|
To Stutters
You did explain your reasoning of Cubu. And that was a very easy target to jump on, and its quite clear that both mafia and townies jumped on the wagon once it got rolling. So that is a 100% null-read.
During D2, you have provided two posts worth mentioning: 1st) Discussing the meta of Kville. Once again, this is the most likely target jump on given his behaviour. Could obviously be geniune suspicion, but you have to agree that should you be mafia, jumping on those two targets is a very easy thing to do. 2) Defense against KillingTime's accusation. While also adding a FoS back on him.
What you HAVE NOT done: - Responded in any way to the accusations on you by thrawn back on D1 and N1. Here, let me refresh your memory: + Show Spoiler +On September 04 2012 21:44 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2012 16:26 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: You're saying we're focus too little on motives? The motive of flying under the radar is to just sit back while the town starts flinging poo on eachother. I'm still not sure what your motive of making generic posts was. Maybe someone who followed XXIV can chime in? Thrawn, it seems like you were playing that game?
I'm not exactly sure what you want me to chime in on but I'll talk about scumhunting priorities that you and stutters seem to be arguing about. In XXIV, there was a massive shit-flinging fight between shady and I. There were people who thought shady was being completely illogical, and there were people who though I was being completely illogical. The vote was closely split between shady and I and shady ended up getting lynched. But the people who voted for either of us voted on the premise that illogical posting = scum. There weren't any good scum-motive explanations for either shady or my actions and the votes were completely based on "well this guy says dumb stuff." Then D2 I got lynched and flipped vigilante, and once again nobody was voting based off scum-motive suspicions. The case against me was that my vig claim was unbelievable, and there was an association case against me because another player and I had made extremely similar posts at the exact same time which made people think that we were in conversation with each other as scum. Meanwhile there was a player who had been saying extremely illogical stuff, but most people gave him a town read because they thought there'd be no way that a scum would be so illogical. His actual actions/votes were so extremely scummy throughout the whole game. However, people ignored that because they were spending too much time trying to make reads based on the quality of his posts, when instead they should have been looking at his motives behind the posts. The point is motives>quality of posts in terms of importance to making reads. That was the reason I favored lynching stutters over cubu. They both were heavy lurkers without much actual contribution in the few posts they had made. The people who voted for cubu did it because the quality (reasoning, writing style, and relevance to the thread) of stutter's posts was much higher than cubu's. So in their eyes, having low quality posts (see my earlier definition of quality) makes you look scummy. I didn't think that was a good assumption to make, and I preferred voting stutters because stutters had done less scumhunting than cubu. At the time of deciding between the two, the only scumhunting stutters had done was the very last paragraph of this post. Cubu of course hadn't done as much scumhunting as most poeple, but his contributions towards finding scum were more than what stutters gave. It was a vote based on motives instead of quality... somebody who doesn't scumhunt (ask questions, state what you find scummy, accuse people with FOS and such) is not a town player. - Shared any townreads throughout the whole game. - Shared any scumreads except for right now against KillingTime. - Explained your (relatively) low activity. - Scumhunted. Thats stuff you have NOT done.
To me, you're trying to create a Stutters vs KillingTime situation similar to Kush vs Drazak in attempt to create confusion. You. Are. Still. Not. Contributing. Though. Show us some reads and do it well. Actually, I'd argue this might be a good time for you to create a list (yay, list discussion!) with your complete reads on everyone.
As for my opinion of Stutters. He is 2nd on my vote list, well ahead of everyone except Kville. Those two stand out big time to me.
|
It is about 15h to lynch?
Yes my case is associative, I do think that is a fair point against it and I didn't know (but can see the logic) for why that makes it a weaker case.
@drazak I am reading Kush's filter again for the allegations you made and will also post my thoughts on it.
|
Killing Time
He's appeared pretty active all game and trying to contribute. However when I look closer at the posts I don't see the same feeling I get from an overview of them.
+ Show Spoiler +On September 02 2012 23:09 KillingTime wrote: When we call for an “active” thread - I think what we mean is players making logical cases and then responding to them.
Here are my current reads so far. I would consider them weak ( esp as we have players who have hardly/not posted yet), but if they are not addressed in later play then I will be concerned - :
Scummy: SonicDeathMonkey: I appreciate your efforts to keep the thread ordered and moving along. But, that is a nice null read at best. Your posting reads too much like scum trying to push others along without much substantive play in the hope that it will create a nice wagon to jump on or an outspoken townie you can target. You must stop trying to play threadcop and post some original reads with better reasoning.
JacobStrangelove: Almost every post in your filter thus far is wishy washy and lacking in any content - your conclusion on lynching lurkers? It comes down to instinct. On nolynch day one: You disagree(only acceptable response to that dumb question) - but do “know what you mean”. On my first post? “Maybe it was pointless.. but on the flip side”. You have managed to be active without any content on even the most innocuous of debates - scummy until you get more involved with the thread.
