• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:21
CEST 08:21
KST 15:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202548RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support! BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 709 users

Morrow and Sjow Matchfixing? - Page 34

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 32 33 34 35 36 49 Next All
Telcontar
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom16710 Posts
December 22 2010 13:15 GMT
#661
I guess this just comes down to fundamental differences in how we view competition and professional sports. If you think it's alright for a tournament system to be abused because there are some holes, i guess you are of the pragmatist sort. If you think doing so will tarnish the spirit of competition and professionalism, i guess you are more of an idealist. Either way there's no absolute right and wrong, just different views. My point is, arguing about which is right will get us no where. It's just better to agree to disagree and part ways amicably.
Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta.
Askesis
Profile Joined September 2010
216 Posts
December 22 2010 13:16 GMT
#662
On December 22 2010 22:10 Cor Aut Mors wrote:
they dont feel like they were doing anything wrong, imo the only reason they vaguely tried to hide it is cause they knew idiots would go on self righteous rants concerning a non-issue

the jobs of these players is to maximize their profits through their profession
they tried to think of the optimal way of doing this, questioned the officials as to the legality of the theoretical situation, then acted according to the answer

there was no matchfixing, when told it was an illegal move one of them stepped out of the tournament as it would be pointless to spend his work time in a profitless endeavor

the only reason the officials themselves are condemning the players is to give rise to the scandal, gain approval in the community, and gain a ton of free publicity
I doubt they were originally going to punish the players for asking a question

How do you have so much inside information on this situation?

How do you you know exactly what happened, how they and the tournament staff got in contact about this situation, and the opinions of the players and the tournament staff?
Shikyo
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Finland33997 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 13:18:55
December 22 2010 13:18 GMT
#663
On December 22 2010 22:07 sleepingdog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 22:02 Shikyo wrote:
In SSBM back when I played competitively, I've split prices with the other finalist like 4 times without actually playing the finals. I think it's really nice and no one really loses anything, it's like having 2 winners.


This thread really brings out the worst out of people

Again to everybody out there:

This is NOT....repeat this is NOT about splitting up the prize-money of a SINGLE event. The tournament host decided to give away a computer in case somebody manages to win 11 times out of 18. The tournament host OWNS the frickin computer it is his choice to either give it away or not. Now he decided to give it to a person who manages to WIN 11 tournaments. It's not like the winner of a single event gets 10 grand the loser nothing and both decide to split it up.
It's amazing how people manage to not understand this very simple thing.

Civilized societies have a word for this: fraud.

Huh? Worst out of people?

If the tournament system is so incredibly stupid that one person needs to win multiple tournaments, and even with a half-half split no one wins anything, it makes perfect sense that when both you and your friend make it to the finals, you'll let the same person win every time. I don't think there's anything wrong with that(assuming no coverage), and it wouldn't be a big deal in most other competitive games. SC scene just overreacts to this stuff, to me it's perfectly logical.
League of Legends EU West, Platinum III | Yousei Teikoku is the best thing that has ever happened to music.
TotalBiscuit
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United Kingdom5437 Posts
December 22 2010 13:18 GMT
#664
I'm going to leave one post on this and one alone.

This kind of bullshit harms the reputation of eSports and sets the cause of getting it taken seriously by sponsors, spectators and the world as a whole back.

This same thing happened at the i41 finals. The two finalists agreed to split the pot, went random, played lazy games because there was no competitive drive there and made a mockery of the tournament. They did this for £5000, a larger prize than this laptop. The fact that there was not more of a stink thrown about it is ridiculous. There is a reason prizes are tiered, to ensure there is a strong incentive to play to the best of your ability in order to win the larger prize.

