On October 14 2012 08:44 Dusty wrote: Speaking of top lane, I used to play Rumble top a lot but stopped because of the popularity of Jayce/Rengar/Irelia. Who else is on my boat? Miss my Rumble
I like Rumble but his laning phase is beyond my comprehension. With no natural sustain, weak mobility, and only a single non-ultimate ranged spell, he eithers wins his lane really hard or lose really hard.
On October 14 2012 08:44 Dusty wrote: Speaking of top lane, I used to play Rumble top a lot but stopped because of the popularity of Jayce/Rengar/Irelia. Who else is on my boat? Miss my Rumble
I like Rumble but his laning phase is beyond my comprehension. With no natural sustain, weak mobility, and only a single non-ultimate ranged spell, he eithers wins his lane really hard or lose really hard.
Rumble is about living to level 5/6 and killing them in one combo because everyone underestimates the yordlescum.
On October 14 2012 08:44 Dusty wrote: Speaking of top lane, I used to play Rumble top a lot but stopped because of the popularity of Jayce/Rengar/Irelia. Who else is on my boat? Miss my Rumble
I like Rumble but his laning phase is beyond my comprehension. With no natural sustain, weak mobility, and only a single non-ultimate ranged spell, he eithers wins his lane really hard or lose really hard.
Rumble is about living to level 5/6 and killing them in one combo because everyone underestimates the yordlescum.
Lose lane, kill everything anyway because ult does 2x what it should and is a 99% slow.
On October 14 2012 08:44 Dusty wrote: Speaking of top lane, I used to play Rumble top a lot but stopped because of the popularity of Jayce/Rengar/Irelia. Who else is on my boat? Miss my Rumble
I like Rumble but his laning phase is beyond my comprehension. With no natural sustain, weak mobility, and only a single non-ultimate ranged spell, he eithers wins his lane really hard or lose really hard.
Rumble is about living to level 5/6 and killing them in one combo because everyone underestimates the yordlescum.
Lose lane, kill everything anyway because ult does 2x what it should and is a 99% slow.
Ask Gandhi.
Oh, are we complaining about Rumble now?
Regular ability that does ult damage as long as you can stay in melee range is balanced, k?
On October 14 2012 08:17 Frolossus wrote: how is the new double gold card thing on TF different from the one way back in beta? if you time it right then you can just chain gold cards all day
Old one was stand still, pick gold card (while not moving), you get another one; you didn't cast the spell twice.
On October 14 2012 08:44 Dusty wrote: Speaking of top lane, I used to play Rumble top a lot but stopped because of the popularity of Jayce/Rengar/Irelia. Who else is on my boat? Miss my Rumble
On October 14 2012 08:44 Dusty wrote: Speaking of top lane, I used to play Rumble top a lot but stopped because of the popularity of Jayce/Rengar/Irelia. Who else is on my boat? Miss my Rumble
There's no problem. Just learn the heroes and figure out what champs you can play against them. Top lane used to be a sustain fest so people aren't used to the more cutthroat top lane.
Looking at the Rumble numbers a bit, why is it that no one maxes E first? It looks to me that his E does about the same damage as his Q anyway (disregarding the AP ratio a bit).
On October 14 2012 11:13 Sufficiency wrote: Looking at the Rumble numbers a bit, why is it that no one maxes E first? It looks to me that his E does about the same damage as his Q anyway (disregarding the AP ratio a bit).
On October 14 2012 11:13 Sufficiency wrote: Looking at the Rumble numbers a bit, why is it that no one maxes E first? It looks to me that his E does about the same damage as his Q anyway (disregarding the AP ratio a bit).
I might give this a try.
E has a longer cd, Q does the same damage at rank 3 and more damage at every rank thereafter.
On October 14 2012 11:13 Sufficiency wrote: Looking at the Rumble numbers a bit, why is it that no one maxes E first? It looks to me that his E does about the same damage as his Q anyway (disregarding the AP ratio a bit).
I might give this a try.
....Maybe because it's on twice the cooldown?
CD is not the most important thing when it comes to trading though.
On October 14 2012 11:13 Sufficiency wrote: Looking at the Rumble numbers a bit, why is it that no one maxes E first? It looks to me that his E does about the same damage as his Q anyway (disregarding the AP ratio a bit).
I might give this a try.
....Maybe because it's on twice the cooldown?
CD is not the most important thing when it comes to trading though.
EPT
