|
On August 11 2014 20:27 oneofthem wrote: they are not going to break 60 wins unless the east is just disastrously bad. with a soft interior d they can't coast that much.
and what if they end up going 40-1 or 39-2 at home while dominating Western Teams? This is entirely possible.
|
On August 11 2014 22:19 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2014 20:27 oneofthem wrote: they are not going to break 60 wins unless the east is just disastrously bad. with a soft interior d they can't coast that much. and what if they end up going 40-1 or 39-2 at home while dominating Western Teams? This is entirely possible.
How constructive is that comment? I don't see any hows or whys. So basically he's saying A and you're saying "and what if not A (and some more), this is possible". Well, then 60 wins happens I guess, [and they get destroyed by halfcourt defense in playoffs duuuuuh]. Point is that didn't bring anything to the table.
|
It means beating up on a weak East isn't the only way to hit 60 wins. I don't see what you're crying about. We aren't even talking about the playoffs.
|
On August 11 2014 10:57 cLutZ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2014 10:33 DystopiaX wrote: I read an analysis of the 72 win bulls and their conclusion was basically that the Bulls were historically great and even then only hit 72 wins because the league was historically weak at that point, because the expansion draft both in 89 and the same year meant that talent was diluted throughout the league. It'd be almost impossible for any team to hit 72 wins now both because few teams will ever be as good as those Bulls teams and the league as a whole will be unlikely to have diluted talent to the extent that the NBA was the year the Bulls did it. Phil in his book also basically wrote that Ohare Airport + Being in the middle of the country was also a huge part of it. Basically, they rarely had long trips and Chicago basically gave them free reign so they also had no delays. Plus, you know, Jordan. Pissed Jordan.
They also wanted it that year. They went all the way to 70-9 before resting players. The next year, they started 68-10 then lost 3 out of their last 4 because they didn't give a shit about 70 anymore.
Also, I remember that one of the ten losses during that 72-10 season was to Toronto. They had a better record against non-expansion teams.
|
On August 11 2014 23:16 Ace wrote: It means beating up on a weak East isn't the only way to hit 60 wins. I don't see what you're crying about. We aren't even talking about the playoffs.
I don't think anyone in here finds it tremendously interesting that having a top 3 all time home record while dominating a uber stacked West conference is another way to get you above the 60 mark.
That's why I immediately said that your post was a bland "what if 60 wins", because the the implication "good HR + beat western teams => 60 wins" isn't really argument worthy but it still relies on a very irrealistic premisce, at least to me.
The playoffs poke between brackets was just funsies. I like defensive, fundamental teams. That's it
|
Cleveland 2010 went 23-7 vs the West (76%) while going 38-14 vs the East (73%) with a 35-6 home record.
The year before they went 39-2 at home going 26-4 vs the West (87%) while going 40-12 vs the East (76%).
You sure this isn't realistic?
|
On August 12 2014 00:01 Ace wrote: Cleveland 2010 went 23-7 vs the West (76%) while going 38-14 vs the East (73%) with a 35-6 home record.
The year before they went 39-2 at home going 26-4 vs the West (87%) while going 40-12 vs the East (76%).
You sure this isn't realistic?
well now at least we have a point to argue about .
Still I don't think it will click right away for them and I think (and hope) their defensive weakness will hurt them a lot.
Plus I think a case could be made about the west being A LOT stronger than 2008-2010. (Spurs, durant, clippers)
|
Need to be clear here: They can still reach 60 wins (as difficult as it may be) with a league average defense and historically good offense (possible with Love+Lebron and getting another top tier offensive player.). Remember DRTG can still be above average even with shit shot protection if you dominate in rebounds, turnovers, and not fouling - almost like the Minnesota Timberwolves of last season (16,6,1 ranked respectively). You'll give up clean looks but limit opportunities while getting more shots on offense to widen Point Differential. You can have defensive weakness in 1 of the four areas and still run wild over 82 games.
With schedule quirks this can be good enough to hit 60. What I think you're talking about is the playoffs where winning without good interior defense is a pipe dream because you won't be limiting Conf Semifinals and later opponents from multiple opportunities most of the time.
As for the West being stronger than 08-10 that's probably true. The Cavs may already "fill" in 55+ wins off everyone else and the difficult part may be finding the extra 5 or so vs the elite Western teams. Lucky for the Cavs then all 3 play in different divisions so they might get a schedule break and not play OKC-SA back to back.
|
On August 12 2014 00:23 Ace wrote: Need to be clear here: They can still reach 60 wins (as difficult as it may be) with a league average defense and historically good offense (possible with Love+Lebron and getting another top tier offensive player.). Remember DRTG can still be above average even with shit shot protection if you dominate in rebounds, turnovers, and not fouling - almost like the Minnesota Timberwolves of last season (16,6,1 ranked respectively). You'll give up clean looks but limit opportunities while getting more shots on offense to widen Point Differential. You can have defensive weakness in 1 of the four areas and still run wild over 82 games.
With schedule quirks this can be good enough to hit 60. What I think you're talking about is the playoffs where winning without good interior defense is a pipe dream because you won't be limiting Conf Semifinals and later opponents from multiple opportunities most of the time.
As for the West being stronger than 08-10 that's probably true. The Cavs may already "fill" in 55+ wins off everyone else and the difficult part may be finding the extra 5 or so vs the elite Western teams. Lucky for the Cavs then all 3 play in different divisions so they might get a schedule break and not play OKC-SA back to back.
GTG but this is getting an interesting conversation.
|
I think the best argument aside from the rareness of 65 win teams is the "These guys have never played together to develop any sort of chemistry."
Like, back when the Cavs won 66 games Lebron was a worse player, the East was a stronger conference, and his best teammates were...Big Z and Delonte West? ALL STAR POINT GUARD Mo Williams? I suppose with West, Wallace and Big Z that team was definitively better defensively (though Lebron hadn't really blossomed into the top tier defender he is now) but man, when your second and third best scoring options are Delonte West and Mo Williams things have to be better than that.
Also they have a real coach instead of Mike Brown which cannot be stressed enough.
Basically, I'm not betting on it, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Cavs won more than 60 games.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
well at the extreme high end, regular season record isn't purely about how good you are. it's also about maintaining a consistently high effort level/drive. also, if you are going the high # of possessions route with emphasis on own offensive efficiency and rebounding, that is a higher variance style of play that may give you a lot of blowout wins, but sometimes the opponent hits their shots too and the rebounding edge is lessened.
the teams that won a lot of games in the regular season tend to be very good and consistent on defense. the formula for predicting wins by scoring margin has to take into account level of scoring, a 5 point margin is better when you are talking about 90-85, vs 110-105.
|
ESPN Basketball expert..... 
|
i forgot the bucks existed
|
i'm loading up on bucks players in fantasy, they're gonna surprise everyone this year.
|
no fantasy this year? last year's h2h was boring. bring back auction roto pls
|
Auction H2H lets go 
Loading up on Bucks/Sixers/Timberwolves players this year
|
Isn't a team from Atlantic Division has top 4 seed in the playoffs or they stop doing that?
|
You are correct, which is why Chad Ford being an expert is fucking comical.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
|
Ah yes, Wiggins is more athletic and Love never made the playoffs. Thrilling new insight.
Also, him comparing Wiggins to any part of the two headed defensive wing juggernaut that was Jordan and Pippen is so hilariously out of tune with the world. Just so many things in that article that bug me and sound like sports punditry.
|
|
|
|