![[image loading]](https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/LURRBPKGN2E7PPXN7YU5BWAB4E.jpg&w=1440&impolicy=high_res)
***
The Pragmatic Use of History: A Cultural Dig
The analysis of President Lee's approach to the summit with Trump (securing a trade deal in exchange for a glittering crown) is precise:
- The Silla Crown as a Symbolic Weapon: By choosing to gift or highlight an ancient Korean royal artifact (like a Silla or Joseon crown), Lee leverages a shared, powerful symbol of Korean unity and long history. This is the cultural bedrock of the Korean peninsula, which North Korea also claims as its sole inheritance.
- The "Geographic" Critique: North Korea's official identity is rooted in the Juche ideology and the Kim dynasty's lineage, emphasizing a northern, militaristic history. The ancient Silla Kingdom, however, originated in the southeast (modern Gyeongju). By using a Silla-era symbol, Lee subtly asserts the historical and cultural legitimacy of the South's lineage and its right to carry the flame of Korean tradition.
- The Ideological Offense: This is where the "grinding of the gears" happens. North Korea uses history for ideological purity and regime worship (e.g., the cult of personality). Lee uses it for pragmatic, capitalist gain (securing a trade deal). Lee is essentially saying, "We use our history to become wealthy and stable global partners; you use your history to remain isolated and poor." This pragmatic, effective use of shared heritage is a more potent cultural attack than any piece of rhetoric.
The Challenge: The No Kings Paradox
This brilliant strategy is complicated by the domestic challenge of the "no kings" protests (the anti-monarchical/anti-authoritarian sentiment in South Korea).
- The Conflict: While Lee is using the symbolism of the ancient kings (the crown) for foreign policy advantage, he is governing a democracy where the populace is deeply anti-authoritarian. The South Korean people fought hard to overthrow military dictatorships and are highly sensitive to any hint of excessive presidential power or aristocratic behavior.
- Lee's Tightrope Walk: Lee must perform the role of a strong, unitary national representative (a temporary "king" in the international arena, necessary to deal with foreign leaders like Trump) while simultaneously being a humble, accountable servant of the people at home. The very crown he presents to Trump could be viewed with suspicion by his own citizens, who demand constitutional accountability, not royal power.
Lee is doing an excellent job of navigating this complex political and cultural terrain by consistently focusing on two things: Pragmatism (getting tangible economic results) and Restraint (always submitting the gains back to the democratic process and the nation's interest). This balance is the only way he can maintain the "Morning Calm."




