| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:26 [PkF] Wire wrote: I don't even know why this exists in the first place. A gateway based PvP would probably be extremely exciting, why did they need to promote disruptor play that much ? cuz gateways are too much like Terran, y'know | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:26 CosmicSpiral wrote: This is nothing like Dragoon/Reaver, which required actual finesse to win. Yeah, this is just totally random, am I right!? | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16849 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:24 Mozdk wrote: He is saying that something can be fun to watch, but that doesn't make it a good part of a strategy game. If it's too volatile and based on a lot of luck. PvP definatly seems like a MU where far greater comebacks can be seen now. Than ever before. (I'm not saying that I agree with his statement. Just explaining. yeah i didn't want to read into his comment without him explaining. I disagree with him. I don't think it's that volatile considering people will learn how to play vs them etc. | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
Fran_
United States1024 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:21 Wildmoon wrote: Colossus is a very snowbally unit. You have a few more than your opponent and you gain huge advantage. You can even push those advantage further because colossi have no cooldown. Disruptors can always stage a comeback with a right shot. Which in my opinion makes it a bit too coinflippy. | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:28 Makro wrote: you mean the pop out feature of the twitch's app ? Yeah how long has thar been there wowie | ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:28 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Does the star allow you into a secret society that TL probably has Yeah, we get free booze and get to gossip about all the other TL users | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:28 SmykuToronto wrote: Locust couldn't blow up half of your opponent's army within a second. This thing is more tense. Tense isn't fun in and of itself nor is it the opposite of boredom | ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:27 HellHound wrote: Zealot archon immortal vs zealot archon immortal is literrally the most a move game possible rofl You are right. This is not what we want. Just flipping a coin. | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:29 Lorning wrote: So just like any other jobYeah, we get free booze and get to gossip about all the other TL users | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:29 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Yeah how long has thar been there wowie dunno, but that's useful for me so i can check twitter while watching a stream haha world best feature ever oF ALL TIME | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:25 KingofdaHipHop wrote: sOs beat PartinG when he was down like 4 colossi because of a superior fight tho, I don't think the advantage is as clear as you make it. Most of the time it is. Something like that can only happen when both have really high number of colossi. Not gonna happen with 1 vs 5 colossi. | ||
|
HeroMystic
United States1217 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:28 WrathSCII wrote: That was different because Reavers were much better than Disruptors for one reason THE SCARAB ITSELF DID NOT GO THROUGH UNITS! That is what made the Reaver much better unit, you can actually micro the targeted unit away, not keep blinking to survive because splitting is pointless. This is a good point. If the Disruptor ball didn't phase through units it'd be a lot more balanced while having the same effect. | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:30 Wildmoon wrote: Most of the time it is. Something like that can only happen when both have really high number of colossi. Not gonna happen with 3 vs 8 colossi. | ||
|
highsis
259 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:27 HellHound wrote: Zealot archon immortal vs zealot archon immortal is literrally the most a move game possible rofl No, you must not have watched any of those games. Positioning matters and defenders have an advantage. It's colossus fight that number determines everything. | ||
|
HellHound
Bulgaria5962 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:29 Mozdk wrote: You are right. This is not what we want. Just flipping a coin. There is skill in it like in anything else it's just not interesting  Much like (actually exactly like) Roach vs Roach | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
It's anticlimatic People compared it to Baneling wars in zvz, but in zvz there are actual trades happening. What we saw in the pvp was mostly stalkers/tempests shooting at each other while disruptors deny an actual engagement. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16103 Posts
| ||
|
Fran_
United States1024 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:28 SmykuToronto wrote: Locust couldn't blow up half of your opponent's army within a second. This thing is more tense. So tense that I had to shake up to wake up a few times: 10 minutes of waiting for a big shot that could not be capitalized. So intense. | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16849 Posts
On November 29 2015 03:26 CosmicSpiral wrote: This is nothing like Dragoon/Reaver, which required actual finesse to win. Right now Stalker/Disruptor is ridiculous in terms of how forgiving it is (how many times did we see 15-25 supply evaporate and it had no effect because the numerically superior army could not capitalize?) and how little commitment Disruptors require to pay off. Constant sharking in itself is not interesting to me personally. Yeah no what the fuck you couldn't capitalize as quickly as you think even if you got a few dragoons since reavers were still dangerous. The thing that could make it more like dragoon reaver is a reduction of movement speed on the disruptor so you would need stuff like the warp prism or something. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
AI Arena Tournament
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