If you are not willing to play in the spirit of the tournament, do not play at all. I personally find this behaviour extremely distasteful and harmful to the scene as a whole. The fact that people are siding with the players on this issue rather than the sponsors just goes to show how little people really understand about the synergy between sponsors and players, required to create a successful eSports scene. The behaviour of both players is deplorable, particularly in the language they used, it is embarrassing. It is good that one of them stepped out of the tournament but the fact that some people don't see the problem with this behaviour is mindboggling and shows a fairly clear bias towards the players, which has no rational basis.
CommentatorHost of SHOUTcraft Clan Wars- http://www.mlg.tv/shoutcraft
Cor Aut Mors
Profile Joined December 2010
United States6 Posts
December 22 2010 13:18 GMT
#665
I don't get it. So basically, if Morrow lost to Sjow, he wouldn't get the PC. That's why Sjow isn't participating? What would Sjow lose if he won the tourney lol ? Or did Morrow 'pay' Sjow with his other prizes so Sjow wouldn't participate?


basically, if they both play, neither can win
if one plays, he will win big
and if neither plays, no one wins again
the basic prisoners dilemma

so they tried to think of a way around it, so that both can profit and compete, were told no
so sjowe just left, knowing it wouldnt profit him to play with morrow competing
and now both are being flamed for it
Confirmed by Mythbusters
genai
Profile Joined July 2009
Croatia78 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 13:24:07
December 22 2010 13:19 GMT
#666
On December 22 2010 22:06 Sewi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 22:00 cilinder007 wrote:
On December 22 2010 21:56 Sewi wrote:
One thing that hasnt been pointed out enough imo is that it is unfair to the sponsors/organizers.

The rule says that the comp is given awy only if one player wins 11 finals. If not, no computer is given away. So matchfixing takes away the option that there is no computer to be given to any player.In a fair competition, the two finalists should try hard to win 11 final games, which is not easy.
Matchfixing in this case ruins the whole thought behind the tournaments system.
It is NOT the same as if there was a single finals with fixed price money, which both of them agree to share after the finals.


My oppinion about the actual two players:
I dont like that they think about doing something like this. And I dont think it makes them look smart when they discuss this while being on stream. Personally I think both should be banned from this specific tournament, now that it is all public.



so because the touranment organisers didnt put a rule that this isnt alowed, they should be 'fair' enough to play for real and not get a computer just to please some people who think that they are the moral police and settle for a lesser prize while they can get a bigger and better prize without braking any rules ?


Do you really think that?
Would be interesting to know if any major tournament like MLG, IEM, GSL has something like "no matchfixing allowed" written in their rules.
Seriously, it is just disrespectful to do something like that. And imo it is kinda obvious that matchfixing is NOT allowed at ANY tournament.


yet it is in many other games, sports and tournaments? how is it so obviosly not allowed in sc? sure i understand if you are nr1 for sure, and if you lose your friend will be nr2 and you will both go thru the group, and some 3rd guy wont have a chance to go thru... but if my friend beat some guy, i beat some guy, we meet knockout phase, why cant i forfeit the game at MY OWN expanse to help some other player? if the tournament dragged on and i dont have time, i can forfeit and let someone go thru AT MY own expanse and clearly within the rules!
how and why is that bad? i just dont get it... is there some higher unwritten god given rule where you are not allowed to do something that wont hurt anyone but yourself, and will actually help someone else???

and plz dont say i will hurt sponsors and tournament organisers, cause its just not thru... they created and allowed me to do so by putting themselves into lose-lose situation! if i go within the rules and let someone else win, they lose because they have to give the computer... yet if i decide not to participate, because participating will only hurt myself and my friend, they lose one big name in the tournament! its not profesionals duty to satisfy organisers and sponsors... they will usualy do whats best for them and within the rules! its on organiser to make sure to make rules that put both them and pro into win-win situation, so pros will come and organiers will profit from that, not to make rules to either turn away pros or lose more money on prizes and for pro is either lose money on prize or not play at all... retarded organisers and retarded people who blame pros for trying to be pro and maximise their gain in legal way
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 13:20:20
December 22 2010 13:20 GMT
#667
On December 22 2010 22:18 Shikyo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 22:07 sleepingdog wrote:
On December 22 2010 22:02 Shikyo wrote:
In SSBM back when I played competitively, I've split prices with the other finalist like 4 times without actually playing the finals. I think it's really nice and no one really loses anything, it's like having 2 winners.


This thread really brings out the worst out of people

Again to everybody out there:

This is NOT....repeat this is NOT about splitting up the prize-money of a SINGLE event. The tournament host decided to give away a computer in case somebody manages to win 11 times out of 18. The tournament host OWNS the frickin computer it is his choice to either give it away or not. Now he decided to give it to a person who manages to WIN 11 tournaments. It's not like the winner of a single event gets 10 grand the loser nothing and both decide to split it up.
It's amazing how people manage to not understand this very simple thing.

