• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:22
CEST 19:22
KST 02:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202540Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up5LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced55
StarCraft 2
General
Clem Interview: "PvT is a bit insane right now" Serral wins EWC 2025 Would you prefer the game to be balanced around top-tier pro level or average pro level? Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up How to leave Master league - bug fix?
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers? Help, I can't log into staredit.net How do the new Battle.net ranks translate? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine 9/11 Anniversary Possible Al Qaeda Attack on 9/11
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 533 users

[Patch 4.3] Vel'Koz General Discussion - Page 69

Forum Index > LoL General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 133 Next
EU LCS Week 8 Review
phyvo
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States5635 Posts
March 07 2014 15:31 GMT
#1361
On March 08 2014 00:22 739 wrote:
Team builder is for normal games or ranked as well ?


Team builder is an entirely separate queue that if I read correctly acts like BP normals when you get in. Since it's a separate queue though you will only be paired against other team builder teams.
"BE A MANGO TO SLEEP LIKE A SNORING TIGER" - Monte
Alaric
Profile Joined November 2009
France45622 Posts
March 07 2014 15:35 GMT
#1362
It's basically a secondary blind normals queue for now (it has its own MMR apparently, which isn't Elo but based on how much you've played the position (top, mid, bot, etc.) and the champion (they used the example of "if you've played a bunch of Annie support and then go play her mid it'll obviously treat it as different, though if you only play Ryze mid and Annie support the day you play Annie mid you'll be considered proficient")).
Cant take LMS hipsters serious.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
March 07 2014 15:39 GMT
#1363
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

Of course its poker. Last season c9 lost 3 games, and in two of those they guy first blooded pre 130 because of clever nonstandard wards.
Freeeeeeedom
Sponkz
Profile Joined May 2011
Denmark4564 Posts
March 07 2014 15:41 GMT
#1364
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.



Perfect play is near impossible. I like to think of it, as how you manage to execute the strategy of the 5 picks you decided to go for. At professional level it is determined by a mixture of coordination and setup. You have 3 phases of the game (early, mid, late-game). Judging the development of the scene, it's clear to see how much of an impact some teams can get by making "perfect plays" early-game with a late-game composition and thereby completely shutting down the enemy team's chances of winning, resulting in those ridiculous early-deny where one team will be 11 kills up with 4-5 towers, 2-3 drakes while the enemy team has like 1 tower, no drakes and 3-4 kills (and those kills are usually random shut downs, when the winning team overextend ).
hi
Dark_Chill
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada3353 Posts
March 07 2014 15:47 GMT
#1365
Just to be sure about this whole discussion, perfect play only involved very loose perfect decision making, right? Like only with what they know, not perfect assumptions they make to make the best possible play?
CUTE MAKES RIGHT
Zess
Profile Joined July 2012
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
March 07 2014 15:53 GMT
#1366
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

I take the even stronger approach that Goumindong objects to precisely for the reason that economists (and I say this having done research at the Chicago Booth School of Business) + Show Spoiler +
herpa derp lets drop credentials because that's how you prove your point in an argument right herpaderpa
are mostly garbage.

Sure, just as in poker, there are strong expected value plays, but that by no means is any standard of ideal or perfect play. My reference to stability is that League is a very nonlinear game, with slight perturbations in conditions having a much greater influence on the outcome of the game such that the notion of trying to define perfect play is very much meaningless. From the standpoint of a omniscient time-dilating observer, maybe it would be appropriate to ascertain the "perfect" or even "best" play in the situation (ignoring the fact that most omniscient time-dilating observers are awful at this game), but that's completely removed from being able to create those decision and execute them in game, where even given perfect execution and instantaneous rational decision making, the tail error in expectation assessment is going to run any semblance of "perfect play" out of the zoo.
Administrator@TL_Zess
| (• ◡•)|八 (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
Ketara
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States15065 Posts
March 07 2014 16:01 GMT
#1367
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?
http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/lol-general/502075-patch-61-league-of-legends-general-discussion?page=25#498
Kyrie
Profile Joined June 2013
1594 Posts
March 07 2014 16:16 GMT
#1368
i have a copy of freakonomics somewhere, and from my standpoint there are very clearly bad, probably okay, and very good plays. it's pretty much impossible to identify the 'perfect' play out of the available very good plays for the same reason that climate change models are notoriously difficult and i should mention that i've also seen the day after tomorrow at least three times
Alaric
Profile Joined November 2009
France45622 Posts
March 07 2014 16:18 GMT
#1369
Beaten by Barrier for individual purposes (lower cd, higher value, as long as you only use it in situations where the shield will be popped you're winning out), not worth replacing the duo laner's combat summoner spell (Exhaust/Ignite) in duo lanes.

