TL Mafia L
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
L I think L is mafia in this game of Mafia L. Should help to remove confusion, provide a clear idea of which mafia this game is and annoy L. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:00 p4NDemik wrote: has this started yet? decided I'd like to play. This time "he" isn't in the game with us. -.- | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 13 2012 17:28 VisceraEyes wrote: ![]() Look around you. Go on, go back to page 1 and take a good long look at the player-list in this game. I'll wait. You'll see some familiar names, some you don't recognize, some you love playing with and some you hate playing with. You'll see seasoned veterans and raw newbies. You'll see professional e-sports figures and people fresh off super-secret-probation. This is possibly one of the most diverse player-lists since XLVII. With such a diverse cast of characters, do we really want the same ol' mayor calling the shots? It's time for a change. My name is VisceraEyes. Some of you might know me as 'that crazy guy who used to post insane nonsense but who has come back actually making sense at least half the time'. Others might know me as 'isn't he that guy who shot the GF on N1 of Election Mafia?' Still others of you may have never heard of me at all. It is for all of these reasons and more that I'm nominating myself for Mayor of Liquidia. "But VE, surely you jest! No one would follow you!" You have a point sir, but please allow me to explain. I don't intend to 'lead' the town. I intend to play the game as I always do - by being as open and transparent with my reads/thoughts as I can possibly be. I intend to lynch scum today, and I intend to relentlessly hunt for the remaining scum WITH town in the days to come. In this way, if town is interested in hunting scum, they have to follow me, because I'll already be doing that. It's called lead by example, and it's something the vets have forgotten about. "VE, surely you can see the merit of having a proven veteran of TLMafia as the mayor, right? At this point, no. In the games I've played, it seems to me like the vets are all mostly interested in surviving the first 2 night-kills (if they're town) before actually playing the game. I'm tired of electing someone into a position, only to have them waste it by lurking and throwing out random pro-town tidbits in an effort to avoid getting killed while they collect data. What does this serve to do? Get random players killed while the Mafia try and kill that vet before they become effective, that's what. I'll be active the whole game, not just from D3 on[. I'll be lynching scum TODAY, and I'll be hunting scum with you guys starting X pages ago…not on D3. All right that makes sense, but I've got to know: are you going to be as effective at scumhunting as a vet would? I'm not going to lie, here. I'm probably not as good at scumhunting as some of the vets may be. But I'll tell you what I DO know. I know that I probably try harder than all of them. It's part of the reason I've improved as much as I have since I started playing: because I relentlessly look for the scums. And here's something else to think about: go over my last couple of games and tell me that my alignment was a mystery to you. Go on, look. I bet anyone here (including some of our fresher players) could go look through my filter of any given game and accurately predict my alignment. Can you say the same about any of the vets also running for mayor? I'm talking to you too, vets: can you honestly say that I'll be harder to read than, say, BloodyC0bbler? Or Meapak? I'm almost convinced sir, but I have one final question for you: who would you lynch if chosen to be mayor? I can honestly say that I have no idea yet who I'm going to lynch today (and who asks that at a time like this anyway?) But I promise that I'll take everyone's input into account should you choose to elect me, and the final decision will be a town decision. I've bolded and underlined the part of this that is plain out wrong. Radfield in Election mafia was elected Mayor and proceeded to help town out an immense ammount. If Arctocod would have been elected he would have helped out a ton as well. Having a veteran in office is very important and I don't like that you're starting off by lieing. I understand BC's claim, however its like he said. He has a 50/50 chance of being town or mafia. Everything else being brought up about it is WIFOM. Keep that in mind. I agree completely with this statement below and will vote Protactinium for Mayor. ##Vote: Protactinium On January 14 2012 01:18 Palmar wrote: Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor. @Sandroba I've really enjoyed your posts so far. I'm a huge fan of lynching 0/1/2 BG's if you get into office (I realize this was Jackal's idea), but I'm glad you agreed with it. Make sure its completely random, flip a coin or draw straws if you do get in to office. If I had a second vote, it would be for you. @RgTheScwarc you have said some bad things this game. You flip from being irrationally angry to happy, and are calling people pro-town or "not town" for very little reason. You also say "lynching bad townies is middle-bad", no it is simply bad. Also, this Mason should mass claim thing is WIFOM. We won't know there alignment for sure, and already those who Mason will be in the spotlight by PM'ing others. While BC's claim does put him in the spotlight, it hasn't confirmed anything yet. And for now, instead of going insane over this, we need to figure out who we are electing and who they should kill. Those are the things we need NOW, if we use the Mason topic for those issues its fine, but we need to have this our focus so mafia can't control it by silently voting on someone. I want more talk from Candidates on their campaigns. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 06:06 Jayjay54 wrote: well if town chooses to ignore the masons, than these guys are actually not blue. So they know the identity of two people without any power. yay. why would a medic protect a powerless masons? And we also would take away a very powerful role from the mafia. I think it's a great move, as I think good players can handle pming with mafia, worse players are actually manipulated. Plus, mafia gets to proof read, while town don't. So again, here's the logic. Scum Mason > Town Mason => eliminate all masons => 0>0! Town's strongest weapon is finding inconsistencies and using logic. Mason's allow town to get more information for lynch. That is our strongest weapon. Scum Masons and Town Masons won't be given a free pass when they do PM someone, because they could be either town or mafia. So Masons simply give townies more chances to talk together and find Mafia. Having them all reveal themselves really only gives knowledge to Mafia. They now know where some of our blues are for future reference and can use this to gain a better chance at finding our more valuable blues. So, saying Scum Mason > Town Mason is just not correct. Saying mafia gets to proof read, while town doesn't is correct, but every post from every mafia can be proof read. This isn't helpful knowledge to tell town and doesn't prove that Scum Mason > Town Mason. After all of this, hopefully you've realized Mass Claiming Mason is a bad idea. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 06:44 ~OpZ~ wrote: Sheth....For real? That is your reason for voting for someones who already stated that their activity will be waning? Would all it take to get you to change to BC or Sandroba be a declaration of lynching Ciry or is it just because he has already chosen his lynch target? Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. ![]() They haven't stated their activity will be waning. No just switching to lynching Cir wouldn't cause me to switch my vote. On January 14 2012 06:48 Mattchew wrote: this. 100 times over. There is a greater chance scum misleads masons then there is masons catching scum in pm's. If you believe there is a greater chance scum misleads town, do you think this applies to talking in the thread as well? Why would you post that Mattchew? Its all about thinking things through and not using WIFOM. You and BC are both using things that aren't applicable to this game. This isn't a past game and this game is all about thinking, its not obvious that one side or the other will be able to deceive their opponent. Its about who thinks and acts the best for their side. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 07:10 ~OpZ~ wrote: That was stated prior to the game start. I'm just curious as to your reasons for voting for them and the only reason I find is he is willing to lynch ciry. You didn't really say as to why and I found that scummy, so I guess it begs the question, why are you voting for protact? You find a small point of my post, and call it scummy. You haven't complained about anyone else's votes and yet you consider that scummy. I wasn't even the first person to put my vote on him, but once its possibly gaining steam you point out that what I'm doing is scummy. You've also claimed to be our second Mason for those who missed it, as I didn't realize it until I read your filter. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
