Community Feedback Update - October 15 - Page 5
Forum Index > Legacy of the Void |
Allred
United States352 Posts
| ||
Spirit_76
8 Posts
these feedbacks are a waste of time. blizzard is not listening, the game has A LOT of issues and they say the game is fine!! wtf??? i think pvz is in a terrible state, i think lukers are op, so is parasite bomb. msc should be removed. the new chronoboost sucks. disruptors are terrible, maybe the worst unit ever. the adept was suppossed to be a core unit, and its a useless unit vs zerg and vs terran is good very early game, then again its useless. protoss is a mess, now with this feeback i have lost all hope of this game being better. they wont change a thing. this beta was a waste of time, no changed on the economy, why not try something different?? why not try 8 workers instead of 12?? why not??? why not try more thing on MM?? why not try more things with protoss?? its really sad, nothing has change, LOTV will be boring as HOTS after maybe 1 year. AND NOTHING ABOUT THE CHAT SYSTEM, blizzard is lost. | ||
CptMarvel
France236 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
On October 16 2015 07:11 [PkF] Wire wrote: I think it's a huge downgrade from HotS. LotV is different enough from HotS upon release that it gives consumers a real choice between 2 decently supported RTS games. And LotV will only get more and more different from HotS as Blizz has promised at WCS-Poland and as they will outline at Blizzcon. so i'm a happy camper and looking forward to November 10th. On October 16 2015 02:50 WrathSCII wrote: Infestor The main goal for the Infestor is not to have the unit see play in every single game of every matchup, but we want this caster to be powerful in specific strategies or scenarios. i hope this is where the infestor ends up... as a highly specialized spell caster On October 16 2015 02:50 WrathSCII wrote:Highest level pros generally don’t play in the beta as we’ve seen in both LotV and HotS betas what about Avilo? | ||
Fran_
United States1024 Posts
On October 16 2015 07:50 Spirit_76 wrote: AND NOTHING ABOUT THE CHAT SYSTEM, blizzard is lost. I agree. I heard LoL is a good game. You can try that now. | ||
Little-Chimp
Canada948 Posts
| ||
Beliskner
111 Posts
On October 16 2015 07:50 Spirit_76 wrote: we shouldnt buy this game. On October 16 2015 08:10 CptMarvel wrote: Yeah... I'm not buying this game Good, just STFU and just go away then. | ||
Spyridon
United States997 Posts
On October 16 2015 05:48 Hider wrote: Terran would transition into mech as a resposponse. Not sure if you realize i was referring to BW, but unless u are talking about spider mines, mech can't do anything to an ultra with dark swarm. Anyway, my point was, I think DK implementing strategies that are near possible to beat if a race gets to late game, is to emulate the reason people figured out such strict timings in BW over the years. | ||
Espartaquen
88 Posts
| ||
Creager
Germany1894 Posts
On October 16 2015 07:30 FLuE wrote: Seriously how many times have they said in these community updates, "We heard your feedback..." and I know it is going to be followed by a change that HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT FEEDBACK. Kinda feel the same about these updates now, and I personally think as well that this beta period for LotV is a huge series of disappointments, wrong moves and missed opportunities, which leaves me as uninterested in the upcoming multiplayer as I've never been throughout SC2's lifecycle. Of course Blizzard has to sell a product so them acting positively about the state of the game is understandable, but honestly, I'm tired of hearing big promises again leaving players deluded and disappointed, of course they will continue to balance multiplayer after release, but that's something I expect them to do regardless of this whole PR. As a huge Blizzard fan over the years I certainly noticed a change in their business policy, and unfortunately not for the better, I fear, feels a lot more like "cash grab" nowadays and LotV with that pushed release date greatly lines up with that. They could and should've done so much more with this beta, instead they've spend months over re-re-half-reverting macro mechanics, yet possible economy changes (or reverts) were out of the picture RIGHT off the bat... What happened to "the game is done, when it's done"? I miss those days. | ||
WhaleOFaTale
46 Posts
In Troy the movie fashion "I say we make them [LOTV dominance], wait a little longer!" Or until LOTV has some serious changes | ||
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
| ||
WhaleOFaTale
46 Posts
