EPTAge of Empires: The Age of Kings Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Sir Posts A Lot
Congo42 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 26 2012 00:12 Sir Posts A Lot wrote: /in Smurfs ahoy! | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
SHOCKS AND AWES | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On July 26 2012 05:59 rastaban wrote: What exactly is hydraing, is it where two people play the same role in a faction game? 2 people play on 1 account, so 1 role. I have no idea what is going on in AOE but the setup looks so damn interesting, so I think I would be worthless by myself. Therefore I asked Gonzaw if he would let me play alongside him. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On July 26 2012 07:17 Mattchew wrote: 2 people play on 1 account, so 1 role. I have no idea what is going on in AOE but the setup looks so damn interesting, so I think I would be worthless by myself. Therefore I asked Gonzaw if he would let me play alongside him. I don't know much about AoE either  I think I only played AoE 2 a couple of times doing some shit, so I know the basics, but I know 0 strategies and stuff since I never even played the story campaigns till the end or anything . But meh I'm sure both of us can figure something out At worst we'll be worthless and people will have pity on us and let us live until the end of the game | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On July 26 2012 07:39 gonzaw wrote: I don't know much about AoE either I think I only played AoE 2 a couple of times doing some shit, so I know the basics, but I know 0 strategies and stuff since I never even played the story campaigns till the end or anything . But meh I'm sure both of us can figure something out At worst we'll be worthless and people will have pity on us and let us live until the end of the game e=mc2 trooper all you ever need | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5248 Posts
I didn't think a setup could be more intense than MTG | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
Questions: What happens when a player wins? Say there's three players left, A, B, and C. A is allied to both B and C. B and C are not allied to each other. That means player A has 'won'. So, does he just get removed, or does he get to keep playing after he's won, or how does that work? Can I break the game by having everyone ally with everyone else at the beginning of the game and start some kind of happy commune? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On July 27 2012 01:30 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Hmmmm, I might need to sign up for this. Questions: What happens when a player wins? Say there's three players left, A, B, and C. A is allied to both B and C. B and C are not allied to each other. That means player A has 'won'. So, does he just get removed, or does he get to keep playing after he's won, or how does that work? Can I break the game by having everyone ally with everyone else at the beginning of the game and start some kind of happy commune? I like the way you're thinking. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/yMrae.jpg) That's my plan this game. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 27 2012 01:30 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Hmmmm, I might need to sign up for this. Questions: What happens when a player wins? Say there's three players left, A, B, and C. A is allied to both B and C. B and C are not allied to each other. That means player A has 'won'. So, does he just get removed, or does he get to keep playing after he's won, or how does that work? Can I break the game by having everyone ally with everyone else at the beginning of the game and start some kind of happy commune? Remember alliances are capped at 4 players, so that would be impossible. However, the game will end immediately after a player achieves his wincondition. If multiple players (e.g. Same alliance) achieve that win condition then they all win. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
Love these more complex games, and can spend a lot more time on it than the MTG game. And i will not be replaced, of course. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
On July 27 2012 05:57 wherebugsgo wrote: Remember alliances are capped at 4 players, so that would be impossible. However, the game will end immediately after a player achieves his wincondition. If multiple players (e.g. Same alliance) achieve that win condition then they all win. Ok, when you say alliances are capped at four people, does that mean I can only have four people in every mutual alliance, or that I can only ally myself to four people in total? | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 27 2012 06:39 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Ok, when you say alliances are capped at four people, does that mean I can only have four people in every mutual alliance, or that I can only ally myself to four people in total? You can make 3 requests. Every request that is reciprocated becomes an alliance between the consenters. You can make larger alliances basically if all members have mutual requests among each other, but that is likewise capped at 4 (because of the request limit) If you have 5 players: A B C D E and A is allied to B and C is allied to A, then A has to kill both D and E whereas B has to kill C, D, E and C has to kill B, D, E. In other words you may have to kill the ally of an ally in order to fulfill your win condition (and this may result in them turning on you! who knows... | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I will not be replaced. I've read the rules twice and I still have no idea what's going on :D | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
 I'll definitely be around a lot to help people out (as will my cohosts) | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18100 Posts
 Good luck and if you need a replacement sometime in the middle of next week, hit me up (because nobody ever pays any attention to your /in warning stuff)! | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 27 2012 10:48 wherebugsgo wrote: it's not as complex as it looks I'll definitely be around a lot to help people out (as will my cohosts) I love the contradiction in these 2 lines | ||
| ||