WeeTee - I agree with thrawn that only a fluffy first post, is now hard to justify now that there has been some discussion. Needs to follow up with a better second post. Weetee can stand in for anyone else who has not posted as well, at this point we have enough of a thread that just a fluff post is not a good entrance.
Towny: thrawn Xatalos Both have posted good content, logically reasoned.
Unsure: Kushm4sta’s posting so far confuses me. I need to think about them more/see what else he posts before I develop any kind of read.
Fluff: - I have never watched the TV show the flavour for this game is based on - so please don’t make any jokes and expect me to understand them.
His second post in the game is his best one (Calls out lurkers, poses questions to Jacob and Sonic). When Jacob didn't answer in a satisfactory way he called him out for it and got Jacob to answer. I'm assuming he felt Jacob's reads were sufficient at that point since he doesn't bring it up again. With Sonic Death Monkey he calls him out and once Sonic answers he immediately drops any suspicions.
These were his only reads and he dropped them after short responses from the people. The rest of this post was simplying saying lurking is scummy and these guys I feel are town off of their few posts.
+ Show Spoiler +On September 03 2012 16:21 KillingTime wrote: Good morning all - ATM the player who I am most suspicious of is the one who has attempted to make a contribution to the thread but did so with a post that gave us no opinions or information that we didn't already have. I want to see if he is capable of at least trying to make posts that are interesting/valuable or if he is scum and just trying to skirt around beeing seen as a "lurker". I don't want the to be any trains started without one of them being Him because his style suggests so far that he might just come back and jump on one at the back.
##Vote WeeTee On September 03 2012 23:57 KillingTime wrote: I kind of feel that a kville lynch would be similar to a kush lynch. We seem to agree that for a mafia to go out and make the d1 posts that kush did would be very gambley/spaz mafia play. Well, the same thing surely applies to Kville - I don't like the fact he is lurking like a submarine - but at this point, given how every active player has repeatedly stressed that they want town to be posting - the total refusal of kville to do that kind of makes me think there are better lynch targets (atleast for d1, d2 is a different story and kville is certainly going to need a good explanation and good d2 play if he does survive).
On a percentage basis I think it is more likely that cuba or weetee or stutters (who never asked those "questions" he was promising) or drazak are scum who have realised their mistake and are trying to cover for it - rather than kville who is being such a blatant lurk.
Weetee says that "In my opinion my previous post is succinct of my town reads and its what I wanted to say which should be valued by everyone as a whole"
My point was that I did not think your town reads added much to the thread, partly because I am very sceptical of "meta" reads at this point given that we all have 3 or less games. I could persuaded to change my vote off you given that others have not agreed with me, but to do so I do need to hear from you not about who you think is town - but who you think is scum!
On September 04 2012 05:32 KillingTime wrote: Weetee are you around? I made a request earlier for you to do some scumhunting and I would really like to see some before the deadline/I comment more...
I am ignoring Kville for the moment... I think the quality of his posts is self evident, but he is just a distraction atm. On September 04 2012 06:31 KillingTime wrote: I assume EOD is "evening of deadline"?
Yawn - Ok... I am going to ignore Kville for the moment because his posting is useless.
At this point I am happy to get on Kush's Cubu wagon. He has made a cogent case for why Cubu is a decent lynch and has offered up a plausible reason (meta) why he prefers him to Weetee. I have said already that I am sceptical of the value of meta in a newbie game, but looking back at the thread I can't honestly say I have a better case on Weetee than Kush does on Cubu and all day 1 reads are fairly weak by necessity.
Weetee still remains in my mind though and I certainly will want to examine him again D2. He has ignored/not seen/not yet answered my request, but I assume he will see it when he comes to vote soonish assuming he does not want to get modkilled. As I will be asleep for the lynch - gl town.
Again he calls out a lurker and votes WeeTee. No real analysis, just "hey you haven't posted." Finally to end D1 he sheeps onto Kush's case on Cubu [More on this later] (Posts in spoilers). Notice how up until this point he hasn't comitted to a single lynch except wanting to lynch WeeTee for lurking? Despite all of his posting throughout Day 1, he really only managed to get a couple sentences out of Jacob and Sonic and bring up a lurker constantly (any scum could just as easily do that as a town, null read).
