| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
urashimakt
United States1591 Posts
On December 06 2012 19:46 imPermanenCe wrote: Exactly. Maybe they think it's too complicated to put it in words in the patch notes :D So only the people that care (TL) will figure out.  I like to think there's one rogue programmer working at Blizzard who masked new ammo launch code as code for the new collapsible rocks. | ||
|
urashimakt
United States1591 Posts
On December 06 2012 19:51 n00b1n8R wrote: While its great that they added the change to the leash mechanics, its unclear from the video as to whether they added the deployed movement from BW which Nony talked about. Can anybody confirm whether they did? Stop-moving returns the interceptors to the carrier. The shown change is the only one I found after attempting all of Nony's stunts. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On December 06 2012 19:43 Callynn wrote: Now remove the boring tempest and replace it with something cool? They will probably do that in LotV ;P I actually kinda like the possible relationship between the Carrier and the Tempest. With the Tempest, you get a long-range (range 15) siege flier that is easier to use but has lower DPS. With the Carrier, you get a sorta long-range (Interceptor release range 8, leash range 14) siege flier that is harder to use but has higher DPS. A skilled player can possibly make Carriers do wonders, but at the cost of babysitting the Carriers to make maximum use of their leash-range target-switching. Meanwhile, a Tempest doesn't require as much babysitting as long as it's positioned correctly, but at the cost of some DPS. I wonder how all theorycrafting will turn out in the live game, however. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On December 06 2012 19:43 Callynn wrote: Now remove the boring tempest and replace it with something cool? They will probably do that in LotV ;P Tempest boring? It's awesome x_x | ||
|
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
| ||
|
d00p
711 Posts
+1 tempest hate is baffling to me. The unit is cool. | ||
|
fezvez
France3021 Posts
I don't think there's a need for instant full interceptor launch. First because it looks more like a bug than anything else. Second because it makes an upgrade relevant. Anyway, I love it. thanks Blizz <3 | ||
|
BeyondCtrL
Sweden642 Posts
 Interceptors still return if you attack, stop, and move. You can't instantly launch like BW, though with gravitic launcher it's not necessary, tbh. | ||
|
urashimakt
United States1591 Posts
On December 06 2012 20:14 BeyondCtrL wrote: I just made a test map with the Editor using the newest patch, confirmed that it is working Interceptors still return if you attack, stop, and move. You can't instantly launch like BW, though with gravitic launcher it's not necessary, tbh. The one drawback is that you must always engage a fresh battle from 8 units away initially. | ||
|
phodacbiet
United States1740 Posts
| ||
|
BeyondCtrL
Sweden642 Posts
On December 06 2012 20:17 urashimakt wrote: The one drawback is that you must always engage a fresh battle from 8 units away initially. Could use a sacrificial Zealot. Would add some interesting micro possibilities imo. | ||
|
nucLeaRTV
Romania822 Posts
| ||
|
Hapse
Denmark50 Posts
| ||
|
TechNoTrance
Canada1007 Posts
| ||
|
leveller
Sweden1840 Posts
On December 06 2012 19:51 n00b1n8R wrote: While its great that they added the change to the leash mechanics, its unclear from the video as to whether they added the deployed movement from BW which Nony talked about. Can anybody confirm whether they did? I love the carrier change that was carried out by blizzard, to allow more micro. However, "deploying interceptors with stop command" is in my eyes nothing less than a bug or at the very least, extremely confusing and counter intuitive; if it was possible to have them out at all times, why not simply have them always out? It makes no sense to add a bug-exploit that doesn't even do much, after the quick-lauch upgrade. | ||
|
Berceno
Spain401 Posts
| ||
|
Chloroplaste
France281 Posts
| ||
|
Gaius Baltar
United States449 Posts
| ||
|
Alex1Sun
494 Posts
On December 06 2012 19:30 GolemMadness wrote: It is so beautiful. Weird how it wasn't mentioned in the recent patch notes, though. It's a Easter egg A beautiful one at that! Fantastic job, Blizzard, I love you! | ||
|
ejac
United States1195 Posts
There were numerous more differences than just the micro why carriers were good against terran in bw, and most of those reasons are absent in sc2. It does give me hope at least that perhaps DB and kim might be willing to make some other necessary changes though, not that much hope though. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 mouzHeroMarine StarCraft: Brood War 448SteadfastSC  345IndyStarCraft  172White-Ra  166UpATreeSC 139ProTech118 Railgan 48ROOTCatZ 20Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games FrodaN1418 fl0m825 Beastyqt610 Mlord540 ceh9441 KnowMe203 shahzam156 ArmadaUGS149 C9.Mang0100 Mew2King74 Trikslyr55 Pyrionflax17 OptimusSC21 |
|
OSC
Replay Cast
OSC
LAN Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
LAN Event
IPSL
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
BSL 21
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
