EPTThe lithe rage I feel...
[Patch 3.07: Nerf Everything Not Nami] General Discussion…
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Looks like we're back to status quo. Hope more of you lurkers unburrow and talk with us. :3 If you have any issues or comments about the new design, feel free to PM Neo. | ||
|
ninjakingcola
United States405 Posts
The lithe rage I feel... | ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On May 28 2013 06:56 JBright wrote: ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/images/usericons/Z7.gif) ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/images/usericons/Z3.gif) You have to admit they look really similar. i think i beat both of them :o | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On May 28 2013 10:18 wei2coolman wrote: "good scrims guys"- st.v to EU after 2-0ing them. fucking hilarious. Lol that is awesome. When did it happen? Any links? | ||
|
RagequitBM
Canada2270 Posts
| ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On May 28 2013 10:32 KissBlade wrote: Lol that is awesome. When did it happen? Any links? Dyrus just said that's what ST.V said to the EU team when they were shaking hands. | ||
|
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
On May 28 2013 10:42 wei2coolman wrote: Dyrus just said that's what ST.V said to the EU team when they were shaking hands. ![[image loading]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/1347314156_kelso-burn.jpg) | ||
|
schmutttt
Australia3856 Posts
edit - is that a goliath i cant tell | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On May 28 2013 10:55 schmutttt wrote: OK which icon did I get edit - is that a goliath i cant tell Yes, you aren't blind, like our resident banling. | ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
I haven't really played the game much since Syndra patch, so maybe I am missing something very obvious. The two negatron items that come to mind - spirit visage and BV - both seem like I am paying for an additional effect that is not very useful (vamp / a shield that will be popped by a trivial spell in pre-teamfight situations). Hexdrinker seems like a rather silly buy after completing 2-3 items, as I'm not really itemizing damage, and the MR offered is rather low compared to negatron based items. I could just keep the negatron and not turn it into anything...but seeing as I don't generally get to shop with huge amounts of gold, the slot-efficiency might make me sad. Is bulwark still cost effective if the support is already getting it? When I last really played Aegis was an insanely good buy in pretty much any tankiness-requiring situation, has the cost-efficiency changed since then? Maybe I should just stack health? Seems like there's a good amount of %-based damage out there though. Any input would be appreciated. | ||
|
kongoline
6318 Posts
On May 28 2013 10:42 wei2coolman wrote: Dyrus just said that's what ST.V said to the EU team when they were shaking hands. inb4 fnatic and GG dumps on crs/tsm on lcs worlds once again | ||
|
dae
Canada1600 Posts
On May 28 2013 11:03 419 wrote: hopefully someone can answer this for me - what is a good MR jungler item for mid-late game vs a 2+ AP comp? The champion that I ran into this issue was on J4, but I think the question can be generalized. I haven't really played the game much since Syndra patch, so maybe I am missing something very obvious. The two negatron items that come to mind - spirit visage and BV - both seem like I am paying for an additional effect that is not very useful (vamp / a shield that will be popped by a trivial spell in pre-teamfight situations). Hexdrinker seems like a rather silly buy after completing 2-3 items, as I'm not really itemizing damage, and the MR offered is rather low compared to negatron based items. I could just keep the negatron and not turn it into anything...but seeing as I don't generally get to shop with huge amounts of gold, the slot-efficiency might make me sad. Is bulwark still cost effective if the support is already getting it? When I last really played Aegis was an insanely good buy in pretty much any tankiness-requiring situation, has the cost-efficiency changed since then? Maybe I should just stack health? Seems like there's a good amount of %-based damage out there though. Any input would be appreciated. In my opinion, getting a bulwark and a hexdrinker is usually good enough vs ap, Hexdrinker is really strong during laning if you get it early enough. Bulwark is 100% always buy on jungler right now vs double ap comps, and almost 100% buy vs single ap comp. | ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
On May 28 2013 11:03 419 wrote: Is bulwark still cost effective if the support is already getting it? When I last really played Aegis was an insanely good buy in pretty much any tankiness-requiring situation, has the cost-efficiency changed since then? You should get Bulwark every game unless you want to be super selfish of they have literally 0 AP damage. Even vs stuff like Sona ult the extra MR from bulwark is awesome. | ||
|
Ethelis
United States2396 Posts
| ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
Ah, I like Aegis/Bulwark still but it's been awhile for me so I could be incorrect in that assumption. Spirit Visage is not appreciated enough. I mean what kind of champions are we talking about here I guess? | ||
|
ShloobeR
Korea (South)3811 Posts
On May 28 2013 11:03 419 wrote: hopefully someone can answer this for me - what is a good MR jungler item for mid-late game vs a 2+ AP comp? The champion that I ran into this issue was on J4, but I think the question can be generalized. I haven't really played the game much since Syndra patch, so maybe I am missing something very obvious. The two negatron items that come to mind - spirit visage and BV - both seem like I am paying for an additional effect that is not very useful (vamp / a shield that will be popped by a trivial spell in pre-teamfight situations). Hexdrinker seems like a rather silly buy after completing 2-3 items, as I'm not really itemizing damage, and the MR offered is rather low compared to negatron based items. I could just keep the negatron and not turn it into anything...but seeing as I don't generally get to shop with huge amounts of gold, the slot-efficiency might make me sad. Is bulwark still cost effective if the support is already getting it? When I last really played Aegis was an insanely good buy in pretty much any tankiness-requiring situation, has the cost-efficiency changed since then? Maybe I should just stack health? Seems like there's a good amount of %-based damage out there though. Any input would be appreciated. In that situation I usually tell my support that I'm getting bulwark and they should build something else first Since the jungler is the one who will be in the APs face a lot more there's no reason to concede it to the support. | ||
|
Spaiku
Spain1114 Posts
On May 28 2013 10:41 RagequitBM wrote: I remember Dlift said that the EU team beat NA in one scrim, then refused to scrim them again because they were too weak. Looks like the turn tables have turned. EU scrimmed NA one game, beat them and then they said they were going to scrim SEA instead of playing more games with them. I'm not trying to defend EU but it was very likely for them to play NA in the real tounament matches and almost imposible to have to play SEA so they probably didn't want to reveal anything more to the american team. | ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
Playstation and PS2 each had full better libraries that N64 and GC respectively. Aside from Zelda games and SSB games, I had no interest in Nintendo consoles. Wii was dubious at best, and is my least favorite out of this gen. The only non Zelda/Mario/SSB titles I really enjoyed from it were No More Heroes and Mad World. Everything else was gimmicky. I plan to get a PS4 but have no intention on buying a Wii U unless some title for it really wows me. | ||
|
overt
United States9006 Posts
On May 28 2013 11:10 Spaiku wrote: EU scrimmed NA one game, beat them and then they said they were going to scrim SEA instead of playing more games with them. I'm not trying to defend EU but it was very likely for them to play NA in the real tounament matches and almost imposible to have to play SEA so they probably wanted to not reveal anything more to the american team. They made the NA team wait for three hours for a scrim and then stomped them and only scrimmed them once. It was a shit move by EU no matter how you try to look at it/justify it. Like, I could understand them not wanting to scrim NA because of the high chance that they'd face each other but in that case they shouldn't have agreed to scirm NA in the first place instead of wasting 3-4 hours of their time. | ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
| ||
| ||
