Pick Their Power Mafia 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
i.e. If you claim to have KP, then any KP that you may have had becomes unusable. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
and lol | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
If scum kill the person who wrote their role, they are free to claim anything. Better no one really knows who their creator is. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
It would be nice to get handle on what everyone is capable of, but this will just expose more powerful townies to roleblocks, kills, etc. My policy: Don't reveal someone's role unless they are lying. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
ON do you have one too because you are severely hinting that you do. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Makes one master of death. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Also, I'm pretty certain the items combination effect. The only apparent ability Sandroba is given is to give away the stick. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
What can you do with each individual item? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Then no one is lying! | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Also I did in no way claim Harry Potter | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 25 2011 11:16 sandroba wrote: ON, can you pls give jackal the wand or get lynched. Your choice. Why are you trusting Jackaal over ON? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
You are Scum. I'm pretty sure it's easy to infer the message for town | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:33 redFF wrote: erm because he said that the 3 objects were all horcruxes and the elder wand is the only stick horcrux i know of? Apparently you aren't knowledgeable enough. It's deathly hollows, not horcruxes. But ya, this is pretty general knowledge if you've read the books. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Kill him right now, no need to use up the lynch. If Jackal is the lynch, it's insanely easy for the mafia to hide behind their vote for Jackal. On July 25 2011 13:09 Amber[LighT] wrote: I would be in support of a YM or Jackal lynch. I'm fairly certain YM is not scum if Jackal flips red. He had to have known that killing ON would turn the town against Jackal. Why would scum allow YM to kill ON especially as ON was basically powerless? Also if he was scum, I feel he would have used the stealth kill instead and remain role hidden. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
ON's role post tells him to try and kill Harry Potter. I find it extremely hard to believe that a townie would be given instructions to kill someone in their exact same alignment ESPECIALLY as these two roles were deliberately created with the other mind. I believe deconduo placed Harry and Voldemort at opposing alignments. If Deconduo truly randomized the alignment of these two roles, why would he include that statement to kill Harry Potter? He would not have created Voldemort's role with wording that clearly has alignment in mind if he was just gonna randomize it. "You are Voldemort, and you are on a mission to kill Harry Potter and keep him from uniting the three Deathly Hallows. Each item you or Harry Potter obtain will grant the holder a power, but unfortunately you can only use one item per night." Can it be flavour text? Why is it so explicit for a flavour text? It's not telling him to merely compete with Harry Potter for night abilities, but to try and kill him. Just because it's not flavour text DOES NOT make it redundant. Redundant would be "you are on a mission to kill scum". His role provides him with a crucial clue: it provides him with the role name of a mafia/3rd party. Lucky for us, Jackal was happy enough to oblige and reveal his role. ON does not have a separate win condition, he shares his win condition with the rest of the town: to kill all scum. His role provides a clue, and it would be very imprudent to ignore it just because jackal's behavior doesn't match. I know I'm not going off behavior, but I feel like ON's role reveal is something too good to be passed on. I'd love to hear what jackal has to say. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 04:45 syllogism wrote: So you are admitting the role is likely confirmed. What exactly will mafia/third party supersoft do with his alignment checking role that town is forcing him to use? At worst we will be mislead, but we are always free to ignore his checks. At best he gives us red today. There's no risk at all unless it's a gambit and they are ALL red. Agree. If flip turns out red, then we lynch. If green, we take it as a grain of salt and potentially have a confirmed townie if supersoft is ever killed and flipped green. Also, either we kill jackal or we don't, but if we aren't, then I really think we should give him the stone and tell him to protect supersoft. