EPTGlory Seeker Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
 | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
does this setup follow your other ones whereby if there's an x role it's setup a or b etc? Or is it just any number of anything? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 06:41 Cavalinho wrote: Probably being mafia and lurking. I bet we should vote him and not me. aren't you always "mafia"? :p | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 06:49 Koshi wrote: No I think that is you. Are you going to play your towniest this game? neverrrrrrrrr! lets lynch cava | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 06:53 Cavalinho wrote: Hey, how about we sit down and all talk about our feelings. I'm feeling pretty damn horny today, what about you? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
18/f/cali u? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 07:24 Cavalinho wrote: 40/m/nd Let's cyber. i'm wearing some nice black lace lingerie: http://www.annsummers.com/p/rhea-black-babydoll/01stblas1041006 kinda like this wht u wearin bby? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
HOTTTTTTTTTTTT is it one of those vibrating ones  xxxx | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 07:52 Vivax wrote: Yea I'm going to bed. Time to wait for Oats and the other two dudes to post. GOOD TALK BRO | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 09:00 Steveling wrote: Btw I read my pm title as Glory Hole(instead of role), I was like, wtf this mafia is gonna be kinky. it's as kinky as you want it to be baby xxxxxxxx | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 10:07 Blazinghand wrote: No ASOIAF post-book-3 spoilers plz the dragons die | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 10:08 Steveling wrote: I have read the books, I know everything. Not scum though. xD You are Varys btw thrawn. sick burn thrawn, you gonna take that? he said you got no balls | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
 | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 10:12 thrawn2112 wrote: ok. steveling has read the books. so that makes his suggestion non alignment indicative fuck you man this is definitely an oberyn spoiler | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 10:13 thrawn2112 wrote: hf game started a long time ago man. idk what you are reading game (of thrones) bro not THE game | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
2) Holyflare 3) Cavalinho 4) mderg 5) Koshi 6) Tehpoofter 7) Oatsmaster 8) Steveling 9) Vivax Did it for you <3 | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Take the name vivax. When you put each letter to it's corresponding number (A=1 etc) for Vivax's name you get 22922124. When I put 22922124 into google, the first result I get is a Seat Heater Pad for GM (http://www.newgmparts.com/oe-gm/22922124). Who is GM on the site of mafia? GMARSHAL!!!!!!! What does he take charge of? The banlist! Who gets banned? Bad people. In a game of mafia, who are the bad people? THE MAFIA. Remember how this all links back to GMarshal? Some could even say he was "The Godfather" of the banlist. What does Vivax say in his first post? On May 05 2014 07:24 Vivax wrote: Are you the godfather Steve? Vivax is mafia with Steve. His name is complete proof of it and he played the ballsy move of revealing his scum team for later plays. ##Vote Vivax | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 10:33 Steveling wrote: I'm playing pudge atm, anyone wanna join next? LOOK AT THIS. He's already given up playing this game because he has been outed. Classic scum. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
http://chomikuj.pl/katix5898/M*c5*82odzie*c5*bcowe/The.Cheetah.Girls.3.2008.DVDRip.XviD-VoMiT,2081812314.avi(video) What do Disney make? Feel good family films. Who likes to make people feel good? Friendly people! Who are these friendly peoples? TOWN. Thrawn is town. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Steveling - Steve for short = 19205225 FIRST FUCKING LINK IN GOOGLE?????? http://www.rockauto.com/dbphp/x,catalog,302,partnum,19205225,d,ACDELCO_19205225.html What is this link to??? ACDELCO Part # 19205225 GM Original Equipment /thread GG | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 10:38 Tehpoofter wrote: How long does it take mafia to write a concession speech? #wrekt HF you get vivax I'll get Steve because the more ballsy mafia should live longer. ##vote:Steveling you need to Bote: Vivax in the boting thread | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 10:46 Tehpoofter wrote: There is a boting thread? Wow. ##Bote:: Steveling you spelt Vivax wrong bro | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 21:06 Vivax wrote: He said he didn't want to vote me to not put me at L-2. 1. It's serious, 2. It provides a serious justification for a non-serious phase, 3. The reason is totally evasive and doesn't say anything about his opinion on me. It reads like an excuse. That's why I wanna know more about this post. you are dumb | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 20:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Holyflare playing like shit and way over blowing the non-serious attitude. In all his town games he gets down to business fast and even when he jokes around it isnt to this extent. Cal might be scum for being overdefensive yeah or stevling for being seriously on vivax for no reason. plz let me know the extent of my town games where this has happened because in all honestly this is a complete lie | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
and the reason is because you took a NON-SERIOUS post and tried to twist it to become something serious! Not putting you at L-2 is not a serious justification in the slightest it's a "oh i'm joking around but don't want to make it too risky for the jokes" explanation. How do you read this as serious explanation? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 22:50 Oatsmaster wrote: actually i have no idea how holyflare opens as town. The feeling i get is that he is trying way way way too hard to be funny LOOOOOOL | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 22:50 Oatsmaster wrote: actually i have no idea how holyflare opens as town. The feeling i get is that he is trying way way way too hard to be funny So let me get this straight. You made it out to be my town meta that I get "straight down to business" (even though this isn't the case). You then STICK to this by saying what I was doing ISN'T my town meta. THEN you say you have no idea how I open as town and actually it's just a "trying too hard to be funny"? My question is, why didn't you just say that in the first place? Why did you feel the need to portray this as my non-town meta when you actually had a reason in the first place? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 20:56 Koshi wrote: I don't see why it is scummy. I don't understand how everybody takes everything serious what Cav did and tries to spin it into something scummy. On May 05 2014 21:11 Koshi wrote: that actually sounds smart. koshi if that's the reason vivax came up with for disliking cav's reply and you liked his response then what did you LIKE about it in the first place to write this? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 00:19 Oatsmaster wrote: I literally said that meta shit because it sounded nice and convincing and had a decent chance of being correct. how can you NOT understand the point i'm raising if you are town WHY WOULD YOU NEED TO CONVINCE ANYONE OF ANYTHING IF YOU DO NOT KNOW IT'S CORRECT ##unbote ##Bote: Oatsmaster | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 00:19 Oatsmaster wrote: Do you know how to play this game Holyflare? Half of the battle comes when town decides that their ego is too large to sheep people without so called "good cases" So what, you make up points to try and get someone lynched when you don't know whether the points are actually accurate or not? Is that what you are seriously sticking to? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
much afk many boredom | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 00:33 Oatsmaster wrote: because town needs it to be convinced, I dont. This is simple. You are blowing it up into a huge affair because you got caught. caught at what..........? There's numerous games where I troll for almost the entirety of day 1 yet you tried to twist my actions at a time where EVERYONE was trolling into something that didn't exist in order to push a lynch on a player, "town needs to be convinced" is the worst thing i've ever heard. You literally just admit to lying to push a lynch on someone. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 00:41 Oatsmaster wrote: I think you are scum for overacting and then this overreaction to something that I do practically every game anyway and I never do as scum. On May 06 2014 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote: The meta thing does not play a part at all. Nothing. Stop referring to it because its chainsaw defending. So why is it that I can't use meta to prove that what you are saying is utter BS but you CAN use meta about yourself to say that you are right? Is this real life or are you just squirming? On May 06 2014 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote: The meta thing does not play a part at all. Nothing. Stop referring to it because its chainsaw defending. On May 06 2014 00:40 Oatsmaster wrote: Im really confused here, in what world does scumOats obviously lie about something completely factcheckable and then not give a shit? Oh right, no world. Your meta doesnt show shit Holyflare. In what world does town oats lie about something so obviously fact checkable to try and get someone lynched when the game hasn't even started? + Show Spoiler + For anyone that wants to listen to his nonsense and is unconvinced about lynching this mofo yet: Catastrophe Mafia (Themed) - Didn't do anything ALL of day 1 (oats was in this game), trolled majority of it. Cell mini mafia trolled almost all game Titanic 3 Made a fake case on DP to start discussion/get the ball rolling/troll (oats was also in this game!!!) Vengeful Mafia Did the same thing as titanic 3 Really small mafia - scooby doo all game You have been in a lot of my games where I've opened with trolling! THAT is why there is an "overreaction" (hint: there's not), you LIED about my meta and it's something you should know about seeing as you were in a lot of those games to get me LYNCHED in an instant majority game but then when I point that out and you have to backtrack and suddenly me pointing out your lie is an overreaction???????? You are scum. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
1) Oats lies about my meta 2) I jump all over oats for this 3) Oats claims me jumping all over him for lying is an overreaction 4) I prove that what he did is a lie with meta 5) Oats says meta is useless -> says he's right because of meta -> says i'm scum for wanting to lynch a confirmed liar 6) Lynch oats 7) Profit. £££$$$$ | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
