• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 11:39
CET 17:39
KST 01:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - RO16 Preview3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational12SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)24Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 [Short Story] The Last GSL
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Fantasy's Q&A video BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1729 users

[Patch 4.3] Vel'Koz General Discussion - Page 69

Forum Index > LoL General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 133 Next
EU LCS Week 8 Review
phyvo
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States5635 Posts
March 07 2014 15:31 GMT
#1361
On March 08 2014 00:22 739 wrote:
Team builder is for normal games or ranked as well ?


Team builder is an entirely separate queue that if I read correctly acts like BP normals when you get in. Since it's a separate queue though you will only be paired against other team builder teams.
"BE A MANGO TO SLEEP LIKE A SNORING TIGER" - Monte
Alaric
Profile Joined November 2009
France45622 Posts
March 07 2014 15:35 GMT
#1362
It's basically a secondary blind normals queue for now (it has its own MMR apparently, which isn't Elo but based on how much you've played the position (top, mid, bot, etc.) and the champion (they used the example of "if you've played a bunch of Annie support and then go play her mid it'll obviously treat it as different, though if you only play Ryze mid and Annie support the day you play Annie mid you'll be considered proficient")).
Cant take LMS hipsters serious.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
March 07 2014 15:39 GMT
#1363
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

Of course its poker. Last season c9 lost 3 games, and in two of those they guy first blooded pre 130 because of clever nonstandard wards.
Freeeeeeedom
Sponkz
Profile Joined May 2011
Denmark4564 Posts
March 07 2014 15:41 GMT
#1364
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.



Perfect play is near impossible. I like to think of it, as how you manage to execute the strategy of the 5 picks you decided to go for. At professional level it is determined by a mixture of coordination and setup. You have 3 phases of the game (early, mid, late-game). Judging the development of the scene, it's clear to see how much of an impact some teams can get by making "perfect plays" early-game with a late-game composition and thereby completely shutting down the enemy team's chances of winning, resulting in those ridiculous early-deny where one team will be 11 kills up with 4-5 towers, 2-3 drakes while the enemy team has like 1 tower, no drakes and 3-4 kills (and those kills are usually random shut downs, when the winning team overextend ).
hi
Dark_Chill
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada3353 Posts
March 07 2014 15:47 GMT
#1365
Just to be sure about this whole discussion, perfect play only involved very loose perfect decision making, right? Like only with what they know, not perfect assumptions they make to make the best possible play?
CUTE MAKES RIGHT
Zess
Profile Joined July 2012
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
March 07 2014 15:53 GMT
#1366
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Show nested quote +
Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

I take the even stronger approach that Goumindong objects to precisely for the reason that economists (and I say this having done research at the Chicago Booth School of Business) + Show Spoiler +
herpa derp lets drop credentials because that's how you prove your point in an argument right herpaderpa
are mostly garbage.

Sure, just as in poker, there are strong expected value plays, but that by no means is any standard of ideal or perfect play. My reference to stability is that League is a very nonlinear game, with slight perturbations in conditions having a much greater influence on the outcome of the game such that the notion of trying to define perfect play is very much meaningless. From the standpoint of a omniscient time-dilating observer, maybe it would be appropriate to ascertain the "perfect" or even "best" play in the situation (ignoring the fact that most omniscient time-dilating observers are awful at this game), but that's completely removed from being able to create those decision and execute them in game, where even given perfect execution and instantaneous rational decision making, the tail error in expectation assessment is going to run any semblance of "perfect play" out of the zoo.
Administrator@TL_Zess
| (• ◡•)|八 (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
Ketara
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States15065 Posts
March 07 2014 16:01 GMT
#1367
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?
http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/lol-general/502075-patch-61-league-of-legends-general-discussion?page=25#498
Kyrie
Profile Joined June 2013
1594 Posts
March 07 2014 16:16 GMT
#1368
i have a copy of freakonomics somewhere, and from my standpoint there are very clearly bad, probably okay, and very good plays. it's pretty much impossible to identify the 'perfect' play out of the available very good plays for the same reason that climate change models are notoriously difficult and i should mention that i've also seen the day after tomorrow at least three times
Alaric
Profile Joined November 2009
France45622 Posts
March 07 2014 16:18 GMT
#1369
Beaten by Barrier for individual purposes (lower cd, higher value, as long as you only use it in situations where the shield will be popped you're winning out), not worth replacing the duo laner's combat summoner spell (Exhaust/Ignite) in duo lanes.

