• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:18
CEST 06:18
KST 13:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon54Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?160Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism
Tourneys
RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 KSL Week #92 IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly 2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Broodwar Prediction Market Practice Partners (Official) [D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group A [ASL22] Ro16 Group B Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
EVE Corporation Diablo IV Nintendo Switch Thread [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Diablo Animated Series on Netflix Movie Discussion!
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6545 users

Work In Progress Melee Maps - Page 88

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 86 87 88 89 90 217 Next
Keep our forum clean! PLEASE post your WIP melee maps in this thread for initial feedback. -Barrin
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
November 29 2013 19:07 GMT
#1741
For the record, Alterzim is a terrible map. The worst kind of gimmick map. I do think FRB would make it play substantially better, straight up, yes. But I agree it wouldn't "fix" it.

@neobowman: FRB was a cool experiment, but it ended up not really achieving the goal. But I think we learned some things in the process. Such as, terran imba. (mules on 6m bases is stooooopid)

@lez: I like unconventional main base layouts like that, but it definitely shifts the game into a different territory where players can just die in certain situations where they miss a proxy or otherwise don't get a good scout. I would make sure the center of your map has watchtowers to allow spotting of early moveouts so that it's not too easy to 1base.

@infcereal: not a bad concept, but you really need to work on your proportions. For example the main base is ridiculous small, and you need a diagonal ramp there. The natural is also cramped. The middle is kind of chokey for the only spot to move through without breaking rocks. The open areas in front of the 3rd base are very large, maybe there can be something there. It seems like this map should be at least 10-20% bigger just so there is room for the mains in the corners.

@namrufus: First thing, I would remove the ramps that connect the 4m1g 3rd bases. I think it only detracts from the map and will result in 1dimensional pushes into those areas. I would also make the map a little wider, the rush distance seems a bit short. For example, the large open area in front of the rocktower at the real 3rd, the distance between those areas is quite short, and that is where armies will usually stand in a more passive game. I think you should put a tower in the open lowground to provide players a reason to go down there. So it watches the level 1 narrow path but none of the level 2 route. I don't think the natural should be 6m1hyg, I don't think this operates the way you want it to here. If anything you could have distance mining patches or something. Have you thought about 4hym1hyg bases instead of 4m1g? I think these would be more interesting because they really punish sticking to only 2 bases but they don't let you sit around on "3 bases". Is it a conscious choice to have the walloff spot so far from the natural nexus? (Out of range of photon overcharge?) I feel like the ramp should be in a more normal (less forward) spot. The 12 oclock gas only is kind of weird. I think there should be minerals there too so it can be a real income source in a mined out game, not a "win more" gas boost.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
November 30 2013 08:20 GMT
#1742
On November 30 2013 04:07 EatThePath wrote:
@neobowman: FRB was a cool experiment, but it ended up not really achieving the goal. But I think we learned some things in the process. Such as, terran imba. (mules on 6m bases is stooooopid)

That's an interesting point you bring up. Considering that Terrans have an advantage with fewer resource bases, wouldn't the inverse be true as well? I imagine that at a certain point, having more minerals would be detrimental to Zerg who tend to have lots of bases but not enough drones to saturate the minerals. It could be interesting to play around with it for balance considerations.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-02 05:41:33
November 30 2013 11:34 GMT
#1743
Experimenting more with far 3rds and narrow chokes vs open spaces on an otherwise standard (though relatively small at 148x148) 4p layout. Basically as Z you'll want to defend in one of the open areas either in front of your nat or 3rd, as P/T you can use one of the chokes.

Not sure yet what to do with the center, probably just a few obstacles to reduce the openness - maybe a center gold base for the lulz?

[image loading]
vibeo gane,
Meavis
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Netherlands1300 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-30 12:45:28
November 30 2013 12:44 GMT
#1744
made something very similair to that, made it very hard for zerg to take a 3rd, if not other races later, but if thats what you want to achieve I don't see the problem.
"Not you."
meatpudding
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia520 Posts
November 30 2013 12:54 GMT
#1745
something has always irked me about 3rds with one entrance. I guess derelict watcher has shown that it's not imba, but it seems uninteresting. I kind of like the antiga shipyard approach. for the attacker by ground it's predictable that they can only use one path, and for the defender it can be annoying to navigate against air harrassment. just imo but I would hate to play a PvZ like that.
Be excellent to each other.
moskonia
Profile Joined January 2011
Israel1448 Posts
November 30 2013 14:57 GMT
#1746
-NegativeZero- , the chokes seem too tight, maybe make some ramps 3 width and rocks in some of the heavy chokes. I really love the 1 width ramp 3rd's, really want to see a map with this feature get played on a major tournament or on the ladder.
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
November 30 2013 15:16 GMT
#1747
Stairway to Oblivion


