I haven't read any of the game yet, just enough to know that there was a mislynch on Day 1 and then Holyflare was night killed.
Do I need to start doing things immediately, or can I take the time to read the thread (or at least part of it)?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 14:29 GMT
#1179
I haven't read any of the game yet, just enough to know that there was a mislynch on Day 1 and then Holyflare was night killed. Do I need to start doing things immediately, or can I take the time to read the thread (or at least part of it)? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 14:54 GMT
#1182
On April 13 2015 23:47 rsoultin wrote: Well, I've missed playing mafia, so I'm going to do things anyway, because it's fun.Show nested quote + On April 13 2015 23:29 Trfel wrote: Hello. I haven't read any of the game yet, just enough to know that there was a mislynch on Day 1 and then Holyflare was night killed. Do I need to start doing things immediately, or can I take the time to read the thread (or at least part of it)? lol o.0 what a strange question truffle how do you expect to do things if you don't read the thread? -shoos- come back when you have something case-builder xP Given the pregame (as of page 2), I would be less inclined to lynch plotspot. Though it's a bit late for that. On April 13 2015 23:48 Half the Sky wrote: I don't agree with this method of scum catching by saying how many scum are on each wagon, however I'm not at the level where I can definitively say that it is wrong. And I don't think that it is alignment indicative.Welcome Trfel. Town are on track for an ML D2. I'm taking the approach of evaluating each of the main wagons D1 with the working theory there are 2 scum on the plot wagon and one on the Stutters counter wagon. I evaluated the Stutters counterwagon last night with Tube and possibly Dwarf being suspect. I have Rasputin/others wanting to lynch me for faulty logic (namely my changing votes on Stutters 2m before EoD) without considering the possibly that 1) I can't consider all possibility simultaneously and 2) it being completely unreasonable to expect a detailed case with the scant amount of time left. I've explained it enough, so I'm filter diving the people on the plot wagon atm. A few questions about the game: What is the posting style of the game? Is it more conversational (aka "spammy", though I feel the two are significantly different), or is it a more slow, content-dense game? Is there enough information to work with, or does town need more posting? Any claims yet? Does town have capable and currently active leadership? Thanks! | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 15:12 GMT
#1188
Oh well, I guess there is no shortcut to reading the game. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 15:23 GMT
#1190
Anyway, I finally made it to the start of Day 1, so I can (hopefully) provide actual reads soon. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 15:29 GMT
#1192
![]() I'd better check my meta first, though. On an unrelated note: On April 10 2015 06:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I'm sad now Hey, im not at least the last one ![]() ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 15:38 GMT
#1194
On April 14 2015 00:36 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Well, because I'm the last one in the game.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 00:29 Trfel wrote: Hm, I might have a cool way to read Half the Sky. But if she really is scum here, maybe I should just not reveal it until next game ![]() I'd better check my meta first, though. On an unrelated note: On April 10 2015 06:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I'm sad now Hey, im not at least the last one ![]() ![]() Why you are sad ![]() Im happy ![]() But I'm getting happier because this metaread on Half the Sky seems to be reliable so far. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 15:44 GMT
#1195
On April 14 2015 00:38 Trfel wrote: Eh, never mind, it's not a very good read. Oh well, it was worth a try.Show nested quote + Well, because I'm the last one in the game.On April 14 2015 00:36 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: On April 14 2015 00:29 Trfel wrote: Hm, I might have a cool way to read Half the Sky. But if she really is scum here, maybe I should just not reveal it until next game ![]() I'd better check my meta first, though. On an unrelated note: On April 10 2015 06:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I'm sad now Hey, im not at least the last one ![]() ![]() Why you are sad ![]() Im happy ![]() But I'm getting happier because this metaread on Half the Sky seems to be reliable so far. Back to reading the game. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:14 GMT
#1201
Onegu's opening is just terrible. I'm pretty sure that he is scum here. Plotspot was obviously a new player trying to figure out how to play the game, if anything I would read plotspot's opening posts as slightly towny. And Onegu was so quick to jump on scumreading him. I'd definitely prefer to lynch Onegu than this weird lynch on Half the Sky for just changing her vote. One scum down, two to go. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:23 GMT
#1204
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:31 GMT
#1209
On April 14 2015 01:28 The Shining wrote: Hi again, The Shining. I know you really don't like replacements, and I apologize for this. I'll do my best to make it a non-issue.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 01:14 Trfel wrote: Onegu Onegu's opening is just terrible. I'm pretty sure that he is scum here. Plotspot was obviously a new player trying to figure out how to play the game, if anything I would read plotspot's opening posts as slightly towny. And Onegu was so quick to jump on scumreading him. I'd definitely prefer to lynch Onegu than this weird lynch on Half the Sky for just changing her vote. One scum down, two to go. Ok I'm back in thread. Bro am I high or did you just claim scum?? Didn't you replace Onegu? O_O | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:32 GMT
#1211
On April 14 2015 01:30 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: You can always read replacements based on the play of the player they replaced for, as they have the same role...Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 01:18 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: On April 14 2015 01:07 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 01:06 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: On April 14 2015 00:45 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 00:36 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: On April 14 2015 00:29 Trfel wrote: Hm, I might have a cool way to read Half the Sky. But if she really is scum here, maybe I should just not reveal it until next game ![]() I'd better check my meta first, though. On an unrelated note: On April 10 2015 06:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I'm sad now Hey, im not at least the last one ![]() ![]() Why you are sad ![]() Im happy ![]() what do you think of my case About Half the Sky? also lol if stutters dropped dead this second from a rare and crazy day 1 cancer bug who would you want to lynch? But I hate how there is replacements coming in. Holyflare didnt play long but how could you have readed him? Are those posts by Soren anymore valid? Same with Trfel. If they/one of them is mafia they like got 1 day and night advance where nobody can read them. Damn, I forgot The Shining ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:33 GMT
#1213
On April 14 2015 01:32 rsoultin wrote: If I owe you anything, it's a vote or the truth made to look like a joke o.0 -eyes truffle- more seriously, y'all both owe me reads xP -cracks whip- ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:36 GMT
#1215
On April 14 2015 01:35 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Of course. But that doesn't change anything?Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 01:32 Trfel wrote: On April 14 2015 01:30 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: You can always read replacements based on the play of the player they replaced for, as they have the same role...On April 14 2015 01:18 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: On April 14 2015 01:07 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 01:06 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: On April 14 2015 00:45 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 00:36 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: On April 14 2015 00:29 Trfel wrote: Hm, I might have a cool way to read Half the Sky. But if she really is scum here, maybe I should just not reveal it until next game ![]() I'd better check my meta first, though. On an unrelated note: On April 10 2015 06:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I'm sad now Hey, im not at least the last one ![]() ![]() Why you are sad ![]() Im happy ![]() what do you think of my case About Half the Sky? also lol if stutters dropped dead this second from a rare and crazy day 1 cancer bug who would you want to lynch? But I hate how there is replacements coming in. Holyflare didnt play long but how could you have readed him? Are those posts by Soren anymore valid? Same with Trfel. If they/one of them is mafia they like got 1 day and night advance where nobody can read them. Damn, I forgot The Shining ![]() But how do you know if they play same? I know that if somebody replaced me, they would act alot different. Read Onegu based on how you would expect Onegu to play, and what his style is. Read me based on how you would expect me to play, and what my style is. Then combine those two reads to reach your conclusion. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:41 GMT
#1217
I know, I'm so helpful. And it also appears that I have no ability whatsoever to read people fairly when I already know their alignment. Was hoping that would have changed.... | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:49 GMT
#1218
I need to get some lunch. Have fun. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 16:58 GMT
#1221
On April 14 2015 01:52 Stutters695 wrote: How serious I was feeling changed?Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 01:14 Trfel wrote: Onegu Onegu's opening is just terrible. I'm pretty sure that he is scum here. Plotspot was obviously a new player trying to figure out how to play the game, if anything I would read plotspot's opening posts as slightly towny. And Onegu was so quick to jump on scumreading him. I'd definitely prefer to lynch Onegu than this weird lynch on Half the Sky for just changing her vote. One scum down, two to go. Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 01:41 Trfel wrote: Well, so far, I'm townreading all of the dead people, and I'm townreading Onegu...... I know, I'm so helpful. And it also appears that I have no ability whatsoever to read people fairly when I already know their alignment. Was hoping that would have changed.... What changed in 27 minutes? Anyway, apparently you've been missing in action. It seems that I'm drawing everyone back to the thread. And now I really must eat food, so I will be back later. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 17:00 GMT
#1222
Please have mercy? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 20:00 GMT
#1235
On April 14 2015 04:59 Stutters695 wrote: I like how you ask for an answer while quoting my answer.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 01:58 Trfel wrote: On April 14 2015 01:52 Stutters695 wrote: How serious I was feeling changed?On April 14 2015 01:14 Trfel wrote: Onegu Onegu's opening is just terrible. I'm pretty sure that he is scum here. Plotspot was obviously a new player trying to figure out how to play the game, if anything I would read plotspot's opening posts as slightly towny. And Onegu was so quick to jump on scumreading him. I'd definitely prefer to lynch Onegu than this weird lynch on Half the Sky for just changing her vote. One scum down, two to go. On April 14 2015 01:41 Trfel wrote: Well, so far, I'm townreading all of the dead people, and I'm townreading Onegu...... I know, I'm so helpful. And it also appears that I have no ability whatsoever to read people fairly when I already know their alignment. Was hoping that would have changed.... What changed in 27 minutes? Anyway, apparently you've been missing in action. It seems that I'm drawing everyone back to the thread. And now I really must eat food, so I will be back later. Bump. Still want an answer. Sometimes I am serious. Other times I am constantly joking. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 20:05 GMT
#1237
On April 14 2015 05:03 Stutters695 wrote: As of page 14, he's the most obvious town in the game.I would disagree with that being an answer. Anyways, until I think of a better way to word that what do you think about prpl? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 20:25 GMT
#1240
On April 14 2015 05:17 Stutters695 wrote: I disagree with your assessment that page 14 was basically a decade ago. And I disagree with your scumread of prplhz. When I read his play, even from page 16, he is one of the two most influential players in the game (along with Soren333). He's constantly pushing things, not just asking questions. You claim he isn't doing anything, I disagree.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 05:09 Tubesock wrote: On April 14 2015 05:03 Stutters695 wrote: I would disagree with that being an answer. Anyways, until I think of a better way to word that what do you think about prpl? Are you being serious about asking Trfel why he changed his "scum read" on his slot he replaced into? I'm missing something. Reactions dawg. Just want to see what he'd say. Honestly, I've seen people make similar mistakes replacing in (I almost wrote a case on myself in WLIIA way back in the day after replacing in). Trfel: pg14 was basically a decade ago, do you disagree with my assessment? What do you make of HtS's case on you? Half the Sky's case is on Onegu, not me. I don't really care about it. I have two options: ignore it, or spam the thread yelling about something I don't really know about (which is extremely detrimental to town). If I feel that it would be beneficial to town for me to defend Onegu's play, I can and will do so, but now is definitely not the time for that. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 20:59 GMT
#1243
On April 14 2015 05:55 Half the Sky wrote: Uh, what gives you this idea? I mean, I'm sure it's technically possible, but it's also possible for a 50+ page filter Artanis to be mafia (Guardians). It's just extremely unlikely. There are only a small number of mafia players on this site who will actively lead the thread as mafia, and given what I've heard about prplhz's scum play (which seems to be in complete agreement with what you are saying), I feel that prplhz would almost never push the thread this much as scum.EBWOP - Trfel, you are making the conclusion that he is influential and that he pushes things, but he can certainly do this as mafia. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 21:05 GMT
#1244
Analysis #1: Pages 7-20 + Show Spoiler + On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote: i might or might not be scum any thoughts? On April 10 2015 06:15 Half the Sky wrote: These are the first two noteworthy posts that I found. To me, it seems that prplhz and Half the Sky were the first two players to start pushing the game forward. This makes them seem more towny. In particular, prplhz started pushing the game forward almost immediately.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 06:08 prplhz wrote: i'm around why not talk to me ![]() seriously everybody hates me and i haven't a clue why am i reallly such a horrible person I don't think you're horrible (read: scum)....yet ![]() However, I should share my meta point against Half the Sky here. Her tone is extremely confident and jovial. When she is town, her tone often seems to focus on working with others and playing alongside others. However, in her first mafia game (Newbie Mafia LX), she opened extremely confidently, referencing her own reads and desire to scumhunt. It's mostly an issue of confidence: as town, she tries to solve the game while constantly checking her work with that of others, while as scum she seems more willing to be completely independent and forceful. Still, this didn't line up with her opening in The Void Mafia (she was scum). I still feel that it is evidence against her, even if slight. It mostly depends on how she follows this up. On April 10 2015 06:21 Half the Sky wrote: Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 06:19 Bourneq wrote: Sorry again the phone.. It does not help me gain any information of any kind so I am not bothered. Not even a tone read? The comment leaves no impression you whatsoever? On April 10 2015 06:25 Half the Sky wrote: This progression looks very good from Half the Sky. The first quote looks quite bad to me, she seems to be trying to make Bourneq look bad. However, four minutes later she seemed clearly willing to help Bourneq adjust to TL Mafia (as she should be, and as is expected). Therefore, I can only conclude that the first quote had the same intention, of trying to probe for actual information, as well as being willing to work with a newer player. At this point, Half the Sky is a town lean.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 06:22 Bourneq wrote: I could not hear his tone over the internet. Okay, I think you could be taking me too literally. Let's try it this way. When I mention "tone read" does the fact that he's asking us this question, what does it make you think of him? That's what I am trying to ask. Prplhz gets a town lean as well for making an opening to start the discussion and then following through by voting someone who responds (in his eyes) in a scummy way. This isn't something that I expect from prplhz, or most mafia players, for that matter. Mafia doesn't really have incentive to immediately start pushing the thread forward. TheBloodyDwarf initially seems very inconsistent. This one's a bit complicated. On April 10 2015 06:15 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I played Starcraft 2 arcade mafia once. And that was enough to know that it is a completely different game from this. Knowledge and skills from one game do not transfer to the other in any way whatsoever. The best thing for TheBloodyDwarf to do for TL Mafia is to learn to play from the ground up, because SC2 arcade mafia is simply a different game.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 06:13 Half the Sky wrote: On April 10 2015 06:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Hey, im not at least the last one ![]() Are you new to TL (mafia) too? Welcome either way. First time playing. My only experience is SC2 arcade mafia that im playing right now while typing this ![]() TheBloodyDwarf seems to be inconsistent about how he portrays himself. He often points to his past experience with SC2 arcade mafia as excuses for his actions (I shouldn't need to provide quotes for this), such as the above quote and the discussion he has with prplhz about the mechanics of roles in SC2 arcade mafia. The inconsistency is that he keeps coming back to the SC2 arcade mafia experience, instead of adapting to a new game. On April 10 2015 07:02 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: This quote shows that TheBloodyDwarf realizes that TL Mafia and SC2 Mafia are different games. How does he act on this knowledge?This is like my SC2 Mafia games. Somebody suddenly randomly votes somebody else ![]() On April 10 2015 06:39 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 06:33 prplhz wrote: (by the way, i'm not entirely sure i understand what you're saying but i really don't think that's how vigilantes and cops work here) Yeah, I readed rules. They work differently than this game. On April 10 2015 07:21 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: First, he says that he read the rules. But he only later realized how the lynch works (presumably after reading the vote count), and still didn't realize that you aren't supposed to edit posts. If he did actually read the rules, he clearly didn't read them very carefully at all. And he ought to recognize that this works differently from SC2 mafia, and read the rules carefully. This doesn't make sense from a town perspective.Oh this is insta lynch for guy who gets most votes? I mean, no trial On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: This statement is obviously anti-town. It doesn't make TheBloodyDwarf scum (and by itself isn't alignment indicative), but keep it in mind.Wow Soren is really digging old things :D Cant we let past be past? On April 10 2015 08:04 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: So, basically, TheBloodyDwarf intends to do nothing until there is information with which to scum hunt. However, he also dissuades others from analyzing the game. This might be somewhat valid in a role-heavy environment like SC2 mafia, however, by this point if The BloodyDwarf hasn't read the rules and doesn't realize that TL Mafia and SC2 mafia are different games, he deserves to be lynched. I can't really scumread him for saying that he can't scumhunt at this point of the game, but telling other people to stop analyzing "old" information (two hours old) is really bad.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 08:00 Tubesock wrote: On April 10 2015 07:54 prplhz wrote: On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Wow Soren is really digging old things :D Cant we let past be past? you should really just answer him and answer breshke why you are voting me Soren is looking good. Dwarf, uh not so much. Dwarf, you going to scumhunt at all? Prplhz, how do you read Half The Sky? She seems different this game from what I've seen of her in the past. Seems towny to me, but to be fair, I've only seen her in 1 scum game and I thought she was strong town then? Not much with what to scumhunt ![]() However, at this point, his play is almost falling under the "too scummy to be scum" category. While not helping town, his play doesn't push a mafia agenda that heavily (there was no reasonable way for him to expect Soren333 to actually stop playing the game because of his request). While objectively bad, his play is consistent, and I'm not very inclined to scumread him seriously any more. On April 10 2015 08:19 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: This quote summarizes it perfectly. He's waiting for people to provide evidence, while ignoring evidence that people do provide, and he's read the rules enough to know that the night phase won't provide sufficient evidence to make up for analysis. But he now clearly realizes this, so if he is town, his play will step up from here. Unfortunately, he didn't come back through page 20.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 08:15 Soren333 wrote: On April 10 2015 07:53 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Wow Soren is really digging old things :D Cant we let past be past? Digging up old things? Judging from your second sentence I can safely assume that you're implicitly implying that me digging old things is bad? Why is it bad? Why let past be past? First of, I wouldn't call them old things. Game started and I haven't posted till now, therefore I shall offer my thoughts as I play the catch up game. And secondly, let past be past means you're just going to ignore everything that everyone has already said. In that case, how will you evaulaute someone's actions and words and determine if they are scum or not? Oh, maybe I have played too much arcade mafia. I have used to people bringing "evidence to table" and then game really starts. But well, looks like I have to start reading posts more carefully :D Prplhz again sees something suspicious (plotsplot's alphabetical vote) and focuses on it. This gives me more reason to townread him. On April 10 2015 08:11 Breshke wrote: Breshke looks good. This is a good comment and good analysis of prplhz's early play. However, I don't really like his analysis of TheBloodyCobbler (though that is partly due to the mechanics of votes in SC2 mafia).Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 07:46 Soren333 wrote: On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote: i might or might not be scum any thoughts? You're kidding me. That's scummy as hell. What kind of person says "oh hey guys huehuehue I might or might not be scum derp". Vote: prplhz Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 07:50 Soren333 wrote: On April 10 2015 06:19 Bourneq wrote: On April 10 2015 06:16 Half the Sky wrote: On April 10 2015 06:14 Half the Sky wrote: That said, what do you think of prplhz's comment? EBWOP at Bourneq - specifically this: On April 10 2015 06:06 prplhz wrote: i might or might not be scum any thoughts? Sorry again the phone.. It does not help me gain any information of any kind so I am not bothered. You need to question the motivation behind his question. What do you think is prplzl's motivation behind asking that question? I'm intrested that you find this scummy yet go on to tell someone to think about motivation. Could you explain to me what motivation scum would have to post this? He seemes to just be drawing attention to himself which i do not think is scummy. Also @Thebloodydwarf I asked about your vote because random voting is w/e but im under the understanding that it is done to apply pressure. Yet you voted someone who was around and posting and actively trying to produce content with people. This leads me to think that you simply voted to just fit in with other people doing it. I suppose I have to retract my earlier townread of Breshke. He made a good townread on someone, and is defending them. However, his push on TheBloodyCobbler isn't very good, and he doesn't seem terribly interested in investigating any of the other people yet. Interested to see how he goes forward. His decision that Ace1312's entrance timing isn't alignment indicative looks good for him. But he needs to find another suspicious thing to push, and quickly, or he could be scum. On April 10 2015 08:32 Bourneq wrote: This almost seems too paranoid to be scum...The fact that you wrote a fairly pointless sentance stating nothing and then following it up with a question what we think about you not stating anything makes me belive you are either a maffia trying to blend in by drawing attention to yourself so we would think you are not maffia since that would be stupid if you did that as maffia. OR you're a town trying to get a discussion going to give us more information. But voting for me to be lynched out of me not making any quick judgements on you seems harsh and a stupid thing to do as town. On April 10 2015 09:09 prplhz wrote: This is actually a good point, though. Unfortunately, it isn't enough to lynch Bourneq yet, seeing as he is a new player.like i have zero reason to think bourneq is town. he doesn't seem to be doing any sort of thinking about the game unless prodded. On April 10 2015 09:28 Half the Sky wrote: I'm not sure that I like this read. To me, Onegu's play has a bunch of good things, and a bunch of bad things (which Half the Sky doesn't mention at all). Furthermore, Half the Sky is saying that she liked an argument that Onegu made that is proven to be completely incorrect. This read feels incomplete, and her followup isn't much better.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 08:12 Onegu wrote: My point was he made the post to clairfy before you made that post. He votes talks about something then clairifies why he voted ace. Then you asked him the question. I like this observation from Onegu, and his filter in general so far. His claiming VT is something he routinely does as town. Townlean (and partially based on meta). Then Half the Sky scumreads Bourneq and TheBloodyDwarf. While these players haven't been acting towny, there are good reasons to not scumread them at this time. And Half the Sky also scumreads prplhz (!), which seems very strange to me. On April 10 2015 06:15 Half the Sky wrote: She doesn't think that prplhz is scum after his first few posts. Before this, she said that prplhz's initial statement (could be scum, could be town) doesn't make sense from either perspective.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 06:08 prplhz wrote: i'm around why not talk to me ![]() seriously everybody hates me and i haven't a clue why am i reallly such a horrible person I don't think you're horrible (read: scum)....yet ![]() On April 10 2015 10:07 Half the Sky wrote: And then this? I'm not sold.I really did not like his entrance or his first few posts. On April 10 2015 09:43 plotspot wrote: Oh my.......... Maybe now I know why plotsplot was lynched.So If I say I like the people I like to win regardless whether they are mafia or town, what would you guys be able to read? Breshke reconsiders his TheBloodyDwarf read before anyone else. He's actually looking quite towny right now. And no, Half the Sky doesn't look more towny as scum... I know rsoultin won't like this, but she's actually looking suspicious. She comes in without providing any reads or thoughts at all, then continually commenting on something that is pointless, and then complaining that no one is talking to her. There's plenty to talk about, I've come up with a whole lot already. I understand it if rsoultin is still reading and analyzing, but her complaining about the thread activity while doing nothing herself is suspicious. Tubesock is a solid null. He made a few okay reads, but he hasn't done anything impressive yet. I believe that leaves me here. Town Breshke prplhz Null Half the Sky Bourneq Tubesock TheBloodyDwarf Scum Lean rsoultin It is possible that I am overestimating the amount that prplhz has done. To me, it feels like through page 20, he did the most work out of everyone. However, I note that as of the time I joined the game, he had the longest filter, which supports this. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 21:16 GMT