Civilized societies have a word for this: fraud.

Huh? Worst out of people?

If the tournament system is so incredibly stupid that one person needs to win multiple tournaments, it makes perfect sense that when both you and your friend make it to the finals, you'll let the same person win every time. I don't think there's anything wrong with that(assuming no coverage), and it wouldn't be a big deal in most other competitive games. SC scene just overreacts to this stuff, to me it's perfectly logical.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAAF_Golden_League#Jackpot_winners

Now go ahead and call the IAAF "incredibly stupid" for making a system where one person that wins multiple events gets a special jackpot.
Would be perfectly ok if the best athletes agreed to let one win all the events and split up the big pot afterwards, wouldn't it?
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
ParasitJonte
Profile Joined September 2004
Sweden1768 Posts
December 22 2010 13:20 GMT
#668
On December 22 2010 21:53 hypercube wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 21:43 ParasitJonte wrote:

Yeah. That's exactly what I want you to do. To realize that from a moral standpoint what they're doing now isn't any different.


It is different. Actually, it's so different that if you don't see it yourself it's impossible to explain the difference. Mostly because the implication is that you don't want to see it.


Don't know what that is meant to imply. But I don't care about these two players at all. I mean, I have no bias toward them; I don't know them or anything. This is just my opinion.

They're still colluding, cooperating, helping eachother in order to maximize their profits. They're just doing it using a kind of loophole. And there are several such loopholes that could be used. The other one being that one player only plays in 7 tournaments and leave the rest to the other player. That would actually be the best idea because then they would get all the other prizes as well. Now they will just get a computer.

If you can't put the difference into words then why should I listen to you?
Hello=)
aristarchus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States652 Posts
December 22 2010 13:20 GMT
#669
On December 22 2010 22:10 noD wrote:
The title and op is misleading, that is why people that generally don´t read anything are raging
It should be something like 'Morrow and Sjow agreed with forfeiting their matches so they split prizes'


Who's the one who doesn't read anything? They aren't splitting a prize they would collectively win anyway. They're talking about fixing things so that they can get a special bonus prize that the tournament only wanted to give out if someone was able to beat everyone else consistently. They also aren't forfeiting. The fact that they're worried about whether what they're saying can be read on the stream makes it pretty clear that they weren't going to be upfront and refuse to play the games - they were just going to pretend the same person always won. The thread title is totally accurate.
IcyPringle
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada210 Posts
December 22 2010 13:22 GMT
#670
Funny how this suprises everyone. One reason why I never full respected Morrow is that he's just a Combat-Ex in disguise.

Fixed games/free wins in BW. Why should SC2 be any different?

I feel ashamed by both these players actions no matter the reason or "excuses" they have. Fixing anything, for any reason no matter the benefit, is wrong and should no be tolerated at all.

lol at Morrow not turning off his stream...guess hes hurting for views or something...
SC2: IcyPringle.137 - Terran
Shikyo
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Finland33997 Posts
December 22 2010 13:23 GMT
#671
On December 22 2010 22:20 sleepingdog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 22:18 Shikyo wrote:
On December 22 2010 22:07 sleepingdog wrote:
On December 22 2010 22:02 Shikyo wrote:
In SSBM back when I played competitively, I've split prices with the other finalist like 4 times without actually playing the finals. I think it's really nice and no one really loses anything, it's like having 2 winners.


This thread really brings out the worst out of people

Again to everybody out there:

This is NOT....repeat this is NOT about splitting up the prize-money of a SINGLE event. The tournament host decided to give away a computer in case somebody manages to win 11 times out of 18. The tournament host OWNS the frickin computer it is his choice to either give it away or not. Now he decided to give it to a person who manages to WIN 11 tournaments. It's not like the winner of a single event gets 10 grand the loser nothing and both decide to split it up.
It's amazing how people manage to not understand this very simple thing.

Civilized societies have a word for this: fraud.

Huh? Worst out of people?

