EPTSiege Tanks being more easily built = Good, but needs to be better.
Overall, pretty awesome.
Patch 8 Discussion - Page 36
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Zeke50100
United States2220 Posts
Siege Tanks being more easily built = Good, but needs to be better. Overall, pretty awesome. | ||
|
Gigaudas
Sweden1213 Posts
| ||
|
Phanekim
United States777 Posts
| ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
On April 08 2010 07:46 Zexion wrote: And here we go again, more talk about wanting the old units back. If you mean that hydras are to return to what they were in SC:BW, wouldn't it screw other things up? If one thing changes in the game, you probably have to make adjustments to other things as well, especially if we are talking about BIG changes such as returning hydras back to the SC:BW version. Don't forget that they are stronger now, but also that you need Lair to get them. No, they're not the same as in SC:BW, but are they really supposed to be? I'm not the best player around here so you might think this is a load of bullshit, but this is at least what I think about bringing old units back into the SC2. I disagree with that, but only to a certain degree of course. But I still think we need to adapt to the new units and their roles instead of whining about the "disappearance of micro" and old units. Hydras aren't the same as they were in BW, yes I agree. They're stronger, yes. But they've been moved back to T2. Isn't that enough of a nerf to balance the +2 damage and +1 range? Besides, hydra seem to be slower now and 100/50/2 for an 80 hp hydra is kind of ridiculous. | ||
|
lolnoty
United States7166 Posts
On April 08 2010 07:55 Phanekim wrote: i sense they are trying to balance and create variety in same race matchups before dealing with the other matchups. Was Void Ray breaking PvP? | ||
|
WorkersOfTheWorld
United States619 Posts
| ||
|
btlyger
United States470 Posts
| ||
|
Canukian
Canada69 Posts
| ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On April 08 2010 06:09 Feefee wrote: Yeah I did the same^^. Was terran first, switched to random after the reset and decided toss was the harder/more involved race to win with (for me at least). And yet blizzard refuses to let me play the underdog by patching the other races to balanced levels!>< I suppose I don't mind the changes but I'm starting to feel like they're balancing this game like they do WoW: if enough people whine about it we'll change it. I certainly had a hard time with early game marauder slow too but so what? Intense moments of "oh crap I gotta micro this" are a good thing in my eyes. This takes alot of the tension out of the early TvP game =( Tension? What are you talking about. Slow didn't add any tension at all - if anything it removed it by removing the ability for the enemy to hit and run and removing much of the micro needed vs Zealots. If anything it killed the spectator value to me. | ||
|
Nub4ever
Canada1981 Posts
On April 08 2010 02:39 DarkSanta wrote: MECH HERE I COME. I think.. Immortals T_T | ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
| ||
|
2SCV1cup
69 Posts
| ||
|
lolnoty
United States7166 Posts
On April 08 2010 08:18 Canukian wrote: Really the tank "buff" is nothing. I like the thor time decrease, but tanks need more dmg or less gas cost. Down to 100 would be sufficient to make them effective. They shouldn't bother with costs at all, just make the time it takes to siege up lower than 5 years and increase the splash to at least how it was in BW. They nerfed tanks going in SC2 not realizing that tanks are only the backbone when combined with mines (which is gone) and cliff advantage (which is also gone) + the "dragoons" in SC2 have blink, which eliminates a volley or two altogether that would have normally gone off. | ||
|
NicolBolas
United States1388 Posts
Marines. | ||
diehilde
Germany1596 Posts
| ||
|
Chronopolis
Canada1484 Posts
Maruader slow nerf is good stuff, great way to slightly nerf maruaders. Roach armor is a good change, zealots can actually do decent damage on roaches now. | ||
|
afg-warrior
Afghanistan328 Posts
| ||
|
unclean
United States8 Posts
On April 08 2010 08:28 diehilde wrote: after like 10 games i can safely say roaches are dead now zvz. its all about lings now. not that its much better. as for the other mus, I lost everything except a baneling bust zvp against runa. Wait, why? Wouldn't it be blings > lings > roaches > blings? | ||
|
Chen
United States6344 Posts
On April 08 2010 08:15 btlyger wrote: Zerg player, was 11-1 before patch. Now im 12-9. enough said. yes, you are another retard who has succumbed to the placebo effect. shit happens, you start losing and instead of figuring out what you did wrong and what to do better you cry about the nerf and keep losing because of it. You're just like that zerg player who builds ultras, sends them in piecemeal without hydra/roach support into a 200/200 3/3 toss army with 10 collossi+immortal support then cries omg ultras are useless/waste of money and need to be buffed | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
I don't think I like the hydra HP nerf, storm gonna leave them at 1 hp now? What's with the tunneling claws nerf too? It wasn't too fast at all. Does a void ray still kill a queen 1v1? wtf, why do they keep making thor's better and better? It was good by itself before the flak canons imo (it's a support/tank role for your marines) Now it's becoming more standalone unit. edit- actually this marauder nerf doesn't really do much at all >.< They are still gonna have concussive when they have like 6 or so marauders and that is when they move out. | ||
| ||
