EPTThey are not static :D
Zerg players, FRIGGING use sunks and spores!!! - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
They are not static :D | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
semi-static. Unless you are spreading creep across the map to their base and/or dropping ooze to attack with them. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
| ||
|
caution.slip
United States775 Posts
On February 22 2010 06:08 Zoler wrote: Because they are UGLLYYYYYY they are ugly though. Why don't they just keep the original going underground animation. I know people were liek "how can someting with a long tongue underground uproot and walk around" but the long tongue isn't actually underground. If you watch the sunken animation a tongue comes up, curls into the ground, and then pops back up. This is no less believable than a long tongue that magically gets longer? bring back the old animation i say | ||
|
zergpower123
United States197 Posts
It seems like sunkens and spores should be utilized more now that they aren't stationary and if you build one on the wrong place, its all good as you can move it. Your army shouldn't be running from base to base. It should be out there in the open to pick off the enemy or to harass. The sunks and spores can be there to help defend the base. | ||
|
crate
United States2474 Posts
2 roaches is 290 HP with 2 armor with 32 damage (though you lose half of it when you lose 145 HP) for 150 minerals, 50 gas and 2 larva. Ok, roaches do have significantly less range too (but they can move). And they're both biological/armored, so except vs stuff with building-specific attacks (only reapers?) they take the same bonus damage too. Spine crawlers are only marginally better than roaches (and that much only because they're cheaper) is probably what it comes down to. Except roaches can move--and therefore be useful for map control and offense--and they build much faster. I'm not really seeing the reason to use spine crawlers over roaches just from looking at the stats. Maybe there's an attack speed difference too that makes spine crawlers worth it? Looks to me like they're mainly poorly designed right now though. | ||
|
IskatuMesk
Canada969 Posts
| ||
|
Rotodyne
United States2263 Posts
| ||
|
ababa
Switzerland17 Posts
Some more ground units >> spine crawler. The spore seems ok against air when not going muta, since we have no scourge anymore. | ||
| ||
