• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:30
CEST 14:30
KST 21:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 33074 users

[G] DRG's Roach/Ling/Bane "All-in" (Or is it?) - Page 5

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
GleaM
Profile Joined June 2011
United States207 Posts
June 19 2012 04:55 GMT
#81
On June 16 2012 22:38 TangSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 16 2012 02:40 GleaM wrote:
If someone can post to me a pro game where the attack does no damage and the Z can still transition and win, without like a completely ridiculous blunder, I will change my opinion. As of now, however, there can be very little debate that this is all-in.

Building a nexus after 4gating PvZ or PvT doesn't mean that the 4gate isn't all-in. Building the nexus isn't a "transition"

Hmm I don't think the 4gate analogy is a good one for the roach/ling/baneling. Usually a 4-gate is around 19-22 workers with 1 base, this is 2 base with about 35-38 workers and 2 gas (easily enough income to take a 3rd and continue droning with upgrades). Generally speaking, the bust has to do some pretty significant damage but the sheer size of it is almost enough to guarantee you do at least equalizing damage. You're stating the worst case scenario (that the attack somehow does no damage) proves that the build is all-in, but the definition of an all-in is not "an attack that must do damage to stay even," since most attacks fall into this category.



Zerg operates differently from other races with this all-in for 2 reasons. One is that you're building units and not drones, which means that you are taking an active role in sacrificing economy for army. That is why early zerg attacks need to do damage, because you are cutting workers to execute the push. Also, you are using a unit that detonates when it attacks, so you need to follow that unit up with many many more units, which is costing more larvae, more gas, and cutting more workers.

Furthermore, you are staying on hatchery tech, which is completely stunting your upgrades and later game tech.

Let's paint a scenario here: Terran player on daybreak goes for standard 3 OC play into marine-tank. The high level player will, at 9 minutes, have 2 or 3 tanks in seige mode, at least one bunker, a partial or full supply depot wall, and many marines.This is with no scouting necessary. This is just the simple progression and idea behind the build. (One of the main builds at the moment, being used by the majority of the GSL/GSTL terrans, where they get a fast 3 OC, double ebay, tanks, then go into crazy marine/tank/medivac mode) All of that was without scouting. With proper scouting you could be facing more bunkers and a better defense. So a 3 OC terran can either choose to take a 3rd with a significant worker lead because they did not cut workers with their unit production, or they could keep their 3rd oc in their base and begin to push as the Z is putting up his 3rd on hatch tech, in which case the zerg is fighting marines and tanks and 2 medivacs by around 10 minutes with 1-1 and stim with speedlings, slow banelings, and roaches, with little to no creep spread (2 queens injecting and MAYBE a 3rd queen, only with Stephano's style)50 drones at the most (assuming the inject cycle after the tanks are scouted by the push) and 3 hatches (assuming the 3rd is finished) with 2 of them being injected (unless the 3rd queen in stephano's style leaves creep duty and ambles her way back there)

I don't see any way to win a game from this spot as zerg, unless the terran player completely messes something up horribly badly and loses an army for nothing or his mouse dies or something.

My point is this: Standard terran play, even with no scouting, can make this push do zero damage. And if the push doeszero damage, it is virtually impossible, for the explained reason, to transition OUT of the all-in.

I will say this again: Any thoughts on this situation? And does anyone have replays of this build doing little/no damage and still being able to transition into a stable midgame with no complete blunders by the terran player?
GleaM
Profile Joined June 2011
United States207 Posts
June 19 2012 05:01 GMT
#82
And at the 4gate comment:

As a protoss, after the first warp-in of stalkers around 6 minutes, I can throw down a nexus and have around 60% chrono for probes, and have this at the 6 minute mark, which is pretty similar comparatively with the timings discussed with the roach/ling/baneling all-in. If I use the build, however, and the stalkers do no damage, the only way that a standard terran medivac push would not destroy me is if I took some huge risk, or made DTs, or did some other sort of huge gamble, which is what would need to happen with my aforementioned hypothetical situation with the TvZ. Both transitions are extremely shaky because its hard to transition when you cut workers and tech for T1 units.
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
June 19 2012 10:19 GMT
#83
On June 19 2012 13:55 GleaM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 16 2012 22:38 TangSC wrote:
On June 16 2012 02:40 GleaM wrote:
If someone can post to me a pro game where the attack does no damage and the Z can still transition and win, without like a completely ridiculous blunder, I will change my opinion. As of now, however, there can be very little debate that this is all-in.

