• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 02:09
CET 08:09
KST 16:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book10Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info7herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker3PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar)9Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win2RSL Season 4 announced for March-April8
StarCraft 2
General
Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game?
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) WardiTV Mondays $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 512 Overclocked The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth Mutation # 510 Safety Violation
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BW General Discussion Liquipedia.net NEEDS editors for Brood War
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread ZeroSpace Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Play, Watch, Drink: Esports …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2349 users

TL Health and Fitness Initiative 2011 - Page 590

Forum Index > Sports
Post a Reply
Prev 1 588 589 590 591 592 730 Next
AoN.DimSum
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States2983 Posts
September 17 2011 00:17 GMT
#11781
http://i.imgur.com/x1M9W.jpg

he was 5'6
by my idol krokkis : "U better hope Finland wont have WCG next year and that I wont gain shitloads of skill, cause then I will wash ur mouth with soap, little man."
Slithe
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States985 Posts
September 17 2011 00:18 GMT
#11782
It says in the title that he's 5'6". Given that, I would say a weight of 147 is not at all unreasonable to have a decent build.

It sounds like his routine is largely based around aesthetics, so I think it makes sense that he would want to do cardio to get that really low body fat %. Also, body shape is not exactly the best measure of strength, so I would be curious to see what his numbers actually are, as opposed to just pictures.
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 00:18 GMT
#11783
On September 17 2011 09:13 eshlow wrote:

You're asking two different questions.

Eating a lot + lifting = gaining muscle and weight in general

Eating less + cardio + light weights like he did = going to lose weight, maybe gain some muscle

These two are not nearly the same thing because you are changing multiple variables: e.g. changing diet, type of weights lifted, cardio or not, etc.

This also depends if your STARTING point is: underweight, normal weight, or obese


He was approximately normal weight, and did #2 it looks like. Now he looks shredded but I can't tell if he's underweight without his height.

If you cut caloric intake and lift heavy weights you will likely get shredded faster than what he did though.

But that's not what you're asking because you don't understand the concepts yet...

Read this:
http://www.eatmoveimprove.com/2009/08/the-relationship-between-diet-and-exercise/


Thanks for the link. It seems to give too general advice I think...

"2. You are at a “healthy weight” for your height, but want to “tone up” and gain muscle mass while losing fat.

Exercise here is the most important for any significant body composition change. Depending on the different types of exercise, your body may see fit to increase muscle mass and/or burn off excess fat mass (in conjunction with proper nutrition).

Diet is still very important because quality foods will produce faster body composition changes. This depends a lot on genetics (hence why elite athletes can generally eat crap and get away with it), but even with good body composition changes with junky food may be at the expense of overall long term health."

That's where I feel I am.

So I'm guessing the people that lift heavy and don't cut caloric intake, like the 3000+ cals people posts, are doing it not to get shredded but to just lift more?
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:29:38
September 17 2011 00:20 GMT
#11784
On September 17 2011 09:18 Slithe wrote:
It says in the title that he's 5'6". Given that, I would say a weight of 147 is not at all unreasonable to have a decent build.

It sounds like his routine is largely based around aesthetics, so I think it makes sense that he would want to do cardio to get that really low body fat %. Also, body shape is not exactly the best measure of strength, so I would be curious to see what his numbers actually are, as opposed to just pictures.


I've searched around, but I can't find any specific numbers from him. If you find any, let me know

EDIT: Hmm...you're saying that a lot of his routine is based around aesthetics. Now I'm under the impression that people who frequent this thread are looking to get healthy and fit (duh)...so does that necessarily just entail lifting heavy? I would think a lot of people would like to look good aesthetically, so wouldn't it makes sense to list advice on eating less and proper cardio for these types of people as well?
Catch
Profile Joined September 2010
United States616 Posts
September 17 2011 00:24 GMT
#11785
Box Squats
205 x 5-5-4

Close(r) stance Leg Press
180 x 10-10-10

SLDL
120 x 10-10-10

CGBP
150 x 3
135 x 5-5

Pushdown w/ Rope Pulley
110 x 10-10-10
---
So. All is dandy. The box squats kind of work my back a little more than I'm used to, and I'm not sure if that is how it is supposed to work on not. Not that it hurts, but it seems weird.Decided to replace front squats. I don't really like them, maybe I'll try something else besides the Close stance leg press. SLDL's really seem to tax my forearms when I do them (besides my glutes,hams, and lower back) which is fine by me.