This is the towniest post in the thread. By far. In all seriousness: On May 05 2014 12:08 Cavalinho wrote: At first glace, I figured this was setup like Mafiascum, where when someone hits majority they get lynched. I didn't want to put Vivax at L-2 because we were goofing off. I'm still not entirely sure if that's how it works, but that's my best guess. This. This is incredibly towny and it's so so so so sooooooo odd that Vivax mentioned it was scummy. Why would scum be CONCERNED about someone going to L-2???? It shows that while he was having fun he was also thinking about the consequences the fun could have on the actual game. In fact the post vivax made: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/449650-glory-seeker-mini-mafia?page=11#210 Reminded me of this post from titanic 3: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/445107-iii-titanic-mini-mafia-ms-paint-edition?page=47#924 Where he compared peoples "shifts in trolling to not trolling" (he was mafia). He takes Cavalinho's post totally out of context and adds on so many fluffy things "why didn't he mention anything about me", even though it's quite clearly explained in the post. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I want him to answer this first before I go to any conclusions but it was a super odd response after just berating people for calling cav suspicious: On May 06 2014 00:18 Holyflare wrote: koshi if that's the reason vivax came up with for disliking cav's reply and you liked his response then what did you LIKE about it in the first place to write this? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 01:23 Oatsmaster wrote: It feels so fake holyflare. Is cav's stuff really the only thing you noticed? rofl | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 01:37 mderg wrote: I´m still here, I don´t have anything to add right now. On May 06 2014 00:26 mderg wrote: I don´t understand your play right now, Oatsmaster. Why would you state something as fact, if you have no idea about it? You stated this previously and then just sat back but me and oats have been talking for a while. Have you not gained anything else from that conversation that makes you lean in any direction? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 02:32 Vivax wrote: I think it's this defense that rubs me the wrong way. "Why would scum do x" as a basis of a townread is stupid. Scum would do x you don't expect them to do in order to look more townie (for example me hard defending Cav last game even though I didn't have to). Good ol' WIFOM. Overall I feel like HF is picking sides way too strongly, and looks too confident with this and his push on Oats. But I'll observe further. So what you're saying here is that scum do things that make them look towny all the time......? So you're saying that what he did makes him try to "appear" towny!? That is so backwards. I see it like this -> we're pissing around I make some joke thing on you and me and thrawn joke vote you. Then I do the same thing with steveling, if we all went on you then that would be L-1 (big risk for obvious joke) poofter goes on steve to avoid this, cav does the same to avoid being at l-2. You return and point out that he hasn't talked about you and that he voted steve without saying anything!?!?!? and you rationalise it by saying he went all serious mode for no reason...? That's what I don't understand and subsequently WHY koshi's response is so unfathomably strange and I want to know what he liked about cav's post before you said anything | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 03:53 Cavalinho wrote: Yeah, I'm bored. You wanna make out? ![[image loading]](http://www.galatview.com/english/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/KISS1.jpg) | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2014 19:23 Koshi wrote: So what do you make of Steve blowing up at Cav? You agree that Cav was just joking with that vote on Steve? You agree Cav was joking when he said he would lurk? On May 05 2014 20:56 Koshi wrote: I don't see why it is scummy. I don't understand how everybody takes everything serious what Cav did and tries to spin it into something scummy. On May 06 2014 04:22 Koshi wrote: What Vivax says is that cav gave serious reasoning for a trow away vote that was at the same time evasive. I agree with that when I read it. I was pressuring steveling about his push on cav because it didnt make any sense and steve refuses to explain it. Explain to me why cav is scum because he said he was going to lurk and then makes the next post after that. Also explain to me why Vivax gives Oats townread for lying. Joke vote on steve -> not scummy -> vivax posts reasons that don't make sense if you think that it was a joke vote -> you say you agree with vivax explain to me how that makes any sense whatsoever? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
yes the problem with your reasoning........ -.- | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
poofter, clarify this for us plz | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Also explain to me why Vivax gives Oats townread for lying. I don't see where he did that? Although I don't like him coming in at random times, spouting useless crap and ignoring the main issues. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Regarding HF a lot is cause of the reasons he's pushing Oats with. Oats sometimes gets misunderstood or misreads or doesn't make something incredibly clear, so pointing out inconsistencies and calling his mistakes or wrong representations lies, as in scummy lies shouldn't be applied while it could be applied to a player who doesn't make such mistakes as town often. With Oats you have to is look at his attitude. He's really passive as mafia and in your face as town as I think that is the case in this game. I know it's very subjective (I think LXI and Doctor Who 1 he was scum and I played with him) but maybe somebody else can confirm (Koshi and thrawn maybe can) but I feel confident to say he shouldn't be lynched today. You mafia vivax? Biggest load of bs contained in 2 paragraphs I've ever read. You're throwing around words like "misunderstood" or "misreads" instead of lying to get a towny lynched by any means possible. wrong representations lies, as in scummy lies shouldn't be applied while it could be applied to a player who doesn't make such mistakes as town often. On May 06 2014 00:19 Oatsmaster wrote: I literally said that meta shit because it sounded nice and convincing and had a decent chance of being correct. because town needs it to be convinced, I dont. This is simple. On May 06 2014 00:34 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont see what accuracy has to do with anything. Fact is, what convinces me is not what convinces other people and if I have to lie my ass off to get other people to listen, I dont see anything wrong with that. How can you possible defend oats saying he misread or misinterpreted when he said that he lied himself when he got caught out and then instead of you know, playing the game he just said how i am so mafia and wasn't doing anything instead of you know.... playing the rest of the game? His "in your face" town style is also wrong meta because in catastrophe he was exactly the same and was mafia. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 03 2014 11:55 Oatsmaster wrote: I really really dont like that Balla decides to propose a random lynch without mentioning any of the stuff that happened so far, and he never even explained why he wanted to random lynch. Feels a lot like he wants to be intentionally random and posted without having anything to say, indicative of a mafia mindset. yay sandro is actually playing the game \o/ On April 03 2014 11:58 Oatsmaster wrote: Also robik rage voting dandel and then voting for iamp unexplained also feels bad, not noob bad but scum bad. Like hes faking the rage against dandel right so he votes for him, then he feels like maybe he can get more support for an iamp lynch and is just testing the waters with his vote. Townies always have a reason for voting someone and its so early in the game it cant really be a trap or anything. Robik you gotta explain yourself. These (^^^) are his first 2 posts from catastrophe, compare them to the first posts here: On May 05 2014 20:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Holyflare playing like shit and way over blowing the non-serious attitude. In all his town games he gets down to business fast and even when he jokes around it isnt to this extent. Cal might be scum for being overdefensive yeah or stevling for being seriously on vivax for no reason. On May 05 2014 20:23 Oatsmaster wrote: I think koshi is faking his nonchalant town play. Feels extremely fake. Thrawn too chill to be scum. It's like, identical styles. In the top we see mafia Oatsmaster. In the bottom we see mafia Oatsmaster. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 06:58 thrawn2112 wrote: +1 to the stuff vivax is saying about oats want to explain this already disproved nonsense? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
xxx | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
If you're town and look at the posts I made about Cava, think for a moment how you would see them and suggest how you would react if you were in the place of Cava (who never showed a sign of wanting to vote for me). Would you instacall me scum and say i'm twisting or try to make clear it was a full joke post and that you think it's actually townie? This is also factually incorrect, he never calls you scum at all: On May 06 2014 02:38 Cavalinho wrote: Why does anyone have to like anything about my post in the first place? It was a post I made when everyone was goofing off, and then all of a sudden I start watching out for L-2 botes and I'm the most suspicious guy in the thread? Wtf? How is that even a logical conclusion to jump to at all? I do want to hear more from Koshi I guess, but Vivax is super suspicious to me right now. Steveling is doing silly shit too, but is pushing a possible inconsistency. I can see his line of thinking making sense, albeit being incorrect. Vivax is twisting shit. Why would I bother mentioning you at all in a joke post? Why would I willingly just put you at L-2 for no reason whatsoever, off of yet another joke post? Furthermore, why would I need to justify myself when the case on you is obviously fake? What are you trying to pull? He calls you out on legitimate queries. It's a joke post, everyone saw it as a joke post and he explained his reasoning for the joke post and then you treated it like a real post, which IS weird (like I already said). So really vivax your post says nothing and you're not even representing what is happening in the game properly, not to mention the meta that doesn't align with oats. What gives? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 07:32 Cavalinho wrote: I think a combination of tone and a logical leap (asking more about a post that others have found relatively towny because I didn't include you in it) made me think less of you at the time. The only thing I really don't like about this post is that I feel like you're martyring yourself by saying "wtf Cav thinks I'm scummy how dare he." I still don't understand why you would expect me to give a read of you based off of nothing. I don't feel like any of my reads are relatively strong with the exception of HF, and even then I wouldn't put money on what I currently think of him. If I even had to give anyone a read on you right now...I'd say it's rather null for the moment. I don't think "suspicious" warrants the same response as "I'm going to vote you and push you until you die." There's a clear difference between the two, and I feel like this post was made, in part, to make me look bad. Maybe I'm overreacting, maybe I'm not. I don't really know what to think of you yet. I think you're null...For the moment. Presumably you've read the thread. What do you think of that post now that I've already disproved it all as nonsense and misrepresenting things happening in the thread? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 07:40 Koshi wrote: Time to sleep. Poofter fill in 8 names: towniest town that towned: Leaning town: Leaning scum: Scummiest scummer that scummed: why just poofter? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 07:47 Cavalinho wrote: I think it's a very manipulative post. The whole thing plays out like a way of making me look bad without actually outright saying anything against me. It smells like the equivalent of putting your hand up away from someone and then pointing a finger at them behind it. I'm beginning to think Vivax is scummy. I want to see him post more though, I don't want to get sucked into a one-way train of thought. Ok well, how about this: What reason does a towny have to post a manipulative post such as that? What reason does scum have to post a manipulative post such as that? I think if you talk it through it will be quite evident what you are already thinking in the back of your mind. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Have fun. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 08:42 Steveling wrote: Anyone here? Have your thoughts updated since last time you were around? You've only really talked about cav for posts in a time of joking and koshi. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 08:54 Steveling wrote: HF I don't agree with you on the cav-vivax situation. You said the following is bs How so? This is perfectly logical. We are having a fun time making up bs. Cavalinho is concerned fun could end up bad if he puts vivax close to lynch. It's not serious, it's not evasive in any way shape or form. Why should cava have a read on vivax when vivax posted nothing? There was no scum reads no anything, just jokes. So why did vivax take it as a serious post, why is it evasive and why should cava have a read on 0 posts? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 08:57 Oatsmaster wrote: booom boom boom. Mderg is scum too ok for sure. Vivax was metaing me and all that so Im meh. I dont think Im playing too different from my scum games though. Although he isnt saying that I wasnt lying, hes saying that I didnt explain myself in a 'townie' way. Im just baffled at the amount of nonsense you say to the thread apparently believing in it. lying to lynch someone is fine. I wouldnt lie as scum though, too easy to get caught out. He quite categorically says you aren't a liar. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