#1246
On April 14 2015 06:11 Half the Sky wrote: I'm mostly going off of what others (particularly rsoultin) have said (before this game began). I have experience playing with town prplhz, and in this game, he's been noticeably better than I remember him being in games where he was town. Because of this, I don't feel that I need to check his scum meta, it's clear enough already.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 05:59 Trfel wrote: On April 14 2015 05:55 Half the Sky wrote: Uh, what gives you this idea? I mean, I'm sure it's technically possible, but it's also possible for a 50+ page filter Artanis to be mafia (Guardians). It's just extremely unlikely. There are only a small number of mafia players on this site who will actively lead the thread as mafia, and given what I've heard about prplhz's scum play (which seems to be in complete agreement with what you are saying), I feel that prplhz would almost never push the thread this much as scum.EBWOP - Trfel, you are making the conclusion that he is influential and that he pushes things, but he can certainly do this as mafia. Here's what I was getting at. I didn't recall whether you have ever played with prplhz and were coming up with that conclusion yourself or whether you were just going off of what others said. Especially as Stutters paints a slightly different perspective of his scumgame than what I'm recalling. If there is actual reason to be suspicious of him (possibly the points that Stutters695 made about prplhz's end of day actions, which I'm not in a position to evaluate at this time), I can revisit him later. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 22:47 GMT
#1253
On April 14 2015 07:43 jarjarbinks wrote: Hi, jarjarbinks! It has been a while. And with good reason, if we played again sooner, I probably would have lynched you out of pure spite.got in and read up lol hey Trf.....sooooo....its been awhile...lol first readthrough of hts's case was pretty good. really looking forward to the other two. also i'm pretty sure Trf's first case is longer than at least two people's filters in this game lol | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 23:09 GMT
#1256
+ Show Spoiler + On April 10 2015 14:13 rsoultin wrote: Rsoultin still strikes me as surprisingly useless. I don't like this at all. Rsoultin has also missed some jokes/sarcasm, something I never expect from her and don't really see (she is a linguist, after all). And she misinterpreted one of Ace1312's posts, despite his intent being clear.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 14:09 Tubesock wrote: On April 10 2015 13:58 rsoultin wrote: mmm i guess it's possible given how little prp's done, tube, but his scum game (see titanic) is horribad...he'd have to have improved his scumgame majorly It's that bad? I didn't read Titanic. So many games so little time. Man, I have a case of vet worship or something. I think everyone is really good who's played a few games. Have any reads yet? strong ones? nah still not liking hts cause she didn't make me want to lynch her from the get-go, but that's kinda shit-tier you know? i just always seem to get her alignment wrong early prp is prob town onegu started more try-hard than i'm used to and i don't know what to think about it yet don't like ace's wall post to sheep bloodydwarf sentiment and say nothing about prp i have a specific towntell for you that i haven't seen yet lol hrum...those are the things that stuck out to me, really...i'm focusing on players i know first On April 10 2015 14:45 rsoultin wrote: If you're scumreading Ace1312 for this, then you probably need his scumhunting 101 lesson.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 14:34 Ace1312 wrote: On April 10 2015 14:27 rsoultin wrote: Prp could be town and trying to make a bad joke. It was early so it's possible. But prp could also be scum trying to throw everyone off by making a bad joke. Needs further looking into. that's not how your post read? that looks like a flat-out nullread to me more to the point, it's not even something that you can figure out just by "looking into it further" how do you intend to figure out if the bad joke comes from town or scum? Best way is to keep a close watch on prp and see if other things are even slightly scummy sounding. If a lot of statements seem to be coming off that way then it might be best to lynch. ... lol i feel like you just tried to give me a scumhunting 101 lesson >< On April 10 2015 14:57 jarjarbinks wrote: This makes no sense at all.... In this very post, plotspot is treating his vote carefully and weighing his options. This simply isn't that alignment indicative. But rsoultin agreed with it. Ugh.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 08:12 plotspot wrote: I'm considering changing my vote to Onegu. He's playing like a fucktard. But of course I'm still not sure whether it's his strategy or him inadvertently not "getting" some of the things. This is what first bothered me. His early vote (in my mind) shows that he doesn't think early votes matter much. Then onegu scumreads him and early votes him. His reaction? SUPER SENSATIVE. Maybe it isn't fair to judge plot and dwarf differently, and I am. But I don't think he would have expected Ace to react that sensitively to his vote. On April 10 2015 15:10 rsoultin wrote: Rsoultin, what have you been doing... Breshke is a good townread here. I'm starting to wonder if rsoultin is analyzing the game at all. I have tons of small points for why rsoultin is scum, so I'll stop listing them now, and wait for her to start making bigger reads.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 15:07 Breshke wrote: Rso am I boring or have i not posted enough for you to get a read on me yet havent posted enough lol I am truly impressed by how much TheBloodyDwarf misunderstands the rules, after supposedly reading them multiple times. He seems so defensive as well (page 23), but I suppose it's warranted, given the current votes on him. At least he acknowledges that he needs to analyze what people say, so I look forward to that. Bourneq's re-entry to the thread seems lackluster. He continues to only provide reads when prompted to do so, and here: On April 10 2015 21:24 Bourneq wrote: Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 21:20 prplhz wrote: On April 10 2015 21:17 Bourneq wrote: On April 10 2015 21:11 prplhz wrote: nothing he is prodded he shows up and says whatever more of the same Meanwhile you have mainly been pushing a lynch on me since first days page based soley on me answering to your vote on me. From reading your filter you seem to have mainly been defending yourself in the same fashion when having been voted on and making jokes and from what I can tell not contributing that much to getting some serious mafia reads. and what do you make of that? Obviously I am leaning towards scum on you. On April 10 2015 21:26 Bourneq wrote: He seems to go out of his way to not upset prplhz. This is hard to see from a town perspective, to go back later and tell prplhz what he needs to do to get the scumread removed.Untill you start making reasonable arguments and acctualy doing something productive. On April 10 2015 23:40 Stutters695 wrote: I don't really like this post at all. Breshke didn't really defend prplhz at all (I suppose you could stretch his post to call it a defense, but it isn't really). He doesn't really say anything about Breshke's play, but scumreads him anyway. A bit suspicious.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 23:01 Half the Sky wrote: On April 10 2015 22:59 Stutters695 wrote: So this game started apparently. What's up guys? Good afternoon! Are you caught up yet? If so do you have any reads or thoughts? Yep. Initial thoughts, I don't like Breshke so far. His defense of prpl is completely unnecessary and it is far too early to be sure of that. His vote on dwarf had no reasoning before he's back to null on him as well. I haven't checked his meta, but it gives off a first time scum vibe. He's so afraid of revealing something that he shouldn't know, he's being active without saying anything really. Phone posting, so these take a hot minute to type up. Phone posting so these take me a while. On April 11 2015 01:10 rsoultin wrote: This is a good point, I brought it up in my last post. Rsoultin is starting to look better for this.EBWOP: fixed the craptastic coding -_- Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 06:15 Half the Sky wrote: On April 10 2015 06:08 prplhz wrote: i'm around why not talk to me ![]() seriously everybody hates me and i haven't a clue why am i reallly such a horrible person I don't think you're horrible (read: scum)....yet ![]() Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 09:35 Half the Sky wrote: On April 10 2015 08:41 plotspot wrote: prplhz is 100% town. I can smell it.^^ I'm not sure I agree with this. I didn't like his entrance or his opening at all. I need to take a closer look at his filter. Scumreads so far on Bourneq and prplhz (pending filter recaps) and BD. Townleans on Soren, Onegu. i don't see you ever explain this read change on prp? you clearly were fine with his entrance in the beginning... lol and i was wrong about the bloody-centric feel, which is a shame cause that was making me lean town on you lol >< On April 11 2015 01:11 Bourneq wrote: I actually like this post. I know that he mostly scumreads for inactivity, but this is significantly better than the play that he's showed up to this point. And his reasoning generally makes sense, and I can easily see how he arrives at the conclusions that he does. I'm assuming that this is one of the main reasons that Bourneq wasn't lynched on Day 1.here comes my reads Stutters is extremely suspicious too me seeing he has next to no activity in the game what so ever. I am getting generaly good vibes from Breshke, he has been actively driving the conversation in reasonable directions judging by his filter. I dont like him calling dwarf lynchbait and still sticking with his vote however. Onegus attitude puzzles me. Saying he is not going to tryhard and just going to try to troll and have fun makes me think; mafia wanting to look town but his other posts have not given me mafia vibes so I am unsure here. rsoultin is annoying me with his emoticons lol. And calling people retarded is just retarded. Either tryhard mafia or not trying very hard town. Hts looks really town too me but I thinks he is one of the veterans so she could be playing a really good mafia. I would put my money on town for now. prpl is looking more and more scum to me. It was resonable to jump on me after my first few comments since they were weak but I have given my reasons and continuing with this crusade makes me belive he is scheming. I am certinatly the easiest target to harras given my inexperiance and poor response at the beginning of day 1. Plotspot is screaming scum to me but I am looking forward to what he has to say when he gets back from work or whatever his excuse was. jarjar could be mafia throwing reads about early to get in the good book but at the same time I have not seen enough from him to make any quick judgements so I would not place him in either alignment. Ace is extremely quiet and this makes me think mafia. If not mafia then a town not contributing. Either way he is high up on lynch list for me untill he makes his voice heard. Soren333 is looking very town too me. I like his resoning. I like the few posts from Tubesock but would like to hear more. I really like TBD's explenation of his behaviour but not reading the OP is really reckless and I would like fellow towns to know the rules and the pace of the game. But tbd seems as new as me at this so I will tread carefully here. Boy that took a long time to write up. As for myself I have been playing poorly even if I was scum or town. I have already posted my excuse but at least it has given me some insight into who draws what conclusion from what I have said. Some conclusions are way more reasonable than others. On April 11 2015 01:40 Tubesock wrote: I like this response too, as well as most of Tubesock's posts from this time. Tubesock is looking better now.Show nested quote + On April 11 2015 01:11 Bourneq wrote: here comes my reads Stutters is extremely suspicious too me seeing he has next to no activity in the game what so ever. I am getting generaly good vibes from Breshke, he has been actively driving the conversation in reasonable directions judging by his filter. I dont like him calling dwarf lynchbait and still sticking with his vote however. Onegus attitude puzzles me. Saying he is not going to tryhard and just going to try to troll and have fun makes me think; mafia wanting to look town but his other posts have not given me mafia vibes so I am unsure here. rsoultin is annoying me with his emoticons lol. And calling people retarded is just retarded. Either tryhard mafia or not trying very hard town. Hts looks really town too me but I thinks he is one of the veterans so she could be playing a really good mafia. I would put my money on town for now. prpl is looking more and more scum to me. It was resonable to jump on me after my first few comments since they were weak but I have given my reasons and continuing with this crusade makes me belive he is scheming. I am certinatly the easiest target to harras given my inexperiance and poor response at the beginning of day 1. Plotspot is screaming scum to me but I am looking forward to what he has to say when he gets back from work or whatever his excuse was. jarjar could be mafia throwing reads about early to get in the good book but at the same time I have not seen enough from him to make any quick judgements so I would not place him in either alignment. Ace is extremely quiet and this makes me think mafia. If not mafia then a town not contributing. Either way he is high up on lynch list for me untill he makes his voice heard. Soren333 is looking very town too me. I like his resoning. I like the few posts from Tubesock but would like to hear more. I really like TBD's explenation of his behaviour but not reading the OP is really reckless and I would like fellow towns to know the rules and the pace of the game. But tbd seems as new as me at this so I will tread carefully here. Boy that took a long time to write up. As for myself I have been playing poorly even if I was scum or town. I have already posted my excuse but at least it has given me some insight into who draws what conclusion from what I have said. Some conclusions are way more reasonable than others. I agree Breshke is town. I'm missing something with the scum for waffling bit. I am towning him for that specifically, so I'd like feedback on why that could be wrong. I'm not sure about Onegu either. But I think he's worth keeping around for a couple days as he will likely do something that will town/mafia him. Rsoultin was caught as scum a few games ago because her emoticon to words ratio was too low, so this cracks me up. Now you're scumming her for too high of a ratio. Ignoring emoticons and her use of the word "retarded" don't you think she's being more productive than most in the game? She's town. Agree on HTS. She has a few town posts, but again, I'm afraid of her. Prplhz. I'm nully town. You actually brought up some good points but it is pretty tainted with OMGUS. I do think it's weird he's so tunnelled on you. Haven't decided if that's mafia motivated or not. But my next point: Why is Plotspot SCREAMING scum to you? But you're not articulating it? Stuff like that makes Prplhz think you are scum. I liked Jarjar's posts too. I've been meaning to ask him if he's still using his algorithm (something I misslynched him for in my only game with him). Ace needs to step up. His giant posts basically said nothing but "don't kill me". He's my Dwarf alternate. He has a day to bleed town. So far I'm picking from these two. I've already spoken about the rest. On April 11 2015 02:22 Stutters695 wrote: And Stutters695 is looking a bit better as well. I'm still leaning scum on him a little, but this post seems to be in the right direction.Show nested quote + On April 11 2015 02:10 rsoultin wrote: On April 10 2015 23:40 Stutters695 wrote: On April 10 2015 23:01 Half the Sky wrote: On April 10 2015 22:59 Stutters695 wrote: So this game started apparently. What's up guys? Good afternoon! Are you caught up yet? If so do you have any reads or thoughts? Yep. Initial thoughts, I don't like Breshke so far. His defense of prpl is completely unnecessary and it is far too early to be sure of that. His vote on dwarf had no reasoning before he's back to null on him as well. I haven't checked his meta, but it gives off a first time scum vibe. He's so afraid of revealing something that he shouldn't know, he's being active without saying anything really. Phone posting, so these take a hot minute to type up. Phone posting so these take me a while. already quoted the post with the reasoning for his dwarf vote :/ he's not a newbie lol, i've played scum with him before. some meta points for bresh's scumgame: - he tends to be more decisive (when you already know alignments this is easier to do) - he tends to give a lot of townreads and few or no scumreads...and the scumreads are generally based on weak reasoning waffling is actually something he's frequently scumread for when he's town ^^ i'm more concerned with whether or not the reasoning behind his reads make sense (based on the second point) when determining his alignment Thanks, I don't mind the waffling except how he's doing it. I'm working today so I'm not really going to deal with meta right now, but I'll put it on the back burner. It's too early to tell for sure, but how he's playing reminds me a lot of myself in Basterd Mini. I'll read some previous games when I have time in front of a pc (probably tomorrow) and address it later. Currently, I wouldn't be comfortable listing him as town though. I don't have any posts to cite, since rsoultin is a primarily conversational player, but her play seems to be shaping up. She's focused on the game, and while nothing truly stood out, she's generally been in the right place. She goes back to a null read until she actually starts pushing something. On April 11 2015 03:01 prplhz wrote: And this seems really strange. TheBloodyDwarf shouldn't be a townread, since he hasn't actually done anything yet. He's proved that he's a noob, and that he wasn't expecting the game to be like this at all. That's fine, it doesn't make him scum, but it doesn't make him town either.dunno if you're my top townies right now but you seem alright and if you agree that's probably a good sign maybe bloodydwarf is my top town read but i'm not sheeping him On April 11 2015 03:01 Half the Sky wrote: I don't like this explanation. It actually does make sense from a town perspective, it provides something that people can comment on (and they did). For the first few minutes of the game, that's pretty good. And Half the Sky already said that it makes no sense from a mafia perspective. If this doesn't make sense from either a town or a mafia perspective, why does that make prplhz mafia here? Her post doesn't at all describe why prplhz is scum, she keeps saying "he could do this as scum". Half the Sky seems to have dropped off a bit, but I don't know if that's an actual trend or just a perception I get from reading in small chunks.[...]Also Rasputin, I didn't articulate it well (and Onegu also called me on it but I'm pretty sure I answered him) but at the time I scumread prp his first few posts, especially his first post was just out there. It doesn't make sense as a reaction test even. His next few posts didn't seem like there was much effort to dig much into Borneq and anyone would question an alphabetical vote from Ace, I can see him as scum or town doing that. On April 11 2015 03:05 prplhz wrote: This is yet another point on prplhz's favor. And no, this isn't an associative read. Two reasons. First is that scum doesn't really want to push against Half the Sky here, second is that he has good reasons for doing this (and I believe he is the first one to seriously push Half the Sky).##Vote Half the Sky I need to get dinner. I have some work to do after dinner, so I'm not sure when I'll be able to completely catch up with the thread, but I'll read when I can. Town prplhz Town Lean Breshke jarjarbinks? Tubesock Null rsoultin Bourneq (maybe a bit lower?) TheBloodyDwarf Scum Lean Half the Sky Stutters695 | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 13 2015 23:09 GMT
#1257
On April 14 2015 07:57 jarjarbinks wrote: Not so hilarious, that game still gives me nightmares....Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 07:47 Trfel wrote: On April 14 2015 07:43 jarjarbinks wrote: Hi, jarjarbinks! It has been a while. And with good reason, if we played again sooner, I probably would have lynched you out of pure spite.got in and read up lol hey Trf.....sooooo....its been awhile...lol first readthrough of hts's case was pretty good. really looking forward to the other two. also i'm pretty sure Trf's first case is longer than at least two people's filters in this game lol lol actually that was literally my last game xD Rso's in here, then shining replaces, then you replace lolz pretty hilarious lol | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 00:22 GMT
#1281
On April 14 2015 09:20 rsoultin wrote: What is it? What is it?##unvote trying something and nope i won't explain what it is ^^ | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 00:28 GMT
#1286
On April 14 2015 09:27 Half the Sky wrote: That game was a painful experience for us, please don't rub it in.......Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 09:24 rsoultin wrote: lol i don't disagree with you? it's the main thing that's been keeping me from voting him up to this point, just because...such a god-awful obviously bad way to play scum >< like i'd feel like the biggest imbecile on the planet if at end of game he ends up being scum just cause he's like the poster child for scummy play this game lol i'm just confused how you have a townread on him My first tinfoil hat theory this game: What if this game is like Down Under 2 where the mafia team is relatively inactive? Pass the tinfoil anyone? ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 00:56 GMT
#1300
I should play in newbie games more often! | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 00:57 GMT
#1302
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 01:00 GMT
#1305
On April 14 2015 09:57 Stutters695 wrote: Read my posts?Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 09:56 Trfel wrote: I must say, there are a ton of hilarious things in this thread ^^ I should play in newbie games more often! Who do you want to lynch? Go! If you want more than that, I could tell you, but why would you care? I haven't read the last 30 pages, which I'm sure contains a ton of extremely important information. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 01:29 GMT
#1323
On April 14 2015 10:26 prplhz wrote: This, it definitely helped start the discussion of the game. You really can't argue the opposite.saying that my third post didn't succeed in getting discussion going is silly as it's been discussed a lot this game | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 01:36 GMT
#1328
On April 14 2015 10:33 rsoultin wrote: Still wrong. The intention is to get discussion going. What is really important is the motivation.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 10:26 prplhz wrote: saying that my third post didn't succeed in getting discussion going is silly as it's been discussed a lot this game i fail to see how this post is relevant xP the question was intention, not end result -flicks- trfel made a post as scum that "got discussion going" but that didn't make him town lol >< | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 01:38 GMT
#1330
On April 14 2015 10:36 Half the Sky wrote: Promoting useless discussion is indeed scum favored. However, at the very start of the game, what do you expect? No offense, Half the Sky, but the discussion that resulted from prplhz's opening was more useful to solving the game than what you were doing at the same time.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 10:33 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 10:26 prplhz wrote: saying that my third post didn't succeed in getting discussion going is silly as it's been discussed a lot this game i fail to see how this post is relevant xP the question was intention, not end result -flicks- trfel made a post as scum that "got discussion going" but that didn't make him town lol >< I think Soren made a similar argument earlier about useful and useless discussion actually and saying that driving the latter was scumlike behaviour. I also find it ironic, since Soren333 himself was one of the main people to respond to prplhz's opening, and he apparently called it useless discussion? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 01:40 GMT
#1332
On April 14 2015 10:38 rsoultin wrote: Sorry, I haven't actively played mafia in a while (for me, at least). I like talking, and this game has fun people in it. But please, don't skin me, that sounds rather painful. Just slit my throat or something.truffle i am going to skin you for making semantics arguments that serve no purpose ^^ don't you have a thread to be reading? I'll try to go hide and read the thread, haha. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 01:55 GMT
#1337
On April 14 2015 10:53 Half the Sky wrote: Good night.Damn, it is 3am here. I'll carry on as I can later today. Good night. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 02:09 GMT
#1339
On April 12 2015 03:05 Half the Sky wrote: Half marathon!??!?! Wow. Now I feel great about my physical health.Still icing myself (ran a half marathon this morning \o/), but I'm back home. Another 30-45 and I'll be catching up. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 02:43 GMT
#1343
On April 14 2015 11:41 Stutters695 wrote: It's much, much better to roleblock the night kill target than to withhold the roleblock. There's simply no reason for it. The target is confirmed town if they get medic saved anyway.Or they withheld the rb? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 03:11 GMT