CGBP is really a very mental game with me. I really need a spotter, maybe I'll even move into the squat rack like suggested, since no one uses it at my gym. Pushdowns were exquisite. lol Have a nice weekend y'all, college is about to start over hurrrrrrr too bad I got a chick so I can't have nearly as much fun.
Victory Loves Preparation
eshlow
Profile Joined June 2008
United States5210 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:31:12
September 17 2011 00:29 GMT
#11786
On September 17 2011 09:18 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:13 eshlow wrote:

You're asking two different questions.

Eating a lot + lifting = gaining muscle and weight in general

Eating less + cardio + light weights like he did = going to lose weight, maybe gain some muscle

These two are not nearly the same thing because you are changing multiple variables: e.g. changing diet, type of weights lifted, cardio or not, etc.

This also depends if your STARTING point is: underweight, normal weight, or obese


He was approximately normal weight, and did #2 it looks like. Now he looks shredded but I can't tell if he's underweight without his height.

If you cut caloric intake and lift heavy weights you will likely get shredded faster than what he did though.

But that's not what you're asking because you don't understand the concepts yet...

Read this:
http://www.eatmoveimprove.com/2009/08/the-relationship-between-diet-and-exercise/


Thanks for the link. It seems to give too general advice I think...

"2. You are at a “healthy weight” for your height, but want to “tone up” and gain muscle mass while losing fat.

Exercise here is the most important for any significant body composition change. Depending on the different types of exercise, your body may see fit to increase muscle mass and/or burn off excess fat mass (in conjunction with proper nutrition).

Diet is still very important because quality foods will produce faster body composition changes. This depends a lot on genetics (hence why elite athletes can generally eat crap and get away with it), but even with good body composition changes with junky food may be at the expense of overall long term health."

That's where I feel I am.

So I'm guessing the people that lift heavy and don't cut caloric intake, like the 3000+ cals people posts, are doing it not to get shredded but to just lift more?


It depends on what your goals are.

Gaining muscle, which is beneficial for about 99% of the sedentary population, is easier to do by eating a lot and lifting heavy.

If you are on the heavier side, it may be better to start off in a caloric deficit and lift heavy weights.

However, all of this needs to be put in context though -- most of the people that think they need to lose weight and gain muscle really just need to get bigger in general before they think about losing fat.

This includes the population that is "skinny fat" with some pudge around the abdominal area. Numerous people have come into this thread like that... and there are some here who have already done what we suggested and thank us for that.

5'6" 147 is reasonable but he would definitely look better if he added 10-15 lbs of muscle first and then cut down like he did
Overcoming Gravity: A Systematic Approach to Gymnastics and Bodyweight Strength
eshlow
Profile Joined June 2008
United States5210 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:33:36
September 17 2011 00:32 GMT
#11787
On September 17 2011 09:20 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:18 Slithe wrote:
It says in the title that he's 5'6". Given that, I would say a weight of 147 is not at all unreasonable to have a decent build.

It sounds like his routine is largely based around aesthetics, so I think it makes sense that he would want to do cardio to get that really low body fat %. Also, body shape is not exactly the best measure of strength, so I would be curious to see what his numbers actually are, as opposed to just pictures.


I've searched around, but I can't find any specific numbers from him. If you find any, let me know

EDIT: Hmm...you're saying that a lot of his routine is based around aesthetics. Now I'm under the impression that people who frequent this thread are looking to get healthy and fit (duh)...so does that necessarily just entail lifting heavy? I would think a lot of people would like to look good aesthetically, so wouldn't it makes sense to list advice on eating less and proper cardio for these types of people as well?


No.

Aesthetics is still obtained more quickly by lifting heavy first and gaining muscle mass, THEN branching out into some more a more bodybuilding type routine as an intermediate/advance lifter + cutting down with diet and cardio.

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand about this. Ignore what fitness myths you have heard about cardio and whatnot.
Overcoming Gravity: A Systematic Approach to Gymnastics and Bodyweight Strength
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 00:33 GMT
#11788
On September 17 2011 09:29 eshlow wrote:

It depends on what your goals are.

Gaining muscle, which is beneficial for about 99% of the sedentary population, is easier to do by eating a lot and lifting heavy.

If you are on the heavier side, it may be better to start off in a caloric deficit and lift heavy weights.

However, all of this needs to be put in context though -- most of the people that think they need to lose weight and gain muscle really just need to get bigger in general before they think about losing fat.

5'6" 140 something that he ended up with is reasonable I guess.... but he would look at a lot better with another 10-20 lbs of muscle on him.


Interesting, thanks. I've been browsing a lot on many different sites, and I'm still trying to convince myself that eating 3000+ cals is good. It costs me a decent amount of money to eat that much, and right now I'm barely eating 2000 cals.
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:43:00
September 17 2011 00:39 GMT
#11789
On September 17 2011 09:32 eshlow wrote:
No.