Supposed to have higher pay-off against AoE teamcomps during teamfights, but look at Locket's and Soraka's popularity and... well... yeah.
Cant take LMS hipsters serious.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35166 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 16:19:27
March 07 2014 16:18 GMT
#1370
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.
Fusilero
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom50293 Posts
March 07 2014 17:03 GMT
#1371
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?
Glorious SEA doto
Jek
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark2771 Posts
March 07 2014 17:06 GMT
#1372
Holy cow. Frost Queen's Claim is stupid. 36m game, 1k+ gold more generated than Thresh's Talisman, I even got it super late. -.-

Next item on the nerf board?
It's Elo not ELO - Every statiscian playing League
VayneAuthority
Profile Joined October 2012
United States8983 Posts
March 07 2014 17:09 GMT
#1373
i think it just adds more viability to support so it isn't too bad. a hook or leona can still instawin the game at any point, so good to see that AP can be viable as support too, and they def need more gold to maintain the same power level as our favorite way too CC heavy friends bot
I come in for the scraps
Sponkz
Profile Joined May 2011
Denmark4564 Posts
March 07 2014 17:15 GMT
#1374
On March 08 2014 02:06 Jek wrote:
Holy cow. Frost Queen's Claim is stupid. 36m game, 1k+ gold more generated than Thresh's Talisman, I even got it super late. -.-

Next item on the nerf board?


Sona OP woohoo.
hi
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35166 Posts
March 07 2014 17:15 GMT
#1375
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
March 07 2014 17:16 GMT
#1376
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35166 Posts
March 07 2014 17:20 GMT
#1377
On March 08 2014 02:16 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh

Top Wukong going Brutaliser=>Vamp=>Avarice Blade=>Warden's Mail

Every game regardless of matchup.
Fusilero
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 17:24:28
March 07 2014 17:21 GMT
#1378
On March 08 2014 02:20 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 02:16 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:15 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 02:03 Fusilero wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:18 Gahlo wrote:
On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?

A friend of mine insists on taking it into top lane for heal baits. This is in spite of me telling him that barrier does it better.

He also feeds like a motherfucker if he falls behind and follows the same assanine build every game.

Is your friend silsol?

I wish.


ehhhhhhhhhhhh

Top Wukong going Brutaliser=>Vamp=>Avarice Blade=>Warden's Mail

Every game regardless of matchup.

The avarice blade is smart yo, he's fallen behind get the gold flowing to comeback. He is truly the next level theorycrafter god bless.
http://en.intelextrememasters.com/news/yet-more-stars-to-see-you-through-katowice/
Caster line up announced for IEM
Sjokz/Joe Miller/Deman/Krepo/Froggen/Deficio.....quikshot.
Glorious SEA doto
Goumindong
Profile Joined February 2013
United States3529 Posts
March 07 2014 17:26 GMT
#1379
On March 08 2014 00:53 xes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2014 23:29 TheYango wrote:
On March 07 2014 17:48 Goumindong wrote:
I am not sure what asymmetric information has to do with the existence of "perfect play". Furthermore I am not sure why there must be a certain outcome in order for play to be perfect. On top of this i don't know what "stability" means with regards to a game*. And to top it all I am not sure why gold would have to be a stationary process in order for perfect play to exist.

I think the point is that Monte's basically trying to say that if both sides played perfectly, a single set of starting conditions for a game would produce a deterministic outcome. Which I think is absolutely ludicrous, and I think that's the point xes is trying to make as well.

It's not that perfect play can't exist, it's that Monte's ideas about what perfect play is are incredibly off the mark.

Look just you can play the same teams with the same comps and get different outcomes doesn't mean that perfect play doesn't exist. It just means that perfect play doesn't always win. Basically, think about League like poker. While poker has sequential turns and league has continuous simultaneous "turns" both league and poker are games of asymmetric information (you know your cards you don't know theirs ) which have stochasticity (cards dealt) and have non-stationary properties which leads to the overall win condition(winning a hand means you have more money with which to bet on the next hand, if winning a hand doesn't change how you bet, winnings are still strictly non-stationary). None of this means that perfect play in poker doesn't exist, it just means that perfect play in poker doesn't always win**.

The Poker example is pretty apt, because Monte's assertion that perfect play results in an 11 tower 0 kill game is like saying perfect play in Poker means always folding statistically weak hands and that no hand in hold 'em should progress past the flop. Which is obviously ridiculous.

