• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:20
CET 22:20
KST 06:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners8Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon!33$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship6[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win9
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon! Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BW General Discussion [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1615 users

Newbie Mini Mafia IX - Page 10

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 33 Next All
risk.nuke
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden2825 Posts
April 16 2012 12:53 GMT
#181
A warning for Four Face. Smurf accounts MUST ask permission and recive clearance from the host to be allowed.
Neo.G Soulkey, Best, firebathero. // http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31
Pure-SC2
Profile Joined November 2011
United Kingdom1440 Posts
April 16 2012 13:06 GMT
#182
On April 16 2012 21:20 Daymor wrote:
EBWOP:

@ Pure-SC2

I probably should have included this in my last post also. But another post from Nova that is bugging me is;
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2012 02:11 Nova_Terra wrote:
What now? Why would i not swap off of a pressure vote when the idea was to get that person to post? are you trying to tell me i should do exactly what i did as scum last game and be like, MEH, He posted, but i want to lynch him anyway? That hardly makes sense. Also, Lynching a lurker provides benefits like being able to see who voted when, peoples stances, and more importantly it sets an expectation that people who lurk will die. as an incentive to post.
There isnt positive reinforcement on this game. If you lurk, you die. if you're active, you still might die, but at least you'll be helpful to the town first.

First of all I have no idea as to who this post was aimed at, maybe Therapist? But to me this post gives me a bad vibe. It seems like quite an aggressive defense (in particular the first two lines), and the tone seems that of exasperation or aggression.

I don't think you mentioned the post in your case, but what kind of impression does that post leave you with?


Thanks for highlighting this Daymor, I did read the post when I did my filter review, but as I wasn't reading it "in-line" with the thread, I didn't look at the context, just the tone. And the tone is very defensive.

After a review, I believe this post was in response to TheRavensName, who pointed out that he thought Nova was rather lynch happy - which at that point was 100% true as he was "pressure" voting without actually adding anything himself (part of the 14 initial posts he made which I commented on in my initial case against Nova).

His response to this doesn't calmly state the nature of his pressure voting, but is a very defensive post and again he relates it back to the fact that he was scum in a previous game and how he's playing it different this time.

This just adds to my initial suspicions.
"Every time I visit community sites, I'm just embarrassed. There's so much witch hunting and name calling and arguing and gossip. Misogynist comments against women. It's just embarrassing." – Tasteless
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 13:41 GMT
#183
And yes, That was a response to TheRavensName.

Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
oneplus
Profile Joined October 2010
Malaysia34 Posts
April 16 2012 14:32 GMT
#184
Pure and Daymore has bring out what I am trying to say but I didnt give enough evidence due to my english.

Lorant is right about english is not my mother tongue so I try to explain everything in a simple way and hope everyone can understand it.

I feel that lazer vote on nova is very questionable, the way you change your vote is too sudden. But this is a good move, if you both are scum after you lynch your scummate, you will earn 100% trust from the town.

Now everyone has started to review post and analyzise more after I make my view on Nova, when I am the only one against him he sound like everything i said doesn't make sense at all but now when there is more and more people agasint him, he started to apologize and try to agree with each others. I would like to explain in this way "he is someone in the platinum league but try to act like he is a grandmaster but now he retract and saying actually he is a platinum"
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 14:51 GMT
#185
What? where did i apologize and agree with others... And how did this turn into me trying to act better than i am.....
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 14:52 GMT
#186
Once again looks like you are trying to make me look more suspicious. Not impressed.
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Pure-SC2
Profile Joined November 2011
United Kingdom1440 Posts
April 16 2012 15:07 GMT
#187
An interesting post Nova. I've taken some time to go through it and see how it relates to my case against you.

The comments I made about your posts before the game started were expanded on in my EBWOP. They are applicable because you were already trying to distance yourself from your previous mafia roles, which is fine. But, then you continued using that same approach once the game started which immediately rang scummy to me.

You haven't claimed to be a town leader, but from the outset of the day you placed yourself as the post monitor, telling us who was posting fluff, and how hard you were going to be on them, re-iterating the lack of activity (without contributing). That comes across to me as someone who is trying a little too hard to appear active. You already have my thoughts on that.

Regarding your comment towards oneplus:
Oneplus posted no real reason to suspect me that was good.

That sounds a lot like you in regards to your suspicious of Solohan50, don't you think? We're still waiting for this insightful explanation as to why his first post was scummy.