He straight up goes after who he thinks is posting badly. I feel like everyone else has simply said they'll do this, while Protactinium is actually doing it. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 07:25 Kenpachi wrote: id like a gist of what is going on right now People are saying stuff. Its day1. There are lots of pages to read. Ignorance will not be treated well. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 07:33 ~OpZ~ wrote: A small point? Voting for mayor...is a small point? I want to clarify that also AS YOU DODGE my question. And just because they did it without attracting my written attention means I can't address you without addressing them? Srsly. Bad argument is bad argument. I posted why above your post. You're welcome to address me about it, it just seems out of place. And then your complaining about me calling it a "small" point, which has nothing to do with whether I'm mafia or not(I'm not saying who I'm voting for isn't important, just that whether or not I consider it small or not isn't leading to if I'm mafia) You also seem quite scared from this post. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 14:03 wherebugsgo wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&user=87086 bum I don't know what you see, but what about any of these posts has utility in any way shape or form for town? In what world is Palmar "not 100% useless" in his current state? None of his posts have breached one line and almost all of them have 0 content. He says Meapak is good, which isn't very helpful, he calls kita's (very valid concerns about his play, mind) dumb, he calls VE dumb and bad, he asks a noob how he knows his meta, and he wants to vote Protact because of a half-assed early game case on ciryandor. If you seriously believe Palmar is not useless then I have to question your angle. I feel like Palmar definitely hasn't been the most useless this day. Those who want to kill off Palmar based on his Meta should be waiting far past just day 1. I'm pretty sure everyone has had a day or two where they can't play much. Lynching Palmar at this point is like lynching a lurker. @WBG -- What do you think about what Protactinium has posted? | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
I realize I'm ignoring the rest you said about Prot and BC, I agree with you mostly on that as well. From knowing my fair share of people who when they roll scum they play with very little posts (in fact my first game I feel scum lost because of Palmar's inability to post or even make an attempt) so I'm definitely not saying to trust Palmar, just I don't think we've given him enough time yet. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 15:10 wherebugsgo wrote: no, I'm saying this to get you guys to realize that he needs to be lynched. I don't care what potential he has as town to improve, because he's almost certainly not town and he's been given more than enough time to "improve" so far. He's not town. Kill his ass. Since none of the current candidates want to lynch Palmar, vote me if you want to see him die. I will run on the platform that Palmar dies today. This is a horrible campaign. On January 14 2012 15:02 Scamp wrote: Sheth, if we've not given Palmar enough time yet, then how much time is needed? More importantly, who have we given enough time to instead? Its not necessarily about time. I just wouldn't say from his posts alone (without knowing his meta) that hes acting scummy. Hes posted properly, hes simply used 1 sentence posts. Hes probably posted more original content with those "No thats stupid" sort of comments then myself. @Kitaman I liked his post about Cyrandor. Hes also called some people out for doing things I felt was stupid as well. I honestly don't like lynching based on someones meta this early. It just feels wrong to me. I don't want to die if I'm feeling like not posting a lot the first day in a game I'm in. I don't think that should be our reason for killing someone today. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 14 2012 15:46 kitaman27 wrote: How so? His only "that's stupid" posts have been in response to people questioning why he isn't posting. How do you consider this original content? This response is cringe worthy. Who are these people that is calling out? You're really stretching it here. It's fine if you don't believe Palmar should be lynched, but why are you trying to pass off his posts as contributions when they clearly aren't? Even Palmar himself wouldn't say he has posted original content with a straight face. I'm not trying really hard to defend him. I'm just pointing out that I don't want him lynched now. They weren't horrible posts. He explains his Mayor candidate choice : On January 13 2012 18:34 Palmar wrote: I have no intentions of running for mayor or caring much about the mayor elections. I'm probably going to be voting VisceraEyes, depending on how dumb he will be through the day. Upon looking at this next post its obvious its bad posting. On January 14 2012 01:18 Palmar wrote: On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote: I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor. Switching from VE to Prot for very little reason. Then he tries to get someone to do some analysis On January 14 2012 01:32 Palmar wrote: On January 14 2012 01:27 Chaosquo wrote: a) you are mafia and dont care about the game Prove it. He is being active and to jump on Sandroba's bandwagon he is a big name. He either dies soon or we get more information out of him. And he does explain his reasoning for switching to Prot's campaign here : [B]On January 14 2012 01:35 Palmar wrote: Ciryandor, for speculating about if sandroba or I were going for the mayor position. I don't like that I'm stuck defending Palmar, but I think he is a bad day 1 lynch. Enough of me defending him, lets get some reasoning for why people are voting for who they are voting for. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 15 2012 00:57 Toadesstern wrote: I'm visiting my sis so I'm out for a couple of hours. However I still have a couple of people I have no idea about. I'm just leaving you with a list of 5 or so names and if you see your name on that list I'd like to know who you want to vote for mayor and if you had to decide the first lynch who it would be. I'm only mentioning people I think might read this, so thx if you do: + Show Spoiler + 5. risk.nuke 9. Kenpachi (you won't answer this right?) 11. EchelonTee 14. Liquid`Sheth 20. Ciryandor 49. Scamp turns out I got 6 names instead of only 5 but yeah that's it for now. I'm voting for Protactinium for Mayor at the moment. He has what I believe to have been the best case for Mayor. If I had to decide the first lynch, I'd probably make it a town affair and get everyone's opinions on who they wanted to lynch and then decide based on what that information gave me. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 15 2012 03:12 Ciryandor wrote: Whew, finally caught up after 25+ pages. Seriously. I just got home from being away all day today and had a long day at work yesterday, and people think I'm a good lynch candidate, especially for like half the mayor candidates? That's just fine and dandy, but there are other players who fit the same criterion. Some reads on players of interest: I honestly think GGQ has just as bad a posting history as mine, and that he has escaped scrutiny by creating an FoS on me just because I was asking why I should be believing the early candidates like Cyber_Cheese instead of Mr. Wiggles during that time. I also can't blame Protactinium for thinking I'm bad as well with my responses, but I wouldn't vote for him just because he thinks BC is scum, and he hasn't buttressed that argument since. As far as I've read, I think BC has townie interests at heart and is in the usual situation with leading mayor candidates, having a hard time justifying what he would do with the position beyond the Day 1 lynch power, but a point against him as well is that he has not delivered his mason partner, which he had decided to reveal in one of his posts. Also, risk.nuke being suddenly defensive after some criticism of him making a half hearted push for mayor is IMO very newbie townie play, or a scum being baited to attract others' attention to him. This should be noted as I think risk is noob town who does not know how to defend his positions properly. Just a question, where is Kurumi? At least sandroba has posted even if he thinks I'm scummy for asking if he's running, and Palmar has said he doesn't really care now about the vote; which is uncharacteristically sour of him. I read Palmar as trolling town more than scum because of that, as he would have probably given a token "I support someone because they're worth trusting" post (as that could influence newbies/lurkers) who see people commenting at him being a veteran voting that way at the very least if he were scum. Finally, I have to note that Bill's post that it is likely we have a scum candidate among the front-runners leads me to think we should actually do a vote-swing to a random strong candidate, and that the votes for that person should come from people who have already voted, as IMO it is more likely for scum to have delayed voting to have more influence over the result in a close race and not waste votes in a throw-away push for their candidate if a runaway win were to happen. Right now I'm torn between Proact and Sandroba in voting, because at least they're concrete in promising ONE NAME to lynch instead of being wishy-washy in getting a list of targets up, and that I think they have plans for town after Day 1 that don't need to be publicized yet. However he wanted to kill you at first. So I find it interesting that you're still ok with putting him as mayor. @BC You say again that Mason is an amazingly strong role in the hands of mafia because they have 10 ppl to bounce their ideas off. I just want to say if as the person who got Masoned with the ScumMason you don't realize that someones posts are very different then how they act in the thread, and they seem like they are coming from more then one person then you've made some mistakes. Quit throwing out the theory that just because they have ppl to talk to about it, that scum mason is better. Don't even know why your still throwing this scare tactic out there. + Show Spoiler + On January 15 2012 03:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Using the phrase "has been on my nuts all game" is more or less accurate. You are really the only person who has been against me for a decent period of time. You also have said your reasons why. Do i agree with them? No. I do understand them however. If you compare what you were doing to what VE did you would understand why he is on a radar now and you are currently not. However, as for the upsides of my claim. Look at the specific post Incog (the hydra) quoted of mine from my town analysis thread that I believe i linked in a previous post. (if i didnt i can dig it up, its also somewhere on page 4-6 i believe of the mafia forum). I stress that most people don't use pm's correctly. In a situation where only a few specific players have access to that domain, it gives the mafia an advantage. They will have 10 people able to work on manipulating a player. You can say "i am going to look for manipulation so it won't happen" but again. Ask what I did to VE. It was subtle and vile. All I did was plant an idea that I knew he would think on and run with, and he did it in a way I knew he would. Manipulation is not obvious and a good player will know exactly how to do it without being caught. Mafia will have 10 people making sure its done right. I know that I can freely romp in pm land, but no smart mafia is going to talk to me seriously if i mason them. Why? Because i could do to them what they would do to another player. As such I had to think. How likely is it that only top players got the mason role? Unlikely as fw rng's roles. We are also a gimped mason as we lose contact with who we target after each cycle and can never use it on them again. This is inherently not helpful to town. Why? Because a townie benefits from bouncing ideas off one another in pms. However you need the time to build up a "trust" of sorts with the person to actually get a serious discussion on reads. People will naturally always suspect you at first when mason'd or at least they should. That is not alot of time to get by the distrust and have a discussion of who x and y think is scum. Then you have to go over all those pms and see if there is a hidden agenda there. PM's in the way we traditionally use them to "bounce ideas" or find scum are used over long periods of time with people mulling over information. As your ability to get reads is so short term they are unreliable and far more useful to manipulate or mislead which takes far less effort, and is doable in a much faster span of time. As such I opted to want to discuss the role. However, I also knew that based on my decision to heavily push this point, I would be forced to claim my role as there would be no way I would be able to hide that fact for the game while pushing heavy on its discussion. Even if I could, it could lead masons to out and out claim and would look extremely bad if I didn't while essentially outing people in thread. As such I did right from the get go. @BC Hello there. I've been following you quite closely. At first you suggest that you claiming Mason puts you at 50scum/50town. Since you posted that you've talked more about how this makes you slightly more town. Do you still think your only 50/50 btw? And as for your claim that I'm contradicting myself here : + Show Spoiler + On January 15 2012 04:52 BloodyC0bbler wrote: so the belief you have for deciding a lynch is via discussion and town consensus but you are voting for a player who has made 0 posts aside from saying he would kill ciryandor if elected or kill me if elected. so You are actually in favour of having someone lynched with 0 discussion as you are strictly following the most inactive of all the candidates who sole stance currently is lynching me. contradiction So to just look at the facts on your post against me, its that once you got threatened you started to use poor logic and counter attack. Just because the person I want to be elected isn't following what I'd do if I was elected isn't a contradiction. I'm not running for mayor this game at all. You are also trying to discredit Prot by saying he has made 0 posts aside from saying who he'd lynch if he was mayor. Hes also posted a lot of analysis on you. So there wasn't 0 discussion. I'm even happier with Prot as my mayoral target because of this. @Prot please post a little more on what you've seen and think at the moment. Just be transparent with where your leaning now please! | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 15 2012 05:25 Toadesstern wrote: don't, under any circumstances talk about this or answer what L is asking you. Let them wifom about if you really are a vig and be happy with that. The exception to this, is please if you do shoot, post who you shot RIGHT at the deadline. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
As for the PM's issue, well I don't know what anyone here sounds like in PM's via Mason. The whole game is based on meta meta of someones meta'ing metaness so I'm not sold on mafia having a better Mason simply because there is 10 of them on the team. However I can see your point. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