Building a nexus after 4gating PvZ or PvT doesn't mean that the 4gate isn't all-in. Building the nexus isn't a "transition"

Hmm I don't think the 4gate analogy is a good one for the roach/ling/baneling. Usually a 4-gate is around 19-22 workers with 1 base, this is 2 base with about 35-38 workers and 2 gas (easily enough income to take a 3rd and continue droning with upgrades). Generally speaking, the bust has to do some pretty significant damage but the sheer size of it is almost enough to guarantee you do at least equalizing damage. You're stating the worst case scenario (that the attack somehow does no damage) proves that the build is all-in, but the definition of an all-in is not "an attack that must do damage to stay even," since most attacks fall into this category.



Zerg operates differently from other races with this all-in for 2 reasons. One is that you're building units and not drones, which means that you are taking an active role in sacrificing economy for army. That is why early zerg attacks need to do damage, because you are cutting workers to execute the push. Also, you are using a unit that detonates when it attacks, so you need to follow that unit up with many many more units, which is costing more larvae, more gas, and cutting more workers.

Furthermore, you are staying on hatchery tech, which is completely stunting your upgrades and later game tech.

Let's paint a scenario here: Terran player on daybreak goes for standard 3 OC play into marine-tank. The high level player will, at 9 minutes, have 2 or 3 tanks in seige mode, at least one bunker, a partial or full supply depot wall, and many marines.This is with no scouting necessary. This is just the simple progression and idea behind the build. (One of the main builds at the moment, being used by the majority of the GSL/GSTL terrans, where they get a fast 3 OC, double ebay, tanks, then go into crazy marine/tank/medivac mode) All of that was without scouting. With proper scouting you could be facing more bunkers and a better defense. So a 3 OC terran can either choose to take a 3rd with a significant worker lead because they did not cut workers with their unit production, or they could keep their 3rd oc in their base and begin to push as the Z is putting up his 3rd on hatch tech, in which case the zerg is fighting marines and tanks and 2 medivacs by around 10 minutes with 1-1 and stim with speedlings, slow banelings, and roaches, with little to no creep spread (2 queens injecting and MAYBE a 3rd queen, only with Stephano's style)50 drones at the most (assuming the inject cycle after the tanks are scouted by the push) and 3 hatches (assuming the 3rd is finished) with 2 of them being injected (unless the 3rd queen in stephano's style leaves creep duty and ambles her way back there)

I don't see any way to win a game from this spot as zerg, unless the terran player completely messes something up horribly badly and loses an army for nothing or his mouse dies or something.

My point is this: Standard terran play, even with no scouting, can make this push do zero damage. And if the push doeszero damage, it is virtually impossible, for the explained reason, to transition OUT of the all-in.

I will say this again: Any thoughts on this situation? And does anyone have replays of this build doing little/no damage and still being able to transition into a stable midgame with no complete blunders by the terran player?

I don't think Terran can go gas-less FE into 3CC and still get 2-3 tanks with siege, a bunker, and a full supply depot wall before 9min. I've seen vioLet and Stephano do this build time and time again, and even if there's tanks they tend to do enough damage to transition and win. Most games I've seen haven't actually ended with this push - it's more of a stepping-stone into the mid game.

When you're executing the attack, you can actually drone up harder than you could if you were playing passive. Before you even start making roaches, you reach nearly full 2-base saturation with 2-3 gas. That means it only takes about 10 drones to fully saturate the gas and start 2 evo chambers. Often times, you can fully or partially saturate your third and begin a macro-hatch before you need to start making units. Naturally your tech is going to be a bit delayed (+1+1 and lair), but assuming you trade armies, take out a few depots/bunkers, and kill some SCVs, the delay in tech shouldn't hurt your mid-game.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
June 19 2012 10:22 GMT
#84
On June 19 2012 14:01 GleaM wrote:
And at the 4gate comment:

As a protoss, after the first warp-in of stalkers around 6 minutes, I can throw down a nexus and have around 60% chrono for probes, and have this at the 6 minute mark, which is pretty similar comparatively with the timings discussed with the roach/ling/baneling all-in. If I use the build, however, and the stalkers do no damage, the only way that a standard terran medivac push would not destroy me is if I took some huge risk, or made DTs, or did some other sort of huge gamble, which is what would need to happen with my aforementioned hypothetical situation with the TvZ. Both transitions are extremely shaky because its hard to transition when you cut workers and tech for T1 units.