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 04:57 BloodyC0bbler wrote: So let me get this straight, He finds a red, we lynch and go yay yay. If finds a green, announces it to thread, and then mafia kill confirmed town? How about we confirm SS, he then uses his power and only say, speaks up. It also requires, every single person in a day to do this with him, bulks up a thread to make it hard to read, and then him to accurately pick someone to check. Also you want to give another unconfirmed player a power? What is your deal this game. You have no way to make jackal prot SS. SS gets shot and flips town, jackal says "i proted him, he must have been double stacked" Jesus, do you people think at all? Role does not equal alignment. People who use kp related roles as town should be penalized. People who have roles that require manipulating a town to get power (see jackals role before he claimed), or people who seemingly require votes to use a power and are acting like trollbate to get it. You do not help these people, you make them useless. If they are sk or mafia they get gimped. If they are town they should understand and start analyzing players. This is not "lets use everyones powers and figure out who has what and then figure out who is red/sk" This is lets figure out whos mafia/sk. Trying to confirm someone based on potential use of a role that was claimed by them (could still be slightly different, hell the alignment could be different). I do not understand why we should be waiting till after SS is confirmed to take advantage of his role. First of all, I think there are far better dt check targets than SS. Second, it's pointless to wait for SS to be confirmed. His dt checks will be targets whether he's confirmed or not. We will be just wasting a day to get someone's alignment. Mafia KP is the same, if it's not the target it would have been someone else. But also remember having a confirmed townie not only focuses mafia KP but also protection roles. I say we abuse his role till he dies and do our utmost to protect him. The stone is the least helpful to the mafia. They can't predict who people will be shooting. And I sincerely hope people won't be vigi shooting people in the night. If we really want someone killed we can force jackal to give back the stone. This way at least SS gets an extra layer of protection. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Look think about it like this. 1. If we don't use the SS alignment check, then we get no "semi-confirmed" townie. Someone dies to Mafia KP anyways as mafia KP is not affected. 2. If we do use it, AT WORST CASE SCENARIO, this "semi-confirmed" townie dies. Worst case scenario, in both situations: dead townie, no confirmed townie alive. Best case scenario, if we don't use SS: dead townie, no confirmed townie alive. Best case scenario, if we do use SS: dead townie, confirmed townie alive. OR BETTER YET medic protects the confirmed townie wasting mafia KP. If we don't use the alignment check it'll be like the mafia killing the "semi-confirmed" anyways. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
At this point, I am just completely uncertain about jackal. If we are willing to give jackal the benefit of the doubt, don't leave him completely powerless. Give him the stone. How does this help mafia night 1? No townies should be shooting each other in the night at this point. Mafia can not predict who the SK will be killing. If we are willing to trust him enough to not kill him, the stone has a lot of upside for town if jackal is town and very miniscule downside if he's mafia. We can always force him to give it back after night 1. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Just the stone. He cant threaten anyone with the stone. And i doubt town will be announcing who their killing. If that happens and town agrees on a night kill, we TAKE THE STONE. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
![]() ![]() While the upside of giving Jackal, the town, ![]() ![]() | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 04:50 heist wrote: Agree. If flip turns out red, then we lynch. If green, we take it as a grain of salt and potentially have a confirmed townie if supersoft is ever killed and flipped green. Also, either we kill jackal or we don't, but if we aren't, then I really think we should give him the stone and tell him to protect supersoft. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 06:25 Foolishness wrote: I am in favor of using the check, but BC's arguments are looking better and better as time goes on. If we can't agree on the check then I'm totally envisioning a scenario where supersoft comes back and goes "oh hey I checked random person X because random person Y said so" and we can't hold him accountable because we as a town did not agree on who to check. I have slammed my head against my desk so many times reading the thread at the stupidity of players that I'm going to die of blood loss at this rate. I don't want that. We use the ![]() Are you kidding me? How is his argument getting better and better? SS using his check gives us NO NEGATIVES. Who cares if he just says town? If he flips green, we'll have a load of confirmed townies. Even if town argues about the dt target, if SS even checks one of them, we'll be good. ITS BETTER THAN NOTHING. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Please read my argument about the confirmed townie bit if you are still arguing about that. I swear if you are doing this to make people think scum won't be vehemently arguing against something so pro-town, I will be very annoyed. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
You are purposefully being stubborn to make yourself look suspicious to make scum go. "Oh hey, BC has half the town thinking he's scum. Let's leave him alone." /joke but seriously your only negative is that town will be stupid and misuse the information. That is not a good reason to not use the dt checks. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Not possible to analyze with any real depth based on what he's posted. Just suspicious enough to make you wonder. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