I've re-read oneplus's filter and agree with the assessment made by Lorant, that oneplus obviously doesn't speak english natively and as such his posts take a bit more reading. Even so, I can see that he does provide some reasoning as to why he suspects you:
- Notes that Lazer and Nova are very firm to lynch someone
- Picks up on the fact that Nova constantly refers to mafia role in previous games
- Highlights Novas over reactive defensive posting to his suspicions
- Picks up on the association between Nova and Lazer that I noticed also.

* This is significantly more reasoning than you've given for your suspicions against Solohan50.


Also, sick connection case. Nothing quite like suspecting people because they share a similar view in early game.

It's not just a similar view, Lazer (and to a lesser extent Crossfire) supported you in your suspicions of Solohan50 without one shred of reasoning, just like you. Rather than offer any reasoning as to why you think there is no association between you, or even offering your reasoning for suspicions on Solohan, you take a further defensive stance without offering anything.

At this stage, I don't have a scum read on Crossfire, only noted the association. I'll be looking at Lazer more closely as he has several things in his filter now that tend towards scum.


Also, When did this go from lynching Lurkers to voting for people who actually contribute and provoke discussion? because you cant disagree that voting for someone who is creating discussion is a terrible idea with the state of the current town.

For me, this occurred when I was able to build a case I had a reasonably high level of confidence in. Which is quite a sensible approach if you think about it.

And voting for someone who is suspicious (for several reasons) is a great idea if you have that read on day 1.

Using the fact that you've created discussion as a reason not to lynch you is not a defence.


Also i love how everyone is jumping on the sick bandwagon. really good play

This just sounds anti-town to me.

I reviewed everyone's filter, and when I looked at my notes afterwards, I had you as the most suspicious based on the reasons already stated. I noticed that in the time I'd put that together, Oneplus and Daymor has posted a similar read.
"Every time I visit community sites, I'm just embarrassed. There's so much witch hunting and name calling and arguing and gossip. Misogynist comments against women. It's just embarrassing." – Tasteless
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 15:23 GMT
#188
On April 17 2012 00:07 Pure-SC2 wrote:
An interesting post Nova. I've taken some time to go through it and see how it relates to my case against you.

The comments I made about your posts before the game started were expanded on in my EBWOP. They are applicable because you were already trying to distance yourself from your previous mafia roles, which is fine. But, then you continued using that same approach once the game started which immediately rang scummy to me.

You haven't claimed to be a town leader, but from the outset of the day you placed yourself as the post monitor, telling us who was posting fluff, and how hard you were going to be on them, re-iterating the lack of activity (without contributing). That comes across to me as someone who is trying a little too hard to appear active. You already have my thoughts on that.

Regarding your comment towards oneplus:
Show nested quote +
Oneplus posted no real reason to suspect me that was good.

That sounds a lot like you in regards to your suspicious of Solohan50, don't you think? We're still waiting for this insightful explanation as to why his first post was scummy.

I've re-read oneplus's filter and agree with the assessment made by Lorant, that oneplus obviously doesn't speak english natively and as such his posts take a bit more reading. Even so, I can see that he does provide some reasoning as to why he suspects you:
- Notes that Lazer and Nova are very firm to lynch someone
- Picks up on the fact that Nova constantly refers to mafia role in previous games
- Highlights Novas over reactive defensive posting to his suspicions
- Picks up on the association between Nova and Lazer that I noticed also.

* This is significantly more reasoning than you've given for your suspicions against Solohan50.


Show nested quote +
Also, sick connection case. Nothing quite like suspecting people because they share a similar view in early game.

It's not just a similar view, Lazer (and to a lesser extent Crossfire) supported you in your suspicions of Solohan50 without one shred of reasoning, just like you. Rather than offer any reasoning as to why you think there is no association between you, or even offering your reasoning for suspicions on Solohan, you take a further defensive stance without offering anything.

At this stage, I don't have a scum read on Crossfire, only noted the association. I'll be looking at Lazer more closely as he has several things in his filter now that tend towards scum.


Show nested quote +
Also, When did this go from lynching Lurkers to voting for people who actually contribute and provoke discussion? because you cant disagree that voting for someone who is creating discussion is a terrible idea with the state of the current town.

For me, this occurred when I was able to build a case I had a reasonably high level of confidence in. Which is quite a sensible approach if you think about it.

And voting for someone who is suspicious (for several reasons) is a great idea if you have that read on day 1.

Using the fact that you've created discussion as a reason not to lynch you is not a defence.


Show nested quote +
Also i love how everyone is jumping on the sick bandwagon. really good play

This just sounds anti-town to me.

I reviewed everyone's filter, and when I looked at my notes afterwards, I had you as the most suspicious based on the reasons already stated. I noticed that in the time I'd put that together, Oneplus and Daymor has posted a similar read.

