incentive to EVER produce another competitive game ever... or any other gaming company. No video game company will EVER try to make something that others can just take, and use, without paying them... this will KILL e-sports and will make the casual game even stronger...

Blizzard is spending money to try and turn SC2 into the new SC (yes I realize what I just said) with respect to e-sports. When they release SC3 or WC4 or some other RTS they will be trying to do the same thing.... since it makes money.

If they cannot milk and e-sport, they they won't make an e-sport... and then we can see blizzard simply transitioning out of making games like SC, and using the IP simply to make casual friendly games and end it there.

People need to realize, companies are in this business to make money, and this lawsuit basically says to companies:

"If Blizzard wins, we can make money off of e-sports, if Blizzard loses we do not make money off of e-sorts".

Blizzard needs to win this for the gaming community... sadly.

Wow where did u get ur logic from? If blizzard was to lose and stop producing games, other gaming corporation would be throwing a party for they know they can produce a similar game and make money.

From how I see it, If people are to stream sc2 tournaments (outside of GSL) on justin.tv, ustream, or any other stream, shouldnt they pay for broadcasting rights?
zhurai
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States5660 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-03 22:07:59
March 03 2011 22:06 GMT
#94
On March 04 2011 07:03 BreakerD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 03 2011 09:34 Insanious wrote:
On March 03 2011 09:22 L3gendary wrote:
Hope blizzard loses and fast.

if blizzard loses, then they have NO incentive to EVER produce another competitive game ever... or any other gaming company. No video game company will EVER try to make something that others can just take, and use, without paying them... this will KILL e-sports and will make the casual game even stronger...

Blizzard is spending money to try and turn SC2 into the new SC (yes I realize what I just said) with respect to e-sports. When they release SC3 or WC4 or some other RTS they will be trying to do the same thing.... since it makes money.

If they cannot milk and e-sport, they they won't make an e-sport... and then we can see blizzard simply transitioning out of making games like SC, and using the IP simply to make casual friendly games and end it there.

People need to realize, companies are in this business to make money, and this lawsuit basically says to companies:

"If Blizzard wins, we can make money off of e-sports, if Blizzard loses we do not make money off of e-sorts".

Blizzard needs to win this for the gaming community... sadly.

Wow where did u get ur logic from? If blizzard was to lose and stop producing games, other gaming corporation would be throwing a party for they know they can produce a similar game and make money.

From how I see it, If people are to stream sc2 tournaments (outside of GSL) on justin.tv, ustream, or any other stream, shouldnt they pay for broadcasting rights?


Competitive Game != Games in general

He's saying that they won't make competitive games, and can make any other type of game: idle, puzzle, etc.**

And I doubt other companies can produce a "similar" game as that has been already tried (Age of *, TA, Civilizations, whatever)... doesn't mean it can become an esport/competitive sport (just an RTS)....

From how I see it, If people are to stream sc2 tournaments (outside of GSL) on justin.tv, ustream, or any other stream, shouldnt they pay for broadcasting rights?

most people stream practice games/ladder games, which aren't tournaments for one
the ones that do, have to legally tell blizzard (using their tournament form) to tell them.

I don't know ofc if they did, but that's legally what they have to do, and if they don't, they can be shut down legally at any time.

**: Yes you can make money off of those.... Please see Farmville@Zynga which is apparently soon going to surpass activision sometime.........
Twitter: @zhurai | Site: http://zhurai.com
Copymizer
Profile Joined November 2010
Denmark2107 Posts
March 03 2011 22:14 GMT
#95
fix your shit Blizzard, sooner or later, this sucks ! I guess the e-sports players and spectators are dissapointed with this tho.
~~Yo man ! MBCGame HERO Fighting !! Holy check !
DarkRise
Profile Joined November 2010
1644 Posts
March 03 2011 22:21 GMT
#96
A tournament without blizzard games, well GL with losing 50% participant/audience/viewers
Sc2 is growing at an incredible pace and do you think this will harm Blizzard at all?
Talack
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada2742 Posts
March 03 2011 22:37 GMT
#97
Blizzard wins this one still.

What are they thinking. You think sponsors want to dump money into a tournament that's only CS? lol. War3/SC/BW/Sc2/WoW(to a small extent common) are incredibly big around the world. Eliminating those takes out pretty much all games from esports.
biskit
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia355 Posts
March 03 2011 22:54 GMT
#98
Only CS tournament... lol.
MaYuu
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Sweden516 Posts
March 03 2011 23:04 GMT
#99
God bless the creators of Minecraft. They are not in it for the money but the sake of making an epic game. When they were asked why they don't wanna make a sequel to Minecraft or an expansion they said "We're not in it to make money, tho the money from Minecraft will help us make a new game with more possibilities"
ehh`?
Xxavi
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1248 Posts
March 04 2011 04:30 GMT
#100
Now, I can see why Blizzard wants money out of this.

But I can see why these companies do not want to pay to Blizzard as well. These companies essentially popularized and advertised Blizzard products, and that's part of the reason why so many of copies of those have been sold. I don't think EA Sports would charge a cent, if, say a Korean TV, asked to make a competitive game out of it and broadcast it on TV. That's free advertising.

Blizzard is being ridiculous on so many points. But still, it's their right to dictate the conditions of use for their own product. Eventually though, it might not help them. If another company dares to come up with a good RTS game, and agrees for free advertising through competitive gaming, Blizzard will be quick to rethink their position.

This is like that Sony technology vs VHS technology battle or more recently, BluRay vs HDTV (or whatever) format battle. The side which showed less flexibility and wanted more control lost. As we know, Sony's technology was better than VHS, but Sony wanted to control everything and wanted money out of everything, everybody to ask permission etc. The world just went for VHS, and Sony was left empty-handed.

I hope another company dares to make a decent RTS game, I will be glad to laugh at the Blizzard idiots for their greed.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
00:00
#81 (TLMC 22 Edition)
PiGStarcraft451
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft451
CosmosSc2 46
RuFF_SC2 33
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 6086
Artosis 630
Dota 2
monkeys_forever709
NeuroSwarm106
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m4331
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox608
AZ_Axe103
Other Games
summit1g9793
Day[9].tv898
shahzam791
C9.Mang0490
Maynarde89
UpATreeSC66
ViBE43
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick711
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 77
• davetesta50
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1805
• Day9tv898
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 57m
Replay Cast
22h 57m
The PondCast
1d 8h
OSC
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
RSL Revival
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
4 days
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-12
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W7
YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.