EPT[DreamHack] Stockholm D2 2013 - Page 474
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
JayJay_90
Germany1632 Posts
| ||
|
Snoodles
401 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:17 rift wrote: (1862) Leenock 2-1 NaNiwa (1476) I believe! | ||
|
Mouzone
3937 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:18 Cereb wrote: It's impossible to measure how many more times ZvP is better in HotS than WoL! Loving this!  Can't even remember the last time I saw a BL - infestor composition. | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:17 sitromit wrote: I would say you're delusional if you think their skill is remotely close. They are both extremely skilled. Leenock is a stronger player atm I would say. Leenock is in a better practice environment. Life takes em both down. | ||
|
arkedos
Germany1426 Posts
| ||
|
mec
Sweden192 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:17 Die4Ever wrote: Naniwa lost like 5 phoenixes for no reason in the early game lol I would say this is the reason he lost. This was why leenock made mutas in the first place and forced naniwa to remake those phoenixes again | ||
|
AstroPegnuin
293 Posts
| ||
|
purakushi
United States3301 Posts
3-1 gogo | ||
|
Lunareste
United States3596 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:16 Wintex wrote: I like valks and corsairs way more than vikings and phoenixes. Those hard counters help the overall game. I fucking love Corsairs<3 favorite starcraft unit | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:17 Die4Ever wrote: Naniwa lost like 5 phoenixes for no reason in the early game lol He said no mistakes man, why you gotta re-write history to be accurate? | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:16 freetgy wrote: nope it showed that even with Phoenix Range, PHoenix suck vs. mass Mutas No, they don't, you just can't make 10 Phoenixes and expect to win vs. 40 Mutas. Mutas didn't win for Leenock, superior economy did, he could've constantly keep remaxing on Ultras/Infestors/Vipers and Hydras and still win. He had 7 bases, Naniwa had like 3-4, if he had more bases, just 10 Phoenixes mixed in with a lot of Archons, and those Mutas wouldn't be able to engage those units. | ||
|
Tao367
United Kingdom324 Posts
| ||
|
DigitalisDestructi
United States488 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:13 Relaaja wrote: Zero mistakes. Protoss just have to play so much better to win zerg. Losing 4 (5?) phoenixes for free doesn't count as a mistake, I guess. | ||
|
Loxley
Netherlands2480 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:19 JayJay_90 wrote: I haven't seen that much HOTS before this DH, but I've heard a lot of Zergs complain about skytoss being unbeatable. I can't think of a game where I have seen anything like that though. What is this infamous skytoss? PHoenix, voidrays, tempest and potentially carriers. But the first 3 will do just fine. | ||
|
ProbeEtPylon
168 Posts
# | ||
|
SibChil
Sweden502 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:18 Azurues wrote: this early hive - get ultra + zerglings to push protoss is it gonna be the meta of ZvP? i am loving these builts. and yes HoTs so much better than WoL already Definately gonna try to copy that on the ladder from now on | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
lol I think I can solve this. Life and Leenock are still go-to guys when it comes to Zerg. Mystery solved. | ||
|
Kontys
Finland659 Posts
| ||
|
Absentia
United Kingdom973 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:17 Hassybaby wrote: I totally agree that 6-7 phoenix should be totally able to take on a cloud of 30+ mutas Totally One of the issues, though, is that if you commit too much to phoenix, you're going to get stomped by a by a 40+ larva tech switch. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On April 28 2013 07:19 Wintex wrote: They are both extremely skilled. Leenock is a stronger play atm I would say. Leenock is in a better practice environment. Life takes em both down. Life and Leenock trade fairly evenly whenever they meet | ||
| ||
