EPT[TvsP] Lillekanin 2rax + 1fac All in build - Page 5
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
|
Cortza
South Africa328 Posts
| ||
|
Redrot
United States446 Posts
get out plagiarizer. | ||
|
EnPo
Finland411 Posts
If you guys go full drama on one name on some build that may work on ladder, but propably will never get used on high scale tournament that is watched by 50 000+ people and even then casters propably don't say that "omg it is build by Lillekanin" maybe just say that it is 2rax i factory build. This has been happening all the time... people have took some build they have used and maybe someone else and may have put their name on TL thread, and nobody gave a shit.. Did anyone of you gave enough shits to make huge drama when you told a joke to your friedn and then the friend told that to rest of the people. I don't think that you did... Mature up please. | ||
|
MattMannion
United States25 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 261926
960 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:30 MattMannion wrote: seriously though, just take the advice in the thread and use it or not. if you don't like it or something about it, then ignore it. the only thing you guys know how to do in the sc2 community is make small thing into large things via bitching. as the man said about me, mature up. Sorry, one is not mature because he lets bad acts slip. Get off your low horse. | ||
|
B-rye88
Canada168 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:49 Karpfen wrote: Sorry, one is not mature because he lets bad acts slip. Get off your low horse. An aspect of maturity IS letting insignificant things slide however. This pretty much represents the definition of insignificant, as neither the 'aggriever' or the 'aggrieved' stands to benefit in any meaningful way from 'winning'. | ||
|
MattMannion
United States25 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:49 Karpfen wrote: Sorry, one is not mature because he lets bad acts slip. Get off your low horse. did you make that one up? its clever. | ||
|
Deleted User 261926
960 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:57 B-rye88 wrote: An aspect of maturity IS letting insignificant things slide however. This pretty much represents the definition of insignificant, as neither the 'aggriever' or the 'aggrieved' stands to benefit in any meaningful way from 'winning'. If you were to create a build that actually works and someone copied it from you and called it his, would you be happy about that? Would you not discuss? Would you just let such asshole move slip? Somehow people seem to think that having no backbone is maturity. | ||
|
agahamsorr0w
Netherlands359 Posts
On May 07 2014 18:22 Karpfen wrote: If you were to create a build that actually works and someone copied it from you and called it his, would you be happy about that? Would you not discuss? Would you just let such asshole move slip? Somehow people seem to think that having no backbone is maturity. I agree with this. You should never let ppl walk over you. | ||
|
Embir
Poland567 Posts
This thread ephitomizes what is wrong with many SC2 community members. | ||
|
Ctone23
United States1839 Posts
On May 07 2014 18:22 Karpfen wrote: If you were to create a build that actually works and someone copied it from you and called it his, would you be happy about that? Would you not discuss? Would you just let such asshole move slip? Somehow people seem to think that having no backbone is maturity. 2 rax 1 factory goes all the way back to 2010. So what if someone discussed a form of the build. You can't seriously think that one person who claims to own this build is seriously wronged by this thread. He is simply trying to give struggling Terrans a build order they may of not heard of. To think that some guy named FrozenImpact created this build and all credit should be given to him is just silly and ridiculous. I played SC2 for a year and a half before I even heard of Team Liquid or Reddit, and I can promise you I tried to do a 2 rax, 1 factory build. Are you saying that I too stole someones idea? When I had no chance of knowing someone was claiming it? Do you see how silly this is? Grow up. | ||
|
aaycumi
England265 Posts
A few ideas to throw around: 1). Make Marines until you have scouted no stargate > switch to reactor Mines? 2). Two Marauder production with Shells would require two Refineries. 3). The usual one base follow-up to any one base is 3/1/1 timing attack with 2-3 Siege Tanks. The idea with a Minefield should be to camp Protoss's Gateways, etc. making it impossible to build units, Mines take too long to produce to make the proxy worth it so if you are proxying I recommend Marauders at the front with Bunkers and Hellions in Protoss base. WoL standard. On May 07 2014 22:43 Ctone23 wrote: 2 rax 1 factory goes all the way back to 2010. So what if someone discussed a form of the build. You can't seriously think that one person who claims to own this build is seriously wronged by this thread. He is simply trying to give struggling Terrans a build order they may of not heard of. To think that some guy named FrozenImpact created this build and all credit should be given to him is just silly and ridiculous. I played SC2 for a year and a half before I even heard of Team Liquid or Reddit, and I can promise you I tried to do a 2 rax, 1 factory build. Are you saying that I too stole someones idea? When I had no chance of knowing someone was claiming it? Do you see how silly this is? Grow up. If I remember right, I think it was HopeTorture/IntotheRainbow, who came up with this build and made Banshee openings standard in TvT. But that was AGES ago, NEWFLASH, almost every idea in SC comes from the casual scene and develops in the Professional scene into workable ideas, see the first proper build in WoL was the Zatic build and see how that looked when it first came out, first season Stimpack rush is standard TvP. Meh | ||
