EPThey man, at least they are listening to us, and they will fix whatever is wrong in due time.
also, chat channels had a limit in BW and noone complained about that.
Chat Channels - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Terrifyer
United States338 Posts
hey man, at least they are listening to us, and they will fix whatever is wrong in due time. also, chat channels had a limit in BW and noone complained about that. | ||
|
Bluetea
United States185 Posts
| ||
|
Atlas_550
United States180 Posts
On December 04 2010 17:29 Bluetea wrote: I can't believe how big of a fail these chat channels are. Private chat channels already exists in battle.net 1.1. In 1.2, they are the same exact thing plus a shitty "slow mode" that makes communication impossible. This is the biggest letdown ever. except you can have 100 people instead of 15..... | ||
|
Bluetea
United States185 Posts
| ||
|
Ighox
Norway580 Posts
On December 04 2010 17:43 Bluetea wrote: But there's a goddamn slow mode. It's unbearable. At first I was really happy that chat channels were finally here, logged on PTR to try it out and got turned around quite fast. The chat channels are so poorly implemented in their current state that I'm fairly sure it's just a trolling attempt from Blizzard, even if we disregard the fact that we've waited like a year for it and imagine they've spent five days working on it, I'd still call it underwhelming :p | ||
|
ALPINA
3791 Posts
 | ||
|
sOvrn
United States678 Posts
Battle.net was lacking these chat channels so bad!! SC2 for me has been such a lonely experience so far and I'm really glad that the chat channels have finally arrived. Although what's up with the limit on messages in a private party?? I know they're worried about spam, but c'mon that's just ridiculous. | ||
|
Jsanko
Slovakia120 Posts
 | ||
|
Weavel
Finland9221 Posts
| ||
|
Valhalla44
Bosnia-Herzegovina983 Posts
On December 04 2010 18:45 Weavel wrote: What does this ''slow-mode'' do? I guess it's something to prevent spamming or? Its for blocking spammers.Like u type 2 much in chat channel and it blocks u for some time from typing. EDIT: Does EU server have PTR on yet?. | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5652 Posts
On December 04 2010 17:17 Terrifyer wrote: I am amused that everybody is still complaining like how blizzard sucks since they didnt do it "perfectly." hey man, at least they are listening to us, and they will fix whatever is wrong in due time. also, chat channels had a limit in BW and noone complained about that. YAY! They're listening! It only took them almost a year. ;p Are those channels any different from the WC3 ones? They claimed their new chat system to be revolutionary and said they won't release it until it's much better than the previous incarnation from WC3. So is it any better? Is it even at least as good as chat channels in Age of series or HoN? | ||
|
Chicane
United States7875 Posts
Nevertheless, I do understand there are some situations where it might be necessary such as a popular private channel... perhaps one called "Team Liquid" where spammers may roam free, or simply if you don't want to have to remove an annoying friend who can't stop joining your channel when you are talking to someone, but overall... it's not TOO bad. It's a shame they can't just cover all the bases when working on Bnet 2.0, but I guess this is a step in the right direction. On a side note, if you have used the channels are the windows as small as shown in the patch notes thread? They were about the size of two chat boxes... which is ridiculously small as I was hoping to have a tab at the top left corner (similar to how you click on multiplayer) to go to a chat section, as well as have support on the bottom bar if desired. If they are that small, can they be maximized? Regardless of the answer to that, why do they always insist on making such large portraits for SC2 when they clearly make the interface far too cluttered. The custom game lobby is already bad enough. Overall I am happy, but I am sure I will find some disappointing things because the best and brightest at Blizzard can't use common sense and make an intuitive interface. | ||
|
ciaNo
Italy123 Posts
| ||
|
RoyalCheese
Czech Republic745 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/2999/ccc2.png) | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9030 Posts
| ||
|
ciaNo
Italy123 Posts
| ||
|
Dr. ROCKZO
New Zealand396 Posts
I'll definitely be doing it tomorrow. See you there guys. | ||
|
FarbrorAbavna
Sweden4856 Posts
On December 04 2010 16:59 SiguR wrote: Its a little irksome that it's 2010 and ~6 months after release and the chat system we're getting is still flawed in so many ways that have been pointed out in this thread. It's a little irksome that people dont seem to get the whole purpose with testing and the current state of chat channels is probably not what we'll end up with(since it's a test to see what works and what doesnt). | ||
|
ZeR
Australia15 Posts
| ||
|
RoyalCheese
Czech Republic745 Posts
On December 04 2010 19:16 ZeR wrote: i hope they have larger chat channels which cover the whole screen like wc3 in the future, giving it a kind of 'lobby' feeling. im pretty sure you can resize the window to cover almots whole screen | ||
| ||
