• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:19
CEST 04:19
KST 11:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy8uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event14Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) ByuN vs TaeJa Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion New season has just come in ladder StarCraft player reflex TE scores BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The year 2050
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Biochemical Cost of Gami…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 662 users

[A] Starbow - Page 313

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 311 312 313 314 315 537 Next
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9390 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-30 15:52:33
June 30 2013 15:33 GMT
#6241
On June 30 2013 23:12 SolidSMD wrote:
I agree a tad too strong, a baneling dies in 4 ticks if i'm not mistaken, and 4 ticks pass quickly, so losing a whole chunk of your ling/bane can happen in seconds.


Yeh I think just massing marine/medi/SV's is just way easier vs zerg. Mixing in reapers seems like a completely unnecessary compliciation.

Anyway, I feel that Starbow is getting closer to feeling right. We still need to figure out roles for the reaper, ghost, sentinel and I guess the scout could be more fun to use as well. Right now it has a boring attack and a secondary ability.

Regarding the ghost I am thinking of whether it wouldn't just be easier to get rid of it. I think the matrix tanks dynamic vs reavers is quite interesting and it would be more fun work on getting that right rather than keeping the ghost in the game.
SolidSMD
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium408 Posts
June 30 2013 15:55 GMT
#6242
oh, i should make some scouts in pvt, always forget them
Working on Starbow!
Ritos753
Profile Joined May 2011
United States26 Posts
June 30 2013 16:25 GMT
#6243
I feel like bio needs to be more viable tvp. I feel like chargelots are simply overpowering tanks but reavers and storm kills bio so efficiently its not even an option to deal with zlots.
SolidSMD
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium408 Posts
June 30 2013 16:28 GMT
#6244
you move out with too few tanks
Working on Starbow!
Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
June 30 2013 16:50 GMT
#6245
Updated zerg photos on the wiki. They used to be red units on red background, but now they are on green background to make them more visible. Also, added new units like Vipers, Creepers and Defilers.

Is mech still viable in PvT? I think we need to figure this out first since there has been recent changes in toss. Bio is probably not too viable atm, and I don't think that is our main concern either.
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
GamanNo
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden63 Posts
June 30 2013 17:03 GMT
#6246
On July 01 2013 01:50 Xiphias wrote:
Updated zerg photos on the wiki.

Nice! These ones looks much better.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9390 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-30 18:45:31
June 30 2013 18:26 GMT
#6247
Is mech still viable in PvT? I think we need to figure this out first since there has been recent changes in toss.


No. The 3 second reduction in stalker build time absolutely killed mech in that matchup. ^^

Anyway, I feel that something has to be done about SV's. Espeically in tvz they are incredibly strong, and bio + sv's makes mutas an unviable unit in that matchup. I don't think a devourer counter to sv's is enough, because bio + sv's can hit earlier. I will suggest to reduce its DPS somewhat.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
June 30 2013 20:33 GMT
#6248
On July 01 2013 03:26 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
Is mech still viable in PvT? I think we need to figure this out first since there has been recent changes in toss.


No. The 3 second reduction in stalker build time absolutely killed mech in that matchup. ^^

Anyway, I feel that something has to be done about SV's. Espeically in tvz they are incredibly strong, and bio + sv's makes mutas an unviable unit in that matchup. I don't think a devourer counter to sv's is enough, because bio + sv's can hit earlier. I will suggest to reduce its DPS somewhat.


I think Plague and Scourge are the way to go against vessels. Maybe abduct, though anytime you abduct a vessel you should lose the viper as well to an irradiate if the Terran pays attention.
But I generally agree, SVs are incredible catch all units against zerg. The only reason not to irradiate a zerg unit upon sight is that there may even be a better target. (or if it is an overlord or a stray zergling, to end the exaggeration)

btw, what are irradiate's stats at the moment. The wiki says:

Irradiate

Energy: 75
Range:
Duration: 35 s

Irradiates a single target for 35 seconds, causing X damage every second to that target and to all nearby targets. Irradiate does not damage mechanical untis, but nearby biological units will take damage from an Irradiated mechanical unit


So range and the damage/second are missing.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9390 Posts
June 30 2013 20:43 GMT
#6249
On July 01 2013 05:33 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2013 03:26 Hider wrote:
Is mech still viable in PvT? I think we need to figure this out first since there has been recent changes in toss.