Day 2 consists of more of the same. No reads or cases until this post: + Show Spoiler +On September 05 2012 17:57 KillingTime wrote:@Kreb: I would consider kush & sonic (who i suspect d1 but for weak reasons and who has played well since then) to be the most town players at the moment, with Kreb & drazak someway behind them. They are all active and seem to be trying to help town. But many of them seem to be abit at loggerheads so I want to go through filters this afternoon and see whether I still agree with these reads. I agree my post last night was broad/reluctant. That is because I broadly agree about kville, but really hope we can do better because even if kville is mafia he is the weakest member of the mafia as well in terms of finding the whole mafia team. In terms of those I am suspicious of at the moment: Weetee/imcasey - No change since my last post when I said they were null for the moment (perhaps jacob did not read that post?) and that the need for replacement might have explained what I found scummy about them, but that I would be watching closely. I am not sure how this can be seen as “bandwagoning with xtalos” as Jacob has suggested. If you look at Xatalos’s vote he voted for Cubu early, when I was still voting for wetee.. which hardly seems like bandwagon activity to me. Jacob - I am trying hard to be objective about you and not fall into an OMGUS trap just because you are pushing me. But, I really dislike your play-style, posts like this one: Show nested quote + Well this does bring an interesting side to it. While what he said makes sense, the benifit we would gain from confirmed town was lost when that confirmed town died. Also Kush is going for Xatalos, now. (which I partly agree with) also xatalos (and myself) did go on the cuba wagon when it was tied up. So my theory that Killing Xatalos having a gamble scum (kville or stutters) could be correct. But then does that make Kush innocent? Also we lost the two that were going for drazak, so is drazak scum protecting himself with NK and lynch? (information over load). He goes for kush when kush goes at Xataos. Is he the third scum, and kiville a spazzy town, along with stutters? There is just to many possibilitys it's annoying. seem to be designed just to confuse townies while saying almost nothing of value. At this point in the game town has very little information, so we can dream up any number of scenarios to second guess the mafia actions, I don’t think that kind of theorycrafting will help us catch scum. Your current argument seems to be that Xatalos & I are/were attempting to bus weetee/imcasey because I was more suspicious of him (unknown alignment) over cubu (confirmed town) on d1. I find this argument hard to understand and it seems more driven by your suspicions/attempts to smear me. Xatalos - I don't know what to make of the fact that jacob is pushing him alongside me. But, I would like him to explain why he thinks that Stutters695 is a much weaker case than imcasey, given that the need to be replaced seems to count in Weetees/imcaseys favour but not in his on d1 and there has been little from either of them on d2. Kville/Stutters - yep these two guys exist, not much more you can say about either unless stutters decides to be helpful (I have no hope with kville)
Again more non-committal thoughts. He still hasn't tried to make a case on anyone until his case on me.
Now the issues with the case on me that tie into his posting habits in general. Up until the case on me he hasn't posted a valid train of thoughts as to why someone is scum. It has all been one liners and individual quotes which he doesn't even pressure after asking.
He says earlier in his filter "but looking back at the thread I can't honestly say I have a better case on Weetee than Kush does on Cubu and all day 1 reads are fairly weak by necessity." He claims Kush's case on Cubu was better than his on WeeTee yet now he is trying to pin Kush as scum proxied through me for pushing a case on Cubu instead of me. If he is so suspicious of me he should make a case on me not "well Stutters hasn't been active so he's better than the other lurkers because if he's scum then these people might be scum." That is the exact same thing he is accusing Kush of doing. Once again he has appeared active without actually producing anything but a completely WIFOM case that will fall apart once I flip town and he'll just say "oh I guess I was wrong but I really wasn't 100% sure and it made sense so it's not my fault."
My question to Killing Time is who would your #1 scum read outside of me be and most importantly WHY.
|
The case is associative but also not entirely based on it. Kreb has made his points (very good points in particularLook at these and respond) killing his and I mine.. (Although you confused me half way through it when you posted{and lol list discussion -_-}) and also your point about if you flip town we get nothing isn't entirely true. Will put a bad light on killing and several others and I am sure we would have enough time looking at day one and day two to get a mafia lynch. While we would be in a bad spot if you are town if killing is town you or I get lynched the next day (probably and let’s be honest that would be a good decision) One of us is probably town (considering my interaction with you{you hardly posted so you haven’t interacted with me}) So it would likely result in a mafia win. However what happens if someone flips is often speculation so not a great defence or argument. For example we thought (or at least I did) cubu flipping would give us something....
I am going to bed in around 6 hours. If you haven't responded to krebs points in particular in a proper way I will likely vote you over kville. (as kville was the backup after all)
|
On September 06 2012 18:56 Kreb wrote:To StuttersYou did explain your reasoning of Cubu. And that was a very easy target to jump on, and its quite clear that both mafia and townies jumped on the wagon once it got rolling. So that is a 100% null-read. During D2, you have provided two posts worth mentioning: 1st) Discussing the meta of Kville. Once again, this is the most likely target jump on given his behaviour. Could obviously be geniune suspicion, but you have to agree that should you be mafia, jumping on those two targets is a very easy thing to do. 2) Defense against KillingTime's accusation. While also adding a FoS back on him. What you HAVE NOT done: - Responded in any way to the accusations on you by thrawn back on D1 and N1. Here, let me refresh your memory: + Show Spoiler +On September 04 2012 21:44 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2012 16:26 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: You're saying we're focus too little on motives? The motive of flying under the radar is to just sit back while the town starts flinging poo on eachother. I'm still not sure what your motive of making generic posts was. Maybe someone who followed XXIV can chime in? Thrawn, it seems like you were playing that game?