IF YOU ARE A MASON OR MASONED WITH SOMEONE, USE CAUTION WHEN ANNOUNCING. MAFIA ENJOY KILLING BLUES. MASON IS A POWERFUL ROLE WHICH CAN BE USED WELL WITHOUT COMING OUT TO EVERYONE. DONT FEEL PRESSURED TO COME OUT BECAUSE OF "MASS ROLE CLAIM THEORIES" Back to your regularly scheduled programming.. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 15 2012 06:00 Palmar wrote: I'm still giving my support to Protactinium, I have no problem with him killing BC if only for how stupid regardless of BC's alignment his claim is. Palmar do I look scummy to you for defending you? I mean I should look scummier for that. Can you tell me what you think the benefits / cons are for just EVERYONE who is Mason claiming now or being revealed by their mason buddy? @Jitsu It wasn't necessarily directed towards you just towards everyone in general. For those who don't have time to read this all VIGS : Jitsu [bl] Mattchew [/bl] Opz BC I'm posting this because I'm sure the mafia have noticed who they are and I wonder if townies have noticed as sometimes they've been hidden in long posts. I just think its ironic that we as town have revealed possibly 4 blues to mafia for very little reason. I feel like Opz's claim + VE revealing you (Jitsu) were useless claims. I understand Matt / BC's claim, and I'd like anyone else who wants to claim to have a reason for it. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 15 2012 06:12 Cyber_Cheese wrote: I did one manually + Show Spoiler + Votes for MrWiggles (0) Votes for Bill Murray (3) VisceraEyes bumatlarge Macpo Votes for kitaman27 (1) evantrees Votes for VisceraEyes (1) blahz0r Votes for BloodyC0bbler (7) Meapak_Ziphh risk.nuke GGQ zeks Lanaia Cyber_Cheese Foolishness Votes for Protactinium (3) Palmar Adam4167 Kurumi Votes for Meapak_Ziphh (0) Votes for Sandroba (1) Nisani201 Votes for Mattchew (Void) jayjay54 (Void) Scamp (Void) Votes for Supersoft (1) Bill Murray Hold up, why are you blue hunting Sheth? They already claimed. I'm not blue hunting. If I was mafia I would have posted the list in Scumville QT. Its meant to help clear up whatever we can around those who have claimed and to keep an eye on them. @WBG -- You don't seem to be helping town. You're making posts that say you don't like candidates and think others are scum. Yet you're providing no logic and cluttering up the thread. Posts like this need to stop : + Show Spoiler + On January 15 2012 11:46 wherebugsgo wrote: I haven't voted. I'm thinking about voting BC. As I've said repeatedly, I don't like any of the candidacies. Bill Murray is a bad candidate. Who is he even going to lynch? None of the proposed lynch candidates are any good. None of the reasons for mayorship are good either. I'd like to vote BC because he looks the most townie of the people who have run and he's the most likely to get shot as well. I would vote for Foolishness if he actually had a chance at becoming mayor. Although, at this point, as usual he has done very little so his alignment is still unknown. Mafia will definitely shoot him n1 if he's town, though. At least make explain WHY you're doing things. Like this : On January 15 2012 12:02 wherebugsgo wrote: I'm pretty sure scum want BM in office over BC. Which probably means BC is town. Kita is scum. dat bitch. I'm going to be watching you bugs. I really think your scum based on what I've seen so far. Just putting that out there and now I'm going to go over every one of your posts with a good comb. Posts like this man if your town your doing it wrong. If your Mafia keep it up! Posts like this are made by someone with a huge Ego, work past it : + Show Spoiler + On January 15 2012 12:33 wherebugsgo wrote: wowowowowowow. Alright, I was wrong. Fuck. @Palmar -- Sorry you got lynched. This was a stupid lynch because even based on your posting you were being active. From our few games together I was pretty sure of my meta read on you being town. Take care and look forward to playing with you next time. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 15 2012 22:57 rgTheSchworz wrote: Bill, I think you're putting too many players on the Town list.For some of them, I don't even undestand the reason why-WBG, kita and sheth too. Sheth started a Protact vote wagon, and you list protact as scum, shouldnt he be suspected? Also we should focus on 1 or 2 lynch candidates, and pressure them hard, else we let them get away with diverting attention and starting third-party wagons. Right now, those would be Risk.nuke and Macpo. I encourage them to post in the next 6 hours, else they're scum in my eyes.They're from EU too, so they have no excuse. An interesting point being Palmar actually started the voting train on Protactinium. And I simply followed along. Also you shouldn't say "shouldn't he be suspected?" you should say he should also be under suspicion if you feel that way. This way you just sound like a mafia asking a townie how they feel to figure out how you should feel. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
Prota,I believe you're bussing macpo because of your sudden switch from BC to him once you found out someone was going to notice anyway. Cyriandor was, for you, nothing more than a simple start to your campaign of painting scum-You were planning to switch anyway and let the case be forgotten. After macpo flips red, i'll turn towards you. You're suspicious, but there may still be cases in which you're innocent-I'll delve into it. He says he thinks Prota is bussing Macpo. Bussing implies one mafia getting onto another mafia to make him look more townie. I actually made the same mistake of saying I was bussing Cephiro or something like that in Newbie Mini Mafia recently and tried to play off the fact I said "bussing" accidentally. I however actually was bussing him. I'm actually really happy lynching Macpo based upon this and all of the other logic against him. If Macpo flips red I'd be quite happy lynching Schworz next and if he flps red then lynch Prot. (The only way Schworz would know he is bussing someone is if he was mafia too). I realize this might not be the case, so I'll also post whatever else I've found lately. I feel Nisani's post against Prot was really badly worded and just a bad attempt at trying to lynch someone. A lot of people have broughten up the fact that Prot has switched from BC to Macpo and from Cyr to BC. I feel like these switches can at the outside seem "scummy", however they are based on good reasons. I think switching for good reasons is actually a sign of a townie. Once you start either being afraid to switch because of good reasoning scum is winning. Pandemic is actually thinking a lot like me at first thought which is interesting. And WBG upon a really close examination I find I can't really prove you are mafia. I'm still watching you and I still think you going solely off your meta on Palmar was bad, however I think you could just be agressive townie. Time will tell. Also @Jitsu I'd like to be Masoned with you. I feel like this would be beneficial to both of us. TL:DR I'm worried Swortz Scumslipped and that Macpo, Swortz and Prot are mafia so I'm voting to lynch Macpo based on this and the other analysis which stll stands against him. ##Vote: Macpo | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
What are your thoughts on GGQ + Macpo? @Opz were not lynching Lanaia today because of your "gut". Post what your "gut" is telling you and why. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 17 2012 08:18 rgTheSchworz wrote: @Sheth, do not think I am uninformed or dumb in any way. I play IRL mafia if that helps and some friends have gotten me into forum mafia. Feel free to speculate on my supposed stupidity.Logically before playing i have read some Mafiawiki.I know what the term means. Macpo is a clear case for reasons i have mentioned.I won't switch to someone else unless people fail to vote. ##Vote: Macpo Everyone makes mistakes, I wasn't calling you dumb. I in fact state I've made the same mistake. It is speculation, so we'll see. Did you accidentally type bussing then btw? I notice you never really deny it in your post. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
Also, for those who want to lynch Prot consider his reads on Macpo + GGQ. + Show Spoiler + Macpo Here we revisit Macpo. I won't restate my previous analysis. However, I think people are not seeing the subtle differences in how Macpo is different from some of the other newbies or lurkers. The key is overemphasis on inexperience to the point that he is begging to be ignored. This is a textbook case of mafia. But for all of you doubters, here is a new piece of information. Look at Macpo's 4th post here: and compare to his first post, where he overly emphasizes his newbiness. See the difference? Macpo doesn't apologize at all in this post, and spews a bunch of opinions. Previously, he stated that "I just feel that being confident in my claims on day 1 is kind of stupid, as there is almost no rational basis for being so." Huge contrast. Its as if its a different person posting. Its pretty obvious that Macpo is getting coaching from his mafia friends. Then his next post: Besides the fact that Macpo doesn't follow his own advice and really doesn't "get into it and help town", notice the pleading tone. I bet its a different coach this time! LOLOLOLOL GGQ For not having caught up yet, GGQ has a shockingly strong opinion that Macpo is newb town. What's even more interesting is that this read is his basis for urging people not to vote me in. Why does GGQ have such a strong attachment to Macpo? He never once discusses lynch targets or inquires about who the other mayoral candidates is going to lynch. But for some reason he really wants to save Macpo. Without even considering whether or not I am otherwise a good candidate for mayor. He doesn't attempt to persuade me not to lynch Macpo, he just flat out says that I shouldn't be voted in. In short, GGQ is apathetic both about who becomes mayor and who gets lynched. But for some reason he really cares that Macpo doesn't get lynched. GGQ is also lurking hard while providing no content. Contrast to Responsibility Mafia where he is active, expresses interest in finding a good target for the lynch and gives a few detalied analyses on GMarshal and Mr. Wiggles. