EPT[TvsP] Lillekanin 2rax + 1fac All in build - Page 3
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
|
SatedSC2
England3012 Posts
| ||
|
Gianttt
Netherlands194 Posts
On April 30 2014 06:15 AiLillekanin wrote: I took the OPENING from WoL (2rax) combined with FrozenImpact proxy factory idea. I found out quickly that yes u can kill the Protoss expo 90% of the times, but you didnt end the game. So i follow MY ALL IN build up with a 4 rax scv allin on 2 base. Do you even read? You could have atleast put his name in your story, that's what he is telling you. So yes he can read. | ||
|
Lillekanin
Denmark192 Posts
On April 30 2014 22:29 Gianttt wrote: You could have atleast put his name in your story, that's what he is telling you. So yes he can read. "I took the OPENING from WoL (2rax) combined with FrozenImpact proxy factory idea" | ||
|
Lillekanin
Denmark192 Posts
| ||
|
watchlulu
Germany475 Posts
On April 30 2014 21:22 agahamsorr0w wrote: A tvt showmatch with a tvp build. Good logic here. Yeah I thought I would stick to the thread because everything in here is absolutely logical. | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
| ||
|
11cc
Finland561 Posts
On April 30 2014 22:54 nkr wrote: Why should he give any credit to the other dude? He never gave lillekanin any replay or in any way helped lillekanin. Since lillekanin had no replay, all he did he came up with himself. Yes he based it off what this other dude did but I don't see how that matters in this case. Well if I saw Zest do an awesome build and wrote a guide about it, I would definitely feel weird to not mention that Zest did it, and even naming the build after myself, even if Zest never sent me a replay or even knew of my excistence | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On April 30 2014 23:10 11cc wrote: Well if I saw Zest do an awesome build and wrote a guide about it, I would definitely feel weird to not mention that Zest did it, and even naming the build after myself, even if Zest never sent me a replay or even knew of my excistence dunno, if you can write a guide about someone elses build by just knowing that he opens with 2 rax, you gotta be one great mind reader  | ||
|
KalinovSC2
52 Posts
On April 30 2014 22:54 nkr wrote: Why should he give any credit to the other dude? He never gave lillekanin any replay or in any way helped lillekanin. Since lillekanin had no replay, all he did he came up with himself. Yes he based it off what this other dude did but I don't see how that matters in this case. Well, he didn't really come up with anything himself to start. He stalked match history and got a replay from the other guy to get the initial build order, then added a different transition (If I understand correctly). It seems quite silly to try to brand your name to a build, as stated in a previous comments. If you have a unique style / way of playing a build that is highly successful, generally people will associate you with that build / style (I.E PartinGs immortal sentry). Trying to copyright an opener that has been around since WoL, even with a unique transition, seems quite unnecessary. The way this guide is written and the timing it was posted makes me feel it was far from a guide you wrote to try to add content to the community, but rather a way to try self promote or somehow try to "copyright" this build. On April 30 2014 05:51 AiLillekanin wrote: Wow since when does bulds have copyright rofl This is EXACTLY what you are trying to do :/ | ||
|
SpawnMoarOverlords
400 Posts
| ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On April 30 2014 23:20 KalinovSC2 wrote: Well, he didn't really come up with anything himself to start. He stalked match history and got a replay from the other guy to get the initial build order, then added a different transition (If I understand correctly). It seems quite silly to try to brand your name to a build, as stated in a previous comments. If you have a unique style / way of playing a build that is highly successful, generally people will associate you with that build / style (I.E PartinGs immortal sentry). Trying to copyright an opener that has been around since WoL, even with a unique transition, seems quite unnecessary. The way this guide is written and the timing it was posted makes me feel it was far from a guide you wrote to try to add content to the community, but rather a way to try self promote or somehow try to "copyright" this build. This is EXACTLY what you are trying to do :/ what? he wrote a guide for a build, a guide that noone else wrote nor helped him to write. He did all the work himself. If you have a similar build with the same opening, of which lillekanin based his build and guide: tough shit. Maybe if you weren't such a dick about it, he WOULD have credited you. | ||
|
KalinovSC2
52 Posts
On April 30 2014 23:44 nkr wrote: what? he wrote a guide for a build, a guide that noone else wrote nor helped him to write. He did all the work himself. If you have a similar build with the same opening, of which lillekanin based his build and guide: tough shit. Maybe if you weren't such a dick about it, he WOULD have credited you. Okay so first off I'm not involved. This is my take of the situation after reading the threads regarding this situation. My whole point was it seems silly to try to "copyright" a build in general. | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9405 Posts
On April 30 2014 22:42 AiLillekanin wrote: He never gave me the buildorder (according to the Redditthread - Skypelog), so basically he deserves no naming on this build. He didnt give replays as he's mentioning but i simply looked at the match history screen and looked at BO and did my own version. But skypelog was photoshopped, right? At least that's what you wrote in the reddit thread. | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25883 Posts
| ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On April 30 2014 23:54 KalinovSC2 wrote: Okay so first off I'm not involved. This is my take of the situation after reading the threads regarding this situation. My whole point was it seems silly to try to "copyright" a build in general. when i say "you" i don't mean you specifically, it's more a way of speaking | ||
|
GodOfWarAReS
Germany105 Posts
If every low-mid gm player would claim a build his own because he makes little adjustments to the build, we would litterally have thousands of builds named after players. | ||
|
Lillekanin
Denmark192 Posts
. And why is it even a problem to put my name infront of the build? Since i wrote down the BO, and i made a VOD and i made the thread to share it with you guys.So there should be no problem with me putting my name infront of the build since it's my guide. | ||
|
KalinovSC2
52 Posts
On May 01 2014 01:32 AiLillekanin wrote: I never claimed the build to me MINE. I just wrote "Player name Content". To even sort it out, i wrote "Lillekanin version of the 2 rax + 1 fac build". . And why is it even a problem to put my name infront of the build? Since i wrote down the BO, and i made a VOD and i made the thread to share it with you guys.So there should be no problem with me putting my name infront of the build since it's my guide. The ESEX article summed this up perfectly. | ||
|
Lillekanin
Denmark192 Posts
So make Justice plz. | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25883 Posts
Here in case people are wondering what he's referring to | ||
| ||