A 6minute natural for protoss is pretty different than an 8:30 third for Zerg. Also, the saturation is completely different - 4gate is 1base saturation, roach/ling/bane is 2base saturation. The roach warren/bane nest may actually have use in the mid-game too (Roaches against mech, banelings against bio). You could always build the roaches/ling and not go for the bust, be completely safe to midgame pressure, and drone up your 3rd with upgrades and a lair.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
GleaM
Profile Joined June 2011
United States207 Posts
June 20 2012 02:08 GMT
#85
On June 19 2012 19:19 TangSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 19 2012 13:55 GleaM wrote:
On June 16 2012 22:38 TangSC wrote:
On June 16 2012 02:40 GleaM wrote:
If someone can post to me a pro game where the attack does no damage and the Z can still transition and win, without like a completely ridiculous blunder, I will change my opinion. As of now, however, there can be very little debate that this is all-in.

Building a nexus after 4gating PvZ or PvT doesn't mean that the 4gate isn't all-in. Building the nexus isn't a "transition"

Hmm I don't think the 4gate analogy is a good one for the roach/ling/baneling. Usually a 4-gate is around 19-22 workers with 1 base, this is 2 base with about 35-38 workers and 2 gas (easily enough income to take a 3rd and continue droning with upgrades). Generally speaking, the bust has to do some pretty significant damage but the sheer size of it is almost enough to guarantee you do at least equalizing damage. You're stating the worst case scenario (that the attack somehow does no damage) proves that the build is all-in, but the definition of an all-in is not "an attack that must do damage to stay even," since most attacks fall into this category.



Zerg operates differently from other races with this all-in for 2 reasons. One is that you're building units and not drones, which means that you are taking an active role in sacrificing economy for army. That is why early zerg attacks need to do damage, because you are cutting workers to execute the push. Also, you are using a unit that detonates when it attacks, so you need to follow that unit up with many many more units, which is costing more larvae, more gas, and cutting more workers.

Furthermore, you are staying on hatchery tech, which is completely stunting your upgrades and later game tech.

Let's paint a scenario here: Terran player on daybreak goes for standard 3 OC play into marine-tank. The high level player will, at 9 minutes, have 2 or 3 tanks in seige mode, at least one bunker, a partial or full supply depot wall, and many marines.This is with no scouting necessary. This is just the simple progression and idea behind the build. (One of the main builds at the moment, being used by the majority of the GSL/GSTL terrans, where they get a fast 3 OC, double ebay, tanks, then go into crazy marine/tank/medivac mode) All of that was without scouting. With proper scouting you could be facing more bunkers and a better defense. So a 3 OC terran can either choose to take a 3rd with a significant worker lead because they did not cut workers with their unit production, or they could keep their 3rd oc in their base and begin to push as the Z is putting up his 3rd on hatch tech, in which case the zerg is fighting marines and tanks and 2 medivacs by around 10 minutes with 1-1 and stim with speedlings, slow banelings, and roaches, with little to no creep spread (2 queens injecting and MAYBE a 3rd queen, only with Stephano's style)50 drones at the most (assuming the inject cycle after the tanks are scouted by the push) and 3 hatches (assuming the 3rd is finished) with 2 of them being injected (unless the 3rd queen in stephano's style leaves creep duty and ambles her way back there)

I don't see any way to win a game from this spot as zerg, unless the terran player completely messes something up horribly badly and loses an army for nothing or his mouse dies or something.

My point is this: Standard terran play, even with no scouting, can make this push do zero damage. And if the push doeszero damage, it is virtually impossible, for the explained reason, to transition OUT of the all-in.

I will say this again: Any thoughts on this situation? And does anyone have replays of this build doing little/no damage and still being able to transition into a stable midgame with no complete blunders by the terran player?

I don't think Terran can go gas-less FE into 3CC and still get 2-3 tanks with siege, a bunker, and a full supply depot wall before 9min. I've seen vioLet and Stephano do this build time and time again, and even if there's tanks they tend to do enough damage to transition and win. Most games I've seen haven't actually ended with this push - it's more of a stepping-stone into the mid game.

