• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:29
CET 14:29
KST 22:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA16
StarCraft 2
General
SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays What happened to TvZ on Retro? soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft 2v2 maps which are SC2 style with teams together? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2067 users

TL Health and Fitness Initiative 2011 - Page 590

Forum Index > Sports
Post a Reply
Prev 1 588 589 590 591 592 730 Next
AoN.DimSum
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States2983 Posts
September 17 2011 00:17 GMT
#11781
http://i.imgur.com/x1M9W.jpg

he was 5'6
by my idol krokkis : "U better hope Finland wont have WCG next year and that I wont gain shitloads of skill, cause then I will wash ur mouth with soap, little man."
Slithe
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States985 Posts
September 17 2011 00:18 GMT
#11782
It says in the title that he's 5'6". Given that, I would say a weight of 147 is not at all unreasonable to have a decent build.

It sounds like his routine is largely based around aesthetics, so I think it makes sense that he would want to do cardio to get that really low body fat %. Also, body shape is not exactly the best measure of strength, so I would be curious to see what his numbers actually are, as opposed to just pictures.
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 00:18 GMT
#11783
On September 17 2011 09:13 eshlow wrote:

You're asking two different questions.

Eating a lot + lifting = gaining muscle and weight in general

Eating less + cardio + light weights like he did = going to lose weight, maybe gain some muscle

These two are not nearly the same thing because you are changing multiple variables: e.g. changing diet, type of weights lifted, cardio or not, etc.

This also depends if your STARTING point is: underweight, normal weight, or obese


He was approximately normal weight, and did #2 it looks like. Now he looks shredded but I can't tell if he's underweight without his height.

If you cut caloric intake and lift heavy weights you will likely get shredded faster than what he did though.

But that's not what you're asking because you don't understand the concepts yet...

Read this:
http://www.eatmoveimprove.com/2009/08/the-relationship-between-diet-and-exercise/


Thanks for the link. It seems to give too general advice I think...

"2. You are at a “healthy weight” for your height, but want to “tone up” and gain muscle mass while losing fat.

Exercise here is the most important for any significant body composition change. Depending on the different types of exercise, your body may see fit to increase muscle mass and/or burn off excess fat mass (in conjunction with proper nutrition).

Diet is still very important because quality foods will produce faster body composition changes. This depends a lot on genetics (hence why elite athletes can generally eat crap and get away with it), but even with good body composition changes with junky food may be at the expense of overall long term health."

That's where I feel I am.

So I'm guessing the people that lift heavy and don't cut caloric intake, like the 3000+ cals people posts, are doing it not to get shredded but to just lift more?
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:29:38
September 17 2011 00:20 GMT
#11784
On September 17 2011 09:18 Slithe wrote:
It says in the title that he's 5'6". Given that, I would say a weight of 147 is not at all unreasonable to have a decent build.

It sounds like his routine is largely based around aesthetics, so I think it makes sense that he would want to do cardio to get that really low body fat %. Also, body shape is not exactly the best measure of strength, so I would be curious to see what his numbers actually are, as opposed to just pictures.


I've searched around, but I can't find any specific numbers from him. If you find any, let me know

EDIT: Hmm...you're saying that a lot of his routine is based around aesthetics. Now I'm under the impression that people who frequent this thread are looking to get healthy and fit (duh)...so does that necessarily just entail lifting heavy? I would think a lot of people would like to look good aesthetically, so wouldn't it makes sense to list advice on eating less and proper cardio for these types of people as well?
Catch
Profile Joined September 2010
United States616 Posts
September 17 2011 00:24 GMT
#11785
Box Squats
205 x 5-5-4

Close(r) stance Leg Press
180 x 10-10-10

SLDL
120 x 10-10-10

CGBP
150 x 3
135 x 5-5

Pushdown w/ Rope Pulley
110 x 10-10-10
---
So. All is dandy. The box squats kind of work my back a little more than I'm used to, and I'm not sure if that is how it is supposed to work on not. Not that it hurts, but it seems weird.Decided to replace front squats. I don't really like them, maybe I'll try something else besides the Close stance leg press. SLDL's really seem to tax my forearms when I do them (besides my glutes,hams, and lower back) which is fine by me.

CGBP is really a very mental game with me. I really need a spotter, maybe I'll even move into the squat rack like suggested, since no one uses it at my gym. Pushdowns were exquisite. lol Have a nice weekend y'all, college is about to start over hurrrrrrr too bad I got a chick so I can't have nearly as much fun.
Victory Loves Preparation
eshlow
Profile Joined June 2008
United States5210 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:31:12
September 17 2011 00:29 GMT
#11786
On September 17 2011 09:18 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:13 eshlow wrote:

You're asking two different questions.