I'm not exactly sure what you want me to chime in on but I'll talk about scumhunting priorities that you and stutters seem to be arguing about. In XXIV, there was a massive shit-flinging fight between shady and I. There were people who thought shady was being completely illogical, and there were people who though I was being completely illogical. The vote was closely split between shady and I and shady ended up getting lynched. But the people who voted for either of us voted on the premise that illogical posting = scum. There weren't any good scum-motive explanations for either shady or my actions and the votes were completely based on "well this guy says dumb stuff." Then D2 I got lynched and flipped vigilante, and once again nobody was voting based off scum-motive suspicions. The case against me was that my vig claim was unbelievable, and there was an association case against me because another player and I had made extremely similar posts at the exact same time which made people think that we were in conversation with each other as scum. Meanwhile there was a player who had been saying extremely illogical stuff, but most people gave him a town read because they thought there'd be no way that a scum would be so illogical. His actual actions/votes were so extremely scummy throughout the whole game. However, people ignored that because they were spending too much time trying to make reads based on the quality of his posts, when instead they should have been looking at his motives behind the posts. The point is motives>quality of posts in terms of importance to making reads. That was the reason I favored lynching stutters over cubu. They both were heavy lurkers without much actual contribution in the few posts they had made. The people who voted for cubu did it because the quality (reasoning, writing style, and relevance to the thread) of stutter's posts was much higher than cubu's. So in their eyes, having low quality posts (see my earlier definition of quality) makes you look scummy. I didn't think that was a good assumption to make, and I preferred voting stutters because stutters had done less scumhunting than cubu. At the time of deciding between the two, the only scumhunting stutters had done was the very last paragraph of this post. Cubu of course hadn't done as much scumhunting as most poeple, but his contributions towards finding scum were more than what stutters gave. It was a vote based on motives instead of quality... somebody who doesn't scumhunt (ask questions, state what you find scummy, accuse people with FOS and such) is not a town player. - Shared any townreads throughout the whole game. - Shared any scumreads except for right now against KillingTime. - Explained your (relatively) low activity. - Scumhunted. Thats stuff you have NOT done. To me, you're trying to create a Stutters vs KillingTime situation similar to Kush vs Drazak in attempt to create confusion. You. Are. Still. Not. Contributing. Though. Show us some reads and do it well. Actually, I'd argue this might be a good time for you to create a list (yay, list discussion!) with your complete reads on everyone. As for my opinion of Stutters. He is 2nd on my vote list, well ahead of everyone except Kville. Those two stand out big time to me.
Townreads are worthless. I'd rather suspect everyone who isn't confirmed rather than risk having a "town feel" on someone and completely overlook a scumslip because they're townie to me. It also gives the scum a grasp on where they sit in relation to everyone else.
I work 30-40 hours a week and am a full time student in my Junior year. Trying to explain why I'm not here isn't really relevant when if you believe that is determined by if you believe I'm town or not.
There really isn't much to respond to on Thrawn's case. He felt I was more scummy than Cubu, obviously I know I'm not. I'm giving you my best reads right now, there isn't much more I can do than that.
|
What about sharing scum reads? or is that down to time as well. You accused killing of the same thing.
|
On September 06 2012 19:42 Stutters695 wrote: Townreads are worthless. I'd rather suspect everyone who isn't confirmed rather than risk having a "town feel" on someone and completely overlook a scumslip because they're townie to me. It also gives the scum a grasp on where they sit in relation to everyone else. Very good time to reveal your disdain for townreads I must say. But very well. I could argue about your claims being bad, but I cant really argue about whether you truly believe what you say or make it up. So this didnt put you in a worse spot to me. Not better either though, as it was a very standard reply from what you'd expect.
On September 06 2012 19:42 Stutters695 wrote: I work 30-40 hours a week and am a full time student in my Junior year. Trying to explain why I'm not here isn't really relevant when if you believe that is determined by if you believe I'm town or not. Same here really. Cant double check what you do IRL. Standard reply. Neither putting you in a better nor worse light.
On September 06 2012 19:42 Stutters695 wrote: There really isn't much to respond to on Thrawn's case. He felt I was more scummy than Cubu, obviously I know I'm not. I'm giving you my best reads right now, there isn't much more I can do than that. This, however, does put you in worse light. There is much to respond? Why on earth would a townie not feel the need to respond to accusation?!?! And you are not giving me your best reads, you're giving us a read on KillingTime. Singular. And yes, there is certainly more things you could do.