To reiterate: If jackal is town, ADVANTAGE: He gets to protect somebody. DISADVANTAGE: None. If Jackal is scum, ADVANTAGE: None. DISADVANTAGE: He has a chance to save his scum buddy. BUT think about it. What are the chances he correctly predicts who's getting targeted by the 3rd Party? That's if the 3rd Party happens to hit mafia. Town shouldn't be shooting on whims anyway. If we all agree to night vigi someone, we can take away the stone. This is only for night 1. I don't trust him, but if town allows him to live then I suggest we give him the protective ability. Right now the risks are very small if he's scum, and good payout if he's town. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
The real question you should be asking yourself is "Is the possibility of a townie getting the med kit worth the risk of mafia getting it?" I say yes. Night 1 is not the time to be shooting at possible mafia targets if you are town. There is a very slim chance jackal correctly predicts the SK, if SK happens to shoot mafia. Pretend it like this if you don't like this situation. Deconduo comes down and gives us the option of giving one random player a med kit. We are all told who it is given to. And we can take it back at any time if we want to. Would you agree? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
You are not confirmed townie. And just because you are confirmed townie does not give you super accurate scum reads. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:48 Nisani201 wrote: It doesn't matter if you give someone the elder wand anyways. For someone to properly use the elder wand, said person must kill its last owner. So ON would have to kill sandroba to use it. On July 25 2011 10:56 Nisani201 wrote: There is probably a Snape, and in that case we should wait the whole Harry Potter/Voldemort thing out until Snape claims. He has not been doing anything pro-town at all this game. He is semi-lurking and from time to time, he pitches in a few lines of pure speculation or other worthless 1 liners. He has not tried to analyze anyone or tried to contribute to any town discussion. In fact his only convictions are his lynch votes which he hastily votes for with pretty much no analysis. On July 25 2011 12:27 Nisani201 wrote: Ugh, first I have redFF being a hero in Vigi mafia and shooting someone in the first hour of vigi mafia, and now I have this? Ugh, whatever. youngminii is probably scum, because he, you know, KILLED A TOWNIE ON THE SPOT. ##Vote youngminii On July 26 2011 10:13 Nisani201 wrote: BC is suspicious, but not just for trying to avoid an alignment check. This post I found particularly scummy: The above post was extremely uninformed and looked like it was trying to start a bandwagon. That, in addition to the reasons I stated earlier in this post, I think that BC is the best lynch. ##Vote: Bloodyc0bbler Not only is he not contributing, he is very willing to throw his vote to any bandwagon and to anyone that he feels safe voting for. Look at his post concerning BC. He states that BC is suspicious. OK, now let's see your reasoning. He brings up one post with BC providing his reasoning to lynch Jackal. It's curious to see him use "trying to start a bandwagon" as an excuse as that is exactly what he is doing. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
What bothers me about your vote for BC is your main reason is something he did before this entire fiasco with the dt checks. Why didn't you come out before? Why wait till BC has argued with a lot of the town and only vote to lynch after Curu did so? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:23 Nisani201 wrote: Would you prefer me to vote for someone I don't feel safe voting for? Because that makes no sense. Safe as in you think you will not receive any backlash from your vote, not safe as in your convictions. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
EDWOP Were the alignments influenced in any way by role for anyone? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:15 deconduo wrote: All alignments, including any possible godfathers, were RNGd/assigned by me and eiii. If mafia have godfathers they were pre-determined. My vote is clear. ##Vote: jackal58 | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:15 deconduo wrote: All alignments, including any possible godfathers, were RNGd/assigned by me and eiii. If mafia have godfathers they were pre-determined. Keyword here: assigned. I really want to stress that. Some people's alignments were randomly generated. Some people's alignments were assigned by the hosts. And who would have their alignments assigned? I don't know, maybe HARRY POTTER AND VOLDEMORT. I don't like the argument that the Jackal lynch is only based off flavour text. This is what deconduo has to say about flavour text. On July 25 2011 22:28 deconduo wrote: There are no alternative win conditions. You win with your alignment only. Anything that suggests otherwise in roles is just flavour. And here is the part of ON's role that is relevant: "You are Voldemort, and you are on a mission to kill Harry Potter and keep him from uniting the three Deathly Hallows. Each item you or Harry Potter obtain will grant the holder a power, but unfortunately you can only use one item per night. ON is town. He does not have an alternate win condition to the rest of us. He wins with town. Is the part of the role telling him to kill Harry Potter "suggesting otherwise"? NO. This isn't flavour text. It is a clue, the role name of someone either 3rd party/scum. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 27 2011 05:34 supersoft wrote: I wanted to fakeclaim a check on kita and say that he turned red if BCs check returned green. unfortunately kita wasn't around and BC returned red. please do not EVER LIE TO US | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
But if the mafia are prepared to give us a 1 for 1 trade, then I'm willing to follow through. If you end up miller however, I can't really see how that faults SS. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