Eating a lot + lifting = gaining muscle and weight in general

Eating less + cardio + light weights like he did = going to lose weight, maybe gain some muscle

These two are not nearly the same thing because you are changing multiple variables: e.g. changing diet, type of weights lifted, cardio or not, etc.

This also depends if your STARTING point is: underweight, normal weight, or obese


He was approximately normal weight, and did #2 it looks like. Now he looks shredded but I can't tell if he's underweight without his height.

If you cut caloric intake and lift heavy weights you will likely get shredded faster than what he did though.

But that's not what you're asking because you don't understand the concepts yet...

Read this:
http://www.eatmoveimprove.com/2009/08/the-relationship-between-diet-and-exercise/


Thanks for the link. It seems to give too general advice I think...

"2. You are at a “healthy weight” for your height, but want to “tone up” and gain muscle mass while losing fat.

Exercise here is the most important for any significant body composition change. Depending on the different types of exercise, your body may see fit to increase muscle mass and/or burn off excess fat mass (in conjunction with proper nutrition).

Diet is still very important because quality foods will produce faster body composition changes. This depends a lot on genetics (hence why elite athletes can generally eat crap and get away with it), but even with good body composition changes with junky food may be at the expense of overall long term health."

That's where I feel I am.

So I'm guessing the people that lift heavy and don't cut caloric intake, like the 3000+ cals people posts, are doing it not to get shredded but to just lift more?


It depends on what your goals are.

Gaining muscle, which is beneficial for about 99% of the sedentary population, is easier to do by eating a lot and lifting heavy.

If you are on the heavier side, it may be better to start off in a caloric deficit and lift heavy weights.

However, all of this needs to be put in context though -- most of the people that think they need to lose weight and gain muscle really just need to get bigger in general before they think about losing fat.

This includes the population that is "skinny fat" with some pudge around the abdominal area. Numerous people have come into this thread like that... and there are some here who have already done what we suggested and thank us for that.

5'6" 147 is reasonable but he would definitely look better if he added 10-15 lbs of muscle first and then cut down like he did
Overcoming Gravity: A Systematic Approach to Gymnastics and Bodyweight Strength
eshlow
Profile Joined June 2008
United States5210 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:33:36
September 17 2011 00:32 GMT
#11787
On September 17 2011 09:20 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:18 Slithe wrote:
It says in the title that he's 5'6". Given that, I would say a weight of 147 is not at all unreasonable to have a decent build.

It sounds like his routine is largely based around aesthetics, so I think it makes sense that he would want to do cardio to get that really low body fat %. Also, body shape is not exactly the best measure of strength, so I would be curious to see what his numbers actually are, as opposed to just pictures.


I've searched around, but I can't find any specific numbers from him. If you find any, let me know

EDIT: Hmm...you're saying that a lot of his routine is based around aesthetics. Now I'm under the impression that people who frequent this thread are looking to get healthy and fit (duh)...so does that necessarily just entail lifting heavy? I would think a lot of people would like to look good aesthetically, so wouldn't it makes sense to list advice on eating less and proper cardio for these types of people as well?


No.

Aesthetics is still obtained more quickly by lifting heavy first and gaining muscle mass, THEN branching out into some more a more bodybuilding type routine as an intermediate/advance lifter + cutting down with diet and cardio.

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand about this. Ignore what fitness myths you have heard about cardio and whatnot.
Overcoming Gravity: A Systematic Approach to Gymnastics and Bodyweight Strength
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 00:33 GMT
#11788
On September 17 2011 09:29 eshlow wrote:

It depends on what your goals are.

Gaining muscle, which is beneficial for about 99% of the sedentary population, is easier to do by eating a lot and lifting heavy.

If you are on the heavier side, it may be better to start off in a caloric deficit and lift heavy weights.

However, all of this needs to be put in context though -- most of the people that think they need to lose weight and gain muscle really just need to get bigger in general before they think about losing fat.

5'6" 140 something that he ended up with is reasonable I guess.... but he would look at a lot better with another 10-20 lbs of muscle on him.


Interesting, thanks. I've been browsing a lot on many different sites, and I'm still trying to convince myself that eating 3000+ cals is good. It costs me a decent amount of money to eat that much, and right now I'm barely eating 2000 cals.
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:43:00
September 17 2011 00:39 GMT
#11789
On September 17 2011 09:32 eshlow wrote:
No.

Aesthetics is still obtained more quickly by lifting heavy first and gaining muscle mass, THEN branching out into some more a more bodybuilding type routine as an intermediate/advance lifter + cutting down with diet and cardio.

