• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:24
CEST 14:24
KST 21:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 670 users

The tricky nature of discussing balance - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
Subversion
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
South Africa3627 Posts
September 06 2010 07:25 GMT
#21
great read and insightful, thanks man
NicolBolas
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1388 Posts
September 06 2010 08:13 GMT
#22
On September 06 2010 03:08 PJA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 23:27 Wolfpox wrote:
4. Skill = winning

Yet another reason balance discussion is tricky is thanks to the problem of valuing only the top player's opinions. Low level and average players, it is believed, have no knowledge of what is actually required to be good -- otherwise they would be doing it themselves. Your rank is like credentials, authorizing you to discuss things and be taken seriously. You earn your place at the discussion table.

Unfortunately, the fact is that even people who have never played the game can know a good deal about its balance, and whether or not certain things are fair. Many people who are good at the game don't actually pay attention to the underlying dynamics, but creative minds who understand game design principles, puzzle construction, and general ways of making something that's "easy to play, hard to master" can be much more insightful than those mechanically-oriented athletes whose only concerns are planning and executing their next strategy.


I really disagree with this. Players who aren't good really don't know anything about balance. Go back to beta when storm was nerfed. How many protoss players said storm was going to be useless and terrible? Almost all of them whined constantly. Flash forward to today. Storm is amazing PvT and PvZ, with many people now saying storm is imba late game.

This was completely due to players being worse then than they are now.

Players who are bad really don't understand the game. When I watch top players, I often don't understand how their build orders work or what they're doing, and I'm 1300 diamond with 60 apm average. I'm obviously not winning based solely on blindly executing things well with sick micro/macro, I'm a thinking player who relies more on that, but I still don't comprehend HuK's play entirely. Do you really think that a 700 player understands HuK's play more than he or I do? I doubt it.


You're sort of missing the point. The point is that a good argument for balance or imbalance can come from anywhere or anyone. Therefore, you should look at the substance of the argument, not merely who's saying it.

If someone just cries, "the area is smaller, we'll never use it again!" then they have not put forth much of an argument. They've simply cited a fact (the smaller area) and their opinion on that subject. This statement can, and should, be freely ignored because it is completely unqualified. It's not an argument.

There will always be a lot of ignorant posting on balance. You should disregard it because it is obviously ignorant, not because of who's saying it. That way, when a person comes along who actually is knowledgeable, and makes a reasoned argument for or against a position, you can afford it the proper weight rather than rejecting it out of hand.
So you know, cats are interesting. They are kind of like girls. If they come up and talk to you, it's great. But if you try to talk to them, it doesn't always go so well. - Shigeru Miyamoto
Wolfpox
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada164 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 05:59:55
September 07 2010 05:58 GMT
#23
NicolBolas, you're correct.

I mean having experience with the game is obviously good when discussing balance, but you can practice the shit out of the game versus your friends, or Insane A.I. even, and master all sorts of things -- and yet you won't be in "Diamond League". You could be a great player with a solid knowledge of mechanics, high APM and strategy, but simply not have played the games to climb the ladder.

You could also go into the ladder and practice all sorts of zany build orders, experiment, and be in Silver League because you weren't trying to win at all costs. A lot of people in Diamond Rank have won with a handful of memorized strategies, and then they think they know everything. Meanwhile, people who are actually exploring strategies and allowing themselves to take risks and lose are suddenly not valid to a discussion? It's just stupid. TeamLiquid is all about respecting veterans, but when it comes to balance discussion, it doesn't need to boil down to numbers, facts and experience. If you want to talk about numbers, then yes, you should know the facts -- but concepts, ideas, and the "feel" of things is what actually matters -- the numbers are just there to produce a result. That result is more important than the number.
[B] Butigroove wrote:[/B] Blizzard is double expanding to the natural gold base of our poor little nerd hearts.
Paperscraps
Profile Joined March 2010
United States639 Posts
September 07 2010 08:13 GMT
#24
Great, great OP!

Most people that read the OP and "appreciate" it aren't the target audience that really needs to see it. If one person reads through it and is "enlightened", then it was definitely worth the time and effort.

I for one, tip my hat to you good sir.
"Because in the end, the only way we can measure the significance of our own lives is by valuing the lives of others.” - David Gale
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
September 07 2010 08:20 GMT
#25
I have to half agree/disagree with your point about lower level players having a seat at the discussion table while pro level players will disregard all lower level opinion.

For the most part, I think pro player's pragmatism is what will ultimately be accepted as the "truth" in balance discussion - what they do just works. They don't second question it probably because they've played enough games to see what happens when you stray away from the pragmatic path. However, that doesn't mean some pro players don't experiment with certain builds and strategies - qxc's build tester is sort of a testament to some pro's willingness to experiment.

In the end, I think its fair to only listen to pro players because they go to the top with what works. Lower level players can randomly shout out solutions - and hey some may just work - but I think thats more attributed to random suggestions rather than true understanding of the game.

I don't want to take an extreme stance, so I'll say that some lower level contributions are valuable due to understanding of the game despite lack of mechanics. But I'll argue that this group is a minority in terms of a solid understanding of the deeper strategies and mind games in strategic trends.

Hope to hear your thoughts on it.
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
Wolfpox
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada164 Posts
September 07 2010 15:16 GMT
#26
On September 07 2010 17:20 shindigs wrote:
In the end, I think its fair to only listen to pro players because they go to the top with what works. Lower level players can randomly shout out solutions - and hey some may just work - but I think thats more attributed to random suggestions rather than true understanding of the game.

I don't want to take an extreme stance, so I'll say that some lower level contributions are valuable due to understanding of the game despite lack of mechanics. But I'll argue that this group is a minority in terms of a solid understanding of the deeper strategies and mind games in strategic trends.