Overall score: -1 to your towncred for the last part good Sir.
|
@Jacob+ Show Spoiler +On September 06 2012 18:51 JacobStrangelove wrote:I am going to reply to sonic in this post as quoted Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 17:35 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:On September 06 2012 13:31 JacobStrangelove wrote: Also on drazak he posted his twitter gave the option for photos about the move (yes going though the filters) and sleeps strange hours. He would have to be a master scum. For me He is town. Sleeping strange hours and moving is townie? Drazak is pretty much a null read for me atm. I am just saying he was mostly lurking day one but he had reasons. Sure he might be mafia with these same reasons but we are talking about real reasons that really happened. After that he has been much more active and helpful, this was not the extent of it though read the post right above this and you see my comment about pushing such a solid townie at the time. This said there has been some discussion over kush at the moment now that things have calmed down. (will get to this later) Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 17:15 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: 1. I just wanted to include it so that my post would be a fair representation of your suspicion of KillingTime (the post might be helpful later).
Fair enough. Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 17:15 Sonic Death Monkey wrote:
2. Could you provide a post where you explain those town reads clearly? Your writing is really confusing so you need to straight that up.
I will list the townish people most I have given reasons for before. Sonic Myself! Imcasey Drazak Killingtime(but I am watching him with a 10 foot pole) Kreb This leaves Stutters Kville xatalos and kush just now (who I am becoming aware of) Looking at this list kush defends stutters by avoiding talking about him (see drazaks post) this also leaves us seeing xatalos semi defending stutters. Kville is nowhere. See with a list like this town and scum you can see the links. A kush stutters xalalos team could be the answer. I would vote stutters instead of kville as if we vote kville we get nothing from he flip but you can see what we would gain from a stutters flip. HOWEVER stutters just posted turning my thoughts to confusion. To be open I will post this the way it was going to be but including stuff referring to the stutters thing. He says we won’t gain from a stutters flip if he flips town. If he flips scum however we would gain everything. So he says lynch killing. If killing flips mafia then I am probably confirmed town “yay” but if he flips green town town will instant lynch me. Which if stutters is mafia would win the game. Also would like to point out that a lynch on kville reveals nothing as well. Associative cases are pretty bad I must admit but they can provide a little information. Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 17:15 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: 3. Why were you attacking KillingTimes though? Please explain the reason you've been attacking him all game and what it was in his postings that made you think he looks more town now.
Btw it's really easy to slip away from questions by not quoting the post you're replying to, so please reply to these questions. I was attacking killingtime because he seemed to be ignoring the things I said about him in favour of just posting reads. The reason I town read you is you seem to have responded better initially so I temporarily town read you. I was getting frustrated as his semi avoidant approach however as the game went on he started replying in a manner that I would expect. The reason I attacked you and killing time so much is I realised you both thought in the same manner so 1. If you were both mafia we were screwed unless I could force you to make a slip early. 2. By attacking him I could have more to look at 3. If I could confirm you guys town it would make scum hunting so much easier. It wasn’t so much about scum slips you had made (I was just nitpicking) it was about forcing the two most scary people. Into a situation they probably would. Part of the reason I think he is town now is I haven’t found anything unusual in his postings. (Apart from a growing annoyance of me which is to be expected and I apologise for) Although there might be something in stutters case just now. Drazak seems to be having the same idea Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 18:05 drazak wrote: Accusations are how you gain information, you pressure people, find out what they're thinking, see how they react. I was pressured; generally you guys decided my reaction was town. I pressured kush and he scumslipped and you're not doing anything, wow. Although just a note kush is known for overreaction for no apparent reason. Yeah I understand, I was just really short for time at the time and wanted to get a post in reply up. On a side note how long till lynch? I think the night period messed up my internal clock.
First and foremost I didn't say vote KillingTime. I want him to explain his lack of real contribution despite his long posts. This is exactly what I was talking about with lists. I'm not convinced he's scum but I want him to explain his non-committal attitude. You appear active and its a good guise to hide behind. I'm having a hard time understanding the rest of your points but I'll try to address them.
When I flip town all you gain is that KillingTime pushed my lynch. This alone doesn't guarantee he's scum. You need to focus on the motivations behind posts. He could be a misguided townie which hands scum the game. If Killing gets lynched because of my post and he's town and they lynch me because of it and I'm Mafia, Mafia doesn't win the game. With a mislynch today we're at 5/3 which makes it mylo tomorrow. So if they lynched me and I'm mafia they're at 4/2 and still at mylo. There is no way this can be a powerplay from a scum me to ensure scum wins tonight.
A lynch on Kville reveals nothing major either, true. But what it does is ensure that if he's town we don't have an idle town causing doubts during mylos for the rest of the game. That's what happened in Mini III and eventually they lynched him and cost them the game. There is also precedent in NMM for scum this bad (Thrawn mentions it in the post Kreb quoted).
|
Edit: This, however, does put you in worse light. There isnt much to respond to?