When you're executing the attack, you can actually drone up harder than you could if you were playing passive. Before you even start making roaches, you reach nearly full 2-base saturation with 2-3 gas. That means it only takes about 10 drones to fully saturate the gas and start 2 evo chambers. Often times, you can fully or partially saturate your third and begin a macro-hatch before you need to start making units. Naturally your tech is going to be a bit delayed (+1+1 and lair), but assuming you trade armies, take out a few depots/bunkers, and kill some SCVs, the delay in tech shouldn't hurt your mid-game.


You're completely ignoring what I am saying. You can never ever ever trade armies cost effectively with slow banelings, roaches, and un-upgraded speedlings vs marine tank medivac. I have other thoughts but I really can't go on until you address what I am saying.
GleaM
Profile Joined June 2011
United States207 Posts
June 20 2012 02:27 GMT
#86
On June 20 2012 11:08 GleaM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 19 2012 19:19 TangSC wrote:
On June 19 2012 13:55 GleaM wrote:
On June 16 2012 22:38 TangSC wrote:
On June 16 2012 02:40 GleaM wrote:
If someone can post to me a pro game where the attack does no damage and the Z can still transition and win, without like a completely ridiculous blunder, I will change my opinion. As of now, however, there can be very little debate that this is all-in.

Building a nexus after 4gating PvZ or PvT doesn't mean that the 4gate isn't all-in. Building the nexus isn't a "transition"

Hmm I don't think the 4gate analogy is a good one for the roach/ling/baneling. Usually a 4-gate is around 19-22 workers with 1 base, this is 2 base with about 35-38 workers and 2 gas (easily enough income to take a 3rd and continue droning with upgrades). Generally speaking, the bust has to do some pretty significant damage but the sheer size of it is almost enough to guarantee you do at least equalizing damage. You're stating the worst case scenario (that the attack somehow does no damage) proves that the build is all-in, but the definition of an all-in is not "an attack that must do damage to stay even," since most attacks fall into this category.



Zerg operates differently from other races with this all-in for 2 reasons. One is that you're building units and not drones, which means that you are taking an active role in sacrificing economy for army. That is why early zerg attacks need to do damage, because you are cutting workers to execute the push. Also, you are using a unit that detonates when it attacks, so you need to follow that unit up with many many more units, which is costing more larvae, more gas, and cutting more workers.

Furthermore, you are staying on hatchery tech, which is completely stunting your upgrades and later game tech.

Let's paint a scenario here: Terran player on daybreak goes for standard 3 OC play into marine-tank. The high level player will, at 9 minutes, have 2 or 3 tanks in seige mode, at least one bunker, a partial or full supply depot wall, and many marines.This is with no scouting necessary. This is just the simple progression and idea behind the build. (One of the main builds at the moment, being used by the majority of the GSL/GSTL terrans, where they get a fast 3 OC, double ebay, tanks, then go into crazy marine/tank/medivac mode) All of that was without scouting. With proper scouting you could be facing more bunkers and a better defense. So a 3 OC terran can either choose to take a 3rd with a significant worker lead because they did not cut workers with their unit production, or they could keep their 3rd oc in their base and begin to push as the Z is putting up his 3rd on hatch tech, in which case the zerg is fighting marines and tanks and 2 medivacs by around 10 minutes with 1-1 and stim with speedlings, slow banelings, and roaches, with little to no creep spread (2 queens injecting and MAYBE a 3rd queen, only with Stephano's style)50 drones at the most (assuming the inject cycle after the tanks are scouted by the push) and 3 hatches (assuming the 3rd is finished) with 2 of them being injected (unless the 3rd queen in stephano's style leaves creep duty and ambles her way back there)

I don't see any way to win a game from this spot as zerg, unless the terran player completely messes something up horribly badly and loses an army for nothing or his mouse dies or something.

My point is this: Standard terran play, even with no scouting, can make this push do zero damage. And if the push doeszero damage, it is virtually impossible, for the explained reason, to transition OUT of the all-in.

I will say this again: Any thoughts on this situation? And does anyone have replays of this build doing little/no damage and still being able to transition into a stable midgame with no complete blunders by the terran player?