Aesthetics is still obtained more quickly by lifting heavy first and gaining muscle mass, THEN branching out into some more a more bodybuilding type routine as an intermediate/advance lifter + cutting down with diet and cardio.

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand about this. Ignore what fitness myths you have heard about cardio and whatnot.


There are no 'myths' that I've heard. I've linked you the thread where a guy eats a lot less than what's recommended here and does intense cardio. I would say that's hard evidence, not 'myth' based.

I mean here's this thread on 1 hand recommending certain things, and then that guy doing different things. You really don't see why it could be hard to understand? Your advice is on 1 end of the spectrum and what that guy did seems to be closer to the other end. That's why I'm getting confused.
AoN.DimSum
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States2983 Posts
September 17 2011 00:49 GMT
#11790
What eshlow recommends is the most effective way to gain muscle/lose weight. It doesnt mean that there arent other ways to get the same goal. There are more than one way to skin a cat.
by my idol krokkis : "U better hope Finland wont have WCG next year and that I wont gain shitloads of skill, cause then I will wash ur mouth with soap, little man."
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:54:59
September 17 2011 00:54 GMT
#11791
On September 17 2011 09:49 AoN.DimSum wrote:
What eshlow recommends is the most effective way to gain muscle/lose weight. It doesnt mean that there arent other ways to get the same goal. There are more than one way to skin a cat.


So assuming you read that reddit thread, would you say that guy could have skipped cardio entirely and had the same results? Just curious, as I'm not sure.
eshlow
Profile Joined June 2008
United States5210 Posts
September 17 2011 00:54 GMT
#11792
On September 17 2011 09:39 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:32 eshlow wrote:
No.

Aesthetics is still obtained more quickly by lifting heavy first and gaining muscle mass, THEN branching out into some more a more bodybuilding type routine as an intermediate/advance lifter + cutting down with diet and cardio.

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand about this. Ignore what fitness myths you have heard about cardio and whatnot.


There are no 'myths' that I've heard. I've linked you the thread where a guy eats a lot less than what's recommended here and does intense cardio. I would say that's hard evidence, not 'myth' based.

I mean here's this thread on 1 hand recommending certain things, and then that guy doing different things. You really don't see why it could be hard to understand? Your advice is on 1 end of the spectrum and what that guy did seems to be closer to the other end. That's why I'm getting confused.


Again,

1. He didn't do JUST cardio. He also lifted weights, albeit in the higher repetition range. As a beginner he is still going to get some hypertrophy off of it, and

2. he ate hypocalorically -- the program recommended for gaining the most muscle is to eat a lot first -- then IF you want to get more ripped you can cut down from there.

If you cannot see the difference between the recommendation made for a certain population, and what this guy did I can't help you. Additionally, just because he cut and tried to add muscle at a moderate weight does not make it evidence.

He could've improved his ability to do these things first by adding more muscle, then cutting down.

If you choose not to believe any of this and do your own thing then go for it. I hope you get the results you want.

I'm done discussing this topic. It's a waste of my time.
Overcoming Gravity: A Systematic Approach to Gymnastics and Bodyweight Strength
AoN.DimSum
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States2983 Posts
September 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#11793
On September 17 2011 09:54 HerbalTylenol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 09:49 AoN.DimSum wrote:
What eshlow recommends is the most effective way to gain muscle/lose weight. It doesnt mean that there arent other ways to get the same goal. There are more than one way to skin a cat.


So assuming you read that reddit thread, would you say that guy could have skipped cardio entirely and had the same results? Just curious, as I'm not sure.


no clue, I always felt that cardio ( jogging) was a waste of time. I only use it if I need to sweat off some weight for competitions.
by my idol krokkis : "U better hope Finland wont have WCG next year and that I wont gain shitloads of skill, cause then I will wash ur mouth with soap, little man."
Malinor
Profile Joined November 2008
Germany4733 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 01:02:51
September 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#11794
There are so many ways to skin a cat, and there are a lot of different pleasant aesthetics obtainable. This guy is shredded, but he is not jacked (at least from my understanding of those words). He would need to weight far more to be a jacked guy. He looks impressive, but he is certainly in no way big. Decaf weights 210@ 6'1 and is also shredded as fuck. If those two would stand beneath each other, it would be no contest in size.
You can go down many different roads and obtian results. You should also keep in mind that eshlow often argues mostly from a health point of view, where he views lifting heavy and eating a little bit more as better than eating less and doing cardio. If someone looks better at 150lb or 160lb is pretty much only a difference in opinion.
"Withstand. Suffer. Live as you must now live. There will, one day, be answer to this." ||| "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come."
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 01:02 GMT
#11795
On September 17 2011 09:54 eshlow wrote:

Again,

1. He didn't do JUST cardio. He also lifted weights, albeit in the higher repetition range. As a beginner he is still going to get some hypertrophy off of it, and

2. he ate hypocalorically -- the program recommended for gaining the most muscle is to eat a lot first -- then IF you want to get more ripped you can cut down from there.

