The actual physics of these 'physics effects' seems to be a bit off. When you march a group of units into siege tank fire, according to the video more of their body parts fly forward than backward. While the victims certainly had forward momentum, I'm pretty sure that a tank shell coming your way has more momentum. So most of the body parts should be flying backwards (in the direction of tank-fire) rather than forwards (in the direction of unit movement).

cidmizar

France2 Posts

November 02 2012 10:59 GMT

#24

Animations when hit by tanks make sense because of the explosion. Animation when hit by banelings don't (it not the explosion that kills, it's the acid).

TiTanIum_

Brazil1335 Posts

November 02 2012 11:13 GMT

#25

On November 02 2012 19:52 Rannasha wrote:
The actual physics of these 'physics effects' seems to be a bit off. When you march a group of units into siege tank fire, according to the video more of their body parts fly forward than backward. While the victims certainly had forward momentum, I'm pretty sure that a tank shell coming your way has more momentum. So most of the body parts should be flying backwards (in the direction of tank-fire) rather than forwards (in the direction of unit movement).

What you are saying doesn't make sense.

Existor

Russian Federation4295 Posts

November 02 2012 11:14 GMT

#26

Animations when hit by tanks make sense because of the explosion. Animation when hit by banelings don't (it not the explosion that kills, it's the acid).

It can be considered as explosion.

Chicken Chaser

United States533 Posts

November 02 2012 11:25 GMT

#27

On November 02 2012 20:14 Existor wrote:

Show nested quote +

It can be considered as explosion.

I thought it was the acid that kills too. Banelings don't seem to "explode" like a bomb per se..

Cabinet Sanchez

Australia1097 Posts

November 02 2012 11:36 GMT

#28

This is really awesome but needs to be about 50% less intense - as it is, shit is just going everywhere, quite distracting but cool.

Cabinet Sanchez

Australia1097 Posts

November 02 2012 11:37 GMT

#29

On November 02 2012 20:13 TiTanIum_ wrote:

Show nested quote +

What you are saying doesn't make sense.

Actually no, what you are saying doesn't make sense.

johnny123

521 Posts

November 02 2012 11:40 GMT

#30

i think there could be a little bit of improvements to the physics. I definitely think the inertia of the tank blast should send units flying in the direction of the inertia . Seeing a tank shot come from certain directions blasting units towards the inerita doesn't look to convincing physics wise ( but there will be a few instances realistically where limbs would fly in any direction, but for the main body mass it should fly in the right direction. But then again if a tank shot hits the center of a group of units, it makes sense it sends bodys flying in any direction. Overall i like it, Well done blizzard.

Daswollvieh

5553 Posts

November 02 2012 11:41 GMT

#31

Now everybody dies like a reaper.

papaz

Sweden4149 Posts

November 02 2012 11:52 GMT

#32

This was not impressive at all. So now every unit has body parts flying all over the screen?

Existor

Russian Federation4295 Posts

November 02 2012 11:59 GMT

#33

On November 02 2012 20:52 papaz wrote:
This was not impressive at all. So now every unit has body parts flying all over the screen?

You can reduce it. Read 1st post again

CruelZeratul

Germany4588 Posts

November 02 2012 12:18 GMT

#34

I will turn that way down, lol, looks so bad.

gOst

415 Posts

November 02 2012 12:29 GMT

#35

I think it looks kind of neat. Obviously you won't be using it your self when you are playing but from a spectating point of view i think it will look impressive. Makes for more epic-looking battles.

CrtBalorda

Slovenia704 Posts

November 02 2012 12:35 GMT

#36

Hahahahaaha, those are pretty amusing.
Wonder how many people are gona play with low graphics now.