• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 14:56
CET 20:56
KST 04:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)25Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued [Short Story] The Last GSL
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained
Brood War
General
Which foreign pros are considered the best? [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Fantasy's Q&A video
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Lost love spell caster in Spain +27 74 116 2667
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1361 users

Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 498

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 496 497 498 499 500 913 Next
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
July 19 2023 16:21 GMT
#9941
Bombing food infrastructure in Odesa and now a naval blockade. Russia was, and is, fighting a war of destruction. No way to blame 'Nato expansion' for this. Just pure malice. It's disgusting.

Neosteel Enthusiast
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11729 Posts
July 19 2023 16:32 GMT
#9942
I hope Turkey calls their bluff. I am really no Erdogan fan, but in this case the ego of an autocrat will not allow him to let Russia dictate what happens in "his" sea.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
July 19 2023 16:47 GMT
#9943
--- Nuked ---
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11729 Posts
July 19 2023 16:50 GMT
#9944
I have no idea if the turkish navy is good, but at least they haven't lost their flagship to a nation without a navy.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22069 Posts
July 19 2023 16:50 GMT
#9945
Its not for nothing that Russia has been attacking Odessa to stop them from being able to export grain. If it gets on boats under NATO protection there is little they can do without significant risk. So they are trying to stop it before it gets on a boat.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Zaros
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United Kingdom3692 Posts
July 19 2023 17:07 GMT
#9946
Don’t really understand the logic of these attacks, it’s not going to impact Ukraine in military terms that all this grain is destroyed. If it’s sitting in Odessa silos then it was bound for export.

This is just going to piss off the rest of the world particularly Africa which depends on the grain. What does Russia actually gain by doing this other than destruction for destruction sake.

Maybe pushes food prices up further and encourages western support to erode, but that seems incredibly desperate.
pmp10
Profile Joined April 2012
3380 Posts
July 19 2023 17:14 GMT
#9947
It pushes up food prices in Middle East and Africa potentially causing more migration into southern Europe
That's an obvious weak point for EU, it could cause political fractures or in the very least become a serious resource drain.
CuddlyCuteKitten
Profile Joined January 2004
Sweden2708 Posts
July 19 2023 17:45 GMT
#9948
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.


Best play could be for the rest of the world to say "Fine. You called it, now enforce it".

There are really not any rules when it comes to international politics but "paper blockades" have been considered illegal for a long time. That's when you declare a blockade but lack the power for full enforcement. Basically in order for neutral parties to consider the blockade legal you are supposed to be able to block ALL ships.

So the rest of the world could lean back and let a couple of grain ship pass through the Bosporus, hang a tight left into Romanian and Bulgarian national waters and enter Ukrainian (or international waters) within eyesight of the Ukrainian coastline. I'd hate to be the Russian captain who is supposed to stop and search a ship in that location...

Of course they could just send a radio message ordering all merchant ships in the black sea to divert to Sevastopol and start lobbing long range anti ship missiles if they don't obey. But that's not very traditional and it feels like a good way to get the entire black sea turned into a no go zone for your ships and aircraft or get into a real war with someone.
waaaaaaaaaaaooooow - Felicia, SPF2:T
Ardias
Profile Joined January 2014
Russian Federation617 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-19 18:48:37
July 19 2023 18:17 GMT
#9949
On July 20 2023 02:45 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.


Best play could be for the rest of the world to say "Fine. You called it, now enforce it".

There are really not any rules when it comes to international politics but "paper blockades" have been considered illegal for a long time. That's when you declare a blockade but lack the power for full enforcement. Basically in order for neutral parties to consider the blockade legal you are supposed to be able to block ALL ships.

So the rest of the world could lean back and let a couple of grain ship pass through the Bosporus, hang a tight left into Romanian and Bulgarian national waters and enter Ukrainian (or international waters) within eyesight of the Ukrainian coastline. I'd hate to be the Russian captain who is supposed to stop and search a ship in that location...

Of course they could just send a radio message ordering all merchant ships in the black sea to divert to Sevastopol and start lobbing long range anti ship missiles if they don't obey. But that's not very traditional and it feels like a good way to get the entire black sea turned into a no go zone for your ships and aircraft or get into a real war with someone.