|
On September 06 2012 19:53 Kreb wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 19:42 Stutters695 wrote: Townreads are worthless. I'd rather suspect everyone who isn't confirmed rather than risk having a "town feel" on someone and completely overlook a scumslip because they're townie to me. It also gives the scum a grasp on where they sit in relation to everyone else. Very good time to reveal your disdain for townreads I must say. But very well. I could argue about your claims being bad, but I cant really argue about whether you truly believe what you say or make it up. So this didnt put you in a worse spot to me. Not better either though, as it was a very standard reply from what you'd expect. Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 19:42 Stutters695 wrote: I work 30-40 hours a week and am a full time student in my Junior year. Trying to explain why I'm not here isn't really relevant when if you believe that is determined by if you believe I'm town or not. Same here really. Cant double check what you do IRL. Standard reply. Neither putting you in a better nor worse light. Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 19:42 Stutters695 wrote: There really isn't much to respond to on Thrawn's case. He felt I was more scummy than Cubu, obviously I know I'm not. I'm giving you my best reads right now, there isn't much more I can do than that. This, however, does put you in worse light. There is much to respond? Why on earth would a townie not feel the need to respond to accusation?!?! And you are not giving me your best read s, you're giving us a read on KillingTime. Singular. And yes, there is certainly more things you could do. Overall score: -1 to your towncred for the last part good Sir.
Please explain what is great about giving townreads? I have no reason currently to suspect you're scum but lets assume you were. Everyone in the game comes out as a town read on you and now you know you're in a position of leadership and can probably lead a mislynch/maybe two without really risking yourself. That isn't pro-town. Town reads do nothing except provide an easy way for people to contribute without actually saying anything of value. Check my previous game where I'm town, there's not a single town-read until mylo where we had to make assumptions. If you can give me a good reason to share them I gladly will but I can't see one.
There isn't much to respond to regarding Thrawn. He felt I was more scummy than Cubu because the other townies were giving me too much credit for a more intelligent style of posting and that doesn't equate to being more town. I agree with that. However I didn't have time to post a bunch of cases day 1. I can't change that now so that is completely up to the person how the view my day 1. I'm attempting to fix that now. Like I've been saying all game your reads should be based off of motivations, not associations or minor things you find suspicious. You should pressure them for suspicious lines but to lynch someone off of one or two is foolish after day 1 (when there is significantly more to build off of).
Regarding my read on KillingTown other than Kville who I've made my thoughts clear I don't like KillingTown's completely noncommittal play so far. I'm trying to post other reads but when I have to answer 3 people drilling questions into every response I have I haven't had time to stop and figure out what I want to ask my other top reads.
|
Hi, i just got home from school, reading trough threads and making a good post before EOD
|
Ok so a little less than 14 hours until lynch time, and our suspicions are still everywhere... Please table the talk about possible scumteams. I have been guilty of doing this kind of thinking myself, but I agree it is useless until one flips scum. Keep it to yourself until then.
When I list a few people who I want the town to focus on I'm not trying to divert attention away from others. I'm just trying to help the town. Who is it today? Xatalos and stutters? And maybe myself since drazzak has an epic hard on for me lately? Can we at least get a preliminary vote? Waiting until the last second to bandwagon someone isn't a bad strategy, because it forces scum to act fast, but I don't think it's doable with all these eurofags. ##vote xatalos NB this is not my final vote...
|
On September 06 2012 03:39 imcasey wrote: Im trying my best on reading myself up and contribute with some good content, i feel im getting a better view now and i feel im not as hot as i were before my first post where i suspected kushm4sta as people see i try to contribute, only reason iv been suspected is because of teewee`s actions or non actions before i stepped in.
I dont understand why you are attacking me so much xatalos You are saying I don't think I've ever said that WeeTee was much more likely Mafia than Stutters695
some sentence later you are saying :
imcasey just feels a bit more suspect (based on WeeTee's seriously suspicious approach of giving only neutral and slight town reads behind fluffy walls of text)
Also looking trough your filter, your saying : It's so very easy to say things like "I'll post something useful closer to the deadline". As Mafia, it's the perfect situation: you can observe the thread and then start pushing someone who would have been lynched anyway
looking at what you said in your last post :
I'll be reading filters and hopefully coming to some new findings before morning.
I think you played well, but you lost track of all your bluffing, i think you are mafia.
Seriously ? I feel i have a solid case here, and not a single one of you have replied to anything of what i wrote. I encourage everyone to read my post again, is it only me that think iv got a pretty solid case here ? I am sure Xatalos is mafia and he will be my vote.
Other people i am suspicios about :
Kville
Few post`s, none of them contributing. Seems to just be lurking, Kville you need to come with some contributing post`s and be more active.
Townread
JacobStrangelove
He is active, write post with good content, not afraid to share his thoughts or get in a fight. Very townie for me.
#Vote Xatalos
|
On September 06 2012 20:07 Stutters695 wrote: Please explain what is great about giving townreads? Putting the answer in spoilers again because I consider the benefit/drawback discussion of townreads to be kinda off topic for the purpose of scumhunting. Especially with limited time left until D2 lynch.