[image loading]

144^2
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
Meavis
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Netherlands1300 Posts
November 30 2013 15:29 GMT
#1748
natural and both thirds look over vurnable to cannon rush
"Not you."
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-30 15:48:24
November 30 2013 15:48 GMT
#1749
On December 01 2013 00:29 19Meavis93 wrote:
natural and both thirds look over vurnable to cannon rush

you could just take the other third against a cannon rush
anyway no zerg in their right mind is going to take the forward third
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
Meavis
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Netherlands1300 Posts
November 30 2013 16:04 GMT
#1750
not only the cliffs, but also the minerals, theres plenty of opportunity for 2pylon blocks from what I can see
"Not you."
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
November 30 2013 23:03 GMT
#1751
I think the corner bases are a little too close, try spacing them out more evenly with the other bases.
vibeo gane,
Qwyn
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2781 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-01 00:05:01
December 01 2013 00:04 GMT
#1752
NegativeZero with the current TvZ meta it looks far too difficult for Zerg to take a third and hold it while Terran once a walloff is up and defensive mines placed should have a much easier time holding a third - and the momentum shifts which occur when expansions power up are so critical...It would be cool if we saw a fallback to an older meta of macro hatch before third but I don't think that's very likely since Terrans are so adept at holding expansions now.

To all mapmakers - what do you think about pressing mineral lines closer to the edge of cliffs so that retarded cannon rushes are no longer possible? I think it would be very good for ZvP.

Negative if you just moved the third a bit closer then I think the map would be awesome.
"Think of the hysteria following the realization that they consciously consume babies and raise the dead people from their graves" - N0
algue
Profile Joined July 2011
France1436 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-01 18:39:10
December 01 2013 16:42 GMT
#1753
bloodstained ground

The map is kinda small (147*140).
7 bases
Open 2nd base
2 choices for your 3rd base : one of them has only one gaz (high yield vespene gaz)
Short rush distance
You can't touch the nexus/hatch/CC by sieging a tank behind the 3rd base minerals
Many path ways and sneaky stuff

[image loading]
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Tell me what you think
I'll publish it soon, I still need to fix/finish many things
rly ?
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
December 02 2013 05:59 GMT
#1754
[image loading]

Changes made:
-Increased width of 4 ramps from 2 to 3
-Added a little more space to the open areas in front of nats and 3rds
-Added 2 burrowed ultralisks to each 3rd ramp to prevent both defensive and offensive FFs until they are killed
-Added central obstacles and watchtower

To clarify the original intent/reply to people's comments/explain some stuff:
The thirds are indeed supposed to be hard to take. (In fact, every expansion should be a little more difficult to take - the nat chokes are also 2 squares wider than normal.) However, theoretically I think defending the 3rd as Z shouldn't be any harder than as P/T. On 3 bases, Z will want to use the 2 open areas in front of the nat and 3rd to defend, intercepting the enemy army before it actually reaches the 3rd entrance - these 2 areas are significantly closer than the actual nat-3rd distance and have more than enough room for the zerg army to get a good surround.

I know people have been avoiding using watchtowers recently and for good reason, but with the bases on this map so much more spread out than normal, I think this one might be interesting and effective in keeping track of army movements, idk. Thoughts?

Also I remember someone using the burrowed ultralisk FF preventing thing a long time ago, but I forget what map it was and I can't find it...
vibeo gane,
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
December 02 2013 19:48 GMT
#1755
On December 01 2013 00:16 The_Templar wrote:
Stairway to Oblivion


+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

144^2

Small update, fixed most of the mineral lines. Still trying to move one of the corner bases without destroying the layout.
[image loading]
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
Rasias
Profile Joined November 2013
Germany51 Posts
December 03 2013 10:14 GMT
#1756
Hey there.. so.. this is my first map.. ever.
Please tell me what i've done completly wrong :D
The idea was, to create a map, that has initialy a long rush distance but get's much shorter as the game progresses (by destroying the rocks between the bases)
Of course it is still WIP and the bounds of the long highway-thingy aren't there yet.
Thanks in advance.

