atm terran can still make 1 unit and win the game but they wont nerf marines because then terran becomes to weakest race so i thing the game is balanced but marines still tilt me

kochanfe

Micronesia1338 Posts

October 17 2011 13:58 GMT

#163

Korean Terrans = OP
But otherwise the game is very balanced right now

jkos86

50 Posts

October 17 2011 13:58 GMT

#164

I agree zerg is the strongest, just lacking in top players. Zerg is always ahead on bases and hence always gets the defenders advantage. The maps are big enough such that a top zerg should be able to hold off any rushes and can go into macro mode. Once zerg goes 3base+ they have a insanely huge advantage.

7mk

Germany10157 Posts

October 17 2011 14:03 GMT

#165

On October 17 2011 22:58 jkos86 wrote:
I agree zerg is the strongest, just lacking in top players. Zerg is always ahead on bases and hence always gets the defenders advantage. The maps are big enough such that a top zerg should be able to hold off any rushes and can go into macro mode. Once zerg goes 3base+ they have a insanely huge advantage.

Zerg was always ahead on bases in BW too.. does that mean Zerg is imbalanced in BW?

"Once zerg goes 3base+ they have a insanely huge advantage."
what a silly statement lol

IGotPlayguuu

Italy660 Posts

October 17 2011 14:27 GMT

#166

at least now toss can't complain anymore...

JoeAWESOME

Sweden1080 Posts

October 17 2011 14:29 GMT

#167

I think they need to remake the game for Heart of the Swarm. A player should not be able to get away by only making 1 unit (Marine). Besides the fact that the marine is too strong I think the game is somewhat fine.

Zerg vs Terran / Protoss is the most exciting matchup due to the fact that the Z has to react and be as greedy as possible + Show Spoiler +

Idra vs Bomber series was amazing....

I also feel that the unites overall are too strong. Meaning that you are screwed if you choose the wrong tech tree vs the oponent. There are too much countering in the unit (mainly thinking about the + damage vs armored, + damage light).

Roeder

Denmark735 Posts

October 17 2011 14:41 GMT

#168

Terran massing 2 units still bothers me. I voted no.

Wrathsc2

United States2025 Posts

October 17 2011 14:46 GMT

#169

On October 17 2011 23:41 Roeder wrote:
Terran massing 2 units still bothers me. I voted no.

you mean like zerg masses lings and banelings? sigh

Xenclamz

United States4 Posts

October 17 2011 14:53 GMT

#170

yeah anyone who argues marines are op. well can't i just argue zerglings are op? both are t1 units. zerg uses zerglings start to finish. and their core is always involving a t1 unit. cant i say the say for zealots too? if you dont use zealots as a protoss your stalkers get killed in a heartbeat. if you make tanks and thors without marines how can you expect to survive massling? If you make zero lings and just roaches you are lacking any form of surround. IMO, the game is balanced fine. It was zerg bitching about being UP, when you have pros like stephano, idra, and nestea playing zerg the way it should be played. HuK and MC play protoss the way it should be played. And korean terrans know the proper way to play terran. the game is fine on balance.

Xenclamz

United States4 Posts

October 17 2011 14:55 GMT

#171

On October 17 2011 22:50 Reppin405 wrote:
atm terran can still make 1 unit and win the game but they wont nerf marines because then terran becomes to weakest race so i thing the game is balanced but marines still tilt me

before you whine about terran being overpowered, please at least use proper words such as Think* not thing.

Roeder

Denmark735 Posts

October 17 2011 14:55 GMT

#172

On October 17 2011 23:46 radiantshadow92 wrote:

Show nested quote +

you mean like zerg masses lings and banelings? sigh

You don't see anyone going lings+banelings only after +15 minutes.

All I'm saying is.. marines good, man.

On October 17 2011 23:55 Xenclamz wrote:

Show nested quote +

before you whine about terran being overpowered, please at least use proper words such as Think* not thing.

Before you post, please at least contribute with something.

Mr Showtime

United States1353 Posts

October 17 2011 14:56 GMT

#173

As a zerg player, I think PvT has been a little questionable, but MC and Huk proved that it is more balanced than what we've seen in the past. So a little I guess.

NeThZOR

South Africa7387 Posts

October 17 2011 15:00 GMT

#174

I believe that the game is pretty much balance right now. There are obviously things which look rather overpowered in the game, but I guess that they aren't really, as it is only a matter of opinion. Spellcasters need a small tweak I think, otherwise I am quite happy with the current state of the game. Nobody can argue that some race is stronger than the others just because of it's prominence in leagues such as the GSL. It is pretty obvious why most players in the GSL are Terrans, because many SC2 players' first choice of race is Terran. I do not exactly know why, but I think it has to do with the fact that the Terran race resembles our human race the most, and therefore many people are inclined to play as Terran.

Good job so far by Blizzard and let's hope that they'll leave the game alone for a while so that we may see how balance progresses.

ZerG_OverlorD

United States16 Posts

October 17 2011 15:00 GMT

#175

Zerg won IPL3 Toss won MLG Orlando... nobody is complaining about terran ^^

No opinion change I think game is balanced. Not completely balanced but balanced enough so everybody has equal opportunities throughout the races

Xenclamz

United States4 Posts

October 17 2011 15:12 GMT

#176

On October 17 2011 23:55 Roeder wrote:

Show nested quote +

You don't see anyone going lings+banelings only after +15 minutes.

All I'm saying is.. marines good, man.

Show nested quote +

Before you post, please at least contribute with something.

i did if you look above my post there.

TBone-

United States2309 Posts

October 17 2011 15:25 GMT

#177

On October 17 2011 13:39 thingULTRA wrote:
gsl is still all terran..... sigh

Well yeah, its so hard for different players to get shifted out of the gsl because of the format. It takes what, three months for a code s player to get knocked out of the entire gsl?

Zax19

Czech Republic1136 Posts

October 17 2011 15:29 GMT

#178

I'm not a fan of players "balancing" the game by inventing strategies rather than the developer fixing the game, so nothing has changed, we still need SC3.