I take the even stronger approach that Goumindong objects to precisely for the reason that economists (and I say this having done research at the Chicago Booth School of Business) + Show Spoiler +
herpa derp lets drop credentials because that's how you prove your point in an argument right herpaderpa
are mostly garbage.

Sure, just as in poker, there are strong expected value plays, but that by no means is any standard of ideal or perfect play. My reference to stability is that League is a very nonlinear game, with slight perturbations in conditions having a much greater influence on the outcome of the game such that the notion of trying to define perfect play is very much meaningless. From the standpoint of a omniscient time-dilating observer, maybe it would be appropriate to ascertain the "perfect" or even "best" play in the situation (ignoring the fact that most omniscient time-dilating observers are awful at this game), but that's completely removed from being able to create those decision and execute them in game, where even given perfect execution and instantaneous rational decision making, the tail error in expectation assessment is going to run any semblance of "perfect play" out of the zoo.


Bullshit. Just because a game is unsolved doesn't mean that there is no answer. And just because a game has systems which are not stationary does not mean that defining perfect play is meaningless. I cannot even begin to imagine why "stuff that happens early in the game has disproportionate impact" would mean "might as well throw your hands up you can't get better"

Chess for example is a game in which "there is no standard of ideal or perfect play" by your definition. The game isn't solved, there is no underlying reason why heuristics which work should work, and advantages accrue. Yet we can still build machines which are better than any human, yet humans still have and execute ideas of ideal or perfect play even when using heuristics instead of a "purely rational" search. Now sure you're going to say that "well but we are going to solve Chess" and well, sure given enough computing power we can solve any game like chess. There isn't any reason we couldn't solve any game like league either; fundamentally its just a larger number. And there isn't any reason why heuristics don't produce "ideal or perfect play" just like they do in chess, or poker or X where X is any game.



On March 08 2014 01:01 Ketara wrote:
What are peoples opinions on the Heal summoner these days, I am wondering?


I like it for support when there isn't anyone really good to exhaust or ignite. This is doubly true if I am playing a primarily peel support. If you're not the support though, barrier is better.

On March 08 2014 02:09 VayneAuthority wrote:
i think it just adds more viability to support so it isn't too bad. a hook or leona can still instawin the game at any point, so good to see that AP can be viable as support too, and they def need more gold to maintain the same power level as our favorite way too CC heavy friends bot


Plus the gold you get from objectives and picks which talismans active enables. Its hard to give up especially since a team that does not have talisman is oftentimes completely at the mercy of the team that does when it comes to making plays in the mid to lategame.

Talisman ensures that positioning errors are exploitable or defendable conversely. I am not sure how much gold that is worth but it has to be a lot.
Prog
Profile Joined December 2009
United Kingdom1470 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-07 17:28:42
March 07 2014 17:28 GMT
#1380
In season 3 i played heal on Janna, because if you don't want to do all-in fights in lane anyway you don't need ignite/exhaust very much. Heal is really strong in lategame teamfights, but you just sacrifice your early game laneing power. So if you have a way to make this disadvantage not matter at all, by stopping every all-in attempt, you are in a pretty good spot.


With the more lane-focused supports it's just too big of a loss in the early game, so I rarely play heal anymore.
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 133 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
15:00
NKorea Champ Playoff Final Day
Mihu vs XuanXuan
Bonyth vs Dewalt
ZZZero.O295
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech157
Rex 146
SteadfastSC 129
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 3185
Sea 2676
Shuttle 560
EffOrt 508
Mini 453
Larva 297
ZZZero.O 295
Hyuk 245
actioN 240
GuemChi 220
[ Show more ]
firebathero 193
ggaemo 161
hero 128
Soulkey 111
Rush 105
Hyun 82
Mong 59
Sharp 58
Mind 53
Free 31
Hm[arnc] 29
Yoon 28
Shinee 24
Rock 23
soO 21
HiyA 18
Shine 17
Noble 10
JulyZerg 8
Terrorterran 8
Dota 2
Gorgc5745
qojqva2531
singsing2442
420jenkins1030
syndereN495
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m3402
SPUNJ147
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King60
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor571
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi1730
B2W.Neo1433
DeMusliM300
FrodaN291
XaKoH 95
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1906
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 197
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2954
• TFBlade1076
Other Games
• tFFMrPink 8
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 21m
Wardi Open
21h 21m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d
OSC
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
HomeStory Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
HomeStory Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
HomeStory Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-24
OSC Championship Season 13
Tektek Cup #1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.