how can anyone else call him out if nobody else is around to do it? Don't you think the fact nobody else called him out for it makes it more likely a scummy play than a towny play because he could have gotten away with it unnoticed. I'm also going to drop some knowledge bombs on you, mafia does whatever it takes to get someone lynched, they aren't interested in the truth they don't tend to ask questions they just push and push and push. Where in oats filter does it highlight that he might be wrong about me? Absolutely nowhere. It's that conviction with no questioning and no care about anything else that makes him mafia. If you're taking your past experiences as mafia into account then you should absolutely take my past experiences when I say that I have pushed lies and said the exact same logic as oats to appear more towny for doing it numerous times. Here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/434275-tl-mafia-lxiii-time-to-die?user=Holyflare&view=all On December 08 2013 13:38 Holyflare wrote: I dunno, a lot of people in this game seemed to pick up on "scum tells" that aren't real scum tells. Like misrepresenting someone isn't a tell, it's just being forgetful or misunderstanding sometimes. It's one thing to lie but to lie about something so obviously fact checkable is a thing i don't think scums would ever do. I was scum. Enjoy your free win and lynch oats now. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:21 Steveling wrote: That's 100% incorrect. How would he go unnoticed since you are in the game? A situation like you described for example, would be my post earlier about gumshoe, gumshoe is not here so I may be lying and get away with it. But how on earth would Oats get away with it with you here? That is in fact correct, and why at first I was apprehensive about it: + Show Spoiler [read this] + On May 05 2014 22:18 Holyflare wrote: and oats can you explain this to me? plz let me know the extent of my town games where this has happened because in all honestly this is a complete lie On May 05 2014 23:07 Holyflare wrote: So let me get this straight. You made it out to be my town meta that I get "straight down to business" (even though this isn't the case). You then STICK to this by saying what I was doing ISN'T my town meta. THEN you say you have no idea how I open as town and actually it's just a "trying too hard to be funny"? My question is, why didn't you just say that in the first place? Why did you feel the need to portray this as my non-town meta when you actually had a reason in the first place? On May 05 2014 23:45 Holyflare wrote: Not paying attention to what? I'm asking why you even mentioned my meta in the first place if you had literally no idea about my meta at all. You've answered now "because it sounded nice"........................... wtf does that even mean, that's the scummiest shit i've ever heard, why would you need to make your argument sound nice if you're just trying to point out information you think is right (all my meta is in my profile too) On May 06 2014 00:20 Holyflare wrote: how can you NOT understand the point i'm raising if you are town WHY WOULD YOU NEED TO CONVINCE ANYONE OF ANYTHING IF YOU DO NOT KNOW IT'S CORRECT ##unbote ##Bote: Oatsmaster but like I said, I'm also going to drop some knowledge bombs on you, mafia does whatever it takes to get someone lynched, they aren't interested in the truth they don't tend to ask questions they just push and push and push. Where in oats filter does it highlight that he might be wrong about me? Absolutely nowhere. It's that conviction with no questioning and no care about anything else that makes him mafia. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:32 Steveling wrote: Well it's funny you saying this because you are the one who voted for him right after he jumped on you. You are the one pushing more, oats haven't voted yet. On May 05 2014 15:48 Oatsmaster wrote: What the fuck holyflare. ##vote holyflare why even sign up if you arent going to bother it's his second post of the game | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:34 Steveling wrote: You know guys, there's a chance both of you are town and scum is laughing in their qt atm. Can you back up and look at other people? I hope you are joking because this implies you haven't read anything I've actually written at all. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:35 Steveling wrote: LOL this is a complete twist and turn, you know the reasons he did this and that it was a joke vote. LOL You are trying to make it seem like he voted for you after your debate, LOLOLOL. No I'm not? This wasn't during the "joking" time at all. I just assumed his vote was on me at this point and couldn't re-vote me because why else would you write ##vote unless you were voting someone? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:34 Oatsmaster wrote: Im criticizing you because its been an ongoing recurrence out of game where you are horrible. Im guessing its not the case this game though. please explain this? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:41 Steveling wrote: Well in this "majority vote" setup, I think people who don't offer opinions on everyone should be lynched. People who fixate on a couple persons, people who seem to have difficulty providing reads, people who lurk, they should all be lynched or shot. Mderg and Koshi fit this profile perfectly atm. why not poofter, even vivax? they are all lurker category | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:49 Oatsmaster wrote: No, thats why im not attacking your play, but rather you. Anyway, how do you say that scum dont probe and push but just straightout accuse people when you have done it as town before, namely dp in that game before this. the only person I've ever been "horrible" to is DP so I assume you mean that and which game before this? Titanic? or the one on OMGUS? Titanic I started out as trolling and realised he had 8 pages of contentless filter which is a massive scum tell and was backtracking on everything and was not inquisitive like I stated multiple times with meta instances and proof, OMGUS was because I was trolling. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:53 Steveling wrote: Poofter is lurker #1 I agree. Vivax has already taken stance yesterday, so I think he's sleeping/working/whatever now and when he's back he will contribute. Well then what do you make of his post, my debunking of it and Cava's response? Don't think you had an input into that. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:58 Steveling wrote: Vivax strong townread for me. I don't want you to just re-read his filter I want you to read the actual thread where what he says is misrepresentation of Cavalinho and hard defences of Oats based on falsehoods. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 10:02 Steveling wrote: Will I find different posts of his in the thread than in his filter? lol No but you can read the position they are in the thread by hitting the # button on the post and reading the context of them, just finding it interesting when you have the complete opposite read to me about Vivax and I want to know if you've actually read him in detail or are just spouting off something you think is true. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On May 06 2014 06:43 Holyflare wrote: You mafia vivax? Biggest load of bs contained in 2 paragraphs I've ever read. You're throwing around words like "misunderstood" or "misreads" instead of lying to get a towny lynched by any means possible. How can you possible defend oats saying he misread or misinterpreted when he said that he lied himself when he got caught out and then instead of you know, playing the game he just said how i am so mafia and wasn't doing anything instead of you know.... playing the rest of the game? His "in your face" town style is also wrong meta because in catastrophe he was exactly the same and was mafia. On May 06 2014 06:59 Holyflare wrote: These (^^^) are his first 2 posts from catastrophe, compare them to the first posts here: It's like, identical styles. In the top we see mafia Oatsmaster. In the bottom we see mafia Oatsmaster. On May 06 2014 07:19 Holyflare wrote: This is also factually incorrect, he never calls you scum at all: He calls you out on legitimate queries. It's a joke post, everyone saw it as a joke post and he explained his reasoning for the joke post and then you treated it like a real post, which IS weird (like I already said). So really vivax your post says nothing and you're not even representing what is happening in the game properly, not to mention the meta that doesn't align with oats. What gives? On May 06 2014 08:08 Holyflare wrote: Ok well, how about this: What reason does a towny have to post a manipulative post such as that? What reason does scum have to post a manipulative post such as that? I think if you talk it through it will be quite evident what you are already thinking in the back of your mind. ^^^^ is implied that there is no town motive behind what Vivax posted He's posted pretty much nothing. His one post of substance completely relies on false Oats meta and he ignores that Oats himself said that he lied and paints me in a scummy light for saying that oats did lie. It shows that he isn't reading the thread, he's hardcore defending a player based on wrong logic and random things (he did this in the last game as mafia on cavalinho). He has like half a page of filter and tries to paint cavalinho as scummy for calling him scum when that just wasn't the case at all. He has no investment in the game (something that rolling scum twice in a row would do) and is pretty much saying nonsense. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 10:06 Oatsmaster wrote: There are no mistakes. Also stevling seems to think im more likely to flip town. Is there any reason why mistakes = scum, stevling? Also I reread holyflares filter and I retract my scumread. ##vote mderg After thinking about vivax, I realised that his town read on me is really premature and the reasons he used are incorrect. H could flip scum too. I think I pretty much played exactly like the last 2 scumgames when he gave me the scumread so no real reason to think im town at the juncture Dare I ask..... can you elaborate on your read on me............? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Mderg... I'm not going to lie I have no fooking clue. He was lynchbait in Cell mafia when I played with him and his activity has been low in the games I checked of him previously and in Cell. I liked that he was on you for a bit but I am biased because it's me. I'm not sure I can reconcile these things together though: On May 06 2014 00:26 mderg wrote: I don´t understand your play right now, Oatsmaster. Why would you state something as fact, if you have no idea about it? On May 06 2014 01:53 mderg wrote: I still think Oats play was shit, he might be scum but that´s too big of a tell for just one stupid case. On May 06 2014 09:12 mderg wrote: I was about to post that I don´t agree with holy on you being scum, you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". I´d just call it a bad case based on wrong meta. Incidentally Holy made a case on me in cell mini mafia, also backed up with bad meta reasoning. He was town btw. I don´t like this post, though. What´s with "Mderg is scum too ok for sure."