+ Show Spoiler +-By giving townreads you show that you actively think about who is town and mafia, which mafia obviously doesnt have to do because they already know everything. -Its also a committal, by sharing your reads you show that you are willing to share your opinions of other and that you are open to people questioning these reads. A mafia would love to be able to sit silent and not commit to any (or as few as possible) reads. -Not to mention the fact that as a townie you wanna confirm as many other townies as possible. Both because then you know you can trust these players' motives and trust their opinions to be genuine, and also of course because instead of having to guess the mafia players among all active players, you can eliminate a few a and focus on the remaining when scumhunting. -It might help people if you die. If I die but people use my reads to finish the game in favor of town, thats awesome.
Feel free to reply to any of these points. I'd prefer if you did it in spoilers to not turn it into a discussion. No matter if you reply to this or not, I wont reply to it more. My take on townreads shouldnt really be a matter of discussion when we're in it for the scumhunting.
|
On September 06 2012 20:53 Kreb wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 20:07 Stutters695 wrote: Please explain what is great about giving townreads? Putting the answer in spoilers again because I consider the benefit/drawback discussion of townreads to be kinda off topic for the purpose of scumhunting. Especially with limited time left until D2 lynch. + Show Spoiler +-By giving townreads you show that you actively think about who is town and mafia, which mafia obviously doesnt have to do because they already know everything. -Its also a committal, by sharing your reads you show that you are willing to share your opinions of other and that you are open to people questioning these reads. A mafia would love to be able to sit silent and not commit to any (or as few as possible) reads. -Not to mention the fact that as a townie you wanna confirm as many other townies as possible. Both because then you know you can trust these players' motives and trust their opinions to be genuine, and also of course because instead of having to guess the mafia players among all active players, you can eliminate a few a and focus on the remaining when scumhunting. -It might help people if you die. If I die but people use my reads to finish the game in favor of town, thats awesome.
Feel free to reply to any of these points. I'd prefer if you did it in spoilers to not turn it into a discussion. No matter if you reply to this or not, I wont reply to it more. My take on townreads shouldnt really be a matter of discussion when we're in it for the scumhunting.
+ Show Spoiler +I actually like the committal part. Hadn't really accounted for that. Although I still don't think its a strong as scum reads because its much easier for a questionable post to drop someone's town-cred than it is to gain it so these are much easier to back off of.
Most people I honestly have doubts about but I've got a strong town read on you due to your incessant questioning and not backing down until you've made up your mind. Without a doubt the most pro-town player so far d2.
I've got a slight town read on Sonic Death Monkey and Jacob but I would have to reread filters and double check. Those are more from an overview than scrutiny. I'm tired as hell at the moment so I'll go more into that when I wake up.
My current top 4 reads:
Kville - Adressed before. I think keeping him in is a mistake longterm. Currently he's my number 1 vote.
KillingTime - See my previous posts. Currently my number 2 read. Need to hear his responses before I'm sold however.
Kush - I need to reread the cases on him and his filter but I really want to see an answer to this post of drazak:
On September 06 2012 17:28 drazak wrote:Alright, I was afk most of the day. First I'd like to point something out about Kush's posting behavior, he tries to downplay my accusations, and say that my case is bad, deciding that there is almost no case against him in his first responding post. Kush goes on to make /4/ posts responding to my accusation and then accusing me. In his posts, he either delays replying to me, which if my argument is weak, makes no sense, it should be simple to pick apart. In the meantime, I've been afk and have made 0. This seems like a bit over an overreaction if he's innocent and my accusation is weak. + Show Spoiler +- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133744
- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133615
- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16144834
- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16140589
You sir, have made a big slip, every time you're accused you throw it right back at your accuser, this is the weakest of the defenses, espescially when your case is weak. I urge the rest of the town to actually look at my arguments, instead of dismissing them as a weak case, look through kush's filter, and the posts I've described and linked, he's made a large scumslip here, at first my accusations were fairly tenative due to having only moderate evidence, but instead of his defense making my case weaker, he's made it stronger. P.S. sorry for taking so long to post, was going to hours ago and then had dinner with a friend, when I got home I had other stuff to do on my other pc, and then fell asleep for a little after I got my laptop out.
Additionally, I don't care who you think the town has a consensus on for possible lynch candidates today. If you had to consolidate the town votes onto 3 people who would your third be and why?
Xatalos - Easily my 4th although him and Kush are interchangable for the most part in order. Xatalos spends all of his time defending and not actually finding scum. He's mia, promising explanations for his vote on imcasey and cubu but not providing. I'm currently not sure if I believe that he has 0 time because of the military. I need to look into this more but its very suspicious to me at the moment.
Anyway that said I need to go to bed for a bit. I'll be back somewhere between 9-5 hours from lynch depending on when I wake up and take care of some errands. I'll definitely be here before lynchtime though.
Currently though my best vote is without a doubt on Kville
##Vote Kville
|
On September 06 2012 20:50 imcasey wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 03:39 imcasey wrote: Im trying my best on reading myself up and contribute with some good content, i feel im getting a better view now and i feel im not as hot as i were before my first post where i suspected kushm4sta as people see i try to contribute, only reason iv been suspected is because of teewee`s actions or non actions before i stepped in.