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand about this. Ignore what fitness myths you have heard about cardio and whatnot.


There are no 'myths' that I've heard. I've linked you the thread where a guy eats a lot less than what's recommended here and does intense cardio. I would say that's hard evidence, not 'myth' based.

I mean here's this thread on 1 hand recommending certain things, and then that guy doing different things. You really don't see why it could be hard to understand? Your advice is on 1 end of the spectrum and what that guy did seems to be closer to the other end. That's why I'm getting confused.
AoN.DimSum
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States2983 Posts
September 17 2011 00:49 GMT
#11790
What eshlow recommends is the most effective way to gain muscle/lose weight. It doesnt mean that there arent other ways to get the same goal. There are more than one way to skin a cat.
by my idol krokkis : "U better hope Finland wont have WCG next year and that I wont gain shitloads of skill, cause then I will wash ur mouth with soap, little man."
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:54:59
September 17 2011 00:54 GMT
#11791
On September 17 2011 09:49 AoN.DimSum wrote:
What eshlow recommends is the most effective way to gain muscle/lose weight. It doesnt mean that there arent other ways to get the same goal. There are more than one way to skin a cat.


So assuming you read that reddit thread, would you say that guy could have skipped cardio entirely and had the same results? Just curious, as I'm not sure.
eshlow
Profile Joined June 2008
United States5210 Posts
September 17 2011 00:54 GMT
#11792
On September 17 2011 09:39 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:32 eshlow wrote:
No.

Aesthetics is still obtained more quickly by lifting heavy first and gaining muscle mass, THEN branching out into some more a more bodybuilding type routine as an intermediate/advance lifter + cutting down with diet and cardio.

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand about this. Ignore what fitness myths you have heard about cardio and whatnot.


There are no 'myths' that I've heard. I've linked you the thread where a guy eats a lot less than what's recommended here and does intense cardio. I would say that's hard evidence, not 'myth' based.

I mean here's this thread on 1 hand recommending certain things, and then that guy doing different things. You really don't see why it could be hard to understand? Your advice is on 1 end of the spectrum and what that guy did seems to be closer to the other end. That's why I'm getting confused.


Again,

1. He didn't do JUST cardio. He also lifted weights, albeit in the higher repetition range. As a beginner he is still going to get some hypertrophy off of it, and

2. he ate hypocalorically -- the program recommended for gaining the most muscle is to eat a lot first -- then IF you want to get more ripped you can cut down from there.

If you cannot see the difference between the recommendation made for a certain population, and what this guy did I can't help you. Additionally, just because he cut and tried to add muscle at a moderate weight does not make it evidence.

He could've improved his ability to do these things first by adding more muscle, then cutting down.

If you choose not to believe any of this and do your own thing then go for it. I hope you get the results you want.

I'm done discussing this topic. It's a waste of my time.
Overcoming Gravity: A Systematic Approach to Gymnastics and Bodyweight Strength
AoN.DimSum
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States2983 Posts
September 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#11793
On September 17 2011 09:54 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:49 AoN.DimSum wrote:
What eshlow recommends is the most effective way to gain muscle/lose weight. It doesnt mean that there arent other ways to get the same goal. There are more than one way to skin a cat.


So assuming you read that reddit thread, would you say that guy could have skipped cardio entirely and had the same results? Just curious, as I'm not sure.


no clue, I always felt that cardio ( jogging) was a waste of time. I only use it if I need to sweat off some weight for competitions.
by my idol krokkis : "U better hope Finland wont have WCG next year and that I wont gain shitloads of skill, cause then I will wash ur mouth with soap, little man."
Malinor
Profile Joined November 2008
Germany4732 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 01:02:51
September 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#11794
There are so many ways to skin a cat, and there are a lot of different pleasant aesthetics obtainable. This guy is shredded, but he is not jacked (at least from my understanding of those words). He would need to weight far more to be a jacked guy. He looks impressive, but he is certainly in no way big. Decaf weights 210@ 6'1 and is also shredded as fuck. If those two would stand beneath each other, it would be no contest in size.
You can go down many different roads and obtian results. You should also keep in mind that eshlow often argues mostly from a health point of view, where he views lifting heavy and eating a little bit more as better than eating less and doing cardio. If someone looks better at 150lb or 160lb is pretty much only a difference in opinion.
"Withstand. Suffer. Live as you must now live. There will, one day, be answer to this." ||| "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come."
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 01:02 GMT
#11795
On September 17 2011 09:54 eshlow wrote:

Again,

1. He didn't do JUST cardio. He also lifted weights, albeit in the higher repetition range. As a beginner he is still going to get some hypertrophy off of it, and

2. he ate hypocalorically -- the program recommended for gaining the most muscle is to eat a lot first -- then IF you want to get more ripped you can cut down from there.

