EPT[Up/Down] Group A 2013 GSL Season 1 - Page 147
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Parcelleus
Australia1662 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPie
United States42 Posts
Code A has a ro48,ro32, ro24. People who get past the ro24 get into Code S. If they lose in ro32/ro24 they go into the Up&Downs. If you lose in ro48 youre knocked out of code A. | ||
|
NicksonReyes
Philippines4431 Posts
Quoting my post earlier: On January 06 2013 21:07 NicksonReyes wrote: I'm a Flash fanboy. I've lived my whole life watching Flash play greedy, lose when punished and win when not. EDIT: There goes my 3,000th post. | ||
|
LighT.
Canada4501 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:32 isaachukfan wrote: Itt: flash fanboys getting butthurt that thier god lost. The fact is.. he should have made it. Yes, I am a Flash fan so obviously my opinions are going to biased however, the way he beat Vampire/Yonghwa as if they were nothing. I have strong belief if he just played safe against MC; he would have likely pulled it off; or better an extremely good match. Flash/MC micro seem to be on par, from the OSL/GSL games, with Flash's macro being better, MC being more strategic. he just pulled off a bisu and ended up with massive damage from pressure but still ended up with the same record as MC but didnt go through thats the frustrating part of it all. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9173 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:33 Parcelleus wrote: I agree BO1 is a bit shit, but the format is fair IMHO. You get to play 5 games to determine if you go through. You beat the best player in the group, tie for 2nd best record and come 4th... awesome system | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:33 Parcelleus wrote: I agree BO1 is a bit shit, but the format is fair IMHO. You get to play 5 games to determine if you go through. It's fair in the way that everyone has an equal chance, but I think playing tiebreakers if you have 3 players at equal records is better than head to head, and less random. anyway I'm done ranting on this off to bed ;d | ||
|
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 Scarecrow wrote: You beat the best player in the group, tie for 2nd best record and come 4th... awesome system Doesn't matter who you beat. It's about how many people you beat. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18636 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 Scarecrow wrote: You beat the best player in the group, tie for 2nd best record and come 4th... awesome system You also play the best player in the group after he has qualified --> he doesn't care one thing about the outcome If anything Flash was lucky he played Yoda last. | ||
|
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 LighT. wrote: The fact is.. he should have made it. Yes, I am a Flash fan so obviously my opinions are going to biased however, the way he beat Vampire/Yonghwa as if they were nothing. I have strong belief if he just played safe against MC; he would have likely pulled it off; or better an extremely good match. Flash/MC micro seem to be on par, from the OSL/GSL games, with Flash's macro being better, MC being more strategic. he just pulled off a bisu and ended up with massive damage from pressure but still ended up with the same record as MC but didnt go through thats the frustrating part of it all. Sometimes your player just loses... Everyone goes in knowing how the format works, whining afterwards makes no sense at all. Let it go! | ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 Scarecrow wrote: You beat the best player in the group, tie for 2nd best record and come 4th... awesome system Because you failed to beat the other players who are tied with you. | ||
|
okum
France5779 Posts
| ||
739
Bearded Elder29904 Posts
| ||
|
NicksonReyes
Philippines4431 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:38 Assirra wrote: Doesn't matter who you beat. It's about how many people you beat. Doesn't matter how many people you beat. It's about who you beat. Flash, JD and MC all beat 3 guys. MC beat both so he wins. Flash lost to both so he's out. I'm obviously not complaining about the format. Just saying that "Doesn't matter who you beat. It's about how many people you beat." is plain wrong. | ||
|
Elite_
United States4259 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 Scarecrow wrote: You beat the best player in the group, tie for 2nd best record and come 4th... awesome system Even better, you lose to the two people that you tie with and your fans cry about you coming in 4th place because you lost head to head against the two players you tie with. Amazing system IMO. | ||
|
Taefox
1533 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:14 Scarecrow wrote: But it's not like the teams involved train together daily. MC vs Yonghwa should never have been the last game But we would never know Yonghwa was going to be 0 - 4 before the match, same as Flash case. If he was 3-1 or 4-0 before playing against YoDa. All matchs scheduled and hadn't been changed. | ||
|
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
| ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 LighT. wrote: The fact is.. he should have made it. Yes, I am a Flash fan so obviously my opinions are going to biased however, the way he beat Vampire/Yonghwa as if they were nothing. I have strong belief if he just played safe against MC; he would have likely pulled it off; or better an extremely good match. Flash/MC micro seem to be on par, from the OSL/GSL games, with Flash's macro being better, MC being more strategic. he just pulled off a bisu and ended up with massive damage from pressure but still ended up with the same record as MC but didnt go through thats the frustrating part of it all. That is like saying Squirtle should have won Season 2 if his stalkers didn't get caught. Or Yellow should have won OSL if he defended the bunker rushes. Hell, Yoda would have won if he just kept making marines and attacked Flash instead of letting Flash tech and expand before him in their game. Fact is, players take risks and sometimes they get burned for it. But if they didn't take any risk ever, they would be playing from behind in every game against players who take risks. | ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 Scarecrow wrote: You beat the best player in the group, tie for 2nd best record and come 4th... awesome system wait... are you SERIOUSLY complaining about place behind people you lost to??! | ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:42 NicksonReyes wrote: Doesn't matter how many people you beat. It's about who you beat. Flash, JD and MC all beat 3 guys. MC beat both so he wins. Flash lost to both so he's out. I'm obviously not complaining about the format. Just saying that "Doesn't matter who you beat. It's about how many people you beat." is plain wrong. Heh, funny thing is. It is actually about who you beat. If Flash lost to Yoda but beat MC, there would have been tiebreakers. Or if he beat JD, he would have been 3rd and gone to wild cards. But again, the format is known for everyone and H2H is one of the most common tiebreakers in competitions (sports, chess, etc). And next time, it might be Flash that goes through because of it. | ||
|
Muffloe
Sweden6061 Posts
On January 06 2013 23:36 Scarecrow wrote: You beat the best player in the group, tie for 2nd best record and come 4th... awesome system I am usually not on my acc when on this site, but all this fanboyism made me log on to have a chance to stand up to this. Flash lost in a fair system, but that doesn't necessarily mean that he is bad. So just drop this fanboyism right now, because you will most likely feel better if you don't feel a need to blame a totally fair system for being shit just because your greedy hero didn't make it. | ||
| ||