If you cannot see the difference between the recommendation made for a certain population, and what this guy did I can't help you. Additionally, just because he cut and tried to add muscle at a moderate weight does not make it evidence.

He could've improved his ability to do these things first by adding more muscle, then cutting down.

If you choose not to believe any of this and do your own thing then go for it. I hope you get the results you want.

I'm done discussing this topic. It's a waste of my time.


You seem to be getting pretty mad at just explaining things. That's fine, you don't need to answer my question. Again, I'm just looking to get clarity and I'm asking questions. If you're getting pissed off at your inability to explain things clearly, then don't waste your time with it.


He could've improved his ability to do these things first by adding more muscle, then cutting down.
That's exactly what I wanted to know. Nowhere did I say I don't believe it. I just wasn't sure whether his way was more efficient or whether lifting and building first then cutting would be better.

So I'll just read up myself why adding more muscle and cutting after would be a quicker way to my goals compared to what this guy did...because asking questions here seems to get grumpy responses.
Froadac
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States6733 Posts
September 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#11796
At maximum what % should carbs make up? I think my diet is like 65% plus carbs lol.
funkie
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Venezuela9376 Posts
September 17 2011 01:04 GMT
#11797
Letter from Raul to his body

Dear body,

Thank you. Thank you always being there, even when bitches wanna bring you down, you are always there to pick me up and lift me with 120kg on my back. For 3 series of 5 reps. I sincerely admire you.

Regards,
Raul.

.
CJ Entusman #6! · Strength is the basis of athletic ability. -Rippetoe /* http://j.mp/TL-App <- TL iPhone App 2.0! */
Malinor
Profile Joined November 2008
Germany4733 Posts
September 17 2011 01:05 GMT
#11798
3am and I am wide awake, that's what I get for napping twice today, not even that Power Clean session today makes me tired at all
If only it would rain outside so I could take a nice refreshing walk.
"Withstand. Suffer. Live as you must now live. There will, one day, be answer to this." ||| "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come."
HerbalTylenol
Profile Joined September 2010
62 Posts
September 17 2011 01:07 GMT
#11799
On September 17 2011 10:01 Malinor wrote:
You should also keep in mind that eshlow often argues mostly from a health point of view, where he views lifting heavy and eating a little bit more as better than eating less and doing cardio.


Yep that's what I'm understanding from his posts. However, the only reason I've found for him advocating this is that it's generally just easier for most people to do. Easy doesn't necessarily mean most efficient or best results, though.

And if I prod him too much, which you can see above, he'll get mad : \ So it's fine, I think I have a general answer, but I'll keep reading responses from people.
Malinor
Profile Joined November 2008
Germany4733 Posts
September 17 2011 01:07 GMT
#11800
On September 17 2011 10:03 Froadac wrote:
At maximum what % should carbs make up? I think my diet is like 65% plus carbs lol.


Doesn't matter for you, you need to eat, or do you want to be mistaken for a freshman again?
But eshlow would probably recommend something like 40%-50% max, but less if possible, if I had to take a wild guess.
"Withstand. Suffer. Live as you must now live. There will, one day, be answer to this." ||| "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come."
Prev 1 588 589 590 591 592 730 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 51m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech140
StarCraft: Brood War
BeSt 1089
PianO 167
Larva 84
Sharp 46
Sea.KH 42
ZergMaN 35
Shuttle 32
NaDa 31
Bale 13
sSak 9
[ Show more ]
Icarus 8
Dota 2
XaKoH 245
NeuroSwarm157
League of Legends
JimRising 754
C9.Mang0410
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King109
Other Games
summit1g6795
KnowMe434
Tasteless310
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick732
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 71
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH280
• practicex 83
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra1510
• Rush973
• Stunt659
• HappyZerGling105
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2h 51m
LiuLi Cup
3h 51m
Reynor vs Creator
Maru vs Lambo
PiGosaur Monday
17h 51m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
LiuLi Cup
1d 3h
Clem vs Rogue
SHIN vs Cyan
Replay Cast
1d 16h
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Scarlett vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs herO
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
3 days
LiuLi Cup
3 days
Serral vs Zoun
Cure vs Classic
RSL Revival
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-09
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.