? Some explanation would be good. Lying to lynch someone is imo only fine in very few cases. Not with a weak case like yours, though. He goes from saying that you are just making things up, thinks your play is poop and doesn't know if you are scum -> doesn't agree with me that you are scum because suddenly it could just be bad meta...? If he was reading he'd know you said: On May 05 2014 23:32 Oatsmaster wrote: and would realise you made the entirety of it up so it shows that at least he isn't reading but unless he posts more it's still just a murky nullish for me.I did say that reason. Are you not paying attention Holyflare? The reason why i said that meta stuff is because it sounded nice and I had no way to check. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 10:21 Steveling wrote: Koshis filter in a nutshell 3 pages of filter with nothing to say. 10/10, could lynch | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 10:06 Oatsmaster wrote: There are no mistakes. Also stevling seems to think im more likely to flip town. Is there any reason why mistakes = scum, stevling? Also I reread holyflares filter and I retract my scumread. ##vote mderg After thinking about vivax, I realised that his town read on me is really premature and the reasons he used are incorrect. H could flip scum too. I think I pretty much played exactly like the last 2 scumgames when he gave me the scumread so no real reason to think im town at the juncture Can you elaborate on this, you give 0 reasoning for your mderg vote but then a lot of reasons why vivax could flip scum but seemingly your vote falls on the person with no explanation? Why mderg over vivax? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
There is also a voting thread you should be posting in....... | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 21:04 Vivax wrote: I think what I bold here has so much emphasis that HF is either hysterical about what oats did or adheres to an aggressive scumread push too early in the game. It reads so dramatic and theatrical that it gives me scumvibes. Don't know about you but I do tend to get emphas-y and emotional as scum. Again, it's one bit of the puzzle. I wouldn't base my whole read on this but it bumps it into a direction and hence I would like some feedback. Did you even read titanic 3?????? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 16:12 mderg wrote: Why do I even bother reading this thread, if you´re saying I don´t read it anyway? I was saying that he´s not 100% scum for his case on you, not that he´s town. Just because I don´t read things the same way as you it doesn´t mean that I don´t read this thread. You´re really pissing me off this game. I don´t like koshi´s play. This sounds like wanting to policy lynch Oats when there are actual leads that go somewhere, there are reads in the thread, so I don´t like the post. Also, what´s thrawn doing right now, I want to hear more from him. This is a major overreaction to what I was saying. Like super overreaction. I said oats didn't have a case his case was based on lies and mderg then said that oats probably wasn't scum because of bad meta....? Oats didn't use bad meta he flat out lied which is what i pointed out about mderg not reading but then he gets all super hardcore pissed at me because i pointed out something that doesn't add up...? Mderg you still need to explain this. Are you saying you don't think oats lied or what..? Previously you said you had NO reads on other players when me and oats had been posting so when and why did that change for oats? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 20:55 Vivax wrote: Overall we want to get an atmosphere of discussion and not plain accusation and I think his style works against that. When somebody simply calls the stuff you say dumb, even when your points were nothing extremely damning, but a point from where to start scumhunting, you will feel the urge to avenge your point of view you feel had some validity (to the point of giving it more weight what it deserves cause you have to defend it against that attack), that's what I mean by polarizing me vs. Cava and blowing things out of proportion. I refused to engage on the conversation with HF more than I did cause of this reason. Arguing with him would have put me in a position where I would have been trying to give my point more weight than it actually has, also making me biased towards my read on Cava. What did i do after i called it dumb? I posted the reasons why it was most likely a towny point of view to not put someone at L-2 even when trolling and you responded that scum like to do things to appear towny which implied cava was trying to act towny instead of just being town. I tried to make discussion happen and you decided not to do it. Not to mention you just stated that you didn't want to argue after I called it dumb but your only return post was to still talk about cavalinho and falsely talk about oats and then ignored everything i posted after that which nullified what you said. Why u not discuss things? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
 | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 20:57 Steveling wrote: I'm very happy with vivax, I would pet him if I could, lol. Very nice and logical posts. Can you explain this? You think what he's saying is contribution/good/towny? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 00:03 mderg wrote: That´s a bad question. I am trying to figure it out. It´s just that the whole back and forth with you and holy made it more difficult for me. Wait what...? The only way to figure it out is WITH the back and forth. I asked you AFTER the back and forth what you thought of oats and you said no opinion. Then you changed it to he might be scummy but not just based off that one thing. Then you posted saying you were going to disagree with me that oats was scum but oats was making it hard to do that with his posts and now it's MORE difficult to figure anything out with the same information you had before? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 18:09 thrawn2112 wrote: hey i'm back. what's going on? baby come back | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 00:26 mderg wrote: I don´t understand your play right now, Oatsmaster. Why would you state something as fact, if you have no idea about it? Here you realise Oats lied about meta, he later backs it up by saying he made it up to look convincing so other people would lynch me here: On May 06 2014 00:34 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont see what accuracy has to do with anything. Fact is, what convinces me is not what convinces other people and if I have to lie my ass off to get other people to listen, I dont see anything wrong with that. This is directly after what you wrote so you should have seen it. On May 06 2014 01:04 mderg wrote: I was not twisting anything to suit my purposes. I just think it´s stupid to state something as a fact, if you don´t know it for fact. I also don´t think it´s useless to point something out that I strongly disagree with. Even if Holy was scum, your case had absolutely nothing to back it up. Here you ignored the fact that he said he outright said that he LIED to get me lynched, instead you make it out to be him making a mistake. Quite some time later, you display no reason for any change of heart, any reasons to change your mind. On May 06 2014 01:37 mderg wrote: I´m still here, I don´t have anything to add right now. You even state that you have no opinion. So what changed between you thinking that he was scummy but maybe not because it's just one case to thinking he WASN'T scummy in this post: On May 06 2014 09:12 mderg wrote: I was about to post that I don´t agree with holy on you being scum, you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". I´d just call it a bad case based on wrong meta. Incidentally Holy made a case on me in cell mini mafia, also backed up with bad meta reasoning. He was town btw. I don´t like this post, though. What´s with "Mderg is scum too ok for sure."? Some explanation would be good. Lying to lynch someone is imo only fine in very few cases. Not with a weak case like yours, though. You even ignore the part where he said he lied on purpose, which led me to believe you actually HADN'T been reading. Then you got pissy at me for pointing it out. Explain to me what gave you those reactions, what made you change your mind, lay it all out for me like i'm a 5 year old wanting to learn. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 00:54 Koshi wrote: I am tired. I might be off for 12 hours. ~_~ | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". when I just proved that wasn't the case | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
If you can't convince someone to be lynched through normal means, resorting to lying is "using any means possible" that's not really a far stretch. Which is why it's more odd that you compare lying to using bad meta instead because the 2 are not equivalent at all. Unless you are implying they are. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 01:17 Koshi wrote: HF how are.your Vivax and Oats 100% scumreads doing? Oats not so much anymore, vivax pretty stronk. He complains that he didn't want to argue with me to stop discussion being stifled yet ignored everything i was doing to discuss his point. He returns to the thread with the same points previously but - the oats part which me and oats already disproved and when discussion starts he leaves again. He's talking at us rather than with us. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:04 Vivax wrote: And how does all of this make me scum? I bring my points across, you can elaborate on them or not and if you don't think they are true then you don't have to try and convince me so hard of your own point of view. I have trouble understanding what you're trying to achieve with all your actions. You want me to see Cava's post as townie, I don't think I have to. You want me to acknowledge Oats is a liar and that makes me scum. I use other ways of reading him. And when I don't agree with you and don't want to discuss that with you cause I don't enjoy that, then it makes me scum? Are you kidding? The scummyness is you're portraying ME negatively pre-emptively before an event even happened. "i didn't want to discuss cav's post to stop an argument", you haven't discussed ANYTHING. You sit back post random sidenotes about a read that hadn't properly evolved. You post a case on oats being town and when disproved you decided not to comment on any of it, take no part in the game, ignore everything i write to then return and tell us about cavalinho all over again. You've even completely dropped any mention of oats so i have to assume you actually AGREED with my points on him. You don't listen to any points about anything, there's no reason to believe you even care, you have no substance in your posts. "cav is more assertive as town" proves nothing says nothing, especially when he was assertive in that post and without proof of what you mean nobody has any idea if it's true or not . You don't question anyone, you don't even consider that you might have misread a post because you weren't there at the time whereas the people that were there say the post has a different tone. You are spreading doubt amongst people that are actually playing the game and you are lurking. Now tell me again how that's not scummy? Agenda 101. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:21 Steveling wrote: Can you guys drop this, vivax is super towny. If he's scum he deserves to win. I can't read him as scum. "super towny" "i can't read him as scum" What a hero. Nobody deserves to win if they are scum. Ever. Drop that line of thinking immediately. I've already asked you to explain why you think he is town but you haven't done it. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:27 Steveling wrote: I said multiple times that I find his behavior perfectly normal. That's good to know but we don't so point out specifically with quotes which parts are super towny. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:40 Steveling wrote: I refuse to do that since there are players yet to say anything. Don't get tunnel vision on him. I'm not at all but this post is beyond ridiculous to make. Why do you refuse yet state you don't want me to tunnel vision on him??? I think he is scum and have laid out why. You think he is supppeerrr town, super town enough for you to try and stop us discussing him but REFUSE to post reasons why you think he is town??????? What the fuck man. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:53 Koshi wrote: Holyflare makes me laugh. ?? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
