| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
HeadlessWonder
United States1096 Posts
I preferred WCS 2012 a lot more, would be perfect imo if they leveled out the seeding more (as in, each country sends X to regional finals, each region sends X to World Finals. Not "you get 3 and you get 9 and you get 1 etc) Sure, it wouldn't be the best players. But isn't WCS meant to grow the world scene? | ||
|
Sjokola
Netherlands800 Posts
And if we would have region locked wcs am we would get to see new American talent. There's no way to break out via wcs AM this way. We also have to understand that this is a site for dedicated star craft fans. Off course a lot of forum goers here want only to see the best sc. But that's not how you become an e-sport. I believe most casuals don't care to much about kr vs kr battles in wcs am. But seeing your local heroes duke it out vs players from all around the world 3 times a year would be great. And for the people who want to only see the best games: a region lock would make wcs korea even more stacked resulting in better games. | ||
|
omisa
United States494 Posts
Personally I like watching koreans play starcraft so having them play in all the leagues dosent really bother me too much. I can, however, see why having koreans beat up on everyone else might not be much fun for others to sit and watch for multiple seasons. | ||
|
Survivor61316
United States470 Posts
| ||
|
TaishiCi
Korea (South)211 Posts
For everyone that is trying to disguise their xenophobia through bullshit reasons, just know that Koreans leaving EU/NA WCS would mean the gap will continue to grow even larger than before. ROLF stomps all day! | ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
Play only 2 seasons and have more local/lan/regional tournaments. As much as I've loved having WCS to watch, I feel like it dominates everything but the occasional DH/IEM. | ||
|
scares
Germany239 Posts
On September 28 2013 17:39 DusTerr wrote: Just name it Blizzard Championship Series "West", "North/Central" and "East". Play only 2 seasons and have more local/lan/regional tournaments. As much as I've loved having WCS to watch, I feel like it dominates everything but the occasional DH/IEM. Or make WCS team focused and bring back the many "smaller" or whatever you want to call them events and make one huge push for blizzcon as the blizz individual tournament or something (if needed at all). Just an idea maybe it's crap but I think a team league as constant content would be kinda cool and you could then keep having lots of iem, dreamhack, redbull, MLG, chinese things (NSL i think was one) and maybe also some korean events aside from gsl (even though just having everyone back in gsl would also be cool with stuff like the super tournament) just an idea though. | ||
|
borussia1871
Belgium23 Posts
| ||
|
Luiwtf
England217 Posts
The way it is currently I don't really care about WCS KR because it's missing certain players, I don't care about NA/EU because it's mostly bad players and I don't care about the global finals because of the lack of prep time and inclusion of bad players/lack of better players from WCS KR. | ||
|
Janko
Slovenia28 Posts
| ||
|
TheHansBecker
United States117 Posts
| ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9109 Posts
| ||
|
rpddropshot
United States82 Posts
On September 28 2013 07:04 HeadlessWonder wrote: If the highest quality of games is what people are really after, you should be arguing for getting rid of wcs altogether. The highest quality of games would involve sending Taeja, Jaedong, Alive etc. back to Korea to compete in GSL, not beating on AM players and lesser Koreans. Exactly. You can't have one true premier league if you already have 3 premier leagues. | ||
|
glaresc
31 Posts
| ||
|
desRow
Canada2654 Posts
On September 26 2013 19:06 KristofferAG wrote: Not sure. I would never watch NA, and probably never watch EU either. The prize pools would have to be changed, I don't see why the NA winner would get the same as KR winner, for example. Dat elitist attitude. Take a look at the current LCS format and the winning recipe. Personally I think WCS KR needs to die and go back to OSL/GSL and make it Tier 1. | ||
|
pookums
151 Posts
On September 26 2013 19:44 Cyroch wrote: 1. If foreigners would only play amongst themselves for the whole year, I think it is possible to see an overall decrease in foreign skill. I don't understand this line of thinking? Is the assumption that the handful of official WCS matches against Koreans are making foreigners better? | ||
|
astray71
United States325 Posts
Sure there are people who you will watch (Huk, Demuslim, etc etc) but those are probably going to be the only games you'll watch. People complain about the number of Koreans but the quality of games will go drastically down if it's only Americans. Plus, what happens at all the season finals? Everyone from WCS NA gets trashed in the ro16. What happens at Blizzcon? All of the NA people that qualified get kicked around again. It makes perfect sense to not region lock. They get more viewers with high level Koreans spread out in the tournaments. Also, do you really think all of the players from NA should get to go to Blizzcon when their level of play is barely high enough to beat Code B level Koreans? | ||
|
tomastaz
United States976 Posts
| ||
|
Cheren
United States2911 Posts
On September 29 2013 10:30 tomastaz wrote: I don't know...I like seeing certain Korean players there but I agree there are too many there, but you can't just only let a few in and prevent the others. Conflicted. That's exactly what a region lock would do, let in the Koreans who are willing to move and keep out the others. | ||
|
WightyCity
Canada887 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
Escore
INu's Battles
Classic vs ByuN
SHIN vs ByuN
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Classic vs GgMaChine
Rogue vs Maru
WardiTV Invitational
IPSL
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