No. The 3 second reduction in stalker build time absolutely killed mech in that matchup. ^^

Anyway, I feel that something has to be done about SV's. Espeically in tvz they are incredibly strong, and bio + sv's makes mutas an unviable unit in that matchup. I don't think a devourer counter to sv's is enough, because bio + sv's can hit earlier. I will suggest to reduce its DPS somewhat.


I think Plague and Scourge are the way to go against vessels. Maybe abduct, though anytime you abduct a vessel you should lose the viper as well to an irradiate if the Terran pays attention.
But I generally agree, SVs are incredible catch all units against zerg. The only reason not to irradiate a zerg unit upon sight is that there may even be a better target. (or if it is an overlord or a stray zergling, to end the exaggeration)

btw, what are irradiate's stats at the moment. The wiki says:

Show nested quote +
Irradiate

Energy: 75
Range:
Duration: 35 s

Irradiates a single target for 35 seconds, causing X damage every second to that target and to all nearby targets. Irradiate does not damage mechanical untis, but nearby biological units will take damage from an Irradiated mechanical unit


So range and the damage/second are missing.


I really don't think you can afford anything tech heavy in the midgame vs SV/bio in the midgame. It is such a ridicilous cost efficient composition. If you go vipers for abduxt, then you also need hydras and lurkers and you can't really afford that, cus then your main army will be absolutely shit.

I think just going bling --> hive or lurker/ling --> hive is probably the best choices. Then you'll mix in scourges once you get on 4-5 bases.
GamanNo
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden63 Posts
June 30 2013 21:05 GMT
#6250
On July 01 2013 05:33 Big J wrote:

btw, what are irradiate's stats at the moment. The wiki says:


From reading the stats in the map editor my guess would be that it does 7 damage per second. But I'm really not sure if I'm reading it right, so I left it empty.

Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
June 30 2013 21:14 GMT
#6251
I read the same and changed it to 7 right now, but it's 35 sec so that adds up to a total of 245 dmg which might be wrong. If it's true, it's too much. I don't think one irr should kill one lurker, but leave it almost dead like in BW.
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9390 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-30 22:20:31
June 30 2013 21:33 GMT
#6252
On July 01 2013 06:14 Xiphias wrote:
I read the same and changed it to 7 right now, but it's 35 sec so that adds up to a total of 245 dmg which might be wrong. If it's true, it's too much. I don't think one irr should kill one lurker, but leave it almost dead like in BW.


Wait it didn't kill lurkers in bw?
Then why did we have all these discussions about why irradiate was OP in starbow and not in bw? Just nerf it ASAP. Due to smartcast it definitely shouldn't be better than in bw.

Regarding blink: I think it breakes tvp at the moment. 2/3 base blink stalkers makes it absolutely impossible for the terran to move out regardless of whether he plays bio or mech. It may be possible for him to defend if he plays perfectly, but the dynamic it creates isn't good for the game as it means that you never wanna do anything else vs terran than going blink.

I think adding a templar tech requirement for blink research would be the most effective change as it would result in given the terran bio player at least a period where he could do some damage to the opponent. Also, since reaver openings in general seems stronger than templar openings, this would protoss's slighly more incentivied to get templars over reavers in the midgame.
SolidSMD
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium408 Posts
June 30 2013 22:29 GMT
#6253
On July 01 2013 06:33 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2013 06:14 Xiphias wrote:
I read the same and changed it to 7 right now, but it's 35 sec so that adds up to a total of 245 dmg which might be wrong. If it's true, it's too much. I don't think one irr should kill one lurker, but leave it almost dead like in BW.


Wait it didn't kill lurkers in bw?
Then why did we have all these discussions about why irradiate was OP in starbow and not in bw? Just nerf it ASAP. Due to smartcast it definitely shouldn't be better than in bw.

Regarding blink: I think it breakes tvp at the moment. 2/3 base blink stalkers makes it absolutely impossible for the terran to move out regardless of whether he plays bio or mech. It may be possible for him to defend if he plays perfectly, but the dynamic it creates isn't good for the game as it means that you never wanna do anything else vs terran than going blink.