How has there been like 0 discussion since i left??????? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
The category of doing nothing. Don't be a catastrophe koshi | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 04:10 thrawn2112 wrote: i'm gonna do my catch up one of two ways. i can either read stuff and respond to it as I read it or I'll read everythign without responding and keep notes and then post my notes when i'm done I hope you're doing the notes version, will give me something to talk about. Hopefully at least it will put you back up on my +town list. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
1) thrawn2112 - was originally green, regreen if notes good 2) holyflare 3) Cavalinho - get the feeeelz, l-2 post so town, picking up on all scummy stuff vivax is doing. Post more bro! 4) mderg - clueless but aggro in all the right ways, could be wrong because low game sample size 5) Koshi - meh koshi (catastrophe koshi or just a castatrophe?) 6) Tehpoofter - meh 7) Oatsmaster - really hesitant about oats but higher than meh /salty 8) Steveling - want to green but is sososo wrong on everything and didn't want to prove someone as towny?? Keep eye on 9) Vivax - pretty scummy, returns to thread to criticise and spread shit then afks again Non-green people better step up | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I don't really like Oats' post about "Vivax might be scum," because I get kind of an opportunistic vibe from it, especially when he said Holyflare could flip scum as well. I get the feeling that he's just kind of weighing his options when it comes to lynches, but the rest of his filter feels relatively towny. I lean town on Oats, but that most certainly isn't 100%. Can you explain this to me cava? I don't think he mentions me and vivax as being scum in the same post of anything? Seem to remember him dropping his scum read afyer reading my filter. Can you point out to me what you like? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 21:06 Vivax wrote: Why shouldn't Koshi be the lynch you're looking for? I'm not sure about most of my reads hence why I'm not pushing anyone aggressively, but I do call out the stuff I find as a possible scumtell. I'm not sure about any of my reads, except maybe on Steve but I'm probably biased cause he actually reads and understands what I write. So someone understanding what you write is town despite him being the only 1 out of 7 people. You do realise he called you super town without reading your filter and refused to back it up at all? He then completely flipped on that in his big read post. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
VIVAX Only thing I have against vivax is that he only defended himself so far, not a single read on anoyone. I want to see real posts or I'll give him scum points. So why include this in his list of scum people if he was just conceding to everyone's whim? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 23:16 Steveling wrote: How so? Is it because I was right when everyone else was wrong? Mby I'm just that awesome. Lynch oats or HF. Rofl oats or hf.... It's because you are right when everyone else was wrong but when asked why you thought vivax was super town enough to stop us discussing him you had no reasons. On May 06 2014 09:53 Steveling wrote: Poofter is lurker #1 I agree. Vivax has already taken stance yesterday, so I think he's sleeping/working/whatever now and when he's back he will contribute. On May 06 2014 09:58 Steveling wrote: Vivax strong townread for me. On May 06 2014 09:59 Holyflare wrote: I don't want you to just re-read his filter I want you to read the actual thread where what he says is misrepresentation of Cavalinho and hard defences of Oats based on falsehoods. Will I find different posts of his in the thread than in his filter? lol On May 06 2014 20:57 Steveling wrote: I'm very happy with vivax, I would pet him if I could, lol. Very nice and logical posts. On May 07 2014 02:27 Steveling wrote: I said multiple times that I find his behavior perfectly normal. On May 07 2014 02:40 Steveling wrote: I refuse to do that since there are players yet to say anything. Don't get tunnel vision on him. VIVAX Only thing I have against vivax is that he only defended himself so far, not a single read on anoyone. I want to see real posts or I'll give him scum points. On May 07 2014 14:18 Steveling wrote: I haven't dived him obviously yet. The general impression from reading the thread was that his posts are awesome. His posts are still awesome, I still agree with them and I find them logical. The thing is that after I dived him I noticed that he only defended himself. On May 07 2014 19:48 Steveling wrote: Alright guys, let's do this. Let's prove how nonsensical this is. ##unbote ##vote:Vivax On May 07 2014 22:29 Steveling wrote: I don't blame him at all. He's the only one with towny posts. Said you filter dived vivax. Didn't talk with anyone about vivax at all ever. In fact tried to shut down any and all discussion. Told me not to tunnel vivax, when asked why i should town read him you refused to answer (still wtfing about that). Randomly added him to your list of people you thought were scummy (why do that if you think he's super town....?), said you hadn't actually filter dived him yet but then did and started to agree with other people..... Yolo wtf vote on your super town read ahahahahah because you "don't care anymore" Still maintain he was super town and berating ppl post flip. Don't get me started on how you town read oats for his lies and said he was silly town and me and him were probably two towns arguing and then made a whole case on how his lies are scummy. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
If he was really so convinced he would never, absolutely NEVER vote for his super town read as town. The fact he did it AND CALLED OUT THE PEOPLE who were talking about scummy vivax to vote for him shows that he had a motive to do so. +vivax free mislynch | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 19:48 Steveling wrote: Alright guys, let's do this. Let's prove how nonsensical this is. ##unbote ##vote:Vivax On May 07 2014 19:50 Steveling wrote: 1 more vote and we lynch, come on guys. On May 07 2014 20:24 Steveling wrote: Come on guys, put your vote where your mouths are. Bote for bibax. Does this look like someone in the dark about vivax's alignment? Not to me. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote: Sorry Vivax Don't be sorry he played like ass. Although hammering him when you did was rather annoying /odd when we have infinite time to talk | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 00:00 Steveling wrote: If you are town hf, which I doubt it, after this game you shall sheep me blindly 'cause I earned it so. Well after I flip green that is. Instead of your baseless uselessness, how about backing up your reasoning with WHY'S instead of refusing to like you did with your super town read vivax. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 00:14 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah I dont know why steve is talking so much shit. Mdreg I think tmr rather than steve. Also explain why mderg, have you read his past games etc? Thought you had him as new town? (i still do) Also, why ignore overwhelming Steveling evidence? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 00:42 Steveling wrote: I said it 4-5 times already. You are either demonstrating bad logic again like with vivax or you are scum. And again this is useless because you don't explain ANYTHING. I posted my logic on vivax, people agreed with it. You didn't say a god damn word. You lied about reading his filter the first time because i already explained what you found out the time you actually DID read his filter but you don't mention that either. Your only reason for calling me scum seemingly was because me and oats argued and then he buddied me...? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:57 Steveling wrote: Reading Vivax I remembered another mistake by oats. Damn it oats, stop playing like this, I'd hate to lynch you and then you flipping green. On May 06 2014 09:58 Steveling wrote: Vivax strong townread for me. On May 06 2014 10:02 Steveling wrote: Will I find different posts of his in the thread than in his filter? lol I then posted: On May 06 2014 10:11 Holyflare wrote: God damn it I feel like I've wasted the past day of my life because you can't be bothered to read the thread in the first place: + Show Spoiler + On May 06 2014 06:43 Holyflare wrote: You mafia vivax? Biggest load of bs contained in 2 paragraphs I've ever read. You're throwing around words like "misunderstood" or "misreads" instead of lying to get a towny lynched by any means possible. How can you possible defend oats saying he misread or misinterpreted when he said that he lied himself when he got caught out and then instead of you know, playing the game he just said how i am so mafia and wasn't doing anything instead of you know.... playing the rest of the game? His "in your face" town style is also wrong meta because in catastrophe he was exactly the same and was mafia. On May 06 2014 06:59 Holyflare wrote: These (^^^) are his first 2 posts from catastrophe, compare them to the first posts here: It's like, identical styles. In the top we see mafia Oatsmaster. In the bottom we see mafia Oatsmaster. On May 06 2014 07:19 Holyflare wrote: This is also factually incorrect, he never calls you scum at all: He calls you out on legitimate queries. It's a joke post, everyone saw it as a joke post and he explained his reasoning for the joke post and then you treated it like a real post, which IS weird (like I already said). So really vivax your post says nothing and you're not even representing what is happening in the game properly, not to mention the meta that doesn't align with oats. What gives? On May 06 2014 08:08 Holyflare wrote: Ok well, how about this: What reason does a towny have to post a manipulative post such as that? What reason does scum have to post a manipulative post such as that? I think if you talk it through it will be quite evident what you are already thinking in the back of your mind. ^^^^ is implied that there is no town motive behind what Vivax posted He's posted pretty much nothing. His one post of substance completely relies on false Oats meta and he ignores that Oats himself said that he lied and paints me in a scummy light for saying that oats did lie. It shows that he isn't reading the thread, he's hardcore defending a player based on wrong logic and random things (he did this in the last game as mafia on cavalinho). He has like half a page of filter and tries to paint cavalinho as scummy for calling him scum when that just wasn't the case at all. He has no investment in the game (something that rolling scum twice in a row would do) and is pretty much saying nonsense. Which you ignored. And then: On May 07 2014 02:15 Holyflare wrote: Are you kidding? The scummyness is you're portraying ME negatively pre-emptively before an event even happened. "i didn't want to discuss cav's post to stop an argument", you haven't discussed ANYTHING. You sit back post random sidenotes about a read that hadn't properly evolved. You post a case on oats being town and when disproved you decided not to comment on any of it, take no part in the game, ignore everything i write to then return and tell us about cavalinho all over again. You've even completely dropped any mention of oats so i have to assume you actually AGREED with my points on him. You don't listen to any points about anything, there's no reason to believe you even care, you have no substance in your posts. "cav is more assertive as town" proves nothing says nothing, especially when he was assertive in that post and without proof of what you mean nobody has any idea if it's true or not . You don't question anyone, you don't even consider that you might have misread a post because you weren't there at the time whereas the people that were there say the post has a different tone. You are spreading doubt amongst people that are actually playing the game and you are lurking. Now tell me again how that's not scummy? Agenda 101. Which you told me to stop tunneling vivax and then refused to explain why he was town. So really, you didn't give a crap whether I'm tunneled or not and you didn't care about your super town read getting lynched. I say he's doing nothing but preemptive defences of why he isn't talking so much. You say stop saying he's scum he's super town then come with a list of people saying you've finally read vivax and his posts are all defensive with no reads. Please explain how you didn't get that on your first read of his filter when it's so evidently been pointed out. Yes, thats right. You didn't read his filter the first time. You lied. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 00:52 Koshi wrote: HF might be scum. This push feels like shit. Explain or you will not be in this game much longer. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You said you finally read vivax and that he is just defending. In your list of scum suspects. You voted for your super town read. This is an open and closed case. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You just reread it and said he was too defensive and then all of a sudden it's "hey poofter the guy i think is scummy said we should lynch vivax, i give up let's lynch him!" Huuuuuh? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 01:07 Steveling wrote: Ofc it is for you. Like bibax was. You mean the guy i scum read but when he was at l-1 i was trying to talk to to get a better read on? Yeh that guy. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Caught out in a lie. Too much alignment knowledge. He did similar things in cell too thrawn, "knew" alignments etc and got all cocky when called out. If and when i die i swear to god you better lynch him. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 00:59 Holyflare wrote: Explain or you will not be in this game much longer. This still remains unexplained and was really counter intuitive after koshi was saying i looked nothing like scum from last game | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 08:32 thrawn2112 wrote: can you link me specific examples? or just describe them and when they happened so that I'll know what to look for? and if anyone knows if he's played a town game then ples give link I remember him having an argument with gumshoe and then when people started calling him mafia he had a hissy fit and rage quit thread because of gumshoe posting about swearing on his life and then whenever someone disagreed with him about his arguments when he returned he acted super superior like he knew everything, hence major deja vu. He even has a similar refusal to answer post! On April 06 2014 01:13 Steveling wrote: You realise him and you arrived at 2 completely different conclusions? And I refuse to comment on your other post. Gumshoe also attributed that arrogance to a town Steveling (he was scum) I don't think your THAT arrogant Steve, therefore rayn has to be scum. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 20:09 Koshi wrote: Yes, you do look nothing like your scum game. But the instant push on Steve is so opportunistic. The guy looks bad after flip and you jump on him because he does a suicidal play? But you make an entire case out of it even though EVERYBODY can see what Steve did. It's not like Steve was pretending to have changed his read. He voted Vivax while he had Vivax as town. Yes, we saw that. What's new? Nothing. Both you and poofter don't add anything new. You just say: "Steve voted Vivax while he had him as town, Steve is scum". Which is in normally correct, but only if Steve tries to hide the fact he has Vivax as town. Now it was obvious. Then you aren't reading a single thing i wrote or the thread at all. Thrawn was the first to mention this stuff before, i pointed out that steveling has completely lied about what he was doing re:reading vivax. Says he read vivaxs filter - ignores all cases against vivax saying he read his filter and was super town - SAYS HE HADN'T READ VIVAX - says he hadn't read vivax and now that he has he agrees with things people have been saying How can nobody else see that at all? Even now he's just saying random crap when people try and ask him questions. The guy is NOT town | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
There is one weird thing you did pick out from poofter though, where he says Steveling's saving grace was how he carried him as scum last game. It's not a saving grace if that makes him look more scummy. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I really thought Vivax was scum because he refused to play the game like I know he can .HF should be town. I also felt he did the work I did in normall ass mafia but I don't like him anymore. Vivax had him and you as scum... Explain how these 2 go together. How can you think he was scum for not playing the game but then suddenly start to trust his reads because he was town after all. It still doesn't change the fact that he wasn't playing the game | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I'm not 100% but i can be confident and this is pretty self evident. Town doesn't refuse to explain town reads, town doesn't lie about reading someone's filter and calling them super town and ignores all the facts, town doesn't ignore all questions asked to just post statements on return. Poofters filter is mediocre but I'm not going to lie, i had the same thought about vivax being town because of what steve was doing but oats hammered him before i could ask anything properly. Regardless, i probably would have still lynched him | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 22:59 Steveling wrote: You guys played bad and read him bad and you are just jelly. My read was excellent and I will be here after the game ends to gloat. You told me not to tunnel him because he was super town, i asked you to explain why he was super town so i could get on with the game/see something i might have missed and you refused to explain why he was super town. You then said you actually hadn't read him and when you did he was all defensive and would gain scummy points if he continues, you didn't let him do anything but you "gave up" and wanted him lynched. Then you blame us for not listening to you? Grow up kid, you're scum. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 08 2014 23:54 thrawn2112 wrote: i'm sorry but i'm a little too frustrated with this game to be of any use right now Why frustrated? I have some solid towny people to get you through the game. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
r.i.p thrawn | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:09 Steveling wrote: I say we lynch Oats or HF. You guys pick one. So me and oats had an argument the entire start of the game because we're both scum making a play....? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Why vote straight away instead of discussion? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:32 Koshi wrote: Didn't you have Steve as 100% scum? What do you want him to say? ANY RESPONSE TO ANYTHING would be cool, don't even know why you're pointing this out when you literally just told us not to vote immediately. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:31 Steveling wrote: I did this with palmar. You could be scum buddies. You did not do it to that extent at all. Regardless, why did you oats town all throughout the start of the game when i was talking about him, voting him etc but then flipped to him being scum for the same reasons you town read him? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:44 Koshi wrote: Glad to see my wise words have an impact on you. So do you still have Steve as 100% scum or did thrawn dieing changed this? Nothing is ever 100%, thrawn dying had no impact on anything. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:50 Koshi wrote: And I got RB. Lol what? Why you? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:49 Steveling wrote: Don't give time to scum guys. Vote me or vote HF, I'm town, he's scum. But do it asap. Time to do what? The quicker the day the MORE scum favoured it is. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
No, I'm just curious why the hell they rb'd you, very very random. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:54 Steveling wrote: I won't discuss anything else than holyflare/oats being scum. Well then go afk so we can finish discussion on the rest of the game. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 01:39 Koshi wrote: He had to do something. He didn't do anything this game till then. Yeh but then why go against vivax consensus when he could have bandwagoned the vivax lynch everyone was agreeing with? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 04:51 Koshi wrote: The same counts for Steve. Why take the risk as scum and vote Vivax? So let's look at what Poofter did outside the Vivax lynch: - - - Oh yeah. That's it. No it's not the same for steve at all, he had maintained from the start that vivax was town. He even started to give him scum points at the end of the day. He was set there. Poofter was not. He has no incentive to call vivax towny because of Steveling at that point. If you're saying he did it to look better after the flip then everything you have been saying about Steveling not doing it for credit is bs. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Is that what you're suggesting? Or are you presenting an alternate theory or what? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 06:55 mderg wrote: Yes, that´s what I´m suggesting. It´s not that unlikely considering how obvious steve´s scumminess is. Ok, that's just a pretty odd conclusion to have :p The buddying you mention between me and poofter, where does that occur? I know me and koshi were talking about him previously but what input do you have to that discussion? Do you agree with koshi that poofter mentioning vivax was town because of steve looking like mafia was a case of too much information on poofters part then? If steve is really obviously mafia, why is koshi defending him so much? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
In his eyes his scum reads are calling him scum but all he's doing is caling them scum back and not answering anything from anyone. Koshi is playing super fucking weird. Everyone sees steve as scummy BUT koshi and koshi isn't asking steve any questions about his play or anything so how is he so sure? he even said "oh he might be scum" later. Everyone has called Steveling scummy but for some reason koshi uses vivax who didn't really feature in this game as a reason to flip his own meta read on me alone when it's not just me on steve | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 08:49 Oatsmaster wrote: poofter scum. Steve is a policy lynch at this point tbh. Can you explain? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 08:57 Oatsmaster wrote: Its kinda more like a gut read because Poof's mindset is a bit off. Its too encouraging of steve, i did that the last game cause it feels nice but town would be fucking annoyed with his shit. also He never ever gave a read on me, suddenly im super super scum. ^^^^ like this point a lot. Poofter keep saying everything about steve points to being scum. Then says if you're town you have to step up, oats case was good stuff. If Steveling's actions only point towards scummy, why would his case on you be good and why make a motivation speech if his actions are only scummy. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