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 17 2012 08:25 rgTheSchworz wrote: Learn to read. No, not at all accidental, i find it more helpful to use an agreed-upon term than a whole sentence to describe the same thing. I read that you know what the term means. I believe you've always known what the term means. I asked if you didn't mean to say that and you havn't responded to that in two posts. Its a small thing, but a definite thing. I agree that it is easy to use an agreed-upon term to describe things. Again here your saying that you believe he was bussing. You're really not convincing me you didn't scum slip. However for the sake of kieeping today about the small amount of lynch targets, lets get back on GGQ / Macpo. I'll look through Schwortz filter a bit more closesly later on. I'm sure it will be very interesting from what I remember of his posting ![]() | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 17 2012 08:34 ~OpZ~ wrote: I done posted my suspcisions,. I haven't directly quoted them, because I'm being lazy. Lanaia doesn't have many posts, click on filter. But i've done posted them, it isn't my fault you don't bother reading. Your still scum in my eyes too. I haven't read anything from Macpo, so give me a little bit. Same for GGQ. Here are some quotes about your "posted suspicions". + Show Spoiler + On January 17 2012 08:01 ~OpZ~ wrote: I want to lynch Lanaia. Every post is wishywashy, and that big post with probably 30 people on it was a huge attempt to appear to be doing something. Just doesn't feel right. + Show Spoiler + On January 17 2012 08:17 ~OpZ~ wrote: I've never played with her, and regardless of it, I said I feel off. I'm trusting my gut on this one. She is mafia. Protact is suspected strongly mafia to me and should be to everyone else, plus annoying as heck, example: They've been asked repeatedly, by multiple people, to post which one of them are posting. It's not hard or difficult to comply with that, and seems reasonable I believe. Also, THEY gained a random ass following, claimed to have had given Day one direction, when they had all of 4 posts when they claimed to have given direction to the day. Seriously. That's a load of horse manure. I don't trust protact, at all even if he pointed out ciryandor. He wasn't the first to call him out and even changed his target to BC afterwards. I won't sheep after his wishes. + Show Spoiler + On January 17 2012 03:03 ~OpZ~ wrote: Could Lanaia be mafia? You ever consider that? I have...Not just the long post today were neutral. Almost every post. But I'll be pointing that out later, I gotta do some things real quick. You say it isn't your fault that I don't bother reading. I in fact have been reading. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 17 2012 08:50 ~OpZ~ wrote: I called you out earlier for voting for protact for no reason, and then now you want to go and defend him saying he was one of the first to go after ciry. You mean until he changed to wanting to lynch BC, when Ciry was obviously more scummy? Looks to me like he was trying to bus a weaker scum. Seems kind of early to me, but go read ciry's posts, or check your inbox. He was obvious mafia. I'm only defending him in the sense I think we have a better lynch today. He changed who he wanted to lynch, but he never took suspicion off of Ciry. (Read his large post on Scum that he posted before the Day ended). And yes its obvious now that Ciry is mafia, thanks for pointing that out. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
At the start of the day remember that Meapak brought up that we want to keep the candidate pool small. He provided Sandroba / Protactinium / GGQ as our "primary targets". I then added Macpo to that list thanks to primarily my re-read and thoughts on Protactiniums post that Macpo is red . As this day has went on, the two lurkers here GGQ + Macpo haven't posted much and this has led people to worry that perhaps they are just lynching a lurker and the lack of opposition to it makes them think that it will be a town flip. However I would like to point out that it would be practically impossible to "defend" macpo or GGQ based on their posts so far, so it makes sense that no one has went out in his defense solidly yet. I still believe our logic for lynching him is good and would like to get a red out of this lynch. If you haven't voted for a double lynch tomorrow please do. On to someone else who I really feel is red. I feel like we have lots of good candidates from this post here : + Show Spoiler + On January 17 2012 13:28 Foolishness wrote: READ CAREFULLY! DON'T LOSE THIS POST! REPOST MANY TIMES I am making this post as a way of compiling the thoughts of the few people in this game who are making sense and posting good analysis. A lot of it will be my own thoughts, but it's heavily based on a few people (should be obvious) who are the most transparent and the most obvious townies. 9 Mafia remaining. Here's the preliminary suspects: Macpo, GGQ, L. These are the people I feel we have the best case for and most of the transparent people in the thread seem to agree about these 3. Personally I think GGQ is town and we should avoid lynching him for now. Protact already gave viable reasons why Macpo is better than GGQ today, and I feel there is little to argue there. sandroba pointed out how L is acting like in Ver's game, and I couldn't agree more. We also have Incog's analysis against L. Secondary suspects: Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees. These 3 people have garnered attention from a few people but not from everyone, so they are listed as secondary candidates. I am of the belief that all 3 of these people are mafia. evantrees is already mentioned by Incog. I think Cyber_Cheese highlighted a good summary of chaosquo here. Most of it is similar arguments to Macpo. Bill Murray as red? I think so. Others have cast suspicion but there's not been a full analysis anywhere. A few people have commented that the election "feels" weird in some way, and I definitely sympathize. The votes for Bill Murray come across as the most suspicious: lots of random votes there. Personally I was surprised he even got into office (remember I was out all day so I saw the results without reading the previous 20 pages). I do realize I may have initially pushed him into candidacy, but I shall take responsibility for that and see to it that he's lynched in the near future. But to be simple: Bill Murray posted a lot, and got into office. Since then he's been pretty passive at the helm (so has BC I realize). That's good enough reason to warrant a ton of suspicion, as he should be actively scumhunting and posting without fear at this point. Remaining mafia candidates: Jackal, Opz, kingjames, zeks. Incog has an analysis against Jackal as we know. I am not on board with him being mafia yet. Traditionally when he is mafia he posts paragraphs, and not one-liners. However he warrants suspicion for having an apathetic attitude. Opz is someone who I believe Sheth was the first to cast doubt on, and I must say Sheth is definitely onto something. I know of the past Opz as a town player who is aggressive, not afraid to call people out on their bullshit. That's something we aren't seeing much of this game. He's posted a few of his own thoughts, but there is a clear lack of effort. Bored townie who is facepalming at having to read 100 pages? Possibly. Mafia hiding in the shadows? Fits better. kingjames is called out on by Incog, and there's further analysis by BC. His last sentence is the perfect sum to kingjames: "The key thing to note is that in contrast to his town play where he is outgoing and analytical, his posts in this game are very subdued, seem artificial and feel overly planned." kingjames has yet to do anything to contradict this. zeks I felt strongly about yesterday, he made a bad post which is nothing like his normal outspoken attitude (though it's been a while since he's played I think). He has since asked for a replacement and hasn't posted, but should still be looked at in the future. Meapak_Ziphh is someone I would like to throw out there as a candidate (which shouldn't be a surprise from the few of my recent posts). What has Meapak done this