I don't think Terran can go gas-less FE into 3CC and still get 2-3 tanks with siege, a bunker, and a full supply depot wall before 9min. I've seen vioLet and Stephano do this build time and time again, and even if there's tanks they tend to do enough damage to transition and win. Most games I've seen haven't actually ended with this push - it's more of a stepping-stone into the mid game.

When you're executing the attack, you can actually drone up harder than you could if you were playing passive. Before you even start making roaches, you reach nearly full 2-base saturation with 2-3 gas. That means it only takes about 10 drones to fully saturate the gas and start 2 evo chambers. Often times, you can fully or partially saturate your third and begin a macro-hatch before you need to start making units. Naturally your tech is going to be a bit delayed (+1+1 and lair), but assuming you trade armies, take out a few depots/bunkers, and kill some SCVs, the delay in tech shouldn't hurt your mid-game.


You're completely ignoring what I am saying. You can never ever ever trade armies cost effectively with slow banelings, roaches, and un-upgraded speedlings vs marine tank medivac. I have other thoughts but I really can't go on until you address what I am saying.


And for the sake of argument, so we don't have to squabble about 3 OC builds, let's say its a 3rax marine tank build off of a gasless FE with no 3rd OC
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-20 14:51:26
June 20 2012 14:43 GMT
#87
On June 20 2012 11:27 GleaM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 20 2012 11:08 GleaM wrote:
On June 19 2012 19:19 TangSC wrote:
On June 19 2012 13:55 GleaM wrote:
On June 16 2012 22:38 TangSC wrote:
On June 16 2012 02:40 GleaM wrote:
If someone can post to me a pro game where the attack does no damage and the Z can still transition and win, without like a completely ridiculous blunder, I will change my opinion. As of now, however, there can be very little debate that this is all-in.

Building a nexus after 4gating PvZ or PvT doesn't mean that the 4gate isn't all-in. Building the nexus isn't a "transition"

Hmm I don't think the 4gate analogy is a good one for the roach/ling/baneling. Usually a 4-gate is around 19-22 workers with 1 base, this is 2 base with about 35-38 workers and 2 gas (easily enough income to take a 3rd and continue droning with upgrades). Generally speaking, the bust has to do some pretty significant damage but the sheer size of it is almost enough to guarantee you do at least equalizing damage. You're stating the worst case scenario (that the attack somehow does no damage) proves that the build is all-in, but the definition of an all-in is not "an attack that must do damage to stay even," since most attacks fall into this category.



Zerg operates differently from other races with this all-in for 2 reasons. One is that you're building units and not drones, which means that you are taking an active role in sacrificing economy for army. That is why early zerg attacks need to do damage, because you are cutting workers to execute the push. Also, you are using a unit that detonates when it attacks, so you need to follow that unit up with many many more units, which is costing more larvae, more gas, and cutting more workers.

Furthermore, you are staying on hatchery tech, which is completely stunting your upgrades and later game tech.

Let's paint a scenario here: Terran player on daybreak goes for standard 3 OC play into marine-tank. The high level player will, at 9 minutes, have 2 or 3 tanks in seige mode, at least one bunker, a partial or full supply depot wall, and many marines.This is with no scouting necessary. This is just the simple progression and idea behind the build. (One of the main builds at the moment, being used by the majority of the GSL/GSTL terrans, where they get a fast 3 OC, double ebay, tanks, then go into crazy marine/tank/medivac mode) All of that was without scouting. With proper scouting you could be facing more bunkers and a better defense. So a 3 OC terran can either choose to take a 3rd with a significant worker lead because they did not cut workers with their unit production, or they could keep their 3rd oc in their base and begin to push as the Z is putting up his 3rd on hatch tech, in which case the zerg is fighting marines and tanks and 2 medivacs by around 10 minutes with 1-1 and stim with speedlings, slow banelings, and roaches, with little to no creep spread (2 queens injecting and MAYBE a 3rd queen, only with Stephano's style)50 drones at the most (assuming the inject cycle after the tanks are scouted by the push) and 3 hatches (assuming the 3rd is finished) with 2 of them being injected (unless the 3rd queen in stephano's style leaves creep duty and ambles her way back there)

I don't see any way to win a game from this spot as zerg, unless the terran player completely messes something up horribly badly and loses an army for nothing or his mouse dies or something.