This is majority lynch so if a town roles over and dies like he is doing its easy to get a misslynch pushed as scum. Did you just call him town??? :O:O | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Koshi is playing super fucking weird. Everyone sees steve as scummy BUT koshi and koshi isn't asking steve any questions about his play or anything so how is he so sure? he even said "oh he might be scum" later. Everyone has called Steveling scummy but for some reason koshi uses vivax who didn't really feature in this game as a reason to flip his own meta read on me alone when it's not just me on steve What do you guys think of this? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I have no idea what it means and I'm not going to speculate until he flips. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
3) Cavalinho - early town read, the more afk the less town read i/you should be giving him. Complains he never gets to day 2 as town, reaches day 2, much afk (careful town read) 4) mderg - my little fwend 5) Koshi - not asking questions to universal scum read, says vivax wasn't playing properly, took vivax's reads over his own meta of me, odd steve defenses 6) Tehpoofter - not enough activity until now, thoughts aligned about steveling/vivax at end of day 1 but giving steveling more outs and town motivation speeches are weird if he has been paying attention, keep eye on but higher than other greys. 7) Oatsmaster - investigator oats is on the case! Looks interested in finding out inconsistencies, early game was a twat but flip of read after reading my filter shows incentive to town read people, hasn't seemed too knowledgeable or pushy like is as scum 8) Steveling - self explanatory (read his last 2 or 3 filter pages lol) | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I guess I'll just say it's a newbie tell. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 09:45 Tehpoofter wrote: I gave my speech to him if it does nothing in the next time australians should post then I'm down. In the meantime what is your read on mderg and Koshi? I'm about to have dinner but I might get productive and dive some filters later if Steve is still silent. What do you hope to achieve with a motivational speech? If he is scum he just starts posting and you rethink everything all over again, you have to ask him direct questions about his play in the game otherwise he can just fabricate things. This also let's you slide by without putting in the effort to question him. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You asked why i have koshi as not town despite the rb. I don't think the way koshi is playing is towny at all. He was inactive really day 1 (long filter doesn't mean active) but still got rb'd above other people. I like to think I'm pretty good at finding blues so i checked koshis filter and there's nothing that even hints at a crumb so the rb claim is suspicious to me. Coupled with his play i think I'm happy not-towning him. He even called poofters posts null and it's frustrating he can't make a case on poofter?? Surely not being able to make a case on someone means they are likely to be town first and foremost and secondly he's not asking poofter real questions, just what did you hope to achieve etc etc only to come to the conclusion poofter is probably scummy for no reasons other than null. Also, you've been on steveling quite some time and all he had to do was self vote to get you to believe he was town? He literally is posting videos of the gf soundtrack. Dunno how much more of a scum claim you want. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
"hf is pushing me but he's still scum" How does that make sense....? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
At least be consistent in your nonsense dude. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 23:53 Oatsmaster wrote: yo hf you wanna lynch poof instead? He says todays lynch is boring because he already knows steve's alignment. But when hes talking about steve, he keeps switching from steve is scum, therefore something something something to, steve is town, therefore something something something. ##vote Poof I want to kill the player posting videos of the godfather soundtrack. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 23:57 Oatsmaster wrote: Its so much nonsense man. Why do you think thrawn got shot instead of you? Because i was obvious medic save? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
#meta | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Koshi is voting with the guy he just voted FOR. Koshi hasn't made a real case because "it's frustrating and he can't". If steveling doesn't get lynched here i don't even know wtf game of mafia you guys are playing. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Cya. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 10 2014 08:51 Cavalinho wrote: Check my filter. I already made it clear who my lynch targets were today. I'm leaning town on you for the moment. If we miss on Steveling though I'll probably just hiplynch you. I'm pretty sure that lynching either of you will produce at least one scum. How can you lean town on him but want to kill him if steve is town???? That doesn't really make sense? Also, vote steve. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
"but if he's town you're scum!" before he's even flipped and when you think he is scum yourself? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 10 2014 22:24 Koshi wrote: I really have nothing else to say. Somebody here? I can't believe any town would ever make a statement like this. Koshi comes up with a list of names that are so unqualified, make so little sense, have no reasoning for it whatsoever that makes him so so so strange. He defended steve all day for no reason whatsoever. He then conceded to vote FOR steve only to randomly backtrack and vote WITH steve. Cav saying that if steve flips town then poofter is scum and then randomly says "holyflare really needs to talk"??? Wtf dude I've spent everyday talking trying to push people in a direction because nobody could be bothered to do it. Steve was a great lynch, everyone thought he was scummy YOU included, so why specifically do I have to talk? Are you implying i look scummy now, do you just want my input or what? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 11 2014 01:01 Koshi wrote: Holyflare will just find the next 100% scum. Do not listen to anything he says. Just ignore his posts. Don't read them. Lynch Poofter tomorrow. If Poofter looks town (protip: he wont) lynch Holyflare. Outside those 2 make sure Oats contributes. If he says anything thats sounds almost intelligent he is probably town and to be ignored. If he is inactive and boring lynch him. So just look at who is actually sounding intelligent. Poofter needs to be super intelligent, if he is look at Oats, if he is. Lynch Holyflare. mderg is town or can win. I don't care about him. Please point out where I have called anyone 100% scum, I've questioned my reads, I've looked over everything and I've pushed lynches that made sense. You AGREED with a vivax lynch, you voted steve at one point and said he coukd be scum. You've been following my train of thought but suddenly "Holyflare so scum lololol" | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Don't listen to holyflare, anything he says (this implies im 100% scum like he is complaining I've been doing) but then says to lynch poofter OVER me and then SAYS THERE WILL BE TIME TO LOOK AT OATS TOO because he could be scum??? He's legitimately admitting that I'm not scum here rofl. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 00:04 thrawn2112 wrote: steve is where most of the frustration comes from. the rest of it is that I cant figure out koshi Legit think this is why thrawn was shot | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
^^^^^ best case scenario | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 11 2014 09:41 Oatsmaster wrote: What fucking plan Poof. I said steve is a policy lynch which meant I gave no shits about his alignment and there was no way to accurately tell it. I voted for you, so thats also bullshit. I think you keep forgetting there's a voting thread :ppp | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
koshi´s push has too little solid reasoning behind it. I don´t like how he´s tunneling you, not even accomplishing much. On May 11 2014 05:25 mderg wrote: I certainly didn´t think steve would flip town... I think it´s between poofter/oats/hf. Right now I´m not sure what to think. Poofter looks slightly more scummy to me than the others. I don´t know why he waited to vote steve until he could hammer him. This is really difficult to decide, though, I have to wait to see who gets killed. Maybe that can clear some things up. Also get mderg to explain this discrepancy. Going to bed, glgl | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
So new questions. Lets say a cop had a green check on me who is the scum team then? Now its not fair of me to ask and not answer so If I found out a cop had a green check on you my best guess would be something like HF/mderg or HF/Cav but I feel like if you're green HF almost has to be scum. HF/Cav need to talk for more info in this area but thats where I'm at. (just because I know that I'll get misquoted and people won't feel like I'm being theoretical I think the scum team is likely to be Koshi/Cav or Koshi/HF I won't say now which one I think is more likely but it has a lot to do with Cav/Hf talking/claiming) Why do you think I'm town all throughout the game but suddenly when it's the last day i'm in 3/4 of your suggested scum teams? Why not Koshi/mderg or Cav/mderg? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.afranko.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/99eaf3f95c8402688d9722a87ccacaca.jpg) "wah wah, all your posts are null but u scum, frustrating can't make case!!" Koshi, post-steve flip: ![[image loading]](http://blogs.trb.com/features/family/parenting/blog/halloween-judge.jpg) "everything in poofters filter makes him scum, i'm not 100% but I am 100%!" | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i said i wouldn't be around so that's probably why i lived or a blue snipe i dunno? end game does funny stuff to nk's | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 10:34 Tehpoofter wrote: What role are you? I'm VT Koshi claiming VT Mderg claiming what I guess amounts to named Vt?? Idk never played with that type of role before. that's a secret never to be told | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 10:39 Tehpoofter wrote: ??Its lylo. I can only think of 1 townie reason for not claiming but thats it. cool story | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
INTENTIONALLY OR UNINTENTIONALLY?  | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 11:36 Cavalinho wrote: I'm here. Holyflare who's scum? you tell me bro | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 11:44 Cavalinho wrote: Normally, when I have no idea what the fuck is going on, I pick the best player and I lynch them. So I'm gonna yolo it and say you and Koshi are both scum. haha, gonna claim your role? would be appreciated | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
which one of you is lying? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
