• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:51
CET 19:51
KST 03:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League65Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
Do we even care about balance? [Recap] 0-6 Defeat for Mong's Team BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10270 users

[Patch 4.3] Vel'Koz General Discussion - Page 69

Forum Index > LoL General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 133 Next
EU LCS Week 8 Review
phyvo
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States5635 Posts
March 07 2014 15:31 GMT
#1361
On March 08 2014 00:22 739 wrote:
Team builder is for normal games or ranked as well ?


Team builder is an entirely separate queue that if I read correctly acts like BP normals when you get in. Since it's a separate queue though you will only be paired against other team builder teams.
"BE A MANGO TO SLEEP LIKE A SNORING TIGER" - Monte
Alaric
Profile Joined November 2009
France45622 Posts
March 07 2014 15:35 GMT
#1362
It's basically a secondary blind normals queue for now (it has its own MMR apparently, which isn't Elo but based on how much you've played the position (top, mid, bot, etc.) and the champion (they used the example of "if you've played a bunch of Annie support and then go play her mid it'll obviously treat it as different, though if you only play Ryze mid and Annie support the day you play Annie mid you'll be considered proficient")).
Cant take LMS hipsters serious.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
March 07 2014 15:39 GMT
#1363
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

Of course its poker. Last season c9 lost 3 games, and in two of those they guy first blooded pre 130 because of clever nonstandard wards.
Freeeeeeedom
Sponkz
Profile Joined May 2011
Denmark4564 Posts
March 07 2014 15:41 GMT
#1364
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.



Perfect play is near impossible. I like to think of it, as how you manage to execute the strategy of the 5 picks you decided to go for. At professional level it is determined by a mixture of coordination and setup. You have 3 phases of the game (early, mid, late-game). Judging the development of the scene, it's clear to see how much of an impact some teams can get by making "perfect plays" early-game with a late-game composition and thereby completely shutting down the enemy team's chances of winning, resulting in those ridiculous early-deny where one team will be 11 kills up with 4-5 towers, 2-3 drakes while the enemy team has like 1 tower, no drakes and 3-4 kills (and those kills are usually random shut downs, when the winning team overextend ).
hi
Dark_Chill
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada3353 Posts
March 07 2014 15:47 GMT
#1365
Just to be sure about this whole discussion, perfect play only involved very loose perfect decision making, right? Like only with what they know, not perfect assumptions they make to make the best possible play?
CUTE MAKES RIGHT
Zess
Profile Joined July 2012
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
March 07 2014 15:53 GMT
#1366
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

I take the even stronger approach that Goumindong objects to precisely for the reason that economists (and I say this having done research at the Chicago Booth School of Business) + Show Spoiler +
herpa derp lets drop credentials because that's how you prove your point in an argument right herpaderpa
are mostly garbage.

Sure, just as in poker, there are strong expected value plays, but that by no means is any standard of ideal or perfect play. My reference to stability is that League is a very nonlinear game, with slight perturbations in conditions having a much greater influence on the outcome of the game such that the notion of trying to define perfect play is very much meaningless. From the standpoint of a omniscient time-dilating observer, maybe it would be appropriate to ascertain the "perfect" or even "best" play in the situation (ignoring the fact that most omniscient time-dilating observers are awful at this game), but that's completely removed from being able to create those decision and execute them in game, where even given perfect execution and instantaneous rational decision making, the tail error in expectation assessment is going to run any semblance of "perfect play" out of the zoo.
Administrator@TL_Zess
| (• ◡•)|八 (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
Ketara
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States15065 Posts
March 07 2014 16:01 GMT
#1367
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?
http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/lol-general/502075-patch-61-league-of-legends-general-discussion?page=25#498
Kyrie
Profile Joined June 2013
1594 Posts
March 07 2014 16:16 GMT
#1368
i have a copy of freakonomics somewhere, and from my standpoint there are very clearly bad, probably okay, and very good plays. it's pretty much impossible to identify the 'perfect' play out of the available very good plays for the same reason that climate change models are notoriously difficult and i should mention that i've also seen the day after tomorrow at least three times
Alaric
Profile Joined November 2009
France45622 Posts
March 07 2014 16:18 GMT
#1369
Beaten by Barrier for individual purposes (lower cd, higher value, as long as you only use it in situations where the shield will be popped you're winning out), not worth replacing the duo laner's combat summoner spell (Exhaust/Ignite) in duo lanes.

Supposed to have higher pay-off against AoE teamcomps during teamfights, but look at Locket's and Soraka's popularity and... well... yeah.
Cant take LMS hipsters serious.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 16:19:27
March 07 2014 16:18 GMT
#1370
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.
Fusilero
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom50293 Posts
March 07 2014 17:03 GMT
#1371
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?
Glorious SEA doto
Jek
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark2771 Posts
March 07 2014 17:06 GMT
#1372
Holy cow. Frost Queen's Claim is stupid. 36m game, 1k+ gold more generated than Thresh's Talisman, I even got it super late. -.-

Next item on the nerf board?
It's Elo not ELO - Every statiscian playing League
VayneAuthority
Profile Joined October 2012
United States8983 Posts
March 07 2014 17:09 GMT
#1373
i think it just adds more viability to support so it isn't too bad. a hook or leona can still instawin the game at any point, so good to see that AP can be viable as support too, and they def need more gold to maintain the same power level as our favorite way too CC heavy friends bot
I come in for the scraps
Sponkz
Profile Joined May 2011
Denmark4564 Posts
March 07 2014 17:15 GMT
#1374
On March 08 2014 02:06 Jek wrote:
Holy cow. Frost Queen's Claim is stupid. 36m game, 1k+ gold more generated than Thresh's Talisman, I even got it super late. -.-

Next item on the nerf board?