#1346
+ Show Spoiler + On April 11 2015 03:38 Half the Sky wrote: Hm... This seems weird to me, given how quickly Half the Sky turned on Onegu. Does she really think that her case on a player who she so emphatically said she couldn't read is strong enough to convince her to lynch me before getting a good chance to read me (who I presume she can read)? This seems a bit suspect to me.Show nested quote + On April 11 2015 03:32 rsoultin wrote: On April 11 2015 03:30 Half the Sky wrote: Ras hence my explanation. Don't think I said I had a strong TR on him at all. I need minimum 2 days to figure him out. so it's not a real townread it's just a you're not sure so don't lynch read? i can buy that i think Yes exactly. However, Half the Sky's posts on page 33 seem a bit better. The normal way to read Half the Sky is to see if she's being interesting or not; interesting Half the Sky is town, while boring Half the Sky is scum. However, in a newbie game, it's much easier to be interesting (the thread moves more slowly, so you can easily beat people to reads and be more original). And while Half the Sky has been interesting at times, her play has felt boring at times as well. Reading this thread all at once, I think that time zones could play a big part in this, and it's possible that I'm just scumreading Half the Sky partially for not posting while she was asleep... I need to take a look at her filter once I catch up with the thread. On April 11 2015 14:54 rsoultin wrote: There is no scum motivation to do this either? At least, not moreso than "in case I drop off the face of the earth, I have a vote, so I'm not modkilled!" Which is (obviously) a pretty stupid reason.Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 07:30 plotspot wrote: Since the rules states I have to vote, and I can't decide, I vote alphabetically. It's still plenty time lift for interaction, I might change my vote anytime, hence I asked whether we can change our vote. I don't see it written on the first page about changing votes. So better vote before I forget to.^^ Btw, I didn't read any mafia threads yet, just the general guide. okay plotspot earns my lynch with fire category lol >< that's just such an asinine reason. he voted because he felt he had to vote someone w/in the first hour of the day and so he wouldn't forget? On April 11 2015 15:37 Breshke wrote: And Breshke mentions this right after. Even more town points to Breshke.How does that make him scum though. What dies scum get from voting in that s ituation. I agree its weird but i dont get how that makes you vote for him. Youre different this game Rso and i dont know if its because with like 0 of the super confident vets around it lets you play differently or if its because you are scum. I get that youre in different coditions but like even your hts read i disagree with im fairly sure she is town and its weird for me because normally i agree with almost everything you say On April 11 2015 16:18 rsoultin wrote: I see now why people are suspicious of prplhz. His filter is almost worth diving for this post alone. Hrmph. Down to a town lean for him, I guess.Show nested quote + On April 11 2015 08:07 prplhz wrote: lzphrpz unordered lynch list: hts jjb bourneq i know you said youd sheep me but hes not one of your 3? Wow, that post from Tubesock about TheBloodyDwarf. I think it's a far, far simpler explanation to say that TheBloodyDwarf simply is new and doesn't know how to play mafia at TL yet. I think that's far too complex of a plan, and not worth taking risks like editing posts (which if this special godfather fake-claim vet plan is true, he would know not to edit posts). The godfather shouldn't play to get cop checked, that's just not a good play at all (especially seeing as only half of the setups have a cop). So I don't think this push really says anything about TheBloodyDwarf (though it does suggest that Tubesock is town). This simply isn't something that mafia would create and try to push. But really, Soren333 believed this in entirety? That kind of blew my mind. On April 11 2015 19:16 prplhz wrote: Despite the initial reason for voting for plotspot being sheeping rsoultin, prplhz takes responsibility for the lynch and pushes it on his own. So, I'm mostly willing to overlook his terrible vote (somewhat pending on how he explains his read on plotspot, though he doesn't really have to, it's obvious that plotspot's play isn't terribly towny).i'm not sure right now, the plotspot lynch is growing on me. Bourneq's transition to vote for plotspot seems strange on the surface. He's a late addition to the wagon. I don't know how his earlier stance on plotspot looked, and I'm not going to be seriously diving filters until I catch up with the entire thread, but this could be suspicious. For now, though, it's not that important. I kind of like Bourneq's case on prplhz, though. I still think that prplhz is solid town, but Bourneq is providing some good analysis. He's missing a lot of good reasons to townread prplhz, so it's only a half story, but from a new player, he seems to be putting in effort. And again, I'm not convinced that prplhz is someone who mafia would want to jump on in this game, given his activity level. On April 11 2015 23:37 rsoultin wrote: This post seems suspicious to me (and no, not for being out until End of Day). It's not terribly relevant, though.meh lol plot and wallpost of null beautiful bourne i still cant follow, why plot now >< tch, sorry guys im out for the day plot/soren should be the lynch...if not follow bresh...hes smart and prob town this game ill be back later this evening Wow, plotspot actually claimed scum? Ugh, what a horrid play. He wasn't at all dead. I'm really surprised at prplhz suddenly deciding that he didn't want to lynch plotspot. That's really strange. And he seems adamant about not lynching plotspot, but isn't willing to lead the charge to someone else, he insists on following someone. On April 12 2015 05:03 prplhz wrote: I can see this coming from a town perspective, but it's really weird.okay tube who do we lynch then? As far as end of day switches go, what the heck happened? This is very surprising to see. On April 12 2015 05:35 Half the Sky wrote: Half the Sky suddenly seems willing to lynch Stutters695. Half the Sky seemed extremely laid back and settled with a plotspot lynch, and now suddenly, she is uneasy? This doesn't make much sense at all. She later clarifies this to be that she's definitely willing to lynch plotspot. So why this sudden reaction to reading Stutters695's filter? This feels out of place. I just don't know why Half the Sky waited until less than 30 minutes to End of Day to come up with this?Oh shit....just read Stutters' filter now, and I see where both Dwarf and prplhz are coming from. His posts aren't exactly driving discussion. Also I looked at the timestamps of when Stutters said he'll look into plotspot and when he voted him. 15 hours and change. So my previous possibility of "being in the middle of analysis" is off the table. As a positive point for prplhz, upon seeing this, he immediately switched his vote. At least he's willing to back up his words with actions, when he sees a little support. TheBloodyDwarf's vote looks really bad here. No explanation at all. On April 12 2015 05:58 Half the Sky wrote: What? This makes no sense at all. Let's assume that scum would not bus here. You could be dealing with Stutters695 voting for plotspot, or Stutters695 voting for plotsplot. This is no reason whatsoever to change votes.Stutters voted plotspot. Would someone bus someone this early in a newbie game? He's a veteran, but probably not. ##unvote ##vote stutters695 However, I don't think this makes Half the Sky scum. The mafia motivation, while there, isn't worth such an unexplained vote switch. And she moved her vote off of a town who claimed scum, who no one would have blamed her for mislynching. Town Breshke jarjarbinks Tubesock Town Lean rsoultin prplhz Null Half the Sky Bourneq Scum Lean Stutters695 TheBloodyDwarf Only 22 pages to go. And then filter diving. I'm sorry, I'm sort of losing my focus, I've been playing mafia for most of the day, it's really hard for me to catch up. Hopefully tomorrow I will be able to finish reading the thread. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 03:53 GMT
#1364
He's being forceful, active, and his reads have generally been good. I don't normally see all three of these traits at once from a town prplhz, so I doubt even more that he would play like this as mafia. I can demonstrate this if necessary, but at this time I don't think that it is necessary. And prplhz can speak for himself. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:06 GMT
#1367
On April 14 2015 12:57 Tubesock wrote: Prplhz has been an active participant in the town throughout Day 1. He started out by voting Bourneq and townreading Soren333. Also, prplhz was one of the main people trying to get off of the plotspot wagon, which certainly wasn't a mainstream idea when he started suggesting it. I realize that the way he did so can be considered sheeping, and isn't being particularly independent, but if you look at how he does it, he is consistent between his play and his words.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 12:53 Trfel wrote: I'm pretty confident that prplhz is town here. I've read Stutters695's arguments (or at least, the posts that I believe he is referring to) and I don't find them to be all that convincing. He's being forceful, active, and his reads have generally been good. I don't normally see all three of these traits at once from a town prplhz, so I doubt even more that he would play like this as mafia. I can demonstrate this if necessary, but at this time I don't think that it is necessary. And prplhz can speak for himself. I can see those three things being true enough. What exactly is he being forceful about aside from protecting Dwarf though? I don't think you can say he was that forceful on Plotspot since it didn't take much of any force for people to attack him. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:08 GMT
#1369
On April 14 2015 13:03 Breshke wrote: I suppose you're right. Not that it changes much, but this is a good assessment.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 12:32 rsoultin wrote: wait now i think i'm confused again -_- you were trying to say that the lack of an rb claim is indicative of a vet and if there's a vet there isn't a vet/doc setup in the op, right? CORRECT so im saying we most likely don't have a doc | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:10 GMT
#1370
At the same time, I almost wonder if he could have an easier time jumping into the thread if he is scum? Scum replacements don't really have to read the thread, they can sort of make stuff up and hope to get by. Especially in a newbie game. Obviously that isn't a very effective way to play, but many people claim to play scum without reading the thread. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:18 GMT
#1375
On April 14 2015 13:15 rsoultin wrote: To be honest, I can definitely see myself lynching him today. It's just not something I really care to discuss at this time.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 13:10 Trfel wrote: I agree that The Shining/Ace1312's slot doesn't look very good, but that's mostly for activity. I'm ignoring it for now. At the same time, I almost wonder if he could have an easier time jumping into the thread if he is scum? Scum replacements don't really have to read the thread, they can sort of make stuff up and hope to get by. Especially in a newbie game. Obviously that isn't a very effective way to play, but many people claim to play scum without reading the thread. lol >< true i know i don't cause i'd get caught in a new york minute but lol he replaced in before EoD though so i mean, at some point that excuse stops being valid i brought it up less because of the afk bit and more because while bourne is being discussed, shining isn't, which i find odd. plus lol you can't really argue that his post today was...i mean, what's even the point of posting? Oh well, here goes, I'll try to read the rest of the thread before bedtime. Haha. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:23 GMT
#1379
On April 14 2015 13:17 Tubesock wrote: I mean, everyone makes errors. And no one can remember every detail, most players forget most of the details. My point is that, you know who scum is, and you have scum teammates in the scum QT who can help you. They can tell you the thread sentiment, who the main town players are, who they are currently pushing, etc. Like, I imagine that they could basically tell you where your reads should be at the start of the game with basic reasons for each one, and then that could be posted without having carefully read the thread at all. Clearly he can't admit to not have read the thread (or tried to) here, but I do think he could fake it (this doesn't work if someone analyzes him really well, but good analysis is hard to do).Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 13:10 Trfel wrote: I agree that The Shining/Ace1312's slot doesn't look very good, but that's mostly for activity. I'm ignoring it for now. At the same time, I almost wonder if he could have an easier time jumping into the thread if he is scum? Scum replacements don't really have to read the thread, they can sort of make stuff up and hope to get by. Especially in a newbie game. Obviously that isn't a very effective way to play, but many people claim to play scum without reading the thread. I don't think I agree with this at all. People are asking you stuff since you're here. If he showed up people will be asking him stuff too. In my 2nd game a newbie (I don't remember the name of it, but you were nightkilled N1 trfel in it) There was a replacement scum Scott1313371234123541235 for Gumdrops. Gum made 2 posts and was replaced. Scott's entrance was a thread sentiment list post with nice little links to the post for each player that expressed his read. He HAD to show us he read the thread and was eventually caught up. He would have died right then. Same with you, you HAVE to show you've read town or mafia. Like, you get leeway but not a pardon. A town replacement is under pressure to produce content just as much as a scum replacement is. The Shining's inactivity is definitely scummy, but I would still expect the scum team to give him some kind of ground to stand on (unless they're giving him up for dead, or they aren't very competent, or my analysis of how scum teams should work is completely wrong). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:32 GMT
#1387
On April 14 2015 13:30 jarjarbinks wrote: I believe it is 5:00 PM EDT.I'll try to check back in at lunchtime to make my vote relevant if it isn't Sorry again... bad EOD time for me unfortunately...i think? Its 430pm ET right? i'll be on for a few secs while im brushing my teeth if you are confused/concerned. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:47 GMT
#1396
On April 14 2015 13:43 Tubesock wrote: Yeah, sorry, the night kill doesn't really suggest this at all. Remember, this is a newbie game.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 13:33 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 13:26 Tubesock wrote: On April 14 2015 13:21 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 13:17 Tubesock wrote: On April 14 2015 13:10 Trfel wrote: I agree that The Shining/Ace1312's slot doesn't look very good, but that's mostly for activity. I'm ignoring it for now. At the same time, I almost wonder if he could have an easier time jumping into the thread if he is scum? Scum replacements don't really have to read the thread, they can sort of make stuff up and hope to get by. Especially in a newbie game. Obviously that isn't a very effective way to play, but many people claim to play scum without reading the thread. I don't think I agree with this at all. People are asking you stuff since you're here. If he showed up people will be asking him stuff too. In my 2nd game a newbie (I don't remember the name of it, but you were nightkilled N1 trfel in it) There was a replacement scum Scott1313371234123541235 for Gumdrops. Gum made 2 posts and was replaced. Scott's entrance was a thread sentiment list post with nice little links to the post for each player that expressed his read. He HAD to show us he read the thread and was eventually caught up. He would have died right then. Same with you, you HAVE to show you've read town or mafia. Like, you get leeway but not a pardon. xP that doesn't tell me what you think about shining lol and whether you agree or not, some players don't read the thread as scum, or at least claim they don't. whether it's good play or not doesn't really matter? unless this argument has any bearing on shining's alignment i don't see why we're discussing it again -_- ha forgot that part. I liked the little content he had, but yeah why hasn't he produced like he said he would? How long do we give these lurker players to be town? Why does it feel like town is just eating town right now? If we are going to lynch a lurker type player, I want to kill Dwarf. ?? I just have weird bad feelings. I just think with like 5 lurkers about how angry I'm going to be if we have 3 lurker mafias who thought Soren was the towniest player so NK his slot but HF enters and the rest of us are like "holy shit obviously a vet is on the mafia team!" I missed it, you voting Shining? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 04:56 GMT
#1401
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 05:00 GMT
#1403
His late vote without explanation pushed him from null to scum lean. My current lynch pool is as follows (no particular order): TheBloodyDwarf, Stutters695, The Shining, and Bourneq | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 05:04 GMT
#1405
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 05:11 GMT
#1410
On April 14 2015 14:06 rsoultin wrote: Not necessarily. I'm not calling out a scum team, I'm calling my lynch pool. It's a distinct possibility that at least one of the mafia is very active, just at this moment I don't want to lynch an active player. Maybe that will change by EOD, maybe not, it depends on information. I have a poor record as of late with calling out multiple scum at once and guessing the scum thread presence, so I'm not going to try if I can help it (I probably will soon enough anyway).Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 14:00 Trfel wrote: So far, I'm not impressed with TheBloodyDwarf at all. His play is clearly not towny, there is no question of that. I guess I could see him being a stubborn SC2 Mafia player who is new to a forum mafia environment. But then, he clearly stated, in bold, that this isn't SC2 mafia. From there, I expected to see him attempting to play the forum mafia style (not necessarily succeeding, just attempting). And I haven't seen that at all yet. His late vote without explanation pushed him from null to scum lean. My current lynch pool is as follows (no particular order): TheBloodyDwarf, Stutters695, The Shining, and Bourneq meh lurkers with a side of short filter lol >< seems too easy. but then...i dunnae the lurkers always seem to get me. i did it with oats in the Game that Shall not be Named...and i did it in my first game here so i assume this means you agree with tube that the scumteam doesn't seem to have a presence in the thread right now? On April 14 2015 14:07 rsoultin wrote: I refer to his first series of posts, in which he gives reads on every player.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 14:04 Trfel wrote: Hm, I don't like The Shining's entrance at all. Which is weird, because everyone else seemed to. are you referring to his literal entrance post? because i was referring to the reads/analysis he started making once he'd actually read part of the thread lol >< | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 05:16 GMT
#1412
On April 14 2015 14:13 rsoultin wrote: He made reads that left me extremely unimpressed. As in, he didn't actually say anything, it feels like his motivation is more to avoid being lynched than to find scum. I could overlook it if he followed up, but he doesn't appear to have done so... (not counting asking me if I claimed scum)Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 14:11 Trfel wrote: On April 14 2015 14:06 rsoultin wrote: Not necessarily. I'm not calling out a scum team, I'm calling my lynch pool. It's a distinct possibility that at least one of the mafia is very active, just at this moment I don't want to lynch an active player. Maybe that will change by EOD, maybe not, it depends on information. I have a poor record as of late with calling out multiple scum at once and guessing the scum thread presence, so I'm not going to try if I can help it (I probably will soon enough anyway).On April 14 2015 14:00 Trfel wrote: So far, I'm not impressed with TheBloodyDwarf at all. His play is clearly not towny, there is no question of that. I guess I could see him being a stubborn SC2 Mafia player who is new to a forum mafia environment. But then, he clearly stated, in bold, that this isn't SC2 mafia. From there, I expected to see him attempting to play the forum mafia style (not necessarily succeeding, just attempting). And I haven't seen that at all yet. His late vote without explanation pushed him from null to scum lean. My current lynch pool is as follows (no particular order): TheBloodyDwarf, Stutters695, The Shining, and Bourneq meh lurkers with a side of short filter lol >< seems too easy. but then...i dunnae the lurkers always seem to get me. i did it with oats in the Game that Shall not be Named...and i did it in my first game here so i assume this means you agree with tube that the scumteam doesn't seem to have a presence in the thread right now? On April 14 2015 14:07 rsoultin wrote: I refer to his first series of posts, in which he gives reads on every player.On April 14 2015 14:04 Trfel wrote: Hm, I don't like The Shining's entrance at all. Which is weird, because everyone else seemed to. are you referring to his literal entrance post? because i was referring to the reads/analysis he started making once he'd actually read part of the thread lol >< mmmm i should probably take another look at that o.0 i didn't realize he read all of the players? i was mostly just fine with him making reads at all since he'd just replaced in >< lol in the morning, though...getting kinda tired :/ | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 05:23 GMT
#1418
On April 14 2015 14:20 Breshke wrote: Also Stutters695. I said it at the top of the page.Trefel when you say you don't want to lynch an active player today who does that leave you with left in your lynch pool? dwarf, bourne and theshining? anyone else? Note that the reason that I don't want to lynch active players isn't (primarily) activity. I just see these four as significantly more scummy at this time. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 05:38 GMT
#1424
On April 14 2015 14:37 Stutters695 wrote: Try me. I dare you.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 14:00 Trfel wrote: So far, I'm not impressed with TheBloodyDwarf at all. His play is clearly not towny, there is no question of that. I guess I could see him being a stubborn SC2 Mafia player who is new to a forum mafia environment. But then, he clearly stated, in bold, that this isn't SC2 mafia. From there, I expected to see him attempting to play the forum mafia style (not necessarily succeeding, just attempting). And I haven't seen that at all yet. His late vote without explanation pushed him from null to scum lean. My current lynch pool is as follows (no particular order): TheBloodyDwarf, Stutters695, The Shining, and Bourneq Is this guy scum? I really want to lynch him. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 06:24 GMT
#1432
+ Show Spoiler + On April 12 2015 15:47 The Shining wrote: So, The Shining read 16 pages (320 posts) in 30 minutes? That's a post every six seconds. He's not reading very carefully at all.Sort of. Top of page 23. At this pace, I should be caught up before EoN though, provided I don't fall asleep lol. Nice to see you again, JJB. I came in dead set on nailing you in particular if I read you as scum at all(See: our last game together). I'm really hoping your alignment is diff this time around lol. On April 12 2015 16:29 The Shining wrote: And this post isn't very good. His first point, about Ace1312 as a fallback policy lynch, is fair. But that isn't enough to lynch someone for. He scumreads Stutters695 for being suspicious about several of his (The Shining's) townreads, but he doesn't explain why he has these reads. And he doesn't show why the disagreement in reads is alignment indicative.Show nested quote + On April 11 2015 10:48 Stutters695 wrote: On April 11 2015 08:39 jarjarbinks wrote: Hmm The flip flop begins lol So I previously wasn't a huge fan of Stutters so far. I'm changing my mind. Sure, Onegu voted Breshke before. There wasn't too much traction on him before that IMO. He made a case and it looked like he thought it was pretty good. It seems like he has been scumhunting around since then. I expect him to show his "top four" and his reads besides Breshke. But he did just get in the game. I don't see him as lynchable right now at all. Was wondering how long it would take someone to notice that. Was really hoping it'd be a newbie to see their reaction, but can't win them all. Ace: obv policy lynch, nothing more. I'm less confident in seeing an increase in posting from him if we give him time, do he's my fall back if I can't get my main lynch going. Currently I still want Breshke's head. I'm not sure how to vocalize it exactly, but he just feels off. I still see plenty of scum mindset behind his actions and skimming his past 4 (2 scum, 2 town) games day 1 hasn't put me at ease. His play so far doesn't match either meta really. As town he has much more focus in his posts. He might change his mind, but if he saw something he didn't like (my post for example) he would challenge it until he's satisfied, not brush it off. There is also a distinct lack of interaction with the people he suspects. His scum meta does seem to withhold reads until later, but after dying n1 and n2, I can see why he would attempt to change that. He's currently who I want to lynch. The other two I'm really interested in are prpl and plot, but I haven't had the time to really get into them yet. Can you rephrase that question about interactions with Onegu? If you mean us playing together, we have, but nothing notable from memory. This post stands out to me regarding Stutters. From what I've read so far and the filters I've dove, I've got a few preliminary reads that I'd be more than willing to explain after this. The way he mentions Ace as a "fallback" lynch just doesn't feel right. It's more of a tone read and I'm aware Ace hadn't done much before being replaced but writing off a newbie because you don't feel he'll increase in posting on D1 doesn't feel right. And I have Breshke as a town lean so naturally, it raises questions that he'd want to lynch him. He also mentions being suspicious of plot(flipped VT) and prpl. So that's 2 town and a town lean he'd be willing to lynch, before ultimately(and effortlessly) sheeping onto plot over his poor EoD antics. I've yet to read prpl and there's a lot more than that for me to read as well, but I'll continue trying to catch up and answer as best I can. On April 12 2015 16:37 The Shining wrote: And the fact that he had to go back and clarify this doesn't help him. He's provided some thoughts, but nothing special, nothing unique, nothing influential, nothing that stands out, nothing memorable. All he's done is share some thoughts. He doesn't seem to be pushing anything, just providing reads for the purpose of not dying.EBWOP: If I wasnt clear enough, I'm leaning scum on Stutters. On April 13 2015 08:48 rsoultin wrote: Again, this simply isn't true. Holyflare would be the nightkill here even with a scum team of three newbies who have never played with him before....yeah, at least someone on the scum team must know hf. problem is, at least half the players here do i think so i'm not sure how that helps Rsoultin's comments on Half the Sky simply aren't alignment indicative. The scum motivation for that vote switch isn't there, and definitely doesn't outweigh the burden of trying to explain it. Half the Sky can go back to a slight town lean. I like the confidence that prplhz has with regards to not being scumread. Given his level of play, it seems reasonable for him to expect to not be scumread. I'm not sure if he would act like this as town. This is very good. However, I don't see why scum would be so willing to switch off of a town who claimed scum. He would never get lynched for mislynching plotspot here. This point makes a lot of sense if Tubesock is scum with Stutters695, but I don't want to make unflipped association reads. The most likely conclusion is that Tubesock re-evaluated without sharing with the thread, though this certainly makes him look worse. Rsoultin pointed out some missing posts, though. Still leaning town on Tubesock, definitely, just not as much as before. Ugh, I'm super sleepy. I skimmed up to the point where I replaced in. Sorry this isn't particularly detailed. Good night. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 06:24 GMT