[image loading]
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 05 2013 01:30 GMT
#1757
On December 02 2013 14:59 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Also I remember someone using the burrowed ultralisk FF preventing thing a long time ago, but I forget what map it was and I can't find it...

I want to say that was monitor or maybe semmo, I could be wrong though. The map was dirt/sand coloured, that's all I can remember. XD

I have also played around with making duplicate colossus units with alternate textures so they look like statues. That way the players know they are there but can still move through them while they block FF. idk, maybe something like this is worth it.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
skdeimos
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada155 Posts
December 05 2013 01:48 GMT
#1758
On December 02 2013 14:59 -NegativeZero- wrote:
[image loading]

Changes made:
-Increased width of 4 ramps from 2 to 3
-Added a little more space to the open areas in front of nats and 3rds
-Added 2 burrowed ultralisks to each 3rd ramp to prevent both defensive and offensive FFs until they are killed
-Added central obstacles and watchtower

To clarify the original intent/reply to people's comments/explain some stuff:
The thirds are indeed supposed to be hard to take. (In fact, every expansion should be a little more difficult to take - the nat chokes are also 2 squares wider than normal.) However, theoretically I think defending the 3rd as Z shouldn't be any harder than as P/T. On 3 bases, Z will want to use the 2 open areas in front of the nat and 3rd to defend, intercepting the enemy army before it actually reaches the 3rd entrance - these 2 areas are significantly closer than the actual nat-3rd distance and have more than enough room for the zerg army to get a good surround.

I know people have been avoiding using watchtowers recently and for good reason, but with the bases on this map so much more spread out than normal, I think this one might be interesting and effective in keeping track of army movements, idk. Thoughts?

Also I remember someone using the burrowed ultralisk FF preventing thing a long time ago, but I forget what map it was and I can't find it...


Wow, this is really cool. I might try something along these lines after finals since I'll have time.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
December 05 2013 06:13 GMT
#1759
On December 05 2013 10:30 EatThePath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2013 14:59 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Also I remember someone using the burrowed ultralisk FF preventing thing a long time ago, but I forget what map it was and I can't find it...

I want to say that was monitor or maybe semmo, I could be wrong though. The map was dirt/sand coloured, that's all I can remember. XD

I have also played around with making duplicate colossus units with alternate textures so they look like statues. That way the players know they are there but can still move through them while they block FF. idk, maybe something like this is worth it.

Are the colossi indestructible or raised HP something? I think the advantage of using burrowed ultras is that they are burrowed and therefore harder to remove, at least in the early game where something like an FF blocking the ramp is more likely to be a game-changing event.
vibeo gane,
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 05 2013 07:27 GMT
#1760
On December 05 2013 15:13 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2013 10:30 EatThePath wrote:
On December 02 2013 14:59 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Also I remember someone using the burrowed ultralisk FF preventing thing a long time ago, but I forget what map it was and I can't find it...

I want to say that was monitor or maybe semmo, I could be wrong though. The map was dirt/sand coloured, that's all I can remember. XD

I have also played around with making duplicate colossus units with alternate textures so they look like statues. That way the players know they are there but can still move through them while they block FF. idk, maybe something like this is worth it.

Are the colossi indestructible or raised HP something? I think the advantage of using burrowed ultras is that they are burrowed and therefore harder to remove, at least in the early game where something like an FF blocking the ramp is more likely to be a game-changing event.

I actually first did them as untargetable / unkillable because I wanted a permanent FF blocker that was also a built-in visual cue. Without knowing the ultras are there you just see a forcefield fail to appear, so it could be confusing. You could make it however though, like same HP/armor as rocks, with or without shields that recharge quickly, etc.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Prev 1 86 87 88 89 90 217 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
20:30
Masters Cup #151
davetesta50
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Aegong 56
yabsab 14
Icarus 8
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm186
LuMiX1
Other Games
summit1g11151
JimRising 573
PiGStarcraft309
ViBE152
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV216
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22154
League of Legends
• Lourlo1077
• Stunt240
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5h 42m
WardiTV Invitational
6h 42m
ByuN vs Percival
Cure vs Classic
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
10h 42m
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
11h 42m
Serral vs Rogue
BlizzCon
14h 12m
IdrA vs MC
Replay Cast
19h 42m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 5h
Light vs JyJ
Soulkey vs hero
WardiTV Weekly
1d 6h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 11h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Shinee
Shine vs EffOrt
[ Show More ]
GSL
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - TRS
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.