He doesn't need to. Per RU MoD press release:
"Any ships moving through Black Sea into Ukrainian ports are considered potential transporters of military cargo".
However I agree that it's yet to be seen if it would be enforced in practice. As well as if anyone tries to go through anyway. Hugging territorial waters is an option indeed. Still, it would most likely deter many private contractors from attempting to move in.
On July 20 2023 02:07 Zaros wrote:
Don’t really understand the logic of these attacks, it’s not going to impact Ukraine in military terms that all this grain is destroyed. If it’s sitting in Odessa silos then it was bound for export.

This is just going to piss off the rest of the world particularly Africa which depends on the grain. What does Russia actually gain by doing this other than destruction for destruction sake.

Maybe pushes food prices up further and encourages western support to erode, but that seems incredibly desperate.

Main Russian public concern was that ships inbound to Odessa were bringing military supplies. Real (or main) reason - most likely to cut Ukraine from profits of grain trade, to decrease their capability to fund the war. Especially considering that Ukraine's European neighbours are still banning Ukraine's grain import as well.
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.

Widely unpopular where? Within Russia pro-westerners do not care, and patriots of different kinds are applauding it in unison.
If it's about Africa, then Russia made a lot of steps to assure that African nations will be promptly supplied by grain and fertilizers in any case.
https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21608.doc.htm
https://tass.com/politics/1625355
https://nation.africa/kenya/news/inside-russia-s-fertiliser-diplomacy-and-kenya-s-place-in-it--4257646
https://www.drycargomag.com/if-ukraine-grain-port-deal-expires-russia-to-supply-africa
https://www.africanews.com/2023/03/20/grain-deal-russia-ready-to-send-food-for-free-to-african-countries-in-need//
There certainly would be some fallout, but I'm not sure if it would be too big (if the blockade holds of course).

If it's about West, I doubt anyone in Kremlin (or even in Russia in general) cares too much at this point.
Mess with the best or die like the rest.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11729 Posts
July 19 2023 18:20 GMT
#9950
Ukraine has a gigantic border to the west. With multiple rail lines and road. It is not that hard to get weapons into Ukraine.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
July 19 2023 18:22 GMT
#9951
--- Nuked ---
CuddlyCuteKitten
Profile Joined January 2004
Sweden2708 Posts
July 19 2023 18:34 GMT
#9952
On July 20 2023 03:17 Ardias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2023 02:45 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote:
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.


Best play could be for the rest of the world to say "Fine. You called it, now enforce it".

There are really not any rules when it comes to international politics but "paper blockades" have been considered illegal for a long time. That's when you declare a blockade but lack the power for full enforcement. Basically in order for neutral parties to consider the blockade legal you are supposed to be able to block ALL ships.

So the rest of the world could lean back and let a couple of grain ship pass through the Bosporus, hang a tight left into Romanian and Bulgarian national waters and enter Ukrainian (or international waters) within eyesight of the Ukrainian coastline. I'd hate to be the Russian captain who is supposed to stop and search a ship in that location...

Of course they could just send a radio message ordering all merchant ships in the black sea to divert to Sevastopol and start lobbing long range anti ship missiles if they don't obey. But that's not very traditional and it feels like a good way to get the entire black sea turned into a no go zone for your ships and aircraft or get into a real war with someone.

He doesn't need to. Per RU MoD press release:
"Any ships moving through Black Sea into Ukrainian ports are considered potential transporters of military cargo".
However I agree that it's yet to be seen if it would be enforced in practice. As well as if anyone tries to go through anyway. Hugging territorial waters is an option indeed. Still, it would most likely deter many private contractors from attempting to move in.
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2023 02:07 Zaros wrote:
Don’t really understand the logic of these attacks, it’s not going to impact Ukraine in military terms that all this grain is destroyed. If it’s sitting in Odessa silos then it was bound for export.

This is just going to piss off the rest of the world particularly Africa which depends on the grain. What does Russia actually gain by doing this other than destruction for destruction sake.

Maybe pushes food prices up further and encourages western support to erode, but that seems incredibly desperate.