#1433
On April 14 2015 15:22 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: If you explained it, I missed it. I'll take a look tomorrow.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 14:00 Trfel wrote: His late vote without explanation pushed him from null to scum lean. But I did? ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 15:53 GMT
#1459
On April 14 2015 23:58 Half the Sky wrote: Again, I never said this at all...My issue personally with Trfel's post is that D2 is a bit too premature to conclude the entire scumteam is inactive. Now I don't think he's PoEed everyone else yet, from what I recall, I believe it's a result of whoever he's rated the lowest in his latest page of analysis. It is possible and it has certainly happened, but given the nature of scumteams on TL on average, it is unlikely. It IS likely there's one lurker, possibly two on a three-person scumteam, but all three being inactive would be extremely rare. I have said that all of the people that I am currently thinking of lynching are less active. I'm not good enough to call out the scum team at this point in the game, you know that. I go lynch by lynch. Anyway, it seems that people don't really want to lynch Stutters695 today, so I suppose I will accept that. The Shining looks like a fair target, but I'll take another look at Bourneq and TheBloodyDwarf. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 16:15 GMT
#1463
On April 15 2015 00:42 Half the Sky wrote: It's relative....Rasputin, so you can understand me a bit better, this is the quote I take issue with: Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 12:53 Trfel wrote: I'm pretty confident that prplhz is town here. I've read Stutters695's arguments (or at least, the posts that I believe he is referring to) and I don't find them to be all that convincing. He's being forceful, active, and his reads have generally been good. I don't normally see all three of these traits at once from a town prplhz, so I doubt even more that he would play like this as mafia. I can demonstrate this if necessary, but at this time I don't think that it is necessary. And prplhz can speak for himself. I'm doublechecking 1) how forceful he was and 2) the bases for his reads. When you three voted me D2, you I know believed your case against me, like your tone felt genuine, but I recall prplhz being like "I can roll with that" or something similar when he followed with his vote, so I'm backtracking to see how he progressed on other people. The other thing that doesn't add up for me is that he was hard defending Dwarf but openly telling him to be more useful. I'm sure I recall that somewhere. That just felt strange to me. Someone like Holyflare is probably the most aggressive. He'll see one post and hard push that player with apparent 100% confidence. Prplhz isn't a player like that. From reading the thread, the impression that I got was that prplhz was leading and driving things along for most of Day 1. His exact tone and wording isn't always very forceful, but when you look at the ideas that he presents, you can see it. For example, here is the way he treated the vote switch to Stutters695 on Day 1. Most people consider this progression suspicious. On April 12 2015 04:37 prplhz wrote: Here is the first post he makes. I believe that he is the first player to suggest leaving the plotspot lynch (I'm not going to go back tons of pages to double check, but he is at least one of the first). At this point, the vote count was very heavily in favor of lynching plotspot (7 on plotspot, 0 on Stutters695). I know that the way he phrases it is a request, but this also makes some sense, since without the support of others he can't actually change the lynch. At this time, Half the Sky is the only person in the thread, and she refuses to switch, so prplhz drops it. okay i tentatively don't want to lynch plotspot anyway lol can we lynch soren or stutters? Prplhz also posts his explanation for why he would prefer to lynch Stutters695 over plotspot, and the way he arrived at this read feels towny enough (though that's an issue for another day). At this point, I would be suspicious of prplhz. Asking one person to switch and then not doing anything when they don't switch isn't very impressive (still something town does all the time, but isn't a very good play). But then Tubesock comes back, and says that he doesn't want to lynch plotspot. Prplhz immediately jumps and asks him who he wants to lynch. On April 12 2015 05:03 prplhz wrote: Prplhz seems to be more interested in not lynching plotspot than lynching a specific player, and that's fine. Still, despite asking who Tubesock wanted to lynch (Tubesock initially said TheBloodyDwarf), prplhz still argues for a Stutters695 lynch. Then Tubesock shows desire to talk about plotspot and Stutters695, as well as a lack of confidence in lynching plotspot, so it can be assumed that he is willing to lynch Stutters695. And Half the Sky rereads Stutters695's filter, and said that she understands why he is scummy (implying willingness to lynch him). Prplhz immediately switches his vote, the first one to do so.okay tube who do we lynch then? Prplhz isn't posting huge walls of text or screaming with all caps, but he clearly made a decision and put effort into getting people's attention and making them listen to him. In some of his posts, his tone felt very wishy-washy, however if you look at the consistency of his play, and the context for when he said what he said, he's actually very solid in his decision. Despite the way he asked players to switch votes and seemed willing to follow them wherever, that isn't what he did, and it's obvious that prplhz was leading the thread through this period. Were plotspot scum, I could see an argument being made for prplhz being scum because of these actions. However, with a flipped plotspot, these actions aren't inherently scummy, and I feel that they are consistent with the rest of prplhz's play in this game. This is one example, but I feel that prplhz played a leading role throughout Day 1. I'm used to prplhz playing a more reserved role; while he always participates in the thread, this is the first time I have seen him consistently leading. And that's why he is a confident townread. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 16:24 GMT
#1464
If you are concerned about my scumreads not having a balance of lurkers and non-lurkers, I'm sorry. I could falsify my scumreads to make them "perfect" in every way, but that isn't good for town at all. I realize that I most likely missed at least one mafia. I'm just saying that at this point in the day, I'm not going to have the time to try and catch them today, and so I'll go with the people I initially judge as scummy and make the best lynch from them. I am highly confident that at least one member of my lynch pool is mafia. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 16:33 GMT
#1466
On April 10 2015 16:15 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I feel that this is a key post from TheBloodyDwarf. After a long series of rules misunderstandings and not really adjusting to the game properly, TheBloodyDwarf states (in bold) that this is a different game than SC2 arcade mafia. Because of this post, I am willing to forgive him his previous errors. And from this point out, I expect to see him attempting to play the game in the forum mafia style, instead of the SC2 arcade mafia style. But I don't see him following through with this.Looks like I have to bit explain myself. After reading this I think my posts make more sense. This is not sc2 arcade mafia. I thought day 1 is just day for chat. Nothing happens before somebody brings evidency to table. Also I didnt know its insta lynch who gets most votes. So pretty much my day1 posts mean nothing. I felt like everybody is chatting (felt for me) and then suddenly Soren333 starts replying to those chatty posts. I thought it looked really funny and he even asked questions that I answered later but before he asked again. Also I didnt know that scum means mafia. I realized scum means mafia way way later. "Everybody has little scum inside them" Isn't that just like some IRC chat? like talking to friends? Nobody trying to be serious kind of answer. Why I voted somebody? Looks like you have to vote everyday or you get kicked out of the game. (again this is not sc2 mafia..). I just voted fearing maybe I forget or don't have time to vote and admins kick me out. Why fear of death some ask? Well, I want to play this game and not to die? "I hope our cop or vigi is good". Again, I was expecting cop to give some "evidence" to table and then people discuss is that person trustful and can his claims even be possible. But that's all wrong. Looks like you make your presumption based on chat. With feels quite weird to me now but I am noob playing this mafia for the first time and some here are experts. So I have to see how this works out. So I think I have time to rethink who to vote so, ##UNVOTE On April 10 2015 16:20 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: This is one read that he provides, he says that he liked prplhz the least by the time he voted for him.^^^And I voted for guy who I least liked so far^^^ On April 11 2015 20:12 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Back to the point. Call my blind but I just don't see anything really suspicious. I was going to vote for Ace but now he is gone. Soren is bit weird tho. He comes to thread with fireguns bangging and then goes silent for moment. But nothing special. Also Stutters is really quiet. On April 11 2015 23:45 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: TheBloodyDwarf also provides these two posts before End of Day, which actually provide sufficient explanation for his late vote on Stutters695.Show nested quote + On April 11 2015 22:32 rsoultin wrote: O.o Tube moving up lol but dude i think you may be high on something xP not a huge fan of narratives anyway. yours at least had me laughing? dwarf could you please give reads? even if you like arent sure on any of them? prp read is in part knowing him but mostly the nature of his posts. hes aggressive, has made some sharp comments/observations, and his reads adapt to what is going on in the thread rather than remaining static lol you...returning to prp scumread after its poinyed out that you seemed to drop it, plus some of those posts that are pure commentary...id be happy to lynch you today >< what do you think about that? I dont find anybody really suspicious.. ![]() Stutters695. Checking his filter and I mostly see questions. Looks like he doesn't really have own opinion but is asking others what do they think. btw, I dont like you Tubesock, you have been chasing me from the beginning ![]() There's really no reason to go either way on him. Since the post I first mentioned, his play has changed. I can see him as a new player who simply is having trouble finding suspicious things. However, outside of a possible toneread, I see no reason to townread him either, as he hasn't done anything amazing. I can easily see TheBloodyDwarf being either alignment, so I don't really want to lynch him today. The most suspicious thing about him is really his inactivity, he hasn't shared any reads at all since Day 1. But that isn't really alignment indicative. He might need to be policy lynched eventually, but I see more reason to lynch The Shining, at least (if not others as well). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 16:53 GMT
#1468
##vote The Shining I demonstrated previously why I don't like The Shining's posting to this point. It's possible that he is just busy, but I feel that he has a fairly good chance of flipping scum. I'll take another look at his, Ace1312's, and Bourneq's filters in a bit, hopefully. Right now, I need to head out for lunch. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 17:55 GMT
#1486
What I did do is I took (arguably) the most suspicious part of prplhz's filter, and I showed why I view it as towny. I don't see at all why prplhz would decide to switch to Stutters695 to mislynch him instead of plotspot. I mean, I suppose it's possible, but I don't think that this is something that mafia would want to do, as the gain feels minimal, while the amount of work required is much more. Getting the lynch off of plotspot wasn't very likely anyway. I just don't think that the mafia motivation to do this is significant. On April 15 2015 02:14 Half the Sky wrote: I just don't see it. Prplhz gave reasons. At this point, he was sort of acting on feel as well (everyone was). Yes, he could have feasibly chosen anyone in Tubesock's list to switch votes to, but he provided his reasons for doing so, so it doesn't matter? Given the chances he had of getting the Stutters695 lynch, there's next to zero mafia motivation at all for the play that he made.Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 12:45 Tubesock wrote: Well, I can still lynch Dwarf. I'm thinking about Prplhz. I don't understand why he's so hard defending him. Well, I mean I see his reasons. But why were Plot and Bourneq any different? Or Stutters prior to his Prp case? My tinfoil is saying that he set up the shenany to set up a mlynch the next day. It's pretty easy to see that EoD weirdness will get a lot of talk. We've done nothing but scum random people all for the same reasons. Directed at Trfel - this is the quote to support what he was working through. I don't think that Stutters695 presented a valid case at all. I think that his case is a misrepresentation of prplhz's play, and I arrive at the exact opposite conclusion. As for prplhz's stances on TheBloodyDwarf and Bourneq, I don't think it's terribly significant at this time. He sees two new players, objectively inexperienced. One of them, he sees where their play is coming from, and he townreads them, while the other he scumreads. This is plausible enough. Also, were I scum with TheBloodyDwarf, I would just bus him. He's not really worth defending, unless he's the roleblocker, and maybe even then. TheBloodyDwarf stands a good chance of being lynched at some point in the game, and if he does flip scum, prplhz will look very bad for his defense. Yes, it's possible that his push on Stutters695 was done as scum. Yes, it's possible that prplhz is scum with TheBloodyDwarf and is thus defending him while trying to get Bourneq lynched. But neither of those reasons really implicate him. And concluding that prplhz is scum because of this ignores the rest of his filter, in which he has been extremely active and has been trying to solve the game. I don't see why it should be assumed that these actions are scummy, when they could just as easily (if not moreso) come from town, given prplhz's overall filter level. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 18:01 GMT
#1487
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 18:06 GMT
#1489
I just don't have much time today at all. I spend yesterday catching up on the thread, which took basically the whole day. And today, I only have an hour and a half to actually prepare for the lynch. I was townreading Breshke earlier, but maybe people are on to something, as it seems that a lot of people want to lynch him. I'll spend maybe ten minutes looking at him now, but perhaps that is something for people to look in to. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 18:22 GMT
#1491
See you guys (hopefully) before the deadline. Final note, did anyone else find The Shining's phrasing weird? On April 15 2015 02:35 The Shining wrote: Imagine, if you are town, I don't think this is the natural phrasing. I would say "I am town" or "I am not scum". It's not terribly important, but it seems a little off to me.I have absolutely 0 chance of flipping scum. I'll take a look at what The Shining does between now and the deadline (assuming I get a chance), but he hasn't done anything that makes me want to keep him alive yet. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:23 GMT
#1535
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:25 GMT
#1538
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:27 GMT
#1542
The only thing to the contrary is that perhaps he is capable of more than I expect. He played quite well in XXX mafia (as town), so maybe his scum game is better than I have been led to believe. But even so, his play in this game has seemed rather townie. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:28 GMT
#1545
On April 15 2015 05:26 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I don't think it's that hard for you to avoid being lynched here (assuming you are town). Just stick with it.Im just waiting to see are you guys going to lynch me so I can do my final post and waste my vote. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:29 GMT
#1546
On April 15 2015 05:28 Breshke wrote: It's possible that rsoultin is scum, but that's not something I care to go into at this time. For obvious reasons.RSO could easily be scum here for thinking i was town enough to vote shining straight after i do.basically cheerleadering.me then trying to wagon me with shining when she thinks i.womt rock up. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:32 GMT
#1551
On April 15 2015 05:30 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: If you avoid being lynched today, I'm sure we can help you with this after the deadline. Taking notes could help a lot.I really feel bad tho. People asking me what I think and why I dont post scumhunting. Simple fact is that I don't really find anybody scummy. I only see if people are active or not and are they answering questions. Pretty bad at analyzing posts :/ I hardly remember who is scumhunting who and who they were scumhunting. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:35 GMT
#1557
May not be back until End of Day. Or at least, I'll be distracted. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:42 GMT
#1566
On April 15 2015 05:39 rsoultin wrote: NO YOU NEED TO LYNCH THE SHINING##vote: Breshke i'll consolidate on dwarf or maybe bourne if i have to, but i'm not lynching prp or shining today GIVE ME A BIT I WILL SHOW YOU WHY I CANT REALLY PLAY RIGHT NOW BUT LYNCH THE SHINING | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:45 GMT
#1571
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:50 GMT
#1581
On April 12 2015 15:15 The Shining wrote: Woah. 49 pages D1/N1 on a newbie student game. Woohoo! I get to read the entire game up to this point with no breaks. In all its glory. I'm thinking I'll find our first scum. Wish me luck. Inb4 useless entry post. Never replaced before so idc. On April 12 2015 15:47 The Shining wrote: Again, The Shining is reading 16 pages in about 30 minutes. He hasn't read the game very carefully at all. However, he doesn't seem to suggest that at all, he's trying to appear to be at full capability.Sort of. Top of page 23. At this pace, I should be caught up before EoN though, provided I don't fall asleep lol. Nice to see you again, JJB. I came in dead set on nailing you in particular if I read you as scum at all(See: our last game together). I'm really hoping your alignment is diff this time around lol. He provides a preliminary series of reads. They are as follows:
And then he leaves. He hasn't done anything whatsoever that is hard to do, he's provided almost no reasoning and no original thought. Also note that he hasn't hinted at all about his activity being lacking, he's discussed reading the thread, and hasn't used his replacing as an excuse at all. In fact, he seems optimistic. Then, suddenly, he comes back while there is a threat of him being lynched, less than four hours to the deadline. Suddenly he's blaming activity a ton, suddenly he's trying to do things. This doesn't look good at all. The Shining is scum. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:53 GMT
#1587
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:56 GMT
#1594
On April 15 2015 05:54 rsoultin wrote: And I don't care, because I don't like your reasons for not lynching The Shining?not gonna i explicitly said i'm not fucking lynching prp or shining today He simply isn't doing anything that I find impressive. He's been inconsistent for how much he blames his availability and his replacing into the game, to the level where I feel that he's trying to survive instead of trying to catch scum. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:58 GMT
#1601
On April 15 2015 05:56 The Shining wrote: This isn't something that a townie jumps to at this time, before the flip. Town waits for the flip and then says this (or it's an obvious possibility, if he dies).Breshke Trfel team? Trying to save BD? This is something that a scum does to discredit his wagon. There's no reason to suddenly ignore everything else in the thread and randomly call out a full scum team. The Shining is mafia. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 20:59 GMT
#1604
Not very pleased with you guys. ##unvote ##vote TheBloodyDwarf | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 21:00 GMT
#1608
On April 15 2015 05:59 Breshke wrote: But prplhz is town. So I don't care about wagon quality.sorry trefel i think tbd is more likely town than prp and scummers probaly on tbd wagon Of course scum is on TheBloodyDwarf, it's the easy mislynch. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 21:01 GMT
#1611
Just, someone listen to me. Sometime. The Shining is mafia. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 21:03 GMT
#1615
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 21:05 GMT
#1623
On April 15 2015 06:03 rsoultin wrote: Because Breshke is town, and prplhz is town?tch -_- if i had a bullet >< though lol why does breshke try to hammer scummate prp stutters that i don't follow I'm fairly confident that The Shining is scum here. I expect that scum defended him pretty hard here. I don't want to go too far down that road though, it's unflipped associations. It just frustrates me to lynch a complete shot in the dark over someone being inconsistent and unimpressive, when I know that The Shining is capable of quite a lot. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 21:07 GMT
#1626
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 14 2015 21:20 GMT
#1634
Anyway, I need to step back and take another look at this game. Re-filter everyone, check prplhz's meta, etc. But certainly not right now. Have fun. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 00:06 GMT
#1655
On April 15 2015 06:20 Trfel wrote: The Shining, by when can I expect you to have started playing the game with your full capabilities? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 16:02 GMT
#1724
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 16:03 GMT
#1725
On April 16 2015 01:02 Trfel wrote: Or actually, can I just post them in the scum QT?Wait, so am I supposed to send my night actions to LoneMeow, Fecalfeast, or both? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 16:07 GMT
#1727
On April 16 2015 01:06 prplhz wrote: Can I submit your action for you?you can post roleblocker action in QT, i have to do that myself | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 16:11 GMT
#1730
On April 16 2015 01:09 prplhz wrote: I kind of think we should shoot LoneMeow. Fecalfeast tends to be lazy, so if we shoot LoneMeow, there won't be any vote counts, so it will be extremely easy to mess with town in shenanigan votes.who do you think we should shoot tonight trfel? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 16:20 GMT
#1733
On April 16 2015 01:19 rsoultin wrote: Shush, I need to make my joke work!nah, fecalfeast is baller when he's on the ball lol xP plus vengeance! + Show Spoiler + Fecalfeast is actually a very good host/cohost, haha. Maybe I should shoot him instead of LoneMeow ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 16:21 GMT
#1734
Thanks! | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 16:23 GMT
#1736
On April 16 2015 01:21 rsoultin wrote: + Show Spoiler +Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:20 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 01:19 rsoultin wrote: Shush, I need to make my joke work!nah, fecalfeast is baller when he's on the ball lol xP plus vengeance! + Show Spoiler + Fecalfeast is actually a very good host/cohost, haha. Maybe I should shoot him instead of LoneMeow ![]() + Show Spoiler + have you tested spoilers in the QT yet? he'll never find that we're shooting him there! But if he doesn't see it, then he won't count the shot on himself? We sort of need the host to resolve the shot... | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 17:28 GMT
#1740
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 17:44 GMT
#1741
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 18:02 GMT
#1743
On April 16 2015 02:54 rsoultin wrote: After rereading Breshke's filter, he is my strongest townread.how much? ummm i know shining, stutters and i all think he's scum, but i don't know about anyone else? and i'm not sure on shining either lol >< He hasn't necessarily been the most forceful player here, but he's shown a clear desire to solve the game. He's been sharing important reads, and he's made a lot of very good observations. I just don't see Breshke being scum here. If you would like a meta reason, Breshke suffered from inactivity in the last game I played with him (Guardians of the Galaxy). He still made several key observations, but ended up being mislynched for his periods of inactivity. Given that I feel that his posts in this game have been more insightful than last, I am even less inclined to lynch him. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 18:23 GMT
#1745
On April 16 2015 03:19 rsoultin wrote: Okay, fine, his Day 2 was weaker. But I don't care? He played an extremely solid Day 1. Read through his filter again, there's an explanation for everything he's been doing.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 03:02 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 02:54 rsoultin wrote: After rereading Breshke's filter, he is my strongest townread.how much? ummm i know shining, stutters and i all think he's scum, but i don't know about anyone else? and i'm not sure on shining either lol >< He hasn't necessarily been the most forceful player here, but he's shown a clear desire to solve the game. He's been sharing important reads, and he's made a lot of very good observations. I just don't see Breshke being scum here. If you would like a meta reason, Breshke suffered from inactivity in the last game I played with him (Guardians of the Galaxy). He still made several key observations, but ended up being mislynched for his periods of inactivity. Given that I feel that his posts in this game have been more insightful than last, I am even less inclined to lynch him. which important reads are you referring to? he's a smart guy and has a tendency to focus on townreads/defending town as scum...which clearly was what he was doing day 2 if not day 1 lol at least the defending players part >< in terms of reservations though he does tend to be less decisive as town? like i've already put out meta points on him; they still hold meh i don't really find him as insightful this game as i'd expect >< there have been several occasions where at best it feels like he's stating things before he's read anything | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 18:35 GMT