|
DeadByDawn
United Kingdom476 Posts
We should name it after him, we could say that you have just been Karpfenned. But seriously, is the build any good? What are peoples experience with it? And has anyone complained that he put [TvsP] in the title - who the hell says it that way - its TvP - noob  | ||
|
B-rye88
Canada168 Posts
On May 07 2014 18:22 Karpfen wrote: If you were to create a build that actually works and someone copied it from you and called it his, would you be happy about that? Would you not discuss? Would you just let such asshole move slip? Somehow people seem to think that having no backbone is maturity. Would I let the move slip? Yeap. Because neither frozen nor liillekanin will ever get anything out of this but self-importance and e-fame among perhaps 1,000 people. Woop-de-fucking doo. It's of absolutely zero-import, and the people blowing it up are small-minded, inflammatory, and not worthy of attention. | ||
|
MattMannion
United States25 Posts
| ||
|
Ctone23
United States1839 Posts
On May 08 2014 03:04 DeadByDawn wrote: We should name it after him, we could say that you have just been Karpfenned. But seriously, is the build any good? What are peoples experience with it? And has anyone complained that he put [TvsP] in the title - who the hell says it that way - its TvP - noob Yea it's a good option vs Protoss. It's timing specific so I would recommend watching the vod he linked. Things like supply block will kill this build entirely. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
[2 lines about how good the build is.] [link to VOD on OPs twitch] [link to OPs twitch channel] [link to OPs facebook] [link to OPs twitter] [List of BO up to 21 supply, with OPs name as title] [31 words (yes I counted them  ) about what to do after 21 supply][Bashing other guy] [Another paragraph bashing other guy] It is great if you want to do great guides, help people and gain followers that way. But you put almost no effort at all into the guide and spam your name and links all over, taking a lot more space than the build itself. Independently of any childish fights for intellectual rights, the OP isn't really up to scratch for TL strategy guide, and is probably quite a bit to much self-advertisement for a relatively new poster. I'm a bit surprised that it is still open actually.  So if you want people to actually get a good impression of you, I'd recommend removing all the self-advertisement and flesh out the guide A LOT. What is the purpose of the build? What levels is it good at? When can I do it? What maps is it good at? How should I react to the toss build? How can/should the toss react? How can I counter follow-ups the toss can make? What parts are the most important in execution? etc. As a team player (at looow level), and I know you are too, I'd also be interested how this works in 2v2 or 3v3. What to do differently, etc. Then, if you do that properly (and only then!) you can put a short(!) note at the end that you'd be happy if people checked out your stream. Maybe even give some credit to your ex-friend for "valuable discussion", who knows? Or, you can continue to fight a childish fight about who made exactly what minor changes and follow-ups to an archaeological build. Choice is yours. hfhf. | ||
|
Ctone23
United States1839 Posts
On May 08 2014 22:58 Cascade wrote: [Banner with OPs name on. Nothing else.] [2 lines about how good the build is.] [link to VOD on OPs twitch] [link to OPs twitch channel] [link to OPs facebook] [link to OPs twitter] [List of BO up to 21 supply, with OPs name as title] [31 words (yes I counted them ) about what to do after 21 supply][Bashing other guy] [Another paragraph bashing other guy] It is great if you want to do great guides, help people and gain followers that way. But you put almost no effort at all into the guide and spam your name and links all over, taking a lot more space than the build itself. Independently of any childish fights for intellectual rights, the OP isn't really up to scratch for TL strategy guide, and is probably quite a bit to much self-advertisement for a relatively new poster. I'm a bit surprised that it is still open actually. So if you want people to actually get a good impression of you, I'd recommend removing all the self-advertisement and flesh out the guide A LOT. What is the purpose of the build? What levels is it good at? When can I do it? What maps is it good at? How should I react to the toss build? How can/should the toss react? How can I counter follow-ups the toss can make? What parts are the most important in execution? etc. As a team player (at looow level), and I know you are too, I'd also be interested how this works in 2v2 or 3v3. What to do differently, etc. Then, if you do that properly (and only then!) you can put a short(!) note at the end that you'd be happy if people checked out your stream. Maybe even give some credit to your ex-friend for "valuable discussion", who knows? Or, you can continue to fight a childish fight about who made exactly what minor changes and follow-ups to an archaeological build. Choice is yours. hfhf.So many condescending 's I could throw up. | ||
|
SatedSC2
England3012 Posts
| ||
| ||
