Newbie Mini Mafia XLV - Page 69

On August 09 2013 20:38 DeusXmachina wrote:
I also wanted to point out that slam has been absent from a lot of the lynches. Namely RDO, Zyrre, and Gotard. Oh wait, that is all but one. Generally scum distance themselves from the lynches. Also, notice how his behavior has changed once we started being suspicious of him. He has had more analysis posts in the last 24 hours than his prior 300 posts. Why all of a sudden the change? His big analysis posts were entirely absent from the beginning of this game, and what he is doing now can hardly be called solid analysis.

On August 09 2013 20:50 DeusXmachina wrote:


I want to break this post down point by point. It is one of slams more recent and longer posts.
1. First quote. He follows it up with a question. This contributes nothing. If he was town wouldnt he want to back this up with solid reasoning. For example, "Deus is scummy because he is defending Umasi".no, when town my goal is TRUTH. That would not be a true accusation. You guys can see how this is totally irrelevant now right? question not answered but rather attacked. How townie.

2.Second quote. After the quote he contributes literally nothing. He says some bullshit about stumbling around like drunks and the vets probably pulling their hair out. Why would he even quote me if he is just going to spout some fluff afterwards? He has been doing this all game.

makes same point Umasi did later. We all have been asstalking.

3. Third quote. "But augh, this is so town!" Are you kidding me? You are trying to make a case against me dude!what mindset convinced you that I don't care who we lynch at MYLO?. Why would you bring up a quote just to say. Augghhh this is so town. Why wont you take a strong stance on anyone Slam? because I'm not scum. If I were what am I afraid of now? I just need to frame well, and am all knowing. Wait, that is the stance you have taken

4. Forth quote. Tops it all off with something that hardly makes sense. WOULD PEOPLE GIVE ME A BREAK ABOUT NOT MAKING SENSE. I SERIOUSLY CAN'T BE THAT CONFUSING- I BET IT'S JUST HIP NOW, SLAM DON'T MAKE SENSE BRO JUST 'MIT IT. I mean wow, I'm basically postin the same way I talk and not many people have troue understanding that! I mean sometimes of course, but this is like all the time!

Svengali is a character in a book who hypnotizes an opera singer to make her able to sing but charges her extorbitantly and has her doing his services when not hypnotized. So people use Svengali to speak of the manipulator character. Ex: Karl Rove was literally called this with regard to George W. Bush.

On August 09 2013 17:26 DeusXmachina wrote:
....................................................................................Alakaslam...................................................................................

Over the next day and a half I plan to work on convincing the rest of you guys that Slam is scum. In order to do this I will elaborate on the points I discuss tonight as well as offer more examples of what I am talking about. This serves as a introduction to what we should all explore in the next couple days. Lets begin.

Allignment: Scum

Overview:

1. Weak contributor and does not offer new ideas
2. Blends in with town
3. Does not take strong stances and is indecisive
4. Voting patterns

These actions are all scummy. As you may have noticed I am arguing the opposite points as I brought up on Umasi. I aim to prove that Slam is the last scum. If you would like me to elaborate on any of these points or offer more examples let me know. For the record I read all of slam's filter.

1. Contributions? Hardly
Slam has been playing a game of deception. It is almost astonishing to think about, but he IS the last Scum. Well why is it astonishing you ask? Simple. His massive amounts of posts have fooled everyone. He made it seem like he was contributing all the while in that 20 page filter of his was absolutely nothing of value. I implore you to look at how often he simply quotes something, offers nothing of value after the quote, and moves on. This is his first noteworthy post. Guys this is on filter page 13 and he started the game on 3. He went 10 fucking pages without contributing a damn. He slid through the ENTIRE reps lynch without offering anything. He frequently says things like "DEFEND YOURSELF". What does that offer? So often he quotes and says something stupid afterwards. What does THAT offer? Absolutely nothing. (Sidenote: there is so many examples of this stuff that I am not going to put them here. Please read his filter to see what I am talking about. Like I said I will happily generate specifics to make my point. This is just the beginning.) He votes Gotard but give almost no reason why. He does not make a strong stance against Gotard to explain his vote. Not only that but he is extremely indecisive over his Gotard vote (more on that later). Finally he does not contribute to the Zyrre discussion, and he does not contribute to the RDO discussion. In his 20 page filter he maybe has less 2 or 3 valuable posts.

2. Blends in with the town?
How obvious is this now that we are all thinking about it. The only thing that sets Slam apart is his wacky posts. But slam has gone completely uncontested, unnoticed. He has masterfully faked contribution. He has overloaded us with posts. He has bandwagoned on all of his votes and decisions. All for what? To appear town. It is clear to me now that Slam has been merely blending in. I think the reason so many of us overlooked it was because of his wacky posts. Slam never stickes himself out there. Has he ever been the first to take a stance against someone? NO. Has he ever been the first one to contribute new ideas? NO. Has he ever stuck his neck out there, had some really controversial opinions? NO NO and NO. He has been blending in this entire game.

3. Indecisive must be his middle name
Slam is very indecisive. IF you don't see this as a scummy thing go read part of the General Guide to Mafia. The best example of this is his vote against Gotard. He votes Gotard, unvotes, votes Umasi, unvotes, and finally votes Gotard again. Same thing with reps. Votes me, unvotes me, votes reps, unvotes reps, votes scam unvotes scam, votes reps. Look how indecisive this guy is being! It is absolutely ludacris. It goes to show that he is not taking strong stances against anyone. Slam has not taken a strong stance on anyone (p.s I know these transitions are painful, but who gives a fuck. I am not writing an essay here). Seriously! Go find me one example of a strong stance? He has none. He didn't have a good case against me (lol at the kenpachi rule), he didn't have a strong case against reps, he didn't have a strong case against Gotard, or Scam, or RDO, or Zyrre, or ... You get the point. NOBODY! He doesn't take a strong stance against ANYONE. More examples of this to come. A great example of his indecision is when he talks about reps in some of his posts.

4. Voting patters
I have already talked about this prior to this paragraph but let me summarize why his voting patterns are weird. He switches his vote a lot. He is one of the last ones to vote reps. He tags along with almost all of his other votes. Votes Gotard again after unvoting him. Votes RDO and Zyrre after others voted against them. His voting patterns exemplify his indecision.

I think there is a lot more that can be said about Slam. HE IS THE FINAL SCUM. If you don't believe me now I will spend the next day and half trying to convince you. I only wish I would have realized this earlier. Like I said, I can give a lot of examples when we get deeper into this discussion.

On August 10 2013 02:57 DeusXmachina wrote:


What happened to going down fighting? What happened to not going down like RDO? Fight damnit! If you are town prove it.

On August 10 2013 03:12 DeusXmachina wrote:
EBWOP I should have said takes a stance against Umasi not takes a strong stance