On October 16 2015 09:07 Creager wrote: Kinda feel the same about these updates now, and I personally think as well that this beta period for LotV is a huge series of disappointments, wrong moves and missed opportunities, which leaves me as uninterested in the upcoming multiplayer as I've never been throughout SC2's lifecycle. Of course Blizzard has to sell a product so them acting positively about the state of the game is understandable, but honestly, I'm tired of hearing big promises again leaving players deluded and disappointed, of course they will continue to balance multiplayer after release, but that's something I expect them to do regardless of this whole PR. As a huge Blizzard fan over the years I certainly noticed a change in their business policy, and unfortunately not for the better, I fear, feels a lot more like "cash grab" nowadays and LotV with that pushed release date greatly lines up with that. They could and should've done so much more with this beta, instead they've spend months over re-re-half-reverting macro mechanics, yet possible economy changes (or reverts) were out of the picture RIGHT off the bat... What happened to "the game is done, when it's done"? I miss those days. Couldn't agree more. This expansion needs ATLEAST another 6 months of work, but they HAVE TO HAVE IT RELEASED AT BLIZZCON. I don't know if it blizzard making these greedy moves, or the work of their owner-activision | ||
Dvriel
607 Posts
How can an employee(DK) announce some objectives(make Mech in TvP viable) for the new game(Hots) , not do it and still keep his job??? WTF? What kind of boss does he got? I want him. Doing my job so fucking bad, fail so loud, everybody sees it every single day and nothing matters??? REALLY? What are you doing people? You want me to play LoL or some CoD? CS? Why dont just give up and let the game to sombody else. 10.11.2015 will be the last SC game in history. One year ago there were 10 000 viewers for Demuslim. Today we got barely 1000...90% less. You want to tell me the game is balance because my ladder is 50/50? REALLY?? I am Diamond. I die to master y high Diamond, but crush Low and mid Diamond. How could my wirate not being 50/50? Its impossible. When you win too much you face better enemies. When you lose too much, you face worse. So you keep there. Watch the fucking streams Blizz. Avilo no hands victory with BL/Viper or mass carriers. Five featured SC streamers?? How is it possible there are ALWAYS more BW streamers than SC2?? Is this normal? Imagine everybody got iphone9 in the shop, but preffer to buy the iphone1. Is this normal? SHAME blizz SHAME. Thank you very much for fucking the best RTS in the world. Will be waiting to buy LotV when its only 10€ or less only to play the campaign and will be waiting for ATLAS. | ||
Creager
Germany1894 Posts
On October 16 2015 09:10 WhaleOFaTale wrote: Couldn't agree more. This expansion needs ATLEAST another 6 months of work, but they HAVE TO HAVE IT RELEASED AT BLIZZCON. I don't know if it blizzard making these greedy moves, or the work of their owner-activision Don't know, though activision sure plays it's part in that. Unlike their cash cows (formerly) WoW and (now) Hearthstone SC2 is all about single copies sold so their incentive isn't too great to postpone a release any further, especially with singleplayer done already (roughly 50% of the playerbase/customers buy SC2 solely for the campaign). But by doing that they approvingly accept potential harm to their hardcore player base (essentially us, who probably will be the only ones left still playing this game in a few years). | ||
rauk
United States2228 Posts
On October 16 2015 05:48 Hider wrote: Terran would transition into mech as a resposponse. mass science vessel was pretty good vs defilers and ultras, playing SK terran was still viable against ultra ling defiler | ||
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
| ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
On October 16 2015 07:32 sd_andeh wrote: It's funny how he whines about an adept drop 'while dropping as terran'. I don't think he realizes the devastation a 1-2 medivac drop can have on economy if you don't respond accordingly. If you don't respond to an adept drop, and you're out of position, you deserve losing your entire mineral line. Such a weird whine. People are very out of touch after being used to bio strength for 5.5 years - they don't want a rebalanced bio or for protoss to have the same capabilities without relying on tier 2.5 - 3.5 units. Bio destroys gateway when upgrades and higher supplies kick in and that's just a way of life - i had hoped that it would be changed in Legacy with rebalanced low and high tier options for both sides but it only partially happened. I think adept attack doing splash so it could be strong vs med-large numbers of low health units and weaker in lower numbers should have been there from the start | ||
xTJx
Brazil419 Posts
| ||
Solar424
United States4001 Posts
| ||
| ||