For the 1/1 trade with mafia. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 27 2011 05:48 Mr. Wiggles wrote: I did read, but if you think he's town, and SS is scum, why not just go for a 0-1 trade with mafia? Why do you need to kill BC when you don't think he's scum? That makes no sense at all. SS is a daily day time DT check. If BC's role trumps that in helping town I will switch over to SS. Also, I may not feel like BC is scum, but I also never got any scum vibes from SS. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Not even their alignment? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Oh and I never wanted the dt check on BC. I'd much rather have preferred kita or jackal. I'm not asking anyone to think that I'm town because i pulled my vote, but don't take it as a scum move to appear town. End of the day, it seemed ridiculous that I was voting to lynch someone that I really did not believe was scum. So I changed my vote. Oh and if you have a medic role, someone please cover supersoft. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
![]() | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Either kita or nisani are my two biggest suspicions right now. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 28 2011 06:42 sandroba wrote: Foolishness/Drazerk/chaos13 are all good lynches to me. If there's a day vig hit one of these guys. Do you think these are better lynch targets than kita and nisani? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
1. He is not particularly active or contributing much to town discussion. But this applies to other people in the game. In fact most of Foolishness' posts have been accusing others of this very reason. He seems determined Lanaia, redFF, wiggles, and kita are scummy. However, not too much thought has gone into it. Is he trying to reduce the attention on his own back or genuinely trying to pressure them into being more active? 2. He is on Kita the entire time for not contributing much and lurking. But he then puts his final vote on redFF for "trolling". Perhaps kita's willingness to submit to a dt check made him not so suspicious? 3. Opposed both the jackal lynch and the BC lynch.I guess this is noncommittal if you look at it that way. Or perhaps he really doesn't believe in the reasoning of either lynches. 4. Doesn't like the mass role claiming, but heavily hints at his own. Basically telling vigs that it's a bad idea to target him. Obviously a more scum oriented motivation, but really inconclusive as to determining his alignment. All in all, as you can probably tell, I'm still quite undecided on him. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
I think is no way mafia would agree to use their vig shot on redFF. Thus I think Lanaia is either town or 3rd party. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
I would really like more town opinion on him and I also HIGHLY RECOMMEND not rashly use their day vigs just yet. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 28 2011 07:45 Varpulis wrote: k then i won't reveal any more of Lanaia's role, past her kp capabilities. No sane scum would kill RedFF last night, in my mind. Lanaia is not compulsive: On the contrary, she cannot shoot again until night three. She has two shots. "I won't reveal any more of her role." Proceeds to reveal more of her role. hahaha | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
![]() | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
![]() | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 05:35 Foolishness wrote: Thanks for making me immune to death the rest of the game bro...I ![]() | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
If he's to be the lynch, he'll be taken care of. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
I'm not really clearly understanding the votes on Chaos. It seems like he made an analysis, he was wrong, and now he's being voted. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 29 2011 04:22 Foolishness wrote: First vote on Jackal Post against kitaman: As far as I'm concerned, it's meaningless comparing it to the first vote. The timing of your post would be a lot more convincing if you posted it before ON's flip. After his flip, YM, redFF, amber, and myself were all prepared to lynch/kill Jackal. This is all before your post defending him. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 29 2011 04:38 Foolishness wrote: A bunch of his arguments are that I diverted discussion away from Jackal lynched. That's not true. I said why I thought he was suspicious, then others ran around voting for him without providing just reason besides "foolishness is right". Hunting inactives is what I do best. Go read my past games I'll even find them for you if you desire. You NEVER said he was suspicious. In fact, you did the complete opposite. You defended him saying mafia would never role claim day 1. I'm not even comprehending how you can say everyone voted for him because of you. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:37 chaos13 wrote: Well I was reading through the thread and was ready to tell everyone to shut up about voldemort/hallows but that conversation seems to have ended, in a comfortably brutal fashion. The things I think about what went on now: Jackal58, Harry Potter The question raised now is whether or not the Voldemort/Potter duo is like Joker/Batman was in PTP 1. Is role a reflection of alignment in this case? It would have been natural to think voldy was mafia, but that turned out completely incorrect. It is also possible that they are both town aligned. This remains to be seen. A question I want to put forward is: Should we get Jackal to use the wand in the same way that ON was going to? A double lynch either today or tomorrow? This could prove to be a powerful tool, and is worth considering. Sandroba, keeper of the wand My big question is why was he willing to hand out a KP so early on day 1? Unless he knew ON was town somehow, but with the deal of it being handed back to him, that seems highly unlikely. At first I would say he is town, because he was ready to hand the wand over to someone who flipped town instead of someone on his scum team. But then...nobody says that the keepers of the hallows and the collectors have to be on the same team. We really have no guarantee of this either way, but if we see Sand flip before Jackal, we can rest assured that they are not mafia together or Potter would have the wand now. In conclusion, I'm uncertain on him. This business has introduced a lot of wifom around Sand, and I've really got nowhere in writing out my thought process on him. Curu, the naive planner It's already been explained why this is a bad idea, and I agree with that wholeheartedly. This benefits scum far more than town, since they could eliminate mason or vigilante roles. However, as I often find myself pointing out, bad plan =/= scum. Based on this I think Curu is more likely town than mafia. If mafia were to propose a plan as high-profile as this, they would have thought it through and discussed it with their scumbuddies first, and it would not have ended up posted. But seriously Curu, don't push this plan. It doesn't help us. redFF, the....redFF This post makes me really uneasy. He asks for a KP with no explanation. Maybe he has a role that he can use it, or maybe he just wanted to hold on to it so it couldn't be used improperly. This one as well. He accuses a now-confirmed townie, and tries to get him to claim. Couple this with his asking for the wand, it makes me think he also might have an HP themed role and would be capable of using it. What remains to be seen is whether this role is town aligned or not. At the moment I have no strong reads on any other players. Hopefully I'll have more time tomorrow to read and do some proper analysis. Something I really don't want to happen is that everyone gets wrapped up in the theme roles of this game. At the heart of it, it's a simple game of mafia. At no point in the game should role/HP mechanics come before good analysis. I realize that in my thoughts above I focused a lot on HP, and as you can see it only led to a lot of wifom. I will be doing my best to move away from this in the future and on to analysis based more in behavior. and On July 25 2011 13:57 Tackster wrote: Calling the 3 Deathly Hallows examples of horcruxes is like calling Gandalf's asshole the one true ring. If we keep fucking up Harry Potter lore hear i'm going to call J.K.Rowling and then everyone will be sorry! Apart from that I was shocked to see that day kill! Days are 48 hours long - surely sandroba having a stick up his...attic... is not worth 3 roleclaims, a day shot and the beginnings of a bandwagon. Chaos13 seems to be the only one who's done any analysis as opposed to 'i just read everything so do what i say'. I myself haven't analysed much but seeing as I can't sleep i'll go back and try and generate a proper timeline of events... Everyone take a chill pill and wash it done with some methodone... Chaos stressing essentially we stop pursuing jackal. He tentatively surmises that HP and Voldemort can both be town. Starts testing the waters about giving him the wand. Then starts to put suspicion on Sandroba for giving him the wand. Basically ends with "don't let roles affect your decision at all". Tackster with the same mentality: we want no talk of roles, stop pursuing jackal. Subtly(actual not so subtle) trying to increase Chaos' town legitimacy. Both emphasize the need for behavioral analysis and to ignore roles completely. But what does jackal do(forced to or not)? Stay away so we can't do that either. We also have Foolishness arguing essentially the same thing. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
"every game i plau with sandroba he makes plan day 1 everyone sez stfu" pure gold. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
THANKS FOR MAKING MY ROLE COMPLETELY USELESS. I"M GOING TO KILL YOU. NOW EVEN KURUMI HAS A BETTER ROLE THAN ME. You are the Puppetmaster. At the start of the game you can attach strings to a target and he will become your puppet. Any action done against you specifically will be done to your puppet instead. For example, if you get DT checked, your puppet's role will appear, and if you get night hit or mafia hit, then your puppet will instead take the hit. Any abilities used on your puppet will not be redirected. At any time, you can cut the strings on your puppet resulting in his death. However this will reveal you to everyone as the Puppetmaster. In the event of your puppets death you will be unable to get a new one. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
I wasn't going to kill him until there was town majority. And as the leader of the lynch, I didn't want to let my powers go to waste. So I gave town a double lynch essentially. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 30 2011 07:07 Lanaia wrote: I thought it was a crumb and I was confused to all hell as to what it would mean. May I ask, do we think Foolishness was being honest about him being roleblocked? Remember that I might have been the target and it transferred onto Foolishness. Or he could be lying. Or someone not-scum did actually target him. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