I think adding a templar tech requirement for blink research would be the most effective change as it would result in given the terran bio player at least a period where he could do some damage to the opponent. Also, since reaver openings in general seems stronger than templar openings, this would protoss's slighly more incentivied to get templars over reavers in the midgame.


give it a night's rest and try again tomorrow, wont be as bad as it looks now.
Working on Starbow!
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9390 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-30 22:38:44
June 30 2013 22:36 GMT
#6254
On July 01 2013 07:29 SolidSMD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2013 06:33 Hider wrote:
On July 01 2013 06:14 Xiphias wrote:
I read the same and changed it to 7 right now, but it's 35 sec so that adds up to a total of 245 dmg which might be wrong. If it's true, it's too much. I don't think one irr should kill one lurker, but leave it almost dead like in BW.


Wait it didn't kill lurkers in bw?
Then why did we have all these discussions about why irradiate was OP in starbow and not in bw? Just nerf it ASAP. Due to smartcast it definitely shouldn't be better than in bw.

Regarding blink: I think it breakes tvp at the moment. 2/3 base blink stalkers makes it absolutely impossible for the terran to move out regardless of whether he plays bio or mech. It may be possible for him to defend if he plays perfectly, but the dynamic it creates isn't good for the game as it means that you never wanna do anything else vs terran than going blink.

I think adding a templar tech requirement for blink research would be the most effective change as it would result in given the terran bio player at least a period where he could do some damage to the opponent. Also, since reaver openings in general seems stronger than templar openings, this would protoss's slighly more incentivied to get templars over reavers in the midgame.


give it a night's rest and try again tomorrow, wont be as bad as it looks now.


The protoss can still force the terran to defend for such a long period regardless of whether he goes bio or tank, Meanwhile the protoss can expand like a zerg player, which gives him an advantage going into lategame. Thus teching quickly to blink stalkers will always be optimal for the protoss player. Later blink tech will add much more variation into the game and actually give the terran bio player a chance to put pressure on the opponent in the early midgame.

Right now there doesn't seem to be any downside to get early blink and mass stalkers.
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-01 09:40:53
June 30 2013 23:43 GMT
#6255
The topic that ruins my sleep

Sumadin, you haunt me. In every game you say "Bio without Marauders will never ever work in TvP or TvT."
I say: "Pffftt... nonsens."
You continue.
I continue.
Convinced that I am right in this matter.
But I have been wrong so many times before.
So I have decided to give your constant echo a chance.
I sat down with pen and paper and pondered over some solutions.

Lets play with the thought:
What would happen with the game if the Marauder, after all, was added to the game in some modified version?

Problems I see right away:
- A-move into Lurker lines would be too good.
- Would still not make bio work in TvT since Spider mines + Tanks are so brutal
- Bio would still be hard countered by Reavers
- Would force Force Field back into the game. Otherwise Stalkers would not stand a chance
- Big blobs of Marauders just stimming and killing everything...

Must it be like this?
Is it possible to adjust the Marauder so it fits into the game and actually adds something good to the gameplay?

A potential solution:

Marauder
Cost 75/25 <--- (Cheaper than in SC2!)
Build time 30-35 seconds
HP 80 <--- (125 in SC2)
Armored
Armor 1
Damage 8 vs all, ca 12-14 vs armored (Compare to SC2 where they deal 10 vs all, 20 vs armored!)
Attack cooldown 1.5 seconds
Speed 2.25
Range 4 or 5.
Require tech lab?

Ok, what would these stats do?
- Lurkers 4 shot them, so A-move into them would still be hard. (As it should be!)
- They are cost efficent vs Stalkers, and can actually apply pressure vs P early, but they are NOT insanely strong!
- They would help Terran early Bio stronger in TvT, since Marauders would be able to fight vs the early Vultures/Tanks.
(It would be harder once Terran reaches a high enough number of Siege tanks.)

What units would Marauders do extra damage versus?
- Tanks, Goliaths, Marauders, Stalkers, Archons, Reaver, Queen, Lurker, Ultralisk, Structures (including Static defence...)
The extra toughness from the Marauders would help Terran bio to apply pressure vs all races.

What countes the Marauder?
- Tanks, Spider mines, Marines, Zealots, Storm, Reaver, Lurker, Hydra, Zergling, Flying units.

But what about TvT? Marauders will die just like Marines when they attack into Siege tanks...