TAKE A GUESS WHY I THINK ONE OF THEM ISNT REAL | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 12:07 Tehpoofter wrote: Which blue? and yeah I figured you were hinting when you said that thing about "needing to hear from Cav" doc, blue crumb is in my profile ^^^^^, only other time i've ever put a game and my role in my profile is titanic where I was town (call it a towny seal or w/e). N1 I saved Cavalinho, I followed my initial list of reads that I made on who to save here, I also went on a little blue/role hunt for the feelz: + Show Spoiler + On May 07 2014 11:38 Holyflare wrote: Where you guys should be at: 1) thrawn2112 - was originally green, regreen if notes good 2) holyflare 3) Cavalinho - get the feeeelz, l-2 post so town, picking up on all scummy stuff vivax is doing. Post more bro! 4) mderg - clueless but aggro in all the right ways, could be wrong because low game sample size 5) Koshi - meh koshi (catastrophe koshi or just a castatrophe?) 6) Tehpoofter - meh 7) Oatsmaster - really hesitant about oats but higher than meh /salty 8) Steveling - want to green but is sososo wrong on everything and didn't want to prove someone as towny?? Keep eye on 9) Vivax - pretty scummy, returns to thread to criticise and spread shit then afks again Non-green people better step up N2 I saved mderg for similar reasons (low post count, etc etc (newbie blue/scum tells). + Show Spoiler + On May 09 2014 09:55 Holyflare wrote: 2) holyflare - me, should be fooking obvious 3) Cavalinho - early town read, the more afk the less town read i/you should be giving him. Complains he never gets to day 2 as town, reaches day 2, much afk (careful town read) 4) mderg - my little fwend 5) Koshi - not asking questions to universal scum read, says vivax wasn't playing properly, took vivax's reads over his own meta of me, odd steve defenses 6) Tehpoofter - not enough activity until now, thoughts aligned about steveling/vivax at end of day 1 but giving steveling more outs and town motivation speeches are weird if he has been paying attention, keep eye on but higher than other greys. 7) Oatsmaster - investigator oats is on the case! Looks interested in finding out inconsistencies, early game was a twat but flip of read after reading my filter shows incentive to town read people, hasn't seemed too knowledgeable or pushy like is as scum 8) Steveling - self explanatory (read his last 2 or 3 filter pages lol) last time i said "someone is my fwend" was when I was medic in titanic 2 and used it to show who i was saving | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 12:44 Tehpoofter wrote: So its "Dr. Holyflare" So you know what this means right? If you're doctor there is at least one between Koshi/Cav lying about being RBd. Because I'm town you=blue leaving 3 possible. Mafia can't RB themselves right? so one of Cav/Koshi HAS to be lying about being RBd. hmmm this game is very very interesting. I'd like to see what Cav has to say he got quite when he heard there were two claims. I'm prepared anus wise. mafia can rb themselves | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
cav cav cav cav cav i summon you | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
IT'S COMING | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
##vote mderg | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 13:12 Cavalinho wrote: So let me get this straight. Your entire big play was...Voting for someone. yup :D:D:D | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i believe your rb and they didn't count on me being blue so fucked up in confirming townies | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 09 2014 06:26 Holyflare wrote: Mderg you think Steveling is mafia, pretty obvious at that. So then you also think that me and poofter could also contain scum because of buddying. That therefore means we are super hardcore bussing scum buddy Steveling then? Is that what you're suggesting? Or are you presenting an alternate theory or what? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
poofter: had me as town cav: had me as town mderg: had me/poof as scum koshi: me/poof as scum mderg/koshi team makes le sense | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 14:00 Cavalinho wrote: I would (almost) understand if mderg claimed medic or cop or something, but he claimed a powerless blue role. Why did he hide all game? And my only issue with not voting with HF right away is that Vivax and Steveling were both town. =/ don't know what else i can tell you other than everything I already have, I pushed the people I thought were scum :O | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/441596-gsl-open-mini-mafia-iv 13 ppl, not too many roles | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
All you should know is that mderg isn't getting hammered so he's mafia plan completed! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:31 mderg wrote: you´re 100% wrong. At least one of you and koshi is scum, possibly both of you. Are you refuting my medic claim?? It's pretty well substantiated. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
So there´s absolutely no way you could ever lie about that or have planned to claim medic later on. So you're saying. I witheld my role. Got all excited when you claimed a role and then wanted cava to claim his role just in case of shenanigans... Am i psychic or what?? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:48 mderg wrote: why would i tell you to unvote me? Saying that you´re wrong should imply that already. Because this is endgame and one misplaced vote is game over?????????????? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:53 mderg wrote: I´d rather reason out of this than just hope you unvote me just because I tell you to. If you were town. You have a medics vote on you, THATS INSTANT LOSE IF YOU ARE TOWN. I would yell and scream and tell me everything under the sun to get the vote off me in case scum were afk! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:57 mderg wrote: That´s exactly what I´m getting at. You´ve only used that as medic, so scum hf could use it to give a medic claim credibility later on. So in your world the roleblocker blocks....? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
A normal person who has invested like 2 weeks of their time questioning people, making reads, expending energy to solve the game becomes generally very emotionally invested. So when 2 weeks of effort could be ended in 2 seconds by a rogue vote that would spark rage, anger desperation to do everything possible to get that vote off before the game is auto loss, wasting all that effort. You aren't doing that at all. Your first reaction is to not believe a medic claim that was backed up by crumbs, that was evident by thread behaviour and was used in a way to solve the game and makes sense with a rber. Your reaction isn't towny! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 04:36 Cavalinho wrote: @Mderg, who is scum and why? And I also noticed that mderg swore on his life. Are we gonna put any stock in that? No, he told me IN THIS GAME that when I said it that it meant nothing whatsoever and he said he hated that post and now he tried to say it IN HIS FAVOUR. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Cavalinho + Mderg scum team: Cav had town cred, mderg claimed role, no need for cav to claim a role as mafia team because they would assume there would be blues. Poofter + Mderg scum team: Possible I admit, mderg not hammered on poofter return which indicates that they are scum together or poofter being hesitant as town. Koshi + Mderg scum team: Equally possible, moreso I'd say, busses mderg for the credit tomorrow when I inevitably die. Thought koshi was scummy all game. Every possible scenario hinges on mderg. This is a great lynch. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
bh hosts a lot and foolishness normally checks it afaik, i don't think they would make the game unbalanced. If it is this game is actually redundant and yes many strong words will be said by me in post game | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:23 Tehpoofter wrote: Well you're the one who knows if it is or not HF.... Like if you're really medic the game is fine. true dat, i was thinking of a world where you and koshi were scum but then i realised after i typed it the game would already be over :D | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:32 Tehpoofter wrote: HF how likely is Cav/Mderg to you? almost 0 | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:34 Tehpoofter wrote: So who do you think it is between me and Koshi? koshi | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 12 2014 10:28 Holyflare wrote: Also, Koshi pre-steve flip: "wah wah, all your posts are null but u scum, frustrating can't make case!!" Koshi, post-steve flip: "everything in poofters filter makes him scum, i'm not 100% but I am 100%!" | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:36 Cavalinho wrote: I'm really curious about what the graveyard/obs has to say about this game. And also I'm really curious why mderg is saying TP isn't conf town with me. Like nothing he said has made sense. I'm probably going to hammer him. he only just did now and he still hasn't put a vote down on me or koshi who in his eyes as town would be confirmed mafia | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:41 Tehpoofter wrote: Fuck you HF Fuck you Koshi and Fuck you most of all BH I'm voting mderg if we lose here this game is null and void and I hate it and I'm bitching like a little girl. ##Vote: Mderg a wise decision, now you lynch koshi tomorrow and gg | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 07:04 Tehpoofter wrote: I actually had a post all typed up where I was going to ask HF if he wanted to go on Koshi after he said that he thoguht mafia was him and mderg to ease my paranoia. I just saw that Cav posted he was voting and I like taking responsibility for hammers eitehr way. So my bad mderg its on me despite the claims I was getting there. IF it had been a full day might have been differnet. GG all thanks for hosting BH. WP mafia the RB on Cav wins the game and the claims. i would have lynched koshi and then nk'd nobody | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 07:07 Blazinghand wrote: thanks to my cohosts! sorry HF for rolling you scum again. I really considered rerolling the setup when you rolled scum, but I don't want people assuming other people are not scum just because they've been scum a lot so the host will cut them a break. it's cool :D | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 07:06 WaveofShadow wrote: Jesus tittyfucking christ HF how do you roll scum every game? AND WIN i don't even know T_T | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 07:14 mderg wrote: I think after this post it should have been obvious. Maybe I just think that because I knew who was scum, though but it's true? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 08:31 Steveling wrote: I had HF down ez, koshi only at the start, the slimy bastard buddie'd me halfway and I stopped considering him. you literally made the game 1000000000x harder for town playing the way you did, don't do that again | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 09:03 Blazinghand wrote: One additional thing I'd like to add is that you should never trust crumbs that aren't in-thread. Anything pointing out-of-thread is completely editable. I could arbitrarily edit my profile after the fact to have the current crumbs, or update my signature, or whatever. I also consider it in poor taste to use out-of-thread things to communicate with the thread and anyone who does this in the future can expect to get chewed out in the endgame. Consider, for example, a link to an image on a website that you post as an embedded image on TL then you change the image on the website; this is pretty close to "editing" and is imo not coolio. I haven't explicitly banned this sort of thing in my OP, but going forward I will be adding the following rules: Editing your posts is not allowed. This includes indirect editing like linking an image, then editing the image. Editing your profile or signature are allowed, but if you try weird tricky things I'll get mad at you and do stuff. makes sense, i did just add it at the end anyway | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 09:08 Oatsmaster wrote: I fucking caught you holyflare. Man this always happens to me. Bleh I push one scum, then change my mind and get bit in the ass. :D | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 13 2014 18:32 marvellosity wrote: Pretty town-favoured setup tbh (simply being able to claim, truthfully, twice is pretty good). Town shit the bed pretty hard at lylo. Cav, big plays are usually bad plays. #1 play = lynch mafia. gj scummers. edit: wtf Holy 18 page filter in 69 page game. Insane. was half the threads posts on day 1 :D | ||
| ||