Okay, so yes, i know that oneplus probably not native english speaker. I have explained the think about wanting to lynch someone multiple times now. He highlights my defensive posting? I called OMGUS on him because he OMGUS'ed. Suddenly i have a defensive reaction. Hit too close to home, did i? Call out a defensive reaction because i truthfully point something out. Also the association between me and Lazer is a result of that OMGUS in his eyes, as well as the fact that we agreed with eachother. Do you know how often people reference other mafia members on day 1 in a newbie game? not often. Therefore it is WIFOM to speculate on a connection case right now, especially in this situation. However, it may be true that Lazer and Crossfire jumped on a potentially weak player in Solohan, but that is unrelated to me except for the fact that i brought up solohan to begin with.
The fact that i have provoked discussion is a perfect way to defend myself on day 1, when this many players have said that they want a lurker lynch AND when its completely truthful.
And yeah, im being sarcastic and cynical. Pretty much because im mad and i find a lot of this bandwagoning annoying.
And as he isnt posting, i'll be voting Solohan50. I never said that i think he is scum for sure or anything, just that the posts were scummy. However, as he is not responding, i will be going for him.
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 15:24 GMT
#189
Also the fact that Pure brought up a long analysis like this kinda makes me think that he isnt scum. but thats just a partial read. leaning town for him slightly.
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 15:25 GMT
#190
##Unvote
##Vote: Solohan50
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
April 16 2012 15:26 GMT
#191
In response to Lorant:

The reason why I think solo is a little suspicious is because he hasn't said much, but with those few words he has said, he has tacitly supported a no lynch by saying + Show Spoiler +
My analysis is based on the Mafia guide that I've been reading which says that lynching Town members generally doesn't give much information. This would be doubly true if we lynch a lurker who hasn't said much, because there's no information about that person. The whole point of the post was to encourage people to post more, so we can avoid having to lynch a lurker. In my eyes, unless we get lucky and the lurker is Mafia, we benefit very little and we're down one more player.
. I disagree with his argument (as well as some others in this thread), hence my two posts saying why we should lynch day 1. If you believe that I jumped to conclusions about him, I disagree. All I did was say that I was only slightly suspicious, which I is why I didn't vote for him.

Now I am curious about you, though. Why vote for me when it seems that you thought lazer or nova was more suspicious? You also say that your entire argument is based on a gut feeling. + Show Spoiler +
On April 16 2012 17:33 Lorant wrote:
This suspicion on Crossfire is mainly coming from my gut
I haven't played this game before, but I still know what bad arguments look like. All you did was try to fit my words into your preconceived notion that I am scum. Looking at your post you said that my no lynch talk and my very polite GL HF, were both essentially null, so that leaves your suspicions of me completely resting on that fact that I am a little suspicious of solo. I have explained that above, so I would like to hear your response to my question.
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 15:32 GMT
#192
On April 15 2012 00:46 Solohan50 wrote:
Yeah, lynching lurkers isn't a terrible idea (it's not spectacular either though), especially if you make it known ahead of time. That (should) inspire everyone to post at least a little bit, giving us more information on Day 1 and hopefully leading to better lynches. With any luck though, everyone will be active and we can avoid having to lynch a lurker. If the lurker that gets lynched Day 1 is Town, then we gain almost no information, because they haven't posted anything.

tl:dr Post, people!

As i am voting for him anyway and theres no reason not to as i am voting for him, heres why i found his 1st post suspicious.
Okay, so first, Solohan50 does not present an opinion that is clear and to the point. you cant even tell really if he does support lynching lurkers because of it. The main think in this post is the presence of all the parts i highlighted red. Note how he continuously adds things to make his post seem agreeable and something he can fall back on later. It seems as if he is trying to play so that he cant be suspected for his opinions because he notes how it also isnt good. Trying to be Mister Agreeable is scummy. Also, this post is pretty much recycled opinions from other people.
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 15:41 GMT
#193
On April 16 2012 15:35 Lazermonkey wrote:
Morning everyone!

So I wake up, read the thread and tbh I'm quite dissapointed in the progress made during the night. We are getting nowhere atm. We really need to stop discuss the possibility of no lynches.

Show nested quote +
I would also like to add, that although the discussion regarding lynch v no lynch may not mean anything if indeed you cannot vote for a no lynch. It does however provide the opportunity for people to comment and add their perspective as to what they feel about the policy. This provides us with information which we can analyse nd to help show the motivation and logic behind their arguements. So it is far from fruitless.