#1748
On April 16 2015 03:31 rsoultin wrote: To be honest, right now I'm kind of wondering if the hosts screwed up and didn't make any scum team. Really though, I'm kind of kicking myself. I'll spend maybe another hour or so digging through filters trying to find something, but then I'd better get to my schoolwork, as I'm quite far behind.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 03:23 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 03:19 rsoultin wrote: Okay, fine, his Day 2 was weaker. But I don't care? He played an extremely solid Day 1. Read through his filter again, there's an explanation for everything he's been doing.On April 16 2015 03:02 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 02:54 rsoultin wrote: After rereading Breshke's filter, he is my strongest townread.how much? ummm i know shining, stutters and i all think he's scum, but i don't know about anyone else? and i'm not sure on shining either lol >< He hasn't necessarily been the most forceful player here, but he's shown a clear desire to solve the game. He's been sharing important reads, and he's made a lot of very good observations. I just don't see Breshke being scum here. If you would like a meta reason, Breshke suffered from inactivity in the last game I played with him (Guardians of the Galaxy). He still made several key observations, but ended up being mislynched for his periods of inactivity. Given that I feel that his posts in this game have been more insightful than last, I am even less inclined to lynch him. which important reads are you referring to? he's a smart guy and has a tendency to focus on townreads/defending town as scum...which clearly was what he was doing day 2 if not day 1 lol at least the defending players part >< in terms of reservations though he does tend to be less decisive as town? like i've already put out meta points on him; they still hold meh i don't really find him as insightful this game as i'd expect >< there have been several occasions where at best it feels like he's stating things before he's read anything okay? so who do you think is scum? (for the record, i agree that a solid day 1 is reason enough to give people more time, just see prp...however to refuse to consider his day 2 because of his day 1? that's foolish xP a lot of people fall off as scum after day 1 because it's hard to maintain) I guess the people I'm most suspicious of are Bourneq, The Shining, and maybe Tubesock or Stutters695. I'm leaving you (rsoultin), Half the Sky, and jarjarbinks for later. I'm looking at prplhz presently, though I don't expect to find much that is scummy. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 18:45 GMT
#1750
On April 14 2015 09:29 prplhz wrote: To me, this suggests that when prplhz says "town", in this case, he means "shouldn't be lynched". So when he says that TheBloodyDwarf is town, what he means is that he should never be lynched (or at least until he has reason to think that everyone else is town). And this makes sense. (sorry of the wording here is confusing, feel free to ask if this doesn't make sense)Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 09:24 rsoultin wrote: On April 14 2015 09:19 prplhz wrote: i was taking great offense but i'll pause for a moment to answer your question. it's not about giving him tons of slack, it's about him doing weird shit for no reason. seriously no player in their first game as scum thinks it's a super good idea to say stuff like "i'm mysterious" and "stop digging into that" three times. he's just screaming for attention like that. look at bourneq who is wholly unforgettable and barely doing anything. that's super scummy but people are still like "lets lynch newbies who act weird" even after the plot lynch. the dwarf lynch is as bad as the plot lynch was. the tons of slack comment was about me xP i am giving him tons of slack and trying to pull things from him lol i don't disagree with you? it's the main thing that's been keeping me from voting him up to this point, just because...such a god-awful obviously bad way to play scum >< like i'd feel like the biggest imbecile on the planet if at end of game he ends up being scum just cause he's like the poster child for scummy play this game lol i'm just confused how you have a townread on him because of the things i just said? i'm not going to say "too scummy to be scum" because that's dumb. when a guy say "i'm mysterious" in his first game then he's probably town. there. i don't think we'll get much more out of him this game and i'm not going to lynch him for that unless i end up in a situation with a bunch of people looking more townie than him and we're far from there. rso say something about bourneq Prplhz's filter over this time period does look pretty bad. I like his confidence going into Day 2, though, that seemed rather townie to me. Still, I found his reasoning and read progression hard to follow for Day 2. I suppose I could lynch him Day 3 after all, if he doesn't step up. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 20:54 GMT
#1759
Breshke is town. Prplhz is probably town, assuming he plays fairly well for Day 3. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:03 GMT
#1766
But why would the vigilante possibly save their shot? And why would they ever shoot Stutters695? Newbie games are loaded with vigilante targets. Bourneq was far and away the best candidate. Well, we're now at MYLO. I don't even know if we're allowed to mislynch? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:05 GMT
#1767
##vote no lynch | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:06 GMT
#1768
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:07 GMT
#1769
On April 16 2015 06:03 Trfel wrote: EBWOP: Corrected typo. Sorry.I figured that Half the Sky would die. But why would the vigilante possibly save their shot? And why would they ever shoot Stutters695? Newbie games are loaded with vigilante targets. Bourneq was far and away the best candidate. Well, we're now at MYLO. I don't even know if we're allowed to I'll be out for a while. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:09 GMT
#1770
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:32 GMT
#1772
Don't get me wrong, no lynch is definitely the best play. But lynching feels like it will just speed things up, and I'm not sure how much of a difference it will make. We're kind of dead either way. I can go with whatever people want to do. I also retract my super strong townread on Breshke now. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:42 GMT
#1777
On April 16 2015 06:36 rsoultin wrote: I just eventually realized that I don't think that no lynching has that big of an effect on our chances of winning.nh :/ why the retraction, truffle, out of curiosity? (not saying i disagree >< lol) It gives scum an extra night kill, but they'll just kill our towniest player. And at this point, we kind of need to start assuming that our somewhat towny people are town, since we can't afford to be paranoid about everyone (unless you have a ton of time on your hands, in which case by all means go ahead). I think that the main value of no lynching is to get extra time to solve the game. This helps me quite a bit, since I have a bunch of work to do over the next day (real time), but I'm not sure if it would help enough to warrant dragging the game out for three extra days (real time). It's basically up to everyone else. If they want to play the game and scumhunt, no lynching is the best play. If people are kind of done, I'm fine to just lynch and end it. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 21:50 GMT
#1780
On April 16 2015 06:50 rsoultin wrote: Whoops.-pokes at truffle- i was asking about your bresh read? Not a topic for this time, sorry. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:00 GMT
#1783
On April 16 2015 06:58 Bourneq wrote: To be honest, at the moment I'd rather lynch you than prplhz A no lynch could make sense. But I think our case against prplhz is absolutely lynch worthy. He has pushed both hts and stutters but not got his way. Now they are dead. He defended dwarf most likely to get some town cred to his name after we surely lynch him. He has pushed a lynch on me since I got of on a bad footing and is the newbie that would be easy to be made to look bad. I don't concider his reads or most of his posts to have been helpfull to town at all. He also wasted his vote D2. Not to mention all the other reads against him like the one hts did. I feel very confident in lynching prplhz. ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:01 GMT
#1784
On April 16 2015 06:59 prplhz wrote: Explain?##Vote rsoultin i also know the other two scum | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:03 GMT
#1786
On April 16 2015 07:02 rsoultin wrote: You know, I didn't believe him, but this reaction is extremely scummy. Maybe he really is on to something.lol what? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:04 GMT
#1789
On April 16 2015 07:03 Bourneq wrote: You also want to lynch rsoultin?Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 07:01 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 06:59 prplhz wrote: Explain?##Vote rsoultin i also know the other two scum So that I cant vote him first and get a lynch from being the first vote of course. Why? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:07 GMT
#1795
On April 16 2015 07:04 prplhz wrote: I don't know, to be honest I've sort of been assuming that rsoultin is town all game long. The reason being that it would take a lot of time and effort to try and lynch rsoultin, and I feel that her being mafia isn't terribly likely. And I'd only lynch her if I could be darn sure that I'm right.i can't. rso is scum because she's really good at mafia but she only done mafia things and she's notting putting in that effort she does as town. especially letting two townies getting lynched while acting like she hadn't a clue what a tone read is. anyway i suggest we don't no lynch today, me or rso go go go. i'll tell you the other two scum before i die but i'm a little less sure of them. shoutout to onegu for getting this right on d1. Basically, I'm just putting it off. I'm a procrastinator. I agree with you that rsoultin is capable of playing at a noticeably higher level than this. But I'm not convinced that this makes her scum. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:10 GMT
#1799
On April 16 2015 07:07 Bourneq wrote: What? You realize that it would require more than one vote to lynch someone?Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 07:04 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 07:03 Bourneq wrote: You also want to lynch rsoultin?On April 16 2015 07:01 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 06:59 prplhz wrote: Explain?##Vote rsoultin i also know the other two scum So that I cant vote him first and get a lynch from being the first vote of course. Why? lol no I want to lynch prplhz. He voted rsoultin I asume so that I could not kill prplhz on a tie, so he voted before I did. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:13 GMT
#1801
On April 16 2015 07:12 Bourneq wrote: I guarantee you that the timing of a vote made barely over an hour after the day began will not have any effect on a potential tiebreak for the lynch.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 07:10 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 07:07 Bourneq wrote: What? You realize that it would require more than one vote to lynch someone?On April 16 2015 07:04 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 07:03 Bourneq wrote: You also want to lynch rsoultin?On April 16 2015 07:01 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 06:59 prplhz wrote: Explain?##Vote rsoultin i also know the other two scum So that I cant vote him first and get a lynch from being the first vote of course. Why? lol no I want to lynch prplhz. He voted rsoultin I asume so that I could not kill prplhz on a tie, so he voted before I did. Yea? he got 2 scum buddies ready to defend or vote to save him. So the odds of a tie is quite substantial even with all votes. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:18 GMT
#1805
On April 16 2015 07:17 Bourneq wrote: A vote for a no lynch is still a vote.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 07:13 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 07:12 Bourneq wrote: I guarantee you that the timing of a vote made barely over an hour after the day began will not have any effect on a potential tiebreak for the lynch.On April 16 2015 07:10 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 07:07 Bourneq wrote: What? You realize that it would require more than one vote to lynch someone?On April 16 2015 07:04 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 07:03 Bourneq wrote: You also want to lynch rsoultin?On April 16 2015 07:01 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 06:59 prplhz wrote: Explain?##Vote rsoultin i also know the other two scum So that I cant vote him first and get a lynch from being the first vote of course. Why? lol no I want to lynch prplhz. He voted rsoultin I asume so that I could not kill prplhz on a tie, so he voted before I did. Yea? he got 2 scum buddies ready to defend or vote to save him. So the odds of a tie is quite substantial even with all votes. How come? Quoted from OP "If there is a tie for most votes, whoever most recently had more votes than the other is the person who is up for the lynch." Concidering there is talk of not voting at all then there is quite the chance that it could matter. If we do end up with a tie, which isn't terribly likely, then it will be the order of the last votes that matter, not the first. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 15 2015 22:56 GMT
#1818
I'm kind of surprised at this sudden jump from Breshke. But I must head out now, I'll get back to this later in the day. I will say, though, that if you intend to lynch rsoultin, you had better be darn sure that you are right, and be able to show why. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 02:57 GMT
#1921
I COUNTERCLAIM VIGILANTE XD | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 02:59 GMT
#1922
On April 16 2015 11:57 Trfel wrote: And before you ask, of course I'm joking.HAHAHAHAHA THIS IS AMAZING I COUNTERCLAIM VIGILANTE XD The only real conclusion to be drawn from this is that Breshke and The Shining decided to make this game even more of a nightmare than it already is. I have a history paper due tomorrow, once I turn that in I will try to catch the scum. But it does sort of appear that we need to lynch today now. ##unvote And if there is a real vigilante who is not The Shining, they definitely should counterclaim. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:08 GMT
#1926
On April 16 2015 12:05 rsoultin wrote: I'm well aware that you said it. I said it again. It's important enough that if there is a real vigilante and they don't trust you, then hopefully they trust me. Or vice versa, of course.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 11:59 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 11:57 Trfel wrote: And before you ask, of course I'm joking.HAHAHAHAHA THIS IS AMAZING I COUNTERCLAIM VIGILANTE XD The only real conclusion to be drawn from this is that Breshke and The Shining decided to make this game even more of a nightmare than it already is. I have a history paper due tomorrow, once I turn that in I will try to catch the scum. But it does sort of appear that we need to lynch today now. ##unvote And if there is a real vigilante who is not The Shining, they definitely should counterclaim. parrot :/ Oh, and as for those of you wondering about the night kill (Tubesock?), Half the Sky was the best night kill there. She was definitely playing better than rsoultin in this game, and was being very influential. Killing Half the Sky makes sense in terms of both skill and performance in this game. It doesn't necessarily mean that Half the Sky had incredible reads (though that is certainly a possibility). It does suggest that there isn't another widely townread player with incredible reads, unless of course Half the Sky also had incredible reads. I just find it hard to believe that there is someone with amazing reads this game. In short, I don't think the night kill gives us much information at all. Scum is just headhunting the best players (same with the Holyflare night kill), trying to choke town through lack of skill. And it seems to be working just fine. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:12 GMT
#1929
Well, someone on the scum team probably knows already. So it's free to say in the open. Scum actually has plenty of incentive to counterclaim when town is in MYLO, since all they need is one mislynch. Normally, scum can't counterclaim because after the real town is lynched, they will be lynched themselves, and a one for one trade is good for scum. However, that isn't the case any more. First and foremost, Breshke's play makes absolutely no sense whatsoever from a town perspective, unless he was trying to draw a shot. But that doesn't seem to be indicated in his filter, he seems to be trying to draw out a counterclaim (in this case, a fake claim). And while I could definitely see mafia counterclaiming here, I can also very easily see the real vigilante counterclaim. So basically, Breshke's plan seems to be attempting to draw out the mafia to counterclaim on himself (a seemingly vulnerable target) and then rescind his claim, and have a solid townread actually claim vigilante, thus dooming the scum counterclaimer. Breshke, is this a correct interpretation of your intentions? The glaring problem with this is that if the real vigilante counterclaims first, he gets absolutely nothing from it. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:23 GMT
#1934
I would say more, but this is a newbie game. Thus it's not appropriate. However, perhaps next newbie game, we should make sure that everyone gets coaches? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:28 GMT
#1940
Now I have to play the game. This is so interesting. Even if it's an unbelievable mess and destruction of everything that mafia is supposed to be, it's extremely interesting. So much for that paper I have to write. Anyway, I apologize for getting a bit heated this game. I'll try to settle down. There's really nothing to get upset over, it's not like I've never messed up (or even that I've been playing all that well this game). It's a game for fun, winning is secondary. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:31 GMT
#1943
On April 16 2015 12:26 Breshke wrote: He's right.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 12:25 The Shining wrote: On April 16 2015 12:23 Trfel wrote: Furthermore, if we have a real veteran, they should counterclaim Breshke. I would say more, but this is a newbie game. Thus it's not appropriate. However, perhaps next newbie game, we should make sure that everyone gets coaches? I've played 3-4'games here, I think. This is 4th or 5th. I hold n illusions, I am definitely still a newb. he probably means me dude dw it fine I have to claim here or town just keeps going the wrong way. Let's be honest. If he really is the veteran here, he never gets night killed. And with a vigilante who already fired, scum just roleblocks their target consistently, so the veteran is worthless until the roleblocker is dead. To focus town's discussion in the right way, it's definitely worth it for him to claim when he did. I apologize for my words, they were not called for. What happened happened, time to move on. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:33 GMT
#1945
Again, if no one else would, that's okay, we can just lynch today. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:39 GMT
#1952
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:42 GMT
#1954
If Breshke is not actually the veteran, he absolutely gets lynched here. No possibility whatsoever for him to rescind his claim. If The Shining is not actually the vigilante, he absolutely gets lynched here. No possibility whatsoever for him to rescind his claim. Therefore, it is imperative that if Breshke is not the real veteran and/or The Shining is not the real vigilante, that the real power role(s) must claim as soon as possible. Just to make it absolutely clear. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:54 GMT
#1960
On April 16 2015 12:50 Tubesock wrote: If it's going to happen, I'd rather it happen sooner than later.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 12:42 Trfel wrote: Can everyone agree on this? If Breshke is not actually the veteran, he absolutely gets lynched here. No possibility whatsoever for him to rescind his claim. If The Shining is not actually the vigilante, he absolutely gets lynched here. No possibility whatsoever for him to rescind his claim. Therefore, it is imperative that if Breshke is not the real veteran and/or The Shining is not the real vigilante, that the real power role(s) must claim as soon as possible. Just to make it absolutely clear. This is just opening it up for mafia to fakeclaim and then we fight it out on who is scummier Breshke or whoever claims. Is this any better of a position? Those who post without counterclaiming lose all chance of counterclaiming (at least, in my eyes). It is simply disastrous for town to have a late counterclaim. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 03:57 GMT
#1963
On April 16 2015 12:55 Tubesock wrote: Night kills aren't going to say very much at this point anyway.We also lose out on more information. If mafia know/believe the claims, then it doesn't give town any information on the nightkills but gives mafia their next two targets easy and no one has to explain why they are alive assuming a top "town" is mafia. Sure, settling the claims now gives scum more information. But it gives town far more information (two roles and two confirmed town, while scum already knows the alignments). I don't care who mafia shoots. Town needs the truth right now, or there is no way to win the game. Power roles are a supplement to analysis, not a substitute. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:08 GMT
#1969
My personal preference is (and always has been) a no lynch. However, no lynching has to be widely agreed upon, and it's not something worth arguing about. I will follow the thread sentiment on this one, as I must. The blue claims absolutely affect my increased desire to no lynch. One of the main reasons to lynch today was to kill the roleblocker and buy another mislynch, but now this won't happen. The Shining, do you not realize how complex this all is? You can't simply expect me to have all of the answers. You're town until counterclaimed. And at this point, only Bourneq really has the chance to try and counterclaim you (anyone else had better really make it worth the wait). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:17 GMT
#1974
On April 16 2015 13:13 rsoultin wrote: Let's assume that Breshke is mafia.in the meantime i'm not sure that it's a good idea for vet to cc if breshke is fake-claiming again -_- meh If the real veteran is currently a townread player, they claim, and Breshke dies. Good! If the real veteran is currently a scumread player, then they're in a rough spot. But if they don't claim, town basically loses automatically. And since they will not be shot, they need to claim. This also gives town as much time as possible to try and figure out the truth. Am I wrong in this assessment? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:25 GMT
#1978
On April 16 2015 13:21 The Shining wrote: Is it not obvious who was vigilante shot and who was nightkilled? Half the Sky was the obvious night kill, clear as day. The only other possibility was Breshke, for his various mentions of power roles and setup speculation. No vigilante would shoot Half the Sky, and no mafia team would shoot Stutters695 instead of Half the Sky here.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 13:09 Tubesock wrote: On April 16 2015 13:03 The Shining wrote: Trfel, you've been flip floppy a lot today. You offered no lynch, then back tracked. Your eon reaction seemed a little fake. You let off some anger then rescinded it. Now you're back to no lynch. Could this be because you know who the blues are now? What is your current read on me? My recent actions. My vig claim. I need you to stop posting flip flops and find scum/start poe. HTS defended you when I called you out on your vote to hammer Dwarf mislynch over prpl. This could explain HTS nk. If she's dead, she never revisits Trfel. If Breshke is in fact vet, then that's 3 town on Prpl. Stutters, hts, breshke. The other is jjb, who I'm not convinced is town but this is partially due to bias from our last game together. RSo, I'd actually like to see your current thoughts on JJB. This, coupled with the fact that Trfel hammered Dwarf, shows me Prpl is scum. Whether it was Breshke panicking and setting up to bus Prl, or Trfel hammering to save scummate Prpl, the conclusion is still that Prpl is scum in this world. I think I'm voting Prpl, provided Bresh isn't cc'd. Note: I'm on the subway typing this post. No phone service. The last post when I started was Breshke's unvote post. Anything after that, I haven't seen or read yet so I apologize if the timing of this post seems awkward. Did you notice the other person who immediately noticed that Half the Sky was vigi shot? Do you mean the fact that Trfels reaction that I called fake had already assumed Stutters was vigi shot? And was that you trying to get me to slip? I shot Stutters, not HTS. Are you really suspicious of me for this? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:27 GMT
#1980
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:32 GMT
#1984
On April 16 2015 13:27 Tubesock wrote: Anyone with reasonable TL mafia experience could see that Half the Sky was the night kill there.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 13:25 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 13:21 The Shining wrote: Is it not obvious who was vigilante shot and who was nightkilled? Half the Sky was the obvious night kill, clear as day. The only other possibility was Breshke, for his various mentions of power roles and setup speculation. No vigilante would shoot Half the Sky, and no mafia team would shoot Stutters695 instead of Half the Sky here.On April 16 2015 13:09 Tubesock wrote: On April 16 2015 13:03 The Shining wrote: Trfel, you've been flip floppy a lot today. You offered no lynch, then back tracked. Your eon reaction seemed a little fake. You let off some anger then rescinded it. Now you're back to no lynch. Could this be because you know who the blues are now? What is your current read on me? My recent actions. My vig claim. I need you to stop posting flip flops and find scum/start poe. HTS defended you when I called you out on your vote to hammer Dwarf mislynch over prpl. This could explain HTS nk. If she's dead, she never revisits Trfel. If Breshke is in fact vet, then that's 3 town on Prpl. Stutters, hts, breshke. The other is jjb, who I'm not convinced is town but this is partially due to bias from our last game together. RSo, I'd actually like to see your current thoughts on JJB. This, coupled with the fact that Trfel hammered Dwarf, shows me Prpl is scum. Whether it was Breshke panicking and setting up to bus Prl, or Trfel hammering to save scummate Prpl, the conclusion is still that Prpl is scum in this world. I think I'm voting Prpl, provided Bresh isn't cc'd. Note: I'm on the subway typing this post. No phone service. The last post when I started was Breshke's unvote post. Anything after that, I haven't seen or read yet so I apologize if the timing of this post seems awkward. Did you notice the other person who immediately noticed that Half the Sky was vigi shot? Do you mean the fact that Trfels reaction that I called fake had already assumed Stutters was vigi shot? And was that you trying to get me to slip? I shot Stutters, not HTS. Are you really suspicious of me for this? I am! But I could be wrong. I thought Stutters was blue hinting pretty good. Plus, he was showing signs of turning on his towniness. She made a legacy, carefully posted it with maybe ten seconds to End of Night. Who else was a top night kill? Breshke is the only possibility. Stutters695's "blue hinting" was garbage. If he really is blue, that's extremely obvious, and of course mafia saw it. Honestly, that phrasing should only be used when you're under extreme suspicion, such that it's nearly necessary to claim outright anyway. That's why scum shouldn't give any real weight to it, given the context and circumstances. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:37 GMT