Supposed to have higher pay-off against AoE teamcomps during teamfights, but look at Locket's and Soraka's popularity and... well... yeah.
Cant take LMS hipsters serious.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35150 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 16:19:27
March 07 2014 16:18 GMT
#1370
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.
Fusilero
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom50293 Posts
March 07 2014 17:03 GMT
#1371
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?
Glorious SEA doto
Jek
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark2771 Posts
March 07 2014 17:06 GMT
#1372
Holy cow. Frost Queen's Claim is stupid. 36m game, 1k+ gold more generated than Thresh's Talisman, I even got it super late. -.-

Next item on the nerf board?
It's Elo not ELO - Every statiscian playing League
VayneAuthority
Profile Joined October 2012
United States8983 Posts
March 07 2014 17:09 GMT
#1373
i think it just adds more viability to support so it isn't too bad. a hook or leona can still instawin the game at any point, so good to see that AP can be viable as support too, and they def need more gold to maintain the same power level as our favorite way too CC heavy friends bot
I come in for the scraps
Sponkz
Profile Joined May 2011
Denmark4564 Posts
March 07 2014 17:15 GMT
#1374
On March 08 2014 02:06 Jek wrote:
Holy cow. Frost Queen's Claim is stupid. 36m game, 1k+ gold more generated than Thresh's Talisman, I even got it super late. -.-

Next item on the nerf board?


Sona OP woohoo.
hi
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35150 Posts
March 07 2014 17:15 GMT
#1375
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
March 07 2014 17:16 GMT
#1376
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35150 Posts
March 07 2014 17:20 GMT
#1377
On March 08 2014 02:16 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh

Top Wukong going Brutaliser=>Vamp=>Avarice Blade=>Warden's Mail

Every game regardless of matchup.
Fusilero
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 17:24:28
March 07 2014 17:21 GMT
#1378
On March 08 2014 02:20 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:16 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh

Top Wukong going Brutaliser=>Vamp=>Avarice Blade=>Warden's Mail

Every game regardless of matchup.

The avarice blade is smart yo, he's fallen behind get the gold flowing to comeback. He is truly the next level theorycrafter god bless.
http://en.intelextrememasters.com/news/yet-more-stars-to-see-you-through-katowice/
Caster line up announced for IEM
Sjokz/Joe Miller/Deman/Krepo/Froggen/Deficio.....quikshot.
Glorious SEA doto
Goumindong
Profile Joined February 2013
United States3529 Posts
March 07 2014 17:26 GMT
#1379
On March 08 2014 00:53 xes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

I take the even stronger approach that Goumindong objects to precisely for the reason that economists (and I say this having done research at the Chicago Booth School of Business) + Show Spoiler +
herpa derp lets drop credentials because that's how you prove your point in an argument right herpaderpa
are mostly garbage.

Sure, just as in poker, there are strong expected value plays, but that by no means is any standard of ideal or perfect play. My reference to stability is that League is a very nonlinear game, with slight perturbations in conditions having a much greater influence on the outcome of the game such that the notion of trying to define perfect play is very much meaningless. From the standpoint of a omniscient time-dilating observer, maybe it would be appropriate to ascertain the "perfect" or even "best" play in the situation (ignoring the fact that most omniscient time-dilating observers are awful at this game), but that's completely removed from being able to create those decision and execute them in game, where even given perfect execution and instantaneous rational decision making, the tail error in expectation assessment is going to run any semblance of "perfect play" out of the zoo.