My point is this: Standard terran play, even with no scouting, can make this push do zero damage. And if the push doeszero damage, it is virtually impossible, for the explained reason, to transition OUT of the all-in.

I will say this again: Any thoughts on this situation? And does anyone have replays of this build doing little/no damage and still being able to transition into a stable midgame with no complete blunders by the terran player?

I don't think Terran can go gas-less FE into 3CC and still get 2-3 tanks with siege, a bunker, and a full supply depot wall before 9min. I've seen vioLet and Stephano do this build time and time again, and even if there's tanks they tend to do enough damage to transition and win. Most games I've seen haven't actually ended with this push - it's more of a stepping-stone into the mid game.

When you're executing the attack, you can actually drone up harder than you could if you were playing passive. Before you even start making roaches, you reach nearly full 2-base saturation with 2-3 gas. That means it only takes about 10 drones to fully saturate the gas and start 2 evo chambers. Often times, you can fully or partially saturate your third and begin a macro-hatch before you need to start making units. Naturally your tech is going to be a bit delayed (+1+1 and lair), but assuming you trade armies, take out a few depots/bunkers, and kill some SCVs, the delay in tech shouldn't hurt your mid-game.


You're completely ignoring what I am saying. You can never ever ever trade armies cost effectively with slow banelings, roaches, and un-upgraded speedlings vs marine tank medivac. I have other thoughts but I really can't go on until you address what I am saying.


And for the sake of argument, so we don't have to squabble about 3 OC builds, let's say its a 3rax marine tank build off of a gasless FE with no 3rd OC

You actually could trade pretty well against a gasless FE into 3rax marine/tank (at least kill bunker/depots/scvs/1-2 tanks/lots of marines). You're overestimating the power of tanks in TvZ, I've seen vioLet and Stephano games where opponents open tanks and they engage at the natural and the game is equalized.

You also have the option to run a ling up the ramp, get shelled by a siege tank, and simply pull back before morphing banelings and be in a comparable economic position with a third base already started. If you morphed the banes, you might be a bit behind but it's certainly not over just because you opened with these units. I actually think if most players opened roach/ling/baneling like this defensively, they can move into 3-4 base play pretty easily/safely.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
Vanadiel
Profile Joined April 2012
France961 Posts
June 20 2012 15:46 GMT
#88
For example, Stephano against MKP at recent mlg did win the game on entombed valley when he went for this strat and did 0 dammage.
Chronos.
Profile Joined February 2012
United States805 Posts
June 20 2012 18:14 GMT
#89
Fantastic guide, I like how you put the different pro's variations of it.

I'm gonna start trying this right away, I'm sick of Terran's going super greedy into super aggresive lately, it'll be nice to bring the aggression back to them >=D
Mahtasooma
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany475 Posts
June 20 2012 22:45 GMT
#90
I'm still having trouble hiding this... because roaches (and lings) are slow basically, and if you head across the map with 9 roaches at that timing... it's pretty obvious.
also I find it rather vulnerable to hellion runbys... you really have to look out for that..
http://twitch.tv/mahtasooma
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1338 Posts
June 20 2012 22:49 GMT
#91
On June 21 2012 00:46 Vanadiel wrote:
For example, Stephano against MKP at recent mlg did win the game on entombed valley when he went for this strat and did 0 dammage.


yep, basically MKP counters the build by walling off with rax only at the front so zerg has to retreat. that might probably be the easiest counter from the T side.

but since pretty much no T does that, this (semi) all in is super strong vs 1 rax FE. ^^
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
June 22 2012 15:16 GMT
#92
On June 21 2012 07:45 Mahtasooma wrote:
I'm still having trouble hiding this... because roaches (and lings) are slow basically, and if you head across the map with 9 roaches at that timing... it's pretty obvious.
also I find it rather vulnerable to hellion runbys... you really have to look out for that..

You want to have your lings hidden on the other side of the map, ideally you can morph into banelings as soon as the roaches arrive. Hellion runbys shouldn't be too common, and if they are, reset your ling reinforcements and you should clean it up with queen/ling.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
frezMki
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany62 Posts
June 25 2012 02:26 GMT
#93
This Build is an instant-win against Mech-Play since there is barely anything out to stop you

User was temp banned for this post.