#1989
On April 16 2015 13:28 Tubesock wrote: Stutters695 was playing fairly well towards the end.Stutters was also trying to initiate contact and dialoque with Prplhz. He was trying to lead town and become a consensus builder. You can totally disagree, but this shows you are not thinking about the game as much as you are letting on. But THAT DOES NOT MATTER WHATSOEVER FOR THE NIGHT KILL. Half the Sky is a proven player, townread by everyone, already survived pressure from rsoultin (arguably the hardest hitting player in the game, regardless of her alignment), and has been consistently playing at a high level and driving town. And Half the Sky was extremely vocal about lynching prplhz, so you can't argue that Stutters695 was killed for this reason. Instead, you suggest that mafia would kill someone who is still (at least somewhat) suspected by several people (myself included), and who only recently started playing at a truly high level? For that one sentence that some people decided to (in my opinion, stupidly) interpret as a blue claim? It's quite possible that by the end of Day 3, Stutters695 would have been a universal townread. But why would mafia take a gamble when they have a sure thing? There is no reason to assume that Stutters695 would become more townread or more influential than Half the Sky. Mafia doesn't take chances, mafia goes for the solid plays, especially in a newbie game with two straight mislynches. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:40 GMT
#1991
On April 16 2015 13:35 Tubesock wrote: I thought about it before the night ended. Long before. And I decided that mafia would kill Half the Sky. Come End of Night, there was no more thinking to be done.Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 13:31 Breshke wrote: Um so I also was one who "knew" stutters was vigi shot and not HTS if you look at my vigi claim i said i shot stutters. It was trefels psot that amde me actually think about it and when you do its obvious. Like anyone who was going to shoot HTS wouldn't have waited this long. So if your going to start pushing scum on people for saying stutters was vigi shot you should include me. Right there. You still had to "think" about it. Plus, I'm still heavily considering you to be mafia, so yeah of course I'm going to push it on you too. But you're not as immediate either. If anything, I think that this shows that I have a reasonable awareness of what is happening in the thread such that I can predict the night kill (to be fair, it's not hard to do at all). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:46 GMT
#1995
On April 16 2015 13:40 Tubesock wrote: Well, I wasn't townreading him.I don't think you can just immediately KNOW. Maybe it's just my point of view though. I think Stutters could have been a good night kill also. I have to check to see if you were towning STutters or not. If you weren't then you may have a good argument. But if you were towning him it's something I'm going to be thinking a lot about. Anyway, I have a hockey game. Be back in a couple hours. I hate using player experience as an argument. But I want this settled once and for all. Tubesock, I've played more games of mafia on TL than you have. I was able to predict the mafia's night kill before it happened, through methods that I have already described. Furthermore, two other players have agreed with me that the night kill was obvious. You don't really have any grounds to assume that I am incapable of predicting the mafia night kill in this case, especially given that rsoultin and Breshke expressed similar sentiments. Imagine me scumreading Holyflare for catching mafia when I couldn't see it myself, because he couldn't possibly have seen something that I didn't. It wouldn't work out at all. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 04:50 GMT
#1997
On April 16 2015 13:44 Tubesock wrote: You really think it would be a good idea for me to vocally argue for a no lynch while other people want to lynch? So we have the normal argument of who to lynch, and the additional argument of whether or not to even lynch?Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 13:37 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 13:28 Tubesock wrote: Stutters695 was playing fairly well towards the end.Stutters was also trying to initiate contact and dialoque with Prplhz. He was trying to lead town and become a consensus builder. You can totally disagree, but this shows you are not thinking about the game as much as you are letting on. But THAT DOES NOT MATTER WHATSOEVER FOR THE NIGHT KILL. Half the Sky is a proven player, townread by everyone, already survived pressure from rsoultin (arguably the hardest hitting player in the game, regardless of her alignment), and has been consistently playing at a high level and driving town. And Half the Sky was extremely vocal about lynching prplhz, so you can't argue that Stutters695 was killed for this reason. Instead, you suggest that mafia would kill someone who is still (at least somewhat) suspected by several people (myself included), and who only recently started playing at a truly high level? For that one sentence that some people decided to (in my opinion, stupidly) interpret as a blue claim? It's quite possible that by the end of Day 3, Stutters695 would have been a universal townread. But why would mafia take a gamble when they have a sure thing? There is no reason to assume that Stutters695 would become more townread or more influential than Half the Sky. Mafia doesn't take chances, mafia goes for the solid plays, especially in a newbie game with two straight mislynches. Point isn't that Stutters was a good nightkill or not. Point is that you immediately knew it was HtS. I agree she's better. You didn't pause to consider it or anything. you immediately was like "No lynch" then how many posts later "bah we can lynch". I think this is all an act man. Anyway I have to leave for reals. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 05:11 GMT
#2006
On April 16 2015 14:06 The Shining wrote: Why don't votes lie? Votes don't suggest anything. I don't see a reason to be sure that we've ever seriously had scum up for lynch.I think I can buy Trfels defense of his eon reaction, at least for now. Bresh also assumed Stutters was my shot, as did RSo, and I knew it was my shot. It's wifom at best to argue Trf couldn't know which was NKd. But this doesn't mean I think Trfel is town. The flip flopping doesn't feel right, even though I towned him before. Hence why I'd push Prpl. Votes don't lie. Every scenario I come up with leads to Prpl scum. Him flipping scum also gives us the most information. Especially since he's apparently one of Trfels strongest town reads. Or we no lynch, I die tonight(1 less Prpl lynch supporter) & town has one less confirmed town to go with. This could be Trfels scum motivation for a no lynch, if he is scum. We gain no new info but one less confirmed town. I'm not completely sold on Bresh either but without a cc, I have to believe for now. Sure, prplhz narrowly avoided being lynched, and town died instead. But how does that say anything, other than some of us were wrong? And I already said that if prplhz continues to play in this fashion, I can't continue to townread him. I need to take a detailed look at his meta. I'm not going to make any careful reads until the later part of the day. I have a paper to write, I'm busy. I'll keep up with the thread and share thoughts, but I won't seriously push anything until I'm confident (which I can't do without an extremely detailed analysis). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 05:17 GMT
#2008
On April 16 2015 14:11 The Shining wrote: Hm, this actually makes a lot of sense.Ebwop: stupid fucking phone. Last question should be: You don't think if Breshke voted you with Prpl, the other 2 scum wouldn't join in and make sure you got to 4 first? Then it becomes a vote race. A shitty one, as the counter wagon would've likely been me. Looks like an attempt for scum to win. It's a terrible reason to scumread prplhz, but it does negate the reason to townread him (pushing on rsoultin). Tubesock also gets no town points for trying to push on me, since it is so soon after prplhz got town points (now retracted) from pushing rsoultin. It doesn't work twice (or in this case, once). I'll take a very close look at prplhz tomorrow. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 05:27 GMT
#2012
On April 16 2015 14:19 The Shining wrote: Of course voting analysis is good, I'd be a fool if I said otherwise. (well, I am a fool anyway, but not for this reason)Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 14:11 Trfel wrote: On April 16 2015 14:06 The Shining wrote: Why don't votes lie? Votes don't suggest anything. I don't see a reason to be sure that we've ever seriously had scum up for lynch.I think I can buy Trfels defense of his eon reaction, at least for now. Bresh also assumed Stutters was my shot, as did RSo, and I knew it was my shot. It's wifom at best to argue Trf couldn't know which was NKd. But this doesn't mean I think Trfel is town. The flip flopping doesn't feel right, even though I towned him before. Hence why I'd push Prpl. Votes don't lie. Every scenario I come up with leads to Prpl scum. Him flipping scum also gives us the most information. Especially since he's apparently one of Trfels strongest town reads. Or we no lynch, I die tonight(1 less Prpl lynch supporter) & town has one less confirmed town to go with. This could be Trfels scum motivation for a no lynch, if he is scum. We gain no new info but one less confirmed town. I'm not completely sold on Bresh either but without a cc, I have to believe for now. Sure, prplhz narrowly avoided being lynched, and town died instead. But how does that say anything, other than some of us were wrong? And I already said that if prplhz continues to play in this fashion, I can't continue to townread him. I need to take a detailed look at his meta. I'm not going to make any careful reads until the later part of the day. I have a paper to write, I'm busy. I'll keep up with the thread and share thoughts, but I won't seriously push anything until I'm confident (which I can't do without an extremely detailed analysis). Call it confidence. Think back to my last game with you. Or read any one of my town games. If there's one thing I've ever done right in mafia, it's vote analysis. And I pride myself on it. It's how I caught JJB and forced him to NK me that game. It's how I called out Celestial and Scott in my first game, even though we lost. Are you seriously telling me of all people that votes are not a key tool to scum hunting? And that's my point, Trfel. It doesn't say anything until he flips scum. When he does, it puts your hammer on Dwarf in a different light. And it sheds light on all his interactions with the players that are still alive. Remember that Stutters already cased Prpl, too. And HTS was vocally against Prpl. There are plenty of reasons to scum Prpl, not just vote analysis. I guess I'll see you next time. Really looking forward to your re analysis on Prpl. I just don't see how to effectively use voting analysis in this case, with a bunch of townies beating themselves up and no guarantee that scum was ever up for lynch. Unless you can show otherwise, voting analysis is mainly unflipped association analysis. Dead people are suspicions of prplhz. That doesn't make him scum? I respect their opinions, just like I respect Onegu's opinions. It's something to take into consideration, but not proof. I already showed why I don't like Stutters695's case on prplhz (maybe prplhz is scum, but not for those reasons, unless I'm thinking of the wrong post). I have yet to see anyone explain how prplhz's Day 1 play is from mafia. It seems that I'll need to check his meta myself, unless someone else wants to analyze it and post actual (unbiased) results. But prplhz was actively leading the thread, which isn't something he needs to do as mafia (and isn't something that I expected from him as either alignment). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 05:38 GMT
#2020
On April 16 2015 14:36 jarjarbinks wrote: Hm, thanks for quoting that post. It actually looks quite suspicious Show nested quote + On April 13 2015 13:51 jarjarbinks wrote: On April 13 2015 13:39 rsoultin wrote: On April 13 2015 07:54 jarjarbinks wrote: Wow....hope to actually play with you next time HF. Reasons why HF was killed that I can think of 1. HF can read another vet well or is good at this game? I have no experience with the guy 2. Scum doesn't want to reveal anything 3. Scum is not worried about anyone so far #2 is probably most likely...if anyone think #3 is very possible we might need to check our highly townread people in the game (bresh? tube?) or doublecheck at the highly scumread right now (dwarf? stutters?) this post was interesting to me have you looked into who you think is scum given the second option yet? I started it, im super behind on my reads sheet so I tried to go with whoever it appeared were each persons top 3 scum. It has a lot of issues with is but in general there were some people who weren't being scummed much and some people who were being towned a ton. People who weren't on top town or top scum the most: Onegu HTS JJB Tube People who were top 3 town most: Prp Tube Bresh JJB Granted, this analysis has flaws. And note I AM ON BOTH, so if anything it I'm showing that I am not altering the analysis AT ALL. I think if I had my reads stuff updated this would be better, and there was a few people that it was hard to tell who their top scum/town were while others it was easier to ascertain. this one tube dissed it ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 05:52 GMT
#2029
Good night, and happy scumhunting. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 15:00 GMT
#2086
On April 16 2015 18:01 Tubesock wrote: Just dropping in to say that this says nothing. Assuming that Tubesock's scum team (me, Breshke, and Bourneq) is correct:I think I know what's going on. While I think I'm right, I will acknowledge I was wrong on TheBloodyDwarf. I don't always get all the scum, but I at least get two. Anyway, what I'm thinking. Soren333 was widely towned. Others too probably but I think he was the most towned. In his filter he scummed TheBloodyDwarf, Onegu, Prplhz, Slotspot, and Bourneq. Holyflare subs in. So, doubly obvious night kill. Half the Sky was also widely towned. Trfel and many others of you already agreed she was the obvious night kill. What were her big things? Big case on Onegu. Who was under suspicion? Breshke. Who was scumread? Bourneq. Plotspot. Show nested quote + On April 12 2015 06:01 LoneMeow wrote: plotspot the Vanilla Townie is lynched! Final vote count: TheBloodyDwarf (1): Breshke (0): The Shining (1): plotspot Bourneq (0): plotspot (7): prplhz (0): Stutters695 (4): prplhz, Tubesock, TheBloodyDwarf, Half the Sky Here's Half the Sky's assessment of Onegu's vote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/480171-newbie-student-mafia-vii?page=61#1220 I also think that Onegu's vote on Breshke was a joke. He didn't say hardly anything about it (typical Onegu behavior though) and then came in calling us idiots for not being on the "scumclaim". I asked him where his vote was and then "oh "forgot" ##Vote: ![]() Patterns.... TheBloodyDwarf Show nested quote + On April 15 2015 06:01 LoneMeow wrote: TheBloodyDwarf the Vanilla Townie is lynched! Final vote count: TheBloodyDwarf (5): Bourneq, The Shining, Tubesock, rsoultin, Trfel Breshke (0): The Shining (1): Bourneq (1): prplhz Half the Sky (0): prplhz (4): Stutters695, jarjarbinks, Half the Sky, Breshke Stutters695 (0): Stutters695 while vigi shot, there is still information. It's not as solid or anything, but things of note. He scummed Breshke. Trfel also said Stuters695 was on his most suspicious list before Stutters died. Breshke last words about Stutters while alive were "I can't vote him now but I hope I don't regret it." then votes The Shining. I'll have individual cases on the three as well tomorrow. We have time to talk about it. First. Replacements don't necessarily copy the reads of the player they replaced, since that simply doesn't work. Holyflare had no reads. Second, Half the Sky was townreading me. She made a case on me at one point, and was then townreading me. I would have no reason to get rid of her except purely for her influence and scumhunting. Furthermore, her strongest scumread was prplhz, who you are saying is town here. Was this the mafia team you are suggesting, I would kill rsoultin, who was townreading prplhz. Third, Bourneq is a strange situation (assuming he is scum). I don't think there is anyone who isn't willing to lynch him at this point, it's just risky since he is hard to read. You simply can't protect him through night kills, the way you protect him is being more vocal and making other people appear scummier, so they get lynched instead. Fourth, me having Stutters695 as suspicious when he died makes me scum why? Because I was wrong? You don't have any reasons why I am scum. All you have is a misrepresented explanation that portrays events to fit a preconceived notion, which still doesn't suggest that I am scum. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 15:18 GMT
#2087
Breshke Trfel rsoultin prplhz jarjarbinks Bourneq The Shining Tubesock This means that three of the following are mafia: rsoultin, prplhz, jarjarbinks, Bourneq, and Tubesock The problem arises in that I found reason to townread four of these (all except Bourneq), and reason to not lynch Bourneq. My initial suspicion is that jarjarbinks is mafia here. He tricked rsoultin and I last game. Here, he started off very strong, but I get the feeling that his play has fallen off significantly. I know that rsoultin says this isn't alignment indicative, but it still seems suspicious to me. Furthermore, that jarjarbinks post that I mentioned does look suspicious, as he is doing analysis without conclusion (analysis that can't lead to a conclusion, which he did last game as mafia) and bothered to justify his analysis (what motivation would have have to lie?). I still lean towards rsoultin being town. While her play hasn't been at the highest possible level, it's definitely within her town range. I need to take a close look at her filter, but I expect her to be town here. Tubesock is difficult. I could easily see him being mafia here except for his two crazy theories (first for TheBloodyDwarf being godfather, second for me, Breshke, and Bourneq being the scum team). I'm not sure if he is capable of this as mafia. However, I notice that his second crazy theory was posted after the claims, thus after he started getting suspected. Prplhz is looking more and more suspicious with time. I have yet to check his meta, but it is easier for more experienced players to seem impressive in a newbie game. This could help explain prplhz as scum. I'll take a guess for now that the mafia team is jarjarbinks, prplhz, and Bourneq. I probably won't get a chance to check this until this evening at earliest, though I'll try my best to keep up with the thread (you guys are interesting, and funny!). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 15:35 GMT
#2088
Assuming that Tubesock is mafia, with regards to his TheBloodyDwarf godfather theory: Something would have to prompt him. Perhaps he is the godfather himself, or perhaps someone else was the godfather and had a discussion about playing to a cop check. The problem is that mafia knows the setup, and knows that there is no cop in this game. Thus, in all likelihood, the godfather sees their role and then sees the setup and knows that they are effectively a mafia goon. And they wouldn't even get to the point of thinking about how to play for a cop check. Furthermore, Tubesock hasn't ever played mafia before. It would be very impressive for him to be able to do this in his first game as mafia. I need to check again to see how his play is outside of these two main theories, but for now, I don't really think he is mafia. On an unrelated note, I don't think that rsoultin still being alive says much about jarjarbinks's alignment. Last game, jarjarbinks's desire to remain hidden helped lead him to kill rsoultin on Night 1 (though, that was the correct kill regardless). However, that was a 9 player game, thus there were only two mafia, and the other one was a lurker. This game has three mafia, and so killing jarjarbinks's sister isn't necessarily a priority for scum here. I would definitely see mafia killing Holyflare here no matter what, and I can easily see mafia killing Half the Sky over rsoultin, especially knowing that Breshke is scumreading rsoultin. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 15:50 GMT
#2091
On April 17 2015 00:46 prplhz wrote: Now that the veteran has claimed, this argument is basically nullified. Since mafia would just leave the veteran alive until the end of the game.unless, there was some crap about us getting another lynch if we lynch roleblocker? i guess we have 33% chance of hitting him if we lynch jjb/bourneq and then you guys can lynch me all you want | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 15:50 GMT
#2092
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 16:16 GMT
#2095
On April 17 2015 01:10 prplhz wrote: Of course that's a possibility.like if i say "this and that makes me town" aren't you just going to say "HAH! that's just something you did so that later you could say 'this and that makes me town'"? It would just be nice to see the reasons why you say you are town so I can see how they compare with my reasons, and plus it could save me some time. But it's not a big deal if you don't want to share, I understand why. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 16:31 GMT
#2098
I'll probably have to take a detailed look at your filter and meta very soon anyway. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 16:39 GMT
#2102
On April 17 2015 01:35 prplhz wrote: Nope. I'll lynch rsoultin if you convince me that rsoultin is scum.trfel if i convince you that i am town will you lynch rso today? Because rsoultin (if she is scum) is probably the hardest player to catch, I'm not very interested in catching her today. If I conclude that she is town (which I currently consider fairly likely), I wouldn't have the time to do much else at all. Therefore, I would prefer to look at other scum and look at rsoultin more closely tomorrow. There are two situations which would lead me to lynch rsoultin first. One is no-lynching, such that I have time to look into it properly. Another is if someone else provides strong evidence that rsoultin is scum. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 16:45 GMT
#2104
On April 17 2015 01:42 prplhz wrote: I am not really sure yet. There seem to be a lot of people who want to lynch you. It really depends on your filter and your meta.okay who the fuck will you lynch then if you wont lynch me? will you just lynch jjb then bourneq and then me? because if i'm going to get lynched i prefer it being today. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 17:34 GMT
#2111
Later tonight I should have more time to play the game. I will do my best to prove my alignment (through my scumhunting) and to catch the scum. I'm looking forward to it quite a bit. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 18:02 GMT
#2117
Sorry, but I can't lynch an non-cc'd blue. Breshke is absolutely town unless someone counterclaims. Everything else simply doesn't matter. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 18:34 GMT
#2126
His early posts seem to be more white knighting, and he's providing fewer useful scumreads than I expected. Perhaps it's just confirmation bias, though. When I get out of class, I'll take a look at the rest of it. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 20:30 GMT
#2149
On April 17 2015 03:43 Tubesock wrote: Only what I collected on you in my four catch-up posts, and what came up in discussion.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 03:34 Trfel wrote: Just read over the first page of Tubesock's filter. He actually could be scum here. His early posts seem to be more white knighting, and he's providing fewer useful scumreads than I expected. Perhaps it's just confirmation bias, though. When I get out of class, I'll take a look at the rest of it. How much thought have you put into me before this post? On April 17 2015 03:37 prplhz wrote: I had five minutes. You and prplhz are bigger tasks. I posted what I did because I wanted to see what people said, and in hopes that others would look into the things that I mentioned.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 03:34 Trfel wrote: Just read over the first page of Tubesock's filter. He actually could be scum here. His early posts seem to be more white knighting, and he's providing fewer useful scumreads than I expected. Perhaps it's just confirmation bias, though. When I get out of class, I'll take a look at the rest of it. why do you make a giant post saying you'll look over me and rso and then you go and look over tube? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 20:51 GMT
#2150
