| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Fueled
United States1610 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:27 Noocta wrote: They need to realize how good 5 range queen will be at denying hellions and reapers. Ya it looks like its going towards mainly denying hellions | ||
|
Jarree
Finland1004 Posts
| ||
|
Artosis
United States2140 Posts
Korean casters, of course, are very good and skilled. BUT. Its a different product. A script + 3 casters, and a set way to do things. English commentary is thought up on the spot with 2 casters. Korean commentators, over all, are analytically superior to most English commentary. Different production values, styles, etc. Stop with the crazy posts + drama pls, thanks! :D <3 S2 | ||
|
Stanlot
United States5742 Posts
| ||
|
SenorChang
Australia4730 Posts
on the topic of drama, wonder how long it'll take before it starts driving people away from the community, would really hate to see that happening - (might already happen with spectators but I mean community figures) | ||
|
LuckoftheIrish
United States4791 Posts
Currently down. | ||
|
corpuscle
United States1967 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:30 Jarree wrote: Does a queen beat 4 hellions now that it cannot be kited? That would be insane. I'm sure it kills 2 hellions which is also stupid if you look at the costs. It's also worth noting that it's an indirect nerf to reactor hellion into cloaked banshees, which relies in part on doing some extra damage to the queens with your initial hellions. | ||
|
LXenJin
Singapore293 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
 | ||
|
Altern
United States1053 Posts
| ||
|
fallenknight
Canada19 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:32 Artosis wrote: Hey guys, just to verify: Korean casters, of course, are very good and skilled. BUT. Its a different product. A script + 3 casters, and a set way to do things. English commentary is thought up on the spot with 2 casters. Korean commentators, over all, are analytically superior to most English commentary. Different production values, styles, etc. Stop with the crazy posts + drama pls, thanks! :D <3 S2 Nice try, but the drama never ends.  | ||
|
Sylverin
United States480 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:32 Artosis wrote: Hey guys, just to verify: Korean casters, of course, are very good and skilled. BUT. Its a different product. A script + 3 casters, and a set way to do things. English commentary is thought up on the spot with 2 casters. Korean commentators, over all, are analytically superior to most English commentary. Different production values, styles, etc. Stop with the crazy posts + drama pls, thanks! :D <3 S2 All hail the king :D some of us knew what you meant. | ||
|
Jono7272
United Kingdom6330 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:32 Artosis wrote: Hey guys, just to verify: Korean casters, of course, are very good and skilled. BUT. Its a different product. A script + 3 casters, and a set way to do things. English commentary is thought up on the spot with 2 casters. Korean commentators, over all, are analytically superior to most English commentary. Different production values, styles, etc. Stop with the crazy posts + drama pls, thanks! :D <3 S2 So nowadays we are all paying more and more to watch; why are we not seeing a increase in production value in one of the most important parts for the viewer, the commentary? Nearly everyone agreed after watching the subbed Korean commentary it was better, Why can't English commentary have the same effort put into it as Korean commentary? We realise they are different, but why should they be? Why should English commentary be inferior? (Which in most peoples views, it is.) | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:49 Jono7272 wrote: So nowadays we are all paying more and more to watch; why are we not seeing a increase in production value in one of the most important parts for the viewer, the commentary? Nearly everyone agreed after watching the subbed Korean commentary it was better, Why can't English commentary have the same effort put into it as Korean commentary? We realise they are different, but why should they be? Why should English commentary be inferior? (Which in most peoples views, it is.) They talked about this during the show, there's many leagues all around the world and only like 3 or 4 casters get universal positive feedback. They agreed most casters need to work harder, the production value is up to the leagues to implement and not them. | ||
|
evaunit01
United States512 Posts
| ||
|
Artosis
United States2140 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:49 Jono7272 wrote: So nowadays we are all paying more and more to watch; why are we not seeing a increase in production value in one of the most important parts for the viewer, the commentary? Nearly everyone agreed after watching the subbed Korean commentary it was better, Why can't English commentary have the same effort put into it as Korean commentary? We realise they are different, but why should they be? Why should English commentary be inferior? (Which in most peoples views, it is.) Speaking strictly for myself here: I disagree that the Korean commentary experience is better. I actually do really love it, but at the same time, I really enjoy the freestyle banter between commentators. Examples: Doa + KevinKnocke, MrBitter + Rotterdam, etc. You are stating these things as if they are facts. Its opinions. Different != worse. Different != better. | ||
|
UTL_Unlimited
Korea (South)353 Posts
On May 04 2012 10:49 Jono7272 wrote: So nowadays we are all paying more and more to watch; why are we not seeing a increase in production value in one of the most important parts for the viewer, the commentary? Nearly everyone agreed after watching the subbed Korean commentary it was better, Why can't English commentary have the same effort put into it as Korean commentary? We realise they are different, but why should they be? Why should English commentary be inferior? (Which in most peoples views, it is.) ? English speaking commentaries for major tournaments have gotten better with experience. I don't understand this point. Korean commentary seem better from a subbed context because of years of experience and production (Yes, even GOM. They had GSLs before the whole SC2 thing) But the English speaking commentaries have made strides in major ways. Of course, I still prefer the Korean commentary more, but that's because it's my native tongue, not because it's inferior in any way. The only thing I would say is inferior is the 'level of excitement one brings about with words', but that's a language difference, nothing more. | ||
|
itmeJP
United States1101 Posts
http://sotg-sc2.blogspot.com/2012/05/sotg-ep68.html | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13414 Posts
On May 04 2012 11:05 Artosis wrote: Speaking strictly for myself here: I disagree that the Korean commentary experience is better. I actually do really love it, but at the same time, I really enjoy the freestyle banter between commentators. Examples: Doa + KevinKnocke, MrBitter + Rotterdam, etc. You are stating these things as if they are facts. Its opinions. Different != worse. Different != better. Grass is greener is all I can say when people want "better" casting. I love the mix between banter and insight you and Tasteless provide to the community. I personally sometimes just want to relax while watching SC and don't want to think very hard about what is going on so to get both is really nice. I think its the same reason some people want korean style casting is the same reason some people Kpop and hate american pop. It is exotic and different and people like it when things are different. They think that the other thing is better than what they have (in this case korean casting vs nonkorean casting). I think it might be influenced by the fact that korean players are put on a pedestal and this same mystique might be getting transferred to the korean casters as well. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
Serral vs Rogue
BlizzCon
IdrA vs MC
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
