MLG Statement on Naniwa vs. Nestea - Page 7

On November 21 2011 02:33 daliLlama wrote:
Ok, i guess we just dont se things the same way and there isnt much we can do about that i guess so GG.

Why is the change log importat though?

On November 21 2011 02:33 mvtaylor wrote:


Because literally NO ONE had a problem understanding that webapge until naniwa so they saw no need to change it as every other competitor in every other MLG had managed to understand the rules? Why would they change the webpage from yesterday to today?

They might change it before the first 2012 event, let's call it naniwa's law

On November 21 2011 02:36 RockIronrod wrote:

You don't think that a specific outlining of all the changes over time to the map pool is important?

On November 21 2011 02:41 daliLlama wrote:


Im not trying to make a point, im actually asking. Why is it important?

But no, i dont really think its important, unless im just missing something?

On November 21 2011 02:43 diophan wrote:


Watching people's replays where their build seems silly from a couple MLGs ago but you realize they had it specifically for cross positions Shakuras, or if you're confused why someone is scouting a certain way and trying to figure out why, and then you look at the changelog and realize only certain spawns were possible. Plus it's of general interest to see the evolution of the map pool.

Plus basically everything related to software includes a changelog somewhere.

On November 21 2011 01:12 kmkg wrote:



GSL forbids every kind of replay watching in between matches.

On November 21 2011 02:36 MLG_Adam wrote:
By the way, anyone with MLG rank points will be drafted into our invasion militia.

Can we stop with the change log nonsense and discuss impending occupation of a foreign nation?

On November 21 2011 02:46 Fandango wrote:


Ha, trying to divert attention from the actual drama in order to focus on some crackpot's bizarre conspiracy theory?

Well played MLG, well played. I don't know what your real plan is but for damn sure it's not got anything to do with Sweden or investors from Macau and nothing to do with this tournament. The game is afoot and the starting pistol has rang its final bell, let the dogs of war begin!

On November 21 2011 02:48 MLG_Adam wrote:



You're good; a worthy adversary.

Confusion is one of the key tenants of the Art of War.

On November 21 2011 02:53 Let it Raine wrote:
the real drama should be around the lack of replays!

is it even possible to mess with the accounts somehow found by the replay data with the new privacy settings?

so many nestea games i'd like to watch over a 1000x >_<

On November 21 2011 01:00 MLG_Adam wrote:
After extensive investigation, review of the video files and 2011 Pro Circuit rules, we have determined that the replay had no impact on the tournament flow or the match results. Build orders are displayed at the end of a match on the stats screen. So the replay that was viewed would have revealed nothing the match stats page would not have revealed otherwise.

The admin didn't tell him that, I know because I was standing right there. Why wouldn't a player playing in a National Championship know where the spawns were? He chose the map, it is his responsibility to know the intricacies involved.

On November 21 2011 04:21 Swagasaurus wrote:


Are you kidding me? Just because you determined that the replay didn't have an effect on the match doesn't mean it's ok that Naniwa broke the rules. This is ridiculous.



Why would Naniwa blatantly LIE and PAUSE the game if an admin hadn't told him that? The whole story seemed very fishy, like MLG was trying to cover their asses.

On November 21 2011 04:21 Swagasaurus wrote:


Are you kidding me? Just because you determined that the replay didn't have an effect on the match doesn't mean it's ok that Naniwa broke the rules. This is ridiculous.



Why would Naniwa blatantly LIE and PAUSE the game if an admin hadn't told him that? The whole story seemed very fishy, like MLG was trying to cover their asses.