On April 17 2015 03:37 Tubesock wrote: Up to this point, you've said absolutely nothing.So far we have murdered two town. There's no one who stands out as mafia just yet. Several of you have mentioned how bad a spot town is in right now. What are our options? Breshke does some hail mary play. Trfel mentions no lynch, oh scratch that let's lynch we can have all the blues out themselves. Why the hurry on knowing the blues? Maybe it's just bad play on my part but I think that making Mafia guess for another day could be a good idea. But this argument isn't important. Prplhz is at least looking in different areas (albeit wrong on Rsoultin). I can see he's reevaluating and thinking about things. And not bluehunting or centering around policy talk. He's pushing a lynch. I was first suspicious of Trfel when Stutters695 posted this: Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 14:36 Stutters695 wrote: On April 14 2015 13:17 Tubesock wrote: On April 14 2015 13:10 Trfel wrote: I agree that The Shining/Ace1312's slot doesn't look very good, but that's mostly for activity. I'm ignoring it for now. At the same time, I almost wonder if he could have an easier time jumping into the thread if he is scum? Scum replacements don't really have to read the thread, they can sort of make stuff up and hope to get by. Especially in a newbie game. Obviously that isn't a very effective way to play, but many people claim to play scum without reading the thread. I don't think I agree with this at all. People are asking you stuff since you're here. If he showed up people will be asking him stuff too. In my 2nd game a newbie (I don't remember the name of it, but you were nightkilled N1 trfel in it) There was a replacement scum Scott1313371234123541235 for Gumdrops. Gum made 2 posts and was replaced. Scott's entrance was a thread sentiment list post with nice little links to the post for each player that expressed his read. He HAD to show us he read the thread and was eventually caught up. He would have died right then. Same with you, you HAVE to show you've read town or mafia. Like, you get leeway but not a pardon. This is a real good post. Followed by this: Show nested quote + On April 14 2015 14:37 Stutters695 wrote: On April 14 2015 14:00 Trfel wrote: So far, I'm not impressed with TheBloodyDwarf at all. His play is clearly not towny, there is no question of that. I guess I could see him being a stubborn SC2 Mafia player who is new to a forum mafia environment. But then, he clearly stated, in bold, that this isn't SC2 mafia. From there, I expected to see him attempting to play the forum mafia style (not necessarily succeeding, just attempting). And I haven't seen that at all yet. His late vote without explanation pushed him from null to scum lean. My current lynch pool is as follows (no particular order): TheBloodyDwarf, Stutters695, The Shining, and Bourneq Is this guy scum? I really want to lynch him. I didn't understand why Stutters695 would say what he did. I didn't really say anything in my post. I was defending The Shining on the weak premise that I didn't think town necessarily had to prove that they read the thread as fast as possible. It wasn't even a real defense, it was simply give the guy some time. Trfel was all up in his ass. I then realized I haven't read Onegu's filter in awhile. I basically dropped it once Trfel started doing his summaries in spoilers. That definitely looked like a ton of work. A little later I noticed something kinda funny. Prplhz and Stutters695 were going at each other for the same reasons. TheBloodyDwarf tinfoils me. The replacements are going at it. It was ironic. I was just getting a nagging feeling that Prplhz and Stutters695 were both town. Trfel I didn't see anything scummy in. He was putting in a lot of work and showing that he was thinking about the game. He was super town. I started to reread Onegu. Half the Sky has a good case on him. I already posted it, it was big I doubt any of you missed it when she posted it. Onegu's "big" contribution is his suspicion of Rsoultin. Which is if you guys bother to look into his filter is because she didn't town him, and Rsoultin can read him better than anyone. She must be mafia. But uh, what happens if HE is mafia? On April 17 2015 03:37 Tubesock wrote: I care about Onegu's reads because he is smart, and I know that he is town. I don't care to investigate Onegu's alignment or argue the specifics of it, and for obvious reasons. If you choose to scumread or townread me for Onegu's play, fine.I thought his actions on Breshke, and his eod vote was weird. I attributed it to the drugs. He replaced out, so it's obviously legit. But it also seemed like he wasn't particularly serious about his Breshke vote, and knew that by the time he got back in thread there would be another wagon that will look good to jump on to. Sure enough a "scumclaim". Onegu towned Bourneq for scumming TheBloodyDwarf. Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 23:33 Onegu wrote: On April 10 2015 18:54 Bourneq wrote: Good morning! Dwarf I am interested in how you did not know what scum means. It is meantioned twice in the OP and twice in the followup post right after. Seeing how you missed the part about editing it makes a bit more sense since you obviously did not read the thing. But under coaches for example it says Town: Scum: It is pretty hard to missunderstand what scum in this context means. As a fellow newbie I understand you could be speaking the truth but did you really not read the OP? Prplhz I actually like this post, wouldn't lynch him today for this post Before this Onegu does give Bourneq heat. I think it's safe to "bus" him in this case as Onegu isn't exactly known to be forceful with his lynch targets. Alone this reaction means nothing. But in context.... But you know, he did claim town and not VT so we shouldn't be worried. Show nested quote + On April 10 2015 08:20 Onegu wrote: It's my meta if I claimed VT that's when you should look out for me. So, Onegu's play is what Trfel is stuck with. He's smart, he knows he can't explain any of it. The best strategy by far is to compensate for it. He knows that he has a reputation for solid case building and analysis. As town he knows he will get some heat if he doesn't perform. He did a little, but it didn't last very long and he quickly became massively townread for his massive effort. On April 17 2015 03:37 Tubesock wrote: There are two points here. The first point you make is that I went back and forth between lynching and no-lynching.HtS and Stutters die. 3 minutes after Day post: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 06:03 Trfel wrote: I figured that Half the Sky would die. But why would the vigilante possibly save their shot? And why would they ever shoot Stutters695? Newbie games are loaded with vigilante targets. Bourneq was far and away the best candidate. Well, we're now at MYLO. I don't even know if we're allowed to mislynch(corrects this to No Lynch)? Pushes No Lynch. Thirty minutes later: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 06:32 Trfel wrote: I guess, part of me is tempted to just go ahead and lynch today now. Don't get me wrong, no lynch is definitely the best play. But lynching feels like it will just speed things up, and I'm not sure how much of a difference it will make. We're kind of dead either way. I can go with whatever people want to do. I also retract my super strong townread on Breshke now. Reread the thread from Day 3 post on. To me I think mafia Trfel has every incentive to post exactly like he is. There is a light at the end of the tunnel for him if we lynch today. This could be a town Trfel too. I read Breshke's and Trfel's interactions together and I can't help to think it looks like a play. Like teamwork. Then I have the revelation. MAFIA CAN ALL WORK ON THE THREAD ANALYSIS THAT TRFEL DID. He's not necessarily the only one doing it. I have played team sports all my life. I can't imagine the mafia team in their own private QT wouldn't coordinate and execute plays. I get many don't, they stay fluid and whatnot but it seems silly to discard that. Trfel could be town. All I ask is reread the guy and think about how a scumTrfel replacement would have to act. How is Day 3 play so far can easily be mafia motivated. He's fully capable of playing this way as mafia and he wants the lynch today. He doesn't think we are going to lynch mafia. I've already explained that there is value in no-lynching, because we get time to investigate things and make the best decision. However, there is no value in no-lynching if people want to lynch, or if people don't want to use the extra time to actually work. If you took a closer look at your scumread of me, you would notice that I have said this multiple times, and rsoultin (who you are townreading) has expressed the same sentiments. Furthermore, if you look at my past games, you will see that when I (and the rest of town) is feeling tired and in a bad spot in the game, I'm willing to take a riskier lynch to speed things along (see Down Under 2, where I lynched someone who might be scum over someone who was guaranteed to be scum under the assumption that town wouldn't care enough to investigate properly such that the additional time would make a difference). Second point, the entire mafia team worked on the analysis that I did. This I find rather interesting. Realize that I pointed out to everyone that mafia could work together to feed people analysis/reads. Yet you don't mention at all that it was me who first suggested this. Realize that my posting style is rather unique. I use capitalization, periods, and tend to be semi-formal at all times. I would definitely have to retype and revisit everything that people would tell me to say. It's possible that mafia guided me in the general reads that I should arrive at, but I definitely did the majority of the work myself. You conclude by arguing that I am scum because I want to lynch today. You realize that my vote is currently on no-lynch? Basically, you haven't presented any reasons why I am scum. You presented a ton of fluff, a ton of clear misinterpretations. You presented a few arguments on Onegu (maybe they have some validity, but I don't care). And you've claimed that I could do everything I have done as scum. But you haven't shown anything whatsoever that actually suggests that I am scum from my own play. To everyone else: I think that Tubesock is better than this. Look at the length of his post and compare it to the amount of substance. Contrast this with his earlier theory on TheBloodyDwarf. Tubesock here is feeling more lazy, and less interested, where Tubesock would be extremely motivated due to having caught the scum team and needing to make everyone else see his point. I wonder if Tubesock is mafia and making a token effort on a read he knows isn't true, and is less motivated because he knows that he is in trouble. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 22:53 GMT
#2154
I see it. I'm working on a post on Tubesock, because I need to go soon, and I'd like to get it out before I leave if possible (not sure I can, though). I'll take a look at your analysis after. One thing I notice is that for your survival, you kind of need to call prplhz and Tubesock both scum. I'm assuming Bourneq is the final scum? The Night 2 kill, again, that would have been Half the Sky regardless of whether or not her reads were good. I don't think the night kill itself implicates prplhz here (though it does suggest that it might be a good idea to borrow Half the Sky's read). I could certainly see the scum team being prplhz, Tubesock, and Bourneq. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 23:00 GMT
#2155
##unvote ##vote Tubesock I need to head out now. But I see a lot of suspicious progressions in his reads, and he hasn't been providing much original content (outside of his two big theories). More will follow when I get the chance. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 23:06 GMT
#2156
Bourneq is almost certainly scum here. He is mafia's easiest mislynch. And he's been largely ignored for quite some time. If Bourneq were town, mafia would almost certainly push him. That's more than enough for me. ##unvote ##vote Bourneq Bourneq is almost certainly mafia, Tubesock is probably mafia. One more between prplhz, rsoultin, and jarjarbinks. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 16 2015 23:07 GMT
#2157
On April 17 2015 08:06 Trfel wrote: To further explain, the only way that this wouldn't be the case is if mafia was bussing today (which I find unlikely), or if they felt it would be easier to get another mislynch instead. But I see no united push. By far the most likely scum here is Bourneq.Actually, I just realized. Bourneq is almost certainly scum here. He is mafia's easiest mislynch. And he's been largely ignored for quite some time. If Bourneq were town, mafia would almost certainly push him. That's more than enough for me. ##unvote ##vote Bourneq Bourneq is almost certainly mafia, Tubesock is probably mafia. One more between prplhz, rsoultin, and jarjarbinks. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 02:24 GMT
#2187
Fairly confident that Tubesock and Bourneq are both mafia. Given the way Tubesock has been acting these last few pages, I could lynch him over Bourneq. I know that Tubesock will talk about how scummy this is, but I really don't care. He's mafia. Still not much clue about the third mafia. But that's for another day. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 02:27 GMT
#2188
![]() Let's do that. I think that everyone in the thread is keeping up okay. Hello, Tubesock. How are you doing? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 02:32 GMT
#2192
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 02:49 GMT
#2201
On April 17 2015 11:47 prplhz wrote: Is it just me, or is prplhz claiming scum? Please explain?Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 11:45 rsoultin wrote: On April 17 2015 11:39 prplhz wrote: On April 17 2015 11:32 Trfel wrote: So, who do you guys want to lynch today? I see no need to leave it up to shenanigans. I should like to lynch rsoultin in the face and I believe I've made a multitude of statements expressing this sentiment. not happening, and if you're town you have to vote with town here anyway. pick someone else nope voting you. if you and four others are town then you need to put someone else to 4 votes before deadline. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 02:50 GMT
#2203
On April 17 2015 11:40 Tubesock wrote: Doing fairly well. What's it like being scum for the first time?Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 11:27 Trfel wrote: Actually hm, maybe I should argue with Tubesock. It would be fun ![]() Let's do that. I think that everyone in the thread is keeping up okay. Hello, Tubesock. How are you doing? I'm great you? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 02:54 GMT
#2206
On April 17 2015 11:52 Tubesock wrote: That would require me to be scum. I'm sorry, I'm just not as special as you.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 11:50 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 11:40 Tubesock wrote: Doing fairly well. What's it like being scum for the first time?On April 17 2015 11:27 Trfel wrote: Actually hm, maybe I should argue with Tubesock. It would be fun ![]() Let's do that. I think that everyone in the thread is keeping up okay. Hello, Tubesock. How are you doing? I'm great you? Fantastic, you going to bus Bourneq with me? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 03:05 GMT
#2210
On April 17 2015 11:56 Tubesock wrote: No need. Two scum down. You guys are obvious enough that I don't need to make a case.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 11:54 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 11:52 Tubesock wrote: That would require me to be scum. I'm sorry, I'm just not as special as you.On April 17 2015 11:50 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 11:40 Tubesock wrote: Doing fairly well. What's it like being scum for the first time?On April 17 2015 11:27 Trfel wrote: Actually hm, maybe I should argue with Tubesock. It would be fun ![]() Let's do that. I think that everyone in the thread is keeping up okay. Hello, Tubesock. How are you doing? I'm great you? Fantastic, you going to bus Bourneq with me? Nice try. You going to do any scumhunting yet? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 03:16 GMT
#2214
On April 17 2015 12:13 Tubesock wrote: What play am I supposedly making again? Remind me?Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 12:05 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 11:56 Tubesock wrote: No need. Two scum down. You guys are obvious enough that I don't need to make a case.On April 17 2015 11:54 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 11:52 Tubesock wrote: That would require me to be scum. I'm sorry, I'm just not as special as you.On April 17 2015 11:50 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 11:40 Tubesock wrote: Doing fairly well. What's it like being scum for the first time?On April 17 2015 11:27 Trfel wrote: Actually hm, maybe I should argue with Tubesock. It would be fun ![]() Let's do that. I think that everyone in the thread is keeping up okay. Hello, Tubesock. How are you doing? I'm great you? Fantastic, you going to bus Bourneq with me? Nice try. You going to do any scumhunting yet? Convincing. So, you pretty proud of the chaos you created today? You mad because I ruined your play? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 03:23 GMT
#2218
On April 17 2015 12:18 prplhz wrote: Would you prefer that I lynched you instead?like i'm not going to say i'm not slightly salty because you lynched both of my noob town reads over my noob scum read but i know that it's also on me. i'm not exactly good at arguing or explaining or drumming up support. And jarjarbinks, I'd greatly prefer to lynch Tubesock over prplhz here. I could see prplhz being town without too much effort, I have much more trouble seeing Tubesock as town. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 03:28 GMT
#2220
On April 17 2015 12:25 Tubesock wrote: Maybe because they are town, so they are interested in reading people correctly?Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 12:23 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 12:18 prplhz wrote: Would you prefer that I lynched you instead?like i'm not going to say i'm not slightly salty because you lynched both of my noob town reads over my noob scum read but i know that it's also on me. i'm not exactly good at arguing or explaining or drumming up support. And jarjarbinks, I'd greatly prefer to lynch Tubesock over prplhz here. I could see prplhz being town without too much effort, I have much more trouble seeing Tubesock as town. Funnyiest thing is you are acting like a polite Geript or Holyflare in my last games. You're pure OMGUS. I don't get why people town you. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 05:29 GMT
#2269
On April 17 2015 14:09 Tubesock wrote: Yes, I do think you would do this. I'm not terribly hard to pressure. And the argument of "he wouldn't go after a high profile player, he's town" has been used this game already. That doesn't work after the first time.So, you guys really think I would as a first time mafia go after Trfel here? Thank you, that's ballsy as fuck. Like I would need a wheelchair they're big. Why not Prplhz? He's scummy as either alignment. Seems dumb to go after the biggest caser here. I have the right to be lazy. I've caught a scum, almost guaranteed (Bourneq). There is literally no other pressure to lynch him here, which means that scum is not interested in him dying (which if Bourneq is town, would result in an easy victory). Any other lynch is prematurely advancing the schedule, taking a more risky lynch before it's necessary. But especially without any scum meta to compare to, I doubt much will change with regards to reading Tubesock. See you guys tomorrow, I'll be relaxing. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 05:32 GMT
#2270
On April 17 2015 14:13 Tubesock wrote: I like how you now insist that Breshke is town due to his claim, while you were suspicious of me for saying very similar things earlier.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 14:03 rsoultin wrote: On April 17 2015 14:00 Breshke wrote: On April 17 2015 13:50 rsoultin wrote: fine don't talk to me, don't reevaluate, just dick around, whatever. i hope you're scum here for more reasons than one, prp >< @bresh...what makes you more sure on Tube? i'm fine with either really lol >< Tube doesn't think he is a great player saying in some of his points he is a newbie whatever whatever and thats fair enough. I then dont see that reflected in him assessing trefel and myself which like no one agrees with and saying he is just trying to get all the worlds out there and then not assessing the other worlds. I cant see how this is town. Like with TBD he admitted himself that his theory was out there yet with his scumread on me he sounds more sure and not willing to consider other things. okay, yeah i can see this lol >< i thought it strange too that he talked about you, truffle and bourneq but isn't willing to consider something else...like he was pretty stubborn in carol, but he was certain on his hf read (which was actually right lol >< just most of his others weren't) but saying y'all may be town isn't demonstrating the same certainty at all I was right on 2 of that team in Carol. I was wrong on Sick and Lightningstrike. Here I'm right on Trfel and Bourneq most likely. Breshke I've already said he's town till he's CC'd. And no I am not setting up a claim. I also like how you say that Breshke is town until counterclaimed, while saying that it's scummy that I asked any potential power roles to counterclaim. I guess you like taking mafia as confirmed town? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 05:39 GMT
#2276
On April 17 2015 14:15 Tubesock wrote: Yes. I'm scum because I did something that looks towny.Why are you guys towning Trfel? For his massive synapsis posts? He MUST DO THAT! Don't town him because he makes big posts. None of you have asked anything about my case except for the 2 guys in it. Why? Tubesock, this simply isn't how to scumhunt. To scumhunt, you want to look for mafia motivation. However, this doesn't mean look for "why would they do this as mafia", it means to look for the reasons that mafia would do this that town wouldn't have. Me making my four analysis posts is something I would definitely do as town, and would probably do as scum. In and of itself, it's not alignment indicative. Read what I said, that's what is alignment indicative. Nothing that you have posted suggests that I am scum. You've only showed that you disagree with several of the reasons that I have been townread. The one real potentially scummy thing in my filter, my hammer on TheBloodyDwarf over prplhz, isn't a reason you are scumreading me. Apparently I killed Half the Sky because she was the biggest threat to me. So what? She was the biggest threat to most everyone. Just because Trfel would have killed Half the Sky here doesn't mean that any other mafia team would not. And it doesn't mean that I am scum. Even as scum, you need to keep these things in mind. You can do crazy things and hope to get townread anyway, and often it will work, but normally your support dries up. Eventually you need some actual reasons behind your pushes. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 05:41 GMT
#2277
On April 17 2015 14:34 Tubesock wrote: Oh, so now Bourneq is confirmed scum? But you want to lynch me anyway?Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 14:29 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:09 Tubesock wrote: Yes, I do think you would do this. I'm not terribly hard to pressure. And the argument of "he wouldn't go after a high profile player, he's town" has been used this game already. That doesn't work after the first time.So, you guys really think I would as a first time mafia go after Trfel here? Thank you, that's ballsy as fuck. Like I would need a wheelchair they're big. Why not Prplhz? He's scummy as either alignment. Seems dumb to go after the biggest caser here. I have the right to be lazy. I've caught a scum, almost guaranteed (Bourneq). There is literally no other pressure to lynch him here, which means that scum is not interested in him dying (which if Bourneq is town, would result in an easy victory). Any other lynch is prematurely advancing the schedule, taking a more risky lynch before it's necessary. But especially without any scum meta to compare to, I doubt much will change with regards to reading Tubesock. See you guys tomorrow, I'll be relaxing. Prplhz found him Day 1. You're just bussing. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 05:47 GMT
#2280
On April 17 2015 14:43 Tubesock wrote: The case on The Shining was about inconsistency between how much time he implied he was spending on the game and the quality of his reads that he implied versus the amount of time he actually spent playing the game and the actual quality of his reads. I won't go into it much now, obviously I was wrong.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 14:36 rsoultin wrote: eh honestly i don't see what's so scummy about the claim talks? like yeah i could see this world you have where breshke is scum with truffle and they just claim, encourage a cc, and both blues are outed but lol >< that world falls apart the moment you say breshke is scum like if truffle and breshke are scum they have to be scum for more than just that >< that's like paranoid fear, tube Possible. But the paranoid fear is what got me to recheck him. I didn't like all the Bluehunting centric talk while he pressured Stutters. His play made me realize I was making excuses for his play based on my earlier read. My biggest point is I think you guys are biased from your first reads. I don't think you are looking at the game objectively. I mean Prp and Stutters fight for a full cycle for doing the exact same thing. Both are town. Same thing here. Trfel got towned for doing big posts with nothing that anyone really talked about. He pushed the Shining lynch basically on the sale that he can't read pages 7 - 23 in 30 minutes. Those pages are nothing but one liners essentially. It's not hard to read it that fast. I think Trfel was scumming Shining and basically making it look like he was the standard of effort that should apply. Note that Breshke (confirmed town) scumread The Shining with me, and rsoultin (likely town) townread The Shining primarily due to a good blue read (which I missed, I'm a terrible blue hunter). | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 05:49 GMT
#2281
On April 17 2015 11:10 Tubesock wrote: Yeah, you definitely don't care who gets lynched. And me voting Bourneq is a joke.Has Trfel done anything town this Day 3? His sole "scumhunting" is in direct response to me scumming him. Otherwise he's trying to lead town to talk about claims and lynch's and whatever but when it comes to actual investigative work he comes up with excuses. And that swap off me to Bourneq is a joke. ##Unvote ##Vote: Trfel If you are actually town here, you need to take some more time between posts to make sure that what you're saying makes sense. Your posting is loaded with inconsistencies. You're either scum or not thinking things through fully before posting. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:00 GMT
#2290
First thing they ought to do is counterclaim. I think that scum ought to counterclaim at MYLO, at least once. I'm really surprised that they didn't, this either indicates that the scumteam is not very skilled or has an extremely weak thread presence, such that their chances of pulling it off were minimal (or the best counterclaimer was the roleblocker, and it wasn't deemed worth the risk). I can't assume that the scum team is really that incompetent, so I assume that they didn't have the thread presence to pull it off. Therefore, scum wants to probe as many places as possible, and try to see what sticks. If scum can cast doubt on one of the townread players, that is huge for their chances of winning. Town simply has to make sure that they don't get dragged down under the desperate scum attacks, and then make one or two good reads, and it's a win. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:07 GMT
#2294
On April 17 2015 14:54 Tubesock wrote: Onegu wasn't scummy? And I'm not getting townread for effort, I'm getting townread for tone, read progression/explanation, and the fact that my mafia game is a disgrace to the site. Both of my non-town games, rsoultin caught me in a handful of posts.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 14:39 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:15 Tubesock wrote: Yes. I'm scum because I did something that looks towny.Why are you guys towning Trfel? For his massive synapsis posts? He MUST DO THAT! Don't town him because he makes big posts. None of you have asked anything about my case except for the 2 guys in it. Why? Tubesock, this simply isn't how to scumhunt. To scumhunt, you want to look for mafia motivation. However, this doesn't mean look for "why would they do this as mafia", it means to look for the reasons that mafia would do this that town wouldn't have. Me making my four analysis posts is something I would definitely do as town, and would probably do as scum. In and of itself, it's not alignment indicative. Read what I said, that's what is alignment indicative. Nothing that you have posted suggests that I am scum. You've only showed that you disagree with several of the reasons that I have been townread. The one real potentially scummy thing in my filter, my hammer on TheBloodyDwarf over prplhz, isn't a reason you are scumreading me. Apparently I killed Half the Sky because she was the biggest threat to me. So what? She was the biggest threat to most everyone. Just because Trfel would have killed Half the Sky here doesn't mean that any other mafia team would not. And it doesn't mean that I am scum. Even as scum, you need to keep these things in mind. You can do crazy things and hope to get townread anyway, and often it will work, but normally your support dries up. Eventually you need some actual reasons behind your pushes. What's alignment indicative is things of what you do. You agree that your extra effort is something that you would do as either alignment. I'm trying to get town to see that they shouldn't town you for it. I also think you had to overcompensate for Onegu's scumminess. I don't think it is nearly as easy as "oh this post is alignment indicative." Or this one, it's too easy to fake. It's more about intentions of what they are doing. I don't want town to just pass you as town. I think that's a very dangerous mistake. So you've gone from "here's why Trfel is scum" to "don't townread Trfel for these reasons". Why? You're attacking me with defense, not offense. You have no actual attack. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:10 GMT