game? Tried to get GGQ lynched, and unfortunately that's about all he's tried to do. There is a very aggressive push from him to kill this guy, which I find a little suspicious and slightly out of character. Mafia: Macpo, GGQ, L, Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees, Opz, Kingjames, Meapak_Ziphh. Substitute a few off candidates and I think we've found our 9: Jackal, BrownBear, zeks, Munk-E, other random inactive player goes here. DONT LOSE THIS POST ITS SO IMPORTANT! Writing all that I think the usefulness of this post is immediately made clear. The most prominent townies and the ones doing the analysis are all right on most of their reads. It's just each person has found 2-3 mafia on their own, and most of the time they are all different. Pooling this information together I realize it's hard to call anyone and their analysis wrong, as when you analyze the big picture everything fits together. Anyone in their right mind would look at this game and think "wow this atmosphere is perfect for the mafia". Ver once told me that lots of times it's easier to find the mafia when the town atmosphere sucks because they will not be the ones causing chaos and disruption. Instead they will be sitting on the sidelines enjoying the show while the townies flail around. Look at all the names I've listed above. Everyone (yes everyone on that list) is guilty of apathy and does not have the interests of the town in mind. They are not thinking long term, or analyzing the big picture. They aren't playing the game, they are watching. Macpo Many others have said so, and though I may be biased, I still think it's best we lynch him today. I believe his case is still by far the strongest we have at the moment, especially since he has responded to his threats (with even more reason to kill him). At the time of writing GGQ has yet to say anything. We kill him (Macpo) today and spend the night figuring out who has the next best case. In the meantime, I'm going to be looking for connections between the above players to see if anyone can be ruled out or automatically included. IF YOU HAVE FINISHED READING AND YOU ARE A COMPETENT TOWN PLAYER PLEASE READ AGAIN Also, after sifting through this information, I feel we have a strong enough lead to start killing like there's no tomorrow. ##Vote: double lynch I'd like to add my case against OpZ here as well. His first post is as follows : + Show Spoiler + On January 13 2012 15:29 ~OpZ~ wrote: IIRC, Foolishness is one of the few people that actually....supports BM? Besides myself of course. And when you know BM...You just know BM...He's not that difficult of a read. (for Wiggs and Kita) I just think its rather funny Foolishness is pushing for someone else to be mayor, when he himself dies like almost every Day one. I would rather just vote for Foolishness to be completely honest, but Kitaman as of right now is who I'm thinking of. Past games I've played with him we was pretty damned good, and he's actually wanting the position. Are you planning on be really active Foolishness? Also, I probably need to go to fucking bed, 1:30EST and I work at 7...-_- Right off the bat he wants to support BM because he is "easy to read" and has however posted no content on this matter afterwards. He then suggests that Kita and Wiggles can read him. (Kita + Wiggles were both shot at last night). Interesting so far... His second post : + Show Spoiler + The Mason this game is more just about whispering it looks like. It really isn't that strong in the game. They can't create circles or nothing. They can disseminate roles privately I suppose but the threat is always there that the mason is mafia. As you yourself might be BC. I don't really see too much power in the role as of the moment. Especially if you play the game as such as to ignore pms. Starts off by saying that Mason is a weak roll. And that people should be worried the mason is mafia (after BC claimed). And then suggests ignoring PM's as an idea. Mason however isn't a weak roll at all. Thirdly and weirdly : + Show Spoiler + On January 14 2012 06:02 ~OpZ~ wrote: I'm still wondering the proper benefits to the mass mason claim. I'm neutral as again, the role seems rather bland for the town this game. Being a mason doesn't confirm you. I'd like to know the general town consensus. So far I see Sandroba screaming for mass mason claim. Which I suppose all of the whisperers being public knowledge would be a good thing. But I don't wanna feel like sheep. I suppose theres no way around it though, or that its really important. I'm Mason #2. And I mason'd BC. But he won't talk to me. *cries* Doesn't know about mass mason claim suggests the roll is bland, which I can understand. Doesn't want to feel like sheep. However eventually says that he is Mason #2 and that BC won't talk to him. Nothing honestly too weird here. 4th Post : + Show Spoiler + Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. ![]() Wants to ignore PMS again. Its not highly logical at all, its actually the opposite. It removes all logic. However after this he says that hes still going to PM Bill. Really contradictory about the Mason roll. He then flip flops entirely within 2 posts : First he says On January 14 2012 15:41 ~OpZ~ wrote: As for Palmar, I'll admit I'm seeing a difference, but I've seen this same argument against Palmar a few times. Everyone seems to attack him if he doesn't do his usual posting for mayor or what not. I'd rather he contribute more than what he has. As of right now I find him a very viable lynch candidate. Then : I suppose anytime is a good time, just I don't think using a mayor lynch to lynch a power player like him is a smart move. Thats really what I meant by not a good time to go after him. Claiming not to trust him is the truest thing I've ever said, and I say it every game. I don't like following people just because they say thats the best way. I'm not gonna be sheeped around. And I just asked you about Protact because I was asking somebody elses opinion about it also. I just wanted some discussion on a player So he at first suggests lynching Palmar then doesn't want to go after him because he is a "power player" if I'm correct in understanding this. Also HERE IS A HUGE MISTAKE. When he says that he just asked about Protact because "I just wanted some discussion on a player". Why would you say this? You don't want just discussion on a player. You want to find out what the player and the poster thinks in depth and why. You were so against Protact and then say this its horrible. You just want their opinion and discussion... you should want to know if they are Mafia or not. Next post : Completely unhelpful to town players : On January 14 2012 16:17 ~OpZ~ wrote: Could not of said it better myself. But now that he mentions it, where the hell is BM? I'm not sold that any of the mayor candidate have a proper direction right now, and for all declaring they'd be active, they seem to be lacking. He is VERY sure Mattchew is blue : On January 15 2012 07:23 ~OpZ~ wrote: I'm changing my vote to mattchew for reasons that I find completely obvious. Everyone else should also. However at this point there was no reason to think he was blue, at least no real reason any better then to think BC or even Opz is blue. All he had done was claim Mason. Its somewhat a good point for you that you wanted to vote for him, however at this point it was not completely obvious. THEN EVEN THOUGH HE IS VERY SURE ABOUT MATTCHEW; He changes his vote to L!!!! On January 15 2012 08:22 ~OpZ~ wrote: I like L's direction his post carries. They like all the extraneous drama that everyone elses had. He's also a notable scum hunter, and very successful at it. I think I'm leaving my vote for him on him actually. No reason for this!! Only reason would be because he knows Mattchew is blue, so he just wanted to post that he thought he wasn't guilty and then to possibly go on to someone that is mafia. (Good chance L is mafia if OpZ flips red or at least slightly better chance) Going to post this now, because I don't want it to get too long. The rest of his posts are calling out Lanaia for being scum. When pressured why he thinks this by me he suggests that hes already posted the why. However he hadn't. He then posts the why which basically is "shes not posting much interesting information". Its not because she looks scummy or has acted scummy, its simply because shes not posting much to help town. Which may seem like a good reason, but I really feel its not that great. This is his complete evidence for why Lanaia is mafia : + Show Spoiler + Oh, I'm sorry. Must I dredge up all the evidence of why I feel that way. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716¤tpage=64#1267 "I really liked L up until he asked about the vig shot. However, he's redeemed himself since in my eyes. I like his posting style." L even asked her, how did he redeem himself? Because he hadn't done shit since then. Then she says "If three people hadn't just switched to WBG all at once, I would have voted him. It just feels kinda weird. I mean, I know it's not the end of the cycle and it won't push him into the win (iirc), but... " and just leaves it at that. Fine. Okay. The obvious reason is, despite claiming to want to, she's too concerned with looking suspicious to follow what she claims to want to do. Almost all of her posts consist of this as a premise. Being concerned about looking suspicious and voicing this concern. No real meat. When asked to point out people she would lynch today? She picks two people I'd consider lurkers. Two people least likely to defend themselves. Although the posts as of late, have been more town related, I'm still highly suspect, and would get behind a lynch. So, if I do happen to die this night, I'd like this case to be top priority for tomorrow and I'm bringing it up early as I think he is red . ~OpZ~ the Mafia | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 15 2012 07:23 ~OpZ~ wrote: I'm changing my vote to mattchew for reasons that I find completely obvious. Everyone else should also. On January 15 2012 08:22 ~OpZ~ wrote: I like L's direction his post carries. They like all the extraneous drama that everyone elses had. He's also a notable scum hunter, and very successful at it. I think I'm leaving my vote for him on him actually. On January 15 2012 03:58 jcarlsoniv wrote: ![]() Mattchew was walking to the post office to send a letter to his friend. He also had his bundle of campaign posters in his bag ready to post around the town. All of a sudden, he noticed a large shadow directly above him. Before he could look up to see what it was, he was crushed under the massive weight of the object. As a crowd gathered 'round to look at the book that fell from the sky, they knew that the Fates had taken matters into their own hands. Mattchew the Mason has been modkilled. + Show Spoiler + Seriously though, guys. Everyone go back and read the rules right now. Ignorance will not be tolerated. (Time stamped posts above) True, I did just read your filter, but I also took it in context mostly. I saw that between your two posts (voting for Mattchew and then L) Mattchew had not died. I didn't even think of the possibility that you would vote for a dead person. Turns out I was wrong. You're also right you weren't implying Kita / Wiggles knew BM. Your parenthesis use was confusing to me. However you do still say that you do (know how BM posts when Mafia and that he is easy to read) and yet you've never posted again about it after that. The rest of my post isn't out of context, or wrong or a lie. And you mention twice about the Mattchew --> L thing was in the wrong time. I feel like your defense is just showing that you are really angry at this and probably not thinking that well about it. You ignore how you switched from wanting to lynch Palmar to not wanting to and some other points I've broughten up. Even in your defense you have a huge contradiction. You say : "Holy fucking shit son. I haven't been the harbinger of Protact is mafia or anything this game. Oh no. I asked Scamp, WHO HAS BEEN MIGHTY QUIET, about Protact changing from Ciryandor to wanting to lynch BC, WHO I HAD the strongest town read on. Get this trash out of my face you protact following scum. I've done pointed out you buddying him once." So hes not the harbringing that Protact is mafia but he is pointing him out that I'm a protact following scum and then : "You mad cuz I pointed you out for buddying your scum buddy protact?" So he is really sure that both myself and Protact are both mafia. I've been agreeing with what Protact has said, however even in my defense I only say that I think there are better lynches today then him. So hes said here that he isn't always saying Prot is scum, but says it twice in his post. Another thing to try and take away the attention from you is you say that I make no mention of my reason for voting Protactinium. My reason was posted to you a few pages ago. Someone linked my original post way back when I made it. Why are you blatantly taking something out of context when you know its out of context. Here is my post for why I voted for him : On January 14 2012 07:29 Liquid`Sheth wrote: As for why I'm voting for Protactinium for Mayor : He straight up goes after who he thinks is posting badly. I feel like everyone else has simply said they'll do this, while Protactinium is actually doing it. This post just makes you even more guilty in my eyes. I'm trying really hard to adjust my reads this game if I find they are wrong, and on you I'm really sure I'm just right. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 13 2012 15:29 ~OpZ~ wrote: IIRC, Foolishness is one of the few people that actually....supports BM? Besides myself of course. And when you know BM...You just know BM...He's not that difficult of a read. (for Wiggs and Kita) I just think its rather funny Foolishness is pushing for someone else to be mayor, when he himself dies like almost every Day one. I would rather just vote for Foolishness to be completely honest, but Kitaman as of right now is who I'm thinking of. Past games I've played with him we was pretty damned good, and he's actually wanting the position. Are you planning on be really active Foolishness? Also, I probably need to go to fucking bed, 1:30EST and I work at 7...-_- You say you can't read him like that and then post 10 lines of games you've played with him showing you do know him and then say nothing important. You say "I havn't seen anything blatant from him". If your not mafia you are so insanely contradictory. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
Also I read all of the post that was cut off, you made it very vague. Just trying to write my entire post off as untrue because of two times when I misinterpreted your vague chat is wrong. Its not the individual points that make an argument, but all of it taken together. And the whole post taken together isn't "not in context and false". And you saying On January 13 2012 15:29 ~OpZ~ wrote: And when you know BM...You just know BM...He's not that difficult of a read.- REALLY implies you think hes an easy read. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 18 2012 10:36 Lanaia wrote: My gut is saying "lynch BM for not making any goddamn sense in his actions." My brain says to lynch someone who feels scummier (aka macpo). dammit, what do I do... I have 1 hour 45 minutes to decide. I'm sure you guys don't think it's worth it to lynch macpo. However, if BM is lynched today, we lose something potentially lifesaving (however it appears to be in the wrong hands). On the other hand, it might be better to just get rid of him and spare us the trouble. I'm sure you can imagine my surprise when I got the notification of having been incarcerated. Okay... If you are telling the truth, then this post gave me my decision. I'm not voting BM today. I think. Hell, we can afford to give him another day, no? I've never played with him outside of IRC before so I'll take your word for it. Can't you tell from the vote count that it doesn't matter if you vote BM or ANYONE at this point? You think that ~OpZ~ saying he can read BM and can't read BM in the same post makes you not want to lynch BM? (If you trust him, which you then say you do ?) Care to explain this a bit more? | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 17 2012 13:28 Foolishness wrote: READ CAREFULLY! DON'T LOSE THIS POST! REPOST MANY TIMES I am making this post as a way of compiling the thoughts of the few people in this game who are making sense and posting good analysis. A lot of it will be my own thoughts, but it's heavily based on a few people (should be obvious) who are the most transparent and the most obvious townies. 