- Well, sieged Siege tanks, Spider mines and Lurkers are supposed to be strong at that area.
But if we want Marauders to NOT be completely worthless, maybe some kind of upgrade can be added that reduces splash damage by a value. This would make them able to survive 2-shots from a Reaver, 3-shots from a tank, 2 spider mines etc. Still not super strong in a straight up fight, but not ridiculously fragile like Marines...

What would the total picture of Bio be?
- Marines are low HP, high DPS.
- Reaper are fast, fragile, strong vs light units. (Especially with splash upgrade.)
- Marauders are high HP, decent DPS vs armored. (Best bio alternative vs armored units.)
- Medics are supporter. Heal and can use Matrix on any unit.
- Ghosts are disable/harassment.

Maybe stats must be modified a little bit so we reach this scenario:
- Marauders have best DPS vs armored.
- Reapers have best DPS vs light.
- Marines have best DPS vs "medium" units. (For example lower their damage vs all from 6 to 5.)

The optimal scenario would be if each bio unit was truly useful for different purposes.
Otherwise Marines might still be the strongest bio counter versus every unit since they have superior DPS vs everything!

But what about the larger gameplay picture? Would this not break everything?


Are blobs of Marines unstoppable? I would say no.
If we keep the Marauder at decent stats, the same units/spells that counter mass Marines will counter Marauders too.
For example Reavers, Storm, Zealots, Lurkers, Ensnare, Plague etc..
I don´t think mass Marines + Marauders will be viable all game long. If the enemy races have proper ways of countering this, then Terran MUST add in other units into their mix. Just as we see in TvP where Terran opens Bio: It works, but later on they must get Tanks + Vessels. Maybe Vikings. If they don¨t, Protoss will get an insane advantage with Reavers, Storm, Archons etc.


Conclusion: A modified version of the Marauder would be the needed extra punch to Bio in all match-ups.
If we are careful with the balance, Marauders will not break the game.

Ok Sumadin. I gave you a fair chance. I examined the possibilities of this unit.
Now it is up to the judges who read this thread:
- Thoughts on this?
- Would this be a much needed piece of the puzzle?
- Is this good enough in theory to make it worth trying in the game?!
- Possible adjustements to the above?

The fundamental question is;
Shall we try to balance the game with the Marauder in it,
or shall we try to balance the game without the Marauder?
Creator of Starbow
SolidSMD
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium408 Posts
June 30 2013 23:56 GMT
#6256
I am against, sorry. It's either gonna end up as an expensive marine or a sc2-like marauders that just breaks everything.
Working on Starbow!
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9390 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-01 00:15:13
July 01 2013 00:00 GMT
#6257
On July 01 2013 08:43 Kabel wrote:
The topic that ruins my sleep

Sumadin, you haunt me. In every game you say "Bio without Marauders will never ever work."
I say: "Pffftt... nonsens."
You continue.
I continue.
Convinced that I am right in this matter.
But I have been wrong so many times before.
So I have decided to give your constant echo a chance.
I sat down with pen and paper and pondered over some solutions.

Lets play with the thought:
What would happen with the game if the Marauder, after all, was added to the game in some modified version?

Problems I see right away:
- A-move into Lurker lines would be too good.
- Would still not make bio work in TvT since Spider mines + Tanks are so brutal
- Bio would still be hard countered by Reavers
- Would force Force Field back into the game. Otherwise Stalkers would not stand a chance
- Big blobs of Marauders just stimming and killing everything...

Must it be like this?
Is it possible to adjust the Marauder so it fits into the game and actually adds something good to the gameplay?

A potential solution:

Marauder
Cost 75/25 <--- (Cheaper than in SC2!)
Build time 30-35 seconds
HP 80 <--- (125 in SC2)
Armored
Armor 1
Damage 8 vs all, ca 12-14 vs armored (Compare to SC2 where they deal 10 vs all, 20 vs armored!)
Attack cooldown 1.5 seconds
Speed 2.25
Range 4 or 5.
Require tech lab?

Ok, what would these stats do?
- Lurkers 4 shot them, so A-move into them would still be hard. (As it should be!)
- They are cost efficent vs Stalkers, and can actually apply pressure vs P early, but they are NOT insanely strong!
- They would help Terran early Bio stronger in TvT, since Marauders would be able to fight vs the early Vultures/Tanks.
(It would be harder once Terran reaches a high enough number of Siege tanks.)