Main Russian public concern was that ships inbound to Odessa were bringing military suppliers. Real (or main) reason - most likely to cut Ukraine from profits of grain trade, to decrease their capability to fund the war. Especially considering that Ukraine's European neighbours are still banning Ukraine's grain import as well.
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.

Widely unpopular where? Within Russia pro-westerners do not care, and patriots of different kinds are applauding it in unison.
If it's about Africa, then Russia made a lot of steps to assure that African nations will be promptly supplied by grain and fertilizers in any case.
https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21608.doc.htm
https://tass.com/politics/1625355
https://nation.africa/kenya/news/inside-russia-s-fertiliser-diplomacy-and-kenya-s-place-in-it--4257646
https://www.drycargomag.com/if-ukraine-grain-port-deal-expires-russia-to-supply-africa
https://www.africanews.com/2023/03/20/grain-deal-russia-ready-to-send-food-for-free-to-african-countries-in-need//
There certainly would be some fallout, but I'm not sure if it would be too big (if the blockade holds of course).

If it's about West, I doubt anyone in Kremlin (or even in Russia in general) cares too much at this point.


Of course they don't NEED to do it by the book. However blockades are a recognised form of warfare that neutral parties are supposed to respect. If you follow the customary legal guidelines for a blockade it's hard for anyone to argue that they should intervene.
If you don't (especially if you can't) it's another ballgame.
Germany blockaded the UK with submarines in WWI just sinking stuff. That's what got America involved in that war...

There are also a lot of big actors interested in blockades, especially China (for multiple reasons). It's a sensitive subject and I would not be surprised if it could backfire diplomatically big time.
waaaaaaaaaaaooooow - Felicia, SPF2:T
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6261 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-19 19:28:16
July 19 2023 19:26 GMT
#9953
On July 20 2023 03:22 JimmiC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2023 03:17 Ardias wrote:
On July 20 2023 02:45 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote:
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.


Best play could be for the rest of the world to say "Fine. You called it, now enforce it".

There are really not any rules when it comes to international politics but "paper blockades" have been considered illegal for a long time. That's when you declare a blockade but lack the power for full enforcement. Basically in order for neutral parties to consider the blockade legal you are supposed to be able to block ALL ships.

So the rest of the world could lean back and let a couple of grain ship pass through the Bosporus, hang a tight left into Romanian and Bulgarian national waters and enter Ukrainian (or international waters) within eyesight of the Ukrainian coastline. I'd hate to be the Russian captain who is supposed to stop and search a ship in that location...

Of course they could just send a radio message ordering all merchant ships in the black sea to divert to Sevastopol and start lobbing long range anti ship missiles if they don't obey. But that's not very traditional and it feels like a good way to get the entire black sea turned into a no go zone for your ships and aircraft or get into a real war with someone.

He doesn't need to. Per RU MoD press release:
"Any ships moving through Black Sea into Ukrainian ports are considered potential transporters of military cargo".
However I agree that it's yet to be seen if it would be enforced in practice. As well as if anyone tries to go through anyway. Hugging territorial waters is an option indeed. Still, it would most likely deter many private contractors from attempting to move in.
On July 20 2023 02:07 Zaros wrote:
Don’t really understand the logic of these attacks, it’s not going to impact Ukraine in military terms that all this grain is destroyed. If it’s sitting in Odessa silos then it was bound for export.

This is just going to piss off the rest of the world particularly Africa which depends on the grain. What does Russia actually gain by doing this other than destruction for destruction sake.

Maybe pushes food prices up further and encourages western support to erode, but that seems incredibly desperate.

Main Russian public concern was that ships inbound to Odessa were bringing military suppliers. Real (or main) reason - most likely to cut Ukraine from profits of grain trade, to decrease their capability to fund the war. Especially considering that Ukraine's European neighbours are still banning Ukraine's grain import as well.
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.

Widely unpopular where? Within Russia pro-westerners do not care, and patriots of different kinds are applauding it in unison.
If it's about Africa, then Russia made a lot of steps to assure that African nations will be promptly supplied by grain and fertilizers in any case.
https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21608.doc.htm
https://tass.com/politics/1625355
https://nation.africa/kenya/news/inside-russia-s-fertiliser-diplomacy-and-kenya-s-place-in-it--4257646
https://www.drycargomag.com/if-ukraine-grain-port-deal-expires-russia-to-supply-africa
https://www.africanews.com/2023/03/20/grain-deal-russia-ready-to-send-food-for-free-to-african-countries-in-need//
There certainly would be some fallout, but I'm not sure if it would be too big (if the blockade holds of course).

