EPTI think we should start the 100 6-pool challenge next.
The 100 Four Gate Challenge - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Reason.SC2
Canada1047 Posts
I think we should start the 100 6-pool challenge next. | ||
|
kaztah
Norway1221 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Mahavishnu
Canada396 Posts
| ||
|
FetTerBender
Germany1393 Posts
I play random, so i would have to do ~300 games of which i will be doing my P games 4 Gate, does it count? :D Just have to remember to do 4gates all the time when playing P and get my fun out of the other matchups that i play. | ||
|
Mahavishnu
Canada396 Posts
| ||
|
haegN
Norway533 Posts
On November 24 2010 17:32 Telcontar wrote: Where is the reward that comes with the challenge? The reward is cheese | ||
|
dudeman001
United States2412 Posts
| ||
|
Mahavishnu
Canada396 Posts
| ||
|
WarSong
Canada126 Posts
O_o | ||
|
jcroisdale
United States1543 Posts
| ||
|
hugedong
United States510 Posts
Maybe if this was a 15 nexus for 100 games it would actually be beneficial to someone's play and not be the most boring thing you have ever done. | ||
|
beef42
Denmark1037 Posts
On November 24 2010 18:06 hugedong wrote: Out of all the pointless posts I've read on this site, this one takes the cake as the worst thread I have ever seen. The only thing it will do is get every bronze player to diamond in a few games, and absolutely suck after they try any other strategy. Maybe if this was a 15 nexus for 100 games it would actually be beneficial to someone's play and not be the most boring thing you have ever done. Please stop this build snobbery. First of all, 15nexusing anywhere other than PvZ is instant lose. Secondly, if 4gate wins games, why is it a bad build? Why are only macro builds "beneficial to someone's play"? | ||
|
s4m222
United States272 Posts
| ||
|
Powster
United States650 Posts
Anyway.. I think I will do it because.. I havent played much in a month and didnt plan on playing till protoss buff.. so might as well practice 4 gating which I never did since I am a macro protoss player... Not starting right now though.. maybe like in 2 days.. I got loads of points in my bonus pool.. and my rating is way below my skill due to inflation and lack of practice so will be a while before I am even playing equal ppl.. Although probably wont matter since I doubt pure 4 gate will actually get there.. will post that info junk when I decide to start.. | ||
|
Sniffy
Australia290 Posts
On November 24 2010 18:11 beef42 wrote: Please stop this build snobbery. First of all, 15nexusing anywhere other than PvZ is instant lose. Secondly, if 4gate wins games, why is it a bad build? Why are only macro builds "beneficial to someone's play"? Because 4gate stops working as often the higher you go and is so simple you learn nothing. I can't tell you how many times I've held off a 4gate only to have my opponent just quit the game before I've even countered. It's hilarious and sad. I could provide you with a replay of a 1800 Diamond Protoss 4gating me on Jungle Basin and quitting as soon as I destroyed his push. He even faked a FE to try and put me off, I only saw his 4gate because I sac'd an OL 30 seconds after my drone died. Basically, 4gate doesn't teach you anything. This guy obviously had no idea how to play past the first push. | ||
|
haegN
Norway533 Posts
On November 24 2010 18:11 beef42 wrote: Please stop this build snobbery. First of all, 15nexusing anywhere other than PvZ is instant lose. Secondly, if 4gate wins games, why is it a bad build? Why are only macro builds "beneficial to someone's play"? I agree, people saying you dont learn a lot from 4 gating is wrong, you definately learn to micro! Its a good build for having quick micro battles. | ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
On November 24 2010 18:06 hugedong wrote: Out of all the pointless posts I've read on this site, this one takes the cake as the worst thread I have ever seen. The only thing it will do is get every bronze player to diamond in a few games, and absolutely suck after they try any other strategy. Maybe if this was a 15 nexus for 100 games it would actually be beneficial to someone's play and not be the most boring thing you have ever done. Said like a true bronze player. The 4 gate=autowin is a stupid myth made up by sub-par players who think they can be 2k diamond protoss if they spam this 1 magical build but simply refuse to do so because they claim it to be "cheap". It kinda reminds me of how m16 was to cod4 and the attitude the x-box community had for it. "ooh oohh m16 such a noob rifle" and yet only a few could actually get a good k/d with the gun. It's sad to see a part of the SC2 community has fallen to this shitty level. 4 gate doesn't get you far in life, is it a good build? yes. Does it win you every game? Hell no. Any opponent who actually knows how to scout can easily beat a 4 gate and this is the reason why it is so damn rare to see a 4gate nowadays in diamond. Then again, if you want to prove me wrong then kindly go ahead.This thread is specially made for people like you. | ||
|
Spiegel
Australia79 Posts
On November 24 2010 18:20 haegN wrote: I agree, people saying you dont learn a lot from 4 gating is wrong, you definately learn to micro! Its a good build for having quick micro battles. If you are winning 75% of games with 4 gate are you better or worse than someone who wins 60% of games with a macro oriented play? | ||
|
HellRoxYa
Sweden1614 Posts
Basically, 4gate doesn't teach you anything. This guy obviously had no idea how to play past the first push. ... ooor he realized his allin didn't work and had no way to recover and prefered to not waste his time. You can also 4gate without going allin, in which case quitting the game after it fails is indeed rather lulsy. | ||
| ||