What units would Marauders do extra damage versus?
- Tanks, Goliaths, Marauders, Stalkers, Archons, Reaver, Queen, Lurker, Ultralisk, Structures (including Static defence...)
The extra toughness from the Marauders would help Terran bio to apply pressure vs all races.

What countes the Marauder?
- Tanks, Spider mines, Marines, Zealots, Storm, Reaver, Lurker, Hydra, Zergling, Flying units.

But what about TvT? Marauders will die just like Marines when they attack into Siege tanks...

- Well, sieged Siege tanks, Spider mines and Lurkers are supposed to be strong at that area.
But if we want Marauders to NOT be completely worthless, maybe some kind of upgrade can be added that reduces splash damage by a value. This would make them able to survive 2-shots from a Reaver, 3-shots from a tank, 2 spider mines etc. Still not super strong in a straight up fight, but not ridiculously fragile like Marines...

What would the total picture of Bio be?
- Marines are low HP, high DPS.
- Reaper are fast, fragile, strong vs light units. (Especially with splash upgrade.)
- Marauders are high HP, decent DPS vs armored. (Best bio alternative vs armored units.)
- Medics are supporter. Heal and can use Matrix on any unit.
- Ghosts are disable/harassment.

Maybe stats must be modified a little bit so we reach this scenario:
- Marauders have best DPS vs armored.
- Reapers have best DPS vs light.
- Marines have best DPS vs "medium" units. (For example lower their damage vs all from 6 to 5.)

The optimal scenario would be if each bio unit was truly useful for different purposes.
Otherwise Marines might still be the strongest bio counter versus every unit since they have superior DPS vs everything!

But what about the larger gameplay picture? Would this not break everything?


Are blobs of Marines unstoppable? I would say no.
If we keep the Marauder at decent stats, the same units/spells that counter mass Marines will counter Marauders too.
For example Reavers, Storm, Zealots, Lurkers, Ensnare, Plague etc..
I don´t think mass Marines + Marauders will be viable all game long. If the enemy races have proper ways of countering this, then Terran MUST add in other units into their mix. Just as we see in TvP where Terran opens Bio: It works, but later on they must get Tanks + Vessels. Maybe Vikings. If they don¨t, Protoss will get an insane advantage with Reavers, Storm, Archons etc.


Conclusion: A modified version of the Marauder would be the needed extra punch to Bio in all match-ups.
If we are careful with the balance, Marauders will not break the game.

Ok Sumadin. I gave you a fair chance. I examined the possibilities of this unit.
Now it is up to the judges who read this thread:
- Thoughts on this?
- Would this be a much needed piece of the puzzle?
- Is this good enough in theory to make it worth trying in the game?!
- Possible adjustements to the above?


I am kinda in the same booth as you are as I don't believe that maurauders in sc2 adds any extra elements to the game besides balancining bio in various matchups. You simply micro marines similarly to how you micro maurauders in every situation (except against banelings). At this point though, it feels like there are so many problems with the bio viability that it may just be easier to implement some kind of modified version as you suggested Kabel..

When that is said, I don't think that suggeston can work. Blink stalkers will likely still tear through it. For maurauders to do damage vs blink stalkers they need at least 5-6 range and concussive shell (with stim likely). 4-5 range with 80 HP and no concussive shell won't work.

Maybe consider this; 4 range, 11 damage vs armored, 8 vs light, 80 HP but like a 25% damage reduction against ranged attacks. This will make the DPS of the stalkers against maurauders quite bad. So a protoss player massing blink stalkers early midgame will be punished unless he manually is capable of target firing marines while avoiding taking damage from the maurauders (which will be ridicilously difficult). Instead, I think he will find it neccesary to mix in more zealots. Zealots will now be a stronger meatshield as the average damage of the bio force against zealots have been reduced.

But the marine/maurauder vs stalker/zealot battle will (unlike in sc2) be a quite fair matchup and micro is heavily rewarded for both players. The terran player will try to target fire the stalkers with the mauruaders and the zealots with the marines while using the maurauders as meatshield while simultanously kiting.
Protoss will be trying to avoid maurauder target firing with stalkers, possibly block the pathes with the zealots or use some interesting stalker blink micro.