If you cannot see the difference between the recommendation made for a certain population, and what this guy did I can't help you. Additionally, just because he cut and tried to add muscle at a moderate weight does not make it evidence.

He could've improved his ability to do these things first by adding more muscle, then cutting down.

If you choose not to believe any of this and do your own thing then go for it. I hope you get the results you want.

I'm done discussing this topic. It's a waste of my time.


You seem to be getting pretty mad at just explaining things. That's fine, you don't need to answer my question. Again, I'm just looking to get clarity and I'm asking questions. If you're getting pissed off at your inability to explain things clearly, then don't waste your time with it.


He could've improved his ability to do these things first by adding more muscle, then cutting down.
That's exactly what I wanted to know. Nowhere did I say I don't believe it. I just wasn't sure whether his way was more efficient or whether lifting and building first then cutting would be better.

So I'll just read up myself why adding more muscle and cutting after would be a quicker way to my goals compared to what this guy did...because asking questions here seems to get grumpy responses.
Froadac
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States6733 Posts
September 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#11796
At maximum what % should carbs make up? I think my diet is like 65% plus carbs lol.
funkie
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Venezuela9376 Posts
September 17 2011 01:04 GMT
#11797
Letter from Raul to his body

Dear body,

Thank you. Thank you always being there, even when bitches wanna bring you down, you are always there to pick me up and lift me with 120kg on my back. For 3 series of 5 reps. I sincerely admire you.

Regards,
Raul.

.
CJ Entusman #6! · Strength is the basis of athletic ability. -Rippetoe /* http://j.mp/TL-App <- TL iPhone App 2.0! */
Malinor
Profile Joined November 2008
Germany4732 Posts
September 17 2011 01:05 GMT
#11798
3am and I am wide awake, that's what I get for napping twice today, not even that Power Clean session today makes me tired at all
If only it would rain outside so I could take a nice refreshing walk.
"Withstand. Suffer. Live as you must now live. There will, one day, be answer to this." ||| "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come."
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 01:07 GMT
#11799
On September 17 2011 10:01 Malinor wrote:
You should also keep in mind that eshlow often argues mostly from a health point of view, where he views lifting heavy and eating a little bit more as better than eating less and doing cardio.


Yep that's what I'm understanding from his posts. However, the only reason I've found for him advocating this is that it's generally just easier for most people to do. Easy doesn't necessarily mean most efficient or best results, though.

And if I prod him too much, which you can see above, he'll get mad : \ So it's fine, I think I have a general answer, but I'll keep reading responses from people.
Malinor
Profile Joined November 2008
Germany4732 Posts
September 17 2011 01:07 GMT
#11800
On September 17 2011 10:03 Froadac wrote:
At maximum what % should carbs make up? I think my diet is like 65% plus carbs lol.


Doesn't matter for you, you need to eat, or do you want to be mistaken for a freshman again?
But eshlow would probably recommend something like 40%-50% max, but less if possible, if I had to take a wild guess.
"Withstand. Suffer. Live as you must now live. There will, one day, be answer to this." ||| "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come."
Prev 1 588 589 590 591 592 730 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
12:00
#62
WardiTV701
Harstem196
TKL 196
Rex174
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 309
Lowko266
Harstem 196
TKL 196
Rex 174
SortOf 110
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 42090
Soulkey 1696
actioN 1662
Horang2 1202
Hyuk 862
Larva 674
Soma 649
Stork 522
Light 511
Killer 409
[ Show more ]
BeSt 305
ZerO 232
Snow 162
Pusan 123
Rush 122
Hyun 105
Free 40
Mind 34
Backho 30
Terrorterran 26
Aegong 23
scan(afreeca) 18
ToSsGirL 17
zelot 17
sas.Sziky 12
SilentControl 9
Noble 8
Hm[arnc] 6
Dota 2
singsing2877
Dendi484
XcaliburYe151
BananaSlamJamma98
Counter-Strike
zeus9250
fl0m3474
olofmeister1346
x6flipin839
byalli188
Other Games
B2W.Neo1955
Fuzer 201
hiko163
Mew2King101
ArmadaUGS42
Hui .29
ZerO(Twitch)9
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream353
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV440
League of Legends
• Jankos1497
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
3h 31m
OSC
9h 31m
Wardi Open
22h 31m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 11h
Replay Cast
1d 19h
Wardi Open
1d 22h
OSC
1d 23h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
4 days
LAN Event
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.