I agree with you, but this would only occur if everyone had posted really good opinions and cases. We aren't even close to that point right now. The following effects of a no lynch atm would probebly be something in line with:

1. Noone is lynched
2. Mafia most likely get a kill since there is such a small chance that the roleblocker/jailer would hit the right target due to little information.
3. The killed target townie and is a lurker/person who only posted that no lynch is a good opinion.
4. No info is have been archived.

Show nested quote +
On April 16 2012 11:16 oneplus wrote:
Sorry guys i was busy, finally i am able to catch up the thread.
Well I am the first one to come out with the no lynch idea, let me explain abit about this. It would be a bit suspicious about me to come out with this but no lynch it's not no pressure for the scums we could see some potential scums coming out and want to lynch some townie in day 1 or he might be happy for no lynch in day 1 and try to go for a no lynch since they will be able to kill at night. From here we might get some information hence no lynch doesn't mean no information at all and it is bad.

##VOTE : No lynch


I'm not sure if noob or scum, but This has been said over 9000 times in this thread. Please post something new...

Also im working on a brief post analysis on Lazer but i have to note
small chance that the roleblocker/jailer would hit the right target

Scum slip scum slip, says that we have a Roleblocker! Not a town role everybody!
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 15:41 GMT
#194
And, If you people still think the fact that my reaction to oneplus is very defensive, look at lazers and tell me that i was very defensive.
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 15:47 GMT
#195
I find Lorant/FourFace to be not very suspicious as he is currently still avoiding an "easy" bandwagon. Which makes sense if you are town.
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 16:00 GMT
#196
On April 16 2012 21:19 Lazermonkey wrote:
Wow, that is some really nice analysis, Pure! Here are my random thoughts about it

Up untill this point I was quite sure that Nova wasn't scum, but now I'm starting to question it. An aspect that I think that you havn't brought up is his early game. The one thing that reallty is Pro-town about him is that he really tried his best to get the discussion going. He did some pressures and tried to get the lurkers to speak. He also was very clear about that he didn't like any fluff, although it is true he have been posting lots of posts that havn't really addded anything at all. This could be explained by the fact that we all pretty much agreed upon that lynching lurkers would be possible on day 1 and that he tried to get immune to lynches the very first day be being active. So with that in mind I think that his early game plans isn't very telling. It could've been done outof both perspectives. I'm writing as I am thinking, which is why the text above at first looks very fluffy ^^. Still think it is nice to know.

As for Solohan50, The one thing I thought was that the 2 very short posts he actually made were basically echoing what everybody had said a dozen times before him. For me, this looked like a nice way to put some pressure at him and make him contribute and post some more material, rather than actually saying that he was 100% scum. As for Nova intention tho, I have no idea.

The only thing that is problematic with your post is how late it is. I know this could be because of a thousand reasons but it does in fact make a difference. To me, most of thoose reasons could be broke down into;

1)You are a townie/blue and just havn't had the time to post.
2)You are scum and want to protect your scum-bro macheji, who I think got the most votes atm(although that seems quite unlikely to me as you set him up on your list of lurkers of people that you are fine with lynching).
3)You are scum, macheji is a townie/blue but you would rather kill Nova as you see him as a bigger threat.

I think 1 is the most likely, but all should be considered.

Atm I think the most interesting lynch would in fact be Nova. Not because he is confirmed scum in any way, but because of the possible information we could be given. If he flips town, we really need to think about Pure intention with his post.

## Unvote
## Vote Nova_Terra

Seeing as this is an important post, i want to note a couple things i do not like about it.
You note a couple things in this post about my play that seem pro town, and you seem to want to go for an information lynch.
You do not vote for an active thought provoking player for information. you vote an active thought provoking player if you think they are scum. And that doesnt seem so much the case here as you are defending some things i do. With the current activity, if you mislynch me you lose a lot more than if you mislynch some lurker.
Wouldnt it be interesting if you KNEW i was townie, then made remarks slightly defending me to distance yourself from this lynch, still voted for the easy target without adding anything bad against him, Saw that me and him were being connected and then voted because he knew it would make him seem more town when i flipped, and then said that we would have to look into Pure more when i flip town?
Also, as a townie you dont suggest much about blues. You shouldnt. This looks almost like Blue Fishing, which is scummy.

Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 16:04 GMT
#197
sorry, instead of "me and him were being connected and then voted because he knew that it would make him seem" i mean Me and you were being connected and then voted because you knew it would make you seem. brainfart there
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Solohan50
Profile Joined March 2012
37 Posts
April 16 2012 16:17 GMT
#198
Sheesh, you Euros blew up this thread while I was asleep. :-O

After looking through some filters, we definitely have a fair amount of lurkers floating around. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if they're just busy people or if they're lurking in a scummy way. So far, the list appears to be:

Crossfire - 3 posts after the game has started, and all regarding Day 1 lynches. Hasn't contributed anything else though. He did post that he was unsure of how you lynch a person on Day 1 at the beginning of the game. His last two posts, however, had a much more confident tone about who and why we should lynch on Day 1. Is this scum that's playing coy, or did he just read up on the subject? Since it's a newbie game, I'm inclined to give him a pass on the change of tone (for now), and assume that he went out and read a Mafia guide or something.

Macheji - Hasn't posted in 2 days. Likely getting modkilled. Not much else to say since he hasn't posted anything.

BlueyD - Has 3 posts since the game started. Tacitly supports Nova based on information from previous games. Gets a little caught up on the No Lynch debate, but provides more analysis than most have.

TheRavensName - A handful of one-liner posts and a safe vote for the lurker who's likely to get modkilled (though to be fair, the modkill wasn't on the table until recently).

Oneplus - He's lurked to a lesser extent. He's come out of hiding in the last day and started becoming more active. Since Mecheji had more votes than oneplus did at the time oneplus reappeared, I'm inclined to say that the lurking wasn't a scumslip. If Oneplus had more votes than Mecheji at the time Oneplus returned, I would be more inclined to say that he started posting due to pressure, but that's not the case.

Therapist - Has only really posted about the No Lynch and hasn't posted since. I'd like to see him post more so I can get more of a feel on him. The confusion about the No Lynch is understandable, but it's hard to get a read when that's all he's posted about.

-----------------------------------

And then there's Nova. He decried spam and fluff posts at the beginning of the game, but a good portion of his posts have been one liners, such as:

On April 16 2012 19:35 Nova_Terra wrote:
LOL whaaaat?
and what is a FourFace doing in this thread o.o

On April 16 2012 19:39 Nova_Terra wrote:
FourFace, what N word?! Newbie? Did I? damn. just meant bad. apologies

On April 16 2012 21:47 Nova_Terra wrote:
Also i love how everyone is jumping on the sick bandwagon. really good play


He's also been overly aggressive and defensive, moreso than a Townie should be, even going so far as to say:

On April 16 2012 18:09 Nova_Terra wrote:
ROFL. Thats fine, dig your own grave.


I can't tell if that's a veiled threat or if Nova is just an asshole (or both?).

On top of that, his whole argument against me was an argument reminiscient of an old, married couple. I ask what I did wrong, and he responds with "You know what you did wrong!". Hyperbole aside, even after I replied, saying that I didn't know what he found wrong with my post, he continued with his line that he wanted to see what I said first. This seems like he was just trying to waste time with his accusation while not having to bother backing it up. He only started substantiating his argument against me once he had multiple votes on him, some of which stemmed from his accusations of me. This seems like he's being overly defensive and trying to save his own skin once his accusation got him in hot water. Because of this, I'm going to vote for Nova.

##Vote: Nova_Terra
Solohan50
Profile Joined March 2012
37 Posts
April 16 2012 16:20 GMT
#199
EBWOP - Looks like Crossfire ninja'd me while I was typing out that post. He replied to Lorant's vote against him.
Nova_Terra
Profile Joined March 2012
Switzerland1190 Posts
April 16 2012 16:24 GMT
#200
No, I posted a logical reason for posting my analysis of that when i did. And i find it funny that you post as soon as i make my vote and note why that post of yours was scummy.
Proud supporter of the Basking Rootwalla
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 33 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
LAN Event
18:00
Stellar Fest: Day 1
Zoun vs LamboLIVE!
TriGGeR vs GeraldLIVE!
ComeBackTV 734
UrsaTVCanada581
IndyStarCraft 289
CranKy Ducklings229
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 289
White-Ra 276
UpATreeSC 90
JuggernautJason68
Railgan 62
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 163
League of Legends
Trikslyr59
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps960
byalli315
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu423
Other Games
Grubby4034
tarik_tv2704
Beastyqt699
fl0m485
Mlord483
shahzam447
B2W.Neo395
ToD154
C9.Mang0106
QueenE56
ZombieGrub42
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL144
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 54
• Dystopia_ 2
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 17
• 80smullet 10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• imaqtpie2592
• TFBlade1179
Other Games
• Shiphtur233
• tFFMrPink 10
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
5h 40m
CranKy Ducklings
12h 40m
IPSL
20h 40m
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
LAN Event
20h 40m
BSL 21
22h 40m
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
1d 1h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 12h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 14h
IPSL
1d 20h
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
LAN Event
1d 20h
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
1d 22h
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.