If it's about West, I doubt anyone in Kremlin (or even in Russia in general) cares too much at this point.


The whole talk of the fear of this deal collapsing was the good security in the south. If Russia is able to supply them all and keep the prices down then you are right it won’t be unpopular. I’m skeptical they will be able too, time will tell if as you say they are successful in the blockade.

I suspect it is bluster at this point and being used as a distraction and excuse to hit non military targets, time will tell.

You cannot keep prices down without rationing if you decrease supply. Certainly not with a commodity like grain. The costs will just be born by other market participants which, considering the nature of the market, means every other country in the world.
Excludos
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway8231 Posts
July 19 2023 20:00 GMT
#9954
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/07/19/7412033/

So a week after their last scare, they go again. China also apparently just released a statement about the war, including a paragraph on nuclear threats and accidents, basically just saying; don't.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43522 Posts
July 19 2023 20:14 GMT
#9955
There’s already an effective blockade on the Black Sea for military hardware because the straits are closed for military use. All the hardware is coming from Poland. This literally only impacts grain exports.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
July 19 2023 20:43 GMT
#9956
--- Nuked ---
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-20 01:31:34
July 19 2023 20:47 GMT
#9957
In what world does this make sense... oddly enough this is how the US entered the first world war. Also what happens when say an Egyptian cargo ship that needs Grain is boarded by armed Russian sailors, or worse finds itself sinking on account of a Russian sub.... does Putin think Turkey will sit idly by?

Russia will consider all vessels traveling on the Black Sea heading to Ukrainian ports as “potential military cargo carriers” starting from Thursday, the Russian Ministry of Defense said on Wednesday.

The ministry declared in a statement on Telegram that a number of areas in the northwestern and southeastern parts of the international waters of the Black Sea as “temporarily dangerous for navigation,” adding that the flag countries of ships traveling to Ukrainian ports will be considered parties to the conflict on Kyiv’s side.

The statement said: “In connection with the cessation of the functioning of the Black Sea Grain Initiative and the сlosing of the maritime humanitarian corridor, from 00.00 Moscow time on 20 July 2023, all vessels sailing in the waters of the Black Sea to Ukrainian ports will be regarded as potential carriers of military cargo. Accordingly, the countries of such vessels will be considered to be involved in the Ukrainian conflict on the side of the Kyiv regime. In addition, a number of sea areas in the north-western and south-eastern parts of the international waters of the Black Sea have been declared temporarily dangerous for navigation. Corresponding information warnings on the withdrawal of safety guarantees to mariners have been issued in accordance with the established procedure.”

This comes as Ukraine said on Wednesday Russia damaged grain export infrastructure in overnight strikes focused on two of its Black Sea ports. The Russian attack on Odesa for the second consecutive night came after Moscow quit on Monday the Black Sea Grain initiative – a year-old deal allowing the safe passage of Ukrainian grain through the Black Sea.

The declaration signifies a heightened level of aggression by Russia. By considering all such vessels as potential military cargo carriers, Russia is indicating its suspicion and intention to closely scrutinize and potentially interfere with their activities. By designating specific areas of the Black Sea as temporarily dangerous for navigation, Russia is asserting control over those regions and asserting its authority to monitor and potentially disrupt maritime traffic. This move effectively establishes a zone where vessels traveling to Ukrainian ports may face increased risks and encounters with Russian forces.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6261 Posts
July 20 2023 05:31 GMT
#9958
On July 20 2023 05:43 JimmiC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 20 2023 04:26 RvB wrote:
On July 20 2023 03:22 JimmiC wrote:
On July 20 2023 03:17 Ardias wrote:
On July 20 2023 02:45 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote:
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.


Best play could be for the rest of the world to say "Fine. You called it, now enforce it".

There are really not any rules when it comes to international politics but "paper blockades" have been considered illegal for a long time. That's when you declare a blockade but lack the power for full enforcement. Basically in order for neutral parties to consider the blockade legal you are supposed to be able to block ALL ships.