If the tournament system is so incredibly stupid that one person needs to win multiple tournaments, it makes perfect sense that when both you and your friend make it to the finals, you'll let the same person win every time. I don't think there's anything wrong with that(assuming no coverage), and it wouldn't be a big deal in most other competitive games. SC scene just overreacts to this stuff, to me it's perfectly logical.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAAF_Golden_League#Jackpot_winners

Now go ahead and call the IAAF "incredibly stupid" for making a system where one person that wins multiple events gets a special jackpot.
Would be perfectly ok if the best athletes agreed to let one win all the events and split up the big pot afterwards, wouldn't it?

No, because there's coverage. I think I covered this... If there's some sort of coverage you can't do these kinds of things for obvious reasons. If there is a stream or something similiar of the tournament, then feel free to ignore all my posts because coverage makes it so that you shouldn't do these kind of things.
League of Legends EU West, Platinum III | Yousei Teikoku is the best thing that has ever happened to music.
Cor Aut Mors
Profile Joined December 2010
United States6 Posts
December 22 2010 13:23 GMT
#672
How do you have so much inside information on this situation?

How do you you know exactly what happened, how they and the tournament staff got in contact about this situation, and the opinions of the players and the tournament staff?


your right I dont and some is specualtion
but is has been stated on here earlier that the players did approach the officials prior to the tournament regarding their plan
and, we were shown that sjowe did not see anything wrong with what they were trying to do

and that, originally, on WoW the official of the tournament didnt completely disregard the idea and didnt call for immediate banishment

ya the feelings of each are specualtions by me, but based on the information given, it seems pretty accurate
Confirmed by Mythbusters
Zim23
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1681 Posts
December 22 2010 13:24 GMT
#673
This is wrong on so many levels. The bottom line is a competitor should always be competing. Always. This isn't a profession people should be choosing to make money, this is a profession for people who love competing, and want to always give the best performance possible. If you're in this only to make money then you're in the wrong field.
Do an arranged marriage if she's not completely minging, and don't worry about dancing, get a go-kart, cheers.
Lobotomist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1541 Posts
December 22 2010 13:26 GMT
#674
Ugh. Well, Morrow and Sjow are blackened by this whole shenanigain. I understand the whole "the tournament was set up poorly" argument, but it's still definitely cheating.
Teching to hive too quickly isn't just a risk: it's an ultrarisk
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 13:27:08
December 22 2010 13:26 GMT
#675
On December 22 2010 22:23 Shikyo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 22:20 sleepingdog wrote:
On December 22 2010 22:18 Shikyo wrote:
On December 22 2010 22:07 sleepingdog wrote:
On December 22 2010 22:02 Shikyo wrote:
In SSBM back when I played competitively, I've split prices with the other finalist like 4 times without actually playing the finals. I think it's really nice and no one really loses anything, it's like having 2 winners.


This thread really brings out the worst out of people

Again to everybody out there:

This is NOT....repeat this is NOT about splitting up the prize-money of a SINGLE event. The tournament host decided to give away a computer in case somebody manages to win 11 times out of 18. The tournament host OWNS the frickin computer it is his choice to either give it away or not. Now he decided to give it to a person who manages to WIN 11 tournaments. It's not like the winner of a single event gets 10 grand the loser nothing and both decide to split it up.
It's amazing how people manage to not understand this very simple thing.

Civilized societies have a word for this: fraud.

Huh? Worst out of people?

If the tournament system is so incredibly stupid that one person needs to win multiple tournaments, it makes perfect sense that when both you and your friend make it to the finals, you'll let the same person win every time. I don't think there's anything wrong with that(assuming no coverage), and it wouldn't be a big deal in most other competitive games. SC scene just overreacts to this stuff, to me it's perfectly logical.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAAF_Golden_League#Jackpot_winners

Now go ahead and call the IAAF "incredibly stupid" for making a system where one person that wins multiple events gets a special jackpot.
Would be perfectly ok if the best athletes agreed to let one win all the events and split up the big pot afterwards, wouldn't it?

No, because there's coverage. I think I covered this... If there's some sort of coverage you can't do these kinds of things for obvious reasons. If there is a stream or something similiar of the tournament, then feel free to ignore all my posts because coverage makes it so that you shouldn't do these kind of things.


This is ridiculous.