With so many claims scattered throughout I found it helpful to compile. This is the claim list for the night (if i can get curu and drazerk that would be great): sandroba- no action; visited only by chaos palmar - watched/tracked chaos. (chaos tried to kill sandroba. DB roleblock chaos) DB- roleblock chaos chaos - protect sandroba bumatlarge- roleblock lanaia lanaia - no action; roleblocked varpulis - no action (*prophecy) kurumi - no action heist - no action kita- no action drazerk- curu - *Prophecy: (one of them is true) 1. kitaman killed amber (kita says is lie) 2. sandroba induct amber (sandroba says is lie) 3. amber visited chaos (Palmar says is lie) (4. vapulis is lying about everything) ACCOUNTABILITY Palmar is lying or Chaos is lying. Kita is lying or Palmar is lying (I trust sandroba) unless varpulis is lying. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Chaos were you roleblocked? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
The choice is still pretty much a 50/50. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 31 2011 15:20 Curu wrote: No, but one Mafia member almost certainly had a daykill that was used on supersoft. Someone is lying about their role, but it doesn't appear to be Palmar. True. I'll vote for chaos for now. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
I want my stone back. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 28 2011 05:29 Kurumi wrote: I was hoping for posting restriction and You know what My role might not work that's so funny I am the Oracle. Every night I might target someone and their role will be revealed upon my death. I can change targets every night. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On August 02 2011 09:33 Trotske wrote: I would be for this plan on like day 3 with a sniper using the second shot because by then we would have a lot more info to make a better choice on who to shoot and if we do kill a townie with it by accident it would give us even more info. On August 02 2011 09:46 Trotske wrote: If you use the sniper as a second lynch but don't have him claim until he is out of kills he can't get taken out until he is just a normal townie. And since the sniper would be acting on the towns behalf it would show you who was pushing really hard for the vig shot on a townie. and let you reexamine what the townie who got shot had said because he was now a confirmed townie. Varpulis has a right to be suspicious. I don't know why he isn't being so heavily pressured for this plan. He is asking the sniper to kill someone night 1 based solely on his gut reads and not claim the kill at all. Not to mention the fact that with a possibility of more than 1 vig, it'll be hell to sort out the day post. Also town will not be held accountable since we will not be voting on who to kill. All the drawbacks of an early vig hit with none of the upsides of a confirmed townie or information from the votes. Will waiting till the sniper is a vanilla townie do him any good at surviving? No. He argues to wait till day 3 for the confirmed townie. But he still advocates an early vig hit. It's like taking the worst of both worlds: early vig hit, later/delayed confirmed townie, no way of protecting the confirmed townie anyways. And his reasoning? He reiterates the merits of a double lynch, which does us no good. It doesn't support his alternate plan in any way in comparison to the original. On August 03 2011 03:34 Trotske wrote: you don't want the day vig to claim before the town has agreed to the plan (Which they havn't) or until we know where we want the dayvig to aim. Clear contradiction here. He doesn't want the day vig to claim before we know where we want the dayvig to aim. Yet he's totally fine with the sniper shooting someone on his own night 1? On August 02 2011 23:07 Trotske wrote: As you will know from this post If a day vig trys to hit someone and they survive we have no way of knowing if they are both scum or a vig / vet . No idea if you weren't reading the posts or just scum trying to slip this idea in to see if anyone would catch it. FoS Lucidity He makes a very very weak FoS accusation. He doesn't simply try to correct his misunderstanding but capitalizes on it to push forward a lynch based on very shaky foundations. His entire reasoning is based off one thought. His entire suspicions rest solely through the interpretation that this one thought is a sneaky attempt to push scum agendas. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
srysry | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Only two people can roleblock: dropbear and bum. Kita claims rb. Bum claims rb. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On August 03 2011 07:15 Curu wrote: I am hidden vote/self Vet/self Watcher/role check/all KP Healer now. For whoever asked for all my powers. And all I get is a very conditional vig/vet ability that cancels each other out. What did you do last night? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Roleblock protection can only occur on even nights. This isn't even possible. Put your vote on bum. Thanks. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On August 03 2011 09:00 Palmar wrote: Oh you great master of the rainbow, share with us your wisdom. Have you found the sun yet, or does the sun remain hidden. Once the sun is found I will be able to cast another spell? But who is the sun? You are the sun, Palmar. The magnificent orb of light that sees all, knows all. Casting rainbows with his light. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Third option of course is dropbear and kita are scum which wouldn't surprise me at all. But simplest, bum is scum. It rhymes so that's automatic +1 cred. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
Very ominous indeed. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
![]() Shoulda killed bum first. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
| ||