User was temporarily forum banned for this post.
They say if it's not broken don't fix it - Well, if it could be better it is as good as broken
mYiKane
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Canada1772 Posts
June 25 2012 03:13 GMT
#94
On June 25 2012 11:26 frezMki wrote:
This Build is an instant-win against Mech-Play since there is barely anything out to stop you


no it's not.
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
June 25 2012 15:55 GMT
#95
On June 25 2012 12:13 LgNKane wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2012 11:26 frezMki wrote:
This Build is an instant-win against Mech-Play since there is barely anything out to stop you


no it's not.

I see what he's saying, usually FE --> Hellion play is a bit more vulnerable to roach/ling and roach/ling/baneling builds. I don't think it's an instant win though.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
josephmcjoe
Profile Joined October 2009
United States57 Posts
June 25 2012 16:20 GMT
#96
On June 12 2012 19:50 HaXXspetten wrote:
Show nested quote +
DRG's recent victory over Alecia (Protoss) in the MLG Spring Championship

Stopped reading right there.


Ah, spelling snobs.
"This guy is the Bob Ross of adept shading: a little shade here, a little shade there." -Lambo
houffy
Profile Joined February 2012
United States12 Posts
June 25 2012 21:34 GMT
#97
nice guide, thanks tang. i'll definitely be giving this a try.
www.twitch.tv/houffy / www.youtube.com/houffy7
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
June 28 2012 00:01 GMT
#98
On June 26 2012 06:34 houffy wrote:
nice guide, thanks tang. i'll definitely be giving this a try.

I recommend mixing the vioLet and Stephano variations and also mixing between executing it as an all-in, and as a stepping stone into your choice of macro.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
chaosftw
Profile Joined June 2012
24 Posts
June 28 2012 01:40 GMT
#99
DRG FTW!
AndySCWilson
Profile Joined September 2010
43 Posts
July 12 2012 03:17 GMT
#100
Now I'm pretty inexperienced, and don't have much of a clue when it comes to thinking about this game - so I'm posting here for you guys to show me why my thinking is wrong.

Is it reasonable (or even possible) to mix-and-match openings and transitions? I really how Stephano's build transitions, but I really hate grabbing gas so early (easy to scout, makes attacking them awkward when they have that much of a heads-up). So I'm tempted to adapt DRG's version of the opening, because it gas after lings. But I really love getting that third behind the push - is it reasonable to use a DRG opening, but still get that early third, instead of the macro hatch?

Furthermore can I not go muta but continue into infester/ling/bling/ultra, quick hive - like stephanos? Do you need to go muta to deny drops if you open with DRG's but not Stephanos? Does DRG builds put the Terran in a position where they basically have to go for drop play, thus putting me in a position where I need mutas to deny?

Is the answer it to take a later gas with the stephano (perhaps at 23) opening and just keep the drones mining gas?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
GSL Code S
09:30
Ro8 - Group A
Solar vs GuMihoLIVE!
Crank 307
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 243
ProTech76
EnDerr 60
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 18035
Rain 5124
Calm 4884
Bisu 2053
Horang2 1679
Jaedong 978
Pusan 388
BeSt 369
Last 286
Mini 200
[ Show more ]
ZerO 175
TY 150
Snow 146
Soulkey 141
EffOrt 134
Light 117
Shuttle 85
ggaemo 84
Dewaltoss 83
Hyun 70
ToSsGirL 57
Shine 53
[sc1f]eonzerg 50
hero 45
PianO 38
Aegong 35
Killer 33
Mong 26
Sacsri 24
Icarus 23
sSak 22
JYJ22
Barracks 20
Sharp 20
Movie 18
sorry 17
zelot 6
HiyA 5
Dota 2
qojqva1211
420jenkins504
XcaliburYe457
Fuzer 227
Counter-Strike
x6flipin695
markeloff82
edward11
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor148
Other Games
singsing2720
B2W.Neo1280
DeMusliM496
Crank 354
XBOCT266
crisheroes201
XaKoH 139
Lowko78
ZerO(Twitch)25
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream9179
Other Games
gamesdonequick431
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV141
Upcoming Events
Online Event
11h 30m
Replay Cast
13h 30m
GSL Code S
21h
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
21h 30m
Replay Cast
1d 11h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 22h
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.