9 Mafia remaining. Here's the preliminary suspects: Macpo, GGQ, L. These are the people I feel we have the best case for and most of the transparent people in the thread seem to agree about these 3. Personally I think GGQ is town and we should avoid lynching him for now. Protact already gave viable reasons why Macpo is better than GGQ today, and I feel there is little to argue there. sandroba pointed out how L is acting like in Ver's game, and I couldn't agree more. We also have Incog's analysis against L. Secondary suspects: Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees. These 3 people have garnered attention from a few people but not from everyone, so they are listed as secondary candidates. I am of the belief that all 3 of these people are mafia. evantrees is already mentioned by Incog. I think Cyber_Cheese highlighted a good summary of chaosquo here. Most of it is similar arguments to Macpo. Bill Murray as red? I think so. Others have cast suspicion but there's not been a full analysis anywhere. A few people have commented that the election "feels" weird in some way, and I definitely sympathize. The votes for Bill Murray come across as the most suspicious: lots of random votes there. Personally I was surprised he even got into office (remember I was out all day so I saw the results without reading the previous 20 pages). I do realize I may have initially pushed him into candidacy, but I shall take responsibility for that and see to it that he's lynched in the near future. But to be simple: Bill Murray posted a lot, and got into office. Since then he's been pretty passive at the helm (so has BC I realize). That's good enough reason to warrant a ton of suspicion, as he should be actively scumhunting and posting without fear at this point. Remaining mafia candidates: Jackal, Opz, kingjames, zeks. Incog has an analysis against Jackal as we know. I am not on board with him being mafia yet. Traditionally when he is mafia he posts paragraphs, and not one-liners. However he warrants suspicion for having an apathetic attitude. Opz is someone who I believe Sheth was the first to cast doubt on, and I must say Sheth is definitely onto something. I know of the past Opz as a town player who is aggressive, not afraid to call people out on their bullshit. That's something we aren't seeing much of this game. He's posted a few of his own thoughts, but there is a clear lack of effort. Bored townie who is facepalming at having to read 100 pages? Possibly. Mafia hiding in the shadows? Fits better. kingjames is called out on by Incog, and there's further analysis by BC. His last sentence is the perfect sum to kingjames: "The key thing to note is that in contrast to his town play where he is outgoing and analytical, his posts in this game are very subdued, seem artificial and feel overly planned." kingjames has yet to do anything to contradict this. zeks I felt strongly about yesterday, he made a bad post which is nothing like his normal outspoken attitude (though it's been a while since he's played I think). He has since asked for a replacement and hasn't posted, but should still be looked at in the future. Meapak_Ziphh is someone I would like to throw out there as a candidate (which shouldn't be a surprise from the few of my recent posts). What has Meapak done this game? Tried to get GGQ lynched, and unfortunately that's about all he's tried to do. There is a very aggressive push from him to kill this guy, which I find a little suspicious and slightly out of character. Mafia: Macpo, GGQ, L, Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees, Opz, Kingjames, Meapak_Ziphh. Substitute a few off candidates and I think we've found our 9: Jackal, BrownBear, zeks, Munk-E, other random inactive player goes here. DONT LOSE THIS POST ITS SO IMPORTANT! Writing all that I think the usefulness of this post is immediately made clear. The most prominent townies and the ones doing the analysis are all right on most of their reads. It's just each person has found 2-3 mafia on their own, and most of the time they are all different. Pooling this information together I realize it's hard to call anyone and their analysis wrong, as when you analyze the big picture everything fits together. Anyone in their right mind would look at this game and think "wow this atmosphere is perfect for the mafia". Ver once told me that lots of times it's easier to find the mafia when the town atmosphere sucks because they will not be the ones causing chaos and disruption. Instead they will be sitting on the sidelines enjoying the show while the townies flail around. Look at all the names I've listed above. Everyone (yes everyone on that list) is guilty of apathy and does not have the interests of the town in mind. They are not thinking long term, or analyzing the big picture. They aren't playing the game, they are watching. Macpo Many others have said so, and though I may be biased, I still think it's best we lynch him today. I believe his case is still by far the strongest we have at the moment, especially since he has responded to his threats (with even more reason to kill him). At the time of writing GGQ has yet to say anything. We kill him (Macpo) today and spend the night figuring out who has the next best case. In the meantime, I'm going to be looking for connections between the above players to see if anyone can be ruled out or automatically included. IF YOU HAVE FINISHED READING AND YOU ARE A COMPETENT TOWN PLAYER PLEASE READ AGAIN Also, after sifting through this information, I feel we have a strong enough lead to start killing like there's no tomorrow. ##Vote: double lynch I'd be happy including Toad and Schworz into this list and choosing two from it to lynch. Again the importance of what I'm saying here is lets keep it to these 8-9 and find a good reason for who we lynch. GGQ, L, Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees, Opz, Kingjames, Meapak_Ziphh, Toad, Schworz (This is already 10, but I'd like to lynch from this pile of candidates if possible) I feel like adding 1-2 to the list is fine, but I'd like to see it stay small so we can get the best reads from these people and choose correctly on who to lynch. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 19 2012 06:12 blahz0r wrote: Looking at the KP formula. I think that wouldn't be a bad idea on Mafia's part. Look at this scenario: He gets two of his teammates killed, that leaves 8/10 remaining. They have enough members to still kill every night and we fall into his trap of believing he is definitely town. I think if he gets another killed, dropping the Mafia KP by 1, that he would be safely deemed town. Still reading =x There are ways to become a "safely deemed town" person. However just because they find mafia like this doesn't make them town for sure. As long as he keeps finding Mafia its great, its townie. You just have to notice when peoples interests seem to change. Or their logic is different or they stop finding mafia. I don't think anyone is "safely deemed town" yet. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 19 2012 07:15 Jayjay54 wrote: This is no accusation whatsoever! just a new player question! is it good to distribute medics? because if I were scum, I'd probably not shoot them anymore. While you achieved to save those two lifes, the chance of a medic safe decreases, because medics will (likely) protect them (maybe they'd do anyway). So in what situations is it good to say things like that? Seriously, not arguing with your reasoning here, rather curious. Thanks Argue with there reasoning. Its wrong reasoning. Medics choose 4-5 people you think are safe and save one of them. If one of them happens to be Prot / Foolishness great. I think they are two good choices. However telling medics to only save those two is wrong. You want medics to have more WIFOM then two. I don't like this whole naming 2 people and force protecting them. Its almost like claiming we have two confirmed town. Now don't get me wrong, there reads are what have netted us two mafia and I think its great that you save them, but I think we(town) have a better chance of blocking a mafia shot if we don't say for sure who we are saving. Your logic is good BC, about our chances of a save decreasing. So, thats another reason I'm saying don't just blindly put your save on these two. If BC has been masoned with Prot this whole time, then they both should know not to say this. Even more reason not to put the save for sure on only Prot. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 19 2012 12:03 jcarlsoniv wrote: ![]() TL Mafia L: Day 3 Start Still no flavor text. Big whoop, wanna fight about it? L the Mafia Godfather (would check as Medic) has been killed. Liquid`Sheth the Vigilante has been killed. Adam4167 the Vigilante has been killed. Maxella and rtgICEMAN the Townies have been modkilled. Yea I wanna fight about it. GL guys! ![]() | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On January 19 2012 12:06 jcarlsoniv wrote: Mod note: Replacements will no longer be accepted seeing as we're already 3 days into the game. Those who can no longer participate will be promptly modkilled. Obs QT please? ![]() | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
![]() | ||
| ||