EPTNot to say terran doesnt need some nerfs, they do, but I dont think its as bad as people make it out to seem.
Dimaga may switch to Terran - Page 51
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Skyze
Canada2324 Posts
Not to say terran doesnt need some nerfs, they do, but I dont think its as bad as people make it out to seem. | ||
|
nttea
Sweden4353 Posts
On August 19 2010 09:24 Sen wrote: Zerg is fine imo . its depand on what maps we play ZvT Lost Templar <--- very hard for ZvT for example -.- Steppes of War <--- no comments this map ZvT -_- Kulas Ravine <--- lol Rofl lmao for ZvT Metalopolis <--- its like 12:00 vs 8:00 and 2:00 vs 6:00 really hard for ZvT Others i think its fine in ZvT  Show replays! the zerg race needs you!! | ||
|
Zinbiel
Sweden878 Posts
On August 19 2010 14:42 biarecare wrote: No need to switch races to get Blizzard's attention. Just convince Jaedong to play SC2, then Zerg will be so imbalanced that it'll get nerfed. Weak argument, complaining Racial imbalances in a game that's few months old is simply hilarious. The fact that having sponsored players in a premature game is simply contradictory. The whole competitive SC2 hype is simply laughable, it took Brood Wars years to balance it out with Kespa maps and become competitive. People are just rushing to be good in SC2 and think they'll become the next Boxer in SC2 since it's new. What a bunch of egocentric idiots. SC2 still needs a lot to work (possibly expansions) to live up the hype of its predecessor's sequel. well, if flash played sc2 he would probably not drop a single game to anyone ever, even if jaedong also switched. I for one don't think defending reaper harass will get easier the better control both players have. | ||
|
mesohawny
Canada193 Posts
they only thing they have to worry about is a baneling bust (lol) which is stopped with a single scan. Zerg can win, it just requires double the amount of effort on behalf of the zerg player to win, and he isn't alotted as many "mistakes" before it's game over. Playing zerg is kind of like racing a skyline in your moms civic. | ||
|
Zevah
Argentina187 Posts
| ||
|
Baarn
United States2702 Posts
| ||
|
Opinion
United States236 Posts
On August 19 2010 20:04 Chocobo wrote: I have a theory that terran players really are better than zerg players. See, the most skilled players are also the ones who will play to win at any cost... so many of them will switch to terran, because in SC2 after all the goal is to win games. This leads to a higher concentration of skill among terrans, and lower skill level among zerg. (It's obvious that something is wrong with the TvZ matchup... but I wonder if something like this could be significant or not) This is THE worst excuse for imbalance in competitive games. Worst 2 imo 1. "It is not that X is OP, X just attracts a more mature and skilled player." 2. "X is not OP, Y just doesn't know how to play." Unless you are specifically using that classic cliche for trolling purposes, in which case, you got me... | ||
|
SkeweredFromEarToEye
Canada19 Posts
| ||
|
Snuggles
United States1865 Posts
| ||
|
BadManner
71 Posts
On August 19 2010 22:56 SkeweredFromEarToEye wrote: I am a Z player (Diamond-level, for what it's worth), and am pretty much fed up with the fact that T can just wall off their ramp and sit comfortably in their base for however long, knowing they're safe from all attacks (bling bust being the exception here, but try it out in Diamond League and see how many times you're successful). I may be wrong, as I didn't play BW much, but isn't the situation similar in Brood War? Wall-offs were just as common, and Terran play revolved around turtling in just the same manner. What would be the difference? | ||
|
bevey
United States16 Posts
| ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On August 19 2010 23:18 bevey wrote: Dimaga would be doing alot better with Zerg if he would stop doing all in strategies or atleast had an economic follow through to his innovative openings. his problem seem to be the maps. He was playing standard on BS and Metalo, but allined on LT and SoW which are obviously unfair for Zerg | ||
|
Jinsin5
Canada44 Posts
On August 19 2010 23:17 BadManner wrote: I may be wrong, as I didn't play BW much, but isn't the situation similar in Brood War? Wall-offs were just as common, and Terran play revolved around turtling in just the same manner. What would be the difference? Mutas were not denied so easily, turrets used to take 13 hits to kill one, now it is 7, and trying to harass while a thor is sitting inside a T's base with SCV's at the ready to repair is suicide. | ||
|
jambam
United States324 Posts
On August 19 2010 23:18 bevey wrote: Dimaga would be doing alot better with Zerg if he would stop doing all in strategies or atleast had an economic follow through to his innovative openings. If you actually watched him play for more than a few tournament games you would realize that he will only "all in" on maps where he knows he has a severe disadvantage. ie. lost temple. most of the time he plays standard. | ||
|
AppleTart
United States1261 Posts
On August 19 2010 23:25 Jinsin5 wrote: Mutas were not denied so easily, turrets used to take 13 hits to kill one, now it is 7, and trying to harass while a thor is sitting inside a T's base with SCV's at the ready to repair is suicide. I would also like to add that Zerg could contain with lurkers as well! | ||
|
dartoo
India2889 Posts
nice to see zerg win,makes you wonder why he considered switching.. | ||
|
tailakate
United States3 Posts
| ||
|
Snuggles
United States1865 Posts
| ||
|
Trok67
France384 Posts
| ||
|
dartoo
India2889 Posts
http://www.esl-world.net/masters/season5/gamescom/sc2/groupstage/match/19475178/ | ||
| ||