So the rest of the world could lean back and let a couple of grain ship pass through the Bosporus, hang a tight left into Romanian and Bulgarian national waters and enter Ukrainian (or international waters) within eyesight of the Ukrainian coastline. I'd hate to be the Russian captain who is supposed to stop and search a ship in that location...

Of course they could just send a radio message ordering all merchant ships in the black sea to divert to Sevastopol and start lobbing long range anti ship missiles if they don't obey. But that's not very traditional and it feels like a good way to get the entire black sea turned into a no go zone for your ships and aircraft or get into a real war with someone.

He doesn't need to. Per RU MoD press release:
"Any ships moving through Black Sea into Ukrainian ports are considered potential transporters of military cargo".
However I agree that it's yet to be seen if it would be enforced in practice. As well as if anyone tries to go through anyway. Hugging territorial waters is an option indeed. Still, it would most likely deter many private contractors from attempting to move in.
On July 20 2023 02:07 Zaros wrote:
Don’t really understand the logic of these attacks, it’s not going to impact Ukraine in military terms that all this grain is destroyed. If it’s sitting in Odessa silos then it was bound for export.

This is just going to piss off the rest of the world particularly Africa which depends on the grain. What does Russia actually gain by doing this other than destruction for destruction sake.

Maybe pushes food prices up further and encourages western support to erode, but that seems incredibly desperate.

Main Russian public concern was that ships inbound to Odessa were bringing military suppliers. Real (or main) reason - most likely to cut Ukraine from profits of grain trade, to decrease their capability to fund the war. Especially considering that Ukraine's European neighbours are still banning Ukraine's grain import as well.
On July 20 2023 01:47 JimmiC wrote:
It will be interesting to see how it plays out, I’m not sure Russia has the power to enforce it and it is a wildly unpopular choice that is only going erode support. Not to mention increase western support for Ukraine.

Widely unpopular where? Within Russia pro-westerners do not care, and patriots of different kinds are applauding it in unison.
If it's about Africa, then Russia made a lot of steps to assure that African nations will be promptly supplied by grain and fertilizers in any case.
https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21608.doc.htm
https://tass.com/politics/1625355
https://nation.africa/kenya/news/inside-russia-s-fertiliser-diplomacy-and-kenya-s-place-in-it--4257646
https://www.drycargomag.com/if-ukraine-grain-port-deal-expires-russia-to-supply-africa
https://www.africanews.com/2023/03/20/grain-deal-russia-ready-to-send-food-for-free-to-african-countries-in-need//
There certainly would be some fallout, but I'm not sure if it would be too big (if the blockade holds of course).

If it's about West, I doubt anyone in Kremlin (or even in Russia in general) cares too much at this point.


The whole talk of the fear of this deal collapsing was the good security in the south. If Russia is able to supply them all and keep the prices down then you are right it won’t be unpopular. I’m skeptical they will be able too, time will tell if as you say they are successful in the blockade.

I suspect it is bluster at this point and being used as a distraction and excuse to hit non military targets, time will tell.

You cannot keep prices down without rationing if you decrease supply. Certainly not with a commodity like grain. The costs will just be born by other market participants which, considering the nature of the market, means every other country in the world.

If you read his source Putin is saying that he will send the decrease in Ukrainian grain to Africa for free. So if you take his word the cost would even drop. I just do no think Russia has that supply or the economy to be able to pay for it, hence my skepticism.

Yes, I read it. I might've been unclear sorry. What I meant is that it'll still increase prices for countries that do not receive the free grain because the blockade reduces supply. It's just going to piss off the countries that do not receive the free grain. I also share your skepticism. I doubt Putin will send more than a token amount as a gift.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-20 15:19:13
July 20 2023 15:18 GMT
#9959
Again would this not, if had been successful, Poland triggering Article 5....?

Also the 60 tons of Grain that Russia destroyed during the bombing of Odessa, was destined for China. While at the same time the US believes Russia has plans to attack Civilian ships in the Black Sea and blaming Ukraine.

Russian agents who were allegedly planning to sabotage trains with weapons and humanitarian aid to Ukraine have been exposed in Poland.