Sona OP woohoo.
hi
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
March 07 2014 17:15 GMT
#1375
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
March 07 2014 17:16 GMT
#1376
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
March 07 2014 17:20 GMT
#1377
On March 08 2014 02:16 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh

Top Wukong going Brutaliser=>Vamp=>Avarice Blade=>Warden's Mail

Every game regardless of matchup.
Fusilero
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 17:24:28
March 07 2014 17:21 GMT
#1378
On March 08 2014 02:20 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:16 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh

Top Wukong going Brutaliser=>Vamp=>Avarice Blade=>Warden's Mail

Every game regardless of matchup.

The avarice blade is smart yo, he's fallen behind get the gold flowing to comeback. He is truly the next level theorycrafter god bless.
http://en.intelextrememasters.com/news/yet-more-stars-to-see-you-through-katowice/
Caster line up announced for IEM
Sjokz/Joe Miller/Deman/Krepo/Froggen/Deficio.....quikshot.
Glorious SEA doto
Goumindong
Profile Joined February 2013
United States3529 Posts
March 07 2014 17:26 GMT
#1379
On March 08 2014 00:53 xes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

I take the even stronger approach that Goumindong objects to precisely for the reason that economists (and I say this having done research at the Chicago Booth School of Business) + Show Spoiler +
herpa derp lets drop credentials because that's how you prove your point in an argument right herpaderpa
are mostly garbage.

Sure, just as in poker, there are strong expected value plays, but that by no means is any standard of ideal or perfect play. My reference to stability is that League is a very nonlinear game, with slight perturbations in conditions having a much greater influence on the outcome of the game such that the notion of trying to define perfect play is very much meaningless. From the standpoint of a omniscient time-dilating observer, maybe it would be appropriate to ascertain the "perfect" or even "best" play in the situation (ignoring the fact that most omniscient time-dilating observers are awful at this game), but that's completely removed from being able to create those decision and execute them in game, where even given perfect execution and instantaneous rational decision making, the tail error in expectation assessment is going to run any semblance of "perfect play" out of the zoo.


Bullshit. Just because a game is unsolved doesn't mean that there is no answer. And just because a game has systems which are not stationary does not mean that defining perfect play is meaningless. I cannot even begin to imagine why "stuff that happens early in the game has disproportionate impact" would mean "might as well throw your hands up you can't get better"

Chess for example is a game in which "there is no standard of ideal or perfect play" by your definition. The game isn't solved, there is no underlying reason why heuristics which work should work, and advantages accrue. Yet we can still build machines which are better than any human, yet humans still have and execute ideas of ideal or perfect play even when using heuristics instead of a "purely rational" search. Now sure you're going to say that "well but we are going to solve Chess" and well, sure given enough computing power we can solve any game like chess. There isn't any reason we couldn't solve any game like league either; fundamentally its just a larger number. And there isn't any reason why heuristics don't produce "ideal or perfect play" just like they do in chess, or poker or X where X is any game.



On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?


I like it for support when there isn't anyone really good to exhaust or ignite. This is doubly true if I am playing a primarily peel support. If you're not the support though, barrier is better.

On March 08 2014 02:09 VayneAuthority wrote:
i think it just adds more viability to support so it isn't too bad. a hook or leona can still instawin the game at any point, so good to see that AP can be viable as support too, and they def need more gold to maintain the same power level as our favorite way too CC heavy friends bot


Plus the gold you get from objectives and picks which talismans active enables. Its hard to give up especially since a team that does not have talisman is oftentimes completely at the mercy of the team that does when it comes to making plays in the mid to lategame.

Talisman ensures that positioning errors are exploitable or defendable conversely. I am not sure how much gold that is worth but it has to be a lot.
Prog
Profile Joined December 2009
United Kingdom1470 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 17:28:42
March 07 2014 17:28 GMT
#1380
In season 3 i played heal on Janna, because if you don't want to do all-in fights in lane anyway you don't need ignite/exhaust very much. Heal is really strong in lategame teamfights, but you just sacrifice your early game laneing power. So if you have a way to make this disadvantage not matter at all, by stopping every all-in attempt, you are in a pretty good spot.


With the more lane-focused supports it's just too big of a loss in the early game, so I rarely play heal anymore.
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 133 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
19:00
ScienceCraft - Day 2
IndyStarCraft 587
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Serral 2031
IndyStarCraft 587
BRAT_OK 83
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 11848
Shuttle 497
ProTech146
Dewaltoss 130
firebathero 118
Last 50
Hm[arnc] 30
Aegong 25
Dota 2
Gorgc13788
League of Legends
JimRising 603
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu395
Other Games
Grubby3440
Liquid`RaSZi2191
fl0m1683
singsing1610
FrodaN1427
B2W.Neo1079
Beastyqt897
olofmeister815
Mlord607
mouzStarbuck269
XaKoH 117
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1366
StarCraft 2
angryscii 25
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 24
• Reevou 14
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Airneanach47
• Azhi_Dahaki26
• ChaeLyn 8
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3328
• WagamamaTV25
League of Legends
• Jankos4737
• Nemesis3862
• Scarra1165
Other Games
• imaqtpie557
• Shiphtur435
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 9m
WardiTV Weekly
17h 9m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 16h
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
GSL
4 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
Yamato Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.