Hope to hear your thoughts on it.


Sure there are some high level players who are willing to experiment. But do they create suggestions and balance feedback based on that? It's just part of the pragmatism, of creating a more efficient way of doing something. That's what they do: refine everything and streamline it. That's what creating build orders are all about, and that's what high level gamers do best right now. When it comes to seeing past the "here and now" and questioning the way things "should be", they are still either quiet, or their opinions are painted as biased complaints.

If qxc said that he had found a build that was too powerful, or didn't "feel" right, he would still have the burden of proof, player-blame, the game's newness, and everything else to contend with! Anyone who suggests a change is supposed to have a handful of replays, statistical flow charts, and a ton of other wonderfully impressive shit that people will still dismiss based on one of the factors I discussed. The conversation goes nowhere, unfortunately.

"Doing what works" is only proof that you can do what works. What I said about the Diamond League becoming increasingly watered down thanks to divisions also needs to be kept in mind. Every week, some people are thrown into Diamond League based on their placement matches, and don't even know why. Sadly, the rank means very little, really, although it should be a clear indicator of knowledge, understanding and skill.

It's such a tricky thing to discuss. Nobody is in a position to discuss it, and yet it needs to be discussed. What other solution does that point to than simply considering -- and yet being thoughtful and critical of -- every suggestion, regardless of where it comes from?
[B] Butigroove wrote:[/B] Blizzard is double expanding to the natural gold base of our poor little nerd hearts.
Petshop
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada73 Posts
September 07 2010 16:04 GMT
#27
Great post, thank you for this!
R0YAL
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States1768 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 16:32:38
September 07 2010 16:31 GMT
#28
On September 05 2010 23:27 Wolfpox wrote:

Another reason why discussing balance is tricky is because every player who has a favorite race can be called biased, and those who select Random or have no favorite race are never as familiar with the cutting-edge strategies of the races as somebody who specializes. The probability of a biased perspective means that we should probably "filter" every opinion by assuming every player wants their race to be at least a little bit overpowered, and their other races to be at a slight disadvantage. You can never trust a player to be truly fair.

Almost stopped reading because of that extreme use of "never" which is highly objective, however the article was well written so I read on You present some good points, balance is very tricky because of the vast skill differences of everyone around the globe. Not everyone is the same level of skill ofc so just because one person wins in a certain situation doesnt mean that everyone will win in that circumstance. Blizzard also goes even further because they are striving to balance the game on all levels of play, something that im pretty sure is impossible lol >_< The only way that will ever happen is after the game has been figured in at least 5+ years and everyone knows the game inside and out because its the most popular thing on tv, or in other words "my wet dream." ^_^
gl blizz
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Wolfpox
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada164 Posts
September 08 2010 12:10 GMT
#29
On September 08 2010 01:31 R0YAL wrote:
Almost stopped reading because of that extreme use of "never" which is highly objective, however the article was well written so I read on


You know you're absolutely right. I edited it to correct that, the wording was too strong there. Truth is I was talking about how the average person's perspective would assume that Random is weaker than a devoted race, but it's better as something moderate.

I'm glad you guys like the post, I really thought it needed to be said too.
[B] Butigroove wrote:[/B] Blizzard is double expanding to the natural gold base of our poor little nerd hearts.
kmisho64
Profile Joined September 2010
United States5 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 19:06:57
September 13 2010 19:05 GMT
#30
The "imbalances" in Chess were worked out from around 1300 to about 1500, 200 years, and even with that chess is easier to balance for several reasons: turn-based vs real-time, mirror pieces. Things move faster now than they did back then, but not so fast that a game like Starcraft can be balanced in a year or even in a decade. Modern pace also hurts balancing efforts because most games are born and die before potential issues even register.

Given the pace of computer change, the novelty- and modernization-seeking gaming public, the more philosophical difficulties mentioned above, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that there will never be a balanced RTS.

Oh we can make them good enough for jazz, but we're just going to have to get used to imbalance. If you think a side is underpowered, you're just going to have to stop playing it. If you think one is overpowered, play it. And, in either case, no complaining.

The best we can hope for is some tinkering with the relatively obvious near the beginning...where we are now. After that, the only way to balance a game is with years or even decades of continual play and a few generations of genius vs. genius. But we'll need a game that can last through all that.

Blizzard could do something historic in this direction if they took the Brood War engine exactly as it is and applied modern graphics so the game can keep on going. I'd buy it in a heartbeat. But Blizzard will never compete with its own new game. Maybe updating Brood War is all they should have done in the first place...
McFoo
Profile Joined April 2010
United Kingdom180 Posts
September 13 2010 19:22 GMT
#31

For example, if a fourth race was introduced, which could technically win in any match-up, but only if the player had over 1,000 Actions Per Minute or the opponent made several critical errors...


Zerg?
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Playoffs Stage
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #136
CranKy Ducklings107
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 524
StarCraft: Brood War
Barracks 3624
actioN 2170
Larva 1236
Hyuk 1048
Mini 995
Stork 567
Soma 505
firebathero 438
TY 267
Pusan 252
[ Show more ]
Last 244
Dewaltoss 144
Hyun 113
JulyZerg 86
ToSsGirL 81
Backho 68
Bonyth 48
Light 23
GoRush 17
Icarus 10
SilentControl 7
Dota 2
Gorgc7870
singsing2843
qojqva842
XcaliburYe285
Fuzer 179
canceldota66
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K18
sgares1
Super Smash Bros
Westballz32
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor182
Other Games
B2W.Neo1567
DeMusliM395
Lowko186
Trikslyr24
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2681
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH258
• sitaska43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1328
• Jankos1255
Upcoming Events
CSO Contender
4h 36m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 36m
Online Event
1d 3h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.