According to Gazeta Polska, citing its sources, the uncovered Russian network, including its 66 case volumes, had plans to sabotage trains carrying weapons and humanitarian aid for Ukraine.

The risk of direct attacks apparently prompted the Polish special services to initiate arrests. "For this reason, the first arrests were made precisely at that time, not any other. The risk of attacks was too significant to continue monitoring the group's actions," shared an anonymous source familiar with the case materials.

Journalists also learned that the intelligence network was relatively "fresh" as it was created in early 2023.

The agents reportedly were instructed directly from Moscow and were compensated mainly in cryptocurrencies for executing assigned tasks.

This exposed network is currently considered the largest of its kind in modern Polish history.

In March, Poland announced the liquidation of a spy network operating in favour of Russia. Nine individuals were initially arrested as part of the operation, later increasing to 15. Among them were citizens of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine, according to media reports.

The fifteenth individual arrested was a professional Russian hockey player.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Excludos
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway8231 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-20 17:04:43
July 20 2023 17:04 GMT
#9960
On July 21 2023 00:18 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Again would this not, if had been successful, Poland triggering Article 5....?

Also the 60 tons of Grain that Russia destroyed during the bombing of Odessa, was destined for China. While at the same time the US believes Russia has plans to attack Civilian ships in the Black Sea and blaming Ukraine.

Show nested quote +
Russian agents who were allegedly planning to sabotage trains with weapons and humanitarian aid to Ukraine have been exposed in Poland.

According to Gazeta Polska, citing its sources, the uncovered Russian network, including its 66 case volumes, had plans to sabotage trains carrying weapons and humanitarian aid for Ukraine.

The risk of direct attacks apparently prompted the Polish special services to initiate arrests. "For this reason, the first arrests were made precisely at that time, not any other. The risk of attacks was too significant to continue monitoring the group's actions," shared an anonymous source familiar with the case materials.

Journalists also learned that the intelligence network was relatively "fresh" as it was created in early 2023.

The agents reportedly were instructed directly from Moscow and were compensated mainly in cryptocurrencies for executing assigned tasks.

This exposed network is currently considered the largest of its kind in modern Polish history.

In March, Poland announced the liquidation of a spy network operating in favour of Russia. Nine individuals were initially arrested as part of the operation, later increasing to 15. Among them were citizens of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine, according to media reports.

The fifteenth individual arrested was a professional Russian hockey player.


Source


Russia still belives that they can just do whatever they want, and if caught, can just go "Niiiet. Not us! It vas smoll green men vho happen to speak Ruski!". They still haven't figured out that absolutely no one believes a word that is coming out of their mouths
Prev 1 496 497 498 499 500 913 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
17:30
#38
RotterdaM778
TKL 481
IndyStarCraft 319
SteadfastSC141
BRAT_OK 128
EnkiAlexander 17
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 778
TKL 481
IndyStarCraft 319
SteadfastSC 141
BRAT_OK 128
JuggernautJason116
ProTech64
MindelVK 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2114
EffOrt 352
Shuttle 128
Soulkey 116
Mong 48
ivOry 13
NaDa 6
Dota 2
qojqva2119
capcasts38
febbydoto2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
FalleN 3146
fl0m2105
byalli1299
Foxcn325
edward187
adren_tv115
ptr_tv54
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu378
Other Games
summit1g14575
Grubby2338
FrodaN1017
Beastyqt892
ceh9468
Harstem189
QueenE146
Livibee68
Mew2King47
OptimusSC22
Organizations
StarCraft 2
WardiTV3162
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 191
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 17
• HerbMon 4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV516
League of Legends
• Jankos2548
• TFBlade1384
Other Games
• imaqtpie1758
• Shiphtur247
Upcoming Events
OSC
4h 4m
Replay Cast
13h 4m
RongYI Cup
15h 4m
Clem vs TriGGeR
Maru vs Creator
WardiTV Invitational
18h 4m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 5h
Replay Cast
1d 13h
RongYI Cup
1d 15h
herO vs Solar
WardiTV Invitational
1d 18h
The PondCast
2 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
HomeStory Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
HomeStory Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Rongyi Cup S3
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.