I dont understand why you are attacking me so much xatalos You are saying I don't think I've ever said that WeeTee was much more likely Mafia than Stutters695
some sentence later you are saying :
imcasey just feels a bit more suspect (based on WeeTee's seriously suspicious approach of giving only neutral and slight town reads behind fluffy walls of text)
Also looking trough your filter, your saying : It's so very easy to say things like "I'll post something useful closer to the deadline". As Mafia, it's the perfect situation: you can observe the thread and then start pushing someone who would have been lynched anyway
looking at what you said in your last post :
I'll be reading filters and hopefully coming to some new findings before morning.
I think you played well, but you lost track of all your bluffing, i think you are mafia. Seriously ? I feel i have a solid case here, and not a single one of you have replied to anything of what i wrote. I encourage everyone to read my post again, is it only me that think iv got a pretty solid case here ? I am sure Xatalos is mafia and he will be my vote. You do have a point he used a phrase which he previously said he considered scummy. However, a point doesnt equal a good case. To me, you're drawing way too big conclusions based off a small point. Cases are made with throughout reasoning and multiple points. You're putting too much weight on this one read.
Your wording also supports this. You say you are "sure Xatalos is mafia". And you only offer one point before you come to the conclusion. Thats not really critical thinking. I could probably find similar miss-steps in writing among most players here if I really wanted. Hell, I've offered quite extensive cases and I'm doubtful if I'd go as far as to say Im "sure" of anything.
In short: Make your cases more extensive. Theres nothing wrong with your point (actually, I do agree its with the point, its a bit wierd he used something he said himself is scummy), but overall I wouldnt call your case strong at all.
|
@imcasey
On September 06 2012 20:50 imcasey wrote: I am sure Xatalos is mafia and he will be my vote.
I get that you are new but saying something like that is absurd. It's impossible to be sure.
|
OK people I think we can agree should not be brought up before lynch, simply because it's a waste of time since these people are never going to be lynched in 13 hours: Killingtime Sonic Jacob Kreb I would also like to add myself to this list but seems biased to do so.
I think killing's filter does look suspicious and we should resume discussion of him tomorrow.
|
On September 06 2012 21:01 Stutters695 wrote:Kush - I need to reread the cases on him and his filter but I really want to see an answer to this post of drazak:Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 17:28 drazak wrote:Alright, I was afk most of the day. First I'd like to point something out about Kush's posting behavior, he tries to downplay my accusations, and say that my case is bad, deciding that there is almost no case against him in his first responding post. Kush goes on to make /4/ posts responding to my accusation and then accusing me. In his posts, he either delays replying to me, which if my argument is weak, makes no sense, it should be simple to pick apart. In the meantime, I've been afk and have made 0. This seems like a bit over an overreaction if he's innocent and my accusation is weak. + Show Spoiler +- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133744
- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133615
- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16144834
- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16140589
You sir, have made a big slip, every time you're accused you throw it right back at your accuser, this is the weakest of the defenses, espescially when your case is weak. I urge the rest of the town to actually look at my arguments, instead of dismissing them as a weak case, look through kush's filter, and the posts I've described and linked, he's made a large scumslip here, at first my accusations were fairly tenative due to having only moderate evidence, but instead of his defense making my case weaker, he's made it stronger. P.S. sorry for taking so long to post, was going to hours ago and then had dinner with a friend, when I got home I had other stuff to do on my other pc, and then fell asleep for a little after I got my laptop out. OK stutters. So drazzak's argument here, which you can read yourself, I can summarize as thus: I say his argument is weak then I take 4 posts to defend it. Also I accuse him which makes me scum because accusing your attacker is bad defence. my reply: I still think your attack on me was bad, and if you look for closely I only put up 1 defence post for each of your attack posts. You say you were afk and had 0 posts in between my 4 posts, but that is incorrect. You have 2 substantially lengthed posts and I made 1 post each in defense of those.
[*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133744 This was my post in defense of your first post.
[*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16133615 This had nothing to do with you. It was just talking about how we need a plan and to stay focused day 2.
[*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16144834 This is not a defense. It is actually just suspicion of you. Yes I am suspicious of you and yes that is partly because you accused me. However my suspicions of you honestly are not that strong. I hope you are town and I hope I get lynched just so you can see how bad of a player you are. I think you are really bad at this game also you piss me off. ANYWAY moving on.
[*]http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=16140589 the 4th post you bring up is another defense, but that is actually in response to another, separate attacking post from you, which I quote in my post. You were not afk across those 4 posts.
Also i did not attack you as my defense. Actually I tried to keep my posts attacking you (which their haven't been much of) and my arguments for defense separate.
@Stutters does that satisfy you or is there something else?
|
Also can people please focus on those who have a possibility of getting lynched today! Drazzak and stutters and whoever if you have suspicions of me can it wait until night? Because honestly I don't think a bandwagon on me at this point is even possible.
|
|
|
|