#2297
On April 17 2015 14:55 Tubesock wrote: So, I'm bussing Bourneq, but my vote on him is a joke and I won't stay on him?Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 14:49 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 11:10 Tubesock wrote: Yeah, you definitely don't care who gets lynched. And me voting Bourneq is a joke.Has Trfel done anything town this Day 3? His sole "scumhunting" is in direct response to me scumming him. Otherwise he's trying to lead town to talk about claims and lynch's and whatever but when it comes to actual investigative work he comes up with excuses. And that swap off me to Bourneq is a joke. ##Unvote ##Vote: Trfel If you are actually town here, you need to take some more time between posts to make sure that what you're saying makes sense. Your posting is loaded with inconsistencies. You're either scum or not thinking things through fully before posting. It's a joke because you vote me, then are like, bah Bourneq instead. I don't think you will stay on him at all. And remind me, if I'm scum trying to secure a mislynch at MYLO, why would I bother bussing for town credit? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:22 GMT
#2299
![]() It's probably for the best, though. It doesn't give town any information, and just gets in the way of real scumhunting. I'd really like to lynch Bourneq today. I could be willing to lynch Tubesock instead, but I just see no reason to do so. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:28 GMT
#2302
On April 17 2015 15:23 Tubesock wrote: Yeah, I thought that I could still look towny as scum. I couldn't even pull it off as third party in Aperture 4. Holyflare straight up humiliated me Night 1. Rsoultin identified that I was third party and forced it out of me at the very start of Night 1. I can't prove it, as these conversations occurred over PM, but I'm sure rsoultin can vouch for it.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 15:07 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:54 Tubesock wrote: Onegu wasn't scummy? And I'm not getting townread for effort, I'm getting townread for tone, read progression/explanation, and the fact that my mafia game is a disgrace to the site. Both of my non-town games, rsoultin caught me in a handful of posts.On April 17 2015 14:39 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:15 Tubesock wrote: Yes. I'm scum because I did something that looks towny.Why are you guys towning Trfel? For his massive synapsis posts? He MUST DO THAT! Don't town him because he makes big posts. None of you have asked anything about my case except for the 2 guys in it. Why? Tubesock, this simply isn't how to scumhunt. To scumhunt, you want to look for mafia motivation. However, this doesn't mean look for "why would they do this as mafia", it means to look for the reasons that mafia would do this that town wouldn't have. Me making my four analysis posts is something I would definitely do as town, and would probably do as scum. In and of itself, it's not alignment indicative. Read what I said, that's what is alignment indicative. Nothing that you have posted suggests that I am scum. You've only showed that you disagree with several of the reasons that I have been townread. The one real potentially scummy thing in my filter, my hammer on TheBloodyDwarf over prplhz, isn't a reason you are scumreading me. Apparently I killed Half the Sky because she was the biggest threat to me. So what? She was the biggest threat to most everyone. Just because Trfel would have killed Half the Sky here doesn't mean that any other mafia team would not. And it doesn't mean that I am scum. Even as scum, you need to keep these things in mind. You can do crazy things and hope to get townread anyway, and often it will work, but normally your support dries up. Eventually you need some actual reasons behind your pushes. What's alignment indicative is things of what you do. You agree that your extra effort is something that you would do as either alignment. I'm trying to get town to see that they shouldn't town you for it. I also think you had to overcompensate for Onegu's scumminess. I don't think it is nearly as easy as "oh this post is alignment indicative." Or this one, it's too easy to fake. It's more about intentions of what they are doing. I don't want town to just pass you as town. I think that's a very dangerous mistake. So you've gone from "here's why Trfel is scum" to "don't townread Trfel for these reasons". Why? You're attacking me with defense, not offense. You have no actual attack. You haven't even read my case then. I saw the game Rso caught you. You picked a bad game to try to change your meta. That wasn't because you are not capable of looking towny as mafia. How am I only defensing you. I've been repeating myself about how you haven't scumhunted in the first parts of Day 3. You only even noticed me because I came after you. You haven't been defending me, no. You misread what I said. What I mean is that, instead of sharing reasons why I am scum, you're sharing reasons why things that I could be considered town for are null (in your opinion). You're not sticking any scum on me, you're just trying to remove my townie points. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:33 GMT
#2303
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:38 GMT
#2306
On April 17 2015 15:35 Tubesock wrote: So now you accuse me of not reading the game. You have no good reason for this at all. Spending time thinking about the night kill before End of Night isn't a good reason. Wanting to no lynch at MYLO when I'm busy isn't a good reason.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 15:28 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 15:23 Tubesock wrote: Yeah, I thought that I could still look towny as scum. I couldn't even pull it off as third party in Aperture 4. Holyflare straight up humiliated me Night 1. Rsoultin identified that I was third party and forced it out of me at the very start of Night 1. I can't prove it, as these conversations occurred over PM, but I'm sure rsoultin can vouch for it.On April 17 2015 15:07 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:54 Tubesock wrote: Onegu wasn't scummy? And I'm not getting townread for effort, I'm getting townread for tone, read progression/explanation, and the fact that my mafia game is a disgrace to the site. Both of my non-town games, rsoultin caught me in a handful of posts.On April 17 2015 14:39 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:15 Tubesock wrote: Yes. I'm scum because I did something that looks towny.Why are you guys towning Trfel? For his massive synapsis posts? He MUST DO THAT! Don't town him because he makes big posts. None of you have asked anything about my case except for the 2 guys in it. Why? Tubesock, this simply isn't how to scumhunt. To scumhunt, you want to look for mafia motivation. However, this doesn't mean look for "why would they do this as mafia", it means to look for the reasons that mafia would do this that town wouldn't have. Me making my four analysis posts is something I would definitely do as town, and would probably do as scum. In and of itself, it's not alignment indicative. Read what I said, that's what is alignment indicative. Nothing that you have posted suggests that I am scum. You've only showed that you disagree with several of the reasons that I have been townread. The one real potentially scummy thing in my filter, my hammer on TheBloodyDwarf over prplhz, isn't a reason you are scumreading me. Apparently I killed Half the Sky because she was the biggest threat to me. So what? She was the biggest threat to most everyone. Just because Trfel would have killed Half the Sky here doesn't mean that any other mafia team would not. And it doesn't mean that I am scum. Even as scum, you need to keep these things in mind. You can do crazy things and hope to get townread anyway, and often it will work, but normally your support dries up. Eventually you need some actual reasons behind your pushes. What's alignment indicative is things of what you do. You agree that your extra effort is something that you would do as either alignment. I'm trying to get town to see that they shouldn't town you for it. I also think you had to overcompensate for Onegu's scumminess. I don't think it is nearly as easy as "oh this post is alignment indicative." Or this one, it's too easy to fake. It's more about intentions of what they are doing. I don't want town to just pass you as town. I think that's a very dangerous mistake. So you've gone from "here's why Trfel is scum" to "don't townread Trfel for these reasons". Why? You're attacking me with defense, not offense. You have no actual attack. You haven't even read my case then. I saw the game Rso caught you. You picked a bad game to try to change your meta. That wasn't because you are not capable of looking towny as mafia. How am I only defensing you. I've been repeating myself about how you haven't scumhunted in the first parts of Day 3. You only even noticed me because I came after you. You haven't been defending me, no. You misread what I said. What I mean is that, instead of sharing reasons why I am scum, you're sharing reasons why things that I could be considered town for are null (in your opinion). You're not sticking any scum on me, you're just trying to remove my townie points. I meant it the way you did. I'm telling town not to just townread you for your effort. So, yeah that removes defense and I'm saying you are scummy for your D3 actions. I don't see how me saying you came in and IMMEDIATELY knew things that I think should have taken some time to at least think about. I'm accusing you of not reading the game because you don't have to. You also go straight for the no lynch/lynch and claim business which I think is not scumhunting. That's scummy behavior not town. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:39 GMT
#2308
On April 17 2015 15:36 Tubesock wrote: But I'm having fun!Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 15:33 Trfel wrote: Your posts have become less frequent. Running to the scum QT for advice? Didn't know I should be spamming F5. I'm losing interest in you since everyone seemed to have left. I guess I probably shouldn't play with my food. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:40 GMT
#2309
On April 17 2015 15:39 Breshke wrote: Oh, sorry, if you actually want to have useful discussion with Tubesock, go ahead. I'll get out of your way.Im here tube but you seem more itnrested in arguing with trefel than expanding on your bourne read with me Let me know when you're done so I can start arguing again. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 06:49 GMT
#2313
On April 17 2015 15:45 Tubesock wrote: I don't need to consider that Breshke could be fake claiming.Show nested quote + On April 17 2015 15:38 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 15:35 Tubesock wrote: So now you accuse me of not reading the game. You have no good reason for this at all. Spending time thinking about the night kill before End of Night isn't a good reason. Wanting to no lynch at MYLO when I'm busy isn't a good reason.On April 17 2015 15:28 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 15:23 Tubesock wrote: Yeah, I thought that I could still look towny as scum. I couldn't even pull it off as third party in Aperture 4. Holyflare straight up humiliated me Night 1. Rsoultin identified that I was third party and forced it out of me at the very start of Night 1. I can't prove it, as these conversations occurred over PM, but I'm sure rsoultin can vouch for it.On April 17 2015 15:07 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:54 Tubesock wrote: Onegu wasn't scummy? And I'm not getting townread for effort, I'm getting townread for tone, read progression/explanation, and the fact that my mafia game is a disgrace to the site. Both of my non-town games, rsoultin caught me in a handful of posts.On April 17 2015 14:39 Trfel wrote: On April 17 2015 14:15 Tubesock wrote: Yes. I'm scum because I did something that looks towny.Why are you guys towning Trfel? For his massive synapsis posts? He MUST DO THAT! Don't town him because he makes big posts. None of you have asked anything about my case except for the 2 guys in it. Why? Tubesock, this simply isn't how to scumhunt. To scumhunt, you want to look for mafia motivation. However, this doesn't mean look for "why would they do this as mafia", it means to look for the reasons that mafia would do this that town wouldn't have. Me making my four analysis posts is something I would definitely do as town, and would probably do as scum. In and of itself, it's not alignment indicative. Read what I said, that's what is alignment indicative. Nothing that you have posted suggests that I am scum. You've only showed that you disagree with several of the reasons that I have been townread. The one real potentially scummy thing in my filter, my hammer on TheBloodyDwarf over prplhz, isn't a reason you are scumreading me. Apparently I killed Half the Sky because she was the biggest threat to me. So what? She was the biggest threat to most everyone. Just because Trfel would have killed Half the Sky here doesn't mean that any other mafia team would not. And it doesn't mean that I am scum. Even as scum, you need to keep these things in mind. You can do crazy things and hope to get townread anyway, and often it will work, but normally your support dries up. Eventually you need some actual reasons behind your pushes. What's alignment indicative is things of what you do. You agree that your extra effort is something that you would do as either alignment. I'm trying to get town to see that they shouldn't town you for it. I also think you had to overcompensate for Onegu's scumminess. I don't think it is nearly as easy as "oh this post is alignment indicative." Or this one, it's too easy to fake. It's more about intentions of what they are doing. I don't want town to just pass you as town. I think that's a very dangerous mistake. So you've gone from "here's why Trfel is scum" to "don't townread Trfel for these reasons". Why? You're attacking me with defense, not offense. You have no actual attack. You haven't even read my case then. I saw the game Rso caught you. You picked a bad game to try to change your meta. That wasn't because you are not capable of looking towny as mafia. How am I only defensing you. I've been repeating myself about how you haven't scumhunted in the first parts of Day 3. You only even noticed me because I came after you. You haven't been defending me, no. You misread what I said. What I mean is that, instead of sharing reasons why I am scum, you're sharing reasons why things that I could be considered town for are null (in your opinion). You're not sticking any scum on me, you're just trying to remove my townie points. I meant it the way you did. I'm telling town not to just townread you for your effort. So, yeah that removes defense and I'm saying you are scummy for your D3 actions. I don't see how me saying you came in and IMMEDIATELY knew things that I think should have taken some time to at least think about. I'm accusing you of not reading the game because you don't have to. You also go straight for the no lynch/lynch and claim business which I think is not scumhunting. That's scummy behavior not town. I've said the same thing over and over. This really boils down to I don't think you considered that Breshke could be fakeclaiming. I don't think you have been trying to read what I'm saying about non you subjects. I guess it makes sense, why would you I'm scumreading you. Then why would you read anything else I say about anything else really. We cannot possibly lynch a non counterclaimed blue. I basically don't care how scummy they look, they can't be lynched. So why would I consider the possibility of Breshke being counterclaimed before it happens? I paid minimal attention to your case on Breshke for the above reason. You've also said that rsoultin is town and prplhz is town. What else have you said that isn't about me? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 07:02 GMT
#2317
Good night. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 17:12 GMT
#2345
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 18:11 GMT
#2356
On April 18 2015 03:08 Bourneq wrote: It's already open for signups here.Whatever I say I am not getting out of this lynch. See you next newbie game. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:10 GMT
#2398
Why would scum not push Bourneq there?!?!!?!? Not even at all? Scum pushed basically everyone else, everyone but Bourneq. I'm so sorry, I just thought that there was no way Bourneq would be town when he was completely ignored like that. And I thought that that fact alone outweighed any analysis I could possibly do. Loss is on me, I stopped playing when I thought the lynch was guaranteed to work. Tubesock was obvious enough, and rsoultin and jarjarbinks were definitely on the table. There were good reasons to townread prplhz, and I could have made myself unlynchable once the next day started. We would have actually been in a good spot if I had just townread Bourneq. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:12 GMT
#2399
On April 18 2015 06:38 rsoultin wrote: What? You never make legacies (or only make bad ones) in games I play with you....Show nested quote + On April 18 2015 06:35 The Shining wrote: On April 18 2015 06:29 rsoultin wrote: pls pls pls don't scumread me in future games for being wrong though lol >< i do that all the time i'm not marv/hf lol >< hey plot! <3 i'm glad you and bourneq plan on playing again in the next newbie! Bah I had that as part of your town meta so idk. Now it's nai for you =P Yeah I'm happy you guys are playing again. Next newbie seems to be filling up fast. o.0 what's part of my town meta? lol generally any meta argument for me is bad lol >< it's why i go GRRRR at people trying tone you can catch me on lol and forgetting to post legacies that too >> nice one bresh...had to really dig through my games to find examples where i didn't do it as town lol >< Ugh, I guess there goes my strategy of not reading you and hoping you get night killed first. Anyway, I figured Tubesock was the godfather. Anyway, I'm sorry for replacing in. I had the time to catch up on the thread, I didn't have the time to truly play the game at a high level after catching up. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:19 GMT
#2400
Ugh. I guess you learn as you go. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:34 GMT
#2406
If I just didn't block town from playing the game normally, we would have been okay. I thought we were set, and I could afford to sidetrack the entire thread by arguing with mafia. I was so, so wrong. Tubesock, just a warning, if you're going to try and lynch me, you really need to do a better job. And next time I won't let you interfere with the entire thread, I'll actually use my head once in a while. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:40 GMT
#2408
On April 18 2015 07:37 The Shining wrote: Nah. It was easy to see that something was wrong with rsoultin. You didn't even need to read her filter.Show nested quote + On April 18 2015 07:29 rsoultin wrote: o.0 you actually thought i'm only wrong as town? lol that would make it hard to get anyone mislynched -amused- No lol just that you being wrong and the way you defend those wrong reads after was town. Thought scum rso would be more guilty and therefore less coherently defensive of her reads. Lesson learned. Read rso thru current game only. And if alive D3, auto lynch. ![]() The disconnect is differentiating between her play being "off" and this being alignment indicative. That would be hard to figure out. Honestly, were it not for the Bourneq thing, there's a pretty chance I would have gone with rsoultin being scum. Jarjarbinks was most likely to stop me. I just feel so awful. I made a terrible assumption, and not only did I use it to sabotage my own play, but I sabotaged the entire town. You can't win mafia single-handedly, but you certainly can lose it that way. Apologies to Bourneq, your play wasn't bad at all, my reason for scumreading you was simply moronic. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:52 GMT
#2416
On April 18 2015 07:50 Half the Sky wrote: Wait, what, YOU had a coaching QT? What?!?!!!?Show nested quote + On April 18 2015 07:47 Damdred wrote: Just want to say new. People use your coaches more IDK how the others were but one of my qts had 3 posts. It made me sad but meh, good job Scum I had job and tube as Scum though My coaching QT was about ~170 posts when I got NKed. It didn't help me because I'm one of the worst town players in TL. xD Seriously newbies. the coaches are there to help you. Ask questions and link posts and actively read the thread. We had a good set of coaches too. If you are pressed for time, find ways to manage your priorities in thread. Focus on the scummiest players or a smaller group of players. I really should have asked for one, then...... | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:56 GMT
#2422
On April 18 2015 07:52 Half the Sky wrote: I never bothered pushing Tubesock.Trfel, Tube honestly bled scum D3. I was losing the plot in scum qt, I'm glad you caught on to it and Breshke to an extent it was a damn shame the rest couldn't. Also town had terrible RNG, nerfed setup (no DT, christ we needed a DT this game) and Holyflare subbing in at night instead of start D2. Bad luck there. Ras-pew-tin would have been DOA there. I argued with him for the sake of arguing with him. Not to implicate him as scum. I did it because I knew I could actually prove he was scum at any time, and because I thought we had the lynch sealed up in Bourneq. What a terrible decision. The blame isn't on town for not seeing that Tubesock is scum. The blame is on me for making Tubesock a nightmare to read, and the thread impossible to follow. And for not bothering to explain why Tubesock was scum. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:56 GMT
#2424
On April 18 2015 07:53 Half the Sky wrote: Protoss! XDTrfel, any veteran can request a coach. You have to just ask. Newbies get first priority obviously. If you RNG scum you are obviously given the scum coach. Artanis was my coach. Much <3 to the protoss. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 22:57 GMT
#2428
On April 18 2015 07:56 Holyflare wrote: If I had to wait until the end of Day 2 to get a start on the game, I would never have had a chance to get caught up......don't replace till end of cycles next time plz ty <3 | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 23:01 GMT
#2432
On April 18 2015 08:00 prplhz wrote: I kind of flamed Tubesock pretty badly....Show nested quote + On April 18 2015 07:55 Half the Sky wrote: prplhz, I'm also sorry for going batshit insane on you. didn't even notice that so lol np people were really nice this game. like no flaming or "YOU'RE THE WORST PERSON AND/OR PLAYER ON THIS INTERNET" or anything. Tubesock, I'm sorry. I won't do it ever again. Promise. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 23:05 GMT
#2439
On April 18 2015 08:03 Half the Sky wrote: Starcraft is amazing!Show nested quote + On April 18 2015 07:56 Trfel wrote: On April 18 2015 07:53 Half the Sky wrote: Protoss! XDTrfel, any veteran can request a coach. You have to just ask. Newbies get first priority obviously. If you RNG scum you are obviously given the scum coach. Artanis was my coach. Much <3 to the protoss. Yeh...he hasn't taken too well to me being a dota player. He is trying to corrupt me into the Starcraft/BW sort of thing....no, I'll take dota over that shit anyday. Team games are no fun because I always blame my losses on my teammates and that just makes me mad. Ironic that I play mafia, isn't it ![]() | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 23:09 GMT
#2445
On April 18 2015 08:08 Half the Sky wrote: Oh, I heard of this new game. I think I'll install it?I am policy voting any League player in my next game. You heard it here first. ![]() League of Legends? | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 23:16 GMT
#2450
On April 18 2015 08:14 LoneMeow wrote: Let's be honest, that push was never going anywhere.Show nested quote + On April 18 2015 08:09 Half the Sky wrote: On April 18 2015 08:04 rsoultin wrote: lol it wasn't to get even hts you actually were the unlynchable townie after day 2...it was very obvious you were town and you were considering everything, whereas players like stutters/prp/bresh were just tunneled you were the biggest threat ![]() Ehhhhhhhhh......I was pretty focused on prplhz....eh I dunno. I guess that gives me some confidence in my townplay? Scum tried to push a mislynch on you and failed. That in itself should give you all the confidence you need. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 23:30 GMT
#2454
On April 18 2015 08:29 rsoultin wrote: And your reads aren't good enough so that I could scumread you for making a bad push. I hope you feel good about yourself.Show nested quote + On April 18 2015 08:14 LoneMeow wrote: On April 18 2015 08:09 Half the Sky wrote: On April 18 2015 08:04 rsoultin wrote: lol it wasn't to get even hts you actually were the unlynchable townie after day 2...it was very obvious you were town and you were considering everything, whereas players like stutters/prp/bresh were just tunneled you were the biggest threat ![]() Ehhhhhhhhh......I was pretty focused on prplhz....eh I dunno. I guess that gives me some confidence in my townplay? Scum tried to push a mislynch on you and failed. That in itself should give you all the confidence you need. lol >> not to be argumentative but i never really expected that to fly xP i just needed something to make me look invested -swt- | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 17 2015 23:52 GMT
#2461
I'm sorry for arguing like that with you. It was not called for. My apologies, you didn't deserve it in the slightest. Until those pushes on Breshke and me, you were playing a very good scum game. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
April 18 2015 00:01 GMT
#2465
On April 18 2015 08:59 Breshke wrote: The vigilante claim was questionable.Srry for that vet claim play. I cant say enough how in retrospect idk how i thought it would work. The vet claim had to happen there. You weren't going to get shot, and you were under reasonably heavy suspicion. That was a good choice, I think. | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 EWC_Arena25725 StarCraft: Brood WarJimRising ![]() ![]() Hui .780 Fuzer ![]() ![]() Rex ![]() Reynor ![]() UpATreeSC ![]() SpeCial ![]() BRAT_OK ![]() ![]() Bisu Dota 2![]() Shuttle ![]() Larva ![]() Mini ![]() actioN ![]() EffOrt ![]() Soma ![]() ggaemo ![]() Rush ![]() TY ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
CranKy Ducklings
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
CSO Cup
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Online Event
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
[ Show More ] The PondCast
Replay Cast
|
|