Bullshit. Just because a game is unsolved doesn't mean that there is no answer. And just because a game has systems which are not stationary does not mean that defining perfect play is meaningless. I cannot even begin to imagine why "stuff that happens early in the game has disproportionate impact" would mean "might as well throw your hands up you can't get better"

Chess for example is a game in which "there is no standard of ideal or perfect play" by your definition. The game isn't solved, there is no underlying reason why heuristics which work should work, and advantages accrue. Yet we can still build machines which are better than any human, yet humans still have and execute ideas of ideal or perfect play even when using heuristics instead of a "purely rational" search. Now sure you're going to say that "well but we are going to solve Chess" and well, sure given enough computing power we can solve any game like chess. There isn't any reason we couldn't solve any game like league either; fundamentally its just a larger number. And there isn't any reason why heuristics don't produce "ideal or perfect play" just like they do in chess, or poker or X where X is any game.



On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?


I like it for support when there isn't anyone really good to exhaust or ignite. This is doubly true if I am playing a primarily peel support. If you're not the support though, barrier is better.

On March 08 2014 02:09 VayneAuthority wrote:
i think it just adds more viability to support so it isn't too bad. a hook or leona can still instawin the game at any point, so good to see that AP can be viable as support too, and they def need more gold to maintain the same power level as our favorite way too CC heavy friends bot


Plus the gold you get from objectives and picks which talismans active enables. Its hard to give up especially since a team that does not have talisman is oftentimes completely at the mercy of the team that does when it comes to making plays in the mid to lategame.

Talisman ensures that positioning errors are exploitable or defendable conversely. I am not sure how much gold that is worth but it has to be a lot.
Prog
Profile Joined December 2009
United Kingdom1470 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 17:28:42
March 07 2014 17:28 GMT
#1380
In season 3 i played heal on Janna, because if you don't want to do all-in fights in lane anyway you don't need ignite/exhaust very much. Heal is really strong in lategame teamfights, but you just sacrifice your early game laneing power. So if you have a way to make this disadvantage not matter at all, by stopping every all-in attempt, you are in a pretty good spot.


With the more lane-focused supports it's just too big of a loss in the early game, so I rarely play heal anymore.
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 133 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:00
Rotti's All Random #2
RotterdaM944
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 944
Hui .296
ProTech64
MindelVK 28
EmSc Tv 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 5355
Flash 3407
Sea 2861
Shuttle 2311
Horang2 1520
ggaemo 777
firebathero 731
Mini 674
Soulkey 457
hero 290
[ Show more ]
BeSt 275
Barracks 261
Soma 238
ZerO 231
Larva 219
Snow 189
Hyuk 125
Mong 108
Dewaltoss 103
sorry 100
TY 49
soO 34
Movie 24
scan(afreeca) 22
Terrorterran 20
sSak 12
Rock 12
IntoTheRainbow 10
JulyZerg 7
Dota 2
Gorgc7650
qojqva3538
XcaliburYe333
Counter-Strike
fl0m1581
zeus308
markeloff175
oskar152
Stewie2K112
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu148
Other Games
Beastyqt525
Lowko456
KnowMe428
Fuzer 172
ArmadaUGS102
Trikslyr69
QueenE64
kaitlyn40
FunKaTv 35
ZerO(Twitch)22
Organizations
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 27
EmSc2Tv 27
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta43
• LUISG 17
• Reevou 3
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2829
• WagamamaTV646
• Shiphtur249
League of Legends
• Nemesis3041
• Jankos1467
Other Games
• imaqtpie318
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 38m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
17h 38m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
21h 38m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 6h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 17h
Stormgate Nexus
1d 20h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 22h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
LiuLi Cup
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
RotterdaM Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.