Even though I also expect that the damage reduction will work against reavers and lurkers, I don't think the maurauder (with those stats) will be anywhere near strong to to just attack-move against them.
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-01 00:26:18
July 01 2013 00:13 GMT
#6258
Yeah in terms of uniqueness, Marauders and Marines overlap. I generally do not like when units feel similar, especially in the way they are controlled. They do not add any extra elements either,,, It is kinda a balance band aid solution.. : /

But after all, would this unit make the match-ups, balance and parts of the gameplay better?

If so, what stats can be possible?

(I know this discussion emerged late in the development, but I can not drop it completely, due to Sumadins constants comments ^^ )

Ps. I do NOT say I will force the Marauder into the game. I just play with the possibility.

But the marine/maurauder vs stalker/zealot battle will (unlike in sc2) be a quite fair matchup and micro is heavily rewarded for both players. The terran player will try to target fire the stalkers with the mauruaders and the zealots with the marines while using the maurauders as meatshield while simultanously kiting.
Protoss will be trying to avoid maurauder target firing with stalkers, possibly block the pathes with the zealots or use some interesting stalker blink micro.


IF we manage to reach an interesting scenario like this,,, well,, what would we lose?
Creator of Starbow
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9390 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-01 00:33:51
July 01 2013 00:30 GMT
#6259
On July 01 2013 09:13 Kabel wrote:
Yeah in terms of uniqueness, Marauders and Marines overlap. I generally do not like when units feel similar, especially in the way they are controlled. They do not add any extra elements either,,, It is kinda a balance band aid solution.. : /

But after all, would this unit make the match-ups, balance and parts of the gameplay better?

If so, what stats can be possible?

(I know this discussion emerged late in the development, but I can not drop it completely, due to Sumadins constants comments ^^ )

Ps. I do NOT say I will force the Marauder into the game. I just play with the possibility.
Show nested quote +

But the marine/maurauder vs stalker/zealot battle will (unlike in sc2) be a quite fair matchup and micro is heavily rewarded for both players. The terran player will try to target fire the stalkers with the mauruaders and the zealots with the marines while using the maurauders as meatshield while simultanously kiting.
Protoss will be trying to avoid maurauder target firing with stalkers, possibly block the pathes with the zealots or use some interesting stalker blink micro.


IF we manage to reach an interesting scenario like this,,, well,, what would we lose?


I think the only real potential downside is whether it will be too good vs lurkers. Against lurkers it will have an effective HP of 100, a damage of 11 and a range of 4. Since lurkers aren't particularly good vs terran at the moment, an indirect nerf may not be optimal. But if SV's gets nerfed somehow as well, then it may be okay afterall.

And btw, at this point I think we can just remove the ghost from the game. We could, however, consider to keep the nuke in the game somehow.
Crazy idea: What about giving a modified version of it to the BC? That will make the BC an interesting unit in the late game.
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
July 01 2013 00:44 GMT
#6260
And btw, at this point I think we can just remove the ghost from the game. We could, however, consider to keep the nuke in the game somehow.
Crazy idea: What about giving a modified version of it to the BC? That will make the BC an interesting unit in the late game.


Woah, I think both you and me needs to sleep at this point...
Creator of Starbow
Prev 1 311 312 313 314 315 537 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Sunny Lake Cup #1
CranKy Ducklings121
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 197
Livibee 87
Nina 67
CosmosSc2 61
Vindicta 47
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 69
Icarus 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever51
League of Legends
Cuddl3bear3
Counter-Strike
fl0m2048
Stewie2K200
Other Games
summit1g8723
tarik_tv4596
Day[9].tv1359
shahzam813
JimRising 484
C9.Mang0247
ViBE247
ROOTCatZ12
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV40
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta38
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4920
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur137
Other Games
• Scarra1954
• Day9tv1359
Upcoming Events
LiuLi Cup
8h 41m
Online Event
12h 41m
BSL Team Wars
16h 41m
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Online Event
1d 8h
SC Evo League
1d 9h
Online Event
1d 10h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 12h
CSO Contender
1d 14h
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 15h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
SC Evo League
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Dewalt vs Team Bonyth
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
3 days
RotterdaM Event
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
PiGosaur Monday
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Mini vs TBD
Soma vs sSak
WardiTV Summer Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-08-13
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.