Why on earth do you think are you "allowed" to scam a sponsor just because nobody watches? It's the money of the tournament host/sponsor (his frickin property), he can decide how he wants to give it away, or if at all. If he wants to make absurd rules, fine, it's his money, he can do whatever he wants with it. If he states that the special jackpot goes to the player who wins most games by 6-pooling, it's his damn right. You, on the other hand, are not forced to participate if you don't like it.

Audience has nothing to do with this...like...at all.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
LittLeD
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden7973 Posts
December 22 2010 13:26 GMT
#676
Im shocked and ashamed.
This is not good people, not good...
☆Grubby ☆| Tod|DeMusliM|ThorZaiN|SaSe|Moon|Mana| ☆HerO ☆
DND_Enkil
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden598 Posts
December 22 2010 13:26 GMT
#677
the only reason the officials themselves are condemning the players is to give rise to the scandal, gain approval in the community, and gain a ton of free publicity
I doubt they were originally going to punish the players for asking a question


Just want to point out that as far as i know the officials have not in any way condemed they players. The owner Budak made a statement that matchfixing was not allowed and players doing it would get banned when asked about it by Rakaka.se but he did not say anything at all about MoRRoW os Sjow. More like he was clarifying the rules for everyone.
"If you write about a sewing needle there is always some one-eyed bastard that gets offended" - Fritiof The Pirate Nilsson
Askesis
Profile Joined September 2010
216 Posts
December 22 2010 13:28 GMT
#678
On December 22 2010 22:18 TotalBiscuit wrote:
I'm going to leave one post on this and one alone.

This kind of bullshit harms the reputation of eSports and sets the cause of getting it taken seriously by sponsors, spectators and the world as a whole back.

This same thing happened at the i41 finals. The two finalists agreed to split the pot, went random, played lazy games because there was no competitive drive there and made a mockery of the tournament. They did this for £5000, a larger prize than this laptop. The fact that there was not more of a stink thrown about it is ridiculous. There is a reason prizes are tiered, to ensure there is a strong incentive to play to the best of your ability in order to win the larger prize.

If you are not willing to play in the spirit of the tournament, do not play at all. I personally find this behaviour extremely distasteful and harmful to the scene as a whole. The fact that people are siding with the players on this issue rather than the sponsors just goes to show how little people really understand about the synergy between sponsors and players, required to create a successful eSports scene. The behaviour of both players is deplorable, particularly in the language they used, it is embarrassing. It is good that one of them stepped out of the tournament but the fact that some people don't see the problem with this behaviour is mindboggling and shows a fairly clear bias towards the players, which has no rational basis.

Well put. The thing that really gets to me is how so many of the people in the thread are siding with the players. Perhaps it's just the early sample size, but the proportion is alarming so far.
Cor Aut Mors
Profile Joined December 2010
United States6 Posts
December 22 2010 13:29 GMT
#679

Just want to point out that as far as i know the officials have not in any way condemed they players. The owner Budak made a statement that matchfixing was not allowed and players doing it would get banned when asked about it by Rakaka.se but he did not say anything at all about MoRRoW os Sjow. More like he was clarifying the rules for everyone.


mmkay im wrong about that, jumped the gun a little
Confirmed by Mythbusters
VoirDire
Profile Joined February 2009
Sweden1923 Posts
December 22 2010 13:31 GMT
#680
On December 22 2010 22:26 DND_Enkil wrote:
Show nested quote +
the only reason the officials themselves are condemning the players is to give rise to the scandal, gain approval in the community, and gain a ton of free publicity
I doubt they were originally going to punish the players for asking a question


Just want to point out that as far as i know the officials have not in any way condemed they players. The owner Budak made a statement that matchfixing was not allowed and players doing it would get banned when asked about it by Rakaka.se but he did not say anything at all about MoRRoW os Sjow. More like he was clarifying the rules for everyone.

Rakaka.se interpreted Budaks statement with:

Sjorrow-gate!
They may get banned for life.
EXTRA! Sjorrow-gate is condemned by Anton Budak.
Prev 1 32 33 34 35 36 49 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 39m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft612
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1260
Leta 512
Zeus 187
Noble 56
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Britney 0
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K925
Other Games
summit1g10886
SortOf31
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1367
BasetradeTV49
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 63
• Sammyuel 21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2303
• Stunt992
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
3h 39m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 4h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.